User talk:Foobarnix

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

List of climate change deniers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of climate change deniers. Since you had some involvement with the List of climate change deniers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dmcq (talk) 00:27, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrej Bauer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrej Bauer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Andrej Bauer& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

virtual-history.com - what is it?
I see you've added virtual-history.com to articles in the past. I'm trying to figure out what the site is and when, if ever, it belongs in articles. Any help would be welcome. I've yet to find any discussion about it amidst thousands of links, though it was brought up as possible spam once but didn't get any responses at the time. --Ronz (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I do not recall when I added virtual-history to articles although I suppose I did. Can you link me to an article where I did this and then I can be more helpful.
 * It was a long time ago, but maybe this will help --Ronz (talk) 15:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Here is the main page of virtual history. It appears to be one of the many film and movie star data bases that exist on the web.  In my experience, it has a lot of nice details about film people, etc.  That is about all I know about it.
 * Thanks. I think you're right, though it looks it was created with a complete disregard to copyrights of any kind, so I assume any concern about facts is poor as well.
 * I'm going to slowly work toward treating it as spam, starting at ELN just to see if anyone had past experience with it or has other ideas what it might be. Thanks again. --Ronz (talk) 15:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Disc golf courses in Charlotte, North Carolina has been nominated for discussion
Category:Disc golf courses in Charlotte, North Carolina, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 16:13, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

McGill Rose Garden
Hi, I was about to move McGill Rose Garden (Charlotte, North Carolina) and noticed your instruction at the shorter redirect page. This would seem to violate WP:CONCISE. Is there some kind of discussion or local consensus I should know about? The longer name would appear to be unjustified. 162 etc. (talk) 17:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Theatre companies in Hawaii


A tag has been placed on Category:Theatre companies in Hawaii indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Category:Iraqi coppersmiths has been nominated for renaming
Category:Iraqi coppersmiths has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Scottish coppersmiths has been nominated for splitting
Category:Scottish coppersmiths has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:English coppersmiths has been nominated for splitting
Category:English coppersmiths has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Dutch coppersmiths has been nominated for splitting
Category:Dutch coppersmiths has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Foobarnix/Article builder 1


Hello, Foobarnix. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Article builder 1".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Broom and a Mop (talk) 01:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)