User talk:Gzuckier

Whalley
Hi, I saw your edits to Whalley. You need to put double brackets around the article that you're trying to redirect to. You can learn more about editing by trying Tutorial, or ask questions at Help desk. Best wishes, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 20:39, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)

"smugly pedantic"
If you toss names around like that, I will notch-down my respect for your comments. Also, did you read this link?

Rex071404 23:37, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

COX-2 selective inhibitor
What is your source for this article? KeithTyler 17:01, Aug 31, 2004 (UTC)

Black triangles
Kudos for writing that article single-handedly. It's fascinating and well-written. ~ FriedMilk 16:58, 2004 Sep 2 (UTC)

Helo word porgarm
Actually, not a typo but an artifact. When "internal memo" was still at the beginning of that description it really did need "an". But thanks, I tend to forget things like that. Aliter 20:51, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
It could just be me, but recent edits to this article seem to me to say way too much about how great MIT is, and seem to be moving it in the direction of being a bland PR puff job. I'd appreciate it if previous contributors would keep an eye on this article and make sure it reflects a reasonable consensus about what "neutrality" means. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 19:43, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Maple
Hi Gzuckier - any chance you could spread the new pics at maple out a bit more, so they don't overlap and clog up the page layout? Also I'd understood that conditional use copyrighted images were no longer considered desirable (being contrary to the free use ethic of wikipedia), I may be wrong there but it would be worth checking. Thanks - MPF 22:12, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Underscores
Hello. There is no need for the underscores in the link to Mark V Shaney, i.e., you don't have to write Mark_V_Shaney, and it looks better without those things. Michael Hardy 21:15, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Wiki syntax
Hi Gzuckier. Any reason why single brackets need a nowiki tag (eg as on methotrexate)? JFW | T@lk  17:37, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Anti-Semitism
...dunno, seems to me that your addition is inherantly POV, in that it proffers an explanation for the lack of one particular usage that isn't really born out by anything other than speculation -- I think the article stands better without your addition: it just states the fact that the inclusion of Arabs in the term "anti-semitism" has not caught on. --jpgordon{gab} 18:26, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Gzuckier
I have deleted several of your stub articles on museums. You can't create articles without content. Feel free to re-create these articles with actual text when you have more time. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 21:48, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)

Enzyme
Hi, thanks for your additions to enzyme clarifying and expanding points, the article is improving! One small request, though, please don't forget to fill out the edit summary. Thanks. --Lexor|Talk 17:07, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)

The Humungous Image Tagging Project
Hi. You've helped with the WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Holocaust talk page
Please be a bit more careful when dealing with Holocaust denial.. especially when chatting with anonymous/unsigned users.. (As user Jayig suggested -its probably troll-bait >of the nazi kind< put to catch people out and get them to provide a legit looking platform for their deliberate disinformation. I was going to reply to them - but u did so first.. Its probaby not the place to wax lyrical e.g: "So that sort of leaves the significance of the Jews vis a vis the Holocaust as kind of the canary in the coal mine of sociological pathology, I guess." Canaries in the coal mine IS NOT FUNNY max rspct 19:30, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

RROma rromanes rhomi tigane: Please see the link rroma

HKWNB, HKCOTW, Current events
Hi. I noticed you have edited some Hong Kong-related articles. You might be interested to take a look at HK wikipedians' notice board, HK Collaboration of the Week and Current events in Hong Kong and Macao. Happy editing! &mdash; Instantnood 18:05, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)

Yale deaths
Gzuckier, I now realise that you have arguments which you at least feel strongly about, and you aren't adding the section to Yale about deaths on campus purely to start some argument, so I am willing to let you add this section if you wish and will leave it alone. I added you to the 3RR section because at the time I was dealing with a few other similar disputes on the Bill Clinton page and the Franklin D. Roosevelt page, where users were continually undoing changes agreed upon, and the anon. user you were most at war with seemed to have a strong case.

Anyway, I can see you have a serious belief that your edits belong on the Yale page, so I will step aside and let you go ahead with these changes. And if anyone else has objections, let them argue their own cases. That's all I want to say. I'd welcome a response from you. 10:23, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

I'm not proud, but sometimes people can be so annoying.... - Nunh-huh 17:47, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I wonder at the judgement of those who would rather try to precipitate a "war of escalating quotes" than simply admit the word prestigious is not in dispute in this instance. The quotation hunt, at least, is a game I'll decline to play . - Nunh-huh 18:05, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Working Man's Barnstar


I just wanted to give you this as a token of my appreciation for your great work on Deadwood and various related articles. You've greatly expanded the article in a short time. And the articles on the figures in Deadwood history/characters on the programme are realyl great to have! Try to do E. B. Farnum next maybe :-P... Anyhow, seriously, really, really awesome work! BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 01:59, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Oh, hey, by the way &mdash; check out the collection of images of historic Deadwood I've uploaded to Commons: Deadwood, South Dakota. BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??)</b> 02:40, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

WP:AN/3RR postings
Please sign all posts (with ~ ) so we know who made them, and when, without consulting the history. Thanks. Noel (talk) 14:22, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

vandal voters
Hi there. Thanks for your vote in. Some people humilated your vote and others. i added them in vandalism in progress. please share your idea about it. Many thanks Hamidifar

Editing free use covers, etc.
Hi,

I was about to ask the same question on Wikipedia talk:Image use policy/copyright. Did you ever find out? CTOAGN 15:28, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Bush disputes
You voted in an earlier poll about the George W. Bush article. There's now a more elaborate poll on the same subject. If you want to comment and/or express a preference for any of the listed alternatives, you'll find it here. JamesMLane 05:43, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ford Thunderbolt
Nice add to the Fairlane article. Thanks! --SFoskett 15:22, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Votes for deletion/WikiProject Addressing Anti-Jewish Bias
Thought you might be interested. Jayjg <sup style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 22:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wikiporn
This idea sounds good. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 29 June 2005 18:57 (UTC)

And exists - check out http://www.wikiporn.org

Reverting vandalism on your user page
I took the freedom to revert some vandalism on your user page, hope it was ok. -- Elisson | Talk 2 July 2005 14:19 (UTC)

Thank you :)
Though I'm sure some people will take it as serious evidence of such a cabal. Jayjg <sup style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 5 July 2005 03:35 (UTC)

George Bush
Thanks for pointing out my revert mistake. I was trying to remove the reference to "semen" where it used to be "treaty" but ended up reverting to an even worse vandalism. I think we have it now, though. - Tεx  τ  urε  5 July 2005 19:11 (UTC)

Help a poor Jew out
I really am poor ($0/year income, $650+/mo. in bills). What would it require to at least receive the dubious honor of a wikicabal barnstar? I'm feeling particularly barnstarved right now... :-p Tomer <sup style="font-size:x-small; color:#129DBC;">TALK  July 6, 2005 09:33 (UTC)

Numerus clausus
Gzuckier, would you consider moving the main body of your Anti-Semitism Numerus clausus additions to Numerus clausus article and leaving its summary? IMHO, unnecessary redundancy is wiki's plague. --Ttyre 17:06, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Song located
Check this out: [http://www.pdmusic.org/1800s/74odw.txt Oh! Dat Watermelon lyrics], listed at libraries & worldcat as the actual song in the film about racism that you mentioned. I suspect Foster and Schoolcraft were sometimes confused with each other because Foster was better known. I plan to view the interesting-sounding film sometime, thanks (will have to drive to do it; few copies are to be found around the U.S. at libraries, but i have located the one nearest me that has a copy). (Scroll down on this page for the song you had mentioned, no ref. in it to watermelons, do a text search on the page for "massa's in de" to find lyrics.) Thanks for introducing me to the film. Bebop 15:18, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I have a few more things to say that I've learned about this song and film, but will do so by email. I am mostly sure though that I have found the right song though. And for just now it's probably just as well not to reply to my userpage for something till I archive what's there in a few days and have a blank page again. P.S. both "Massa's in de Cold Cold Ground" by Foster and Schoolcraft's "Oh! Dat Watermelon" are in the film (the first of the two songs is not where the film got its name though). Bebop 17:55, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

J. Lott
A user by the name of Hipocrite removed your most recent edit. I put it back, but if you feel it should be removed, that is your decision. I saw nothing wrong with it, Hipocrite apparently thinks there's nothing ground breaking in Lott's work. I happen to disagree. Al Lowe 21:53, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

Reading spark plugs for racing
Mind having a look at Votes_for_undeletion? Thanks. Samw 14:15, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Ted Kennedy and rape trial information poll
Please give your vote on the talk page.Voice of All(MTG) 02:58, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

minor question of correct number of pronoun (Protocols)
There is a link to 'false document' here, but the meaning of the false document article appears to relate to artistic creations, rather than to forgeries of this sort.

Are we top posting here or bottom posting? Anyway, are the Protocols an 'It' or a 'They'? I'd be inclined to consider them a they, but most of the editing seems to think otherwise. ?? PS Sam Spade, nice edit, kept the point I was trying to make, in a NPOV type of way. Gzuckier 19:19, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

It's definitely "they" and it is "authors" not an author, as the research of Cesare de Michelis shows [Italian professor, Russian literature if I am correct. His study is now translated in English: http://www.nebraskapress.unl.edu/bookinfo/4546.html

The Non-Existent Manuscript A Study of the Protocols of the Sages of Zion By Cesare G. De Michelis Translated by Richard Newhouse

Basically he reconstructs the original manuscript based on the still existent variants. Even in its earliest states of creation one can see that many different authors had their fingers in the creations adding or if you like contributing rather freely. So sorry, no author but some kind of teamwork or forging process. [Paradox: a conspiracy that creates the ultimate myth of a conspiracy] Not much time now, just wanted to add this LeaNder 16:35, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Hi Dad!
you have s strange combination of interests it seems. LeaNder 18:30, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know
I've voted. Meanwhile, I have run into what I consider disruptive behaviour and WP:POINT at List of political epithets. In my view, User:Liftarn has been removing material and asking for citations for material which has already been cited, and has been insisting on citations exclusively for, and inserting NPOV notices in, Jewish-related epithets, when no citations have been provided for any of the other epithets on the page, and when he has raised no specific objections in Talk:. Could you possibly take a look? Jayjg <sup style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 15:53, 19 August 2005 (UTC)


 * I have actually not removed anything, it's just commented away awaiting citations (real ones, not invented). As Jayjg is pushing his POV in those areas it's ofcourse those areas that get attention for NPOVing. It should be noted that who first started requiering sources for everything was Jayjg. // Liftarn

Barnstar of the Elders of Wikipedia
On the topic of the Barnstar of the Elders of Wikipedia, I would like to know how I can help in that "spirited defense" that the award speaks of... Shalom. --jonasaurus 05:54, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Featured picture - comments requested
I'm nominating one of my photos for 'featured picture'. Voting isn't for two days, but I'd appreciate your comments if you feel to add them. -- RyanFreisling @ 15:55, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

BigDaddy777
How would you reccomend dealing with him? I'm losing my patience. Hipocrite - « Talk » 17:38, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Request
I am asking past editors of the Karl Rove page to weigh in on a survey. If you can spare a couple of minutes, please visit this page: Talk:Karl Rove/September Survey, read the introduction, and answer the three questions that have been posed. Thank you. paul klenk 09:25, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

Jewish categories
Hi I noted your input in the Jewish lists so hopefully this will interest you. I started making a few new categories: Category:Jews in music, Category:Jews in science, and Category:Jews in the visual arts, however User:Lulu_of_the_Lotus-Eaters has nominated all these for renaming due to his aversion to the phrase "Jews in". The reason I created the Jews in music category was because I knew Category:Jewish musicians and Category:Jewish music existed but mainly covered yiddish/religious music. I have persuaded Lulu to change the name of the current category to Jewish classical musicians (as this basically covers the people I had added to it) but I still feel a category such as Category:Jews in western music needs to be the parent category of all classical, pop, jazz, rock, musical sub categories to avoid confusion with yiddish music, Klezmer etc. I would appreciate your views on this here Talk:List_of_Jews Arnie587 23:25, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Saddam and AQ page
Hi - there's a vote going on at Talk:Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda that you may be interested in.--csloat 06:27, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Cycling wikiproject
I noticed your last page of contributions is almost all cycling-related articles. Thanks for these. Have you joined the Cycling WikiProject? One thing I noticed: : bike-stub is a redirect to cycling-stub, so please use that instead. WP is a little slow right now, so I haven't been able to look at your other contribs. --Christopherlin 23:53, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Album covers copyright
Hi, I saw your question at Wikipedia_talk:Image_use_policy/copyright. In case you don't watch that page, I'll reply here too. I think your friend is right, although there are many editors who don't bother to make the distinction (and I am usually one of them). See Template:albumcover, which I assume the covers are being uploaded under, namely solely to illustrate the album or single in question. Just go to Jow Blow's official website, find a picture that looks vaguely press-release-style, and upload it under Template:Promotional or Template:promophoto. Also, it's fair use, not free use - there's a bit of a difference. :) HTH --pfctdayelise 14:39, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Lott
You added a controversial tag to John Lott but it sez its only for talk pages. Was this deliberate? William M. Connolley 22:09, 20 November 2005 (UTC).

Campaign to delete Jewish categories
please vote here Categories_for_deletion. Arniep 13:32, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Lott article
Just take it easy, I know you're frustrated. Rkevins82 20:02, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

OK? Rkevins82 21:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

No idea what you're getting at - this really isn't a big deal. Rkevins82 23:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

You too
In the spirit of reciprocity, I hereby award you one of the ugliest awards I've seen in a long time. Though we shouldn't think of editing conflicts as "wars", the Lott matter has not been a conventional editing dispute. Let's remain vigilant, but work towards peace. (Yes, I know, some dreams are elusive). Cheers, -Willmcw 09:25, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your support on my RfA
<div style="align: center; padding: 1em 1em 1em 1em; border: solid 2px darkblue; background-color:lightblue;">

Hey Gzuckier! Thanks for your support on my RfA. The final outcome was (57/4/3), so I am now an administrator. If you need help, have a question, or just want to chat (or if I get out of line!), please don't hesitate to let me know! Again, thanks! :D  Tom e r<sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #129dbc!important;">talk 

Looking for input
Kmf164 and I are looking for some feedback on a particular external link at hybrid vehicle. We'd appreciate your feedback. (See the second "External Links" heading.) uriah923(talk) 23:45, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

John Lott
Your attention is requested at John Lott, again. Sockpuppetry reigns. Hipocrite - « Talk » 00:07, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:CHAIN TOOL ANNOTATED.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:CHAIN TOOL ANNOTATED.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. bluemask 12:26, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Prices in automotive infobox
Hi, I'd appreciate your feedback at this discussion. Thanks! Shawnc 06:22, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Non-barnstar
LOL!!!!! Jayjg <small style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 19:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

DDT ban
You can read about the nonexistent "DDT ban" in Wikipedia's DDT ban article. --Uncle Ed 19:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

There's more:


 * FOLLOWING RUCKELSHAUS'S BAN, the USAID, prodded by a lawsuit by the Audubon Society and the Natural Resources Defense Council, undertook to discourage other countries from using DDT by threatening to stop foreign aid to any country using it. Its threat spread Ruckelshaus's ban worldwide.

Is this simply incorrect, or what? --Uncle Ed 20:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Deleting Al Gore's Trivia section
Why did you delete the trivia section I started on Al Gore's entry? I'm going to revert your deletion and put it on the talk page for discussion, since you didn't give a reason for your deletion. --No Dodo 04:03, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

IHR - revision vs. denial
I've restored the original designation, which is what is cited in the footnote as well, but I expect trouble... Jayjg <small style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 20:15, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Diebold Election Systems
I moved the election-related controversies to Diebold Election Systems, where they may need to be edited. The Diebold article is just about the parent company, of which DES is only a very tiny part, albeit the more interesting. Cheers, -Will Beback 22:30, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Good solution. Thanks, -Will Beback 19:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

travail en perruque
Thank you for your informations. Effectively, working on side is not equivalent. The link you gave me on eBay is very similar to "perruque". Perruque is works made for the employee, for his home, for a guift, made during official working hours, and not something to be sold. The worker uses boss's machines, because he dont have the equivalent at home. It is not an on side job, to make more money. It was a well known activity (but secrete) in machining workshops, on milling, grinding, drilling machines, on which workers use to make parts for themselves out of materials that will be scrapped anyway. In fact, in french, equivalent words to "perruque" are a lot, depending of the town, of the activity of the company. And the origin of "perruque" seams to be the same as "wig": something hidden, not clear. We also say in french "travail masqué" = hidden job, which is different of "travail clandestin" or "travail au noir", which are illegal for a national tax point of view. All words in french are in popular linguage. "We" began to use these words at the beginning of industry, even just before. (years 1850) Thank for your advices. I think I will find something clear for understanding. --Barbetorte 16:59, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Bicycle Fork
"Contrary to the traditional diamond bicycle frame, for which the forces can be very accurately modeled mathematically, the more complex shape of the fork does not allow such precise calculations. Perhaps as a result, forks tend to fail more often than frames."


 * Is there any reference for this? Given the shapes of current all-carbon frames, and the state of Finite element analysis, I'd be very surprised to learn that forks are just too complex to model properly. Heck, they can model an entire car to analyze crumple zones. Besides, I've just seen a new Trek Madone involved in a crash with a car. The fork blades where fine, but the head tube of the frame was broken in half. AndrewDressel 13:49, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bicycle_fork"

Deletion of a picture
It seems that some people never learn or change. Thanks for the heads up. Alyeska 23:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Deleted images
The images that you pointed out were deleted because they fell under the criteria for speedy deletion, in which case there's no necessity to inform the uploader. Specifically, they were deleted because they were tagged as "fair use" and were not used in any article (see CSD I5). Sorry for the inconvenience. Coffee 04:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Bad disambig
Hi, thanks for the catch in Internal combustion engine. It appears that an article does not exist for the charge the article is talking about. Do you think there needs to be one, or would it be little else than a dictionary definition? Maybe we should just take the link off that word? Aguerriero ( talk ) 18:03, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

User Conduct RfC against Commodore Sloat
Hi, I'm contacting you to ask that you take a look at the conduct RfC brought against me by. I'm contacting you because the RfC involves some pages that you have edited on in the past. I value whatever contribution you may make to the RfC page, if you are so inclined. Thanks.--csloat 07:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

If only...
It's not a good idea to insert speculations into articles, like "Ken Miles would have ..." --Matthead 17:03, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

1956 Hungarian Revolution
Greetings! I took the liberty of relocating your sentence and link to the US State Department commemoration of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution from the first paragraph to the "10 November onwards" section, since it fits into the timeline better in that place. I also coverted the link from an embedded HTML to a footnote, to match the citation system already in place in the article. Hope it meets with your approval. Regards, Ryanjo 22:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Aurora Safety Car
I found a copy of the April 1958 Mechanics Illustrated and added some info to the article. I found your input interesting. What were your scources? randazzo56 00:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

2006 Long Island Sound Plane Crash
Help!, other useres are trying to delete my article but I objected saying that the plane crash is notable. Please vote keep on the vote page in order to save this article.Storm05 13:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Should a reporter who was sued for defamation be allowed to be the primary author of a Wikipedia article about the person who sued him?
See the article re: Michel Thomas: it is largely written by, and is constantly edited by, an LA Times reporter named Roy Rivenburg, who was sued by Mr. Thomas for defamation in 2001, after Rivenburg's profile of Thomas was published in the L.A. Times. The article portrayed Thomas, then 87 years old, as a fraud who had fabricated or exaggerated important aspects of his WWII service.

Mr. Thomas's friends subsequently put up a web site in 2002, rebutting the profile, (see http://www.michelthomas.org). In 2004, as a result of the research efforts undertaken to gather evidence for the lawsuit, which were forwarded to the U.S. Army by Senator John McCain and New York Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney, Thomas was awarded the Silver Star for his bravery fighting the Nazis in France. He had originally been nominated for the medal in 1944, and several of his surviving comrades, who had not seen him in nearly sixty years, recommended him for the medal after learning his war record had been questioned by Mr. Rivenburg. Senators Bob Dole and John Warner presented the medal to Thomas, in the shadow of the Atlantic Wall of the WWII Memorial, days before the Memorial's official dedication. The Ambassador of France also attended, and saluted Thomas for his bravery fighting with U.S. troops, as well as with the French Resistance.

After Thomas died at age 90, in 2005, Rivenburg undertook a systematic effort to discredit Thomas, including posting an article on his personal web site at http://www.offkilter.org. This includes links to other bloggers with headers like, "That Lying Old Fraud Michel Thomas Has Died."

Even the most casual perusal of the background facts should persuade an objective outsider that Mr. Rivenburg is anything but neutral.

The article has recently been flagged as NPOV, but I believe a case can be made that Mr. Rivenburg is inherently biased, and should be barred from editing the article. Can you advise?


 * DO NOT ALLOW ANYONE WHO INTENTIALLY DISRESPECTED A UNITED STATES MILITARY VETERAN FROM EVER DOING AN ARTICLE OF THE PERSON HE DISRESPECTED. Carajou 02:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

--Facts@mt.org

G-type supercharger
I think this deserves its own article, as opposed to being in the centrifugal one. Do you have any good sources that describe how it works? Maury 19:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Ann Coulter column additions
Just went to add the newer columns abandoning the the sinking TitAnnic and saw you'd already done so - and written much better than I ever could, well done :) - Gl e n 16:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

David Irving
I appreciated your joke, but it seems someone else didn't. Ah well. --Guinnog 02:12, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Coaster brakes
Thank you for your helpful additions to the coaster brake section of bicycle brake systems. --Adamrush 14:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Bose Headphone Family
I know that you have worked on Bose related pages before and I was hoping that I could get you involved with the discussion here! Thanks -- UKPhoenix79 07:16, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Sports Car Racing
Due to your involvement in some Wiki pages that regard sports car racing of some sort, I would like to ask for you to look into the proposed WikiProject for Sports Car Racing. Any help you may have to offer to the project will be greatly appreciated. The359 03:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Gzuckier, would you mind e-mailing me? Jayjg <small style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 16:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * You can use the little "E-mail this user" link on the side of my user page to e-mail me. :-) Jayjg <small style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 18:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:94_1_b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:94_1_b.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Rntbrm3litergp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rntbrm3litergp.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Harley Earl
I see someone is attemping once again to "Claean Up" the article on our boy. What is wrong with telling the truth about this despot? -user Kaltenborn

Heat Exchange
Jblongley 18:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)jblongley Thanks for the addition of "heat". A hundred percent correct of course.

reverting
can you expalain this revert Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 23:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Information Builders article
In order for this to escape the purge I've moved it to User:Gzuckier/Information Builders where if you want you can add some evidence of notability, or some sources. I've left all the incoming red links in anticipation of a shiny article, so if you don't want to fix it up tell me so that I can remove them. Cheers. - brenneman  color="black" title="Admin actions">{L} 05:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Unsigned messages
Hi, I have noticed that you are a great contributor to the fight against vandalism, thanks!

However, I have a small request. Please would you sign your posts on the user's talk page?

Thanks

LittleOldMe 12:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

152.157.207.189
Hi, Just a quick question, you gave the above IP a level 1 warning then a 4 and then went backwards a gave two level 1 afterwards. Was this intentional and did you report them to WP:AIV. I'm only asking as it's a vandal IP on my watchlist. Cheers Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 22:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

re: Gun politics
Yeah, the popups tool does that sometimes. I think it's a timing thing. One person fixes the vandalism on one server but the popup processes the transaction on a different server. When the timestamps don't exactly match, the wrong transaction can get changed. I've seen it a few times before. That's why I just fixed it and didn't bother you about it.

That's also part of the reason why I still prefer to do my work manually rather than through the popups tool. It's a little slower but I don't see as many problems. Thanks for helping with the vandalism patrol. Rossami (talk) 15:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Equix
Although it may be have been cited in the New York Times (which probably was just a brief bit or two), it really is not a notable company in its own respect. If you Google the company, you get <1000 hits, and the only links in the article are to the company website. There is no other way to verify any factual content besides going to the actual website. Nish kid 64  18:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Article restored and now at Articles for deletion/Equix. Feel free to add your comments. ~ trialsanderrors 23:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Allegations of Israeli apartheid
There is some general gratuitous mud slinging going on at the article right now which I'm not about to take part in, but I did respond to you here:. --Deodar 00:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Expert
I am looking for an electromagnetic expert for discussion. My e-mail is colmarksman@msn.com, colmarksman being my MSN IM name. If you are this person, I will look forward to speaking with you. If you are not, could you please direct me to someone else? (By expert, I specifically mean someone who graduated from a university and works on electromagnetism for a living. Colonel Marksman 01:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

User talk:207.30.145.6
Did you intend to post multiple warnings at once? --Geniac 20:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Nostradamus
I liked your reference to the above in the Protocols of Zion article so that I was inspired to make a link to it, as well as to Fortune-telling & Astrology.

Talk:George W. Bush
It's unfair for you to revert comments made by other users; otherwise I would have deleted your response to me to begin with. Please leave the talk page alone. (In case, this is how you view it, I'm not interested in a conflict.) --Iriseyes 21:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh, alright then. Thanks for clearing that up. --Iriseyes 18:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

"Oye Vey!"

 * Can you explain what you meant?

'"The article deteriorates largely because of the attempt by certain elemnts ( non-goyim ) to attack it before they have even written the article - worse while they are writing it. Any article in wiki that touches on any such subject gets gutted before the first period."' '"The Protocols of the Elders of the Non-Goyim suggests just such a strategy!! Gzuckier 15:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC) "'


 * Yours truly, --Ludvikus 02:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Edit war
Hi, i need your help on the Safiyya bint Huyayy article in wikipedia. She was a Jewish girl from the Banu Nadir tribe. Banu naddir where killed by mohammad and the women where taken as concubines. An editor there is making war about me including the word concubine in. Plz read the talk page, karl neatral, and wants more editors to be involved. Thanks.

FrummerThanThou 14:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rickenbackerfryingpan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rickenbackerfryingpan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 20:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Coffee as a carcinogen
Hi, it might be so that some molecule in the complex mix of molecules in coffee is to some extent a carcinogen. However, I would think it is a very bad idea to give coffee as an example of a carcinogen on Wikipedia when there are much more evident examples (for instance, why not astbestos, dioxines, gamma radiation, etc which are true inducers of cancer). I mean, if coffee should be denoted as a carcinogen, then barbequed meat is also a very potent carcinogen. Please, respond on my talk page. /80.217.232.217 11:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Thanks for your support in my RfA. I've felt it best to withdraw on this occasion and think about the good advice I received. Thanks again, Jakew 19:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
Pardon me, but why did you revert the Buoyancy article again, just after I reverted a vandalism? --Freiddy 20:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Alright then, but I think there's a vandalist working around again: 204.108.230.2. If you can, please tell what I should do about this vandalist. Should I request for a block? (He/She has done this many times in different pages). --Freiddy 20:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Regarding this vandal User_talk:204.108.230.2 it seems that he's been given the "last warning" too many times. He vandalizes, he gets a tag; he comes back, vandalizes again, he gets a tag.  There's two options as I see it: 1), call up the school district, let them know the exact times each was happening; they can trace it to their individual computers and talk to the individual responsible.  Or 2), you can place a permanent block on the IP addy that would last a lot longer than what has been given before...say, twenty years? Carajou 03:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Electricflag.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Electricflag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Why did you add warnings on User talk:207.10.170.13?
Why did you add warnings about one edit, which I had warned about an hour before, and another, which took place 10 days ago? (assuming you meant Michael Anthony?) See the dates on Special:Contributions/207.10.170.13 -- AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I see you did something similar on User talk:72.144.156.114. IP addresses are often not used by a single specific person, but can belong to internet cafes, public libraries, schools, and so forth. If an IP hasn't edited in days between edits, odds are reasonable that the next edit won't come from the same person who made the last one, so warning about edits a long time ago may not be as useful as they may seem. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 21:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Also OPnly add one warning at a time and only add blantent vandal warnings to obvious vandalism rather than what may well be test edits as you did to User:207.216.142.65 Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 19:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

User:193.251.135.125
Despite your last warning on vandalism, the user went ahead and vandalized the article Ibrahim Bin Adham

Hassanfarooqi 17:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

User Category for Discussion
<div class="boilerplate metadata" id="cfd" style="margin: 0 5%; padding: 0 7px 7px 7px; background: #FFFCE6; border: 1px solid #aaa; text-align: left; font-size:95%;"> A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for Discussion policies. This does not mean that any of the userpages in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the User categories for discussion page. VegaDark 07:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Reciept of Vandalism Allegation
I received a message that seemed like it might have come from you that I might be blocked for vandalism on the Methamphatamine entry. I made changes to remove old vandalism of love messages and some profanity within the text of the entry that were entered before I ever read it. I did not do any damage to the article that I am aware of. I might have been red flagged since the URL for my entry is from the State of New Mexico, however. Sorry for any confusion. Thanks, B. Villanueva

Proposed Deletion
I have marked the article Elron Awards with a proposed deletion template. There's nothing noteworthy here. Avt tor 15:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

About this IP
It's a shared IP used at a high school, so I just thought i'd let you know there's generally many people acting under one adress.

Help:Reverting
I noticed that you reverted a good faith edit that I made to John Lott (econometricist), without any attempt at discussion and without answering my concerns on the talk page. Like me, you've been around a long time, and must know that this is treating me like I am a vandal, not someone trying to improve an article. I recognize that the article is a breeding ground for sockpuppets and vandals, but I am neither; please contribute and discuss rather than haphazardly revert other people's edits. --Spangineerws (háblame)  23:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response. I'll try to be more careful about making significant changes without explicitly mentioning them on the talk page.  I'll do my best to succinctly post my opinions on what the article needs so that discussion can be as painless as possible&mdash;I looked through the talk archives and wow, tempers really flared.  Hopefully all that can be avoided this time. --Spangineerws  (háblame)  20:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV
Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Generally recent means the same day, and usually within the last couple of hours. Bubba hotep 15:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Article Speedy Deletion Warning
A tag has been placed on APCO, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Boricuaeddie 18:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Request For Mediation
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Requests for mediation/David Irving, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Request for Mediation
This message delivered: 04:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC).

Mezhbizh (Hasidic dynasty) at Mediation Cabal
A long-simmering editorial dispute between and  over how to deal with information about certain Hasidic topics has reached the Mediation Cabal. Please see and provide any helpful input at Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-04-29 Mezhbizh (Hasidic dynasty). Thank you, IZAK 16:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Janisjoplinsuperhitscover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Janisjoplinsuperhitscover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Gracenotes
I indented your former neutral comment on the RfA, because it showed up as a double vote. —AldeBaer 16:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I, too, had to try over and over. The automagical secret is that there must always be the pound key "#" at the start and no empty line between the comments so that autonumbering isn't broken (whence the "restart" at 1 you mentioned). When indented with one or multiple colons, the comment will be left out of the count and will be indented as usual. Regards, —AldeBaer 19:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation on Automotive Industries Ltd
See that you didn't get this warning at the right time...

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Automobile Industries Limited, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Automobile Industries Limited and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Automobile Industries Limited with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Automobile Industries Limited.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Automobile Industries Limited/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Automobile Industries Limited saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Alvestrand 18:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bloomfield.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bloomfield.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Crosbystillsandnash.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Crosbystillsandnash.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  03:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * in response to your talk page, i'm leaving a reply for you here: "OK, thanks for the headsup. How's this? Gzuckier"

Non-free use disputed for Image:Crosbystillsandnash.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Crosbystillsandnash.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  18:20, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid
You have been named in the evidence talk page and in a proposed decision. I don't see any evidence that you are aware of the ArbComm case, so am notifying you.

Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Workshop. GRBerry 19:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:94_1_b.jpg
I have tagged Image:94_1_b.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. <font color="#777">~  <font color="#888">Wi <font color="#bbb">ki <font color="#aaa">her <font color="#ccc">mit  01:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Autounionv16.jpg
I have tagged Image:Autounionv16.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. <font color="#777">~  <font color="#888">Wi <font color="#bbb">ki <font color="#aaa">her <font color="#ccc">mit  01:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:77_1_b.jpg
I have tagged Image:77_1_b.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. <font color="#777">~  <font color="#888">Wi <font color="#bbb">ki <font color="#aaa">her <font color="#ccc">mit  02:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Wich towns
You might want to see Talk:History of salt for a discussion about Wich towns. Salinae 20:15, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ferrari49.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ferrari49.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 19:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Roadandtracklotus.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Roadandtracklotus.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 19:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Reference desk
Please don't post off-topic, off-color responses like this one. The reference desk is not a junior high school locker room. Friday (talk) 18:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Seconded. It's been removed - any more crap like that and you'll be in danger of getting blocked for wilfully disruptive edits.  Neil   ム  21:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposal to split DDT into sub articles
There is a proposal to split DDT into several sub-articles. As someone who has contributed regulary to this article, your input would be appreciated. Yilloslime (t) 21:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Charliemusselwhite.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Charliemusselwhite.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use images
Please do not add album cover images to illustrate articles about the artist. Per WP:FUC, these fair use images may only be used to illustrate articles or sections about the album. Note also that each individual application of a fair use image requires it own rationale on the image's page. Rklawton (talk) 15:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bluesbreakers.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bluesbreakers.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 14:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Johnhammonddobro.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Johnhammonddobro.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Albertcollins.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Albertcollins.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Olmo
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Olmo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Roddershandbookslingshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Roddershandbookslingshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Smallfacesfirststep.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Smallfacesfirststep.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stephenstills.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stephenstills.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Steppenwolf.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Steppenwolf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Catch phrase
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Catch phrase, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

My Rfa
Well, not this time anyway it seems...my effort to regain my adminship was unsuccessful, but your support was still very much appreciated. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thank you!--MONGO 07:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bluesharps.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bluesharps.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bloomfieldkoooper2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bloomfieldkoooper2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cannedheat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cannedheat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cream BBC Sessions Album Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cream BBC Sessions Album Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Brakshow.jpg
I have tagged Image:Brakshow.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 18:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Masciaghi
Another editor has added the  template to the article Masciaghi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Smallfacesfirststep.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Smallfacesfirststep.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Theturtles.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Theturtles.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Ciöcc
Another editor has added the  template to the article Ciöcc, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Motor Life magazine
Another editor has added the  template to the article Motor Life magazine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:1e 1 b.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:1e 1 b.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 05:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:1e 1 b.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:1e 1 b.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hotrodsohc427.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hotrodsohc427.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Prussian Blue (duo)
An editor has nominated Prussian Blue (duo), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Prussian Blue (duo) (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Looking for Wikipedians for a User Study
Hello. I am a graduate student in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Minnesota. We are conducting research on ways to engage content experts on Wikipedia. Previously, Wikipedia started the Adopt-a-User program to allow new users to get to know seasoned Wikipedia editors. We are interested in learning more about how this type of relationship works. Based on your editing record on Wikipedia, we thought you might be interested in participating. If chosen to participate, you will be compensated for your time. We estimate that most participants will spend an hour (over two weeks on your own time and from your own computer) on the study. To learn more or to sign up contact KATPA at CS dot UMN dot EDU or User:KatherinePanciera/WPMentoring. Thanks. KatherinePanciera (talk) 02:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Mate, can you help pls
Hey thanks again for the award you left. But now I find some geezer wants to delete an article H-Bomb Ferguson I started. I had only written one sentence when this thing appeared (see my talk page). As you can see I have done a lot more work. The guy Ferguson is one of the pioneers of rock and roll, how can he not be 'notable'. They should give you a chance I can't write a whole article in one go. Many thanks in case you can help Walking the blues (talk) 20:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)  (Just look at the revision history - I start at 5 35 then this stupid message appears a minute later !!!!!) Walking the blues (talk) 20:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

sorry dumbass
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.113.38 (talk) 16:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

GERRY RYAN HELP!
Why do people keep reverting the Gerry Ryan page?!?? And now you're accusing me of vandalism? Please explain yourself. This is ridiculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.17.151.33 (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Spam in PFLEX
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on PFLEX, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because PFLEX is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting PFLEX, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of PFLEX
I have nominated PFLEX, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/PFLEX. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Found poetry
Hey. You edited found poetry a while back, and I was wondering if you could look at it again and see what you could about the current state. IT seems to be a target for vandalism, so I hope you can at least watchlist it and be an extra pair of eyes for that. --Justpassin (talk) 23:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Muslims supporting Zionism
BrandonYusufToropov has again raised the issue of the appropriateness of noting Muslims who support for Zionism in the Zionism article. As you have commented on this issue before, I am notifying you of this, in case you wish to follow the new discussion, which you can find here. Jayjg <small style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 00:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Speed Mechanics
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Speed Mechanics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TubularWorld (talk) 00:32, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Allegations of apartheid deletion notification
Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning Allegations of Chinese apartheid. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, Allegations of apartheid, was recently nominated for deletion. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether Allegations of apartheid should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination). -- ChrisO (talk) 17:47, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alternative cancer treatment
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alternative cancer treatment, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. II | (t - c) 05:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cowznofski
I have nominated Cowznofski, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Cowznofski. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!) 21:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Smooth
Thanks for your kind words about my 4-banger smoothness edits. Usually you only hear from people when there's something wrong... —Preceding unsigned comment added by WinTakeAll (talk • contribs) 07:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Dan Doherty"
A page you created, Dan Doherty, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Rainbow Of Light <sup style="color:#5200A3;"> Talk  03:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Recent AfD on Christianity and Judaism
Hi! I see that you were one of the participants in the recent AfD on the article Christianity and Judaism. That AfD recommended (in a snowball result) that the article be merged into Judeo-Christian. However, since the AfD concerns have been raised, most notably
 * Per WP:ADJECTIVE and WP:MOSNAME, we use nouns and noun-phrases for article titles, not adjectives. So a general survey on the relationships between Christianity and Judaism (a topic this encyclopedia should certainly cover) should be called Christianity and Judaism, as per the articles Christianity and Islam, Islam and Judaism.
 * The reason the article Judeo-Christian exists, as its own hatnote declares, is specifically to survey the history and use of that word-phrase -- which has its own controversy, and its own tale to tell. (See here where I've set things out in a bit more detail.)  That story is a good fit for its own article, and will get completely lost if the contents of Christianity and Judaism get inappropriately dumped on top of it.

Having contacted the closing admin, his advice was to open a new discussion at Talk:Christianity and Judaism, advertise the discussion widely, and if a new consensus can be reached in that discussion [his emphasis], then per WP:CCC the new consensus should be followed, rather than the AfD decision, without the need for a DRV or a new AfD.

Concerns about the proposed merge have also been expressed by, and.

This post is therefore to let you know that that discussion is underway, at Talk:Christianity and Judaism, with a view to perhaps setting aside the AfD decision.

Of course, some significant issues were raised in the AfD about the article in its present form, so the best way forward is a question that needs some thought. Please feel welcome to come and participate! Jheald (talk) 07:50, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Jackandangel.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jackandangel.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Japaneseknotweedfoliage.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Japaneseknotweedfoliage.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Adminship
Say, have you ever considered applying for adminship? I can't say I know your contributions that well but you've been around for a long time, have reference desk and vandal fighting experience so you seem like a pretty natural candidate. Of course, I may be unaware of some problems but if you're interested, I could take a closer look at your history of contribs and nominate you. Let me know. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Voterseyeview.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Voterseyeview.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Damiens .rf 00:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Connecticut meetup
Hi! We invite you to the Hartford, Connecticut meetup, currently scheduled for January 24, as the previous meetup was lightly attended due to a snowstorm. You are being notified because your name is listed on Meetup/Hartford/Invite list. Cheers, –Juliancolton <sup style="color:#666660;">Tropical <sup style="color:#666660;">Cyclone  02:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Hartford Meetup: We need your help!
The next Connecticut Wikipedia meetup will take place sometime during April 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please list on the meetup page whether or not you can go. Also please contribute ideas for topics and dates! Hope to see you there! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Spider-Man
Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 01:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Connecticut Meetup: You are invited!
The 2nd Connecticute Meetup will take place on April 18th, 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please state whether or not you can attend on the meetup page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) because your name was on the invite list. 16:21, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Mayflower
I did not do that to Mayflower someone else must have hacked into my system. --76.214.107.68 (talk) 08:18, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

One Meatball
Thanks for the links! Do you think we should change the authorship on one or both of them? Luminifer (talk) 05:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Not
I am not sure why you are telling us that you do not speak Swahili. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.34.71 (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Voterseyeview.jpg
File:Voterseyeview.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Butterfly Voters View.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Possible move of Nazi plunder
I have started a discussion on possibly moving Nazi plunder. As you are currently a reasonably active editor, as well as a past contributor to the article, I hope you can find some time to make comments at renaming Nazi plunder. <font color="52A249">Un <font color="23CE40">sch <font color="7ED324">ool 17:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your input! <font color="52A249">Un <font color="23CE40">sch <font color="7ED324">ool 22:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Odd
I am not sure why you tell us that you do not speak a language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.97.205 (talk) 12:08, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Tremolo arms
I've just answered some old questions at Talk:Tremolo arm, have a look if it's still an issue! Andrewa (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Schistosome20043-300.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Schistosome20043-300.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:KIAA0319_Protein20154-300.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:KIAA0319_Protein20154-300.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Progeria20132-300.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Progeria20132-300.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Progeria37-72.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Progeria37-72.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Rhodnius_prolixus70-300.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Rhodnius_prolixus70-300.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:11, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Correcting errors is nonsense?!
So ... you're not supposed to correct a movie stub that lists the wrong actor in the lead because it's "nonsense"? Boy, is my face ever red. Thanks for the heads up! 69.242.225.132 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC).

Neuroleptic
Neuroleptic is a pretty cool word.

Image problem
While patrolling new image I see that you seem to have forgotten to add a copyright tag to File:My edits per day.PNG. On the assumption that you know what to do, I have not nominated for deletion. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 03:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Henry Opukahaia
Hello, I noticed you added some redirects about this person. I am developing a full article (as time permits) since he is a very notable person (although spelled very many different ways - have you been following the Hawaii manual of style arguments?). The article about his current place of burial is almost ready, see User:W Nowicki/Kahikolu Church. Still trying to find a good picture of his painting. He has a web site, http://www.obookiah.com/Obookiah.com Aloha. W Nowicki (talk) 16:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Platypus20050-300.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Platypus20050-300.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 20:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * NOTE: I contacted the photographer Dr. Nicole Duplaix at his personal web site's E-mail address (ndparis@aol.com) on the license for this image and here was his answer dated to November 2, 2009:
 * "I Doctor, Nicole Duplaix, the copyright owner, do NOT repeat DO NOT release the rights of this single image of a platypus taken personally by me here: http://www.genome.gov/pressDisplay.cfm?photoID=20050 into the public domain."


 * Since Dr. Duplaix is not an employee of the Federal Government, the image is not in the public domain. Hence, it should be deleted from wikipedia as soon as possible...before Dr. Duplaix's rights are infringed upon further. (I was hoping the Doctor would license it freely so that it could be moved to WikiCommons...but he totally refused so Wikipedia can't use it.) Sorry, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eliphalet Adams Bulkeley
A tag has been placed on Eliphalet Adams Bulkeley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alastair Rae (talk) 15:35, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Electricflag.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Electricflag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD
I've nominated List of former Jews, List of former Christians, and List of former Muslims together for deletion: Articles for deletion/List of former Jews.Kitfoxxe (talk) 17:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Gzuckier! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current  article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Walt Arfons -
 * 2) Gianni Motta -
 * 3) Lorraine Day -

Proposed deletion of Daniel Southern (evangelist)


The article Daniel Southern (evangelist) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable individual lacking GHit and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> ttonyb (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Looking for Wikipedia Ambassadors
Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you are listed as a Wikipedian associated with Harvard. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at schools in Boston and Cambridge (including Harvard), which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you live near Boston and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.

If you're an experienced and active Wikipedian, you might be interested alternatively in becoming an Online Ambassador. The role of Online Ambassadors is to serve as mentors for students; it doesn't require any in-person outreach. Take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Cowznofski for deletion
The article Cowznofski is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cowznofski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:34, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Thimbleislands.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thimbleislands.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Kelly hi! 22:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 14:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Grapevinefoliage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Grapevinefoliage.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:CHAIN TOOL ANNOTATED.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CHAIN TOOL ANNOTATED.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Kelly hi! 14:35, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Southern (evangelist)


A tag has been placed on Daniel Southern (evangelist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 18:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Southern (evangelist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Southern (evangelist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Southern (evangelist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 06:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Daniel Southern (evangelist)
Hello, I noticed that Daniel Southern (evangelist) has been nominated for deletion and was wondering if you wouldn't mind voting to Keep Michael Bruggink in exchange for my voting to Keep Daniel Southern (evangelist). Kthapelo (talk) 20:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Category:Talmud rabbis of the Land of Israel
You contributed to the recent discussion at WP:Cfd. The closing editor recommended that a discussion be started on a new name and we should seek consensus there before proceeding to Cfd again. I've opened such a discussion on Category:Talmud rabbis of the Land of Israel and invite you to participate. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:13, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Blast from past: Blind Lemon Jefferson
Several years ago, you made a large edit, mostly unreferenced to the article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blind_Lemon_Jefferson&diff=28691706&oldid=27792889

It stated that BLJ wrestled (for $), and stated it was considered proof of eyesight. In point of fact, wrestling is one sport in which the blind can compete with the sighted. This is common knowledge, at least among wrestlers. I've seen it myself. Some coaches blindfold wrestlers in practice as a learning tool. The misstatement will now be removed. Cheers. Tapered (talk) 06:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Revisiting a stale issue
In an under-construction essay -- WP:Delegitimization as a tactic -- I mentioned two stale examples. I hoped that very old illustrative examples would be non-controversial. You may have forgotten a minor 2007 dispute, but I selected something you wrote in that long-ago context. Will you take a look at this:
 * Delegitimization is a term used to describe is a kind of personal attack which is damaging to the work of building an encyclopedia, e.g.,
 * Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, 2007 Group delegitimization. "Nobody argues about "the gay cabal" pushing their agenda on Wikipedia. Nobody tries to delegitimize edits as the product of "the conservative cabal" or "the liberal cabal" .... People can post according to whatever points of view they want, but anybody mentioning a '  Z    cabal ' or similar is too paranoid ...." (emphasis added))

Does this example make sense to you? Do you have a problem with this use of your words? Is the illustrative purpose served well enough? --Tenmei (talk) 17:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * If you have the time, please take a look at WP:Delegitimization as a tactic (and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Delegitimization as a tactic). Criticism of the essay is derisive. If I had used this term in a dispute context, the knee-jerk response would have marginalized the observation without addressing its substance. My purpose in writing the essay was to help convert this into a wiki-term.  I only recently learned this word, and I want to be able to use it. In effect, I want to legitimize its use; but first, I need to mitigate the derision which is likely to follow. The best part of the article is the examples -- particularly the one from you.  Despite the complaint that the writing is "garbled", I would have thought that the sentences with citation support and two examples are valid and useful? Do you have a point of view which helps me figure out how to respond constructively to MfD criticism?  --Tenmei (talk) 19:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Redmaple.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Redmaple.jpg, which you've sourced to Self. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc  powwow  16:43, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Response ZT


A tag has been placed on Response ZT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Center for American Unity


The article Center for American Unity has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * There is no evidence of notability, and no independent sources. In fact, it could probably be speedy-deleted, as there is no claim of significance.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Elton Bunny (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 09:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

Possibly unfree File:Hirambinghamivstamp.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hirambinghamivstamp.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Whiskey Tango


A tag has been placed on Whiskey Tango, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

''not sure if this is the right method, but there's no evidence on the article being redirected to (White Trash) that supports this redirect. Somehow when I was trying to propose a deletion it jumped to the article page.''

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jonathanfu (talk) 03:48, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Copenhagentin.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Copenhagentin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:11, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Copenhagentin.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Copenhagentin.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 05:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Islands in Westcheater county
Hi. I noticed that you creates the articles on the various islands that makeup the Thimble Islands in Connecticut. I have previously worked on several articles about islands in New Rochelle, NY such as "goose island", "pine island", "echo island" and "Clifford island", all of which are notable landforms and recognized geographic features. The articles were well sourced and well structured but were automatically erased by an administrator who asserted that they were the creation of a 'banned user' ( and i was labeled as the nlocked user abusing new accounts and immediately blocked from contributing to Wikipedia etc.) I have no relation to the other user in question and dont deserve to be blocked from participating in editing Wikipedia. I figured that since you seem to be a longtime contributor and are the creator or articles similar in subject matter, content, and location, you might be able to advise me on how to proceed. I would be happy to share the articles with you to see firsthand. I hope to hear back thanks --Franklinstation (talk) 22:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Figoni et Falaschi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ensemble (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 10:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Talbot-Lago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottsdale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel P. Kessler


The article Daniel P. Kessler has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Insufficient notability for WP:Academic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of George W. Sams, Jr. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George W. Sams, Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/George W. Sams, Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 22:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Deletion nomination of File:Aplysia66-300.jpg
Hi. It appears that an image file you originally uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aplysia66-300.jpg, is a copyright violation and the image has now been nominated for deletion. If you disagree with this proposed deletion, please visit the nomination page at and present your argument as to why you feel the image should not be removed from Commons. Please note that I have identified the image's original copyright holder and have verified that he has not released the image under any license suitable for use on Wikimedia Commons. If you are able to confirm some other individual as the copyright holder, please present your findings as soon as possible on the file's deletion discussion page (mentioned above). Thank you. KDS 4444 Talk  07:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, also, have you considered archiving this talk page? It's getting pretty long!  Just a suggestion.  KDS 4444  Talk  22:15, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

File permission problem with File:Gibbon74-300.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gibbon74-300.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Global account
Hi Gzuckier! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Evil purpose listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Evil purpose. Since you had some involvement with the Evil purpose redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acquanetta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montgomery County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Basso (bicycles)


A tag has been placed on Basso (bicycles) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  Velella Talk 13:57, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Firebushfoliage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Firebushfoliage.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Locustfoliage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Locustfoliage.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:36, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Motif Number 1, Rockport.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Motif Number 1, Rockport.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Winterberry1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Winterberry1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:04, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Virginiacreeper.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Virginiacreeper.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:12, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sam Chachoua for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Chachoua is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sam Chachoua until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 10:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Gun-grabbers listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gun-grabbers. Since you had some involvement with the Gun-grabbers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Everymorning (talk) 03:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

John A. G. Davis copyright problem
I have removed some of the content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://libguides.law.virginia.edu/c.php?g=39984&p=253974, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

reliable sources are stil required
piling on bad sources doesn't make it better. Sometimes some topics just can't be developed at the same speed as others. Have a look at the history of Slender Man to see how you have to wait for the sources to arrive. Serendi <sup style="color:#bb0000;">pod ous  01:56, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Southern (evangelist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Southern (evangelist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Southern (evangelist)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Two c's in a k for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Two c's in a k is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Two c's in a k until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheDracologist (talk) 00:23, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pocket Bicycles


The article Pocket Bicycles has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

I noticed you are a beginner-level JavaScript programmer...
I found you listed at Category:User js-1 (probably because you posted the corresponding userbox on your user page), and thought you might be interested in improving your skills by getting involved with developing user scripts, hobnobbing with other JavaScript programmers, and organizing and improving JavaScript articles and support pages.

We do all of that and more at the JavaScript WikiProject.

Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.

For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.

The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library.

If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.

Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 16:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Please claim your upload(s): File:Activation2.JPG
Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as own, amending the information added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add  to the Media by uploader or Presumed self tag(s) if  present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the information where appropriate).

IF you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created [ here].

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transferred to Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Grey Baskerville has left the building
After surviving AfDs, Doug Thorley and Magoo are still up, but both could use better sourcing. I'm wondering if you've got back issues of Hot Rod, Car Craft, National Dragster, & the like that would help. Ditto on Jake, Showboat, The Mantaray, Ed Donovan, Donovan hemi, Silhouette, and a few others I've created lately. (Have a look at my userpage under the "Open Vanity" 3&4.) Any help you can be would be very much appreciated. TREKphiler <sup style="font-family: cursive; color: #880085;">any time you're ready, Uhura  00:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chip Limehouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Citadel ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Chip_Limehouse check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Chip_Limehouse?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Artificial person, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mechanical ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Artificial_person check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Artificial_person?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

"Holocaust restitution" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Holocaust restitution. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 06:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kim (1950 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chela.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Rick Perry 2012 presidential campaign into Use of nigger in proper names. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I did not know that. Thanks, I shall attribute. Gzuckier (talk) 03:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Cowznofski for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cowznofski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cowznofski& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Moser Cicli


The article Moser Cicli has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG, WP:NSPORTS and WP:SIGCOV due to lack of sources to demonstrate otherwise with no change since 2010."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 02:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of European Aleph Institute for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Aleph Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/European Aleph Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Longhornsg (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Wich" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wich&redirect=no Wich] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. BD2412 T 00:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)