User talk:Hewhoamareismyself/Archive 2

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list
Hello Hewhoamareismyself! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
 * This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello Hewhoamareismyself:

WikiProject AFC is holding a  month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Posted by on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive
 Hello Hewhoamareismyself:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (t) (c) by &#123;&#123;U&#124;&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:41, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm responding to the rejection of the Yun Mu Kwan article. I am not sure what the criticism of it was. Perhaps I am not sufficiently familiar with how one navigates around wikipedia but, basically, I am not able to find the critical comments that need to be addressed. Can you give me some guidance as to where to look or what the issues are specifically? Thanks. S. W. Mirsky 23:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swmirsky (talk • contribs)

I cant find any comments that detail the issue with the submission. Can you please clarify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pena.christian (talk • contribs) 21:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I cant find any comments that detail the issue with the submission. Can you please clarify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pena.christian (talk • contribs) 21:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Poor Man's ACD
Thanks for the clarification.

Removed the Wikipedia source and added two other sources referencing the term. Pena.christian (talk) 21:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC) pena.christian

Okauchee Lions Club
The Okauchee Lions Club is more important than most of the other Lions Clubs in the world because they are one of the few Clubs to own and run their own park. This article also is better written and more important than the Oconomowoc (film), Phantom vibration syndrome, Aglet, Mad Tea Party ride in Disneyland, Shoo Fly Don’t Bother Me, and many more Articles. This article is also more informational and has good resources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tschick1 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Abel Laureano
Saw your decline of this one - I think you meant "unreferenced" rather than "blank"? Thanks.--ukexpat (talk) 15:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear Hewhoamareismyself,

Thanks for your feedback. I am new to Wikipedia and learning as I go.

I am in the process of doing some further research to edit my project article on Fishing Charters. It has been difficult to find quality none-commercially linked & verifiable content for reference sources. Published books tend to just lead to sales page. I hope that using government publications on the industry will have sufficient authenticity.

It is this lack of accessible general knowledge that led me to believe an article on Fishing Charters would be a worthwhile addition to Wikipedia alongside Fishing and Fishing Vessels.

I hope to re-submit during the next week.

Any advice would be welcome.

Regards, Deep End Fishing (talk) 23:05, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference Intakes
Thanks for your comments on the draft article "Reference Intakes". I've made a couple of changes, and hope this is now acceptable. Norman21 (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Inline URLs
"Please see the denial notice that was posted by Timtrent just 10 hours ago. Please remove all inline URLs"

Dear Hewhoamareismyself, I thought I had removed all inline URLs. Can you please tell me which I have missed? (I now removed two links that were directing towards an insittucional repository, for fear of that being considered "inline URL).

Bramblebough 01:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)BrambleboughBramblebough 01:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bramblebough (talk • contribs)

Review of ...And Jesus Moonwalks the Mississippi
Hey there, I noted your review of the article linked above at. I'm curious about what went into your decision to decline based on our neutrality policy since I didn't have any issues with the language. I don't think there were any neutrality issues with the article as it was written. I've also gone ahead and published that article, if you'd like to contest my decision. Let me know and all the best, Blurpeace  05:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I also just got another user who joined about your review of Draft:Kevin Williams. I'd say it's probably best to publish and tag the article for inline style issues, rather than declining it and having it potentially indefinitely languish in the draft namespace.


 * I noticed that you just recently picked up editing again and that you've made 1,000 edits just this month. Given it's only been 8 days and the bulk of your work has been reviewing article drafts, maybe it'd be a good idea to take things a little slower and really contemplate each individual article?


 * I don't say that to be condescending or anything. Just that we only get one chance to do reviews right and every mistake counts pretty heavily. That also isn't to say nobody can make a mistake, but it might be a good idea to take it slow while you're just getting a handle of things again. Of course, if I have any other issues, I'll make sure to engage you directly and note specifically what's wrong. Wishing all the best and welcome back to the project man. Blurpeace  08:06, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Review of Draft:Camargo Society
Hi there, I wound up at Draft:Camargo Society while reviewing another draft by the same editor. You flagged this for notability -- in cases like this, which look notable but need better sources, I prefer to try to add a few sources. This was super-easy in this case: There's in fact a Britannica article (and anything covered by another encyclopedia is notable). Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 18:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

JohnHeggelund, Journal of Applied Research on Children article deletion
I am an intern with Children at Risk, the company publishing the Journal of Applied Research on Children. They asked me to create a wikipedia page using the information from their website. Do they need to write an entirely new summary of the journals just to have a wiki page and a website?

Sorry, this all makes perfect sense. I was frustrated because my job was made less simple. Thank you for doing yours.

--JohnHeggelund (talk) 12:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

I was wondering, would it be appropriate to cite one of the journal issues' call for papers in order to write an "About the Journal" section?

I am also considering citing some of the articles from the journal itself in order to write about the journal's focus, and some of the websites that have collected the articles to advocate for policy to support my claim that journal provides research for new policy. For example: This website has collected articles on teen pregnancy and This article has collected more general articles for state policy Do these sound like appropriate sources for my intention? -- Thank you for your time, JohnHeggelund (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Video killed the radio star
I suspect that editor will require watching. It looked to me very much like a fit of pique because I replaced the reviews that they deleted. Fiddle  Faddle  22:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Kenn Davis Draft
Thank you for your comments on the draft. Sorry for my inexperience. Unfortunately, I have had a hard time finding better sources online. There are a few commercial third-party art-related websites that discuss Kenn Davis work but mostly they just recycle material from the sources I quote. I would formally satisfy your requirement by quoting these third-party websites instead of his website but I feel this would be intellectually dishonest as it defies the purpose of your comment. I understand that Wikipedia generally discourages citing the person's website since people themselves may have an incentive to oversell their importance. But this primary source is also most accurate and informative because the person (or in this case his surviving family) knows best about himself. Moreover, I do not quote his website as proof of notability. Rather, I mostly use it as a source of biographic facts. His notability (as defined by Wikipedia guidelines) is established by his substantial work as author of quite a number of mystery novels and repeated nominations for the most important prize in this genre, the Edgar Award. Currently I work on getting hard-copies of newspaper articles discussing his exhibitions. But this will be matter of weeks or months with uncertain success because it involves searching through dusty newspaper archives that are off-line. Moreover, I speculate that once the article would be up, other people may contribute more material and better sources currently unknown to me. Perhaps one brute-force solution is to delete everything in the article that cites primary sources. But this would make the article less informative and thus less useful to the reader.

To sum up, I am not quite sure how I can satisfy your request soon in a meaningful way. At the same time, I am quite sure that this person meets Wikipedia's notability standards. There are numerous articles on what I would consider less notable people in Wikipedia. What to do? Bcschipper (talk) 08:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

My submission on June the 11th - Sonar Flow Meter
Hello all...

My article was not approved and I have NO idea why... I don't see direct comments as to the reason of the decline, all I see are pages and pages of links which are EXTREMELY confusing! Please tell me what I need to do and I will be happy to do it to get my article approved.

Looking foreword to hearing from you Sylviahaidar (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

National Centre For Excellence
HI Hewhoamareismyself, The AFC 'National Centre For Excellence' has been declined due to one reason for a long time that is, referencing. Pls help me in getting me some refrences for my page. Thank You, Rahulmdinesh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahulmdinesh (talk • contribs) 16:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Skins Character - Abigail Stock
hi, the article is based on an established source which provides the synopsis - it's the same standard as the other characters, such as primary character Tony Stonem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Stonem) and his corresponding Skins Wiki entry (http://skins.wikia.com/wiki/Tony_Stonem). can you please advise what else is necessary for this specific case? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skins4u2 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The established article has otherwise reliable sources talking about the character to establish notability in culture, which yours lacks. The synopses do not need citing persay. he who  am  are  is myself  18:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

I need help on getting notable sources for me but i don't know what to do:( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maniac1992 (talk • contribs) 04:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Victor_A.(Beaude)_Sahm_III
Hello, Thank you for your feedback. This bio page holds much esteem in the grain industry, unfortunately, there are not a lot of sources outside of what I have noted- which are global publications. We receive many requests for Beaude's bio and we would like to use the wikipedia page as a referral for press. You state, "Most of your references are merely lists that say he exists or that he donated to such and such charity, we need more sourcing that directly talks about the person at hand, articles discussing his work to prove he is notable." The references to his patents and management profile should suffice, do you need more? If so, please be specific. Thanks! Raw.designer (talk) 15:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Normally a patent does not have the same weight as any sort of third party article. There are a lot of patents that aren't notable for Wiki because they don't much coverage outside of the patent. Notability is almost exclusively determined by news coverage. Hope this helps! he who  am  are  is myself  16:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

remotely fueled spacecraft propulsion
Article rejection. Oh I feel dumb. Forgot the reference code in the reference section.

Matthewhburch (talk) 01:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Draft on the Sustainable Energy Utility (SEU): Request for assistance
Dear Hewhoamareismyself,

Thank you for your review of my draft article on the Sustainable Energy Utility (SEU) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sustainable_Energy_Utility_%28SEU%29).

I have since edited my contribution to Wikipedia in an attempt to more closely reflect Wikipedia style guidelines. However, I struggle with the reformulation of my article away from an essay style contribution and towards an article drafted with encyclopaedic writing style. I was hoping that you could potentially offer some examples of where in my draft the style is clearly in the wrong style and, hopefully, how it could be rewritten. That way, I'd have some practical examples on how to rewrite my draft in case my newest resubmission gets rejected again. I have tried to use the Wikipedia chat function but, unfortunately, to no avail.

I hope you can help me out.

Energycommons (talk) 14:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Kind regards, Energycommons

Draft on Media Technology and Society Notability
Thanks for your comments on my article submission Hewhoamareismyself! I'm a Wikipedia novice so I appreciate any help. I understand that Amazon and Google Books alone are not evidence of notability, but the Amazon page for the book has a citation section that lists 80 books that have cited this book. I was under the impression that with that many secondary, independent citations of this book plus my citation that mentioned the book of the year award from the Journal of the Association for History and Computing, that this book would be considered notable enough for inclusion. And my understanding of notability is that it is a feature of the subject and does not necessarily need to be established in the article itself as long as it is somewhat traceable from the citations? What do you think? Thanks again for any help with this! Evanharmon (talk) 17:41, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Shinji Takeda
Hi. Thanks for reviewing my Shinji Takeda draft :). I've edited the links. Transwiki looks complicated :S, is there a way to mention the jp article other than on the talk page? Msmarmalade (talk) 03:55, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Rereview
Just to let you know others beg to differ on your fail reason. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation. It is clearly ad-like and seeks to promote that brand, having probably been written by the owner. It is likely to never be accepted. If you are prone to accept articles such as this one, I suggest you seriously read up on notability criteria and practise reviewing more carefully. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, As a GrillsWith is a thing, I am confused regarding your casting it as a neologism. Can you help me understand? Jorosama (talk) 23:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

01:41:09, 8 July 2014 review of submission by ScrantchMan
Is there any way to use magazine articles that have not been published online as a reference/citation?

ScrantchMan (talk) 01:41, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

01:49:56, 8 July 2014 review of submission by ScrantchMan
Can you please provide more direction on what areas/topics/statements need to be references or citations?

Thanks. ScrantchMan (talk) 01:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

ScrantchMan (talk) 01:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

17:04:29, 11 July 2014 review of submission by Confession Procession
Can you be more precise as to why my article was declined? I'm a little lost as to what you are looking for. Thank you.

Confession Procession (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

== 17:07:14, 11 July 2014 review of submission by Confession Procession ==

Can you be more specific as to what you are looking for from my article? I'm a little lost as to how to improve upon it. Thank you. Confession Procession (talk) 17:07, 11 July 2014 (UTC) Confession Procession (talk) 17:07, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposal re June BED
There is a proposal at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/June_2014_Backlog_Elimination_Drive that merits your consideration Fiddle   Faddle  16:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:41, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:09, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;&#125;&#125; to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list

Interview for The Signpost
This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Articles for creation

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for creation for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (pitch)  @ 09:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

19:13:10, 10 January 2015 review of submission by Wernerburklin
I was surprised to have been declined. What else do I need to do? Wernerburklin (talk) 19:13, 10 January 2015 (UTC)


 * You have no listed sources. We can never, ever, under any means accept unsourced material on Wikipedia, or sourcing that comes from unreliable sources. This is the very basis of Wikipedia content if we want to remain factual, and it was listed as the issue when I first failed the article 6 months ago, and again today. Please read the comments we give. They're there for a reason. he who  am  are  is myself  00:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Request on 01:54:11, 2 July 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Sociojohn
Hi! You reviewed an article of mine a few months ago and I have made some edits. I wondered if you could look at the article "Barbell Shrugged" and make some suggestions. Thanks!

Sociojohn (talk) 01:54, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)