User talk:Hunter Kahn/Archive 2

Damien
User:Alastairward doesn't see enough notability of Damien. Could u check that out? Talk:List_of_South_Park_episodes --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 19:05, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The Coon
Fair enough, I just consider it a bit much to list every item that someone mentions with regards an episode. Is it really a cultural reference? It's just a plot point to me, they visit a real life locale. They do so many times in episodes. I just didn't see the extra value of knowing that this time, they didn't make up the name. Alastairward (talk) 10:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

The Coon review
Sure, I don't mind. Although I'm a bit busy today so I won't have time to review it until tomorrow. — The Le ft orium  14:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for The Coon
Shubinator (talk) 05:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Congrats! :) Cirt (talk) 05:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for New Boss (The Office)
Shubinator (talk) 21:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

South Park articles
Thank you for your diligence in upgrading the South Park articles! Keep up the good work. -- The Red Pen of Doom  16:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 30 March 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
 * Special report: Community weighs license update
 * News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
In addition, you may use the userbox located at User:Drilnoth/Userboxes/GAN backlog elimination drive to indicate your participation on your user page. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T • C) 21:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films March 2009 Newsletter
The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Possible GA Nomination
Hey, there! I noticed you were reviewing an article related to the Simpsons; do you reckon Bart the Fink is ready for GA? If not, could you give me a list of improvements that I could make? Thanks! Cheers.  I 'mperator 00:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Want to review it now? :D Cheers.  I 'mperator 00:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoops...didn't mean to pressure you :P Thanks for the suggestions, btw! Cheers.  I 'mperator 01:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 6 April 2009 ==


 * Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
 * News and notes: Statistics, Wikipedia research and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
 * Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject China
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Damien (South Park)
Hello. I have added a few changes to the article you were working on. So far, all I did was basic clean-up and minor improvements to the article. It appears to be almost-ready for GA status. I justed wanted to hear a second opinion about the article. Also I'd like to point out a few issues with the article; the 'Home video release' and 'Cultural references' sections seem to be a tad short in length compared to the rest of the article. Should I merge the cultural references section with the theme section? Cheers, &mdash;Alastor Moody 06:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know, I responded on my talk page. Also I'm gonna go ahead and nominate it for GA now; just a heads up. &mdash;Alastor Moody 04:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I can wait. &mdash;Alastor Moody 04:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I guess co-nomination would be fine with me, since looking at the history it indicates that I have also contributed to the article. &mdash;Alastor Moody 04:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, I guess I could give it a try, but I'll have to re-watch the episode (at southparkstudios.com) since I've partially forgot about it. It might take some time however you can help along as well. &mdash;Alastor Moody 06:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoa dude! Holy crap that is a lot of info. I'm in the process of re-watching the episode though. &mdash;Alastor Moody 06:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't think that we jump to conclusions quickly, but after seeing that you have added a lot of info that comes close to meeting most of the FA criteria, I want to make a few suggestions as to how we should deal with the article when its done.


 * Option 1: We go ahead as initally planned to nominate it as a GA.
 * Option 2: We request a peer review for the article, and later nominate it for FA (skipping GA status).
 * Option 3: We proceed with Option 1 first, and continue on with Option 2.

These are simply my ideas as to what to do. I won't press you do follow my suggestions. If you don't agree with my suggestions, I'll just forget about them. Either way is fine with me though. :) &mdash;Alastor Moody 06:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, we'll go with Option 1. Also I have shortened the plot section down to 309 words. I already co-nominated the article for GA. Cheers, &mdash;Alastor Moody 08:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Weight Gain 4000
Hello again; I have reviewed the article you have nominated for GA. I believed that it meets the GA criteria under my judgement, so I passed it. Congrats! :) &mdash;Alastor Moody 08:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Two Weeks (The Office)
I have reviewed the article you nominated for GA. I checked the article in accordance with the GA criteria and I believe that the article meets GA standards. I have passed it and listed it as another GA. Congrats! :) &mdash;Alastor Moody 05:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo
I've seen you've nominated another article for GA. If you want, I'll review it for you. &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 04:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Damien (South Park)
I have started the GA review here. I will finish it later today or tomorrow. — The Le ft orium  16:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello. The Leftorium left (pun not intended) us a review about the article, and I have fixed about most of the issues he listed out. What I could use is some help fixing the last remaining issues with the article. Afterwards, I'll go inform the Leftorium so he can finish up the review. Cheers, &mdash;Alastor Moody 02:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * True. Stayed tuned until this July 17. :) &mdash;Alastor Moody 03:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi. I'm bored, got anything to do? &mdash;Alastor Moody 03:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No problemo. ;)  The Le ft orium  13:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Imaginationland
Just wondering how you felt about this: about eighteen months ago, there was a merge discussion to merge all three episodes in the trilogy into one, which failed. Given the episode's treatment as a split telemovie at the Emmys, do you reckon there could be cause for a (new discussion about) merging? Sceptre (talk) 06:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * In season 11, there was officially a total of 14 episodes. However if they (whoever they are) insist on merging the Imaginationland trilogy in one article, then they should also merge the Cartoon Wars and Go God Go series together as well. But, I am opposed of combining epsiodes into one article. The wikiproject is currently running a featured topic drive which should take care of it. Cheers, &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 07:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I was one of the ones who prefered the merge (along with Cartoon Wars and Go God Go). It's not really rare for television episodes to be split over two or three production codes, mind you. Sceptre (talk) 08:16, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Personally, I tend to agree with you Sceptre. I'd say it should be one episode and, instead of one large plot summary, there would be three separate plot sections for each episode. As long as the article points out that the Imaginationland consists of three episodes from the 11th season, I don't think there's any harm in combining them. In fact, I think keeping them separate would probably mean a lot of the came information about production, awards, video release, etc. would be repeated in each one, and I'd rather have one big quality article than three redundant ones. So yeah, I think the merge is a good idea; you might want to ask for feedback from other people in the South Park featured topic drive as well. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( contribs )  14:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Peer review of Bale Out
I have nominated the article Bale Out for a peer review. Comments would be appreciated at the subpage, Peer review/Bale Out/archive1. Thank you for your time, Cirt (talk) 10:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 13 April 2009 ==


 * License update: Licensing vote begins
 * News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
 * Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Applause

 * No problem, but how did you manage to find all those sources? Also, I could help out if it's no problem.-- Music 26/  11  18:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I see what I can do, if you don't mind I will problaby sometimes contact you if I'm looking for sources.-- Music 26/  11  21:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If you have any sources regarding nielsen ratings, critical reception, and possibly writing and inspiration, that would be a great help. I really feel like I'm bothering you with this, if that's true just say so. Oh, and I left two comments on the FAc page for "Damien". Thanks.-- Music 26/  11  13:19, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh sorry, stupid of me to forget to mention the episode title, I'm workin on "Volcano".-- Music 26/  11  17:53, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, take your time.-- Music 26/  11  17:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, I don't want to make you hurry or anything, but it has been a few days, and I don't have that much to go on, so if you find any sources please send me a message. Thanks.-- Music 26/  11  15:26, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Fishsticks (South Park)
Hello. I know you probably wouldn't prefer me to review nominated GA articles, however due to the increasing backlog at WP:GAN and that you nominated have 7 articles waiting for reviews, I'd decided to give a helping hand to just one of them. I gave a review to the Fishsticks episode here. I think you should go and take a look there. Other than that, I'd like to compliment on your ability to get that article ready for GA when it only aired like 5/6 days ago. Cheers, :) &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 08:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Eat, Pray, Queef
I have reviewed the article here. — The Le ft orium  15:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Wench Trouble
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

Trey Parker's images
Hi, don't decorate every article by Parker's picture like you did in the new article of South Park. Use free images with wise. Thanks. --85.140.47.123 (talk) 13:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Also there is a rule for icons WP:ICONDECORATION and I sure there is a rule for images. You advanced user and you know wp rules better that me. So, don't decorate, see other articles of SP episodes, there isnt "Trey Parker's face" in all articles. Check it. --85.140.47.123 (talk) 13:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Street newspaper, which you completed the GA review of, was recently promoted to FA status. I wouldn't have been able to get it there without your help and comments; you deserve a  if you want it! r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 00:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Dream Team (The Office)
== Wikipedia Signpost : 20 April 2009 ==


 * Book reviews: Reviews of The Wikipedia Revolution
 * Wikipedia by numbers: Wikipedia's coverage and conflicts quantified
 * News and notes: New program officer, survey results, and more
 * Dispatches: Valued pictures
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Film
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

GA
I've passed Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo as a GA. Congrats! Cheers.  I 'mperator 15:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem! In fact, I was going to suggest doing a WP:FAC after a general sweep-through :P Cheers.  I 'mperator 17:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

The Office GT
Since you seem to be interested in this show you might want to take a quick look at:

I was going to work on it a few months ago but I got bored of it and ditched it. Nergaal (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Damien (South Park)
Hi, I left a comment at the review. It was the best I felt I could add, I see your point (and theirs too I suppose). I would echo your suggestion that the images don't really do well in any TV article, when you've seen the moving image or you're talking about one that you haven't seen, a picture doesn't really cut it.

The comments left in support of two example images given on the review page seemed (to me) to be important not because of the image itself, but of the moment in the show that it is taken from. Grabbing a frame, to me does not imply a greater understanding.

I would give it support if I could, but I thought it best to weigh in with whatever opinion I could best support in writing, which was to say that at the very least, your image was no less important than the others. Hopefully that will stir opinion somewhat. Alastairward (talk) 22:37, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Damien
I replied on my talk page. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 22:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Damien South Park and Omen.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Damien South Park and Omen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 01:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

re Damien (South Park)
I see you removed the other image. I think a strong case could be made that the infobox image is relevant, but you might want to ask the people that commented about it at the FAC if there would be a different image from the episode that could be more relevant. Cirt (talk) 01:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Re Charlotte Lewis
Thanks for the review and quick response! Sanders11 (talk) 10:00, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Pinewood Derby (South Park)
Hello. Someone by the alias of has created a review page (see history) for the article you've very recently nominated for GA. Just decided to let you know about it or give you a head's up on how the article's doing. &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 23:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem. Keep up the good work.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  13:00, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Dream Team (The Office)
I have reviewed the article here. :)  The Le ft orium  22:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Inauguration of Barack Obama/archive2‎
I am surprised you have not commented at Featured article candidates/Inauguration of Barack Obama/archive2‎. We could use some feedback.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: The Michael Scott Paper Company
Hey Hunter, what's up? Its no problem at all, I'm looking forward to reviewing the article, since that was a very funny episode. :) Hey, you reviewed Ethan Hawke, which I truly appreciate, I'm doing you a favor as well. :) I'll have the review done by today. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  15:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, just doing my job. Oh, well thank you for making the change. --  ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oops, I'm sorry. I had no idea I did that. I was probably on a rush that day, that I accidentally removed it from the nomination page. Again, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to do that. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  14:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 27 April 2009 ==


 * Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
 * News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
 * WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Great job!
Just wanted to say great job on the South Park GAs. I like how you are improving the newer eps. SP needs a few editors like you, and you're most likely to draw them in with the newer ones. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 05:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films April 2009 Newsletter
The April 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:45, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Cartman Gets an Anal Probe
I am working on improving this article and I was wondering if you have access to the DVD commentary for this episode. If so, could you possibly list any relevant information on the article talk page? I can then work it into the article. If it would be less trouble, perhaps you could rip a copy of the commentary for me? (I don't know which is easier for you.) Thanks! Awadewit (talk) 06:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Damien (South Park)
Congratulations on the FA!!! Thanks so much for all the South Park work you've been doing! Cirt (talk) 19:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I just noticed that on the article alerts section, nicely done (I see you got to keep your favoured screenshot too). Alastairward (talk) 21:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Anne Donahue
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.  Syn  ergy 02:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

the lede paragraph is not exempt from WP:V
re: plse see WP:LEDECITE. -- The Red Pen of Doom  01:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

re Question about DYK
Feel free to add yourself on, nice work. :) Cirt (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

South Park (season 1)
I think I've fixed it. Thanks. :)  The Le ft orium  19:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I dunno. I think we should nominate it for GA first, then FA.  The Le ft orium  13:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've asked Scorpion0422 to withdraw the nomination.  The Le ft orium  16:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 11 May 2009 ==


 * News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
 * Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Apologies...
...are really not necessary! Good work on the SP articles so far, they've been stagnant for so long, my only contribution was scrubbing the OR from most of them in the months before I nominated them for a merge.

I just thought with regards Mr Brown that enough cites were out there that even though I too see it as a bad parody/likeness, we could still keep the material. Alastairward (talk) 17:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Celia Ammerman
Thank you for your efforts on Celia Ammerman, especially the improvements while the AFD was nearing its end. Keep up the good work. Best Regards. Plastikspork (talk) 01:12, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey :) thanks for the thanks lol. Its absolutely no problem, im glad that the page got to stay, for all the reasons I said in the AFD, and because Celia is great :D (Kyleofark (talk) 18:32, 14 May 2009 (UTC))

Halloween (The Office)
Hey, just wanted to note that this edit was intended for this article, and I went ahead and changed it. On another note, great job with the GAs that you've done with The Office articles. Another user and I had a huge GA push last year along with my FL season pages push, but lately it's died down. It's great to see that someone's still working hard on these articles. Keep up the great work! Mastrchf (t/c) 19:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Heavy Competition
I have reviewed the article here. :) Also, if you have time, please help out by reviewing other articles at WP:GAN in the "Theatre, film, dance, and drama" category. The backlog is becoming huge... :P  The Le ft  orium  20:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Second Sight (film)
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.
 * Consider using a proper citation for the youtube video rather than linking to it as the video may be in violation of some copyrights.Smallman12q (talk) 21:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Well its a gray area, but what I would have done is to have the media citation in the article, but provide the youtube link on DYK to verify. Again, I'm not fully sure myself as to whether linking to the video on DYK may also constitute a copyright violation. What you can do is ask at WP:RSN how to handle it.Smallman12q (talk) 21:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It should be enough, yes. If anyone questions me, I will provide the link then.Smallman12q (talk) 21:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I always enjoy helping corteous people. I hope that other wikipedians will reflect this as well. Do let me know what they say at RSN...I'm interested to know for future references. Cheers!Smallman12q (talk) 21:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅Ye, I've checked it off. Do have a look at the reference tools, they will come in handy for makingWP:GA. Cheers! Smallman12q (talk) 01:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Question
I don't think there is. You can probably just remove the reviewer from WP:GAN and leave a message under the nomination.  The Le ft orium  17:37, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Reviewed Broke (The Office) here.  The Le ft orium  13:21, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Allison Harvard
Would you consider doing a little bit of work on Alison Harvard. It has the opposite problem from Celia Ammerman The article is too sparse, as well as poorly written, with bad grammar and sentence structure. Writing isn't really my forte ... Misty Willows  talk  01:36, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: GA question
The best thing you could do is leave a note on the reviewer's talk page; chances are he had simply forgotten about it. If that doesn't work, a post to WT:GAN should bring in some fresh eyes. I'll watchlist the review page to keep track of further progress. Cheers, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:19, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, good luck! – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Robert duvall in tender mercies.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Robert duvall in tender mercies.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Grace After Midnight
== Wikipedia Signpost : 18 May 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Writers needed
 * Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
 * Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
 * News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

FAC
It looks like both congratulations and condolences are due today - I've archived one of your FAC nominations and promoted another. I was very impressed with your demeanor at the FAC for Tender Mercies–it is rare to find a nominator who embraces constructive criticism to that extent. I hope that when the article is renominated it will sail through. Good luck! Karanacs (talk) 21:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo
Congratulations for the FA on Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo! Cirt (talk) 21:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey :)
Hey, I dont know if you'll remember, but I helped out on the Celia Ammerman deletion discussion? :) Well, it may interest you to know that Allison Harvard is currently up for deletion. Hopefully you could check it out and give your views - be they keep or delete. Have a nice day :) (Kyleofark (talk) 19:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC))

Cool, I hope it stays. It deserves to stay. Thank you :) (Kyleofark (talk) 20:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC))

Volcano Sources?
Hi, I'm sorry but if you do not provide me with sources for "Volcano", I can't continue to work on the article and I'm affraid I must depart from the FT drive. I assume you just forgot about it, but please if you aren't in the mood to find any sources just say so. Thanks.-- Music 26/  11  14:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, I'm just glad I could finally reach you. Thanks.-- Music 26/  11  18:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, I figured you could just send me them on my talk page in a collapsible banner, like below. If there are too much, you can just send them to the adress in the banner.-- Music 26/  11  15:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for all your help, I think I'll just nominate the article as it is now. If you happen to find an article regarding the ratings, or maybe some more reviews, they can always be added later. Again, thanks.-- Music 26/  11  01:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rock Show (Parks and Recreation)
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

Re: Brush with Greatness
Yeah, I just saw that. Thanks! :) I will review a few articles this weekend as well.  The Le ft orium  13:21, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...
...and my compliments to you as well, for your much more impressive work on the seasons and episodes of South Park. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 23:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Tender Mercies
I do hope you plan to bring the article back to FAC in a couple of weeks (or whatever the conventional minimum is). I've left two queries on the article's Talk page and will be copyediting during the interim. Best regards. DocKino (talk) 21:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)