User talk:Hunter Kahn/Archive 1

Hi!
Unfortunately, I'm not much of an active contributor, so I'm not sure I'd be of much help, but you can talk to other members of WikiProject Lehigh Valley. --Wikipeep 494 (talk) 06:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Your edits to Sebastian Shaw (actor)
There's an old, archived note on my talk page asking me to improve this article. Absolutely no need for this now! Thanks. --Old Moonraker (talk) 06:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Nancy Hicks Maynard
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. emerson7 05:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * it's really not a matter of citing the source of the material. the problem is with the content is almost word for for word, paragraph by paragraph, copied from the source. --emerson7 14:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * i know it seems drastic, but wp guidelines call for either removing the copyrighted text or tagging the article for deletion....i chose the lesser of the two. when editing wikipedia articles, it is not permitted to use, or even re-wording the work of others without permission. it is fine to use facts and figures, but another thing altogether when copying the text, structure, and themes. --emerson7 15:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * hello again. i made a few more changes to the article to bring it more into compliance. since the two references provided pretty well serve as the basis for content, i didn't think inline refs were at all necessary. otherwise...article is looking pretty good. cheers! --emerson7 21:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Bep signing autographs at esu.JPG
Image:Bep signing autographs at esu.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Black Eyed Peas 2.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

FYI
Not sure if you want to add this information to 2008 Barack Obama assassination scare, or create a entire new article, but you might be interested in this. Khoikhoi 01:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Simply awesome. How long did it take you to write that article? Maybe you should add it to Template talk:Did you know or something, that was quite impressive. By the way, there was another case in Florida, but I'm not sure if it warrants its own article. Maybe right now the most notable of the assassination scares was the Denver one, but as this story continues to develop, maybe can eventually make 2008 Barack Obama assassination scare a disambig. page instead of a redirect. Thoughts? Khoikhoi 09:43, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * You could go to the talk pages of those articles as you've suggested, maybe another page is Editor assistance/Requests? I can't think of any others. Khoikhoi 06:59, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons
Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Moving images to the Commons (you may view previous uploads by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box (or see ). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 02:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Troy Eid
Thank you for creating Troy Eid. Keep up the good work, Kingturtle (talk) 03:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Hero Fiennes-Tiffin in Harry Potter preview.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Hero Fiennes-Tiffin in Harry Potter preview.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 13:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for 2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Tennessee

 * Very nice work. There are some updates on the case btw: . Khoikhoi 20:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2008 jail break in Clovis, New Mexico
An article that you have been involved in editing, 2008 jail break in Clovis, New Mexico, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/2008 jail break in Clovis, New Mexico. Thank you. Little Red Riding Hood  talk  02:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Shaw in It Happened Here.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Shaw in It Happened Here.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Shaw in It Happened Here.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Shaw in It Happened Here.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:File:Shaw in It Happened Here.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:File:Shaw in It Happened Here.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:File:Shaw in It Happened Here.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you.

The trailer is actually copyrighted. Jappalang (talk) 07:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:800px-Anakinredeemed.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:800px-Anakinredeemed.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Shaw in It Happened Here.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Shaw in It Happened Here.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 01:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Problem with DYK noms
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Nancy talk  13:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Nancy talk  13:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Reviews
I will likely not pick up another review for another week to ten days. I am anticipating a few GA on hold duties between now and then and I want to do my taxes this weekend. I would say if Lu is still in need of review ten days from now, I will take him on.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Tiger
Thanks for the tiger. Thanks for the thorough review.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Inauguration of Barack Obama
I have addressed all your concerns.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 22:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Lucian Piane

 * Congrats! Cirt (talk) 22:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Inauguration of Barack Obama
You will want to get acquainted with ArticleHistory if you are not already.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Inauguration of Barack Obama
Thank you for the editorial assistance that you gave to help improve this article. Keep up the good work as we try to take this article to WP:FA.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

The Rocketeer (film) GA review
Thanks for reviewing. I will address your comments some time tonight. Cheers. Wildroot (talk) 21:44, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Declare yourself alba ad.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Declare yourself alba ad.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ChrisiPK (talk) 08:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Jeannine Oppewall
Shubinator (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

GA review for Amy Adams
Thanks for reviewing the article. Your changes were great. Regards, Ladida (talk) 07:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar
BTW, I'm currently on vacation and I probably won't have any Internet access until Friday. If you review any more of my articles, I will get to them ASAP.  The Le ft orium  10:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Pal (dog actor)
I've followed the recommendations in the review and I believe the article is improved. Let me know what you plan to do. Please don't fail the article without discussing with me first. I'd rather "delist" the article "for further work" than let it receive a "fail" which taints an article forever. A passerby has mentioned something about a particular style of referencing. Let me know. Thanks! ItsLassieTime (talk) 13:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Wow! Thank you for the PASS on the Pal article. I'm especially thrilledbecause the Pal article is the first animal actor in the GAs! He deserves it! I've learned A LOT in bringing this article up to GA status and I have you and Maria to thank! I won't forget it and I'll put what I've learned to use in he future. Thank you again! ItsLassieTime (talk) 17:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Street newspaper
Thank you for your very in-depth review and insightful comments! I have left some responses at the review page. Best, r ʨ  ana ɢ  talk/contribs 07:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Thank you for all your help; the article has benefitted a lot from your comments! Best, r  ʨ  ana ɢ  talk/contribs 05:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for 2008–2009 arsons in Coatesville, Pennsylvania
Shubinator (talk) 01:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Clussexx Three D Grinchy Glee
Shubinator (talk) 01:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

TJ GA Review
I would like to try, thanks. And i'll fix the grammar problems, i promise. Thanks for reviewing the Jagland article :)....--This Feels Right (talk) 08:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Boldface
Hello, at Traffic (2000 film), I removed the boldface from the "Cast" section because it is better used to highlight actors and their roles when there are multiple lines of text for each person. Keeping the bold formatting as it is does nothing, really... pretty much all the actors and roles are single line, so the reader can go through them easily. If there were multiple lines like at Sunshine (2007 film), though, boldface can help the reader lock his/her eyes on each name. Hope this makes sense. — Erik (talk • contrib) 14:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Userbox for GA reviews
The userbox User Good Articles reviewed has been updated so that it can now link to a page in your user subspace where you keep track of all your GA reviews, if you have such a page. This can be done by adding a | and then the name of your user subpage (or subsection of your regular user page) wherever you have the template called. For example, on my user page I am using ""which displays as There is more information on how to do this at Template:User Good Articles reviewed.

Note: If you are not interested in doing this, you don't have to do anything; the template will still work for you exactly as it does now.

Best, r ʨ  ana ɢ  talk/contribs 17:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Hungry Like the Wolf
Hi, thanks for reviewing the article. I fix the chronology in the "Writing and recording" section, but Im not sure how to put the info in the "Music video" since there are two authors in the book. Maybe: In their 2007 book The 1980s, Bob Batchelor and Scott Stoddart described the video as lush and cinematic, with shots of jungles, rivers, elephants, cafes and marketplaces evoking the atmosphere of the film Raiders of the Lost Ark". Sorry it's a bit difficult for me to construct this sentences, since english is not my first language. Again thank for your review. Frcm1988 (talk) 19:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi again, I think it looks great. Thank you for reviewing and passing the article. Regards Frcm1988 (talk) 04:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Obama: From Promise to Power
--Dravecky (talk) 00:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Wanted (2008 film)‎‎ edits
Hunter Kahn, just wanted to let you know I reverted your recent edits to this article. I don't think many of them added much to the article. While you added many unnecessary words to the copy you also left out some necessary articles. Also, "film" is preferred over "movie" in film articles. Nothing personal, and thanks for the interest in improving articles. Jim Dunning | talk  19:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Left 4 Dead GAN
Thank you for reviewing the article so quickly, I've made the changes you suggested Skeith (talk) 04:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice job. That's a pass. --Hunter Kahn (talk) 04:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello, in this edit, I noticed that you moved many punctuation marks inside quotations, but doesn't that violate WP:PUNC (Inside or outside)? — LOL T/C 04:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Because of your lack of a response, I've undone your changes to the punctuation. — LOL T/C 20:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Obama poster
Thanks for the excellent review. I've responded to all your items.--ragesoss (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It's ready for you to take another look.--ragesoss (talk) 19:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Cindy McCain GA review
Thanks very much for the quick review. I've made the changes suggested, as described at Talk:Cindy McCain/GA1. Wasted Time R (talk) 14:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Luke Smith (writer) GAN
Thanks for noticing. I've gotten a little rusty on the GA front and simply forgot to add the tag to the talk page. It's there now :) -- Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk ) 15:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Righto. Thanks for your quick review! -- Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk ) 15:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I think i've gotten to your concerns. Unfortunately I can't beef up the chronology because they don't really mention exact dates. -- Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk ) 00:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied on the GA talk page. -- Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk ) 22:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Spider-Man: One More Day
Great, thanks! :) I'll have a look at the review momentarily. BOZ (talk) 01:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * How is it looking now? BOZ (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was a second arrangement currently unknown to the readers. :) If that's not clearly stated, post a note on the review page and we'll branstorm to make sure it reads correctly. BOZ (talk) 21:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow, cool! Well, definitely, take your time; have a read, and you can feel free to either make the final additions yourself, or pose them to us (your call). Please post a similar note on the GA review page explaining your intentions, as it seems a few other interested parties probably have the review page on their watchlist. BOZ (talk) 23:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks - I'll check it out later today. :) BOZ (talk) 16:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Your ideas seem fine, but check out Emperor's response and we'll move on from there. BOZ (talk) 05:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll have a look as soon as I can! BOZ (talk) 16:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * OK I'm happy. (Emperor (talk) 02:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC))
 * Thanks for the help - it didn't just sneak a pass so is well set for future improvement.
 * I have worked on those two articles before and the main problem is a lot of resources for them won't be online (interviews, reviews, sales figures, etc.) but the bonus is that it is more likely that they will have been featured in books (especially Carnage). I have them on my watchlist but when you are interested in improving it drop me a note (and one to WT:CMC couldn't hurt). (Emperor (talk) 03:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC))

Hey, it has been fun. :) Thanks for the helpful review, and help in getting it past the finish line! If you want sources, Peregrine Fisher is the man to ask, and of course we'd appreciate any help in getting other articles to advance to a higher quality. Hope the book was a good read, at least. :) BOZ (talk) 02:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Wanted GA
See what else is need for it to pass. igordebraga ≠ 17:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

(You've also erased the info you added about the alternate opening and ending, which was another objection of mine you addressed.)

"The film originally had both an alternate opening and an alternate ending.[33] The former, depicting the Fraternity's origins, is available on the special edition DVD.[34]" -- it is there!

And also, moved back all the info into a "Casting" section. See if it's good enough now.igordebraga ≠ 18:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

It's because I found info on most of the cast (7 out of 12), so thought it was worthy to return the info to each actor instead of a separate section. But I split again, since you think it's better this way. igordebraga ≠ 18:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Done what you've asked. igordebraga ≠ 14:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost &mdash; February 23, 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:


 * Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
 * An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
 * News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
 * Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
 * Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
 * Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
 * Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 01:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Ethan Hawke
Hi Hunter, thank you for taking the time in reviewing Ethan Hawke's article, I appreciate it. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Ice Ice Baby
Unless I'm missing something, there doesn't seem to be a GA review. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 10:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC))
 * Thank you for sending me the link. There might be a server lag on my end, but I had previously checked your contributions and didn't find it. I still can't see it on the talk page for the article itself. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC))
 * I added a description of the video. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 20:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC))

Talk:Billie Jean/GA1
Updated, best. — R  2  16:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * for the GA review.  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 11:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Miner(or) item
LOL, when I read that I didn't realize how literal you were being with that first edit.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  23:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Quick question. I see that you're changing a lot of the words that illustrate that the person spoke something specifically (stated, contend, etc.) to the word "said". Don't you think there should be some variety so that it doesn't all read the same? P.S. Thanks for the mask link. I couldn't figure out why would didn't have an article on something that seemed rather relevant (at least the way Mears was speaking of it).    BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  23:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, and I appreciate the minor copy editing that you performed as well.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  00:04, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Fastest I think I've ever experienced, as far as putting in the request and getting it reviewed. Thanks for the super-fast response time and all of the copy editing help. Cheers.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  03:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: alt.tv.simpsons
Hi. Thanks for the quick review. I have responded to your notes. --Maitch (talk) 23:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I have responded to your comments. Sorry about striking out your comments. --Maitch (talk) 05:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Two images are added. --Maitch (talk) 01:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I guess it is okay to put it in the lead. The article needs a lead image, so that would probably be the best solution.--Maitch (talk) 02:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Beyond the Sea GA
Sorry about that. I promise I will settle that tomorrow. Wildroot (talk) 07:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I've already started on my guide page for the article. Not finished yet. Thanks for supplying me with those two additional articles. Wildroot (talk) 05:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I think the article is ready. Thanks for reviewing. Wildroot (talk) 04:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for David Mendell
Shubinator (talk) 20:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Valkyrie
Regarding your recent edits, linking to territories seems like a little bit much. Per WP:OVERLINK, links should be provided "if they are particularly relevant to the topic of the article". For example, the United States and Germany could be linked, but I think that the other items are a bit much. What's your take? — Erik (talk • contrib) 02:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Otherwise, though, thank you for the other edits you have made so far! :) — Erik (talk • contrib) 02:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't see you review it! I was waiting for the review to be transcluded on the talk page. — Erik  (talk • contrib) 01:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost &mdash; 2 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:


 * Books extension enabled
 * News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
 * Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
 * Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

HIStory/Ghosts
Hey, I think I've finished. — R  2  18:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Drilnoth (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Jonathan Krohn
Right now, I don't have a computer with sound at hand, but the source doesn't immediately indicate the speech was two minutes. The wide acclaim thing seems a bit puffy and the hook might benefit from being more specific by mentioning the response in more detail by naming people and publications. On a side note: When I tried to write about this kid there were too little reliable sources, so unfortunately you beat me to it. Are you aware that he has an interest in acting too? He appeared in a Broadway Dreams performance with Adam Hunter. :) - Mgm|(talk) 12:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Ratings
I use Newsbank to find ratings. Unfortunately, I couldn't find anything about that episode as they only list the twenty most-watched shows. — The Le ft orium  16:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Question about Ratings
The ratings for that specific episode is mentioned here. Gary King ( talk ) 16:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I use NewsBank but I figure you could use a web reference instead of a print one. Gary King  ( talk ) 18:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Nancy Kavner
Hello, I have responded to all of your GA review comments about the articles, would you mind taking another look? Thanks a lot for the reviews, Scorpion 0422  00:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've asked some experts, and I don't think I'll be able to get away with a fair use lead image. I might be able to add another in the body of the article if you like. -- Scorpion 0422  19:38, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll review it. It may take me a couple of days though. -- Scorpion 0422  13:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Duvall harper hubbard tender mercies.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Duvall harper hubbard tender mercies.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Paul Schlesselman MySpace photo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Paul Schlesselman MySpace photo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
–Drilnoth (T • C) 12:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost &mdash; 9 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:


 * News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
 * Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
 * Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 23:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Jonathan krohn at cpac.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jonathan krohn at cpac.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Protonk (talk) 07:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jonathan krohn at cpac.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jonathan krohn at cpac.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  16:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Weeping Willow (Law & Order: Criminal Intent)
Sure, I will review it in a few hours. :)  The Le ft orium  10:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Review done. — The Le ft orium  13:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I'd be happy to review that one. :]  The Le ft orium  17:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

South Park
I don't know if you have the page watchlisted, but I wanted to point out that you may have misread the discussion. It was not supposed to be for all South Park episodes. The discussion was only a single part of the overall discussion. We are going through each season, one discussion at a time, and looking at each episode individually. Right now it's just a discussion on season one. The reason of my explanation can be found below your comment on the talk page.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  20:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

re: Bale Out
Okay, sounds good. Thank you for your kind words about the article Bale Out. Cirt (talk) 15:45, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not getting back to you sooner - best to keep that fair-use image only on the article about its subject itself. But I am in the process of attempting to get some other free-use images to use for these topics. Cirt (talk) 06:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Update: Now we have a free-use image. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 08:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for getting the better free-use image! Cirt (talk) 00:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I updated the article Bale Out as well, which is currently a candidate at WP:GAN. Hope it goes well :) Cirt (talk) 00:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Nah, best to get a random, previously uninvolved editor to review. Cirt (talk) 23:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for The Ring (South Park)
Shubinator (talk) 15:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

LexNex
Are you using the general lexisnexis web page when you are searching? I've tried using that search on that page and I get nothing (not just for South Park, but any of the shows I like to edit). You said you had an account, can I ask where you got it. Is it through a university, or a personal account you have? Thanks, Curiously-Interested Editor :D   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  18:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Are you using the same site that I linked above, or is it some other version? I have my university searches, but sometimes they aren't worth a damn with regard to certain subjects.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  00:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It's cool. It answered most of most question(s). Thanks.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  00:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Signpost
Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009  Unsubscribe &middot; Single-page &middot; Full edition &raquo;  — 16 March 2009


 * News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
 * Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 22:54, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Southpark...stuff
Weight Gain 4000 is looking a lot more ship shape now, thanks.

I hear that if you're googling for South Park stuff, you might come across DVD commentaries. Just as an aside, as I know you'd only do so to back up what you already legally own! ;) Alastairward (talk) 01:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * You might be interested in Masem's proposal at the bottom of the talk page, regarding sprucing up episodes.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  04:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It's no problem, or extra effort. I have/can worked alongside editors who share(d) differing opinions with me over certain aspects of both TV and Film. For the most part it's quite simple, I think it always boils down to that initial interaction over the subject matter. Sometimes the interaction goes foul (Pixelface would probably be one of those situations), and others it's just one topic of differing opinion. I find that you and I tend to have the same opinion with regard to the end result of articles, just differences among how to get to that result.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  05:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Awesome, thanks a lot for the barnstar! =)  The Le ft orium  16:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, I will review one today and one tomorrow. — The Le ft orium  14:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've been busy in real life so I haven't been able to review The Ring (South Park) yet, sorry. I will do it tomorrow. :)  The Le ft orium  16:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Tender Mercies
Don't forget to update the rationale on the image page itself. If that doesn't summary what the text beside the image states then it won't meet the criteria. Though I'm a little iffy about the inclusion of that particular image for the text describing it (i.e. why is that one so special over some other one of him in the film), I realize that finding a free image of Duvall from back in the day when he was promoting the film would be very difficult to accomplish - if not impossible. Also, as I said on the FAC page, check into doing quote boxes. They are really good for breaking up prose, and if you grab a really good quote to use they can often add to the enjoyment of reading.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  14:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Unfriendly Fire
--Dravecky (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Ring (South Park)
The article The Ring (South Park) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Ring (South Park) for things needed to be addressed.  The Le ft orium  21:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

DYK for Golden Ticket (The Office)
== Wikipedia Signpost : 23 March 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
 * Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
 * News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Commentaries
The commentaries can be found on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=south+park+commentary&search_type=&aq=0&oq=South+Park+commenta

User:Alastairward doesn't see enough notability of Damien. Could u check that out? Talk:List_of_South_Park_episodes --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 19:05, 24 March 2009 (UTC)