User talk:Hunter Kahn/Archive 5

DYK nomination of Katherine Reutter
Hello! Your submission of Katherine Reutter at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Calmer  Waters  14:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Zoooombie
Thanks Hunter! I've been really swamped with family situations at home with the holidays so I'll try to get going on these articles when I can. Thanks for your time and patience. I'll leave a message here again when I'm able to tackle it! Cheers! Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:39, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:01, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

GA
Hey, thanks for the review. If you want to learn more about Supernatural, you can review John Winchester (Supernatural) and/or Jo's mother Ellen Harvelle, lol. Either way, thanks again. Ω pho  is  14:50, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

RE:Articles for deletion/2009 Obama assassination plot in Hawaii
Hi -- just to let you know, I never nominated the two articles for deletion, somebody is trying to "put words into my mouth" -- thanks for catching this. If you see this again, please revert. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 14:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Tennessee
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Tennessee. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Tennessee. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Request
Hey, Hunter. I was wondering if it was possible for you to look up on LexisNexis to look up any ratings info on the Rugrats episode "At the Movies" I'm working on? It originally aired on Nickelodeon on 	August 25, 1991, if that helps. Thanks!  The Flash  {talk} 23:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, well thanks for looking it up anyways. Hey, you mentioned that you didn't find many, does that mean that you found some? If so, that'd be very helpful. :)  The Flash  {talk} 19:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see, lol. Well, still, that'd be greatly helpful, too — anything mentioning general production of the series can help, too, as it pertains to the series in general, and therefore, this episode (like how I used the recording session thing already in my sandbox). Thanks! :)  The Flash  {talk} 20:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, sorry to bug you again, but do you think you can find out about any ratings info for The Spectacular Spider-Man? It's a much more recent series (2008) and there will probably be more ratings info then the one I asked about earlier. Any episode would be fine, but specifically "Reaction" (orig. airdate, May 3, 2008) is the one I'm working on now. Thanks!  The Flash  {talk} 21:46, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, not to sound impatient or anything, but I haven't gotten a response yet—did you find anything on the ratings? Cheers,  The Flash  {talk} 21:44, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay, that's perfectly understandable. Thanks for trying, though. I've searched through TVBytheNumbers, but have unfortunately haven't found jack—that's kind of why I came asking you, lol.  The Flash  {talk} 23:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

hello
Thank you for your nice message. I actually thought of what you were doing but was trying to think how to do it without the disambiguation people blanking it out and turning it into a disambiguation. I even thought of naming it differently and seeing how many minutes a "Barack H Obama .....something" page would last.

About Kevin Rudd, he attracts less lightning than Barack Obama for some reason so I felt that it was easier to manage which explains what I did or didn't do. I have some ideas for genuine expansion but will need to work on it for about 2 days or so, getting references, then writing it. JB50000 (talk) 03:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Obama assassination scares may be a better title because some of them are just wackos who created a scare. Some of the incidents were not threats. Obama also includes the rest of the family, in case the incident was ambiguous.

As far as Kevin Rudd, I think the better plan is to keep the Prod tag on until the very last day because then I'll have more time to improve it. JB50000 (talk) 03:46, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

FA
I just saw that the Denver assassination article is a featured article candidate (as mentioned on the talk page) but is an archive page. Does that mean it did not pass? Or did pass? Or still pending? JB50000 (talk) 03:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

FAC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAC/ar

See above. The Denver article has failed FA. Sorry.

I did leave some comments a few minutes ago. JB50000 (talk) 04:22, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I was looking to see how to fix the talk page. The bot has fixed it about 3 minutes ago. Sorry. JB50000 (talk) 04:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Happy New Year. I read your comments. Pointy wasn't the motive. Somehow, how can we reject "other stuff exists" and go for global consideration of related articles. For example, if one band's albums is not notable, how about similar albums from the same band? JB50000 (talk) 01:35, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

That link on Timshift9's user talk page that you mentioned was completely misunderstood. This is what I wrote on that user talk page to clarify.

Hunter Kahn mistakenly thought I was threatening to delete the 2009 Barack Obama visit to China. No, I was alerting you of a similar style of article so that you could be convinced to keep both articles. Of course, such tactic could backfire and you could try to delete both of them. JB50000 (talk) 07:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by JB50000 (talk • contribs)

Parks and Recreation (season 2)
That's fine with me. I prefer it this way actually, in case the show goes on for another few seasons like The Office it will stop the main page from becoming overly long. Good work once again! SchrutedIt08 (talk) 04:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: Probably a stupid question, but...
Sure, just pick a flag :) GARDEN  20:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Right that should be you set. Your submissions page is at WikiCup/History/2010/Submissions/Hunter Kahn.  Have fun! :D  GARDEN  21:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh no, not Hunter Kahn! He'll beat us all! :-O  The left orium  21:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I see Garden hasn't replied to your rules questions, so I will. Subway (Homicide: Life on the Street) is not eligible, Parks and Recreation (season 1) is, and the good topic is (but you can only claim the topic points for the articles you did work on). I will clarify that point on the scoring page. J Milburn (talk) 01:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This question's been asked before- I've just added this line to the rules page- "You may even claim for articles within a topic that are your own work, but were promoted before 2010, providing you worked on and nominated the topic during 2010." So, short answer, yes, you may claim for all of them :) J Milburn (talk) 01:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Starting a new article
Any suggestions to starting a new article. I could start a 3 sentence article but immediately some may try to delete it. Here's the outline and working title (not necessarily the final title)

Barack Obama's Hawaii

Section 1: Early life in Hawaii

Section 2: Exact addresses of his school, his homes, all which have reliable sources. There have even been articles tracing the locations of Barack Obama's Hawaii.

Section 3: Recent ties to Hawaii: Emergency trip to see his dying grandmother in late 2008 - well covered in the news.

Section 4: Ms. Roshia's assassination scare as she travelled from Boston to Hawaii and found out the location of where they would be staying.

Section 5: Barack Obama's Christmas 2009. I saw an article today about their stay and how they tried to be low keyed.

Section 5 - part II: Barack coming out of hiding to react to the Northwest Airlines underpants bombing attempt and the CIA killing in Afghanistan. He held a news conference for the underpants bomb.

Section 6 (in the future): His other trips to Hawaii in 2010 and later

What do you think? JB50000 (talk) 03:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice but I think I'll lay off the idea for now. Maybe after section 6 is writable then I'll consider the idea. There are plenty of reliable sources for all these sections, even now. Even enough for sections 4,5 and 6 as a standalone article but probably not worth the fight to keep it from being AFD'd. JB50000 (talk) 04:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

automatically AFD proof articles
What kinds of articles are practically immune to AFDs? I think they are high schools or higher levels of education, geographical places of at least a town or larger, crash of an airplane flown by an airline where many people died. Anything else? JB50000 (talk) 02:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Forward Operating Base Chapman attack
Hello Hunter Kahn, I left a question regarding your recent DYK nomination. Kindly Calmer   Waters  06:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Jonathan Krohn GAN
Hi Hunter Khan, I reviewed your GA nominee Jonathan Krohn. Congrats on getting an image approved, though first I thought this was the Hummel kid from Glee on the pic lol Regards Hekerui (talk) 17:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, so I fixed some leftover typos and added persondata (I mean Persondata) and I'll pass this now. Congrats. Hekerui (talk) 17:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:Can I have your autograph??? ;)
No prob on both accounts. Good luck with the rest of the GTC, my first and latest one was total DOA :P  The Flash  {talk} 23:41, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Kind Request
Hi Hunter Kahn,

I am aware you are a very experienced editor with numerous contributions. However, I saw that under your profile you have a section called "Articles I made" and in it you listed 2010 Las Vegas courthouse shooting as one article you made. This is not true, I created that article, you simply moved it to a title that did not include capital letters for courthouse and shooting. I know that I created a very modest beginning of an article, but I did so nevertheless. Thus, please remove that article from your list of "articles I made" because it is on my list, I created it. Thank you. WildHorsesPulled (talk) 23:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:South park cartman gets an anal probe episode.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:South park cartman gets an anal probe episode.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:31, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

2009 Kevin Rudd visit to Japan
I submitted an AFD because there is so much opposition to it. When people keep repeating something, you can start to believe it. I am still 49.99% for keep as I think it is a notable article. Maybe even 51%, I don't know. I did put a lot of work into it. I do see a lot of points for keep but the big point for delete is that a lot of people don't want it. JB50000 (talk) 07:33, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: Parks and Recreation
Hey Hunter, what's up? Yeah, long time no talk. Yeah, I'm up for reviewing season 1. I'd been meaning to review a couple of articles anyway, but I'm glad to get your message. I was going to review "Pawnee Zoo", but I was like 'Maybe he's getting sick tired of seeing me', so. Like I said, I'm glad to get your message. Likewise, good luck to you too in the WikiCup. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  16:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I do. Though, I hope for the good of it. You're welcome, I'm glad you had me in mind to review the article. Good for you, I was like 'I wonder when he's going for the GT.' I wish you all the best with it. :) If you have questions, which I highly doubt, let me know. Yeah, I'll submit some articles to GAN, and review as well. Thanks, I'll take that in consideration. ;) I know you'll do honest reviews, I've seem some of your reviews, and they seem fair and balanced to me. Would it be alright if I come to you for help? Like overlooking an article, mainly episode ones, and telling me your feedback? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I guess you're right. At least I'm in the top 3. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  19:43, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

White Zombie
Hey, Thanks for being so patient with the article. It's been a rough holiday. Let me just have one more week to bring everything up to code. If you don't hear back from me, or anything. Feel free to fail it. I think things have settled enough for me to give it the through and clean sweep it needs to make it pass now. Again, thanks with your patience! Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay! I think the White Zombie article has all problems addressed now. Can you take a look at it? Sorry for the delays. I'm not the most quick wikipedian. :)Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Roadmap?
I am interested in clear guidelines. Now they are clearer (after re-writing) but not specific enough. By the guidelines, the two articles (2009 trips) are a keep. Obama is more of a celebrity than Rudd. However, by historical measures, neither is a keep. Historical guidelines shape one's thinking but is not a Wikipedia criteria. I think I might contact the leading author of the guidelines (The Wordsmith) and seek to improve the guidelines. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 17:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Consider changing your signature so there's a link to your user talk page. Now, there's a link to your user page. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 17:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Trapper Keeper (South Park)
Hey Hunter. If you're not too busy, do you think you could look for some more production for the Trapper Keeper (South Park) article? I think it's pretty close to GA status. Thanks,  The left orium  11:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I was thinking maybe you had access to the DVD commentaries? Or is the 4 minute video on YouTube the whole thing?  The left orium  15:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 2010 in organised crime
Hello! Your submission of 2010 in organized crime at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! JulieSpaulding (talk) 12:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

The above is more pressing so attend to that DYK first! :) About your message to me, maybe you should clarify the speedy to calm some nerves? Anyone reading too fast might think that you mean speedy delete when you actually mean either speedy keep or speedy close but keep.  I'm about to discuss with one of the lead authors about clarifying the notability guideline to have less confusion. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 15:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

The Office
I figured :) I saw your article contribs and wished that could have been me! JulieSpaulding (talk) 15:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks! Lets be honest though, your P&R articles are a step above, really, with proper production sections and all. A while ago I discussed trying to work up another season of 30 Rock to Good or Featured Topic status, we'd be emulating you! :) Staxringold talkcontribs 05:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Dances with Smurfs
I've conducted a review on that article, so come check it out. Cheers,  The Flash  {talk} 00:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * lol, Thanks. All look's pretty good; I'm doing the final say now :)  The Flash  {talk} 01:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Gossip (The Office)
Hey. Just letting you know I nommed this at GAN. If it's an issue, given that we're both in the cup (though the points would of course go to you, not me) then I can withdraw it and you can re-nom (or not) if you wish. Just giving you a heads up, as I found the article to be a pretty good read. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright. For now I'll leave it, since I probably won't have time to get to reviewing it; my schedule's filling up and I have a lot tagged I need to review yet. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 04:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 08:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror
Hey, Hunter. I was wondering if you could do me a favor and review that article at GAN? It was just reviewed today I believe, but while the reviewer put it on hold, he immediately failed it as he believed the prose to be simply to appalling. Still, however, I've renominated it and would like to get a different opinion. Thanks,  The Flash  {talk} 00:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I believe that'd be a very reasonable thing to do. The reviewer noted that I should get the article copyedit, so I suppose I'll perform one by myself before asking someone I know if they can perform it again. However, though, I'm unsure about listing it at GAR, as the page states that "If you can fix the concerns, find them unreasonable, or the review inadequate, it is usually best to renominate the article at Wikipedia:Good article nominations, rather than requesting a community reassessment." Still, though, what do you think? And in the meanwhile, I've remove it from GAn for now.  The Flash  {talk} 02:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * So, wait, are you saying that after I get it copyedited, I should contact the reviewer, or...?  The Flash  {talk} 02:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see now. No, no, that sounds like a splendid idea. I've performed a copyedit on the article already; if you'd like, I can request this one user I know who is apart of the CEG to see if he can perform another one.  The Flash  <sup style="color:black;">{talk} 04:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Carlos Beltrán Leyva
Hello! Your submission of Carlos Beltrán Leyva at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Harrias (talk) 13:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Hey Hunter, what's up? Listen, if your offer still stands, do you think you can look over an episode article in my sandbox? I'm only asking if you got the time to do it. If you don't, it's understandable. If you do, that'd we awesome, and you'd be a lifesaver. ;) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:35, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't mind your CE, the useful it is, the more it'll be good. I removed the last sentence from the lead, per your suggestion. I just added it cause I thought it'd be useful, but at the same time I don't want to give too much in the lead. I don't know, but the thing she says she did to Sean Hayes was the one they used in the episode; she ended up slapping him. Here's the script to prove it. Hope that is not killing you no more. Thanks, I appreciate that comment. ;) --  ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:21, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject reports
A WikiProject reports is basically a story about what's been going on lately with a particular WikiProject: what interesting efforts are underway, what strategies they are using to organize editor effort, what milestones or goals they work towards, what the content in their area is like quality-wise, etc. Another variation that past Signpost writers have done is to interview the leaders of a WikiProject. You can see examples of what people have done with the WikiProject report in the past here; it's very flexible and can basically be anything you think people would want to read within the general scope of WikiProjects.--ragesoss (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * In the past, WikiProject reports haven't really been topical like that; a typical report has more been basically an overview/introduction to a significant WikiProject. But actually, I would be more interested in reading the kinds of things you describe, and I think many other readers would be too.--ragesoss (talk) 01:07, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Great! Just add yourself for the WikiProject report here, either as a main writer or backup depending on whether you think you want to contributed weekly or close to, or just occasionally.  Then when you have a draft ready, you can either put up a note and link about it in the "Notices" section at the top of the newsroom, or add it to the "for publication" section at the appropriate title for the coming week if you're confident it will be polished up in time for the next issue.--ragesoss (talk) 02:51, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Carlos Beltrán Leyva
I have nominated Carlos Beltrán Leyva, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Carlos Beltrán Leyva. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 00:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Tom's Rhinoplasty
Hi, Hunter. Just alerting you that I've performed a GAR for the article, and while it is in great shape, I've spotted some issues that need fixing. Meanwhile, do you think I should get "Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror" professionally copyedited before you review it, or just nominate it now? Cheers,  The Flash  <sup style="color:black;">{talk} 01:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Great, I'll go over that then. And don't worry, it's nothing like that. I just happen to be reviewing your article—I'm quite interested in the quality of SP articles and enjoy reviewing them. I think I'll see if the copyeditor has the time, and if not I'll just nominate it.  The Flash  <sup style="color:black;">{talk} 03:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know, I've performed the final say on the article.  The Flash  <sup style="color:black;">{talk} 00:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

AFD
Thank you for your nice message.

Unfair treatment and article "racism" is bad. Article racisms has nothing to do with race except that people treat some article differently just like they treat Black people differently. For example, the Obama trip to China survived AFD at first. Only when confronted with "article racism" did the AFD turn to delete. I guess that the person deciding did not want to keep the Obama article and delete the Rudd article. In the end, I don't agree with the decision but it was not the worse decision possible.

What is the solution to reduce unfair treatment?

I think it is a revisiting of the othercrapexist idea. Not exactly sure how, though. JB50000 (talk) 05:44, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

tb2
The F Word (South Park) has been reviewed C T J F 8 3  chat 18:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Passed the GAC C T J F 8 3  chat 19:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 and Dermatology-related content
I noticed that you are participating in the 2010 WikiCup. I have been working on the Bolognia push which is a project to make sure Wikipedia has an article (or redirect) on every know cutaneous condition. With that being said, there are still many cutaneous condition stubs to be made, and Bolognia could be a source for a lot of DYK articles, etc. Therefore, I was thinking maybe we could help one another... a competative WikiCup that also serves to improve dermatologic content on Wikipedia. I could e-mail you the Bolognia login information if you have any interest? ---kilbad (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

The Set Up
Hello Hunter, regarding your nomination of The Set Up (Parks and Recreation) for Good Article status... I just wanted to know who would take the userbox (like the one you have on your user page) for the article. I understand that you've contributed far more than what I have, so I'm willing to cede this to you if you'd like. Thanks, JulieSpaulding (talk) 08:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Hunter :) I'll be watching the page in case something happens that requires our attention. I had no idea Amy Poehler was married to Will Arnett. JulieSpaulding (talk) 14:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Regarding the GA nominations, if it's not regarded as canvassing or anything, I'd be happy to give them a shot. I know you're up for the WikiCup so I can understand that you'd want them reviewed as fast as possible! I can start reviewing them tomorrow if you'd like. JulieSpaulding (talk) 15:08, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Death (South Park)
Perhaps I could do the Reception section work on the article Mecha Streisand? Cirt (talk) 22:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Pawnee Zoo
Hi Hunter, I've reviewed Pawnee Zoo and there are a couple of things that need to be addressed. They're only minor, so I would say that I could pass this article very soon. JulieSpaulding (talk) 10:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Pee is also on hold. JulieSpaulding (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Same with Dead Celebrities. JulieSpaulding (talk) 11:22, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, thank you :) I don't think I can do any more today though! JulieSpaulding (talk) 15:56, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Just in case you aren't watching the Dead Celebrities GA review page, there's one more thing that needs to be fixed. If you fix it in the next couple of minutes I can approve it before I log off! JulieSpaulding (talk) 16:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 14:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: WikiCup question
I think the bot's a bit dead. I'll speak to its owner. :) GARDEN  20:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

TB
We have conflicting talk page things, so never know where to respond to you at. :) C T J F 8 3  chat 02:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Parks and Rec
Yay that sounds great! No feel free to edit them. I am not the controlling type, those articles could use some more information. Any help you would like to offer is greatly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tikopowii (talk • contribs) 03:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Leslie's House
I wasn't going to nominate it for DYK myself (I don't really feel like I have contributed enough to it), but I've got no problems. How goes the WikiCup? JulieSpaulding (talk) 10:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Beck v. Eiland-Hall
Thanks again for doing the review. For the most part - I directly implemented all suggested changes as recommended in the GA Review. Please see Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall/GA1. Yours, Cirt (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Beck v. Eiland-Hall

Mecha-Streisand
No worries, keep on doin good stuff, I will add to the Reception info later... Cirt (talk) 04:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll defer to your judgment, if you are confident to nom it now, fine - cuz it might still sit in the queues and then I can work on it. Either way, Cirt (talk) 04:28, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

South Park awards
Is there a page on wiki like this, but for South Park? Cirt (talk) 04:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * List of awards and nominations received by The Simpsons

Re: Gypsies
Thanks for reviewing the article, I appreciate it. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  16:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

P&R at DYK
Hey. I noticed a nice group of Parks and Recreation characters at DYK. Given the backlog, would you be able to combine them all into one hook? I like most of the individual hooks but with 300+ hooks to go through over there, I'm trying to do what I can to lessen it. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 05:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 January newsletter
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to, our current leader, who, at the time of writing, has more listed points than and   (second and third place respectively) combined. A special well done also goes to - his artcle Jewel Box (St. Louis, Missouri) was the first content to score points in the competition.

Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 21:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Wong Fu Productions GAN
Thank you for reviewing the good article nomination of Wong Fu Productions. I have made responses to your comments on the article's talk page. Arsonal (talk) 05:26, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies; I tend to miss bullets when there is too much text... I have responded to that objection. >.> Arsonal (talk) 05:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Savanna Samson
Thanks for reviewing the article. It's very much appreciated. Epbr123 (talk) 11:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome
Thank you for your kind words regarding the plot summary of Sweetums. I enjoy the show and consider myself fairly observant with respect to the various narratives and conflicts, so I'm glad to be of service. Sincerely, Obamafan70 (talk) 03:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)