User talk:Ironholds/Archive 7

2008 submarine cable disruption
I provided a citation supporting the removed information on the talk page. Did you check the talk page before reversion?Wzrd1 (talk) 00:27, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * putting a citation on the talkpage is great. Putting a citation on the talkpage, without including it in the article, and reverting without mentioning that this source exists, is not. If you have a citation incorporate it into the article. Ironholds (talk) 01:44, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have now reviewed the citation. Where does it say anything about the Snowden-related allegations? Ironholds (talk) 01:45, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * As Snowden never made the allegations, but an industry group speculated on sabotage, I fail to see the point of adding a citation to a non-extant section. Unless I misread the excised part, which that time period was long pre-Snowden leaks. BTW, I was in Qatar during that period and had severe network issues on our base.Wzrd1 (talk) 01:48, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * what? You clearly seriously misread the diff. The diff involves the removal of an uncited section that claimed the NSA was cutting cables to make interception easier. The diff did absolutely nothing for the section about sailors cutting cables. This is not a "non-extant section" it's the highlighted paragraph in the revert. You've been undoing my edits because you have a citation that's nothing to do with what my edits were removing. Ironholds (talk) 01:52, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Crud, it looks like I swept yours up with another, or tried to. That's what I get for trying to edit while at work.Wzrd1 (talk) 01:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * "On Monday, 18 February, the International Telecommunication Union said that the damage could have been an act of sabotage. The UN agency's head of development, Sami al-Murshed was quoted, "We do not want to preempt the results of ongoing investigations, but we do not rule out that a deliberate act of sabotage caused the damage to the undersea cables over two weeks ago."" was what I was trying to kill, due to the later prosecution.Wzrd1 (talk) 01:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. Okay; I'm going to assume I'm safe to remove the uncited paragraph, then. Ironholds (talk) 01:58, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan!Wzrd1 (talk) 02:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Andrew has been offsite for a while.
I was wondering, is there an alternative source of his data? Obviously we'll lose the mobile data again but that's no worse than it was last year.  Serendi pod ous  12:33, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * West? Ironholds (talk) 18:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes. Couldn't do the Top 25/Traffic Report last week.--Milowent • hasspoken  13:44, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Theoretically the analytics team should providing this data; I'd suggest emailing kleduc@wikimedia.org asking when it can be expected :(. Ironholds (talk) 14:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Arbitration enforcement
You are receiving this message because you have commented about this matter on the AN page, the AE page or the Case Requests page and are therefore restricted as specified in (2). For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Change from announced time table for the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case
You are receiving this message either because you are a party to the Arbitration enforcement'' arbitration case, because you have commented in the case request, or the AN or AE discussions leading to this arbitration case, or because you have specifically opted in to receiving these messages. Unless you are a party to this arbitration case, you may opt out of receiving further messages at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Notification list. The drafters of the Arbitration enforcement'' arbitration case have published a revised timetable for the case, which changes what you may have been told when the case was opened. The dates have been revised as follows: the Evidence phase will close 5 July 2015, one week earlier than originally scheduled; the Workshop phase will close 26 July 2015, one week later than originally scheduled; the Proposed decision is scheduled to be posted 9 August 2015, two weeks later than originally scheduled. Thank you. On behalf of the arbitration clerks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Motion passed in AE arbitration case granting amnesty and rescinding previous temporary injunction
This message is sent at 12:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC) by Arbitration Clerk User:Penwhale via MassMessage on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. You are receiving this message because your name appears on this list and have not elected to opt-out of being notified of development in the arbitration case.

On 5 July, 2015, the following motion was passed and enacted:

The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways: Sign up now Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
 * Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
 * Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
 * Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
 * Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
 * Research coordinators: run reference services

Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Act 2010 needs a page
Hi Ironholds, the Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Act 2010 needs a page. Can you start one for me? Please and thank you.

66.185.212.143 (talk) 22:20, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

I need a big favor from you
Hi, Ironholds. I'm sure you know me from around Wikipedia and IRC - It's great to talk to you and run into you on a daily basis. The reason I'm messaging you is because I've been somewhat considering the RfA process recently, and I saw that you are listed in RRN. I'm honestly not looking for a nomination at this time; I'm just looking for someone to review my contributions and give me honest feedback regarding my candidacy if I were to (hypothetically) run for adminship today. I was wondering (and would be very, very grateful) if you could evaluate my contributions and logs, and give me honest and down-to-earth feedback regarding my (possible) candidacy and if I would make a good administrator. I'd want to know ... How would you vote? What bothers you? What am I doing wrong? What am I not doing that I should be doing? You will not hurt my feelings - I don't want you to hold anything back. Would you be willing to do this for me? I give you my most sincere appreciation in advance. Cheers, and happy editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:51, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd normally be happy to take a look but I'm actually going out on holiday to Vermont tomorrow, and don't know how much time I'll have :(. What's the urgency? If the answer is "not much" I'd recommend pinging me next Monday-Tuesday, when I'm back :). Ironholds (talk) 01:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Ha. Absolutely no urgency at all. Have a good holiday.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:04, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Robert Leith-Macgregor
I am trying to find out some info for an old guy I know about an Admiral MacGregor (British Navy 1940s). Your page mentions that the above was the step-son of an admiral. Do you remember where that info came from and how I could research further?

Thanking you for your help

Stoorybrig (talk) 15:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * it came from a news article in The Times which is unfortunately now paywalled (I can grab a link if you'd like). Your best resource is likely to be the London Gazette: all commissions are gazetted, so appear there. I can't imagine there were many Admiral MacGregors in the 1940s, so you may be able to narrow it down by looking for the date of his promotion and getting a full name out of that. Hope that helps! Ironholds (talk) 16:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Stoorybrig (talk) 19:30, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Women
Hi, I see you recently joined WikiProject Women in Red. I've made a proposal to merge this project into WikiProject Women at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red, so we can not only cover missing articles but focus on general quality of women's biographies. If interested please put your name down on the WP:Women page at the bottom.♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Gray's Inn
Hi Ironholds, I just came across which you originally uploaded. I believe the description "A map of Gray's Inn in 1677" would be more accurate, as the map itself gives every indication of being much more recent. Would you please consider clearing up the metadata for attribution, date, etc on Commons? Cheers, LeadSongDog come howl!  21:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * got a link? Ironholds (talk) 00:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, File:1677_Gray%27s_Inn.jpg LeadSongDog come howl!  03:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Fixed; thanks! Ironholds (talk) 12:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you! LeadSongDog come howl!  01:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Contribution Team?
Contribution Team? --Shirt58 (talk) 14:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * what about it? Ironholds (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Marie Poussepin
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

good article about Marie Poussepin even better
i hope you dont' mind me correcting terms in the article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Poussepin

- order, church and congregation put in their respective better positions; in the article they were used rather freely as if interchangeable. :) (to found new order is difficult, and not done anymore; newer similar institutions are called congregations. and our friend marie did not attempt to found new order, just sisterhood under wing of Dominican order.)

but i don't know how to correct DYK on wiki main page. that's the problem.

(am bit of new editor meself...confused.) BirgittaMTh (talk) 08:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Rafael Núñez (hacker) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafael Núñez (hacker) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rafael Núñez (hacker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Oscar (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list
Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and  MusikAnimal  talk  18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Five minutes to help make WikiProjects better
Hello!

First, on behalf of WikiProject X, thank you for trying out the WikiProject X pilot projects. I would like to get some anonymous feedback from you on your experience using the new WikiProject layout and tools. This way, we will know what we did right, and if we did something horribly wrong, we can try to fix it. This feedback won't be associated with your username, so please be completely honest. We are determined to improve the experience of Wikipedians, and your feedback helps us with that. (You are also welcome to leave non-anonymous feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject X.)

Please complete the survey here. The survey has two parts: the first part asks for your username, while the second part contains the survey questions. These two parts are stored separately, so your username will not be associated with your feedback. There are only nine questions and it should not take very long to complete. Once you complete the survey I will leave a handwritten note on your talk page as a token of my appreciation.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Harej (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello! Just sending a reminder to complete the survey linked above. (This is the only reminder I'll send, I promise.) Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions. Thank you!!! Harej (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Football
Can you help by improving / creating seasons in Cupa României or Liga II, if everyone will create at least 1 season, every edition will be done soon. Thank you.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 15:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think I've ever created football-related pages and don't have an interest in them, I'm afraid. Ironholds (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Hey
Are you actively editing these days? You've been awfully quiet of late. Just thought I would stop by and check up on you. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Honestly, not really. The longer I go on the more toxic I find the community as a whole - and I don't particularly enjoy contributing in the absence of a community. This toxicity isn't new - it's always been there, and heck, I've contributed to it in the past - but what is relatively new is how we indulge it. How arbitrarily prohibitons on it are enforced, and how easily contributions become a shield to justice. The person who fed into that is not who I am now, but contributing makes it very easy to be that person. So I've been trying to stay away from everything, because it makes me rest easier and it avoids creating a situation where I feel drawn to that kind of drama. I have the R community, the research community, and a few others for the productive conversing, and Wikipedia doesn't seem to have got much worse or better without me, so... ;p. Ironholds (talk) 00:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Chief, you contributed a large volume of high-quality content to the encyclopedia, you were a good admin, but you got your butt caught in a crack. No doubt that hurt (a lot), and the fact that some folks can't let go and can't forgive is on them.  I will always remember your kindness to me when I was a newbie, and try to pay it forward whenever I see a good-faith rookie caught in an ANI Kafkaesque nightmare that they don't quite understand.  There's a lot of that.  The longer I've been here what surprises me the most is the well-established factions that impact what we do here . . . whether it's ANI, RfA, etc.  I try to avoid the drama boards and the politics as much as I can, and I think I'm saner for it, but every once in a while an obvious screw-job draws me in to defend the little guy.  For what it's worth, there's at least one editor around here who misses your regular contributions.  Focusing on writing is a lot more fun, too, and nothing stops you from doing that.  Cheers, old man.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 01:27, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks; that paying it forward is..precisely what I'd like to see everyone do when it comes to kindness :). I won't lie, the inability to let stuff go gets me, but actually that getting-myself-caught-in-a-crack made me learn a hell of a lot about my behaviour and the wider world that was, in the grand scheme of things, very helpful - and it's that learning that has made me more observant of myself and others and less willing to deal with toxicity. Ironholds (talk) 15:22, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

This place looks completely different.
I feel like Sookie walking into Bill's house at the start of True Blood (season 4). She spent a hot minute in faerie world and came home to find she'd actually been gone for more than a year. When she left, Bill's house was a dilapidated shithole. When she got back, pimped out mansion. I wouldn't say Wikipedia is so much pimped out, but the editor is so much sweeter. Almost makes me want to return to editing. Almost. Indubitably (Lara)  00:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * You like the VE? Awesome! Ironholds (talk) 17:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't know what VE means, but yes. Apparently. Indubitably  (Lara)  17:57, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

MOS:IDENTITY is being revisited: How should Wikipedia refer to transgender individuals before and after their transition?
You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.

Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 01:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Comment on your comment on Signpost
You said: Literally speaking, it can't possibly be counter-productive; we already lost. If we appeal, the worst we can get is the status quo. Just so you know, what can happen is that at the appellate level, Wikipedia can lose again, this time setting bad precedent for future cases. A dismissal at the US District Court level cannot be cited by other courts in other cases as establishing the reason for a dismissal in those cases; a dismissal in the US Court of Appeals (for any circuit) may set precedent that can then be cited by other courts to support a dismissal in other cases. That said, the foundation should appeal if legal counsel sees solid grounds for doing so. (Note: on semi-wikibreak, so ping if you reply here) Etamni &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 04:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * that's a very good point, and something I hadn't considered. I have a lot of trust in the lawyers here; in my alternate persona I helped prepare the data underlying a lot of the complaint and so interacted with them a lot, and they're smart people. If they say we have a chance, we have a chance. Ironholds (talk) 16:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Andrew Sledd FAC
FYI, the Andrew Sledd article, for which you performed the Good Article review, has been nominated as a Feature Article candidate. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, Ollie!
And may all your days be [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvfhoWIPoVw merry and bright. . .] Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:07, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Same to you! Ironholds (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Introduction to X pages
Hi, I've done some work updating the Introduction to xxx pages (using a standardised template ). In particular, I've started making a few versions for VisualEditor. If you're interested in continuing some of the work you were doing in 2012, any help you provide would be gladly welcomed! I'm hoping to make the tutorial series a bit more prominent (maybe someday even replace the somewhat horrible default WP:Tutorial page). T.Shafee(Evo&#65120;Evo)talk 09:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Cool; I'm not really involved in those projects any more but we'll see - thanks! It looks like great work :). Ironholds (talk) 16:25, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

#wetelltheirstory
After a conversation with another Hamilton fan about "vandalism" of Hamilton-related people, I put together a sketch of a page here that I can point good-faith-ish new editors at. Your thoughts/laughter/etc. super-welcome, obviously. —Luis (talk) 02:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to an online editathon on Black Women's History
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Women in Red events by removing your name from this list.) --Ipigott (talk) 12:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination
Hey,

I saw that you would be willing to nominate users to become an administrator. I'm fairly new to wikipedia, but have really been enjoying working on counter-vandalism. If you could nominate me, I'd really appreciate it.

Schuddeboomw (talk) 16:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * hey Schuddeboomw. Thanks for pinging me! It's great to see someone enthusiastic about doing more to help the wiki, and I have no doubt that with time you'll be a great person to work as an admin. But as you note, you're pretty new (to the order of a week, by your account contributions) and while your work has been great thus far, voters tend to want to see at least 6 months of experience editing in various areas. Please do let me know if you'd like some pointers, however! Ironholds (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your response, I really appreciate it. I'll try to get some more experience and try again in a few years :). Schuddeboomw (talk) 17:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

MfD busywork
Hello Ironholds.

Do you remember your early days, 2008, when you had a penchant for listing dubious userpsace pages at MfD? It was very frustrating to me, trying to review MfD nominations, to have MfD flooded with what seemed like endless worthless but not particularly problematic pages. Well, you've been away form there for a long time, but the place hasn't changed, just the people who engage in the practice of filling it with busywork. At least, that's how it feels to me. I recall getting the impression back then that my comments to your nominations irritated you.

Why did you you stop? Or if you prefer, do you still consider your old MfD nominations worthwhile?

Interestingly, the new editors who do this sort of stuff at MfD often go on to become very valuable Wikipedians Yourself, for example. I've wondered, it this behaviour, which I characterize as "feeding busywork into the MfD process", an attempt by new Wikipedians to gain experience in a variety of Wikipedia processes. Perhaps they linger at MfD because it is a particularly odd place?

I've spent a scary amount of time volunteering at MfD. I wonder if you could give me a few minutes of your time, on your thoughts of that place in hindsight.

--SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey SmokeyJoe. For me, I suspect I did it because it was relatively clean-cut work. Other venues for that kind of labour - patrolling the articlespace, for example - can be very tense because the costs of getting it wrong are much higher; a misplaced CSD can drive a user off, end up with someone shouting at you, and smudge your record. MfD work over pages by long-since-departed users, or clearly ad-based userpages, have lower costs associated. But I can only speak for me. Ironholds (talk) 16:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi!
Would you please be so kind to ping me or something when you post the list of missing names from the book? Thanks in advance! The Quixotic Potato (talk) 15:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Absolutely! Ironholds (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I saw some interesting statistics. BTW, I made this edit. The sentence: "There, Burr had trouble in, becoming a rebellious and disruptive child; as well as brief attempts to leave he, aged ten, signed on as a cabin boy and was only tracked down and returned home with some difficulty." needs a little tweaking. Did he have trouble fitting in? The Quixotic Potato (talk) 04:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! And he did, I was just editing while distracted :). Ironholds (talk)
 * I was reading your blog and your post about stupid commenters reminded me of Misery. Someone should create something similar, but for Ghost. I would've left a comment, but anon comments aren't allowed. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 04:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reviewing Mary Logan Reddick - and thanks for the Barnstar! (And I've contacted Harvard for permission for her photo - they have an awesome one!) I just wish I'd been able to find out more about her. Hildabast (talk) 23:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * no problem! It's a great article :). Best of luck getting the image - Harvard can be a wee bit ornery but I am hopeful :). Ironholds (talk) 23:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Theodosia Bartow Prevost at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Theodosia Bartow Prevost
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

There is a mop reserved in your name
--John Cline (talk) 04:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC) Hello Ironholds. I don't know how much thought you may have given to re-acquiring the admin bit, but I wanted you to know that I have given it thought, and I bet others have too. In my meditation, I have concluded that you'd be an asset to the corps, and several fold better than the admin editor we previously perceived you to be. Whether you ever regain sysop or not, I feel I've witnessed a remarkable transformation in your every manner and I'd be happy to support your candidacy if it were to transpire. What's more, I'd be happy to drink a beer with you; a thing I once thought never could be. Bravo sir, you done good!--John Cline (talk) 04:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks John. To be honest I haven't thought about it that much; my attention is fragmented enough right now between Wikipedia, code and science that I'm not sure I have the time and energy to re-engage with the project to the degree expected of RfA candidates. Plus, I'm still recovering from getting out of the Foundation! This may change in the future (I hope it will) but for the time being Wikipedia isn't my priority, and to at least some degree sysops should be able to make it theirs. I very much appreciate the thought, mind :). Ironholds (talk) 13:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to our April event
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Sent by Rosiestep (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC) via WP:MassMessage

fyi
good read Nocturnalnow (talk) 04:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Shhh! Invitation to Women in Espionage
--Rosiestep (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Photography
--Rosiestep (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Women artists of Middle East / North Africa... a WiR & Guggenheim collaboration
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Not sure if this is your deal, but...
One of our students created an article on The Oven of Akhnai. It's not great, but overhauling it so it will be is a bit beyond my capabilities right now. However, it appears to be up your alley. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Spotlight on women entertainers!
--Rosiestep (talk) 02:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Welcome to the Hall of Fame!
--Rosiestep (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

TFL notification
Hi, Ironholds. I'm just posting to let you know that Hughes Medal – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for August 12. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:39, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) via MassMessage 04:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Indigenous women & Polar women editathons
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

Question about message
You posted this to me a few years back. I never checked messages until now. :)

"If you can add a reference for your claim about PRR's Live at NEARfest album i'll include the information; until then it stays out. Ironholds (talk) 07:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)"

I'm not sure what you are referring to, but I am the one that released this album (I owned NEARfest Records), so I'm the source.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chutch15 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Upcoming editathons: Women in Nursing & Women Labor Activists
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

question
How are you? Thank you for reviewing "Persecuta" I have a question. User:KGirlTrucker81 reviewd another of my contributions and IMHO quite arbitrarily marked for speedy deletetion. I conteted the thing and we'll see. BUT I think that this user is abusing power. Is there a way of controlling this kind of things (arbitrary deletation - sabotage)? Is there a users ranking or similar "medical history" of users? Eralos (talk) 01:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Poking my head in...
Greetings old friend - glad to see you're still around. I've popped back in to try and re-write/expand an old Labour politicians article (Arthur Greenwood, but realised everything's changed! I had to concentrate to remember how to sign something! Skinny87 (talk) 19:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to 	 Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

An invitation to November's events
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December 2016 at Women in Red
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2017 at Women in Red
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February 2017 at Women in Red
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Care to do any "mopping"?
Hi, Daniel. I saw that you were awarded (?) a "mop". And was wondering if you might be willing to apply it at Talk:Earthquake prediction, where we have a big sopping mess of an RfC that needs to be closed. I don't know that it warrants a close read, but I am concerned that a less experienced editor might step into it, and try to issue profound fiats without doing a careful read. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Addition of un-redirected pages to Special:NewPages and Special:NewPagesFeed
I'm contacting you because you participated in this proposal discussion. While the proposal was approved, it has not received developer action. The request is now under consideration as part of the 2017 Developer Wishlist, with voting open through the end of day on Tuesday (23:59 UTC). The latter link describes the voting process, if you are interested. — swpb T 18:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Ironholds. I'm just posting to let you know that Davy Medal – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 26. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 00:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

September 2017 at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October editathon invitation
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Ping
Hey, are you okay? WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
 Merry Christmas !!

Hi, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia! ,

– Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Greetings and Salutations



 * To Ironholds:


 * Hello!


 * Congratulations!


 * You have been included in my first, and possibly only, Very Early Christmas List!


 * As an earnest fellow believer in Santa Claus, and possibly in Our Redeemer Liveth as well, you may wonder how you got on this list.


 * I have no idea!


 * That's my story and I'm sticking to it.


 * Unless I tracked down the connection in our user talk archives, in which case you know who you are!


 * Or not.


 * All the best for you and yours this Christmas 2018 and New Year 2019!


 * – Athaenara jingles all the way 02:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

... and again today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:29, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Shell Professor of Chemical Engineering for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shell Professor of Chemical Engineering is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shell Professor of Chemical Engineering until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theprussian (talk) 14:09, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Lucas Dillon, 6th Viscount Dillon
Dear Ironholds. The article Lucas Dillon, 6th Viscount Dillon, was created by User:Aatomic1 on 15 April 2007. In 2009 user User:Tryde (now retired) blanked it and changed it into a redirect page pointing to the article Viscount Dillon, which lists such viscounts. User:Rms125a@hotmail.com reversed this change and called it "vandalism". You intervened and upheld Tryde's blank-and-redirect. One of the results was a circular redirect on the article Viscount Dillon where the list entry for the 6th Viscount pointed to the mentioned redirect page. I tried to mend this vicious circle be recreating the article for Lucas Dillon, 6th Viscount Dillon, from the redirect page. Perhaps I should not have done so: it went against your administrative decision. I am a novice in Wikipedia and had not read WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT. I did not find a reason for the blank-and-redirect, nor did I see a discussion of it (I do not think there was one). Likely, the subject does not pass the test of notability. The article, as it is now, is still too short: only 314 words of readable prose, which is a size for a stub, not a start. Eventually you might consider my effort misdirected and propose the article for deletion or simply revert my edit. The circular redirect might indicate that a redirect is not the right solution for the problem. With many thanks for your time, respectfully yours Johannes Schade (talk) 18:25, 19 January 2020 (UTC)