User talk:Johnleemk/Archive9

'Welcome to my talk page''; feel free to leave any enquiries/comments/brickbats you feel like leaving here. If it necessitates a response, one will be made on your talk page instead of here. I do not usually watch Talk pages I write comments on, so I typically expect a response on this page. Thanks for co-operating.'''

You can add a new comment to this page here.

Archives:
 * User talk:Johnleemk/Archive1
 * User talk:Johnleemk/Archive2
 * User talk:Johnleemk/Archive3
 * User talk:Johnleemk/Archive4
 * User talk:Johnleemk/Archive5
 * User talk:Johnleemk/Archive6
 * User talk:Johnleemk/Archive7
 * User talk:Johnleemk/Archive8

John Ling
I propose that you go ahead and get the John Ling article removed completely. It is clear that he and his supporters have been quite a nuisance. I can't believe you've allowed this prick to run around for so long with no consequences. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 222.152.218.193 (talk • contribs).

Requests for arbitration/Moby Dick
Cool Cat made a statement on this request for arbitration and I commented on it, mentioning that I wanted to add evidence regarding Cool Cat's continued POV editing, and other violations in articles regarding Kurds, the Armenian Genocide and other related issues. Before I spend time on collecting and preparing the evidence, I would like to know if the ArbCom will actually consider any evidence against Cool Cat during this ArbCom case? I am not sure what the rules are regarding this, and before I make a lot of efforts collecting evidence, I would like to know what the rules are and what the position of the ArbCom is regarding this? Cool Cat is not mentioned as a "involved party" but he did make a statement regarding this case. -- Karl Meier 17:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The case has from the very beginning been very much about a conflict between Moby and Cool Cat, and just adding evidence can hardly be considered harassment... But anyway, I shouldn't waste your time with such details. Thanks for taking the time to make a good and useful reply. I appriciate it. -- Karl Meier 18:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Changes in policy suggested
After my experience with the case of Dabljuh, where you made a comment I found helpful, I suggested some changes to the policies and asked to enforce those we already have:  Socafan 18:42, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject User Page Help
Hi Johnleemk. I was wondering if you could relook your oppostion on the above MFD. Sam Blanning suggested that you relook it. Reason being Sam changed his vote and you stated "conditional delete per Sam Blanning". Thank you! — The King   of Kings  04:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Bazzajf and the arb case...
I noticed you placed a note about IrishPunkTom's arb case on 's talk page. Currently Bazzajf is serving under a week block for personal attacks on another editor. However, if you think it is important enough that he contribute (he has maybe 5 days left on the block) feel free to unblock him or tell me here and I'll unblock him. Thanks! Syrthiss 12:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok, I'll perhaps make a note of that on his talk page re submitting info by email (if your template message doesn't say that explicitly). Thanks! Syrthiss 14:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Trivia
"For the umpteenth time, NO TRIVIA". I have a problem with this statement. It sounds a bit like a frustrated parent. I always thought that Wiki was based on co-operation. Am I wrong on this?

andreasegde 15:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I honestly feel that there is something amiss here...
 * "blatantly ignore a growing consensus among more experienced editors"
 * This sounds like a growing upper-class of editors that are controlling things. Does this mean that there is a hierarchy in Wikipedia? Uhhh... I hope not...
 * We all try to (hopefully) quote from reliable sources, or to tell the truth, which can be proven. No experience needed.
 * "trivia sections are a sign of poor writing ". If it is written well - albeit about trivial subjects - how can it be badly written?
 * Last question: (Please read my page to see how I feel about co-operation) but why does trivia seem to bother the "more experienced editors" so much, and make them so "frustrated"? It´s trivia, and it is trivial, after all.
 * How many times have you read the liner notes of an album/CD to see who thanked who, and who made the tea? I do it all the time (Laugh...)
 * Have fun. andreasegde 16:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

"especially if they agree very strongly about it". Who are they? This suggests a collective, does it not? Do you include yourself in this collection? (I´m not being angry, by the way, so you can smile if you want...)

Wikipedia doesn´t (mostly) use real names, so how do we know who "they" are? Am I missing something here? Have you ever read, "The Lord of the Flies"? Innocence can be perverted (please don´t misconstrue this)...

Have you ever read/heard the phrase, "We are all equal, but some are more equal than others"?

Have fun. andreasegde 16:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

If "lists are bad", then does that mean the deletion of album/CD lists? Presidential lists? Who came second in a race? Those are also lists, are they not?

I am the fifth child of six children, so does that mean I must delete myself because I am not the eldest child (who will inherit the estate), but am the fifth in the list? Am I trivial? (I´m laughing... :)) Have fun. andreasegde 17:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

I´m sorry to have to write this, but I am shocked by your comments. Phrases such as, "We use", "the possibility exists for them to become an integral part", and "where I tend to stir up trouble for fun", are very troubling to me. Sorry, but they are.

The only reason I started writing for Wikipedia was because of its openess, and seemingly good sense of fair play. I now have the distinct feeling that "we" seems to be some kind of hidden club that decides on most things. It´s - scarily - a little like the idea of the "Thought Police". The "concensus" seems to be what "we" think, whoever "we" are. Can we join the concensus? To whom do we apply?

My original perception of Wikipedia as a wonderful way of people working together has now been thoroughly shaken, and stirred. If anything one contributes (factual or proven) is subjected to a higher echelon of one-sided "we don´t think so" criticism, or just outright ignored, then one question comes to mind, which is; why bother in the first place? Why not just write everything yourselves? Maybe that would preferable, laugh... :)

Have fun. andreasegde 22:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

What do you think about Crestville´s comment that he and three other editors, who have all been working on WP for a long time, disagree with you about your Trivia opinion? Count me in, by they way, but I´m just a beginner... If Trivia is not allowed on The Beatles page, then why have I seen Trivia sections on other pages, with no warning that it is not allowed? Hmmm...

If there is a concensus, then where is it? Who is it? How can we know what the concensus thinks when we´re not told what it thinks, except by your good self, of course :)

I intend to put a header on The Beatles dicussion page asking for anyone who contributes to decide if there should be a Trivia section. If enough people sign, would that be worthy of being the concensus? Probably not...

This is the problem with WP; a lot of people waste an awful lot of time discussing one little section; as we are doing. Is it really that important?

I suggest putting "NO TRIVIA" on the Wikipedia main page. Is that possible? It would save us both of lot of time (laugh...)

andreasegde 11:34, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh, by the way, this is on your front page: "If your appetite is not sated, you may also enjoy the Heavengames forums or Malaysia Today, where I tend to stir up trouble for fun."

andreasegde 11:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

I have just spotted this on the Marilyn Monroe page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marilyn_Monroe#Trivia

Why was that not deleted if it failed to comply with the concensus? Nobody complained about it on the discussion page. Good grief... I´m going grey...

andreasegde 18:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Check out The Beatles trivia; you might be surprised. andreasegde 10:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Afd for Ben_Burch
Even though you've already closed the AfD for Ben_Burch, I added info to the AfD page to indicate questions about a couple of the editors voting in support of keeping the article. In short, it appears there was sockpuppetry involved in the voting. Even though I don't normally edit an AfD after it is closed I believe the record needed to indicate that several of the editors were likely sockpuppets. Best, --Alabamaboy 16:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow! Didn't know that would kick off such a stink (see this link). Anyway, I've instead added the notices to the talk pages of The White Rose Society (website) and Ben Burch. I do find it interesting that so many sockpuppets and mass swarms of anonymous editors are involved in anything to do with these articles. --Alabamaboy 19:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

RuneScape holiday items
Although I'm an admin, I don't tend to deal with AFDs much, but considering Articles for deletion/Runescape Holiday Items, isn't RuneScape holiday items simply a recreation? It looks mightly odd, especially given that the first version is quite long and created less than two weeks after deletion. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:55, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Sahaba's ancestors on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Sahaba's ancestors. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. --Deathphoenix ʕ 20:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 3, July 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

King James Version of the Bible
Back in '04 you nominated this for FA. It's presently in the FARC section of WP:FAR. I'm doing my best to contact nominators, just to cover all our bases. You noted at the time "I've contributed only a couple of paragraphs worth of prose to it", so perhaps you can't fix it--now you know anyhow. Cheers, Marskell 17:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Kat Shoob on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kat Shoob. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. --Deathphoenix ʕ 16:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Deletion review for Template:Good article
hi, sorry to throw another DRV at you, but i hope you can take part in the deletion review debate for the above metadata template that puts a star on the article's mainpage (you voted in the original deletion debate). the vote is here Deletion review/Log/2006 July 8 (scroll down for Template:Good Article section). thanks. Zzzzz 00:38, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Containerization: source of "26% of all containers originate from China"?
Hi John,

could you please point me ( ApfelmitBiss%at%macnews.de ) to the source of the 26% indication? I checked the article you referenced, but can't find that specific figure.

Thank you, Chris

Where have you gone?
John, have you "disappeared" without telling us? If not, please come back ASAP - you were one of two regularly-active Arbitration clerks, aside from Tony Sidaway. I don't want Tony to become over-burdened by your absence. 23:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Since you're an anon, I'll reply here. I am currently on an extended Wikibreak because I think Wikipedia has become a fucked up place to work in, and I have no desire to voluntarily contribute to a project which depresses me. (And I'm not referring to the internal politics, which are fairly easy to ignore if you want to.) I plan on returning to editing within a week or two...maybe more. As for clerking, we'll see. But right now, (un)fortunately, I am away. Johnleemk | Talk 16:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

The Rabbit Joint on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of The Rabbit Joint. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review.

I saw your stress meter, and it's not green. So I don't think this issue really requires your attention. I'm just following what the guidelines told me to do. But, just in case you're interested.... Xaxafrad 08:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Jim the slave
In case you hadn't noticed, Jim the slave has been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

i want to register in that university
am writing to you from Iran. Our country is located in Asia. I have a strong intention to enter to the University of Malaya and to become a student of it. and I have a lot of questions. I hope you will help me: - how can I pass exams in distance? - what documents are required to be including to students? - what advantages University of Malaya can give to foreign students. - I need the name of public university (Aeronatiecal, Mechanical,

Mecchatronics)Engineering. Here below I set my contact info in the great hope you will use it to info me.

E-mail: pejmanmahmoody@yahoo.com

Looking forward to hear from you soon,

Sincerely Sevara.

P.S. If you need additional personal info pls contact me without any doubts.

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 4, August 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Pudgenet RfArb
Is there any particular reason why the Pudgenet case is in the "motion to close" section rather than the "recently closed" section. I ask because it's recieved four net close votes, I'm compiling the arbitration report, and I want to know in which section to put it. Thanks, David Mestel(Talk) 06:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * So what should I list it as? --David Mestel(Talk) 07:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi Johnleemk
I'm happy to see you back and editing. Best wishes, Tom Harrison Talk 17:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, really. I don't specialize in the same area as you, but I usually run into you a couple times. --  tariq abjotu  (joturner) 19:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * same. Syrthiss 19:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Images at Ketuanan Melayu
I'm not 100% sure what I'm being asked about, but I took a look at Image:Hisham Keris.jpeg. "I believe this qualifies as a fair use photograph where the issue of "Malay rights" is dealt with." isn't really the "detailed" fair use rationale that we're looking for, but, then again, a lot of that is already contained in HistoricPhoto. I see that it is being used in Portal space, which we're technically not supposed to do (although this "policy" is rarely enforced there). The most significant problem is that we don't seem to know who the copyright holder is. In terms of its use in Ketuanan Melayu, there could be a stronger argument that this image is necessary to understand the concept. If I were to take a guess as to why someone questioned its meeting Fair use it would be that they were concerned about the lack of copyright holder information or that it wasn't absolutely obvious that it is a historically significant image.

Much the same could be said for Image:Protest against Malayan Union.jpg and Image:Gerakan celebrate after 1969 election.jpg. Image:Bumi discount mod.jpg is different; our use of this is very transformative, which is good from the legal standpont, but it isn't crystal-clear that the same information couldn't be conveyed by text, and the image seems to be larger than we need it to be, while at the same time being low-resolution enough that it is hard to make out the important details. Anyway, I'd focus on getting the copyright holder information sorted out, and then making it more clear that these photographs are in and of themselves significant. I'll note that we regularly let much more dubious Fair use claims through WP:FAC. Jkelly 22:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

If you don't want to break out subarticles, then please just leave it intact; it would be better to have an overly long article than one that's lacking info. Everyking 03:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

re: Featured article candidates/Ketuanan Melayu
Hey John, sorry for the late response. I'm kinda busy with my new job. Anyway, I'll try to go through it slowly soon. Nice work though. __earth (Talk) 12:38, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Unfinished work FAC
Thanks for your constructive comments at the Unfinished work FAC. I have attended to the article and hope that you like what has been done. Cheers, violet/riga (t) 12:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking it over again so quickly - it is appreciated. violet/riga (t) 13:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

She Loves You
She Loves You is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy 17:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

DYK
Nice one! Cheers --Srikeit (Talk 19:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 5, September 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Ketuanan Melayu
Congratulations! I thought you both did a tremendous job reducing the size of the article and defending the choice to avoid chunking off whole sections, and the result and the superb article that will appear on the main page are to your credit. Not that you need to hear it, but keep up the great work! --RobthTalk 05:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Chinese Msian vs. Msian Chinese
Please vote at Talk:Chinese_Malaysian. You opinion is appreciated. __earth (Talk) 02:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Commylegionvsfett.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Commylegionvsfett.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

A Day in the Life
A Day in the Life is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. LuciferMorgan 19:53, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiEN-l password etc.
Done. I've sent the password on to your gmail address and changed the setup to point to that email address. - Mark 03:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

A Hard Day's Night (song)
A Hard Day's Night (song) is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy 20:28, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Article to be deleted
There is an article about Michael Song, an alleged Malaysian blogger. It is apparently written by himself (checked the history) and this is apparently a spam article. Moreover, the link the the blog is dead. Therefore I suggest this article be deleted. Sorry to bother you because I am not familiar with the wikipedia deletion process. Thanks!

I have put Sam Vaknin on deletion review
I notice that you took the final decision to delete user Sam Vaknin, Since that time, administrator Zeraeph, who was his most vociferous critic, has herself been suspended for Wiki violations and verbal attacks. I recommend that the decision to delete Sam Vaknin should be looked at afresh ignoring any previous input from Zeraeph and her sockpuppets. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sam_Vaknin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Sam_Vaknin

I would be grateful if you can provide input on this deletion review. Thanks --Penbat 16:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 6, October 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

A Hard Day's Night
Hi, you contributed some time ago Image:Beatles-singles-a-hard-days-night-uk-1.jpg, supposedly representing the UK cover of A Hard Day's Night. Strangely Wikipedia also contains Image:Beatles - AHDN UK single.JPG, which is the same thing...but a different image. Which one is the real? Or am I missing something?--Chealer 04:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your answer. I attempted to rectify the image description.--Chealer 02:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Get Back
Get Back is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy 19:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson
Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy (Talk) 15:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

I Want to Hold Your Hand
I Want to Hold Your Hand is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy (Talk) 23:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Ketuanan Melayu
I've moved all the discussion that seemed to be about the subject rather then the article to a new subpage. I hope you don't mind. If you want to revert or just delete the off topic stuff, you're welcome. I did it the way it was done because I generally prefer to keep talk page stuff, even if off topic. I considered a general archive but felt it best to move the other stuff away so to try and make it clear it's not desired especially as some of it might be a bit offensive to some people. Just thought it wise to do a cleanup before it's featured and people come and see what's been said and respond Nil Einne 01:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Great job on this article, btw!

Recent edit to Economy of Malaysia
Hello. Thank you for your recent edit to Economy of Malaysia. Your edit included one or more links to the page Doctor, which is a disambiguation page. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can help Wikipedia by revising the links you added to Economy of Malaysia to refer directly to the most relevant topic. (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and report the error to help us improve this feature.) --Russ (talk) 15:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Cokebottles.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cokebottles.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --– Quadell (talk) (random) 20:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

U.S. Congress questions
Hi. I responded to a couple of questions you had posted on talkpages regarding questions about U.S. Congress articles. I hope the information is helpful, and I added some of it to the articles themselves, so your questions were doubly useful. I contribute to some of those articles so let me know if there's anything else you're wondering about. Regards, Newyorkbrad 17:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 7, November 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Real Love (The Beatles song)
Real Love (The Beatles song) is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy (Talk) 18:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

May 13 Incident
Thank you for reverting my revert on May 13 Incident. I missed the fact that it was inside a quote. Hu 14:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Hishammuddin Hussein
Stating factual things are not wrong in any manner. The username is not slur only the person notice it is slur in his thinking. Like the PM said berani kerana benar. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by pukiumno (talk • contribs).

User Dchua
Thanks for the headsup. I will revert his edit. If he reverts my reversion, then I'd produce citation. __earth (Talk) 09:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter Issue 8, December 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Request
Dear John,

I noticed that you have a lot of experience with getting articles to FA status. I have been working on the Ohio Wesleyan University page article and am trying to get it to FA status. I was wondering if you could provide some advice on how the article can be improved? Also, any contributions to it will be even more appreciated! Thank you so much for your time! I greatly appreciate it! WikiprojectOWU 01:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC)