User talk:Lee Vilenski/Archives/2019/October

Kenny Omega
Hi there, Lee Vilenski! Thank you so much again for reviewing the Kenny Omega article for GA. I really appreciated the necessary changes you pointed out. I have a question, however. I received a message on my talk page stating that the nomination has failed. Is the automated message simply a mistake? Thanks again! KyleJoan talk 10:05, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi - Legobot has an error currently that it gives you the fail message if you have already had a prior fail. My guess is that the failed GA template is higher than the GA template in terms of priority. Don't worry about it. It passed. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski  (talk • contribs) 10:19, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah, got it. Thanks again! KyleJoan talk  11:07, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Unregistered IP on Ronnie's page
Hi there, not sure if I should be doing this, but I wanted to give you a heads up on the unregistered IP that's started indiscriminately adding stuff to the Ronnie O'Sullivan lead. According to my watchlist, these edits need to be reviewed as they have 'r' next to them (?) but they're going live straight away and when I tried to revert/explain, they've just reverted back and soldiered on. Not sure what's the best thing to do. I'll persevere carefully, but maybe you'd like to step in at some point, as it might start to look like edit warring. Cheers, Rodney Baggins (talk) 17:03, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries. I had seen the IP, they did some changes to flagicon on the 2019 Paul Hunter Classic GAN, and at Steve Davis. Strictly speaking, it is edit warring, as it's not clear vandalism, probably best to start a topic on their talk page and explain. I'll revert anything I don't like. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks Lee. I don't like this: "He regained the world number one ranking in March 2019 after a nine year absence, this is the longest gap between holding the position in Snooker history." because it doesn't say higher up in that para that he gained the no.1 ranking in the first place (but maybe it should!) so the new sentence comes out of the blue and is nonsensical! Rodney Baggins (talk) 17:21, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm of the opinion the whole article needs a thorough re-write. I'd love to take to FA one day, as arguably the biggest cue sports article. I've got my hands full with some other things, and I'm not sure I have the skillset to do a BLP FA. Maybe a plan for another day.


 * I feel the bit about it being such a long time between number ones is important (and ledeworthy), but we should really have a couple sentences on his rankings in general IMO. There is too much about his "records", needs more on his career in general. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:27, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm of the opinion the whole article needs a thorough re-write.... yeah, agree, maybe I could help you with that some time!? In the meantime, I had a go at tidying up the lead, until someone else comes along and screws it up... Rodney Baggins (talk) 18:13, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * That is the primary issue with the article - far too visible. I'd personally rather work on the Stephen Hendry article and expand to GA. You did a good job, but it needs work in general. It's not too far from being demoted in its current form. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting typos
I really appreciate your help with Correct typos in one click. Would love to hear any feedback about the script. Thanks,&#32; Uziel302 (talk) 04:25, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * - it's probably one of the most nifty things I've seen! You don't need a separate program (like AWB), and it can be done quite easily on mobile (which is where I do about 50% of my edits. The only issue I found was that sometimes after completing a typo, the next one you attempt to fix will show as "deleted", or missing, but refreshing the page fixes this.


 * I'll give it a bit more of a go, and see if I can come up with anything more concrete. Great job. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 06:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If you go top to bottom it won't recognize every second paragraph. If you go botton up it will work good. The reason is that I use paragraph number and every edit changes the numbering of the following paragraphs.&#32; Uziel302 (talk) 06:49, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Isn't it problematic to have both scripts installed? Both change the project page.&#32; Uziel302 (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * My mistake, I just forgot to remove the old one. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski  (talk • contribs) 15:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

 * thank you! 100% of the credit should go to, who's organised this so very well. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:34, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I take your point, but now that they are an admin I worry about their head getting too big, so I thought that I would spread the blame around. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:49, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * In which case, I shall take the credit. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm a sysop? Really? Geez I wish someone had told me :). And yes Lee, AA, and Blue Moonset, deserve heaps of credit for the help and work they've all done with this drive. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2019 Six-red World Championship
valereee (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Singapore
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

30k GAs (for real this time)

 * Lucca Ashtear ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 11:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Daryl Peach
Hello! Your submission of Daryl Peach at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 19:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2019 Riga Masters
The article 2019 Riga Masters you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2019 Riga Masters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Listing Kenny Omega as a GA
Hi! I noticed that you promoted Kenny Omega as a GA recently, but didn't list it at Good articles/Sports and recreation, so I've done it in this edit. I assume it's just an oversight and that you usually do remember to list them, but just thought I'd let you know! Thanks. — Bilorv ( talk ) 10:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I thought I had done so. Thanks for fixing for me Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski  (talk • contribs) 12:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 China Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2017 China Open ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2019_China_Championship check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2019_China_Championship?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations
Enjoy your trip. Could you, before you leave, perhaps remove the icon from the Bengal famine DYK nom, and just make it a comment. Two editors spent a considerable part of their lives on the article, - saying nominated a few days late seems - out of proportion. Pleading --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:52, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's fine. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

c

Please comment on Talk:International Brigades
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:International Brigades. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2019 Six-red World Championship
The article 2019 Six-red World Championship you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2019 Six-red World Championship for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2016 World Snooker Championship
The article 2016 World Snooker Championship you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2016 World Snooker Championship for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:21, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Please ignore the auto message. Even though you withdrew it, I had to fail it for the nom to disappear. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2019 International Championship (snooker)
The article 2019 International Championship (snooker) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2019 International Championship (snooker) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2019 International Championship (snooker)
The article 2019 International Championship (snooker) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2019 International Championship (snooker) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ina Kaplan
The article Ina Kaplan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ina Kaplan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 13:01, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2019 Veldhoven Open
The article 2019 Veldhoven Open you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2019 Veldhoven Open for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2019 Veldhoven Open
The article 2019 Veldhoven Open you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2019 Veldhoven Open for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:01, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Pretend you got this on 5 October
I'm not on the committee. --Nessie (talk) 15:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your help
I'd like to find out where I can review a more detailed criteria for GA reviewing as I have been seriously told off by others for my doing almost the same thing as on the Keawepoepoe review. I don't have a problem working with others on difficult GA reviews but now I feel it is important to see exactly what the criteria really is. At any rate, I appreciate your help on the article and review. I hope I can seek your assistance in the future with questions.--Mark Miller (talk) 01:33, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, no problem! The GA criteria is a little weird, I suppose it comes down to the fact that the GA criteria themselves are left intentionally shallow. I'd ignore the actual criteria when reviewing to an extent, and remember you are making a "good article". I personally think these should be called "great articles", because it should be some of the best work on wikipedia (featured articles are similar, but should have next to no issues). Here's some things I look for on a GA review:
 * Quick fails - Check for copyright issues. This ones a big one. Do it first.
 * If the article is missing a serious amount of content (where you would expect some), it's not WP:BROAD
 * Referencing - is everything sourced? If not, it's WP:OR, and needs a source. That doesn't neccesarily mean every sentence, but every statement should be cited in some way.
 * Are all the sources reliable? Unreliable sources shouldn't really be in a GA, (there are a couple exceptions, but for now ignore this).
 * Are the references uniform? I like to have the same date format, archive-urls and things like ISBN and doi links exist. There's a few scripts that can do this, and I'd offer them to anyone who asks).
 * Notes, under most circumstances should have a citation too.
 * Prose - the WP:LEDE should be error free. I usually spend most of my time checking through the lede. A weak lede sucks. Things like having citations in the lede is usually a no-no for me.
 * Watch out for WP:INFOBOXCITE. If things are in the infobox, and not in the prose... Why not? (sometimes they can't be put in organically, but things like birth dates should be in there somewhere).
 * Is there bad wording? Spellng mistkes? Point it out in the review.
 * If something doesn't make sense (which can be quite common), point it out.

There are more things that I might add into an essay at some point if I get time. If you ever have any issues with a GAN, let me know. :) Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:19, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

GOCE review of Snooker
And congratulations on your marriage!
 * Thank you ! It's on Saturday, not long now! Thanks for your great work on the article. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposals regarding AfC & NPP
You are invited to comment at discussion currently taking place at Relationship of Articles for Creation and New Page Reviewer for pre-opinion on the combined functions of Articles for Creation (AfC) and New Page Review (NPR). This mass message invitation is being sent to subscribed members of the work group at the project The future of NPP and AfC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

A couple of barnstars for you!
My wedding present to you...

Best of luck. Rodney Baggins (talk) 10:41, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't have :0. Ironically, I almost did some work for World of Sport a couple years ago. :P. I'm sure I'll be still doing some wiki stuff around the wedding and honeymoon, (probably not on the day, but I've got a dyk hitting the main page that day... So..) but it'll likely be from my phone when I'm chilling, so in depth additions might be a little bit of an issue. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Happy First edit day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee,  PA TH  SL OP U  13:39, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BMW M3
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BMW M3. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Daryl Peach
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2010 World Team Championship
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Good Article Backlog Drive Barnstar

 * Thank you for all your hard work ! Now I know we are partners, I'll let the wife know! :P Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:37, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2019 Paul Hunter Classic
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Siouxsie Sioux
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Siouxsie Sioux. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2019 China Championship
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Air Combat 22.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Air Combat 22.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2019 Paul Hunter Classic
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 Paul Hunter Classic you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HawkAussie -- HawkAussie (talk) 00:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:21 Savage
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:21 Savage. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2019 World Open (snooker)
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Bible and homosexuality
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Bible and homosexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marharyta Fjafilawa
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marharyta Fjafilawa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 01:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marharyta Fjafilawa
The article Marharyta Fjafilawa you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marharyta Fjafilawa for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 01:41, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Mobile infantry
While I want this article kept, I think your "speedy keep" close is highly dubious and I wouldn't be surprised if it got challenged. It does not fit any of the criteria of WP:Speedy keep and since at least two editors were still arguing for something other than keep, it is controversial enough not be suitable for a non-admin closure. Note also that a "snowball clause" is not a speedy keep close, and the two should not be confused per WP:SK. In any case, WP:SNOW is a bit of a stretch for the same reasons. SpinningSpark 16:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. If it gets challenged I'll self revert or similar. Apologies if it's an error. Still getting my head around the non-admin closure rules. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:History of Christianity
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:History of Christianity. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Deletion review for Mobile infantry
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mobile infantry. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Told you so. You should have undone your close straight away. SpinningSpark 13:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not entirely familiar with DRV, so I hope I did the self-revert correctly. I had been meaning to do so before, but I didn't really have the time to check the policies on reverting closures like this. Please let me know if I've done anything incorrectly Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski  (talk • contribs) 14:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Deletion review/Log/2019 October 31
To answer your concern about process, self-reverting is a reasonably common occurrence, and it's often the best way to resolve a problem like this. I probably would have reverted the AfD close and left the DRV open for somebody else to close, but what you did was fine. Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know ! I've been trying to expand into a few new areas recently, but I like to be 100% before doing something dumb like revert out of place. Thanks again. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)