User talk:Mashaunix

Post Self genre edit
Hi! I'm the editor that started and did I guess 99.4% of the content on the Post Self article. Anyway, I saw that you changed the genre of Godflesh in the intro from industrial metal to experimental metal. I don't have an issue with this at all, that's not why I'm writing, I'm just curious to learn since I'm not a seasoned editor. Can you explain why the change is an improvement? Thanks! CelestialWeevil (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, I think that "experimental metal" is a good summary of the two major genres that Godflesh have been associated with most and credited with pioneering (industrial metal and post-metal) which is why I made it their lead genre on the band's page. For album articles, I think a band's genre in the lead should either match that on their page or be excluded completely, though I have seen no guidelines or discussions on this.-- MA SHAUN IX 21:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Makes perfect sense. Thanks for the response! CelestialWeevil (talk) 21:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Industrial music
I saw that you removed it from the African American, Italian American, and Latin American culture categories. So..who would you mostly associate it with? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8805:D401:3700:D940:9A80:BA34:DC7C (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Underground UK, US, and German culture in general. Cultural context must be discussed in the article, with all info backed by sources. I saw no evidence in the article that anyone ever connected industrial music as a movement specifically with the categories you mention, that's why I reverted you.-- MA SHAUN IX 17:51, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Post-metal
No, I said it was unsourced.  ~SML  •  TP  01:13, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi
Hello. This article is too long, need to omit some unnecessary paragraphs, help summarize this article (and copy edit). Thanks you. Olascf (talk) 13:28, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have no knowledge of or interest in this article.-- MA SHAUN IX 13:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Evo morales suma wiki page
Hello! Just to inform you I am Bolivian I reside here my whole life. THERE WAS NO COUP. A coup is when the military take over with violence. There is violence yes! But because of the former presidents people. They are coming from Other zones and terrorizing cities! They were paid $7-$30 depending evo morales régimen gave them weapons.

We the people protested pacifically during 21 days. We did not vandalize anything no body has paid us anything. It was all legitimate because our vote was stolen. Evo morales did the hugest fraud in history thinking we were not going to notice.

There was no coup!

this is a quick note so u can update this dictators wiki page.

Thanks! Fabsv (talk) 18:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, I understand. My edit in fact removed the onesided description of the event as a coup. I have no wish to edit further now. But my thoughts are with you, the people of Bolivia. May the unstable situation soon be resolved through fair elections, without any more bloodshed!-- MA SHAUN IX 18:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

I invite you to join the Guild of Copy Editors!
Hello Mashaunix - You greatly improved the Introduction for Jordan Peterson. When I read your edits I thought you must be a member of the Guild of Copy Editors because you write so well. However, after searching the Guild's membership roster, I discovered that you are not (yet) a member. We need editors who write in a clear, correct, concise, comprehensible, and consistent manner—like you! If you would like to join our august body, here are the instructions from the Guild's home page:

Membership of the Guild of Copy Editors is informal and is not monitored. To be considered a member you can:


 * add your name to the List of Participants;
 * add to your userpage, which will automatically add you to Category:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors members;
 * join our mailing list to get regular newsletters with information about our activities.

Because of the nature of our project, members who copy edit articles listed on our Requests page should have a high level of skill with English spelling, grammar and punctuation. Requests are often being prepared for promotion to Good Article, A-class or Featured Article status, all of which require prose that is clear, concise, and error-free. Good judgement is often required when deciphering the meaning of confusing passages of text and considering how to best clarify it without altering its meaning.

All the best  - Mark D Worthen PsyD   (talk)   (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.)  20:49, 6 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Looking back, thanks again for the invitation and the star!-- MA SHAUN IX 13:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

"Singapoor" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Singapoor. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Your recent editing history at Karl Marx shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

you're on the cusp :-) -Snowded TALK 18:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the warning, next time I'll go straight to the talk page! Wonder what it says about me that when I do something like this it's the article about Marx, but only an insignificant detail.-- MA SHAUN IX 21:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

CONTACT YOU
User:Mashaunix I want to contact you because of a complaint that I want to comment on, but I wish it were in private. You could give me your email and I could contact and mention you about a project, thanks. User:Devils greens12
 * Hello, I am sorry but I do not have time to work on any Wikipedia projects at the moment!-- MA SHAUN IX 19:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

SHAUN I didn't know how to explain it to you, I'm sorry, there is a definition and a story which I would like you to support me in enforcing this edition.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grindcore&oldid=1022727510 (check out precursors and you will know what I mean)

I saw in the history of that page that you also agreed that this comes exclusively from punk, this article reinforces that idea, I wish you would review it. My colleague adds information to the precursors part accordingly, he changes the general summary at the top, however this is not valid for an administrator. You can appreciate the quotes and interviews that he attached to his work. User:Devils greens12

"Postcore" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Postcore. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  danny music editor  oops 15:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

"Eastern theology" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Eastern theology and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

"Great Britain (country)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Great Britain (country) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Balkovec (talk) 15:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Doom (videogame)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Doom (videogame) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 8 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 07:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Melodicore


A tag has been placed on Melodicore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Indiecore listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indiecore&redirect=no Indiecore] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Notifying you as you created this redirect in 2015. Moline1 (talk) 9:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC) Moline1 (talk) 14:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

"List of members of the Beatles" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_members_of_the_Beatles&redirect=no List of members of the Beatles] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Thryduulf (talk) 17:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Mashaunix! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:58, Monday, October 23, 2023 (UTC)

"Black up" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_up&redirect=no Black up] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. GnocchiFan (talk) 17:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

History of Christianity
I have listed this article for GA reassessment. Others agree with your view that Eastern Christianity is not adequately covered. I would really appreciate your help with that. It does take a real commitment to write content on Wikipedia, but I can help with that. We can collaborate. Perhaps you could begin by suggesting what major topics are missing from this article. Jenhawk777 (talk) 17:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'm really sorry but currently I don't have space to offer help or suggestions beyond what I already gave on the talk page. Maybe try to find an easy introductory source on the history of both the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Oriental Orthodox Churches, whether online or in print, and see what the major chapters of the story are there and how it relates to the story of the Catholic and Protestant churches. Best of luck.🙏 -- MA SHAUN IX 10:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

"Clean vocalist" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clean_vocalist&redirect=no Clean vocalist] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

"Technical music" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Technical_music&redirect=no Technical music] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)