User talk:NotOrrio/Archives/ 1

File copyright problem with File:902-Scania-K310UB-with-transdev-livery-at-Springvale-Station.png
Thank you for uploading File:902-Scania-K310UB-with-transdev-livery-at-Springvale-Station.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Whpq (talk) 12:53, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Route 902, Victorian Bus Route, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chelsea railway station. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Route 902, Victorian Bus Route


The article Route 902, Victorian Bus Route has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 07:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Route 902, Victorian Bus Route for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Route 902, Victorian Bus Route is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Route 902, Victorian Bus Route until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Dan arndt (talk) 11:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Important (read before sending a new topic)
I will be taking a break off wikipedia from 30th November 2022 to December 20th 2022 I may use wikipedia to collect information but i won't be editing where it wont be needed nor I will be using my talk page.

So anyways what happened? You might understand how frustrating it is when someone wants you to delete your work. Well that happened to me but with two wikipedia pages  901 (PTV Bus) and 903 (PTV Bus). With people wanting the page to be deleted with their illogical points espacially User:Whpq and User:Trainsandotherthings who see deletion of these pages as the only solution. If you do have any enquiries between the date this comment was posted and 30th November I will try to respond. If you have enquiries from 30th November and 20th december please post them but note i won't address them before 20th December. I just want to forget about this and move on anyways thank you NotOrrio (talk) 03:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Transport of Australia Articles by Quality


The page Transport of Australia Articles by Quality has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

"Category page in main space"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 00:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Transport of Australia Articles by Quality


A tag has been placed on Category:Transport of Australia Articles by Quality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Australian transport
Hello, NotOrrio,

I was wondering if this WikiProject is still going on. I work with categories and I was wondering whether or not those involving this WikiProject would still be needed. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 1 December 2022 (UTC)


 * all members have withdrawn from the wikiproject so there isnt really a need to keep it or even the wikiproject it self NotOrrio (talk) 00:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello? You started a victorian transport page without consultation anywhere, then another user started the australian transport page without consultation, and quit on the spot over a very trivial issue - if it was put through a process as required at the link that you have deleted - it could be put to the australian editing community, and at least a wider discussion could in fact be processed as to the suitability of the project.  There is a need for such a project and you must understand that there are editors other than yourself who would be interested to be involved.  It is better to recuse yourself from any judgement about the process - as you show no sign of having looked at project council or its requirements.  JarrahTree 06:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Well, it looks like all of those concerns are moot as the WikiProject is already over and done with. But advice for any future WikiProjects you want to launch. Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shuttle bus (December 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SounderBruce was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shuttle bus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shuttle_bus Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SounderBruce&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shuttle_bus reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Sounder Bruce  10:17, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shuttle bus has been accepted
 Shuttle bus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Shuttle_bus help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   01:28, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melbourne bus route 601 (December 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melbourne bus route 601 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Melbourne_bus_route_601 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EchidnaLives&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Melbourne_bus_route_601 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  08:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monash railway station (December 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monash railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Monash_railway_station Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EchidnaLives&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Monash_railway_station reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  08:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cranbourne railway line
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cranbourne railway line you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 10:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cranbourne railway line
The article Cranbourne railway line you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cranbourne railway line for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 11:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Care to explain this?
I'm giving you one chance to explain yourself before I seek sanctions against you. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * the image was made 2 months ago we had a beef over those deletion discussions i havent touched the image since i originally uploaded it NotOrrio (talk) 15:25, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You've been much better the past month or so, but do not ever upload anything like that again. That's a blatant WP:NPA violation and things like that will get you blocked, okay? In light of it being two months old I'm not going to pursue this any further. Consider yourself warned. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:28, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 903 (PTV Bus) (January 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:903 (PTV Bus) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:903_(PTV_Bus) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EchidnaLives&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:903_(PTV_Bus) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  05:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 902 (PTV Bus) (January 4)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:902_(PTV_Bus) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Been decided that this bus route is not notable - see comment from Dan below, and you may wish to see the AfD discussion about this route (see the deletion log for this page - Articles for deletion/902 (PTV Bus)).

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 14:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Requested move that may be of interest to you
I have requested a move of List of Victoria Government Infrastructure Plans, Proposals and Studies to List of Victorian Government infrastructure plans, proposals and studies. You can comment on the requested move at Talk:List of Victoria Government Infrastructure Plans, Proposals and Studies. Steelkamp (talk) 05:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

City Loop article
Hi NotOrrio. I've recently discovered that you have been rebuilding the City Loop article. Just had a few pointers to send the article in the right direction.

-The city loop is not a subway. Its a piece of infrastructure on a commuter rail line

-The loop itself isn't a rail line. It's a piece of infrastructure. In the infobox, Connecting lines, Operator(s), and Rolling stock implies that the tunnel is its own train line. In the history section of the infobox, Commenced implies that the rail line commenced operations in 1971, not when construction began (also it isn't a rail line- its infrastructure). HoHo3143 (talk) 10:47, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Rebuilding the Cranbourne railway line article
Hi NotOrrio. As promised in this discussion, I will now begin to rebuild the Cranbourne railway line article. I can still spot numerous issues, especially pertaining to spelling, grammar, and referencing, amongst others. I will remove the article from the list of GA nominations and begin work shortly. Once this work has been completed I'll renominate the article for GA status. During this time, preferably do not edit the article, instead you can make suggestions in the talk section of the page. HoHo3143 (talk) 03:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Rail transport in Victoria
Rail transport in Victoria has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Steelkamp (talk) 13:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Template for link to railway stations in Australia
Now sure if you are aware of Template:Rwsa, very useful for adding links to Australian stations. Eg: Make adding links easier. --ThylacineHunter  (talk) 06:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * instead of
 * instead of

Your submission at Articles for creation: Route 601 (Melbourne) has been accepted
 Route 601 (Melbourne), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Route_601_(Melbourne) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Route 901 (SmartBus) has been accepted
 Route 901 (SmartBus), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Route_901_(SmartBus) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Merge discussion
A current discussion may be of interest to you about merging the Melton railway line article with the Ballarat V/Line rail service article. View the discussion here. HoHo3143 (talk) 07:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Huntingdale railway station
The article Huntingdale railway station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Huntingdale railway station and Talk:Huntingdale railway station/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Marshelec -- Marshelec (talk) 22:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Good article nominations
Hi, thanks for your hard work in responding to my GA review comments on Huntingdale railway station. I know this can be a tiresome process, but hopefully you will be pleased with the final outcome. I see that you have three other GA nominations in the queue at WP:GAN. I may be willing to review another of your submissions, but I am conscious that it takes a lot of your time and energy to respond to a review. Please let me know when you expect to have availability to respond to review comments on another of your nominated articles, and also, which of these you prefer to work on first. (It is best if the review does not commence until you are ready to respond in a reasonably timely manner). Cheers  Marshelec (talk) 03:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)


 * just to point out if you do wish to review any other of those articles I suggest not reviewing the Oakleigh station article for now one as it has a few issues present in this article i wish to fix first. Anyways I do thank you for giving your time to reviewing this article NotOrrio (talk) 04:44, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Victorian transport symbols
Hi @NotOrrio. Thanks for the work you are doing to rebuild and update the Melbourne train stations article. Just for reference, here is the correct (as done throughout wikipedia and PTV messaging) order of Victorian transport symbols for the connections column of the table. When you add these symbols, keep them in the correct order just adding or subtracting the ones that aren't necessary. HoHo3143 (talk) 07:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Huntingdale railway station
The article Huntingdale railway station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Huntingdale railway station and Talk:Huntingdale railway station/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Marshelec -- Marshelec (talk) 07:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Congratulations on getting your first article to GA standard. It is hard work, but I hope you are satisfied and pleased with the outcome. The bot will shortly add the GA icon to the article, notify you, and also clean up the talk page. Marshelec (talk) 22:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Huntingdale railway station
The article Huntingdale railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Huntingdale railway station for comments about the article, and Talk:Huntingdale railway station/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Marshelec -- Marshelec (talk) 22:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of bus stops in Victoria
Hello, NotOrrio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of bus stops in Victoria, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Station list distances
I'll continue updating the rest tomorrow and add the reference to where they are sourced from. These are official Metro Trains distances. -- ThylacineHunter  (talk) 14:07, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parliament railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parliament railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The person who loves reading -- The person who loves reading (talk) 15:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Monash railway station
Hello, NotOrrio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Monash railway station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Clyde railway extension
Hello, NotOrrio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clyde railway extension, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:903 (PTV Bus)
Hello, NotOrrio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:903 (PTV Bus), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:902 (PTV Bus)
Hello, NotOrrio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:902 (PTV Bus), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

you will need to ask for help
It is strongly advised that you ask for help. Almost every message you make has spelling problems - you either need to have a spellcheck or grammar check, as to set up a major project like the Australian Transport project, it is well worth asking for help. JarrahTree 08:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @JarrahTree
 * Thank you for reaching out, I had poorly phrased my original message and I have clarified what I was trying to say. Two users who have shown support towards the project are willing to help setup I will try reach out with them. NotOrrio (talk) 09:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * well worth the effort! It was relatively easy years ago to start the maritime history project, but the full size of the transport project needs very careful discussions... hopefully you have helpers with time to help... JarrahTree 09:35, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Template:User WikiProject Australian Transport
Hello, NotOrrio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:User WikiProject Australian Transport, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Monash railway station


Hello, NotOrrio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Monash railway station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

A standard for Melbourne train station articles
Hi @NotOrrio. Thanks for all the great progress you have made with updating articles about Melbourne train stations. As we are pretty much the only two people updating Melbourne station articles, I'd like to create a standard that ensures that all of these articles are similar. There is another similar structure that has been created for Singapore MRT stations which I drew inspo for the Melbourne one. I've created the essay which you can view here. If we both work to this structure, it can feature on the Australian Transport Wikiproject as something that the Victorian community follows.

Let me know your thoughts on this so we can formalise the structure, use it on new articles (that we rebuild) and update GA to align with the new structure. HoHo3143 (talk) 12:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @NotOrrio- have you seen this? If you're able to, I'd like to work on this guide so it can be added to the Aussie transport wiki project once that is ready. Thanks HoHo3143 (talk) 09:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @HoHo3143 read through and looks pretty good would be worth mentioning how to show transport connections for stations that have bus and tram stops on multiple streets/stroads/roads NotOrrio (talk) 07:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @NotOrrio I've gone and added a sentence and an example for the issue you raised. Do you think this is better? If so, let me know. HoHo3143 (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * agree - yeah, good on you!  you got it going!  well done!   JarrahTree 15:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:903 (PTV Bus)


Hello, NotOrrio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "903".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

For your interest
Thought you might be interested in this: User:Fork99/Current projects. Cheers, Fork99 (talk) 04:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SmartBus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SmartBus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 13:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oakleigh railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oakleigh railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaxnaCarta -- MaxnaCarta (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jordanville railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jordanville railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 (talk) 04:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jordanville railway station
The article Jordanville railway station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jordanville railway station and Talk:Jordanville railway station/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 (talk) 08:44, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of City Loop
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article City Loop you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 10:41, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mount Waverley railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mount Waverley railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DimensionalFusion -- DimensionalFusion (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parliament railway station
The article Parliament railway station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Parliament railway station and Talk:Parliament railway station/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The person who loves reading -- The person who loves reading (talk) 20:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Clayton railway station, Melbourne
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clayton railway station, Melbourne you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:40, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Clayton railway station, Melbourne
The article Clayton railway station, Melbourne you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Clayton railway station, Melbourne and Talk:Clayton railway station, Melbourne/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Syndal railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Syndal railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kj cheetham -- Kj cheetham (talk) 10:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Syndal railway station
The article Syndal railway station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Syndal railway station and Talk:Syndal railway station/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kj cheetham -- Kj cheetham (talk) 11:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Glen Waverley railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Glen Waverley railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kj cheetham -- Kj cheetham (talk) 11:41, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carnegie railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carnegie railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bneu2013 -- Bneu2013 (talk) 04:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carnegie railway station
The article Carnegie railway station you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Carnegie railway station for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bneu2013 -- Bneu2013 (talk) 04:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SmartBus
The article SmartBus you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:SmartBus for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 14:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oakleigh railway station
The article Oakleigh railway station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Oakleigh railway station and Talk:Oakleigh railway station/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaxnaCarta -- MaxnaCarta (talk) 04:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oakleigh railway station
The article Oakleigh railway station you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Oakleigh railway station for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaxnaCarta -- MaxnaCarta (talk) 22:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)