User talk:Osvaldo valdes 165443

Welcome!
Hello, Osvaldo valdes 165443, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! South Nashua (talk) 15:38, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iglesia del Espíritu Santo, Havana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presbytery ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Iglesia_del_Esp%C3%ADritu_Santo%2C_Havana check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Iglesia_del_Esp%C3%ADritu_Santo%2C_Havana?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation Fixed

 * presbytery

Disambiguation link notification for November 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Candler College and Colegio Buenavista, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Oratory and Athletics ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Candler_College_and_Colegio_Buenavista check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Candler_College_and_Colegio_Buenavista?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radiocentro CMQ Building, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CMQ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Radiocentro_CMQ_Building check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Radiocentro_CMQ_Building?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Hotel Tryp Habana Libre
Osvaldo, I'm excited to see you're so interested in Cuban history, but your continued revisions to the page for this hotel are troubling. You've now twice deleted almost the entire gallery. You've placed historical photos which may still be under copyright on the page. You placed them within the body of the article, making it difficult for mobile users to read the article. Having all the photos at the end in one gallery is much easier for mobile users than having them throughout the article. You added sections, which is fine, but you turned all the sub-sections into individual sections. Some of the names you gave them are not even in English. The photo you added for your "Ley revolucionaria" section is unrelated to the hotel, it's about banks being nationalized. Everyone here is glad to see new members who want to help, but I've been helping to maintain this page for years, I wrote the majority of the text. I want to be sure it stays as clear and accurate and easy to read for an English-speaking audience as possible. jamesluckard (talk) 23:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)


 * thank you for the note. I thought the photo gallery (is) excessive, repetitive and uninformative (same with Hotel Nacional de Cuba. I was just following Wki protocol to '(not) use images or galleries excessively.' there is more on my talk page re. photographs because I've been down this road, I used to "load up" galleries with "repetitive" photographs. I can refer you to various pages where the photographs are in the body of the article as Wikipedia advises, so, that is the law. Can you honestly say that an article such as Age of Enlightenment (one among thousands) would be better served with all the photos in a gallery? Further, the argument that we should ALL consider users of a portable device is not a good argument let alone an argument.


 * As far as the Revolutionary Law, there wasn't a different law (yes, they had different "eyewash" numbers) and an attendant poster for banks, schools, another for factories, hotels, restaurants, residences, sugar mills, and another one for cemeteries. EVERYTHING was nationalized, stolen, at once. In your article "Castro announced in a speech to the Restaurant and Hotel Workers Federation.." well, who exactly was the Restaurant and Hotel Workers Federation? Where do you mention that they were the owners of the hotel?


 * At any rate, I put a block on the pages this morning (sorry, I thought you were a vandal), I will wait a few days for you to reconsider, However, if you don't do the appropriate research regarding the use of the photographs, I will take the issue up with an administrator. Kind regards.
 * Please review WP:GALLERIES ...

Images make Wikipedia more informative, accessible, and professional.


 * I appreciate that you're trying to help, but titling a section in Spanish, like "Ley revolucionaria", is very confusing for English speakers, and it's also overly specific. It is clearer to have the section be about the Revolution in general. The photo of the sign doesn't make clear how it's in any away related to the hotel. The first paragraph states, with a proper source, that the hotel belonged to the pension fund of the catering workers' union. There is value to including a few photos at key points in extremely long articles, like the one you mentioned, but this is a short article, I can't see how it helps to have photos in the middle of it.jamesluckard (talk) 01:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Hotel Nacional de Cuba
Osvaldo, I see you've also undone the corrections I made to the Hotel Nacional page. As with the Hotel Habana Libre, please do not delete the gallery. Again, adding sections is perfectly fine, but they need sub-sections, every part of the history cannot be its own section. They also need to be in a logical and chronological order. In addition, you deleted random words throughout, such as the words "historic hotel" in the first sentence. I have restored them. Also, I don't think Wikipedia rules allow the extensive quote you have about the Taganana Hill, or the historical photos, which may be copyrighted. However, if you'll notice, I did not delete the text or photos, because I don't feel it's my place to delete anything another user adds. If someone else nominates it for deletion though, they will probably be within the rules. We all want these pages to be as helpful as possible to general readers. jamesluckard (talk) 23:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ditto for the HN, Read above... ovA_165443 (talk) 01:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Osvaldo, If you really want to delete the galleries, go ahead. I'm not sure who is helped by deleting them, but I won't fight you on that. But please do not delete text from the articles for no reason, and please leave the organization with sections and sub-sections, in chronological order, it is very confusing otherwise. Thanks, James. jamesluckard (talk) 01:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Stephan Balint.png
Thanks for uploading File:Stephan Balint.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Penn Station, Office of Mc Kim, Mead and White Sketch.png


A tag has been placed on File:Penn Station, Office of Mc Kim, Mead and White Sketch.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ɱ (talk) 15:05, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Penn Station, Office of Mc Kim, Mead and White Sketch.png


The file File:Penn Station, Office of Mc Kim, Mead and White Sketch.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Improper license - not the user's creation. No evidence of creation or publication by McKim, Mead and White, no evidence it is in the Public Domain."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ɱ (talk) 15:08, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * This file is my own photo. taken from original McKim, Mead, White drawings located at the New York Historical Society Library. ovA_165443 (talk) 15:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:La Casa de Beneficencia y Maternidad de La Habana.png
Thanks for uploading File:La Casa de Beneficencia y Maternidad de La Habana.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ashlar into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. 💴Money💶💵emoji💷Talk💸Help out at CCI! 01:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note; this is the second time I copy from Wikipedia the other time was in Havana Plan Piloto and wasn't sure how to do it...thanks again! ovA_165443 (talk) 01:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Osvaldo valdes 165443

Thank you for creating Havana Plan Piloto.

User:Money emoji, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

💴Money💶💵emoji💷Talk💸Help out at CCI! 22:10, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, where are you seeing this ERROR message?...can't find it. ovA_165443 (talk) 23:58, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barrio de San Lázaro, Havana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Maceo ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Barrio_de_San_L%C3%A1zaro%2C_Havana check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Barrio_de_San_L%C3%A1zaro%2C_Havana?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Entrance to apartment at lower level FOCSA Building.jpg


The file File:Entrance to apartment at lower level FOCSA Building.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused file, and it's a picture of...stairs. Don't see any value in keeping it."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. creffett (talk) 23:44, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Your addition to Sans Souci Cabaret has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. This edit which you say was copied from Razzle (game) was also adding text from https://cuban-exile.com/doc_176-200/doc0193.html, which did not exist in the Razzle article. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

A missing answer
Here's a link to me answering Alistair1978's question, that I've tried to point out before. If a talk page comment is beneath another and indented, you can safely read it as being a deliberate reply to it. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is OWN and IDHT issues on Talk:FOCSA Building. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   00:38, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

List of buried people
Would like to know if there is a list of deceased people at Colon Cemetery? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:58B:8402:1A90:D4B2:33D2:FE44:664F (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. El_C 15:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Please could you be more specific what you mean? Thanks! ovA_165443 (talk) 18:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Putting the lead of an article into a hatnote template would be an example of this, per WP:LEGITHAT. Among other reasons not to do this, it stops the text from appearing when a user tries to print the article out. Generally speaking, if an edit causes an article to look significantly different from all other Wikipedia articles (even if you think it looks better!), it's probably going against the manual of style. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok, sorry...thank you! ovA_165443 (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, you added it back and seem to be adding it to other articles as well? It's breaking the articles in every case: click "Printable version" on any of them and you'll see that the first paragraph isn't displayed. You shouldn't use the hatnote template like this. --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry, sorry trying to get it right...apologies. ovA_165443 (talk) 16:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Say if you need any help! --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:32, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


 * but "printable version" of FOCSA Building starts with History and does not show the hatnote...Same thing with Barrio de San Lázaro, Havana...help!ovA_165443 (talk) 16:54, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


 * That's how it's meant to work: a Hatnote is mainly just for linking to other articles, like the "other uses" and "dog breed" links at the top of Havana. It's expected that the reader wouldn't want that kind of "did you mean?" navigation actually printed out, if they were making a physical copy of the article.
 * What are you trying to add to the articles with these hatnote templates? Are you trying to write something like:
 * Or are you just aiming for a better visual look by indenting and italicising the lead sections? Or something else? --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Or are you just aiming for a better visual look by indenting and italicising the lead sections? Or something else? --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I see, was under impression that EVERY article gets a hatnote template...
 * really just the first words of the body of text. ovA_165443 (talk) 17:11, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay. Remember that the opening section of an article is meant to be "an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents" that "should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article" (MOS:LEAD) - if it's a substantial article, the lead section should be more than just a single sentence. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


 * yes, that helps...I'll go back and fix! ovA_165443 (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Acueducto de Albear, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martín Pérez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Aerial view, Plaza del Vapor.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Aerial view, Plaza del Vapor.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dylsss(talk contribs) 20:14, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Quinta de los molinos moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Quinta de los molinos, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quinta de los molinos (July 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quinta de los molinos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Quinta de los molinos, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Quinta_de_los_molinos Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nightenbelle&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Quinta_de_los_molinos reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 15:33, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quinta de los molinos has been accepted
 Quinta de los molinos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Quinta_de_los_molinos help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 17:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Antonio Maceo monument, Havana


A tag has been placed on Antonio Maceo monument, Havana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://equestrianstatue.org/maceo-antonio/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 14:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Antonio Maceo monument, Havana
Hello Osvaldo valdes 165443! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Antonio Maceo monument, Havana, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.radioenciclopedia.cu/cultural-news/curiosities/a-monument-to-the-dignity-of-our-homeland-antonio-maceo-20140106/ https://www.tripcuba.org/monument-to-antonio-maceo-havana, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Antonio Maceo monument, Havana and send an email with confirmation of permission to "[mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ]". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Antonio Maceo monument, Havana, in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ] or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Antonio Maceo monument, Havana. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Antonio Maceo monument, Havana with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Antonio Maceo monument, Havana saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Arquitectura Moderna
Hola Osvaldo, mi nombre es Joe y soy estudiante de arquitectura. Desde hace varios meses estoy estudiando la obra de Mario Romañach, a tal punto que he decidido colaborar en su perfil de wikipedia y corregir algunos errores y aportar más contenido. He visto que colabora bastante con wikipedia y ha escrito, entre otras cosas, varios artículos de arquitectura. Quisiera saber, si es posible, si tiene libros, documentos, fotos o cualquier cosa relacionada con el MoMo en Cuba y en particular, la obra de Romañach.

Nunca he usado wikipedia de esta forma, si no puede responder por esta via, le dejo mi email joeabreu1104@gmail.com

Muchas gracias de antemano Osvaldo. Joeabreu (talk) 22:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Arquitectura moderna
Hola Osvaldo, mi nombre es Joe y soy estudiante de arquitectura. Desde hace varios meses estoy estudiando la obra de Mario Romañach, a tal punto que he decidido colaborar en su perfil de wikipedia y corregir algunos errores y aportar más contenido. He visto que colabora bastante con wikipedia y ha escrito, entre otras cosas, varios artículos de arquitectura. Quisiera saber, si es posible, si tiene libros, documentos, fotos o cualquier cosa relacionada con el MoMo en Cuba y en particular, la obra de Romañach.

Nunca he usado wikipedia de esta forma, si no puede responder por esta via, le dejo mi email joeabreu1104@gmail.com

Muchas gracias de antemano Osvaldo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeabreu (talk • contribs) 22:37, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colon Cemetery, Havana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faith, Hope and Charity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Edit conflict on Havana
You can add an Under construction template to an article if you're working on it for a while and want other editors to step back until you've finished. I'll take a look at it again some time. Remember to attribute any text that you're copying in from other Wikipedia articles, if only with an edit summary of. --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much! ovA_165443 (talk) 16:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * My mistake, now that I see the template! You actually want in use to warn other editors to step back, under construction is for longer term editing. --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I figure that one by myself! Thank you !!! ovA_165443 (talk) 16:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

About your report on the Wikidata conflict page
Hello,

I invite you reading my answer to your reporting on the Wikidata conflict page. However, feel free reporting any other conflicts you may find in the future.

Sincerely yours,

2A02:2788:228:93D:4522:DA26:1BDE:4632 (talk) 18:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Osvaldo valdes 165443

Thank you for creating Amphitheatre of Old Havana.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Havana Architecture
Thank you for your drawings of the Havana Cathedral and other materials posted. As a first time visitor to Havana this month, I found this fascinating. I've never been to Europe so this is the first original Baroque building I have seen. Has anyone that you know of drawn 3d models of the cathedral?

I'd love to come back to Havana and have an architectural tour, if that were ever available. I'll definitely come back.

Muchas gracias,

Peter — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:800:2AC0:8156:6D2:D0E8:6BA1 (talk) 03:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, I don't know firsthand of any cathedral 3-d studies. I visited Havana in 2017 (grew up in Havana) and unfortunately did not go into the cathedral because it was closed. The seminary around the corner is of similar construction San Carlos and San Ambrosio Seminary. Unfortunately, many of the buildings in Havana are destroyed as is much of the City. I was particularly interested in Plaza del Vapor, Havana, however, the revolutionary government tore it down in 1959 which was a huge loss for Havana. I stayed at the FOCSA Building for ten days which was quite a find and did many of the drawings and diagrams. Also of interest are the Radiocentro CMQ Building by the same architect, and the Edificio del Seguro Médico, Havana by Quintana. At any rate, here's my page of all the articles I have worked on: User:Osvaldo valdes 165443 . ovA_165443 (talk) 16:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)





Speedy deletion nomination of Hermitage of the Catalans, Havana


A tag has been placed on Hermitage of the Catalans, Havana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.mundoobrero.es/pl.php?id=11651. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 15:07, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * That page is now blanked and listed here. Osvaldo valdes 165443, could you please explain, here on this page, why you thought it might be acceptable to translate content directly from the Spanish-language source or sources? I warned you about our copyright policy in November last year, and am disappointed to find you're still ignoring it. Please take this as a final warning: if you again copy content from a non-free external source into Wikipedia (whether or not by translation from another language), you may expect to lose your editing privileges in this project without further warning. So ... please don't! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:14, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I am sorry, the mistake was publishing the page before a chance to rewrite, you have made your point, well taken, bravo! Wikipedia states, "you may rewrite this page without "copyright-infringing material." I have admitted it, said I am sorry, was my mistake to go against Wikipedia internal policy, and attempted to fix it which I am allowed to do as per internal policy; what further explanations are you looking for? Copying text from other sources you might read the law on fair use; Wikipedia seems to needlessly have made an outlaw of every editor by taking away their protection of federal law!? However, can you please clarify why you feel Wikipedia, or I, are NOT protected per 17 U.S. Code S. 107 when copying content? And/or can you please explain why you believe "Noncommercial, nonprofit use is (NOT) presumptively fair use"? Please define "content from a non-free external source"? Why such content is exempt from 17 U.S. Code S. 107 and/or "transformation"? Finally, since you threatened me ("you may expect to lose your editing privileges in this project without further warning.), please be so kind to explain to me why you feel that Google is protected when copying entire books, Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc., but I presumably lose the protection of the exact same Federal law when copying part of an article inside of Wikipedia? ovA_165443 (talk) 14:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Ignoring the remainder of your post here, which has little bearing on whatever internal rules Wikipedia uses; "fair use" does not apply when you don't indicate that you are quoting another text (directly or in translation) but are presenting text as your own words (even if you add the original as a source through a reference). As for your excuses, admittance of error, "before I had a chance to rewrite"... you seem to ignore that I had to repeatedly explain why it was a copyvio, while you pretended innocence and hid behind "Earwig says 0%", instead of immediately starting with at least admitting that it was a translation you had posted. Your "before I had a chance to rewrite" would perhaps have been believable if you didn't need to scramble yesterday to remove similar copyvios which you had added in January 2022. This makes it clear that this isn't a case of "oh, I inserted these copyvios but was going to remove or rewrite them real soon" but a case of "oops, I'm caught yet again, quick make up some excuses while I hide older problems". I think you would be wise to drop the fake outrage and just commit to follow the rules in the future. Fram (talk) 13:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Fake outrage, caught? You're back-peddling, obfuscating by "Ignoring the remainder." Isn't it clear it is a translation? "Don't indicate that you are quoting," well, pray tell, how-when did you first find the quoted material, the hidden website? Ingeniously, not answering my questions as if you could, "Ignoring the remainder", continues to violate everyone's federal protection and rights. Since you started this soup, and threatened me, I'll wait for your answer to all my questions.  ovA_165443 (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Please be aware of WP:NLT and that you are rather misinterpreting your "federal protection and rights". This is a private website, if they want to impose a rule that you may be banned if you use the word "and" in a post they are free to do so. And no, it wasn't clear that it was a translation, just like most of your other copyright violations. That's not how sources work, indicating a source doesn't mean that you have simply translated their text. Fram (talk) 14:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Is the website in English? "it wasn't clear that it was a translation" so now you are lying? "Federal protection and rights" are not diminished by a private website especially one in the U.S. A private website does not permit it to be used as a club. You threatened and insulted me and now you want to hide under a "private website", really? Sure they may impose internal rules, but they cannot violate federal or state law, don't play stupid. At any rate answer the questions. ovA_165443 (talk) 15:17, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I have answered all the questions, and have no idea what I supposedly was lying about. Your articles, your text additions, don't make it clear at all that they are translations from other websites. "Threatening" that you may be blocked or banned if you don't follow the rules of this website is perfectly acceptable, no law will protect you from this. See e.g. Cuartel de Milicias, Havana: the section "history" is unsourced, but is a straight translation from here. Fram (talk) 15:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


 * You're playing stupid and lying, here are the questions you refused or were unable to answer,


 * 1-What further explanations are you looking for? (refer to text)


 * 2-Wikipedia has needlessly made an outlaw of every editor by blocking the protection of federal law, why?
 * 3-Explain why I can NOT be protected per 17 U.S. Code S. 107 when copying content?


 * 4-Explain why you believe "Noncommercial, nonprofit use is (NOT) presumptively fair use"? (Federal court disagrees)


 * 5-Define what is "content from a non-free external source"?


 * 6-Why is such content exempt by Wikipedia from 17 U.S. Code S. 107?


 * 7-Why is such content as per Fed. law exempt from "transformation"?


 * 8-Since you threatened me ("you may expect to lose your editing privileges in this project without further warning.), explain why Google is protected when copying entire books, Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc., but I presumably lose all the protection of the exact same Federal law when copying part of an article (inside of Wikipedia)? ovA_165443 (talk) 17:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Osvaldo valdes 165443, did not warn you that you would be blocked if you again violated our copyright policy, I did. That warning stands (please see below for another example of exactly what you may not do here).
 * Another thing you may not do in this project is direct personal remarks at other editors, as you did in your post immediately above this. Please immediately strike those unacceptable remarks (use .... to achieve that). Civility is one of the five pillars of this project; like our copyright policy, it is not negotiable – you either respect it or find something different to do with your time.
 * Rather than chopping logic over federal law, it would be helpful if you would start to compile, here on this page, a list of all articles where you have translated directly from a non-free Spanish-language source, identifying the source that you took the stuff from in each case.
 * , thank you for picking up Cuartel de Milicias, Havana, though I think the original source is probably this book from 1993/1995. If you come across any more of the same I'd be grateful if you'd mention it, either here or on my talk. If we find five instances then we're probably going to need (yet another) WP:CCI. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Cuartel de Milicias, Havana
Hello Osvaldo valdes 165443! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cuartel de Milicias, Havana, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://docplayer.es/59748276-Guia-de-arquitectura-la-habana-colonial.html (published 1993/1995), and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Cuartel de Milicias, Havana and send an email with confirmation of permission to "[mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ]". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Cuartel de Milicias, Havana, in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ] or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cuartel de Milicias, Havana. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Cuartel de Milicias, Havana with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Cuartel de Milicias, Havana saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no such violation except in Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please stop repeating "rewrite this article from scratch" ad nauseam, that is the problem. Google is protected when copying entire books, Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. but Wikipedia editors presumably lose the protection of the same Federal law!? In its attempt to avoid a lawsuit by creating a policy "developed by the community" it voids and invalidates the protection of 17 US Code § 107 to all editors. Someday we may read: "if you were a Wikipedia editor you are part of the biggest compensation settlement in the history of publishing." ovA_165443 (talk) 15:14, 14 June 2022 (UTC)


 * (restoring this response which may have been deleted in error, by all means delete it again if it was deliberate:) "There is no such violation except in Wikipedia's policies and guidelines." And that's all that's happening here: Wikipedia editors are applying its own policies to its own content, for the sake of itself and the sake of any teacher, writer or historian who wants to reuse its content. Wikipedia content is all CC-Attribution licenced. Somebody writing about the Cuartel de Milicias should be able to safely quote the text of your Wikipedia article, attributing your words to you, without unwittingly infringing the copyright of a Spanish publishing house.


 * If you can say which articles are based on close translations of copyrighted sources, that would be appreciated. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Stop inflating your collective egos. Read the Google case, try reading what I’ve been writing for days it will help you. Show me there’s a violation as per U.S. copyright law when anyone copies and stop listening to yourself. There are no words “attributed to me” that is you and your so called “community” mistake. You cannot sell whatever “you write” along w/ the legal notices should convince you are under a mass delusion that you are any type of expert on any subject let alone any type of author, please! ovA_165443 (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think anybody is accusing you of having broken US copyright law, only that you've broken Wikipedia's WP:COPYVIO policy. You're right that Wikipedia could likely host unlimited copyrighted content with impunity if it wanted to, but it doesn't want to, it wants to have its WP:COPYVIO policy, and as such, the copyrighted text you've added will have to be rewritten. Other editors would be happy to work with you on that, if you can list the articles you've worked on that include direct, uncredited translations of Mexican textbooks. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 03:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

I found another translation copyright problem at Arco de Belén, Havana. I have removed your editing privileges because the above conversations indicate that you are not willing to abide to our copyright policy and are not likely to do so without stronger intervention. If multiple editors are telling you that you are violating Wikipedia's editorial policies, it is very likely that you are. The only way to regain your editing privileges is to make an appeal that answers the following questions:


 * How is Wikipedia licenced?
 * Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
 * Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
 * How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? MER-C 03:12, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Investigation opened, see Contributor copyright investigations/20220623. MER-C 07:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

answers

 * How is Wikipedia licenced?


 * Copyright Act of 1976 as 17 U.S.C. Section 107 / the Berne Convention, international agreement governing copyright.


 * "Fair uses a doctrine in the United States law that permits limited use of copyrighted material without having to first acquire permission from the copyright holder...The doctrine of "fair use" originated in the Anglo-American common law during the 18th and 19th centuries as a way of preventing copyright law from being too rigidly applied and "stifling the very creativity which [copyright] law is designed to foster." Though originally a common law doctrine, it was enshrined in statutory law when the U.S. Congress passed the Copyright Act of 1976. The U.S. Supreme Court has issued several major decisions clarifying and reaffirming the fair use doctrine since the 1980s, most recently in the 2021 decision Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc." If you would answer my question:  why Google is protected when copying entire books, Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc., but I presumably lose the protection of the exact same Federal law when copying part of an article inside of Wikipedia? 


 * and from the Berne Convention...


 * "every production in the literary, scientific and artistic domain, whatever the mode or form of its expression" (Article 2(1) of the Convention).
 * the right to translate,
 * the right to make adaptations and arrangements of the work,
 * the right to recite literary works in public,
 * the right to broadcast (with the possibility that a Contracting State may provide for a mere right to equitable remuneration instead of a right of authorization),
 * the right to make reproductions in any manner or form (with the possibility that a Contracting State may permit, in certain special cases, reproduction without authorization, provided that the reproduction does not conflict with the normal :exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author; and the possibility that a Contracting State may provide, in the case of sound recordings of musical works, for a right to equitable remuneration),
 * the right to use the work as a basis for an audiovisual work, and the right to reproduce, distribute, perform in public or communicate to the public that audiovisual work.


 * Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?


 * This question assumes that copyrighted content is not allowed on Wikipedia and thus begs the question, please, cite the law (Copyright Act of 1976 as 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and the Berne Convention, international agreement) governing that does not allow copyright content!?


 * Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?


 * Please see Copyright Act of 1976 as 17 U.S.C. Section 107. ' "Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research." '


 * How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?


 * You have not established yet where I violated any law but a private corporate policy which necessarily comes under U.S. law. Nor have you shown how an internal "copyright policy" is compatible with U.S. Copyright law; mainly the Copyright Act of 1976 as 17 U.S.C. Section 107, or have you shown that Wikipedia is in fact not violating a different type of U.S. law when it restricts and/or prohibits access to the law? Having a corporate policy stating that Cubans cannot sit at the counter is against the law but why is this not clear to you that fair use is a legal doctrine that "promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances". Fair use permits "comment, teaching, scholarship, and research" and how are these endeavors incompatible with Wikipedia? I am not combative, belligerent, uncooperative, obtuse, quarrelsome, or radical as you imply and I genuinely have questions regarding the law. You blasted several pages without giving me a chance to "correct them", which I am allowed to do, and neither did you fix them and have refused me an answer but rather chose the office of judge, jury, and executioner. ovA_165443 (talk) 15:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Osvaldo valdes, as has already been explained above, your personal interpretation of US copyright law has exactly zero relevance here. All that matters to us is that you must understand, and agree to conform to, the copyright policy of this project. If you're not interested in doing that then your career here is over, which I believe would be a loss to the project.
 * If you do want to continue editing, please start by listing, here on this page, each and every article where you have translated even small amounts of content from non-free Spanish-language sources (and of course list the sources themselves also). That will greatly assist with the clean-up of the 179 articles that need to be checked, and will also improve your chances of being allowed to edit again. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You'll also need to follow the unblock process, having the answers to the questions as part of your appeal. See WP:GAB. I can state that you will not be unblocked as it stands now. MER-C 03:47, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Antonio Fernández de Trebejos y Zaldívar


A tag has been placed on Antonio Fernández de Trebejos y Zaldívar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ecured.cu/Antonio_Fern%C3%A1ndez_de_Trebejos_y_Zald%C3%ADvar. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Slywriter (talk) 20:36, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Humboldt 7 Massacre
I am new in Wikipedia ( editors mode). I am not sure if the article and photos related were added by you. In any case. Regarding the photograph which have the following text: Havana police at the door of apartment 201. The policeman with the glasses appears to be Lt. Colonel Esteban Ventura Novo. It called my attention the mentioned officer with sun glasses is ranked as Captain, so I suspected he was not Ventura Novo; who by the time of the events was a Lt Colonel and was no longer using uniform on daily bases. I looked in Internet and discovered this web: https://www.cubaperiodistas.cu/index.php/2017/04/la-masacre-de-humboldt-7/ Here the author mentions Captain Glery Hernández from 6th Police Station. I am not sure if correct, but it does match the rank in the uniform and also match other webs: https://picryl.com/media/el-capitan-glery-hernandez-de-la-6ta-estacion-de-policia-frente-a-la-puerta-24e520. Kind Regards. Ariam Delgado (talk) 18:11, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Bandstand of el Prado moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bandstand of el Prado, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maternidad Obrera de Marianao


A tag has been placed on Maternidad Obrera de Marianao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20201203080545/https://www.todocuba.org/maternidad-obrera-de-marianao-la-historia-del-centro-hospitalario-habanero-donde-han-nacido-miles-de-cubanos/-cubanos/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:40, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Stair from corridor to apartments.jpg


The file File:Stair from corridor to apartments.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not useful or used."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —&#8205;Mdaniels5757 (talk &bull; contribs) 18:11, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Stairs from elevator lobby to tower apartments FOCSA Bldg.jpg


The file File:Stairs from elevator lobby to tower apartments FOCSA Bldg.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not useful or used."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —&#8205;Mdaniels5757 (talk &bull; contribs) 18:12, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bandstand of el Prado
Hello, Osvaldo valdes 165443. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bandstand of el Prado, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bandstand of el Prado


Hello, Osvaldo valdes 165443. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bandstand of el Prado".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Malecón Antes de su construcción. Año 1900.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Malecón Antes de su construcción. Año 1900.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 January 2024 (UTC)