User talk:Pafcool2

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   04:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 01:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand this edit
Is your goal to show that Lights (Ellie Goulding song) is outstanding enough to warrant a separate article because it attracted a critical response? Just as with the sections on its music video, live performance, and release, this isn't something that raises Lights above any other single which satisfies notability. So I just don't understand your underlying assumptions, unless you believe that every single crossing the notability threshold ought to get an article, which is precisely what WP:NSONGS prohibits. - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 17:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, fair enough. By the by, I wish you would not misrepresent my position in this debate. I have said that this isn't about notability often enough that it really tests the limits of good faith to say that my "argument revolves around the idea that these articles aren't notable enough." I've made that point in response to your comment, but off-channel, I'd just ask that you stick to disagreeing with my actual position rather than a strawman. - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 17:50, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: Natasha discography
I am currently working on it. I was just doing it like that for the time being. Since they were released from different albums, and different years, they should be different. And since they also charted in a different year, it makes it easier. ℥nding · start 19:24, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikiproject British TV channels
This is a message from Wikiproject British TV channels. Please visit the main project page to reconfirm if you are actively taking part in the project and update your details. Many thanks. Auntie Beeb (talk) 00:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Ll front.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ll front.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cleanup-London
Template:Cleanup-London has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Croydon Labour Profile
Template:Croydon Labour Profile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Andre is born 17-05-05 017.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Andre is born 17-05-05 017.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:06, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Laleh Pourkarim, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page E-Type (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Natasha Bedingfield discography
I could not see how a song can be #88 on a top 40 chart so I reverted it. You must have meant some other chart. Just letting you so you can add this at the proper place. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Laleh Pourkarim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Associated newspapers logo.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Associated newspapers logo.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Croydon Fiveways for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Croydon Fiveways is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Croydon Fiveways until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Miniapolis  ( talk ) 22:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Start Supertram Stop
Template:Start Supertram Stop has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 04:07, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Start Supertram box
Template:Start Supertram box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 04:07, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barnard Marcus


The article Barnard Marcus has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced since 2010.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update
Hey Pafcool2. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:25, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Bartlett School of Architecture Logo.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Bartlett School of Architecture Logo.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Bartlett School of Architecture Logo.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Bartlett School of Architecture Logo.jpg

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:London bus operators
Template:London bus operators has been nominated for merging with Template:Bus companies in Greater London. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — lfdder 17:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of ITunes Festival: London 2010 (Ellie Goulding EP) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ITunes Festival: London 2010 (Ellie Goulding EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Festival: London 2010 (Ellie Goulding EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  → Lil- ℧niquԐ 1 - {  Talk  } -  01:50, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ITunes Festival 2010 Ellie Goulding.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:ITunes Festival 2010 Ellie Goulding.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Taniec z Gwiazdami.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Taniec z Gwiazdami.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Arena home.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arena home.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC) -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

My Free Sport listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect My Free Sport. Since you had some involvement with the My Free Sport redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sjung track listing
Template:Sjung track listing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:38, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UCL Urban Laboratory Logo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:UCL Urban Laboratory Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Park Place.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Park Place.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Croydon Vision 2020 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Croydon Vision 2020 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Croydon Vision 2020 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 21:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Island, Croydon


The article The Island, Croydon has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unremarkable residential building, fails WP:NBUILD."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus 14:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Altitude 25


The article Altitude 25 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unremarkable residential building, fails WP:NBUILD."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus 14:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cherry Orchard Road


The article Cherry Orchard Road has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable road and building development. Fails WP:GEOROAD and WP:NBUILD"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus 14:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Croydon Vocational Tower


The article Croydon Vocational Tower has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable proposed building. Fails WP:NBUILD, WP:CRYSTAL."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus 14:48, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of The Island, Croydon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Island, Croydon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Island, Croydon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pontificalibus 18:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Croydon and Gatwick weatherbox
Template:Croydon and Gatwick weatherbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 22:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Party political make-up of Croydon Council
Template:Party political make-up of Croydon Council has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Croydon2020.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Croydon2020.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gatewayarena.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Gatewayarena.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Invite to Revive WikiProject:Shopping Centers!
Hey there, Pafcool2! I'm Windyshadow32, a new member of the sadly inactive Wikiproject Shopping Centers. I am trying to revive this project to highlight the unique stories of malls across the country and the world especially as we lose more and more of them. Undoubtedly, we will lose shopping malls due to the challenges we face at this moment. Your account was listed as involved in the project, and I would like to know if you would like to help revive it! I would love to have your help with assessing the quality of articles and putting them in proper categories. I can't take on this massive project without you! Please let me know if you'd be willing to help; I really appreciate it!

Windyshadow32 (talk) 06:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pi Magazine, October 2012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pi Magazine, October 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Retail Importance Assessment
Hi Pafcool2! Since you're a member of WikiProject: Retailing, wanted to let you know we're currently discussing importance assessment criteria for the project on the talk page. Thanks! Tfkalk (talk) 23:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bartlett School of Architecture Logo.jpg


The file File:Bartlett School of Architecture Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "orphaned image with no evidence that it has ever been used. Insufficiently detailed source information for me to transfer to Commons."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr   Tex  04:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Coordinators and help needed
Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you. Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Nomination for deletion of Template:BAFLPrimaryColor
Template:BAFLPrimaryColor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BAFLSecondaryColor
Template:BAFLSecondaryColor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of the London Borough of Croydon


A tag has been placed on Category:Images of the London Borough of Croydon indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of ProLine (company) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ProLine (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ProLine (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Imcdc (talk) 03:59, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Brothers 2003.jpg


The file File:Brothers 2003.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused personal photo. Out of scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 11:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Laleh, Some Die Young Intl Release.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Laleh, Some Die Young Intl Release.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 15:19, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

List of parks and open spaces in the London Borough of Croydon
Hope you like my improvements to the article you started in 2007! &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The main information which is missing from this list, are the coordinate locations of each park. I don't suppose you would be able to get this information? There is a map and pointer on the council's webpage, but I can't extract the coordinates easily. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Pinduoduo proposal feedback
Hi, I see that you’re an active member of the Retailing WikiProject and I was wondering if you might be willing to have a look at a proposal I just submitted to fix issues with the article for Pinduoduo. (I have a COI as an employee of Pinduoduo’s sister company Temu and am trying to adhere strictly to the rules, which is why I’ve made a proposal instead of editing the page myself.) As you might know, Pinduoduo is China’s biggest e-commerce company for agricultural produce, so I hope that you might find the subject matter intriguing given your interest in Retail. Thanks very much for your time! Snowy2000 (talk) 17:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Gravel Hill tram stop for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gravel Hill tram stop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gravel Hill tram stop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — MATRIX! (a good person!)&#91;citation unneeded&#93; 17:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)