User talk:Qwyrxian/Archive 56

So who's the puppet master?
has been here since the 12th. only created today, but posts to a talk page manually signing as Aabrucadubraa.. Then there's, posting only to insult. That IP gelocates near the IP claiming to be Santilli.. I've added them to Sockpuppet investigations/Zkurko. Dougweller (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Hey Dougweller, I have no information about what this investigation is, but in general context I would suggest you get a life of your own rather than researching and investigating what others are editing and creating, unless they are causing some serious disruption to wikipedia. It is far more constructive to research articles and write new information than researching people's accounts. I do not intend to cause any ill feelings but this message is in some good intent alone so we could make better use of our time in a more efficient and constructive manner.

Marchoctober (talk) 09:34, 15 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Marchoctober, You clearly aren't aware of the disruption, attacks on Jews, attacks on Wikipedians, etc that are behind all this. Another Admin has blocked these accounts. Do you really think we should just ignore blatant anti-Semitic posts on talk pages (as an example of what this group of socks or meatpuppets has been doing)? Dougweller (talk) 09:41, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Dougweller is absolutely correct here, and you're completely out of line, Marchoctober. Santilli and/or his close associates have been, for several years, attempting to transform his Wikipedia article (and associated articles) into pieces supporting and promoting his scientific theory. This scientific theory has almost no support within the scientific community, his results have not been replicated outside of people directly associated with him, and he has published almost nothing on his theories in independent, peer-reviewed journals. Now, that promotion, ultimately, isn't all that bad; it's no different than a company trying to make its Wikipedia article look like a piece of advertising, and it's easily dealt with. But in addition to all of that, Santilli and/or his associates want his Wikipedia article to reflect, as fact, his claim that the only reason his theories aren't widely accepted is because there is a vast, world-wide web of Jewish scientists who want to promote Einstein and repress all dissenting voices. A number of Wikipedia editors have been accused of being part of this global conspiracy. And that is absolutely unacceptable and needs to stop as soon as possible and as often as needed, because we're not going to be the mouthpiece for anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. So Dougweller and any other editor who thinks that they can help in this matter is welcome and encouraged to do so.
 * But even your underlying critique is flawed. Wikipedia needs people of many different types working on it. I, for example, don't do very much article expansion. I have at times in the past, but since I don't have access to a lot of sources and I don't have a lot of time to commit to extended research, I now spend far more time editing existing articles, removing non-neutral poorly sourced junk, and dealing with administrative matters. If you want to work on building and creating new articles (or expanding existing ones) then that's absolutely great--we need content creators, we need content editors, we need administrators, we need policy-wonks, etc. If all of us gave up administrative tasks and focused solely on expanding articles, half of the encyclopedia would collapse in days, as articles were overrun with vandals and POV-pushers, constantly warring with other POV-pushers. Part of the "cost" of having Wikipedia open to anyone who wants to edit it is that we have to take a lot of effort to deal with edits made with improper intentions. So Dougweller, and I, are using our Wikipedia time in "efficient and constructive manner[s]", to use your phrase. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Greatly appreciate the efforts taken to explain all the above so patiently in detail, I will agree with you based on the above explanation.Marchoctober (talk) 12:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan
There has been an effort again by User:Joshua Jonathan to show the personality in less light, please see here., I haveundone him. Especially because this particular information is sourced and also been on this wiki page from ages. Please see the talk page also where he explained doing so to show the personality in a more down to earth manner. Also for some reason removed multiple links, not mentioning anything why he did so either on talk page or in description of is edit. Marchoctober (talk) 08:38, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Enough!!! This has been thoroughly explained and discussed at the Talk Page, in a discussion between User:Abecedare and me. Marchoctober has had plent of opportunity to participate, which he did not do. His one source only calls Radhakrishnan a "great scholar", and does not support the rest of the sentence. And my change was also sourced. The links were removed because I'd copied part of the lead to the Talk Page, to write a proposal for a change in the lead. I hadn't noticed it was without links, yet this no good reason to revert. They can be re-inserted quite easily, can't they?
 * By the way, are you a reincarnation of User:Padmalakshmisx? Last edit at Cinema of Andhra Pradesh by User:Wheelwat at 8 november 2012, while User:Kondakotaiah starts at 9 november 2012, with the same interest in the Cinema of Andhra Pradesh.
 * Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   08:52, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I only have time at the moment to comment on the last point: No, this isn't (I think) Padmalakshmisx. Marchoctober has stated directly that he is User:RTPking, using a new account because he forget the password to the old one. That's of course completely acceptable, as long as the accounts are publicly linked, as they are on Marchoctober's user page. And it was confirmed at Padmalakshmisx's SPI that RTPking/Marchoctober is not even in the same country. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay. Thanks for replying.  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   14:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I am participating on the Talk page, it is false that the source i provided does not mention all that information, I have added the info again to the article and provided the same source with precise searching done so you do not get lost in the searching, and claim that the source is bad, please see talk page for source. Marchoctober (talk) 01:35, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * User:Qwyrxian, requesting your intervention on talk, under Lead continued section.Marchoctober (talk) 07:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Panadura's box is open again
Thought you might like to know:



Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)


 * User:MOttaCossaOb is a sock puppet of User:Masu7 who was blocked indefinitely for persistent sock puppetry. Could one of you block User:MOttaCossaOb (I did try ANI but got no response)? Could you also protect Royal College Panadura, Royal vs St. John's, St. John's College Panadura, Panadura Royal College, Category:Panadura Royal College and Category:Royal College Panadura so that Masu7 can't edit them using another sock?-- obi2canibe talk contr 13:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello
Dear Administrator, kindly arrange to redirect the List of cities in Armenia to this page: List of cities and towns in Armenia. It is currently redirecting to List of municipalities of Armenia. Thanks.--Zyzzzzzy (talk) 07:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Would you please let this page List of cities in Nagorno-Karabakh redirect to List of cities and towns in Nagorno-Karabakh. It is currently redirecting to Nagorno-Karabakh. Thanks.--Zyzzzzzy (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

FYI
Hi Qwirxian. I see another round of nerving edit-conflicts coming up. The editor in question has been active using the following accounts (as far as I can see): Typical for his style of editing is: I've shared my concerns before with an editor I highly appreciate. I'm sorry to "denounce" (is that the correct word?) again, and if necessary I'll give additional diffs, but I'm really fed up with this guy, so I thought it might be good to let you know. Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   21:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 81.106.127.14 (10 nov 2011 - present)
 * 81.107.150.246 (11 nov 2010 - 2 oct 2011)
 * Langdell (4 april 2010 (one edit))
 * 81.109.10.218 (4 feb 2009 - 23 nov 2009)
 * 81.106.115.153 (25 nov 2009 - 6 july 2010)
 * 81.109.11.33 (2 july 2008 user-account Langdell and IP - 1 jan 2009)
 * Langdell (7 aug 2005 - 21 oct 2008 / 4 april 2010 (one edit))
 * the range of topics (eastern spirituality, for example Radhakrishnan (diff diff diff diff ), Dharma (previous accusation) and Brahman);
 * the perennialist view he tries to push, based on his own observations;
 * the rewriting of leads (and the subsequent reversions by others);
 * persistent original research (Arhat (Buddhism): OR response discussion)(Buddha-nature: OR response);
 * the persistent use of the "oxford Encyclopdia of world Religions" as his main source diff;
 * the agressive and arrogant attitude toward other editors, see Dharma, Spirituality, Zen and Mahayana.
 * Typical is also the repeated reference to "as a published author in the field", "As the editor of a recent book on Buddhism", etc diff.

Talkback
Hari7478 (talk) 22:32, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Khatri and RS
I've just disagreed with you at Talk:Khatri and edited the article accordingly ... before realising that you had responded to prior concerns about the sourcing. I'm not going to revert myself right now but I've gone all year without being wrong once and so I'm due an error ... Going to the dentist - tongue is stuck in my cheek. - Sitush (talk) 11:19, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Vellalar
Hello Qwyrxian, Please take a look at Sitush's talk page. I request yourself and Sitush to handle issues with Vellalar article, wherein the problem is between Rajkris and me. I was hoping Sitush wud rewrite three articles, Vellalars, Velirs and intro section of Kshatriya factually. However, Sitush has a medical procedure in the offing. So I decided to work with those articles. Now Rajkris has gone and deleted my input (all properly referenced content). What do I do now? --Mayasutra &#91;&#61; No &#124;&#124;&#124; Illusion &#61;&#93; (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Mayasutra
 * Please take a look at Rajkris's talk page. The problem is with 2 articles, Vellalars and Velirs. --Mayasutra &#91;&#61; No &#124;&#124;&#124; Illusion &#61;&#93; (talk) 21:55, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Maysasutra
 * I'm looking into this, one article at a time. The issues appear to be connected. - Sitush (talk) 11:21, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho


Dougweller (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.

Dougweller (talk) 09:20, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Khatri article
Hello, Qwyrxian,

I have newly joined Wikipedia and looking forward to contribute positively to it.

I request you to give comments on khatri talk page. [Sitush] has also asked you to look at the discussion thread.

Please look into it, as i am very much into this article and really want to improve it. Once i am done with this, then i may move on and work on other articles as well. Thank you. Satya301 (talk) 07:59, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Afro-Latin American
I have started a discussion at Talk:Afro-Latin American about whether to use a social or genetic-based interpretation for the population figures. As you have edited these figures in the past I'm letting you know in case you have something to add. Tobus (talk) 09:47, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/RFC on medical disclaimer
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/RFC on medical disclaimer. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Absence
Apologies to all, but for personal reasons, I'm going to be on an extended break from Wikipedia. I almost certainly won't be able to respond to any queries; other administrators are welcome to reverse administrative actions I've taken without consulting me. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Msoamu is back, restoring deleted pages
Hey man, not sure if you remember this guy but Msoamu is back. He's already restored at least two articles which were deleted during his topic ban, including an organization for which his screen name seems to be a conflict of interest. During his topic ban, he did not edit anything nor did he seek any mentors; he has displayed no change of heart or increased understanding of policies (his recreation of deleted articles already seems like a big problem). I just wanted to ask your advice before I interact with him. The recreated articles are obviously an issue to be dealt with, but given his history do you think something can be said to him now as a preventative measure against further POV pushing (given that about half a dozen people commented on his POV becoming a competence problem)? MezzoMezzo (talk) 12:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Doesn't the creation of these articles on the 21st break his topic ban which seems to have ended on the 24th . I've found copyvio in one article. Dougweller (talk) 16:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * And most of Muslim Students Organization of India MSO was copied from the sources. There is probably more but I have stuff to do that is less mind-numbing. Dougweller (talk) 17:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * User:Dougweller, that's the recreated page; I already nominated it for speedy per the criteria (it was deleted via AfD). I was going to wait for more feedback, but Msoamu's edits are continuing today in the same disruptive fashion; there already seems to be problems with how some redirect pages are working. I'd rather jump in now, in the past he had caused quite a bit of damage before being stopped. MezzoMezzo (talk) 18:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Back to AN or ANI I guess, wherever the ban was first made. Dougweller (talk) 19:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It was at ANI, man this sucks. I just spent the past hour sifting through sources on another article he created, about half don't confirm the stuff he's writing at all (Qwrxian might remember that behavior from Msoamu's sockpuppet account Shabiha). I guess it has come back to that, but at this point I might wait until tomorrow or after to file an ANI report. I literally have an actual real life headache now, I think it's from this but who knows. MezzoMezzo (talk) 19:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Aaaand...I just had to remove another copyright violation. That's maybe four in the past hour. I'm logging off. Good night moon. MezzoMezzo (talk) 19:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It was outside his topic ban, so that's ok. Apologies to Qwyrxian for posting here while he's got problems. Dougweller (talk) 10:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Help
Whenever you are free, can you guide me in following aspect? -Rayabhari (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * User: Kswarrior has posted a warning in my talk page accusing me of disruptive edits to Aam Admi Party article, where I shortened some of his edits. The user boasts of 70+ edits in his user page. He also boasts of so many things in his user page. I am surprised by his rude warning. Kindly advise me if you are free.
 * I strongly hope you will continue to contribute.

Please comment on Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! A gift from fellow Wikipedians.
You have been selected to receive a merchandise giveaway. We last contacted you on 2/10/2014. Please send us a message if you would like to claim your shirt. --JMatthews (WMF) (talk) 07:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Henna
Hi Qwyrxian. I noticed that you commenting out use(s) of the deleted file File:HennaUsageMap.jpg on Henna, which the blocked User:Janellwashere had originally uploaded. Can you confirm whether File:Henna 2014-02-22 04-37.jpg is the same file? It was also appended to the infobox. I vaguely remember File:HennaUsageMap.jpg looking similar. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Allahabad
Hey there. Would you mind leaving your suggestion for Allahabad. What improvements I should make to make it GA ? Any help will be appreciated.-- 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 18:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Your input is requested for consensus
Please comment over at Draft talk:Abby Martin. Viriditas (talk) 02:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * , Qwyrxian is not active on Wikipedia. They may return but emails between myself and them suggest that it is unlikely. A great loss to the project, imo, but there was a pretty serious situation arising due to their participation. - Sitush (talk) 02:20, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for letting me know. I was contacting everyone who participated in the last AfD. Viriditas (talk) 02:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions 2013 review: Draft v3
Hi. You have commented on Draft v1 or v2 in the Arbitration Committee's 2013 review of the discretionary sanctions system. I thought you'd like to know Draft v3 has now been posted to the main review page. You are very welcome to comment on it on the review talk page. Regards, AGK  [•] 00:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

The Como Brothers Band Deletion
Dear Qwyrxian,

I do not understand why The Como Brothers Band Wikipedia page was deleted. I contested the deletion and it appears no one even looked at my objections. I request this page be restored. Read through the page and you will see that all information being relayed can be verified by third party persons. All facts written are referenced and sources are clearly outlined. All material is objective and unbiased. This page was not created for the promotion/advertisement of any person, place or product. It is simply ridiculous that I have no one to contact in matters regarding the deletion of the page. The Wikipedia page is needed to clarify information regarding the nature of the band, history, and its verified web sources. The band needs a source to relay which information is accurate as there have been several discrepancies. The Como Brothers Band has an imdb http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6398859/

It has multiple reviews of their albums and performances from outside parties. To name a few:
 * Brian Lion of Under The Gun Review has praised the album, stating, "Pretty much the whole of Baby Steps is catchy as hell".
 * Brian Weidy of IX Daily’s reviewed the album, writing, "The Como Brothers Band excels on their debut".
 * Joshua Smotherman of Middle Tennessee Music writes, “Baby Steps includes track after track of grade A++ quality songwriting, musicianship, and originality”
 * James Wilson of My Random Jukebox speaks of Matt and Andrew’s songwriting abilities, stating, “How the music is put together alongside the catchy lyrics is a credit to their songwriting ability (which I think is their biggest talent)”.
 * I Am Entertainment Magazine wrote, “It’s just a matter of time before these guys explode into the mainstream”.

Please help me to resolve this problem. If you can point me to a contact that is capable of recovering deleted page let me know. Thank you. Marissa Smith Bco66209 (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Content removed from Lingua franca
Circa July 2010, you removed a large amount content from Lingua franca. Because it's a low-traffic article, there was no feedback to your comments on the talk page at the time. Looking over what was removed, there appears to be a lot of useful and accurate information in that removed content, although unsourced. I don't have the time at the moment to work through it, let alone wade through the talk archives to reconstruct the reasons for its removal, but perhaps it's worth reconsidering some of that removed content. I've added a blurb on the talk page about if you want revisit it.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  19:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Article on Raashid Alvi
You wrestled with a thorny editor over Khalid Alvi almost exactly a year ago. He finally left you and it alone. Well, he's back at it: the article on Raashid Alvi keeps getting reverted by him without edit summary or discussion. I did not realize that there was such a long history of this behavior-- it looks like dispute resolution is coming up. Thouht you might appreciate the heads-up! That is all. KDS 4444 Talk  04:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

AN
I've mentioned you at AN: borrowed your user talk formatting and Bucketsofg's userpage, creating the impresion that they were an admin instead of a user of five days' standing.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

The Prisoner
Good day, from what I've seen on the history page of The Prisoner you have made some small, but decent contributions to it in the past, which led me to conclude that perhaps you might be interested in helping me improve the article and articles related to it (schedule). I have also suggested creating a taskforce in order to achieve this goal (if you have an opinion on this, I'd love to hear it, proposal page), and would value your opinion. Cheers.-- Music 26/  11  19:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

No Answer to Warning
I will summarize my problems. If you want evidence, then I will put it on a noticeboard, because you can find it here. Please answer on my talk page. It iz faster that way, because I do not need to poll your page, or even know that you are awake. If I do poll your page, and I am on a different IP#, then I can look closely at colours. Also, I get one piece of spam every three months or so, and it's not because of filters. [mailto:brewjay@spamcop.net Bohgosity BumaskiL] 75.152.119.10 (talk) 12:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) He voted in an offensive manner without a reason.
 * 2) He insisted on being offensive with a reversion.
 * 3) He deleted my first warning from hiz old messajez.
 * 4) One of his friends insisted on hiz offense with a reversion.
 * 5) He referred me to a guideline that does not tell me to do anything differently from what I did.
 * 6) He seems to think that deleting warnings is a good idea.
 * 7) He did not answer my warnings.

Please delete that last message. It was from me, and I do not care to press charges.
173.183.252.142 (talk) 04:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta
Tito ☸ Dutta 13:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protect article
Hi, Could you please semi-protect Bharatiya Janata Party article indefinitely because this particular "political party" is in power and their is chance of vandalism by IP puppets. Moreover, it would be very difficult to monitor each time if small changes are made by IPs.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 05:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Qwryxian is not around at the moment. You need to submit your request at WP:RFPP. - Sitush (talk) 05:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

RfC United States same-sex marriage map
I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas: RfC: How should we color Kansas? Prcc27 (talk) 12:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 22:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Removal of permissions due to inactivity
Hi Qwyrxian, I've now desysopped you due to your recent inactivity. Thank you very much for your years of service. Worm TT( talk ) 08:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)


 * there goes another due to off-wiki harassment. I'm probably not long off following: this is an increasingly nasty place and the bigger its profile, the more the real lives of good people are damaged. - Sitush (talk) 09:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
 * That is a shame. I've bumped into Qwyrxian a number of times and did think it was a great pity he's gone. I hadn't realised there was any off-wiki harassment involved. Worm TT( talk ) 09:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I am feeling very sad here. I have also faced off-wiki harassments, and I know where the shoe hurts . A couple of months ago I started a thread on WP:AN where I talked on real-life protection and safety issues of Wikipedians. I do not know whether you'll read this or not, I wanted to send you an email too, but currently I am participating in something on this Wiki, for which I need to restrict my off-wiki communications. I'll try after a week. The relationship between you and me have been a fabulous one so far. I admired your works too. I sincerely hope you'll read this message and come back, sooner or later, when you'll feel comfortable. Prayers and good wishes for you. Yours sincerely Tito ☸ Dutta 12:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

question
Can you please unlock the haunting hour episode list? I noticed major typo's and the account I used has been banned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.60.230 (talk) 02:42, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year Qwyrxian!


Happy New Year! Qwyrxian, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Levdr1 lp /  talk  04:31, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to user talk pages.

Your deletion of Rosetta Code
Back in 2012 you nominated the Rosetta Code article that I wrote for deletion - see Articles for deletion/Rosetta Code - as apparently not notable enough and managed to convince others to vote accordingly. I have no problem with that and I purposefully withdrawn from voting or commenting as I was obviously convinced about the importance of this subject if I took the time to write the article in the first place. Your nomination resulted in the removal of the article with all my contributions. Then, two years later the subject must have become suddenly notable and the article was created once again but without any sign of my original contributions. I actually forgot about all this but recently a friend was telling me about Rosetta Code showing the Wikipedia article and I smiled that I was actually the one who originally wrote it - only to be told that I am not telling the truth as there is not even a single contribution made by me. If you think that the subject is not notable (yet) then I'm fine that you take steps to have it deleted. But if it becomes notable later then why do you waste the original work that was put into writing the first version of the article? Because you are the one who originally nominated it for deletion and voiced the strongest opinions that resulted in the subsequent deletion, I am now asking you to help in fixing the result of all that mess. Please tell me how my original contributions can be restored and how the edit history can be fixed. Thank you. —Rafał Pocztarski, Rfl (talk | contribs) 09:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Qwyrxian is no longer editing Wikipedia due to personal commitments. - Sitush (talk) 10:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)