User talk:ReaderofthePack/Archive 8

Regarding secondary sources
In response to your critique of the page Oxford University Biochemical Society, and issues of notability. The listing from the Chemical society has been removed, however there are multiple third party confirmations that the society has held notable lectures. Sure, the fact that the people involved were famous had some affiliation does not confer notability, however the lectures themselves were notable and important events within the scientific community. Some, as noted below, led to extremely high-impact publications (Nature is, according to ISI Web of Science, the world's highest-impact science journal) Here are a few third-party reliable sources mentioning these lectures: http://www.firstauthor.org/oxford.html - First Author, gives details of a notable lecture by Sir Martin Wood, founder of Oxford instruments. The account of this lecture is published here: http://www.firstauthor.org/Downloads/wood.pdf

http://www.britishbiophysics.org.uk/ - The British Biophysical Society gives mention to the last Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, Brian Kobilka, giving 'lecture of the year' for the OUBS. This is also covered in their winter society newsletter here: http://www.britishbiophysics.org.uk/data/uploads/newsletters/bbs_news_winter_2012.pdf

http://www.rsc.org/ConferencesAndEvents/conference/alldetails.cfm?evid=108362 - The Royal Chemical Society providing event details for the talk by Prof. Adrian Mulholland

as well as hosting lectures that later gave rise to publications, such as: "Metabolic Adaptation in the Brain", published in Nature, by Henry McIlwain. "This article is based on lectures given in October 1969 to the Oxford University Biochemical Society and to the Neurochemical Group of the Biochemical Society." Nature 226, 803 - 806 (30 May 1970); doi:10.1038/226803a0

that should fit the requirement for multiple third-party sources?

Just thought you should know
...that the editor you nominated for a T-shirt has just been awarded the Editor of the Week Award. I'm sure he would like to hear from you. ```Buster Seven   Talk  02:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Frank Cianciulli
For some reason, your AfD of Frank Cianciulli went wrong. There is no AfD-page yet! The Banner talk 16:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Speirosmusic
Thorough the link he provided, the user appears to be one Speiros Esteropoulos. His userpage was set to parade as a self-promotional WP:FAKEARTICLE. As neither Speiros Esteropoulos nor his company Speirosmusic have notability enough to merit an article, the topic did not merit being moved to article space nor a user subpage as a draft. So the speedy of the inappropriate user page was correct. Following upon that, a blocking of the user per WP:PRODNAME would be also. Username "Speirosmusic" is a violation of username policy. Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 16:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Can I block him or should you? Since I've sort of had a back and forth with him I don't know if it'd be entirely appropriate. I don't want him to say that I'm doing it only to be "mean" and it would be sort of a CYA move if someone uninvolved did it. BTW, have I told you I love you lately? Because I was afraid that I was just being a witch to him and I'm glad to see that I'm not unfounded in my concerns over his userpage and rationale on his talk page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   16:09, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * In consideration of WP:BITE... before either of us block him, and as you know the history behind his situation better than do I and have been involved in discussions with him, be sure to educate him under WP:BADNAME. We have a newbie whose username is problematic but was not "obviously" created in bad faith. Best to politely draw the user's attention to username policy and encourage them to create a new account with a different username. If you want, you can use the or template for this. And by sending him to WP:PRIMER, we might turn his attention to creating and sourcing appropriate content.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 16:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * It looks like another user has blocked him for the username, but my big issue is that I've sort of tried to direct him to explanations as to why the original userpage was considered promotional and tried to explain that only coming on to Wikipedia to create a userpage entry about yourself isn't really considered to be helpful. He doesn't really seem to be too interested in editing about anything else, as his only arguments have been as to why he should be able to have his userpage restored or recreated. If you want to take a crack at it, go ahead- I think at this point he's going to be fairly resistant to anything that I say to him. I've tried to explain twice that pages like AC/DC are here because they have established notability, but it's not really going anywhere. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   18:26, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Soldier Front 2
I blanked the page by accident. It was a bad keystroke on my part and I apologize. Sprinkler21 (talk) 05:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Sprinkler21
 * Eh, it happens. I saw your previous edits afterwards and saw that this wasn't really your typical style, so I figured it was an accident. No real harm done and all. It's not like the time I tried adding something to one of the AfD project lists and accidentally deleted about 2-3 other articles off the list... Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:51, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Opps! :) Sprinkler21 (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Sprinkler21

Delete request of User:100loves
Can you please delete User:100loves (all with talk page and contributions), because the user is useless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.176.19 (talk) 06:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No. That's not how Wikipedia works. As far as I can see, 100loves seems to be doing some pretty useful work to Wikipedia. If you have an issue with any of this user's edits, the best place to start is to discuss it with the editor in question on their talk page. If you're angry that they have reverted things you have done, then you should discuss it on the article's talk page. I can't delete or block a user because you disagree with them. The only time I can do such things is if they've done something that is overwhelmingly bad rule-wise and they've ignored multiple requests to stop. 100loves doesn't seem to have done anything along these lines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Deleted Page
Category:Page Deleted Hi, I'm very new to this and was wondering why my page "Amyra Dastur" was deleted?(With all due respect)Is it possible to brought back and what changes to be made to survival of page(please give me suggestions) thanks.

Renaldo Fischer
The importance was indicated by the fact that at least one of his books had been published, not only in the United States, but also in Autralia, Japan and Italy. In particular, it has been very popular in Italy for a major publisher. However, I had indicated verifiable references to Google Books. Can you restore the page and leave discussion about it better? --Spinoziano (talk) 11:51, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * As far as I could see, the books looked to be self-published through iUniverse for the most part. I'll restore it and run it through AfD if it'd make you feel better, but it's pretty much a given at this point that it'd be deleted unless someone can pull a pretty big rabbit out of their hat. Just publishing something though anyone, mainstream or self-published, or anywhere, US or overseas, doesn't give notability on that basis alone. You need coverage of the author and/or his works in non-primary, non-trivial sources. None of the sources on your article established notability in the slightest. One was an obituary, which are pretty much universally considered to be non-usable as a reliable source since they're written by someone involved with the deceased. The only exception for this is if it's a death notice written up in a big newspaper, such as the LA Times. The other links were to Google Books, which would be considered a primary source at best. A search brings up absolutely nothing that can be used as a reliable source. But like I said, I'll restore it and run it through AfD, but I think it's sort of a futile effort. He just doesn't pass notability guidelines in any format and I can pretty much promise it'll end in deletion again unless someone finds some miracle sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   14:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Ah.. so you are an admin
Didn't see that; I was just going to report it. Was browsing my watchlist and noticed it. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:03, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep! A brand shiny new one- I've sort of taken to going through the speedies, so I guess I should expect a lot more vandalism. If this keeps up then I might need to get one of those vandalism counters, lol. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   15:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I want to be an admin to work on the backlogs like FTCG. I've been trying to deal with other backlogs for the time being and clean up pages. The mop means janitorial work for me. Its what I find most enjoyable on Wiki. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I thought you already were one. 0.o Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   15:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Mmm nope. I need to find a mentor and stuff before I bother putting it up the RFA anyways. Maybe in a few months; I got plenty of tasks to keep me busy while I get some much needed schooling in that dept. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm so new and green at admining that I wouldn't be of much help. I'd recommend User:Yunshui if he's available for it. He's sort of my go-to guy, although I'm sure I bug the snot out of him sometimes. User:DGG and User:Schmidt are both great as far as adminly duties go as well. If you do a RFA I'll vouch for you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   17:42, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I'll bug someone eventually. I got a lot of little side things to take care of before going down the path for adminship. I'll be an interesting case because I don't want blocking tools or anything... but they come with the job. I'm a wikignome; so I don't plant firm roots on any article I touch. I'm the scattered sort of person that has no use for the tools other than cleaning up messes and hoping I don't step on too many toes to clean the thousands of tags filling Wikipedia up. Content disputes are rare for me; I need more experience in it I thinkChrisGualtieri (talk) 23:56, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Request to un-delete SiteScout article
Hi, the article for SiteScout was recently deleted -- they are a significant company in the real-time bidding space and have been covered in numerous reliable sources as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SoWhy/Common_A7_mistakes#Common_indications_of_importance_or_significance (Google News: http://www.google.com/news?q=sitescout ) -- What is the process for requesting an 'un-delete' of the article? Or should we just re-submit a new one with more information?

(Disclaimer: I'm an employee of said company, don't know if that's relevant or not) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankind (talk • contribs) 18:26, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The big problem was that the article looked to be sourced by things that can't show notability, such as press releases. I do think that the article needs more work, but I'm willing to transfer a copy into your userspace. I'll post the link on your userpage. Now I will warn you that having a COI can be a huge issue and I'd really recommend that you get someone to look over the article before posting it to the mainspace. The other problem was that the page did come across a little promotional, enough to where someone tagged it as such. The thing is that it's really, really easy to slip into this if you're not careful and when you're involved with the company. You have a personal stake in it, so you want your company's page to represent them as best as possible. That's sort of natural, but we have to be really careful about accidental promotional speak. If you want, I'll try to help you write it out. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   18:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Awesome! Thank you so much for all your help. I'll have the article improved and double-checked by non-COI eyes before posting it to the mainspace. Dankind (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Requesting if you could please provide feedback on the current article draft I have up at User:Dankind/SiteScout Dankind (talk) 15:56, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

good job
cleaning up some of my speedies (I was going through older unpatrolled articles last night, and it does seem I should have checked a little more carefully.) This is why I try not to fall into the temptation to do things single-handed, but instead to rely on my colleagues to check my work.  DGG ( talk ) 23:16, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks! That's the same reason I try not to speedy things that I tag. It's better to have someone check than to not. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Domenic Johansson custody case
Thanks for the talk page note. I have added another reference - it might be helpful if you add it (with an assessment) to the source section on the deletion page - otherwise your numbering might confuse. StAnselm (talk) 03:48, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I added it, but the problem is that the Daily Mail is pretty much considered to be a tabloid along the lines of the National Enquirer as far as Wikipedia goes. It's generally not considered to be a usable source in any context, not even when they're doing things such as book reviews and the like. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
SpecMode (talk) 07:39, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Afdesta online festival has been deleted
Hi, I found out that you have marked my article about Afdesta Online festival as a promotion or advertisement article. However, I don't know really what was the main problems, Didn't have enough time to edit it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afdesta_Online_Festival

The festival is new and just about one 2 years old. So you may not find a lot of news about it but it's popular among artists (Photographers, Cartoonist and etc.). As you can that see, The most leading international juries are participated as jury in seasonal festivals.

Please undelete my article and let me know which part should be changed ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irreporter (talk • contribs) 08:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll transfer it into your userspace and highlight what needs to be changed. The biggest issue is that the article has zero sources that could show notability. You must and I repeat must have coverage in reliable sources in order to show notability. Reliable sources consist of coverage in newspapers, news shows, reliable websites, and the like. Notifications of events or non-notable blog entries don't contribute towards notability, nor do any sources released by the AOF itself, even if they're published in other locations. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

I want
The reason of copying and pasting of this wiki www.detectiveconanworld.com/wiki that its style in introducing wiki is very goo so i wanted to copy it and translate it into Arabic for Arab Detective Conan fans that's it and i hope you help me in creating my own wiki --Semo4499 (talk) 11:36, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The problem is that even if you like that wiki's style, that's not how Wikipedia is done. If you want to create your own wiki that's fine, but you'll have to do it through another site such as Wikia or the like. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   11:40, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Experienced Enough to Consider my Case Yet?
Hi Tokyogirl. I once asked you to consider my unblock case, but you felt you were too new an admin. Okay, how about now? It's a long story but I was no-warn, no-discussion blocked for sockpuppetry by Timotheus Canens. I tell you this with absolute focus: whatever in my edit history you may find to fairly criticize me on, you will never find an instance of socking. Oh I have done IP edits like this one, clearly identifying my account, but that is not "sock." "Sock" requires a deceptive element, and neither namecallers nor policy twisters can redefine the English language. Block evader, yes; sock, no. Nihonjoe saw my side and unblocked me a couple months ago (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Colton_Cosmic&oldid=561843569#User_unblocked) but one of my, sorry this is really how I see it by now, hater fanboys kicked it over to WP:ANI after about ten minutes. WP:AN/ANI call themselves "the community" but those are essentially chat forums populated largely by a self-selecting crowd of blockaholics, not representative of Wikipedians in general. The outcome was predetermined, they enjoyed it so much, they had to do it twice, I'm reblocked. Well, I don't want this to get too long, but I feel WP:AN/ANI exerting supremacy over Nihonjoe's unblock is illegitimate and not found anywhere in policy. A blocked editor should be able to get a fair calm hearing from an uninvolved administrator or two, and that is policy. If you'll consider it I'd love to answer your questions. I'm currently stealth-blocked from my talkpage and email (i.e. blocked without public notification of reason on the talkpage) but I'd suppose you could lift that. You might be able to email me, I don't know if the email block goes both ways. Certainly I promise to WP:CIV. Now, fair warning, if you treat my case favorably be aware that some of my haters are going to become your haters, and that was Nihonjoe's experience with Beeblebrox. Here's the link to the last version of my talkpage that contains my side of things (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Colton_Cosmic&oldid=561843569#Responding_to_the_current_WP:AN_discussion_on_me.2C_Phase_3). Regards, and this is Colton Cosmic. PS: Still haven't got around to watching that horror DVD yet.
 * I'm going to have to politely decline- I've blocked people, but I haven't actually unblocked anyone at this point in time. This is a fairly complicated case and at this point I still don't feel confident enough to really intervene in this instance. I think it'd be better to ask someone with more seniority and experience in admin-ing, as right now I'm still way too green to make any sort of absolute decision in this instance. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   12:22, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If it makes you feel any better, I do admire that you're trying so hard to get your account back. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   12:22, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I enjoyed editing Wikipedia for years without warning, block, ban or sanction. Switched to a new account because of privacy concerns. Tried to defend a BLP (Phoenix Jones) and was introduced for the first time to this strange new world of WP:AN/ANI and professional blockers, which my years of non-administrative content editing hadn't equipped me to handle. I don't fault you for turning me down, but it's not that easy just to find someone with seniority and experience. Nihonjoe did, but then the blockaholics mobbed me. I guess I could just start a new account under different name, I'm technically adept enough to do so without detection, but it would be "giving truth to the lie" really, as my objection throughout this has been "no I don't sock." This is Colton Cosmic.
 * Just a review of the situation says TokyoGirl should not and must not consider unblocking you. You have been referred to the proper channels of BASC & UTRS. Block evasion is a bad thing, admin shopping is also bad. I don't know the details, but the concerns are big enough that many high-profile users are aware of the situation and have tried to guide you along. It may seem harsh, but you should do as instructed.ChrisGualtieri (talk) 13:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Raymond Russell Writer/sandbox
Hello Tokyogirl79. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Raymond Russell Writer/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is not in article space, Ax criteria are invalid. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:24, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Biocultural Landscapes & Seascapes (BCLS)
Dear Tokyogirl79. You just deleted my contribution on wikipedia on the reason of copyright infringement from https://plus.google.com/107478410160659334381/about. However I am the owner of https://plus.google.com/107478410160659334381/about and https://sites.google.com/site/bclsbiocultural/. To avoid any source of problem I decided to delete the original conflicting text from https://plus.google.com/107478410160659334381/about and from https://sites.google.com/site/bclsbiocultural/. Hope this clarifies the problem and will avoid any unfortunate deletion. Thanks in advance. jb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbpichancourt (talk • contribs) 00:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Er, thanks
Thanks for deleting my userpage. Why was it created? Who created it? Gosh, I can't believe I miss out on so much stuff. --70.181.68.226 (talk) 04:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Doug Walker
Hello, I believe it is necessary that Doug Walker should have his own page. Firstly this page would show the more personal aspects of Walkers life and carrier, plus this would better distinguish Doug Walker, the person, as apposed to one of his characters. Also, along with his influences and personal preferences, this page could show Doug Walker in his other endeavors as an actor, director, ect., outside of his site. With the mandatory procedures and edits to the page, it could eventually turn out to be a useful page for the inquisitive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lenzviewco (talk • contribs) 06:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The problem is that we don't have a lot that discusses him individually from the site he's related to. The sources on the page do not give him individual notability. Apart from the ones that mention the site, the remaining links are IMDb (which isn't usable) and things such as marriage announcements, which can't be used to show notability. MySpace and YouTube are also unusable as sources. As far as WP:ITSUSEFUL goes, that's not a reason for a page. We don't keep pages because they're useful. We keep them because they pass notability guidelines. He's notable for the site, which already has an article so he's a redirect. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:32, 1 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, but individuals like Jenna Marbles and James Rolfe have articles of their own and do not have much notability outside of the internet. Why is this?
 * The issue here isn't whether their notability is non-internet related, but whether or not they have coverage that focuses on them. In the case of Marbles, she isn't known for a specific show. Now as far as Rolfe goes, it might be that he's received enough non-Angry Video Game Nerd coverage to warrant his own article, although I will say that a lot of those sources are fairly dodgy in nature and it could be argued that he doesn't merit a separate article either. The basic point to remember is that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument to make when trying to argue separate notability for something or someone. All it might mean is that the person passes notability guidelines in some format or that the person doesn't actually merit a separate article and the article should be deleted. If you want to nominate either page for deletion because you think that they don't establish enough notability, feel free to do so. However arguing that their presence means that you think that Walker should have an article is not an argument that will win your case. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:21, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Cheryl Cran
Hello The page named Cheryl Cran was deleted under section G4 of wikipedia's policies. That's because the content was already OK. It was deleted before because it lacked sufficient independent verifyable resources. I only added those resources in the external links to cover up the Notability factor. I included several independent magazines and e news which have published Cheryl Cran's work. I also included ISBNs of her published books. I don't know how else can an author/speaker be deemed acclaimed to be included in wikipedia. She is even mentioned in Wikipedia's page, Canadian Association of Professional Speakers in the Hall of Fame. Please let me know what else can I include to have Cheryl's biography up on wikipedia. Thanks.

Naveen.s1987 ¬¬¬¬
 * Hmm... the big part of the issue was that you didn't have any sources that showed notability. I'll go into more detail on your talk page, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   12:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Deleting my article "Greengate (company) yesterday
Hi, You deleted my article "Greengate (company) yesterday because of - No indication of importance - Unambiguous advertising or promotion

I have tried to correct (improve) it (see below). Can you please check it again? Thanks.

GreenGate company is the first professional translation agency in Pakistan founded in 2007. Offering translation (along with proofreading, revision and layout), interpretation, website and software localization, dubbing and subtitling services. The total number of translated words (as for June 1 2013) is more than 5 mln. The number of staff is more than 2000 (freelance). The number of regular clients is more than 100. Languages - 53 different languages and dialects, which covers the world’s main languages including main European languages (English, German, Spanish, French, Russian, Ukrainian, Italian, Portuguese, Turkish, Dutch, Polish, Bulgarian, Greek, Euskadi, Swedish, Finnish, Norwegian and others), all popular East Asian, South Asian and Central Asian languages (Arabic, Hindi, Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Farsi, Dari and many others) and all Pakistani languages (Urdu, Punjabi, Pashto, Sindhi, Balochi, Saraiki, Hindko). The fields of translation are industry and technology, communication, economics, politics, law, management, medicine, pharmacology, IT, tourism etc. CAT-tools are Trados, Déjà vu etc. GreenGate participated in the following projects – Oil and Gas Platform (Norway), Aeronautical Engineering (Algeria), Arbitration Office work (Singapore) etc. Social activities arrangement (such as “The Letter to a Coeval”). GreenGate is a founder of “The World Without Borders” contest.GS spb (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It still reads pretty promotional, as it looks like something you'd put on a flier to get people to try your services. I'll see what I can do as far as cleaning it up, though. I can't do it right now but I'll try when I get back on later tonight. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   16:39, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes, you're right, actually. Looking forward to your help. Thank you again! GS spb (talk) 08:23, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

How Can you, for no reasons ?
The page PUSA CALL should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Vichitr 12:13, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Dear Tokyogirl79 (or any administrator who is interested in this article's deletion),

I strongly contend that this page should not be deleted at all. I myself is an alumni of this Institute i.e. Institute Of Hotel Management, Pusa, New Delhi, India. Its more than 7 years that I am associated with the procedures and working of the Institute, and have seen it, in and out. No wonder that we are unable to provide any documentary support or evidence in terms of digital media(except for a youtube video, which you deny to recognize), for a sole reason mentioned in the article itself,( if you have read it, it clearly says that it is not at all official by the institute). Hence finding reliable source as per your terms is something uncalled for.

If you believe at all or want to search for more regarding the same you may always search or ask any member of the IHM, pusa community either directly or via any social networking site (Hope that will not be a difficult task for anyone who is interested in finding the trail of Pusa Call which is older than many of us, Even Internet was not born that time).

It is an appeal to any administrator interested in this page, If you go by the History of 'Pusa Call' at Wikipedia it was previously been deleted. Since than I tried searching for a proof to give a support to this article, Its quite unfortunate that we are unable to provide any new proof (as its unofficial, but super famous).

The article Pusa Call, by no means of any monetary or personal gains or interest to me or any particle group in general. I can assure you about it.

regards Vaibhav Garg (V2VG2G) Alumni IHM Pusa (2006-2009)
 * The problem is twofold: first, there are no sources out there to show that this is a notable song. Second, it is not the official song of the institution, so it shouldn't be added unless you can show that it's particularly noteworthy. Since there are no reliable sources to show that it is notable, it shouldn't merit an article or even a mention on Wikipedia. Many places have songs that their members like to sing. However, the existence of something doesn't mean that it merits an article. The article went through a deletion discussion and was deleted because despite your claims of it being famous, there are no reliable sources that confirm this. We simply cannot take word of mouth as confirmation of its notability. All articles must have reliable sources to show notability. This is one of the most basic and solid rules of notability here on Wikipedia and one that is highly unlikely to go away anytime soon. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Schulz & Forever
Hi, I noticed you deleted Schulz & Forever and just wanted to ask you if you could also close out the AfD on it as well with the result:  Articles_for_deletion/Schultz_%26_Forever. It seems the AfD is still open. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 13:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete move
I noticed that you forgot to move the talk page of an article you moved, Pippi Longstocking (1997 TV series). I would ask that you do so, and that you don't leave a redirect for the talk page either (to be consistent). Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 20:33, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

CNL Financial Group
Uh, excuse me. I just started working on the article. Please restore it so that I can continue. Clearly you didn't look for news sources as the company is VERY notable. For example this EXTENSIVE article. Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I can move it to your userspace since you seem interested in working on it. Userspaces are usually better for articles that you are working on, as people can always tag and delete pages that aren't completed or don't seem to have any established notability. The reason so many people tend to get trigger happy with people working on pages in the mainspace is because many times people will create two paragraphs and then walk away from it, never to really finish establishing notability. For future reference though, I'd recommend that you use a little more diplomacy when asking for someone to restore a page. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter to me whether you restore it to my userspace or mainspace. You are most welcome to take it to a deletion discussion if you think it isn't notable. As I provided you with a 7 or so page article from a reliable source (published this month) there is obviously a very strong case to be made for notability, so your speedy deletion was grossly improper. If I had included promotional language it could have been speedily deleted as being an advertisement. You should slow down if you are deleting articles like that one. There is no rush and it's very unpleasant for editors working diligently to improve the encyclopedia have their work erased without a chance to respond or make improvements, as I was trying to do. Thank you for restoring it. I hope you do take it to AfD as I will be interested to see how that discussion goes. Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:53, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't really feel like it needs to be taken to AfD at this point. There's no need to escalate it since it's in your userspace and you can work on it there. (User:Candleabracadabra/CNL Financial Group) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Jatt & Juliet 2
Hi this article had an AFD where a redirect was put up (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jatt_%26_Juliet_2), and you have left some remarks there, the movie has now been released and has coverage (http://www.google.co.in/#safe=off&sclient=psy-ab&q=jatt+and+juliet+2+box+office&oq=Jatt+and+juliet+2+box+offi&gs_l=hp.1.1.0l2.7954.9335.5.11248.8.4.0.4.4.0.163.634.0j4.4.0...0.0.0..1c.1.17.psy-ab.KkbesG2JZNU&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.48705608,d.bmk&fp=454708d46e718598&biw=1366&bih=635) as well as better results than the first film that has an article and where the redirect has been done to, and I do have a sense that this is not the treatment a Star Wars sequel or a Star Trek, or a Spiderman or Superman or Avenger sequel would receive if they had not yet been released. Might be a different language and scale at work here, but the rules should be the same. Injun Gone Loco (talk) 21:18, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look for sources and see what I can find. Offhand I found a few just in the first page, so I'm optimistic about this article's chances of passing WP:NFILM. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for you work on the article. Injun Gone Loco (talk) 11:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Rob B. Colton Musician
No you misunderstand I am not Robert, I was going to use the name to create his article Rob B. Colton the musician. :( 72.72.252.156 (talk) 10:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC) You can find the logo on their facebook... https://www.facebook.com/robbcoltonofficial — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobColtsFan (talk • contribs) 10:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC) Hey there again, he is notable he has been covered by major lithuanian magazines and newspapers, I am dissmenating the translatiosn now... http://pl.delfi.lt/kultura/kultura/rob-b-colton-pozytywne-reggae-z-nowej-wilejki.d?id=61311911  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobColtsFan (talk • contribs) 10:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC) ALso, he not just a musician he is distributor for record company... http://www.fmgroup.lt/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobColtsFan (talk • contribs) 10:44, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok that sounds like a plan! :) 72.72.252.156 (talk) 10:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes hello again, I have created the page and am gathering the information and citations, could you help me get the logo of his band uploaded and place the appropriate fair use license on it?

Happy Fuel Revisions with Notability Sources
Hi - thanks for the explanation on why it was deleted.

We do have credible/notable sources - this was (as indicated) to be updated today. Source(s) are: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/happy-fuel-llc-launches-company-with-new---fuel--happiness-app-208345451.htm

Do you want me to re-create?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leejae76 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I've replied to this on Leejae76's talk page. --71.199.125.210 (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Daniel Morgan Perry
Hi Tokyogirl,

I appreciate your interest in Daniel Perry. I would be interested to know what you consider to be sensationalised about the article. The article is serious and well-researched and adheres to a neutral point of view. I have reflected the balance of web content that I have been able to find on the issue. This is a major human rights story, dovetailing closely with one of the biggest political news stories of the year. In a time when any junior league baseball player, to medium-length informative article on someone who headlined on all the major news channels in the States is entirely reasonable.

What is your interest in the story? Ortho rhombic, 16:39, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * My interest? I came across it on AfD and saw that there were HUGE, HUGE issues with the page. First off, you use the Daily Mail as a source. This is not a reliable source. We can't even use it as a reliable source when it comes to book reviews, the site is considered to be that bad. Secondly, phrases such as "he's still missing" are loaded with tons of implications. It sounds like something sinister happened to him. It could be that the NSA pulled him into a room and shot him in the head... or it could be that he's in a mental institution or is otherwise striving to stay out of the public limelight. We also don't use terms such as "freaking out" in an article. It's really written up poorly in more ways than one. I could pick apart the entire article, but let me just say that the way it was written actually did more to harm any slim chances of its survival than mine did. This is ultimately one event and until we have absolute proof that this is 140% connected to Snowden, we have to assume that this is a case of a mentally disturbed man having a mental breakdown on a plane. The man has a history of mental illness, so it's not exactly like he was Ron Paul shrieking that he was poisoned and that he had information on Snowden. There's no conspiracy here, just a case of one man having a mental breakdown and the media cruelly capitalizing on it because the guy happened to scream out Snowden's name. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   16:45, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Bluntly put, you have nothing to prove that this is actually pertinent to the Snowden case. All we have is a man with a history of mental illness screaming Snowden's name. You have to prove that this is anything beyond one isolated event that has nothing to do with Snowden. Notability isn't inherited just because the guy mentioned Snowden. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   16:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your considered response. Firstly, Perry didn't sound like someone who was striving to stay out of the public limelight. Quite the opposite. He was desperate not to be forgotten. It is legitimate and entirely pertinent to say that his current whereabouts are unknown. That doesn't mean that he has been shot in the head. That doesn't even mean that something sinister has happened to him, although the crux of the matter is that he was absolutely convincedc that something sinister would happen to him. So, a challenge for you. Find me an authoritative source that gives any details on what has happened to him subsequent to his disappearance!
 * Secondly, it is disingenuous to say that you are concerned about the article's chance of survival and then vote for its deletion.
 * Thirdly, why do we have to assume anything? My version of the article is a summarisation of the main facts as presented (by and large) by reputable sources. The Daily Mail is a midmarket British newspaper with hundreds of thousands of readers daily. Yes, I agree, it is not the New Statesman or Foreign Affairs but it is not an entirely invalid source for Wikipedia.
 * Finally, your last two lines are mere speculation. Simply because there are unanswered questions does not mean that a WP article is inappropriate. Ortho rhombic, 17:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The Daily Mail hasn't been considered a reliable source for years now. The number of copies in circulation mean nothing. The National Enquirer is one of the most read tabloids in the US, yet it still isn't usable as a reliable source. As for improving the article, I normally try to do that if an article is in fairly poor shape and goes against several guidelines on Wikipedia. When it comes down to it, the article violates several parts of WP:NOT. You can argue that Perry was trying not to be forgotten, but in the end it looks like a mental breakdown on a plane. It's just as likely that he's tucked away somewhere with a load of medications, with a family member taking care of him. In situations such as these it's not uncommon for the mentally ill person themselves to take their medication, realize what they've done, and then try to keep a low profile accordingly. Saying that he's missing is jumping to conclusions. As far as we know, he's not missing. The media just doesn't find him interesting enough to report on, which usually means that they followed it up and realized that it was just a mentally ill man making a scene on a plane. If they thought that there was even the slightest possibility that he had any true knowledge of Snowden and/or that he's truly missing for whatever reason, they'd jump all over that. But they haven't. This is just one event in what looks to be a very sad case of severe mental illness. This is not an abnormal claim for people to make when they have severe mental illness. I've seen people in various locations (some of which were obviously quite well off) that claimed a lot of things. Having ties to a government agency doesn't mean that you don't have severe mental illnesses that can cause delusions. I can pretty much predict that this page will get deleted, barring some extreme media coverage. This is really no different from any of the random cases of people having mental breakdowns in public that the media covers. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   18:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


 * In the end, you can try to argue your case but this is simply not how Wikipedia articles are written or cited. I could pretty much guarantee that I could bring this page to a wide variety of editors and each one would agree with me on this. The fuller version is sensationalistic and doesn't benefit Wikipedia in the slightest. I edited the page because well, I'll be frank: it was so sensationally written that I could see someone from Perry's family coming on here and demanding that we take it down because it makes him look so bad Heck, I didn't even include all of the things that Perry said. He claimed someone had shot him with darts while they were on the plane, something that would be fairly difficult and unlikely to happen. Perry also claimed that his wife was a Chinese spy. These things combined along with his history of mental illness make him a highly unreliable person when it comes to claims. Government conspiracies and "they're out to get me" rants are highly common when it comes to mental breakdowns. Trust me on this- I work around the mentally ill of various financial brackets and ages. Rants of this nature are highly common. This one just happened to be recorded. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   18:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

NOWNESS article
Dear Tokyogirl79: You had commented awhile back on the POV of the Nowness article. I edited the NOWNESS article and other fashion articles as they relate to economics. Please would you take a look at the NOWNESS artice and give feedback on the aNowness article's talk page. Thank you. Geraldshields11 (talk) 20:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

.nyc
Here is one source. I'm at a library where search engines are basically nonfunctioning. Somehow I stumbled onto the secret code--once. This was the one source I felt would pass Wikipedia's high standards. I'm going to look for others and report back.— Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 21:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Here is another which I'm not sure meets Wikipedia's high standards. No doubt about this one. I missed it earlier. I'm reluctant to start a stub article for fear I won't include enough and it'll get deleted, but I just want some assurance that the topic can have an article, which I'm sure it can.— Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 21:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmm... The PC Mag is definitely useable, as would be the CBC News one. The Engadget would be considered to be too brief of a source and is mostly a press release, so many would probably only see this as a trivial source. I think that right now a good idea would be to work on this in your userspace for right now. The one big problem is that they've been proposing to do this for a while, so a lot of people would argue that this would be WP:CRYSTAL. If they do roll this out in a few months then it'll hopefully get coverage at that point and can be transferred back into the mainspace. I'll transfer a copy into your userspace so you can work on it there. I'll post a link on your talk page once I've done it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   02:09, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll wait on it then.— Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 17:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Now that I see it, I can't understand how it got deleted. The only real need is to have something for the NYC (disambiguation) page.— Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 17:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


 * If I remember, I think it was because the page didn't have anything on it that showed it was really notable source-wise. If you want to restore it I can do so, given the sources you gave here I can see where it wouldn't qualify for a speedy at this point- but it would probably still potentially get re-nominated for deletion by the other editor. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   17:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the rescue job. I've been following this story for some years (the video EL's are mine). As one of a handful of City TLDs likely to be delegated under ICANN's new rollout I don't see how it can fail to be notable. That said, the City's trumpeting of "approval" while reliably reported is a jumping of the gun somewhat. The .nyc tld has passed initial valuation - it is yet to be approved. It is assumed by the City and Neustar that the rest is a formality, but there are a few hoops yet. For instance, in a recent appearance in NYC the NTIA's Larry Strickling, in response to a question (17:10), spoke of not renewing .us with Neustar due to a lack of multistakeholderism in its management. Similar objections could yet arise w.r.t. .nyc (I will crosspost this to .nyc talk). Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:52, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your action, but I do have a concern if this is a case of WP:CRYSTAL. Still, it looked like the article had been around for quite a while and last week's action seemed to justify keeping it. I have no special interest beyone being curious after I saw the news story.— Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 16:44, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The development of an application, or even competing applications, for a tld has been pretty well covered in Wikipedia, see .xxx or .africa without anyone invoking WP:CRYSTAL I think. As far as NYC's approval announcement that should be described as just such, with a qualification that the application has only passed initial evaluation, see which has the footnote Disclaimer: Please note that these Initial Evaluation results do not necessarily determine the final result of the application. In limited cases the results might be subject to change. All applications are subjected to due diligence at contracting time, which may include an additional review of the Continued Operations Instrument for conformance to Specification 8 of the Registry Agreement with ICANN. These results do not constitute a waiver or amendment of any provision of the Applicant Guidebook or the Registry Agreement. For updated application status and complete details on the program, please refer to the Applicant Guidebook and the ICANN New gTLDs microsite at .  However, since .nyc is being operated by Neustar, an established registry, it is highly unlikely that there will be any operational objections, hence the confidence.  Wwwhatsup (talk) 20:23, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

I've done a bit of work on the article. More needed. Wwwhatsup (talk) 10:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * More work is needed- can you find more RS that are independent of .nyc? I see that a lot of the sources are primary and what would help ward off AfDs or other deletion stuff would be coverage in non-primary sources. Right now most of the sources on the article are either primary or not stuff that could really give a solid argument for notability. The Punkcast and Villager sources are a good start, though. I'll add some of the sources that were mentioned on my page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I was just looking at your sources. Note the AP story says "a key approval", not approval per se, and mentions the initial evaluation. The other story that says roll out in late 2013 is definitely WP:CRYSTAL. Based on the City's PR. The City's Chief Digital Officer two days ago speculated "end of 2013, early 2014" (48 mins in). Wwwhatsup (talk) 10:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * That's my biggest fear here- that the current sources aren't enough to really show notability in the here and now. Thankfully all we have to do is prove that the proposed domain has received enough coverage in the long term to be notable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Here is one good secondary source on the contract hearing. I didn't mention that yet. Wwwhatsup (talk) 10:22, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks good so far- I see that the site has an editing staff. The writer isn't a staff member, but has a good pedigree. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tidy up on the refs. I'm surprised that you went for the engadget, which is just a reprint of the City's press release, over the AP story! I'll try to find some more time to bring things up to date. Wwwhatsup (talk) 22:29, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh- didn't notice that! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I'll leave this project to the rest of you. I have plenty to keep me busy. I just didn't want to see this not be an article.— Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 18:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The AP story was also carried by the Washington Post, probably not a good ref theough, paywall. Wwwhatsup (talk) 09:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I didn't get a paywall when I clicked on it, so I'd say it's usable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Jinx (children's game)
If you add sources, remove the unreferenced tag. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah! Forgot! Sorry about that! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

About Labconco Corporation
I read your message about the article of Labconco Corporation, the text I copied was referenced in the page http://www.labconco.com/company/company-history and http://www.labconco.com/company/about-labconco, and I had the authorization to copy the contain of the website from the owners, and the page sent has the same contain of the origin website http://www.pharmaceuticalonline.com/EcommCenter/Labconco because they talk about the same company, and I think they have copied the same text from the company website, it is indicated on the right of the page, Can you tell me how to restore my page please   ? Elboukharimu (talk) 11:30, 13 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.250.127.232 (talk)
 * Even if you had permission from the company, we cannot accept articles that use the same text that appears on the company website. The thing about WP:COPYVIO is that we can't guarantee that the company won't rescind their permissions at some point in time. Or find out that the permissions aren't real. However the other big, big reason we can't use anything from the company website is that it's almost always written to promote the company. This is normal and wouldn't be seen as bad on the company website, but when it comes to Wikipedia, we cannot and I repeat CANNOT have any promotional content on here. That page was so unambiguously promotional that there was absolutely no way to save it. It ultimately failed three big things about speedy deletion: it contained copyvio, it was very promotional, and you had absolutely zero sources to show that it passed notability guidelines. The company website is not usable as a reliable source to show notability. If you can find enough reliable sources to show that this company would pass notability guidelines, then we can talk about undeleting the article and working on a better version. I just don't really see anything out there that would show that this company ultimately passes WP:CORP. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   16:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Also, good work improving the article. WP:HEY strikes again. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
For cleaning up and supporting the deletion of the Daniel Perry article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Two kinds of pork (talk • contribs) 16:08, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!
<font face="MV Boli"><font color="#ff0000">D <font color="#ff6600">u <font color="#009900">s <font color="#0000ff">t <font color="#6600cc">i *Let's talk!* 05:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue dress of Meagan Good
Please revisit Articles for deletion/Blue dress of Meagan Good. I have expanded the article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I've commented at the AfD thing. I'm hopeful that there will be continued coverage, but right now it's still too little for an individual article at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't know why something has to have continuous coverage to be notable. Certain single events are encyclopedic. Although I don't know much about dresses, I imagine there is room for more dresses than currently exist.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

User:Penwatchdog
Hi Tokyogirl. I noticed you were the one who deleted a secondary/sub sandbox of mine as I'd requested, is that right? Thanks for handling my request but, unfortunately, something else happened related to the deletion which I thought might cause some confusion. I'd explained it in my deletion request, but perhaps I didn't explain clearly enough. Long-story-short: when the secondary sandbox (for which I'd provided the exact URL) was deleted, contents of my MAIN sandbox (the one which appears in the User-menu at top-right upon log-in) was ALSO deleted. The content on that main sandbox was what I was working on today, and only paused to go for a jog. But that content was my most recent draft, for which I hadn't backed-up yet!

Is that main sandbox content reinstatable by someone without too much of a hassle, or will I be left to spend another day recomposing what I'd spent all night composing the first time? Here's where the confusion probably came in: The content in the Main Sandbox is the same subject as the content in the Sub-Sandbox ("Rene Moncada") but it's the SUB-sandbox ONLY which I'd wanted to have deleted. Confused enough? (lesson learned: next time I'll just keep working on an article in whatever sandbox I'd originally created for it!) Menawhile, please help me get back my long-hours of work! Penwatchdog (talk) 11:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Arigatogozaimato~ THANKS for reinstating those, Tokyogirl! SORRY for the time-suck incurred! There were some my-nute additions/edits to one of them which would've killed an afternoon's work, and required another, if lost. Send ya a case'o wine for that if I could! If I can ever be of service... Penwatchdog (talk) 03:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your detailed statement
Hello Tokyogirl, I just wanted to say thanks for your detailed statement on Articles for deletion/DarkSoul. It was a pleasure to read it. --Ben Ben (talk) 13:57, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem- I'm relatively familiar with the series, as I had a friend whose kid used to really dig it. There are so many clans and books that covering each individual character would be undoable. I'm fairly certain that it's a fanmade character, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   13:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Moving to talk page
I have been informed that YOU deleted my wiki entry under Manx Writers. Very interesting. Who are YOU exactly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.117.218 (talk) 13:51, 14 July 2013
 * Are you talking about the article on Alan Corkish? In that specific case the reason it was deleted was because the article had nothing to show that it passed notability guidelines. He's published, but I saw nothing that showed that those publications are notable. By notable I mean that he and/or his works were the focus of coverage in independent and reliable sources. Just having published something isn't enough and none of the sources on the article were enough to show notability for him. Reviews and interviews in blogs and zines aren't really the type of thing we can use as sources on Wikipedia, not unless the blog/zine in question is a particularly noteworthy one. I searched for sources, as literary articles are sort of my "thing" here on Wikipedia and I try very hard to save as many as I can, but couldn't find anything that would show he's noteworthy enough for an article. Not every person merits an article and I'm sorry to say that Mr. Corkish is not an exception to this rule. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   14:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, by "my wiki entry" do you mean to say that you are Alan Corkish himself? If so, please read WP:COI to see why creating or editing an article on yourself isn't a very good idea. It's also not exactly a very good idea to do it for someone that you're affiliated with either. Now before you argue the "it existed since 2004" card, be aware that just because the article wasn't deleted before this point isn't an arguing point for its inclusion. Many articles existed or still exist on Wikipedia solely because nobody nominated them for deletion in one form or another or because they squeaked by on standards that are now horribly out of date and do not hold by current notability standards, which are quite strict. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   14:13, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

New Adult
i will add new adult writers by --Sunuraju (talk) 05:39, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Sam Sailor (talk) 11:02, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Summertime Killers (series)
Just been reviewing old pages and came across The Summertime Killer (series). Now, I'm not sure if this actually exists or not or if it's a hoax, which I am leaning towards due to lack of sources and IMDB only covers the film. There is also List of The Summertime Killer Series characters. But for a series that apparently ran over 10 years, coverage/mentions are curiously absent. I don't feel 100% confident though in calling "Hoax" so thought I'd seek a second opinion. Thanks so much. Mabalu (talk) 11:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks to be a pretty blatant hoax. The series supposedly ran for 11 years, yet there are no sources about it. A look at the various pages for this sort of makes it seem like it's a hoax that's being added and worked on by quite a few editors, which actually makes it a little worse. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   11:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I see that User:TSKS1973 is also uploading hoax material, so I'm thinking that we might need to block them to prevent them from re-adding this stuff. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   11:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked both users and all of the pages have been tagged as hoaxes, the only one that remains is the one about the song, which actually does exist. That one I redirected to the guy who wrote it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   11:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Sometimes I should be more confident. Mabalu (talk) 07:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It's cool- there were quite a bit of hoax entries they made, so bringing it to me enabled me to block both of the users, so you did the right thing! You have a pretty good feel for things, so you should trust yourself a little more. :) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Axis41page
I have revised the Axis41 page. I redid the sources to show legitimate third party sources, and I rewrote the timeline following the Comcast template. Please let me know what you think. RoaryHollace (talk) 21:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Snub TV
Since you seem to like the odd AfD, you might like to peruse this one. One of the producers of the tv show that is the subject of the article doesn't like the content, mostly unsourced, and has submitted an AfD. There is a sympathetic admin on the scene. I have a COI but am defending the one sourced fact. The nominator, plus another experienced editor, have pointed out many other sources, thus notability is not seriously at issue. Wwwhatsup (talk) 00:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)


 * As a Brit growing up in the 1980s, I'll give you some background into this. Snub TV was, as far as I know (and a quick Google Books search confirms it) part of the "Def II" series of programmes broadcast on weekday evenings on BBC2 from around 1987 - 1991. It was designed to replace the much-loved and fondly remembered The Old Grey Whistle Test as a new "hip" and "trendy" set of culture programmes for kids and 20 somethings. It fell out of favour for being generally a bit crap and was ultimately replaced by the "bit-like-whistle-test-but-slightly-cooler" Later With Jools Holland, which remains a popular show for live bands to appear on to this day. tl;dr - it's notable. Ritchie333  <sup style="color:#7F007F;">(talk)  <sup style="color:#7F007F;">(cont)   14:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks Ritchie333. Illuminative. The point of contention is that, a couple of years before, the original version of the program was a USA series, produced by a USA corp, essentially with the UK producers as work for hire, not to deny they did nearly all the actual programming and came up with the name. After two series the two sides fell out, and the third series was produced in the USA. When later the two UK producers got the BBC deal they formed their own production company, and used the same name and concept. Fortunately for them, the USA folks did not interfere. There is now a prospect of some retrospective DVD releases of the UK series. With this in mind one of the UK producers is getting hot under the collar that there is any mention on Wikipedia of the USA series, and has put the article up for AfD. Wwwhatsup (talk) 19:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Tgrl I had to adjust your "concurrent" copy as it was in fact inaccurate. The BBC Series was a separate entity sometime after the USA. Wwwhatsup (talk) 00:18, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The AfD has been closed. Might you review and see if the "multiple issues" tag is still valid after your clean up? Wwwhatsup (talk) 21:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

18seconds Magazine
Hi Tokyogirl79 Does the 79 reference in your profile name, mean you were born in 1979? Me too!!

Andy here from 18seconds Magazine (editor). Recently noticed you had contributed to the deletion of our page. You wrote, "I just unfortunately couldn't find anything to show notability. The stuff I did find were the types of things that can't be considered independent and/or reliable.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79"

Do these links count as notability? http://www.surfersvillage.com/surfing-news/49237 http://www.misfitmedia.com.au/publishers/18seconds-magazine/ http://www.runamukvisuals.com/the-archives/spreading-filth-18-seconds-magazine/ http://www.bandt.com.au/companies/traditional-media-and-broadcasting/sporting-fitness/general-sport/18seconds-magazine http://www.toddrosewall.com/index.php/item/88-cstetur-adipisicing-elit http://www.theloop.com.au/ANLI/project/69082

Please consider re-listing the following information:

18seconds Magazine (www.18seconds.com.au) is a bi-monthly digital surfing magazine published in Australia. It features articles about the ocean and travelling. The magazine was founded in 2010 by Andy Morris (former assistant editor of Australia's Surfing Life Magazine www.surfinglife.com.au). As of 2013, the editor is Andy Morris and the designer is Alicia Smith. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.167.38.151 (talk) 06:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmm... the problem is that those are all pretty much WP:PRIMARY sources, as they look to be press releases or just listings of the magazine in various locations. The type of thing we'd need would be if someone did an article on you. For instance, if the Village Voice did an article on you, that would be usable as a reliable source. You might also want to talk to someone at some of the Aussie papers such as The Age, since coverage by them would be usable as a RS as well.  Another avenue for coverage would be if you had a notable surfer (someone who has a Wikipedia article would be best) write about your magazine on a blog. The trouble with that is that you'd have to ensure that they aren't involved somehow with the magazine, such as working for it and/or that they haven't been covered in the magazine extensively. (IE, to avoid people saying that they're writing about you because you wrote an article about them. It's sort of why I sort of usually try to avoid blogs in general- too many rules against using them than for.) It just can't be a reprinting of a press release- those aren't usable regardless of where they're posted. Now the Surfer's Village site looks like it might eventually become a reliable source, but at this point in time it's just too new and I can't verify its editorial process. (Plus the link given is to a press release, it seems.) Don't worry if this sounds frustrating, as the whole "is this a RS or not" stuff can seem pretty well, confusing and frustrating even to those of us that's been around for a long time. I think it's just still too soon for this to have an article right now. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

51/49 - The smart HR
Hello, please delete this page again and change the recreate or recreate ability to sysop for this article and similar case because it is repeatedly created by the same person. Thanks, Surfer43 (talk) 05:58, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. Looks like they created it 3 times under different capitalizations so I'll protect each version. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I also edited the sockpuppet page to show that they'd created this page multiple times and it seems like an obvious sock. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:43, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
- →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  11:31, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Memphis Group
Hi, I see that you've just speedy G11'ed the Memphis Group article. I can't see the article any more, so I don't know if it was ever tagged as G11 or if it was summarily deleted. Was this "Memphis" as in the 1980s post-modernist furniture design group? If so, that's a pretty significant design agency and really far from G11 territory. If this was the subject of the article, can it please be restored. Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 09:25, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It was, but it was speedied for being fairly promotional in tone. I'll restore it if you promise to clean it up. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:08, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Griddle Toast
Hello Tokyogirl79. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Griddle Toast, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''I don't think this is vandalism - the author doesn't understand what an encyclopedia is for, but did not intend to damage it. Let the AfD take care of it - it may well SNOW there.''' Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 11:22, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Praj_Industries deleted
Hi, we went through many rounds of reviews and finally managed to get the article approved. Please believe me that we do not intend to use this as an advertising tool at all, and are willing to make whatever changes are required if you could just guide me in the right direction.

Jagdisha (talk) 15:09, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

I understand that Wikipedia has its own set of rules, and that every article needs to conform to them, to be accepted. Deleting an already accepted article is also your perogative, but could you please at least let me know the reasons for deletion? This is my first wikipedia article, so your help and suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Jagdisha (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Well... the problem is that getting approval through AfC doesn't guarantee that the article passes notability guidelines. If anything, I've noticed an increasing problem with editors approving pages that have very severe issues that go against several guidelines. Some of the articles don't even remotely pass notability guidelines. It appears that in this particular case, the editor that approved it and moved it to the mainspace has since been blocked as being a sockpuppet of someone that appears to have had a habit of passing promotional articles. Because of that, I have to ask flat out: are you related in any way, shape, or form to the company? If so, then I really need to know this up front. I do think that you mean well, but I've got a sneaking suspicion that you are involved with the company and got some really, really terrible advice from someone that was coming on here and creating promotional articles. (A person that might have been paid to edit or approve the article.) This is heavily frowned upon, but I just really get the impression that you were the person that was taken advantage of here. The reason is that you seem to be honestly perplexed at this article's deletion.


 * In any case, here are some of the reasons: The article was written in a way that came off as a promotional article. It didn't list the company's stock prices or tell people where to go to purchase things, but it didn't really have a neutral overall tone. It read like it was something you'd find in a press release or on the company website. Phrases such as "With the acquisition of Neela Systems, Praj now provides integrated solutions to the Pharmaceutical_industry" come across as promotional in tone. Phrases such as "integrated solutions" are pretty big buzz words in press releases and advertisements in general, so these sort of things need to be avoided like the plague. Sentences such as "LHN products provide solutions to a variety of health and productivity improvement opportunities in the dairy, poultry and aqua segments in a natural way, as specialty feed supplements" also come across as promotional in tone.


 * The other problem I noticed is that while you did link to a lot of sources, not all of them are really usable as 'reliable sources. Here's a rundown of the sources:


 * 1) This one is actually sort of usable, although you'd get some people saying that it's far too brief and looks to be routine coverage. However I'm aware that Indian newspapers don't exactly go in for the pages and pages of prose that the American counterparts do, which is what many users will be more familiar with. I'd consider this to be a usable enough source, in any case.
 * 2) This is just the company's stock listing and director's report. Being on the stock exchange isn't enough for notability purposes and the director's report would be considered a WP:PRIMARY source. By this I mean that it was released by the company itself, which means that it cannot give notability. It can back up minor details, but that's about it.
 * 3) This is a press release. While this was printed in Yahoo India, press releases will always be considered a primary source.
 * 4) This one is far too brief and also looks to be based off of a press release. Even if it isn't, it's only a few lines long. Even by Indian newspaper standards this is considered to be WP:TRIVIAL coverage. What I mean by that is that the coverage is so light that it can only back up trivial data and isn't considered to be anything in-depth enough to show notability.
 * 5) This is just a business directory. No matter where it's posted, basic data such as this is considered to be a primary source at best. We generally don't use anything of this nature as a source in any context, as all it does is prove that the company exists and nobody is really doubting its existence. It's almost always better to avoid using sources such as this, as having a ton of links at the bottom of the page doesn't equal out to notability. You need quite a bit of in-depth coverage to pass WP:CORP, but adding this stuff in tends to be more of a warning to other editors than a showing of notability.
 * 6) Routine stock listing, can't show notability.
 * 7) Same issue here- the problem is that this isn't considered to be something that would give notability per the English language Wikipedia.
 * 8) This is something I'd tentatively consider a reliable source. I say tentatively, as I'm not overly familiar with the paper it was originally posted on, the Hindu Business Line. Wikipedia is fairly strict in what it considers to be a reliable source and one of the big things they check for is whether or not there is an editorial process. Offhand I'd say that this would probably be usable.
 * 9) Another routine stock listing.
 * 10) This is another press release.
 * 11) This sort of feels like it was taken from a press release, but it looks to have been written by a staff member of the Business Standard. It's overall usable, although someone could question what it came from. That's one of the difficult things of sourcing: if someone just rewrites a press release, it comes into question how in-depth the coverage really is. However the Business Standard is considered overall reliable, so it's something I'd consider a reliable source.
 * 12) This one is undeniably usable. Forbes India is a known site that does strong work and there's no question of this being a good reliable source.
 * 13) This is another profile on a database. This is considered a primary source.
 * 14) Another routine stock listing.
 * 15) Another Business Standard article. This would be fairly usable, but would have the same scrutiny as the above article. I'd use it as a RS in any case.
 * 16) This source would probably undergo a lot of scrutiny. People would first ask if this was paid for by Praj Industries, which would make the ratings suspect. It doesn't always matter how well respected a company might be, the paying for of services will always make people wonder if things are made more or less positive because they were paid for. They would then ask how the company's rating was procured and the process. There are several things that they'd question, so I'd probably say that this would be a trivial source at best. I wouldn't rely on it giving notability. Don't take this badly: most awards, certifications, and ratings aren't considered to be major enough to give notability on Wikipedia and/or are questioned so sharply that they aren't seen as anything other than trivial in scope and can't give partial or complete notability.
 * 17) This is good, but many would question how much notability it truly gave, as it's a list of 200 companies. If it was smaller and was only 20-50 companies, you'd get a lot less questioning about this. Many would consider this to be trivial coverage when it came down to it. Much like awards and certifications, being included in a list isn't always enough to really give notability. There would be a lot of questions surrounding this list, so I'd recommend not overly relying on it as a reliable source that would give complete notability. Frustrating, I know, as Forbes is otherwise considered to be reliable, but discerning between what is or isn't reliable is always a fairly arcane and confusing maze.
 * 18) I'd consider this to be usable as a source. Outlook Money is fairly well thought of.
 * 19) This is another very short article that would probably get questioned by some editors, but looks to be usable for the most part.


 * In any case, there's a rundown of the sources. Now what I'll do for you is transfer a copy of this into your userspace for you to work on. What I'd recommend is removing all of the business directory and stock market listings. I'd also recommend that you look through for press release buzz words and eliminate those as well. I would also recommend getting someone from WikiProject Companies to help edit and look over the article as a whole. I'm willing to help out as well, if needs be, but it'd be good to have someone specifically from that page take you under their wing as a whole. User:16912 Rhiannon looks to be a fairly capable editor. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   15:53, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I've moved it to User:Jagdisha/Praj Industries. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   15:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

@Tokyogirl79 I can't thank you enough for your feedback. I think I finally get what the essence of a Wikipedia article is. Shall get this fixed. No, I'm not directly associated with Praj, but I do hold Mr. Pramod Chaudhari in very high esteem, and felt that if he warranted a Wikipedia entry, surely his company did, too. I tried replicating the format of other notable Indian companies, like Kirloskar Oil Engines, Persistent Sytems, etc. But it looks like more work is needed. Thanks again. Jagdisha (talk) 18:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Please reinstate Galbatron at once
Please give the exact criteria for "somewhat promotional". If you think the page is somewhat promotional, then edit it. Do not delete it. As far we can see, the original contents were pretty neutral; it was even stated that the band got negative reviews in the biggest keyboard magazine of Europe.

Wikipedia has full permission for using the content and illustration at said page. You can verify at info@galbatron.nl (the band's mail address) and/or aaron@aaronbieber.com (the e-mail address of the maker of said illustration). The band's logo has been uploaded under a Fair Use policy and the band found the existing text on Wikipedia so good that they used it on their new website (which was launched after the original article on Wikipedia). Obviously Wikipedia can't be blamed for using a text that was copied by the artists themselves.

This article has been on Wikipedia for years. Please consult/talk before taking drastic steps like deletion. Please try to reinstate the page as soon as possible, as else we'll need to get permission for using Galbatron.jpg again as the image is used in no other Wikipedia articles. Thank you in advance.

As we don't feel like going through the whole approval process for Galbatron.jpg again, please note that I'll put this one up for a deletion review if you have not responded in 24 hours. Thank you for your understanding.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Galious77
 * First off, I need to warn you that just because a page has existed for years doesn't mean that it merits an entry. Sometimes all this means is that the page itself has somehow not been noticed until now. Secondly, a speedy deletion doesn't undergo a discussion like an WP:AfD would and doesn't require one. The deleting admin doesn't have to go through a discussion with anyone. I don't mean to sound rude or condescending about that, just that a speedy doesn't require a discussion.


 * That said, there were a lot of problems with the page. Other than the page seeming as if it was a copyvio of the band's page, it was also very, VERY promotionally written. It didn't read like a neutral and encyclopedic entry. An example would be that you say things such as "they did regard MP3.com's payments for downloads as a symbolic reward and a necessary incentive to continue making music" and you don't tell the reader to google information on the band and look for sources. You have to actually link to the sources within the article as references. I did google, but I didn't see anything that actually verifies any of the claims within the article. I'll run this through WP:AfD if you want a discussion but without sources to verify any of the claims I don't really see where it will be saved. I wouldn't be surprised if it ended up getting speedied again as sheer promotional content. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   13:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I'd like to add, as a talk page stalker, you used the term "we" a few times. I invite you to visit the following pages, our COI page, our page on Neutrality (you can also go to the neutral point of view policy, and finally our policy on shared accounts. <font face="MV Boli"><font color="#ff0000">D <font color="#ff6600">u <font color="#009900">s <font color="#0000ff">t <font color="#6600cc">i *Let's talk!* 03:16, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Wolbong market
Hi Tokyogirl79,

2 Days ago you deleted an article I made about Wolbong market in Ulsan, South Korea. I was notified about the page being marked for deletion, but I was unable to improve the article before it was deleted 4 hours later. I would like the chance to improve the article, since I think that it is a notable topic and an important tourist attraction. I realize that part of the problem could have been that I had stated that the market was inexpensive, and I suppose I shouldn't have used that wording and instead have been more neutral. Please, if I could continue to work on the article, I would appreciate it very much.

Thank you for your time Rystheguy (talk) 04:50, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi again. I've redone the article to remove any neutrality issues and added more information and sources. I'm going to post the article again in the next few days if you don't have any objections. Thank you Rystheguy (talk) 00:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

About the deletion of my article Himal (magazine)
Hi There, You have deleted my article. Please let me know the reasons and help to reference it. It is very popular and one of the best news magazine in Nepal. You can get any info from Nepali Wikipedians. Thanks Ashishlohorung (talk) 14:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

MatrixSSL
Hi, I was about to remove the red MatrixSSL redlinks, and then I did a quick search and found refs [www.ietf.org/proceedings/67/slides/tls-3/tls-3.ppt‎] so I requested at WP:UNDELETE. Regards Widefox ; talk 07:58, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

WP:RFD
Hi Tokyogirl79! Thanks for sending me this knowledgeable message on my talk page recently:" "Hi! I just wanted to let you know that you can't use PRODs on redirects. I don't know that these would qualify for a speedy delete as a redirect, so the best place to go would be WP:RfD as far as deletion goes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 3:58 am, 15 July 2013, Monday (14 days ago) (UTC−5)"

I'm just passing on some news in case this helps you: Today I took your advice: I went to WP:RfD and learned that what I needed was WP:RFD, or "Redirects for Discussion" (and by "Discussion" they mean "Delete"); a process just for Redirects. So I followed their RFD process for these that I have and hopefully they will get to it! WP:RFD Cheers, —Prhartcom   (talk)  00:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi again Tokyogirl79! Well, it didn't go very well when I submitted the first several redirects I have to AfD.  They ignored my rational and decided they know best, and kept them all.  I was surprised; I thought Admins like their "Delete" button (I would!) and I certainly thought they would like it if someone wants to clean up, but no. I won't be submitting any more there, ever. It's OK, I shouldn't have spent the afternoon cleaning up, I should have spent it writing.  —Prhartcom   (talk)  18:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

.post
Speaking of top level domains, if you have time, take a look at this recent bunch of edits on .post. I'll look for time to go in and do some clean up, but not immediately. Wwwhatsup (talk) 11:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandal_Vikrant - Need to Claim my page
Hi Tokyogirl,

I had my Wikipedia page with the name Vikrant Sandal, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandal_Vikrant, which was deleted or non-existent page on July 20, 2013. I want to claim my listing of the webpage. I am an Indian entrepreneur and social activist. Following are few of the links regarding my achievement: I really want to claim my page. Could you please help me with the further process and procedure so that I can fulfill condition for the webpage. Looking forward to your response. Thank You
 * 1) . http://iimsam.org/images/iimsam%20official%20press%20release%2024%20March%202010.pdf
 * 2) . http://www.indianexpress.com/news/wonder-food-with-all-nutrients/1091511/
 * 3) . http://paper.hindustantimes.com/epaper/viewer.aspx
 * 4) . http://www.iimsam.org/images/IIMSAM-OfficialPressRelease-UniversityOfOxford-UK-01-05-09[1].pdf
 * 5) . http://www.iimsam.org/images/IIMSAM-INDIA-2011-2012.pdf
 * 6) . http://www.iimsam.org/images/IIMSAM%20PRESS%20RELEASE%20PUBLIC%20INFORMATION%20OUTREACH%20UNIT-NEW%20YORK%20HQTS-2013.pdf
 * 7) . http://www.iimsam.org/facilitators.php?region=india
 * 8) . http://www.iimsamspirulinapledge.org/isp/ispvsandal.aspx
 * 9) . http://www.hashbiotech.com/hashbiotech/ab_management.aspx
 * 10) . http://himachalpradeshnews.blogspot.in/2009/03/hash-biotech-selected-by-un-to-promote.html
 * 11) . http://newspunjab.blogspot.in/2009/02/hash-biotech-labs-is-official-working.html
 * 12) . http://vikrantsandal.blogspot.in/
 * 13) . http://www.scribd.com/doc/136282623/IIMSAM-INDIA-2011-2012
 * 14) . http://www.hindustantimes.com/Punjab/Jalandhar/Another-Pak-candidate-makes-Punjab-proud/SP-Article1-1059643.aspx
 * 15) . http://www.supplierindia.com/view_profile.php?id=3478
 * 16) . http://www.heliogreen.net/content/view/594/21/lang,fr/
 * 17) . http://www.whoislog.info/profile/vikrant-sandal.html
 * 18) . http://www.thefullwiki.org/Vikrant_Sandal
 * 19) . http://health-mania.com/wonder-food-with-all-nutrients/
 * 20) . http://www.articleclick.com/Article/IIMSAM-takes-up-spirulina-to-tackle-malnutrition/1194073
 * 21) . http://company.hellocompanies.com/english/1122/312463667/Hash-BioTech-Labs-Pvt-Ltd.html
 * 22) . http://www.manufacturerss.com/company264094.html
 * 23) . http://www.tradingbiz.com/company/india/hash-biotech-labs-pvt-ltd-chandigarh/
 * 24) . http://www.free-press-release-center.info/pr00000000000000037543_chandigarh-based-biotech-company-becomes-official-working-partner-with-the-un.html
 * 25) . http://www.indiamart.com/hash-biotech-pvtltd/aboutus.html
 * 26) . http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iimsam-to-launch-spirulina-initiative-in-nepal-1235534450.html
 * 27) . http://www.indianexpress.com/news/first-biotech-farm-of-state-comes-up-in-dasuya/433108/
 * 28) . http://chandigarhia.blogspot.in/
 * 29) . http://www.farazkhan.org/awards.php
 * 30) . http://gizellecommunication.com/awards.php
 * 31) . http://goarticles.com/article/Chandigarh-Based-Biotech-Company-Becomes-Official-Working-Partner-with-the-UN/1504186/
 * 32) . http://www.ksf.co.in/ksf/theteam.aspx
 * 33) . http://diamondlalji.blogspot.in/
 * 34) . http://www.hash-group.com/about.htm
 * VIKRANT SANDAL
 * FOUNDER & CHAIRMAN


 * CORPORATE HEADOFFICE
 * HASH BIOTECH LABS PVT LTD
 * SCO 485-486, SECTOR 35 C,
 * CHANDIGARH -160035, INDIA


 * T    : +91 (0) 172 498 8888
 * F   : +91 (0) 172 498 8899
 * TOLL FREE: 1 800 103 8900
 * M   : +91 (0)  9377 00 0001
 * E   : vikk@HashBiotech.com
 * S     : www.HashBiotech.com


 * PRODUCTION FACILITY
 * HASH BIOTECH FARMS
 * HOSHIARPUR ROAD, DASUYA
 * DIST: HOSHIARPUR, PUNJAB -144205, INDIA


 * T    : +91 (0) 1883 291 777
 * F   : +91 (0) 1883 291 778
 * M   : +91 (0)  9377 00 0001
 * E   : vikk@HashBiotech.com
 * S     : www.HashBiotech.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.173.222.249 (talk) 06:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


 * To Vikrant Sandal: I stopped by this page for other business and saw your request to User:Tokyogirl79.  What you should please understand is that under the Wikipedia policy WP:COI, it is strongly discouraged that persons write about themselves or about topics of which they have a too-close vested interest. Your BEING Vikrant Sanda and writing abot yourself falls under this policy's consideration. Further, no article on Wikipedia can be claimed or "owned" by anyone. See WP:OWN, and I encourage you read WP:PRIMER. We rely on independent reliable sources... that is we use sources which have editorial oversight and a reputation for fact checking and accuracy. This means we do not use press releasess, blogs or self-published websites. If you would like, the article can be returned to you through the email you provided above so that you can post in on a Wikia or Wordpress site.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)