User talk:ReyHahn/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos Medina (December 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carlos Medina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  18:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Carlos Medina has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Carlos Medina. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  23:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos Medina has been accepted
 Carlos Medina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Mr. Guye (talk) 14:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diamagnetism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Effective mass ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Diamagnetism check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Diamagnetism?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SciPost Physics (March 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Headbomb was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SciPost Physics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SciPost Physics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:SciPost_Physics Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Headbomb&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:SciPost_Physics reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:56, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fermi gas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plasma ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Fermi_gas check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Fermi_gas?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Free electron model, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloch's theorem ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Free_electron_model check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Free_electron_model?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks
Didn't see my mistake that I did to Robinson Technologies with the Android link. But, thanks for fixing it for me!― YoloMaxi  &#9742;  (contribs) 22:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fine electronic structure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamiltonian ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Fine_electronic_structure check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Fine_electronic_structure?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Page Move Discussion
Hello, I see that you've edited the article on Rajneesh. I would like to ask you to give your thought on the page move discussion. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rajneesh#Requested_move_11_June_2018 Accesscrawl (talk) 07:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi here is the pdf of reference [1]
Before speaking too soon I advise you to actually read the paper first and don't make please any rush conclusions....

and reconsider you vote on the AfD. Rememeber even Hall effect sensors are ferromagnetic...

see fig. 8 in pdf, there were there all the time, right under our nose!...

https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.08751 (pdf)

I guess there is a lot a confusion on the matter. The confusion relies because you think as monopoles as magnetic charge particles like electrons are for Electricity. These are not definitive discovered as we all know although there is much research ongoing.

This paper does not talk about magnetic monopoles directly. However paper is giving out all the hints suggesting that the poles of a magnet itself are each a macro scopic monopoles. This is because the lower potential ground state flux made possible to be observed by the superparamagnetic (not ferromagnetic) ferrolens shows no immediate and direct flux between the two poles of a magnet but rather loops between each pole and the domain wall of the magnet in the middle (see fig.8) which is about 100nm thick. Therefore making up two distinct magnetic monopole bubbles. So, dipole magnet consists of two opposite separate monopole fields tangent at the Bloch domain wall since there is no direct flux connection between the two pole of a magnet. Imagine it like a brain structure.

Kind Regards,

sorry I forgot to sign,

I saw you post on the AfD, I did not know that this was for bitten.

Markoulw (talk) 21:52, 26 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Ok, I just edited my comment. --MaoGo (talk) 22:20, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Orbital angular momentum of free electrons
, thanks for the nice theory section! I adjusted the figure as you suggested, and made one sentence in the theory section more specific to distinguish between preparation and measurement of OAM states (both of which can produce an electron OAM eigenstate).Tyharvey313 (talk) 12:22, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jurin's law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meniscus ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jurin%27s_law check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jurin%27s_law?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Capillary action into Jurin's law. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:52, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SciPost Physics


Hello, MaoGo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SciPost Physics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * thanks for the notice. I wish to recover the article but not recover the title of the draft, I would like a userfication, how do I do this? --MaoGo (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * MaoGo -- Go to WP:REFUND and request undeletion using the exact title (Draft:SciPost Physics). The only thing different you have to do in the request is to ask for it to be userfied. -- Dolotta (talk) 00:02, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Guaido
Hi Any source said that Guaido is acting president. --Panam2014 (talk) 15:18, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * , I have not found an "explicit" source either. --MaoGo (talk) 16:39, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * he was ready to assume the country's presidency. See here He is not acting president. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Proxima Centauri b
Hello. I'm sorry I don't really understand your objection regarding CNRS. As Wikipedia's own article shows CNRS directly employs research teams, as well as managing other teams in cooperation with universities. So it is quite possible the researchers involved here are not affiliated with any other organisation other than CNRS. ChiZeroOne (talk) 21:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * sorry for not being more clear. The CNRS is a the French organisation of research. Almost all fundamental science in France is carried by CNRS. That means that if there is some lab in France, the employees there are mostly from CNRS. So I find it kind of vague for an article to say that CNRS found something. I read the reference and it does not help, there has to be a institutional/geographical place were this research came from (maybe some observatory?,or a collaboration?). The best thing would be to find the original paper to see from where this research came from. Maybe the matter is not that important, but maybe an additional source would be nice. --MaoGo (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Capillary length
@MaoGo. I really don't understand why you are going through all the pages i am updating and removing my edits. We have discussed the Jurins law page and cannot agree as we both think our own versions are better, but why do you follow my edits and change them back?Thomas Surrey Physics (talk) 17:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * sorry if I am being too rush with you. How new you are to Wikipedia? What I do not understand is the following: you make a contribution, I update the style and add your contributions, but then you revert everything back. For example Bond number has an special style, Bo cannot be in italics, you write an equation in italics, so I modify it to comply with the rest of the article, but then you revert everything. --MaoGo (talk) 17:14, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Your help desk question
You didn't get a response to this question. Did you find your answer? I don't have any ideas. I didn't even know there were different types of Spanish even in South America. I knew parts of Spain had different pronunciations than the New World, as my Spanish dictionary called it.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  20:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * sadly, I didn't get an answer. Spanish is almost the "same" in South America (it is intelligible between any two speakers) but you can have "minor" word changes and differences in pronunciation (that most people consider as allophones). There was a debate in Juan Guaidó page, where some wanted to hold the standard Spanish in the IPA pronunciation, while others preferred the local version. To solve it we just did Venezuelan which gives Venezuelan . I hope there is a guideline for this, if not one should be proposed, I guess that also the template should be fixed.--MaoGo (talk) 21:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!
... for filling in the bare URL I stuck in there while I was away from home! By the way, I sometimes augment Washington Post or New York Times sources because they are behind a paywall, and I have to go to my library to see them. Thanks again, Sandy Georgia (Talk)  21:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * you are welcome, visual edit did all the work. Thank you Sandy for your enormous work on the matter. Would you prefer if I add quotes when I cite one of those sources? I am trying to get best quality refs, I am not particularly fan of El Pitazo. Also if you need some excerpt don't hesitate to ask.--MaoGo (talk) 21:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I can get them eventually, but I have to go through my library. And it bothers me that the same will happen to our readers.  I guess just add the quotes if you think they are helpful to our readers, as I eventually catch up on both New York Times and Washington Post and Miami Herald via my library.  Best, Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  22:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry for adding the Marshall Islands' support for Guaido, I thought I was helping. Thank you for clarifying it. --LLcentury (talk) 20:53, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * we have the allies and opposition to Guaido's administration covered in Responses to the 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis. --MaoGo (talk) 20:56, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Perfect, I hadn't seen that article. Sorry again. --LLcentury (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Please do not continue to rearrange the requested move
Hello, In about a week, an uninvolved administrator will simply take into consideration all of the commentary and determine if a consensus exists. You do not need to reorganize the requested move into subsections based on date; we're not starting a separate discussion, we're simply trying to get third parties to join in & for an uninvolved user to decide if there is a consensus. Thank you. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 09:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * A new request for moves calls for new users to come like Sir Edison, context has to be given. --MaoGo (talk) 09:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you wish we can discuss what should be added up there. A new section is totally necessary.--MaoGo (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * SirEdison is not a new user. I pinged him in May because he was involved in the first requested move. He left his comment before I started the RM.
 * It's not relevant that a few weeks have passed. The RM message itself in the Requested Move template explicitly mentions that it's been discussed for weeks, as they can clearly see by how every message was posted in May. In actuality, it doesn't matter that those messages were in May and these messages are in June. All of the messages are about the same topic & determine the same consensus because the original discussion never closed. Needlessly adding a division between them is just a distraction. Brendon the Wizard  ✉️ ✨ 09:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * That was not my original intention. My proposal was to start a new discussion that was less contaminated with the whole previous talks. Let us have it your way then and discuss what matters in one talk.--MaoGo (talk) 11:02, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Economy of Venezuela
Hi. You can read in Reuters that “la variación interanual se ubicó en 815.194%, según la medición del Congreso”. I do not know why you say “that's not national assembly estimate”. Regards, — Vercelas  20:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * the one you are adding is the Central Bank estimation, released under unclear circumstances, if you wish to add it, put it below under a different name. --MaoGo (talk) 21:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)


 * No, I'm not adding the BCV estimates. This news adds both the estimates of the Assembly and those of the Central Bank, which by the way, I have used only the first estimates (National Assembly). I see no need to look for another reference. You can check it in local news. — Vercelas  21:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm trying to confirm that version but I get something different from the Asamblea Nacional website --MaoGo (talk) 21:41, 10 June 2019 (UTC)


 * That is April inflation . It seems that something is wrong with that website. — Vercelas  21:44, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ok, El Nacional seems to agree . My bad, be free to revert it but add a ref to a local source.--MaoGo (talk) 21:49, 10 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Don't worry. Regards. — Vercelas  21:53, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * sorry to bother again, the local source is not necessary, you are right, thanks for clearing that up. --MaoGo (talk) 21:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Added paramters to Template:Infobox nuclear reactor
Hi MaoGo, I added the parameters operator and criticality to the infobox! For an example see Chicago Pile-1. I hope this is what you needed! All the best, Tony Mach (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Edmond Bouty
Thanks for reverting my unsuccessful attempt to correctly highlight Edmond Bouty. He has French Wiki page entry, but I could never get it to work in Pierre Weiss's English language Wiki page, and when I tried to backtrack out of it, I got stymied.

But, yes, a red highlight (or no highlight at all) is preferable to an incorrect blue one. So, again, thanks. Cheers, JMN100

Jmn100 (talk) 05:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

User:BrendonTheWizard listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User:BrendonTheWizard. Since you had some involvement with the User:BrendonTheWizard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Vanilla          Wizard      💙 17:50, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Abbreviation of Zitterbewegung
Hi MaoGo - Great job on starting or helping to start up that entry on the Zitterbewegung hypothesis. As for the abbrevation, it's one that Hestenes uses - and a pretty common one now in my email exchanges with Hestenes, Burinskii and other researchers (Ines Urdaneta, Richard Gauthier, Diederik Aerts, etcetera). But I am happy to revert to the full name. We should respect the German language by writing it with capital letter then. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean Louis Van Belle (talk • contribs) 14:18, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * there are bigger issues with the article as pointed by XOReaster, I won't continue the discussion please refer to the admin notice.--MaoGo (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

@MaoGo: great job ! I have published my edits on my blogs and I'll let my readers judge on the 'bigger issues' you and 'XOR'easter' seem to notice. Cheers ! It was a great first and last experience on Wikipedia. JL

@MaoGo: I still haven't figured this out, but I got an invitation to the 'Tea House' and clicked here and there. I left this response with the 'example' of an experienced 'mediator' (Mz7): "Hi Mz7 - I tried to edit the Wiki on the Zitterbewegung article but that spiraled into an epic failure. The exchange is copied below. I am not good at these online fora (I am a rather old man, I am afraid - but experience makes up for being savvy, right? Any case - I got invited to a Tea House conversation and all that. I am not so interested because I do have an daytime job (like you) and, then, well... No time to waste time in general. I was upset because ALL of the edits/additions were reverted by the 'incumbents'. I don't think that's fair. There's knowledge and science in what I write. I've served. I am not about self-promotion. Any case... Interesting... :-) Cheers - JL" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean Louis Van Belle (talk • contribs) 17:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I do not know how the Tea House works. I agree with the reversal of the edits, please better discuss here (ANI). --MaoGo (talk) 16:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

At MaoGo - I don't understand much of this business but, yes, the zbw wiki is VERY important. We need to work this out. It's important for Wikipedia's credibility - combining the idea of an encyclopedia with the idea of 'online creativity'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.224.224.37 (talk) 16:59, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Be careful, contacting users for support outside the main discussion can be taken as an act of WP:CANVASSING. Please abstain from contacting me directly and discuss here. --MaoGo (talk) 17:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey MaoGo - so how do we go about this zbw wiki now? Why don't you put the edits to which you have no objection? What upset me was that ALL edits got cancelled. I didn't see why. Any case, I'll let you edit as you seem to be the 'owner' of this wiki, right? So just go over my text and see what you like. Cheers - JL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean Louis Van Belle (talk • contribs) 15:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * some of the content can be restored if more sources (secondary and tertiary sources, reliable sources, important books, highly cited sources etc.) are provided.--MaoGo (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi MaoGo - I cited primary resources (e.g. Hestenes - and then I quoted from Dirac's Principles itself). Also, Burinskii is an established first-hand source. Apart from references to my own work, I don't see why these sources were not considered to be 'good enough'. I would pretty much stick to the original edits I did - and just remove references to my own work. Would that be acceptable to you and XOR'Easter? I'd appreciate you double-check with him. We all have limited time for this, and so our use of time is always a trade-off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean Louis Van Belle (talk • contribs) 09:58, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello again, please read WP:SECONDARY. We need secondary sources neither primary nor original research. You can discuss with everyone here.--MaoGo (talk) 14:19, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

I do not understand one of your sentences on Talk:Responses_to_the_2019_Venezuelan_presidential_crisis
What does Even if there are documented cases of the same institutions calling themselves that like the Armed forces or the ANC? mean? What is "ANC"? Are you saying that some Venezuelan institutions (probably their spokesperson) declared themselves "pro-Maduro"? It is my opinion that in that case "pro-Maduro" (or similar) should be used on a person-by-person basis. We are talking about a possible civil war here, and I doubt all officers would support the Maduro government if larger conflict broke out.

I thought it would be more tidy to clear that sub-issue here before continuing on the article's talk page. Notrium (talk) 11:51, 15 October 2019 (UTC)


 * I mean that the leader or the institution has declared some kind of loyalty to the current president: Armed forces. I cannot find a ANC official statement, but the presidential oath of Maduro was made in front of the ANC, their members are all from pro-Maduro parties and its president(s) has (have) assured loyalty to Maduro many times. I will answer to your comment in the bottom of the talk later. Please I would prefer to keep the discussion contained in that talk, I would avoid to continue the discussion here unless it is about another subject.--MaoGo (talk) 12:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * OK, no more about the Venezuela issue on this page. Notrium (talk) 15:57, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Another thing about Venezuela
When you say you want actual wordings in the article, as they were as a whole, you mean you want entire sentences instead of the diff-structure I gave? I think it would be more tidy if I just put link to specific articles/sections, would you like that? Notrium (talk) 11:55, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

BTW, the diff-structures (the three of them) I already provided do reference the state from before my edits. Notrium (talk) 11:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * yes. Either link to the edits or copying the phrases would be ok. If you prefer I may do it.--MaoGo (talk) 12:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Please do it if you have time, as I am still not sure what exactly do you want (because the phrases that you ask me to copy are already there, right above your first comment). Notrium (talk) 15:57, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

2018-2019 Haitian protests
Could you explain why you don't want to include the July 2018, Oct 2018, Nov 2018 protests (all related to PetroCaribe) in the page and why you didn't seek consensus to rename the page? Please feel free to add information to the page rather than making your only work on the page be renaming other people's work. I will be very happy if you add *substance* to the page. 🌿  SashiRolls t ·  c 18:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

RE: Map request
-Please I am interested in that Map Request, regards, Naturista2018 (talk) 07:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * have a properous 2020. Thanks for answering the request. For the moment, we just need a map (or two maps if your prefer) of the Americas and Europe (you may use a world map if you prefer) with the countries of the ICG highlighted.--MaoGo (talk) 10:07, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Human rights in Venezuela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IACHR ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Human_rights_in_Venezuela check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Human_rights_in_Venezuela?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juan Guaidó, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Nacional ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Juan_Guaid%C3%B3 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Juan_Guaid%C3%B3?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Article on March 2020 indictment of Nicolás Maduro by the United States
Hi, because of the news that we heard 3 days ago. Is it possible for us and with other Wikipedians to create an article regarding the 2020 indictment of Nicolás Maduro and 4 others. I will try to find sources in order to build the article. You are invited to contribute in this page: User:Cyfraw/Indictment of Nicolás Maduro. I will include the background, the events plus the reactions. Thank you --cyrfaw (talk ) 18:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Bloqueo
Hola amigo, he incluido en el artículo de la pandemia en Venezuela una referencia al diario Tal Cual donde el Fiscal habla de los efectos del bloqueo en la lucha contra el coronavirus, pero la eliminaste Eso entiendo. Disculpa si no es así. Qué ha pasado? Qué hice mal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.249.176.139 (talk) 22:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hola, ya hay secciones del artículo que hablan sobre las sanciones, veo redundante añadir más sobre ello. Por otro lado tu edición no explica de qué bloqueo se habla ni atribuye ese hecho a Tarek como dice en la fuente. Ten en cuenta que las sanciones no influyen sobre la compra de material médico así que mejor evitar estos enunciados políticos en la introducción.--ReyHahn (talk) 10:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Hola de nuevo. Cierto, ya hay secciones en el artículo que hablan de eso, pero no en la introducción, lo cual se considera importante. Sobre el punto de que no referí que fue el Fiscal General el que da la información, es cierto, pero es que no vi en la introducción que se dijera fuente de nada en el texto. Fíjate, allí no se dice que es Bloomberg quien dice todo lo expuesto, ni se da el nombre de los periodistas de Bloomberg. Esta solamente la referencia al pie de página. Son enunciados enteramente valorativos sobre la situación en Venezuela. Sobre tu valoración de que le bloqueo no influye en equipos médicos también lo considero un juicio de valor, hay varias fuentes que lo refieren. Podría reconsiderar todo al supresión o indicarme la mejor firma de incluir en la introducción los efectos del bloque de Estados Unidos sin herir suceptibilidades? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.249.176.139 (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Puedes abrir una discusión en el talk del artículo preguntando si las sanciones deberían estar incluidas en la introducción.--ReyHahn (talk) 15:56, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

"Alleged" existence of Strategic Committee
Hi ReyHahn. You have removed information regarding the Strategic Committee from the lead implying that its existence is "alleged". However, it has been directly confirmed by JJ Rendón himself (if in doubt, please consult the sources). Could you please reintroduce the content? Thank you. BeŻet (talk) 12:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * sure but has it been confirmed by Guaido officially? Also what's the point of having that on the lead? --ReyHahn (talk) 12:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Why does it need to be confirmed by Guaido specifically? A high ranking official has confirmed its existence which is confirmed by several reliable sources, therefore your argumentation is rendered invalid. The last paragraph in the lead explains his political activities, and him attempting to remove Maduro is quite a significant aspect of said activities. BeŻet (talk) 12:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I just undid the edit. Please continue discussion in the article.--ReyHahn (talk) 12:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

General sanctions for Covid-19
Doug Weller talk 14:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Gideon. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 14:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * sorry for all the trouble, I just copied a section from Biblical and Quranic narratives, similar stuff is also found in Talut, but I understand if you prefer that information out due to lack of references. Maybe you should revisit Biblical and Quranic narratives.--ReyHahn (talk) 20:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I just did. At the top it says "This article uncritically uses texts from within a religion or faith system without referring to secondary sources that critically analyze them. Please help improve this article by adding references to reliable secondary sources, with multiple points of view." It's a terrible article, an example of what not to do. I've just removed one of the few sources as it was from a website of the Cooperative Office for Dawah in Rawdah, it considers neither sunnis nor shiites to be true muslims. And notified various wikiprojects. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.  Doug Weller  talk 14:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Edit war warning at Macuto Bay raid
Please do not edit war, as you did with two edits:  19:49, 26 May 2020 and 20:40, 26 May 2020, which are less than 1 hour apart. --David Tornheim (talk) 20:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * be reasonable, we should not support this kind of vague prose . There is nothing that encourage me against reverting this kind of behaviour with one hour of difference, specially if I a am invoking a guideline .--ReyHahn (talk) 20:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Hi! I noticed that you started a sockpuppet investigation not long ago. I wanted to clarify that per the privacy policy, checkusers are not used with IPs and their blocks proceed with behavior analysis.

Please let me know if you need help in case you're thinking about starting a checkuser request or investigation; there has been a chronic problem with sockpuppets in Venezuela related topics. You can check Apollo The Logician's archive as reference.

Cheers! Take care! --Jamez42 (talk) 15:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * thanks for offering advice. I think I indeed move to soon on that investigation. Also great archive! It just seemed weird that with all of the accusing IPs that political events receive from time to time, this one signed and linked two events from two different years. I wanted to ask you, do you know what is the WP:AN/I for Spanish Wikipedia?--ReyHahn (talk) 15:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * I'll be alert :) There are indeed several IPs that jump from time to time to make political commentaries, but if you ask me it's easier to determine this conduct if there starts to be edit warring or disruptive editing. The use of both proxies or dynamic IPs as well as editing in articles where a previously blocked user has been are also hints of sockpuppeteering, but since behavior patterns can be changed this can go under the radar.


 * The closest equivalent of WP:AN/I in the Spanish Wikipedia probably is Miscelánea (Wikipedia:Tablón de anuncios de los bibliotecarios/Portal/Archivo/Miscelánea). --Jamez42 (talk) 15:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic
I wanted to let you know that I translated the information regarding misinformation of the COVID-19 pandemic in Venezuela and added it to the Misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic article, in case you wanna take a look at it. Cheers! --Jamez42 (talk) 18:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * you read my mind, I was going to do that, thanks! We can do the same in Spanish.--ReyHahn (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Gladly, let me know if you need a hand :) --Jamez42 (talk) 18:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I just noticed that you said that you translated the information? The information was already available in English in the English article. At least the wording will be slightly different.--ReyHahn (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, my bad. I've been wanting to do it for some quite some time now and I didn't notice. I guess I'll see later which information is missing. --Jamez42 (talk) 23:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

United States involvement
For the record, I don't want to give the wrong impression that the dissapointment and frustration expressed in the talk page of the article is directed towards you. On the contrary, I want to stress how valuable your contributions have been in both this article and in other ones.

That being said, do you believe that the POV tag should stay or not? I imagine that for that to happen, the section should be split first. --Jamez42 (talk) 23:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * thanks. I get it now, do not worry. I think that the POV tag should be there as long as there is a conflict. If the page is not reverted back, a POV tag should be added. If the page is reverted to the previous version (Venezuela just under accusations), then I do not see the point of the POV tag. Either way, the best would be to find a consensus on what is an "involvement" so we can write about it precisely. --ReyHahn (talk) 23:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Excellent, many thanks :) Sorry for any mix ups! --Jamez42 (talk) 23:55, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * and  This discussion about your opinions on the POV tag and accusations section should be on the talk page, not here.  --David Tornheim (talk) 06:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


 * This is a personal conversation. I'm asking about ReyHahn's views and explaining mine, from which the latter is particularly important to avoid animosity. There's no need to link this section in the article's talk page. --Jamez42 (talk) 11:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Warning for edit-warring on talk page
Please do not edit-war, especially on a talkpage. This is a second warning for edit-warring. Please stop. --David Tornheim (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * please provide a better argument next time and do not compare unrelated edits.--ReyHahn (talk) 07:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Also Arguments to avoid in edit wars.--ReyHahn (talk) 07:56, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pauli equation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Pauli_equation check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Pauli_equation?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Jamez42 (talk) 18:36, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Your closure of WP:RSN
Hi ReyHahn, I do not think your closing statement in is representative of the consensus in the discussion. You closed with a conclusion of "Attribution needed" and stated that "Most users agree on how The Red Pill Movie is just a documentary film that is not subject to any quality or reliability standards in the information presented", while most commenters in the RfC stated that The Red Pill (2016) is "Not reliable" because it is equivalent to a self-published source.

Could you please explain how you arrived at the conclusion you expressed in your closing statement? —  Newslinger  talk   07:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Read my closing statement. I think we can both agree that The Red Pill Movie cannot be catalogued as a reliable source on its own per the comments provided. On the the other hand I did not get from your opening statement that you wanted to disprove the content of the film altogether. I count a handful of users that label it Not reliable yet commented that it can be used for attributed opinions, this seems like the best compromise as it allows users to cite the content inside it if necessary. Most users that dismissed the source altogether did not provide many examples of misinformation, mostly arguments against the format of the source and not the content itself. I may provide more detail in the closing statement on how it is a "self-published source", but for the moment the verdict stands.--ReyHahn (talk) 08:20, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * My RfC statement was: "Is The Red Pill (2016), directed by Cassie Jaye, a reliable source for subjects related to the manosphere or the men's rights movement?" Most editors in the discussion stated that the film is "Not reliable" as a self-published source (a term defined under the WP:SPS policy and the WP:RS/SPS guideline), which answers the question in the RfC statement with "no". Only a minority of editors believed that the film could be used as attributed opinions on its own without needing a citation to a reliable source (via WP:ABOUTSELF, which allows unreliable sources to be used in rare and highly limited cases, but does not make the source reliable). The closing statement ignored the "Not reliable" consensus in favor of a forced-compromise supervote that does not reflect the consensus in the discussion. Could you please rewrite your closing statement to acknowledge that most editors in the discussion stated that the film was "Not reliable", instead of "Attribution needed"? —  Newslinger  talk   08:52, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * do not get the wrong feeling. I am qualifying the sources as "Attribution needed" in the sense that the film cannot be used to prove or disprove a point, I agree that it is equivalent to a self-published source. I agree that the film is subject to WP:SPS and I may accentuate that most users refer to it as not reliable if you wish, but I just want to be sure that others understand that there is a difference between "not reliable" and "inaccurate", the latter has not been proven.--ReyHahn (talk) 09:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, if you could amend your closing statement to emphasize the "Not reliable" aspect of the consensus, I would greatly appreciate it. On the reliable sources noticeboard, "attribution needed" means that a source should be used with in-text attribution usually because the source is biased or opinionated, which is orthogonal to whether it is reliable. In this RfC, most editors stated that the film is "Not reliable", and did not claim that the film is "inaccurate"—a conclusion that should not be drawn from the RfC. Stating "Attribution needed" in the closing summary is okay, as WP:ABOUTSELF sometimes requires attribution, but the RfC statement asked whether it the film is reliable (not whether it is biased), which is why I am asking you to emphasize the reliability aspect of the consensus. —  Newslinger  talk   09:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * check out the amended statement, before we continue.--ReyHahn (talk) 09:39, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Your amended statement looks great. Thank you for being responsive to my concerns, and for reducing the backlog of RfCs in need of closure. —  Newslinger  talk   09:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

RfC result overturned by your edit
Hi ReyHahn, you probably weren't aware that this edit of yours undid the clear result of an RfC on the topic, which you can consult here:. The was debated endlessly but the RfC resolved these disputes. If you think the Maduro page should be changed, you can raise that at the talk page for that article. -Darouet (talk) 22:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:2020 Iran explosions
Hi, I'm currently constructing an article on 2020 explosions in Iran. Please feel free to participate. If you believe it is good enough feel free to move the draft into an article. IvanSidorenko1 (talk) 11:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * sorry, your subject seems to be outside my usual field of interest, try WikiProject Iran.--ReyHahn (talk) 11:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 22:30, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Electric Dipole
Any recommendations on literature to read up on this? I’m extremely interested and noticed you updated some information on the wiki page recently. Seems like there’s not too much info available on this sadly. Anything will help, some very head scratching science there in my opinion. Should be further looked into. Thanks! QuestionMarkAlways (talk) 02:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Douma chemical attack&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 04:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your help desk question
You did not get a response to this question. Did you find the answer? It might be a question that can be answered on WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  19:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I did not get a response, I will try in the VPT, thanks for contacting me.--ReyHahn (talk) 20:38, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Falkland Islanders&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 12:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

2020 Venezuelan National Assembly Delegated Committee election
You didn't took time to compare mi edit to the criteria used in Responses to the Venezuelan presidential crisis. Both are consistent, countries I mentioned (and well sourced) in my edit, are also in the other article. I suggest you to undo your revision or at least double check mine. Undoing-all is very easy, doing a thorough revision, that is not so easy. --Vaspmo (talk) 01:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I would like to remind you first that new talk sections are to be placed in the bottom of the talk page not on top. Secondly next time please discuss this kind of issues in the talk page of the concerned article, it allows other users to participate, would you be ok if we continue the conversation there?. Now about the article, you added several countries but Cuba and Nicaragua were unsourced, and Turkey and China had references, but none discussed it from the perspective of China or Turkey governments, just Parra or Maduro administration tweets. We had agreed on Responses to the Venezuelan presidential crisis that to prove support it must be a direct quote or public statement indicating recognition coming from the foreign government, not from Venezuelan government.--ReyHahn (talk) 06:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:2020 United States racial unrest&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 00:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Hofstadter's butterfly
Hello, and thanks for your work on Wikipedia! I just tagged subject article for clarification. I was uncertain what the missing noun might be. It seems you might be someone who could fix it. Thanks! --LilHelpa (talk) 19:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * please next time just ping me in the talk page of the article. About your template, I think it is well explained by the mathematical definition above but I will reword it.--ReyHahn (talk) 05:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:White House COVID-19 outbreak&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 09:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weyl equation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helicity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

ELKO spinor
I'd like to tell you about ELKO spinor. I've started writing that page under Draft:ELKO Theory and there is also another page called Draft:Mass dimension one fermions that gives general background. However, there were/are a few problems. The biggest is that ELKO claims to be a new relativistic wave equation that has been overlooked for almost 100 years; it is a twisted form of Dirac/Majorana. It is hard to believe such a claim, and that it is not due to some sign error. It is not reassuring that most/all ELKO literature is sloppy. So I am very carefully checking everything. I started by expanding charge conjugation, making sure it is 100% textbook compatible, and verifying all signs and equations. Next, I added charge conjugation to Dirac equation again verifying all signs and equations. Then, to verify Lorentz covariance, I had to update Lorentz group. Yesterday, I added the Lorentz covariance section to Weyl equation, carefully checking all signs against the other articles, so that they are all consistent. This week, I hope to finish edits to Majorana equation, which, if all goes well, should finally make it clear exactly what ELKO is ... or isn't... with all equations, signs and definitions fully compatible across this range of articles (and compatible with all textbooks and articles I have access to.) So far, I have only checked the classical theory, the classical solutions. The quantum operators have additional minus signs and complex conjugates and etc. floating around, so that will need a second pass to get all definitions fully consistent. If you are interested, I invite you to help, to double-check, to expand this cluster of articles. (I will post this remark to WP:Physics too). 67.198.37.16 (talk) 18:59, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 14:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:2020 Ganja missile attacks&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 22:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Joe Biden and &#32; Talk:Great Wall of China on "Politics, government, and law" request for comments. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 05:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 01:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leonard Mandel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Communist Party of Greece&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 22:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Gliese 1061&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 00:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Inertial frame of reference&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aleksei Pogorelov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stalin Prize.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi ReyHahn. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed,Rosguill talk 18:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello ,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our  Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but  there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software. Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Malassezia&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 11:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Linux&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 04:30, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

--NoonIcarus (talk) 22:23, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 19:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 17:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Climate change in the United States&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 20:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 16:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022
Hello ,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently Special:ListUsers/patroller New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022
Hello ,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.
 * Backlog status

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.
 * Backlog drive

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
 * TIP – New school articles

There is a new template available,, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
 * Misc

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.


 * Reminders
 * Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
 * If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing on their talk page.
 * If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
 * To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
 * Notes

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!
(t &#183; c)  buidhe  20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Webb's First Deep Field&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 00:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022
Hello ,

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators and, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
 * Backlog status

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.


 * Coordination: and  have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out.  will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.


 * Open letter to the WMF: The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.


 * TIP - Reviewing by subject: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.


 * New reviewers: The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.


 * Reminders
 * Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
 * If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing on their talk page.
 * If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
 * To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message
Hi ,

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.
 * Invitation

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Board of Trustees election
Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 04:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Links to user pages and sandboxes
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at List of quantum logic gates. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 13:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand completely. It must have been an error or copy-pasting/moving the page to the mainspace.--ReyHahn (talk) 13:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:/e/ (operating system)&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 00:30, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Land&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 06:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive
(t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

All the Thanks
Every time I make a mistake and someone corrects me, I feel a need to say thank you. It's part of the process of keeping true to knowledge-hoarding, and a safeguard against bad feelings. I think I have thanked you maybe between 3 and 5 times now for this reason (which is A LOT imho). If you consider it spam, I could stop with that :) Otherwise, have a wonderful day! · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 11:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * no problem, you have also corrected many of my mistakes, so thank you too! The Quantum logic gate article is looking awesome.--ReyHahn (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Pictures of Observatorio Naval Cagigal
Hi there -- I noticed you are on the WikiProject Venezuela and seem active. Do you live in or near Caracas? I am trying to find someone who can get a better photo of the Observatorio Naval Cagigal, here's a link to the map location:

If you or someone you know has a camera and is able to get some pictures, that'd be great -- if not, do you have any suggestions as to where else I should ask? Cheers!  M r A urelius R  Talk! 04:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * better leave a message at WP:WikiProject Venezuela.--ReyHahn (talk) 11:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden age (metaphor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Relativity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:ISO 2848&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 19:32, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 08:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Liberian Civil Wars (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Liberian Civil Wars (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Estimated percent of households with guns by country&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 22:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 16:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Northeastern University&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 05:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol needs your help!
Hello , The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by using  at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Charles III requested move discussion
There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place
Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Tornadoes of 2022&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 21:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)