User talk:ReyHahn/Archive 2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Einstein versus Oppenheimer (August 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Einstein versus Oppenheimer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Einstein_versus_Oppenheimer Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Einstein_versus_Oppenheimer reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Comment
I saw that your !vote was removed during the attempts to organize the discussion and I'm sorry for that, but please trust the process. You did the right thing by placing it back again and hopefully things are more smooth moving forward. WMrapids (talk) 22:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 12:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter
Hello ,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Talk page size
I've worked on archiving away stale or finished topics, so that hopefully now you can just scroll through Talk:Operation Gideon (2020) to see if there's any area you need to opine on. I'm loathe to ping people to discussions, and prefer to keep the talk page to active topics, but will continue to ping you if that's what is easier for you. Regards, Sandy Georgia (Talk)  20:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Please, continue to ping me if you need some quick feedback. Unfortunately I am unable to dig very deep into the sources right now. I will try to be more reactive starting next week.--ReyHahn (talk) 09:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your name
Is your name related to the Persian word for basil? —Anomalocaris (talk) 18:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * No, but it is a nice coincidence!.--ReyHahn (talk) 09:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chandrasekhar–Eddington dispute has been accepted
 Chandrasekhar–Eddington dispute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Chandrasekhar%E2%80%93Eddington_dispute help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! StarryGrandma (talk) 18:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * This is an absolutely lovely article. Thank you. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

attosecond spectroscopy
I love you heart TheRealBalalaikaMaster (talk) 02:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 01:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Borde-Guth-Vilenkin theorem
Hi! I found that article from its discussion in one of Aron Ra's recent videos. If you look closely, a testimony from Vilenkin that flat empty space is consistent in eternity is a part of the article itself, in its "Consistency" section. So maybe it's worth reinstating the reference, as this is an omission of valuable relevant info? Strecosaurus (talk) 22:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

https://callidusphilo.blogspot.com/2021/04/cosmology.html (ctrl+f "Rube Goldberg") also gives an informal and accessible explanation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strecosaurus (talk • contribs) 22:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Pinging (sorry I only noticed the request to not mention specific edits on your talk page now, oops... well I can't erase it here..) Strecosaurus (talk) 23:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

But anyway, I'm not a terribly experienced Wikipedian (and I was often voted wrong in edit judgements in the past), so I'll leave the final judgement to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strecosaurus (talk • contribs) 23:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Please please do not spam this talk page. I get really frustrated when we have to discuss details of articles outside the main article. Also do not forget to sign your comments. Let us continue at Talk:Borde–Guth–Vilenkin theorem.--ReyHahn (talk) 08:10, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Interlanguage link template
Hi. I couldn't help but notice your query regarding the interlanguage link template. While this might be a crude solution, you could try adding the language link directly in the source code, such as (de), possibly also using if needed. Best regards. NoonIcarus (talk) 22:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I am actually ok with the current implementation of ill. I was trying to look for a solution for another user who insisted to not use it because of red link (the user appears to not like the additional link to the side either). See then my conclusion and vote at H:FOREIGNLINK's talk page.--ReyHahn (talk) 07:15, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Just reading through the discussion, many thanks. I don't feel too invested on the issue, but I'll try to weigh in later. Thanks once again and happy editing, --NoonIcarus (talk) 08:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Proforma, I never objected to the redlink, I objected to it being editor friendly and user unfriendly, particularly the [de ], but nobody wanted to listen and kept deciding that I said something else, so I gave up. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of experiments in physics has been accepted
 List of experiments in physics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=List_of_experiments_in_physics help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Francis Perrin (physicist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quantum Cheshire cat has been accepted
 Quantum Cheshire cat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Quantum_Cheshire_cat help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Quantum Cheshire cat
Hello, ReyHahn,

Thank you for creating Quantum Cheshire cat.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Needs to resolve tags. Good job."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 11:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

$$S_{ba}$$ in Wu-Yang dictionary
Hi ReyHahn,

I'm afraid, it escaped your notice that $$S_{ba}$$  is explained  in TABLE 1 of the original paper. There stands "(see Sec. V)", since there Sec. V. contains the definition and the name of $$S_{ba}$$. Here we don't have "Sec. V", that's why I wrote the name of $$S_{ba}$$ directly into the table. If you want to stick as strictly as possible to the original format, then please consider to write here "(see above)", or something like this. A letter without any explanation makes no sense!

Cheers, 2A02:AB88:2A82:CD80:D525:C7C2:821A:71DE (talk) 18:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Please discuss at Talk:Wu–Yang dictionary.--ReyHahn (talk) 18:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Done.2A02:AB88:2A82:CD80:D525:C7C2:821A:71DE (talk) 19:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Zwanzig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bethesda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:SpaceX Starship&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 16:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)