User talk:Scorpion0422/Archive 13

Sideshow Bob
I'll take a look at it soon. I'll probably be busy tomorrow and Saturday, but hopefully I'll have some comments by Sunday. Zagalejo^^^ 04:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

No content in Category:WikiProject Nintendo articles
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Nintendo articles, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:WikiProject Nintendo articles has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:WikiProject Nintendo articles, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:11, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

List of monarchs of the Muhammad Ali Dynasty
Hi Scorpion0422! The lead of the List of monarchs of the Muhammad Ali Dynasty has been significantly expanded as you requested. Your comments are welcome on the article's FLC page. Regards. BomBom (talk) 12:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Scorpion, forgive the intrusion, but I saw Gimmebot's run today and wondered if there was a reason that you or Matthew didn't promote/archive yesterday (insufficient need, forgetfulness, a different date for FLs, etc.). If you have already discussed this with Gimmetrow, then please forgive my bothering you. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 05:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Neither of us were available or online until after 00:00 UTC. I've done some promoting, but it might be a few days before the bot runs again. Just leave the talkpage as is so as to not stall the bot, though you may add FLC to the actual page if you wish. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It's fine, I was just wondering. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Downy Woodpecker3.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Downy Woodpecker3.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Medalists
Hi Scorpion! Many thanks for your message. I am very happy that you are interested to bring up this list to featured status! So I try to do my best to support you. As you see there is not very much feedback from the WP:Olympics... (I have also added same questions there with no reply) For a long time it looks like that this project defacto do not exist... And yes, I think I can help you, please see this link I think this is want you need? Feel free to ask me if you need anything else. Kind regards and :) Doma-w (talk) 22:37, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I wanted to ask you the same. :) If you want we can try to bring up some more lists to featured status. My problem is still, that my English is not good enough. But I can help with statistics. Kind regards Doma-w (talk) 22:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

World Tag Team Championship
Hey, WWE says that it's ECW gold, so why do you keep removing it. Kala jan  €  ₣  19:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Well it can be defended on Raw and SM but it's actually ECW, remember the talent exchange? Well the title belongs to Morrison and Mizanin, and they're on Ecw, so... It's logical. Kala jan  €  ₣  20:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Harriet Nahanee's death and re Skwxwu7mesh/Squamish
I suggest you read the article on her, although the death-attribution there remains unsourced; but it was current in BC media for a long time and remains an issue for native rights activists and also for anti-Olympics groups; I'll see if there's anything in The Tyee about it (The Tyee is an independent online magazine on BC current affairs. As for the Skwxwu7mesh/Squamish link the mention of the Squamish was already there, it's just the Squamish link goes to the District of Squamish, not the people....and actually "Coast Salish" isn't quite right either, because the Lil'wat are Interior Salish...it may have been easier to make the "West Coast" reference into Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast or to use Northwest Coast art as the pipe/target, though there's also Coast Salish art, but no Interior Salish art or Salish art....Skookum1 (talk) 16:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * In fact, I'll simplify it for you, though it was easy enough to search "Nahanee" at The Tyee - here is one article and here is another which should satisfy the citation for both articles...here is the "Nahanee" search at The Tyee]. I submit it's a valid addition to the Olympics article, and either or both of those can be used for the citation request at Harriet Nahanee.  Me, I've got to have my shower and get ready to go out....Skookum1 (talk) 16:43, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

WP:EL on the List of National Parks article
Good point, I'll place the online doc in the main article. Thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Dweller/me me me me me
There's no drama needed, as essentially no important change is happening, but you should know about this. --Dweller (talk) 13:08, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * On that note, do we need a new FLRC director? — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 22:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I personally don't think that it's necessary to have a new director given the current volume of the process, but maybe leave it to discussion at WT:FLC to determine? — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 23:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Sideshow Bob
Well, as I said, parts of the analysis section need further paraphrasing. There are long phrases taken right from the source, without quotes.

I'll try to take another look at the article soon, and let you know if I have any other suggestions. Zagalejo^^^ 04:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Geez, I think I may have said that before on this page, but congratultions on adding List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates to your list of achievements. Risker (talk) 06:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

New Award

 * Nope, I didn't get the wrong guy. You helped last time and those inputs helped improve the list. Though it didn't make it the first time, your feedback made the second time MUCH easier and helped to address previous concerns! Thanks! — BQZip01 —  talk 21:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * Delivered by The  Helpful  One  for Garden  and  iMatthew  at 23:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Lists
Hi Scorpion! Maybe you have not seen, that I have answered your question on my talk page? But no problem, here is now the answer:

For freestyle skiing: Youngest medalist Yelizaveta Kozhevnikova (18 years and 48 days - Silver 1992 Moguls) and oldest medalist Tatjana Mittermayer (33 years and 197 days - Silver 1998 Moguls). Interesting that both won the same medal in the same event...

For short track speed skating: Youngest medalist Kim Yoon-Mi (13 years and 85 days - Gold 1994 women's 3000 metres relay) and oldest medalist Cathy Turner (31 years, 323 days - Bronze 1994 women's 3000 metres relay). Interesting that both won their medals in the same event in the same year... And also the second oldest medalist Sylvie Daigle (31 years, 88 days) won her medal (silver) in this event...

Please have also a look here. What do you think about the idea to add a column "Notes"? Kind regards Doma-w (talk) 23:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry...
...I had gone out. You pinged? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 04:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Scenes from the Class Struggle in Springfield

 * I don't want to get into an edit war, but I think it's really silly for the episode title reference to be stated twice just so it lines up with WP:LEAD. If it's going to be cited in the "Production" section (which I still think makes no sense), it shouldn't be in the lead. JuJube (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Keating!
Thanks for reviewing the article, it's really appreciated. I've made some changes - please let me know if there's anything else that needs addressing. Cheers, -Shoemoney2night (talk) 23:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Amendment To Be.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Amendment To Be.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikicup and FLC
There seems to be a flurry of over vote-stacking and such because of the Wikicup. Just so you know, here is the discussion. There was a related question at WT:FLC also. Dabomb87 (talk) 05:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Support This article is the best or Oppose Doesn't look good.
 * I think that the !votes to watch for are those that are not accompanied by any actionable comments, such as
 * Also, as you said, the situation is different because you and Matthew are both in the Cup. Hopefully, nothing much will come out of this, although there will probably be a spike in FLCs, as we saw with the FLC contest. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates
nominated List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Have a nice day. AdjustShift (talk) 13:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Dear Scorpion0422, I'm sorry if you find my comment insulting. I don't want to insult anyone. Have a nice day. AdjustShift (talk) 00:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 17:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Snowball (The Simpsons).gif)
Thanks for uploading File:Snowball (The Simpsons).gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Frink.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:Frink.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: "I've seen a policy about this somewhere..."
What I originally planned to do was just change "EXTREMELY" to "extremely" but I didn't remember what policy said that. The rest of what I did then was unrelated to such a policy. Tez kag 72 15:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh no, I didn't feel that. Good work on all the The Simpsons GAs, FAs, FLs, FTs, ya know. Tez kag 72 15:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:3RR
Yeah, I know, thanks for the heads up though. I was thinking of getting it fully protected, since its a edit war over the name.-- TRU    CO   02:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Raging Abe
Hello. In case you haven't noticed, "Raging Abe" got a GA review a few days ago. :) The Le ft orium  21:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure. He has added a reliable source for it now, though. —The Le ft orium  15:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice, I'll take a look tomorrow. —The Le ft orium  15:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Hairy Woodpecker
Looks like a keeper to me - definitely shows that bill/body aspect ratio much clearer than the photos that I am taking exception to (and will very soon move)

Thanks!Vulture19 (talk) 02:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Capitals
Lots of websites use capitals in a way that we don't. For example, many universities will write "there are two main campuses to the University." Simply becasue this is how they write, and is a reasonable style, it doesn't follow that we need to deviate from out house style. Rich Farmbrough, 18:17 31 January 2009 (UTC).

Can one editor nominate two lists around the same time
I have a question about the nominations for list at freatured list. At Featured list candidates/Seinfeld (season 2) somone pointed out that same editor might not place two lists at FLC. Is that corerect? -- Gman 124 talk 19:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Lisa the Drama Queen
Hello, Scorpion. I was wondering if you saw the question I posted on the talk page for the Simpsons episode "Lisa the Drama Queen" and, if so, what you thought about it. I guess I'm asking you first because you're the person who deleted my edit. If you've got the time, I'd appreciate your input. Thanks. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Sideshow Bob
Hey there. I notice the FAC for Sideshow Bob is facing some objections because of prose quality. I'm a big Simpsons fan, and I'd be happy to look at the writing if the current revisions don't work out. (I looked at some of the copyedit being done and some of it seems sketchy.) I can't promise I'll have time before the FAC runs out, but let me know and I'll see what I can do. Good luck! Scartol •  Tok  20:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * For example: made this edit which I feel makes the prose more awkward in spots ("Arrangements were made to have some of the Frasier producers review the original script"), and doesn't revise writing that needs work (I will change "It was written by Ken Keeler, who had been assigned to write an episode featuring Sideshow Bob." to: "When Ken Keeler was assigned to write a Sideshow Bob episode, he was inspired by episodes of Frasier...") Cheers to Risker for taking on the task, but I think the writing still needs a thorough review. I'll see what I can do today.  Scartol  •  Tok  14:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * All done. Hope it helps! Scartol  •  Tok  19:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the woodpecker award. I do indeed have several copyediting barnstars, but of course I never mind getting more. =) However — and I truly hope I don't seem ungrateful — I would really fancy one of those Simpsons barnstars. But the woodpecker box is also lovely. Whichever. Cheers! Scartol  •  Tok  01:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'll be happy to help with Bart Nancy Cartwright. Gimme a week? Scartol  •  Tok  16:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Request
Sure, I'll listen to it in a few minutes. —<font color="#A04652">The <font color="#A00952" >Le <font color="#AD5160">ft <font color="#C15563">orium  19:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Here's the exact quote from Silverman: "It's a great gag (the laser removal of the tattoo) that Rich Moore did in the storyboard. Rich Moore did the board for this episode. He designed Flanders really, because he had a great drawing in the storyboard." So we know for sure that Moore did the design of Flanders, but not if he did it in the storyboard for "Simpsons Roasting on an Open Fire". <font color="#A04652">The <font color="#A00952" >Le <font color="#AD5160">ft <font color="#C15563">orium  19:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Wind power in Romania
The nominator of this article transferred the content to a new article, List of wind farms in Romania. In effect, he/she wants to transfer the FLC to the created article rather than just withdraw. I wasn't sure what to do, so I think you should take care of this. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for fixing the table and adding the Bure image.--Starwars1791 (talk) 03:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Nancy Cartwright
Sure thing. And I don't understand what that's guys point is; the fact that its not stated exactly who the calls were for, might make some people "worry" about her calling them? Ah well. Gran2 19:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * And there we go. IMDb is incredibly confusing when it comes to animated shows. Gran2 14:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It's looking pretty good, although I've not read the book yet, so can't pass too much judgment. Gran2 15:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, for whatever reason it came up, that article mentions nothing of the book. Gran2 16:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

List of Metallica concert tours
See if your FLC requests were fulfilled. igordebraga ≠ 01:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

re: My Life as a 10-Year-Old Boy
Thanks, I will also try to do some more research and possibly add more sources for reception and other bits, if possible. Cirt (talk) 19:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Potential COI
I think this is a good reason why WikiCup participants should declare themselves. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

WT:FLC
Can you place your input on this? Thanks.-- TRU CO   <sup style="color:navy;">503  02:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Treehouse of Horror IV
I noticed that you reverted a user's edits in order to readd some images. However, the user had done a huge clean up and major overhaul of that page, and you removed it all just to restore a minor part. That is called blind reverting, and it is an extremely bad habit to get into. I also suggest you catch up on wikipedia's fair use image policy. Non-free images must add to critical commentary, and none of the images you re-added do that. -- Scorpion <sup style="color:black;">0422  03:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes they did. --Jason Palpatine (talk) 04:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 20:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Australian George Cross recipients
The nominator is not the primary contributor. The primary contributor asked to withdraw the nom for now, but I wasn't sure whether the nom should just be deleted or if it should be archived as per normal procedure. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Image
I'll get to taking a look today or tomorrow. I just found a wealth of free images for numerous musical artists so I'm busy uploading them right now. I'll let you know if I find anything. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 02:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I sent out a request today and I'll let you know if I hear anything. I have several potential candidates, but I'm going to wait a few days in between if the first one doesn't respond. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I added the image to the article, feel free to move it to wherever you think it's most appropriate. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Request sent out. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

List
Dear Scorpion0422, I faced some problems dealing with lists. I'm involved with the DYK process, but for the FL process, I think one needs a more collaborative approach. :-)

What should we do with Featured list removal candidates/List of Nobel Peace Prize laureates? Should we close it? We have to fix some rationales on List of Nobel Peace Prize laureates, but we can fix them. Should we close the FLRC?

Have a nice day. AdjustShift (talk) 16:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Some rationales have to be fixed, but we can fix them. I'll talk to Sephiroth BCR. BTW, your contributions to lists are A++++. I analyzed your contributions to lists, and learned new things about list development. Cheers! :-) AdjustShift (talk) 17:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Can you do me a favour...?
Could you do me a massive favour. I have been working on tweaking the Premiere (The O.C.) to an FAC level. It has had quite a bit of input and Dabomb recommended I get an uninvolved WP:TV member with copy-editing skills and FA experience to give it one last full pass through. Your name sprung to mind and I was wondering if you could do this for me. I am willing to bribe (another of Dabomb's suggestions) and will offer my services to peer review any of your articles, review more FLCs or help you out wherever I can. Please just ask if you ever need something. Many thanks, <b style="color:#E32636;">Rambo's Revenge</b> <b style="color:#FFA500;">(talk)</b>  23:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Matthew has already contributed to the peer reviews (1st and 2nd) so he is familiar with the article. I was advised that a fresh set of eyes would be better. If you have any other suggestions please let me know. <b style="color:#E32636;">Rambo's Revenge</b> <b style="color:#FFA500;">(talk)</b>  00:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

For your fine efforts
I just noticed that Bob is getting the recognition he deserves. (I'd like to use some Sideshow Bob dialogue there, but I can't think of any off the top of my head.) Well done!

Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.
 * Thanks for the fix. Lawshoot! 01:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Do you think this is an exception to the 10 limit rule?
WWE Draft? I plan on adding fields like "first pick, location, date, venue, format, and the addition notes" In addition to expanding the prose substantially.-- < TRU  CO  >  5 0 3 03:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I guess I'll wait until there are 10 items. If it is content forking, then all NFL draft pages should be merged, no?-- < TRU  CO  >  5 0 3 21:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for My Life as a 10-Year-Old Boy
--Dravecky (talk) 04:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Multiple FLCs at a time
I thought I read somewhere that there was a limit to how many FLCs could be nominated per individual or topic at any one time. I was just wondering as I am working on the SPOTY topic presently, and currently submitting the next list after the old one is promoted. I don't mind doing this as it keeps the review backlog down, but I happened to note that currently the Royal Society medals topic has 3 lists at FLC currently. Is that allowed? <b style="color:#E32636;">Rambo's Revenge</b> <b style="color:#FFA500;">(talk)</b>  17:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 23:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

NHL Foundation Player Award
I was wondering if I can nominate this article with you for WP:FLC. I have just re-written the article, and I believe it could definitely be an FL. Message me ASAP. Thanks. -- <font face="Chiller" size="2"> SRE.K.A.L. | L.A.K.ERS ]] 23:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

WP:FL
I think you're missing Golden Globe Award for Best Director – Motion Picture, or is it not on because of the FLRC that's happening? -- <font face="Mistral" size="2"> SRE.K.A.L. | L.A.K.ERS ]] 05:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: List of Simpsons Episodes edits
How come you keep undoing my edits? Is "snpp.com" not a good enough source? It mentions on said site "Treehouse of Horror XX" which, should be the Season 21 THOH episode. The Ultimate Koopa (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Female Nobel laurates
Why did you revert the edits I made on that list? Those images were free, I took them for the pages about the respective winners. Aquila89 (talk) 21:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Because the author is unknown, the photos should not be used? Then they should be removed from the pages about the winners as well. Also, the images about Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin, Betty Williams and Toni Morrison have author information, and I see nothing wrong with their licensing. Aquila89 (talk) 21:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your answers. Aquila89 (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Homer's Barbershop Quartet
I just saw your comments at User_talk:Theleftorium. Do you have that info to add to the article? Gary King ( talk ) 22:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hm okay, I dropped a note to Left. Gary King  ( talk ) 22:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Question
Are you promoting/archiving today? I may be reviewing quite a few FLCs today, but if you aren't, I will let up. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I need to revisit the older FLCs real quick. Hopefully, I can finish in time. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Real life has been busy, and the date arbitration case has sapped most of my Wiki time. I shouldn't be long, there is only a couple FLCs that are ready for pr/ar that I haven't revisited. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * When you read through, it looks like Featured list candidates/List of awards received by Michael Jackson's nominators want to withdraw. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm done, but there are a lot of FLCs that need revisits from other reviewers. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Rufus Wainwright discography
Hello there, and thank you for all of your work you do here on WP, especially with the FL nominations. I was disappointed to see that the Rufus Wainwright discography was denied promotion, even though I had 2 people supporting and 1 opposing only because the album table had 3 too many chart columns and he felt too many sources were used. In NO WAY am I offended or unwilling to make edits to the article, but I was hoping another reviewer would add another point of view on the sources issue. Perhaps I am writing to the wrong person, but I still do not know how the article can be improved, as far as sources go, because the issue was not settled. I guess I will just have to re-submit the article for FL status at a later date. Any advice or suggestions? -Another Believer (talk) 02:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the advice. -Another Believer (talk) 02:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Olympic Games Info Box
Hey, good job on the info box for the Winter Games, I'll post a comment at the Olympic Project talk page as well. I'm wondering if you might have time to generate something similar for the Olympic Games article? User:Tone has suggested it, and I think it's a legit suggestion but I don't have any expertise in that area. I would certainly be indebted to you if you could help out. I don't think it has to include every year of every games but perhaps links to the summer olympics, winter olympics, ancient olympics, youth olympics, and paralympics pages, along with the IOC. I'm not sure what else would be appropriate there. Thanks for any help you could give. H1nkles (talk) 16:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That info box on my talk page is great. If you can add the Olympic flag at the top of the box that would be perfect!  Thanks so much.  H1nkles (talk) 17:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

WP:ER
I know you really don't edit at ER, but can I get your input in this discussion to revamp the process of ER. Thanks.-- TRU  CO   19:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 21:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC) The  Helpful  Bot  21:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

FL limit
I have a question, would List of current champions in Total Nonstop Action Wrestling be an exception to the 10 limit rule?-- Will C  20:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, I was told to ask a director first. Just wanted to make sure. I asked both of you, so after I get a reply from Matthewedwards, I'll decide if I should take it or not.-- Will C  21:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Treehouse of Horror VI and Nancy Cartwright
I just passed Treehouse of Horror VI, nice work! And sure, I'll review Nancy Cartwright; I actually read her book a few years back. As far as my own GANs, everything I've nominated currently has either been reviewed or is being reviewed, but I plan to bring a few nominations forward in the next month or two, so maybe I'll take you up on your offer to review one of mine later. Thanks! --Hunter Kahn (talk) 01:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I reviewed Nancy. I also took the liberty of reviewing Julie Kavner, so please take a look at that one when you can. I've been going crazy with the Simpsons reviews lately; out of about 35 GA reviews I did for the backlog elimination drive so far, about 10 have been Simpsons related. That's got to be worth a medal, or at least a donut or something! lol --Hunter Kahn (talk) 02:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Source fo Olympic hockey medalists
Over at WT:HOCKEY I mentioned I would look for a book that had a source, and thought the IIHF had one. While that book didn't have anything already used, I just found a different book at my university library that has rosters for every Olympic hockey team from 1920 to 1994 (it was printed in 1997). If you want it added as a reference, just let me know and I'll add it. Kaiser matias (talk) 02:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll go ahead and add it then. And the Czech roster is listed as follows: Adolf Dusek, Karel Hartmann, Karel Kotrba, Josef Loos, Vilem Loos, Jan Palous, Jan Peka, Karel Psek-Kada, Josef Sroubek, Otakar Vindys, Karel Walzer. Kaiser matias (talk) 02:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Led Zeppelin
However, Page's quoted defenses against plagarism are included- Why? Especially when they fall short of a full explanation, especially for contemporary, non-blues songs and singers. I think, objectively a "laundry list" would speak for itself. A list of simple original song titles and artists might sufice. I don't expect it to be acceptable to you, but as time goes by I think eventually a full long list will find its way into the article. I don't mind, I can wait. ;) Cuvtixo (talk) 04:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I beleive you really are trying to be evenhanded, I appreciate it. A much better place for musical comparisons was YouTube, but a number of videos that compared songs to various possible sources have been taken down because of music label lawyers complaining of copyright violation (That's irony for you!) Anyways, keep up the good work! Cuvtixo (talk) 04:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

"Boy-Scoutz n the Hood"
Hey Scorpion! The episode "Boy-Scoutz n the Hood" (that I'm working on) is mentioned on page 164 in Nancy Cartwright's book (see here). Could you take a look if it's something worth mentioning in the article? :) <font color="#A04652">The <font color="#A00952" >Le <font color="#AD5160">ft <font color="#C15563">orium  18:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thanks! <font color="#A04652">The <font color="#A00952" >Le <font color="#AD5160">ft <font color="#C15563">orium  18:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

my edits to Marge vs. the Monorail
Thanks for telling me about the various rules that I have violated. I have now added more information to the "Cultural references" section in the article, and I hope that you agree with them! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edp318 (talk • contribs) 00:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Could you please explain why you just overturned my edits?--Edp318 (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, Scorpion0422, I disagree with your decision to revert my edit. In my opinion, the edits I made are not a violation of policy. Therefore, I would like to bring the discussion to the talk page so that we may begin the dispute resolution process as outlined in Dispute resolution. Also, I have recently filled in a blatant gap in your edit, if you don't mind.--Edp318 (talk) 01:06, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Promotions
You promoted the Yankees team record FLC as I commented. I was likely to support anyway, but still... Dabomb87 (talk) 15:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I see that Giants addressed most of my comments. Never mind. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:28, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I was actually addressing them as you were posting to my talk page. Good thing I was on here at the time.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 15:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Good timing. Scorpion, are you doing another round of promotions today? I just capped/supported at your FLC. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

FAC: Premiere (The O.C.)
Hi, I was just wondering would it be possible for you to comment on a featured article candidacy for Premiere (The O.C.). I am asking as it has been open for over two weeks but is short on reviews and I know you took a look at the article during its peer review. Many thanks, <b style="color:#E32636;">Rambo's Revenge</b> <b style="color:#FFA500;">(talk)</b>  16:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 18:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC) The  Helpful  Bot  18:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)