User talk:Stfg/Archive 6

Your GA nomination of Threni (Stravinsky)
The article Threni (Stravinsky) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Threni (Stravinsky) for things which need to be addressed. GoP T C N 12:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Threni (Stravinsky)
The article Threni (Stravinsky) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Threni (Stravinsky) for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? GoP T C N 18:52, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your contributions to the project so far. You are a great editor. -- S M S  Talk 15:25, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the kind message, SMS. I appreciate it. --Stfg (talk) 16:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you, TopGun. I will, of course, be keeping away from any contentious topics during the Mediation, which I do hope will be productive and which I don't want to risk disrupting, but the article remains on my watchlist. Keep well, --Stfg (talk) 09:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I read your discussion with JCAla above, will not barge in there to keep one of those debates away from your page, but do appreciate the way you've dealt with it. Let's hope the mediation resolves the thing. -- lTopGunl (talk) 23:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Wrap-up newsletter draft is ready
Hi, Stfg. Just a note to let you know that I have a newsletter draft prepared—if you have a minute to check it over that would be super. Thanks. -- Dianna (talk) 23:07, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Dianna. Yes, that looks good. I've also checked over the election page and changed the number of assistant positions back to three, which is what it was last time. If reducing it to two was intentional, by all means revert that, and I'll be happy. Best, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yah, twas intentional. We don't have enough work for four people. Two and a spare is enough. If we increase the scope of the project or find I was wrong, we can up it back next time or at any time. I will send out the newsletter now. Thanks for checking stuff over. -- Dianna (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Initial program for figuring out drive barnstars completed
Hi. I have an initial version of the program for figuring out GOCE drive barnstars completed. A copy of the program itself is at User:Allens/GOCE/GOCE.barnstars1.pl (in Perl); a copy of its output for the May drive is at User:Allens/GOCE/GOCE.barnstars1.pl.output1 (except that there will be a "*" in front of the "10k articles(s)" line - minor formatting bug...). It doesn't do quite everything (figuring up who did the most articles the first day is not possible just looking at the after-drive info), but it's pretty close. I'm continuing to work on the program - I'd like it to produce: Either a drive coordinator can run the program if the person happens to have a Mac or other Unix/Linux machine (or can figure out how to do it on a Windoze machine - it's possible, but I have no idea how to do it), or I can run it after the next drive. Allens (talk &#124; contribs) 23:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Preliminary drafts of the barnstars that could then be modified to be more personalized;
 * Info on number of articles reviewed (both how many articles done by a person were reviewed, and how many articles each reviewer checked); and
 * Total number of articles and number of words processed.


 * Wow, Allen, that's really fabulous! I see that the program has even gone to people's article listings and has generated a corrected leaderboard, so I'll be able to return and issue a couple more barnstars that were earned but not spotted when I did it. This is a real asset, not only for saving work, but especially for avoiding human error. A million thanks for this. My pooter is Windows, but if you wouldn't mind running it after the next drive, that would be wonderful.


 * For preliminary drafts of the barnstars, I have a set of substs that I currently use to generate them (manually) here and this is the template I use to generate the message for most of them, although I doubt that will be any use to you.


 * Please keep an eye on your email. Something is on its way later today. Cheers, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 09:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Tammar copyedit
Hello. Would you be able to did a quick look-though and possible copyedit. I want to make it absolutely sure the is good enough and another copyeditor may do the job. LittleJerry (talk) 00:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi. Well, I checked the first part of it 4 days ago at Rumiton's invitation, and came to the conclusion that he had done as good a job on it as I could have. I see you and he are still collaborating on it via his talk page. I wouldn't normally go over a fellow copy editor like that unless there was a problem. Do you see a problem? --Stfg (talk) 10:20, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

GOCE incentives
Hi Simon (?) We said we would discuss incentives after the drive. Could you set the ball rolling by starting a new section on the most suitable page please? I have just discovered I have been missing some discussions by not having a certain page on my watchlist. Recently the discussions have been spread over several pages. Do we need to make it clearer where we expect various discussions to take place? Regards and thank you for your patient and polite handling of some editors. --Greenmaven (talk) 13:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Jack. I'm hosting a dinner today, and very busy. It's a good point about having so many talk pages. I'll have a think about that. I should think our main talk page would do fine to discuss drive incentives. If you wanted to start something today, go ahead, otherwise I'll do so tomorrow. Thanks, and best regards, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 14:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * {talk page watcher} Hi, Jack. The main pages to watchlist permanently are the main GOCE page; the bimonthly drive pages; the coordinators talk page; and the semiannual election pages. That way you will be unlikely to miss anything of interest. Unfortunately, advice given to users about where to hold discussions would likely be in vain. Regards -- Dianna (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Diannaa and Simon. I will track down all the pages you mention; I think I still am not watching some. I will not be editing for a few hours, so I will think some and leave Simon to initiate the discussion – it's probably more appropriate to have it opened by a coordinator. I would have begun by coming up with a list of the issues I could think of as a framework, which others could then add to, to try to bring some orderliness to the debate. --Greenmaven (talk) 22:46, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, I've started something here. In addition to the talk pages Dianna mentioned, the Requests talk page gets quite a bit of traffic. Others are seldom used. I guess the best choice for any new section can be made by considering who would be likely to watch the talk page you choose. But, as Dianna says, people may follow other logic ;) --Stfg (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: Tay-Sachs GOCE request
From the looks of the edit history, Allens's copyedit appeared to be complete; the fact that he then nommed it for GAN tells me this. Uploadvirus's ce was only partial but came before the other one, so it seemed to be to be complete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * (The above copied back to Wizardman's talk page, where I replied.) --Stfg (talk) 15:46, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Mysore copyedit
Hi! Thank you so much for copyediting the article Mysore. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Welcome! --Stfg (talk) 17:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I am trying to address the issues raised by you in the talk page. I made changes in the media section already. (I retained the names of English language "national" dailies though).
 * Addressing the issue in tourism may be more problematic. If you have time, can you please suggest a way? Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Re-adding the dailies as being available is fine. The tourism one is difficult. Tomorrow I'll have a look at some other city and coutry FAs and see how they do it. Please keep this watchlisted for now. --Stfg (talk) 19:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Tourism has always been a difficult topic! Some city articles do not have separate tourism section, which I personally prefer. However, tourism being a big thing in this relatively smaller city (it is a major source of economy of the city), I would tend to keep the section.
 * Another copyeditor from the League of Copyeditors asked why we are not mentioning national parks, parks etc in or near the city (the copyeditor by mistake did not notice the Tourism section). I told the copyeditor that those have been mentioned under "Tourism" section. That was ok with him/her. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:59, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * We agree. By the way, I don't object to having a tourism section. It was just a comment on how it's written. But I've had a look at one or two city and country FAs, and those that have a tourism section tend to have the same problem at least to some extent. So I've withdrawn that comment.


 * About the newspapers: I don't think the Kannada-language papers are any less notable that the English-language ones. But why have a list of papers that are merely available there, but not published there? Every city in the world has national papers available in them. This is the sort of information one might want in a tourist guidebook, but why in an encyclopedia? Remember WP:NOTTRAVEL. --Stfg (talk) 10:19, 8 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree with you. I have changed the sentence. It now reads, "Many local newspapers are published in Mysore and carry news mostly related to the city and its surroundings, while national and regional dailies in English and Kannada are available, as in the other parts of the state." Please have a look. Is it a comma too many?--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:03, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Excellent. The commas are good, but I changed "and" to "while". It's advisable to reserve "while" for strong contrast and things happening at the same time. User:Dank advises "if and works, then while doesn't". It's a good guideline --Stfg (talk) 14:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow! That is an excellent advice. I will remember that. I've always had problem with "while"! Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:34, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * One request. In case you feel that the prose is ok/acceptable/good, can you please state that in the FAR of Mysore? This will help the FA delegate in determining the status of the article. Your help is GREATLY appreciated. Thanks.--Dwaipayan (talk) 01:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the delayed reply -- I seem to have overlooked this. After copy editing articles I generally avoid stating overall assessments on their review pages, because if I do it for one and not for another, it might cause resentment in the latter case. I do have the page and the FAR watchlisted, and will be happy to copy edit any insertions that need it and to participate in discussion of details of the prose if they arise. The fact that I placed a GOCE tag on the talk page implies that I stand by the quality of the prose. You're welcome to add an "Update 7" to the FAR page to mention it, if you wish. Kind regards, --Stfg (talk) 10:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Moving discussion of Dodo to talk page
Did I do the right thing by moving the discussion to the Requests talk page? Or would the article's talk page have been more appropriate? ʝungle jill  12:42, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Junglejill. Thanks for asking, and thanks for moving it. It was a great help. Probably another time it would be better on the article's talk page, because whatever is on our talk page will get archived, and then people interested in the article may overlook it. That said, it's certainly causing no trouble where you've put it, and I wouldn't bother to move it again unless you prefer to. Thanks for joining in our work -- I noticed what good quality editing you do, and we really need that. Kind regards, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 13:47, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Well-Deserved Recognition!
Hey Simon - no doubt whatsoever that you deserve this ... With very best regards: Cliff (a/k/a &#34;Uploadvirus&#34;) (talk) 12:51, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks Cliff, that's really nice of you and greatly appreciated. Kind regards, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * My pleasure, my friend. Let's be sure to collaborate on the next drive. Tell you what - I'm making you a personal pledge of doing 50,000 words MINIMUM on the next one :-O In the meantime, take care.
 * Best:Cliff (a/k/a &#34;Uploadvirus&#34;) (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Common eland
Hi, and thanks. Well, not only WLU and Keilana, Peter Coxhead and Stemonitis helped too (so much teamwork, you know). And do go on to archive it! :) -- Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Talk all words 11:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * And yourself, of course. Thanks. --Stfg (talk) 13:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Do you have time to look at this guy? User talk:Seaeffel
He seems to be out of control, has moved at least three articles, and is a brand new editor. He has ruffled feathers at Bob Brown (Australian Green politician) by moving it from Bob Brown. Regards --Greenmaven (talk) 09:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

I am contacting you because it is daytime with you and this editor may deserve blocking. --Greenmaven (talk) 09:31, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see. I think you need to ask an admin. I'm not one, and have no powers to block. I don't really get too much into issues of user conduct, since there's not much I can do about it. Sorry. --Stfg (talk) 09:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you, Vaibhav. I've been watching the article ever since the copy edit, as I hope it will become FA one day. Kind regards, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 09:36, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hope so. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 09:37, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

GOCE
Did you start the June-July drive yet? Thanks, Electriccatfish2 (talk) 23:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC).
 * The July drive is open for signing up at WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/July 2012, but it hasn't started yet. Allens (talk &#124; contribs) 23:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Allen. Looking forward to seeing you there, Electriccatfish2. --Stfg (talk) 10:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Juan Medina nominated for deletion
Recently the article Juan Medina have been nominated for deletion. Since this article have already been copyedited by you about one month ago, I think that if you, as coordinator from the Guild of Copyeditors, may notice the article being not notable enough, you would nominated yourself for deletion. My question is, what should I do with this nomination, since I think have no sense. Oscar 17:39, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Oscar. Thanks for drawing my attention to it. I agree with you and have removed the PROD. I have notified the nominator and have put the necessary template on the talk page. This cancels the PROD and an article cannot be PRODded twice, so you don't need to take any further action, but it would be a good idea to watch the situation, as the nominator may wish to take the article to AfD. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 18:06, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for taking care of it! Oscar 23:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Guidance Request
I'm a new editor and I'm looking for some guidance with my first efforts in advance of the July drive. I'd like someone to check some of the edits I made on botnet. I started editing but stopped due to the many content and reference issues (I didn't add a "reviewed" tag, because I'm new at this). However, I think I did enough to get some feedback. I'm contacting you because you're on the reviewing group for the drive. If there's someone better suited to help me, could you point me in the right direction? If you're willing help, could I ask you a few more specific questions? Thanks. Dante brevity (talk) 01:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for coming here. Yes, I'll be glad to help. I've replied on your talk page, and it may be best for you if we continue there. --Stfg (talk) 10:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

New drive signup method
I've made some more changes. Go here and see what you think. The only possible problem now is that it uses large headers for each person, but you can see that by changing the Participants to a top top-level header (just one =), it will look right in the table of contents. If we keep that all at the bottom, it should work. We can just move the reviewers list above the participants. I'm going to see if there is a way to control the section size though. —Torchiest talkedits 20:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah yes, that's great. The main user difficulty we needed to solve was that some editors were getting confused about where to put their entries in the Totals section. This solves that. I'm quite happy to move the reviewers above the participants to achieve that. (Would you be OK with making it Totals, by the way?)


 * Section headers can skip levels and the TOC will still look fine. The current page does that, in fact. Take a look at User:Stfg/Sandbox1, which shows level-2 sections with level-4 and level-5 subsections. So long as all children of a given parent are at the same level, it works. Or am I misunderstanding the problem? --Stfg (talk) 21:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I just realize I neglected to reply to this earlier. The problem is actually the inverse of what you've got in your test page.  The button can't make level 4 or 5 headers, as far as I know.  So the only way to have them all show up as sub-sections of the Totals section in the TOC is to make Totals a level-1 header, i.e. =Totals=. —Torchiest talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 00:55, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Just passing through
Hey Simon, hope you're doing well. I just dropped by to congratulate you on becoming the GOCE's lead coordinator. I know you'll do great! :) The Utahraptor Talk/Contribs 02:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Utahraptor! Thanks for the support and good wishes. I hope all is well with you? --Stfg (talk) 08:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Yeah, things are going well on my end. The Utahraptor Talk/Contribs 00:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Bangladesh at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games
Since it will most probably be listed as a GA in some days, do you think this can be a FA after some tweaking? ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:46, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * You certainly have the abilities needed to get an article to FA, but are you very keen for it to be this one? The difficulty is in the topic, which is rather narrow for making an article that can tell an engaging story. If you could find some sources that support human-interest background stories, and some pictures, it might be feasible, otherwise I'm not sure. If you really want to go with this one, I suggest doing what you can to enhance it, then have me do another copy edit (directly, don't bother putting it on the queue), and then take it to Peer Review. --Stfg (talk) 14:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the scope is very less. I will see if I can add some more content. Cheers! ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 16:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Three dots in a title?
Hello. When there are three dots in a title, for example on Dance Again... the Hits, should there be a space between them and the next word? Additionally, in that title, should "the" be capitalized? Thank you, <font face="Arial" size="2em"> Statυs (talk) 01:59, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes and no, in that order. :) <B>—Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 02:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your response. <font face="Arial" size="2em"> Statυs (talk) 02:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Normally, three dots also have a space in front of them (see MOS:ELLIPSES). But neither of the two Featured Articles that have such dots (0.999... and These Are the Voyages...) do this in the title, so it's probably best not to change your title. --Stfg (talk) 09:53, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Help in moving an article
Hi. I recently made an article (a biography) entitled Scott Xavier but the moving from my sandbox to the article site encountered some problems. It says "The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid." However, when I search for "Scott Xavier," the article does not exist or that there's still no such page existing. Kindly help. Thanks! Rodwinoloresisimo (talk) 07:19, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Looking at the history, you seem to have done it before you came here, but then moved it to "Xavier Scott", so that "Scott Xavier" is now a redirect. Which of these is his real name? --Stfg (talk) 13:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

c/e nomination
Facepalm. My bad on putting it on the wrong place. :) Jhenderson  7 7 7  18:06, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem, it was easy to fix. :) Keep well, --Stfg (talk) 20:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

RE:Harald Aabrekk
Great, Thank you! Mentoz86 (talk) 13:30, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Welcome! --Stfg (talk) 13:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Regarding Chuck Fager
I have left a message here for Diannaa. I would also be interested in your thoughts. Regards --Greenmaven (talk) 04:46, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Jack, thanks for asking. I agree fully with Dianna. When I encounter a situation like this, I like to look at the editor's userpage, talk page, contribution list and edit count. Here you see an inexperienced user whose talk page already indicates misunderstanding of several Wikipedia policies and irritation when told. Dianna's reading of the reason all those tags have appeared feels right to me. He may learn, or may become frustrated and move on. One thing to avoid would being too direct and risking provoking him to become an edit warrior. A gentle explanation of the issues on his talk page might help (or might not, I dunno). I would slightly take issue with one of your edit summaries: "He is known for... This is a true statement if only ten people know it. So, no citation needed." Remember "truth, of itself, is not a substitute for meeting the verifiability requirement" from WP:V. Kind regards, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 09:12, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Got your comments. Best regards. --Greenmaven (talk) 12:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Copy edit requests
Hi Stfg, I noticed that some WikiProjects have sections with articles that need copy editing. See, for example, WikiProject Libraries. Could these be considered requested articles for the purpose of GOCE drives? I suspect many editors don't know about the Guild or that they can request work from us; I didn't until this May, when I joined the last drive. Of course, if such articles are fair game, we can publicize that on the drive page or elsewhere so it doesn't turn out to be an advantage for the knowledgeable few. Thanks for all your work! --BDD (talk) 00:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, maybe this doesn't really apply. That link won't work anymore, as I've been cleaning the page and learned that listing was based on old copyedit tags. But as a hypothetical, I'd still be interested to know whether we can count as a request articles listed by a wikiproject as needing copyedit. --BDD (talk) 16:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi BDD. I'm very sorry I overlooked your first message this morning. There's only one orange bar, but it was careless of me. I think we should take these on a case by case basis, in case projects have plans of their own. But if we discover such things, and the project owners want it, and we publicise it for all our folks to see, then I think in principle it would be good to do that. Thanks. --Stfg (talk) 16:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we give those articles copyedit tags ourselves, dated to when the request was first made on the project page, and then post to the project talk page informing them of our request process for future reference. --BDD (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Advertising our requests page on project talk pages is certainly a great idea. We need to make sure that our regular requests don't get swamped by a list generated by just one project, so tagging might in some cases be the most we can afford to offer. But we tend to treat tagged articles a bit more impersonally than requests, and of course tagged articles tend to lie waiting longer than requests. Considerations like this make me feel all the more strongly that we need to consider each specific case on its own merit. --Stfg (talk) 19:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

2005 Women's Cricket World Cup Final
In case you have time, can you copyedit 2005 Women's Cricket World Cup Final? Its on the requests page since May. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Vaibhav. Thanks for asking. I don't normally take direct requests, but I was thinking of taking this one anyway as I know cricket and understand the jargon there. The only thing is, I found quite a lot of fine detail in the article, like someone being caught off a thick edge, which is the kind of jargon that people who don't know it would need quite a long explanation of, and I'd be tempted to prune that kind of thing. We need to avoid match articles reading like newspaper reports or transcripts of radio commentaries. Would you be OK if I thinnned out some of that kind of detail? I'm placing the request on hold with a view to doing another first and then coming to it if you agree. Howzat!? --Stfg (talk) 12:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * For sure! Do whatever you think is right. I can blindly trust you and your pen. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 13:51, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Very risky! Thanks Vaibhav, I should be able to start tomorrow. --Stfg (talk) 14:21, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Sinking of the Titanic
Hi there. Would you mind dropping by the above article and explaining to User:Ranger Steve that the following caption "The iceberg thought to have been hit by Titanic, reported to have been streaked, along its waterline on one side, with red paint from a ship's hull (photographed by the chief steward of the liner Prinz Adelbert on the morning of 15 April 1912)", regardless of how long it is, and how many commas it has, is not a complete sentence, and must therefore not be ended by a period, as per WP:MOS? I am being failed by words again. Tx. Your pedantic brother, Rumiton (talk) 14:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Never mind, thanks. The issue just got more complex. :) Rumiton (talk) 14:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * (ec) Hello my pedantic brother ;) Yes, I see that Ranger Steve has made a new version. I think it's much better and it's MOS-compliant now, isn't it? (P.S. I'm not sure whether it's correct to say "... hit by Titanic" rather than "... hit by the Titanic", but I'll leave that to you.) --Stfg (talk) 15:04, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually no, the caption is now too long and clumsy and contains information that should be in the text. Also the first "sentence" is still not complete. See MOS:CAPTION. Thanks for responding. Rumiton (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * In fact, I might be wrong about that first sentence. I see it says incomplete sentences should be dotted if there is a complete sentence with them. I still think it is way too long though. Rumiton (talk) 15:12, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Can you have a look?
First of all, thank for starting the copy edit on 2005 Women's Cricket World Cup Final, your idea to list the match summaries was brilliant. Since you are brilliant in copyediting, please have a look here. There is a concern regarding the phrasing used in the article, which in my opinion, is misleading. A neutral editor like you can be highly beneficial. Thanks, :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 10:31, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Glad you like the list approach. I won't take a view as to whether that's misleading or not, because I don't think either editor has native-level English, but I've been over there to see if I could suggest something. I'm not going to take a view on what they should say, but if I can help them say what they mean then it's OK.


 * I must say that I went there rather reluctantly, because that's one of the articles that has been mentioned in the ArbCom request, and I don't want to muddy the waters. (I don't want disrupt the mediation either.) You are a very good wikipedian and we need people like you, so it would be a crying shame if your work got spoiled by being dragged on to a battleground where you cannot achieve much. There is a lot of process still to happen on that set of issues and affecting those articles. When all that process is done, then neutral people will be able to go there and make the articles good. That may be later rather than sooner, though. It's up to you what you do, of course, but I hope you won't mind me saying as a friend that I think you'd be better leaving anything to do with that drama well alone for now, and concentrating on the many other things you're good at. Cheers, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 14:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I am not much interested in any more drama discussions till the AbCom finishes it all. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 14:45, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Great! And great that you've sent the cricket one to GAN already. By the way, the Aftermath section mentions how much India got for being runners-up. Do any of the sources mention how much Oz got for winning? It might be good to have that in, if so. --Stfg (talk) 14:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I had an another try but I couldn't it. Since its women cricket, no one gives attention to it. :( ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 15:00, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * However, a major development happened soon after that world cup. The International Women's Cricket Council was merged to the ICC, which resulted to the Women's Cricket Association of India's merge to the BCCI in 2006. Do you think this can be added in the Aftermath section? ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 15:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Is it part of the aftermath of this match, or just something that happened at around the same time, without being much related? Unfortunately FN2 of International Women's Cricket Council appears dead, but I suspect it's not very much related. --Stfg (talk) 18:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Nah, its not closely related. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 09:47, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Probably best left out then, because of GA criterion 3b ("stays focused on the topic"). Cheers, --Stfg (talk) 10:03, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

kashmir
In response to your last comment I googled United nations Kashmir and this U.N. came on top which says Jammu and Kashmir. Thanks-- D<font color="#DA500B">Big X<font color="#10AD00">ray  21:22, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that is very helpful. Using the search box on the UN site, it appears that they are comfortable using both expressions. Jammu and Kashmir seems to occur about 3 times as often as Indian-administered Kashmir, but both are used too often to be accidental. My conclusion is that both terms are valid. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 21:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * And then there's the one without the hyphen, to make it more complicated. Hey ho! But I think the conclusion is the same: either is OK. --Stfg (talk) 23:06, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

lola kenya screen issues
The issues with Lola Kenya Screen were addressed in 2011 yet that has not been reflected on its page that still shows the article has multiple issues. Could you look at it and remove the caution that vitiates the quality of the article? Lolana — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolana (talk • contribs) 07:30, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I've been able to remove some of the tags, and I think the article can now be copy edited. The article still needs wikifying, those capital letter need dealing with, there are two unreferenced sections, and several primary sources, so I could not remove all the tags. It still needs a lot more work. --Stfg (talk) 08:34, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

WP:GOCE
Hi, Stfg. Some time back (end of May maybe), I requested a copyedit for Grey's Anatomy. Several editors have agreed that the copyedit was unsatisfactory, and I was recommended to place the article back in the queue. Since the article had been in the queue since late May/early June, is there any way the request can be unarchived and placed back in the queue, under the date it was originally requested? Hope to hear back from you, <font color="blue" size="3px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">TRLIJC19  (<font color="green" size="2px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">talk  ) 21:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Why was the response deleted? <font color="blue" size="3px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">TRLIJC19  (<font color="green" size="2px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">talk  ) 17:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Because I wanted to reconsider in the light of the history. I'm sorry about that. My new reply is below (I don't understand why the software didn't flag an edit conflict, but it didn't) --Stfg (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi TRLIJC19. I'm sorry, but no. You may remember the discussion at User talk:Rumiton. Since that discussion, I see no evidence that you've returned to Rumiton's talk page to discuss any issues with his copy edit, and in fact there have been around 360 edits to the article since he completed his work, the vast majority of which were made by you. I've had a look at the article and it's clear that there would be substantial work to do, so it would be not just a corrective pass-through, but a brand new copy edit. You are welcome to have another, but I'm afraid it must take its place in the queue. What I would strongly recommend you to do is to complete all the editing you want first, and then request a new copy edit, since there's no point adjusting how something is said until we know what is to be said. Sorry I couldn't be more help. --Stfg (talk) 17:28, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for responding. <font color="blue" size="3px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">TRLIJC19  (<font color="green" size="2px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">talk  ) 19:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Copy edit.
Hi, Need your help at Hyderabad, India for copy editing. Hope you may spare some time as early as possible, As we are awaiting only c/e requirement to resubmit it for FAC. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 23:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Omer123hussain. I'm sorry, I don't accept direct copy edit requests. Please add a request at the end of the GOCE Requests page. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for your kind advice, actually a British English copy editor was required for this article, thats why I contacted you, any way I will post the c/e requeted on the advice location. Regards and thanks once again. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 20:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries. It's fine to mention the need for British English in the request. Some non-British editors know how to do it too. --Stfg (talk) 21:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

lola kenya screen (2)
I just added the requested references on the Objectives and Awards sections. However, I do not know how to add things like Memos and Articles of Association, blue prints, brochures, tool kits. I am also working on the capitals in line with your advice. Please have a look and advise on the way forward. §  Lolana Lolana (talk) 19:42, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

I have added the references requested for the Objectives and Awards sections, removed the all capital letters from film titles besides editing the introduction of the article. Please have a look and advise on the way forward. §  Lolana Lolana (talk) 20:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, I saw you had done some good work today, and you probably noticed I removed a couple of "unreferenced" tags. I don't think there's anything more you need to do at the moment. I'm out tomorrow but will take a look some time soon and we can sort out how to do the Memos and Articles of Association. Best, --Stfg (talk) 21:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. Editing Wikipedia isn't easy. How and where do I add pictures/photos to the article? What else needs to be added for the article to be complete? §  lolana Lolana (talk) 21:25, 21 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, Wikipedia is tough at first. Actually though, images are easy. Take a look at Help:Contents/Images and media to get the ...ahem.... picture. To upload pictures, use the Upload Wizard that's linked from there.


 * If you're going to do much on Wikipedia, you may want to look at Help: Wikipedia: The Missing Manual. That's how I eventually got going. But there's a lot there. I'll be happy to help you with the article once the GOCE drive is finished (i.e. a little less than 2 weeks from now). Then I will copy edit the article and I can help with other aspects if you want. I hope that's all right. --Stfg (talk) 08:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Sure, it'd be great if you assisted with the copy-editing and cleaning up of the article to enhance its usefulness. §  Lolana Lolana (talk) 18:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thank you very much, Torchiest. That certainly helps to allay discouragement :) --Stfg (talk) 12:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Philip Smith
Hi, I just wanted to say thanks for your help with the article. Great to see it promoted to GA. Cheers Paul MacDermott (talk) 14:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It was a pleasure working with you. Congratulations on getting it to GA. Best wishes, --Stfg (talk) 14:48, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Jean Joseph Chappuis
I still think that the article is at a point where it can stand as it is, without the translation template being needed. The part you picked seems like a machine translation anyway, and I'll have a look if it really has to be included in the article. And, the good thing about wikipedia, you can restore the request yourself (be bold), although it is kind of you to ask for my permission. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 13:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

GOCE business
Hi again, Stfg. First of all, I wanted to volunteer as a Guild mentor, so I wanted to clear that with you as per the instructions. I may not have been affiliated with the Guild for very long, but I hope you'll agree my copyediting skills are solid, and I'd definitely like to help out editors interested in joining up with us or just learning the trade. I also thought I'd check about the barnstars from the July drive. No rush, of course, but I wanted to volunteer to help with that, if applicable. I believe I saw that a bot handles them, but if there's any manual work involved, I'd be happy to help. Best, BDD (talk) 20:52, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, please do list yourself as a mentor; you'd be ideal. Thanks very much for offering. I'm going to start on the barnstars in a minute. Not sure how to divvy it up yet -- it may be quickest just to do it, but thanks for the offer, which is greatly appreciated. Best, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 06:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Barnstars
Hi, Stfg. I was wondering how soon the barnstars for the July copy edit drive will be sent out? If you need me to help in any way, please let me know. Thanks. -- Dianna (talk) 05:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks Dianna. I was waiting for the program, but I'll do it today. Simon --Stfg (talk) 06:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

GOCE drive awards
I see the natives are getting restless about getting their shinies. I thought we were waiting for the script to do all the work for us, but I guess that's running behind schedule? Let me know if you need any help doing the calculations and/or handing out the goodies. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 15:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm creating the barnstars file manually now. It's not a job that can be split, but please keep watch here, as I'll ask you to share issueing the barnstars. --Stfg (talk) 15:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Need a Flunkie to Help? :-)
Hey:

Let me know if you need some grunge work done :-) I've got plenty of time today.

Your fan: Cliff (a/k/a &#34;Uploadvirus&#34;) (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks Cliff. That's very much appreciated and actually extremely timely. I've just finished creating the barnstars page, and as it's error-prone, if you'd be able to do some checks on it, that would be brilliant. I don't think it's necessary to check people's individual word counts, because I did this in a spreadsheet and triple-checked all cases where that result differed from the editor's own sum. Likewise, the leaderboard there was constructed from scratch and the only discrepancies with the drive page have been explained. But where I might have slipped up is in assigning the correct barnstars and rollover counts. The mapping from word counts to barnstar types is at the bottom of the main drive page. Everything else comes from the leaderboard.


 * Thanks a million for this. Simon. --Stfg (talk) 18:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I have to go to the bank and the market now, and will check back here when I return to get the latest update on what you need me to do. -- Dianna (talk) 18:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Great, thanks. Let's wait until Cliff has checked the page, and then could you, Torchiest and I issue to 12 people each? I suggest Torchiest takes the fist 12 (A--D), I'll do the next lot, and could you, Dianna, do from S to the end? --Stfg (talk) 19:34, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Works for me. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 19:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, I will do S to the end, as soon as the final details on the math are completed. -- Dianna (talk) 21:47, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * OK, gotcha - starting the checks now. Will let you know the results ASAP.
 * Regards: Cliff (a/k/a &#34;Uploadvirus&#34;) (talk) 20:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Go Team! --Greenmaven (talk) 21:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * LOL @ Jack!
 * Simon, I did notice some inconsistencies. Here's what I came up with in total words and articles using your numbers as the final arbiter (below). The various Barnstars (for words and the new rollover words were checked using your "total-words" figures, and they were all correct. For the record, however, when I punched in Lfstevens numbers, my calculator immediately exploded and I lost the distal phalanges on my "hunt-and-peck" fingers :-O


 * LEADERBOARD AWARDS FOR TOTAL WORDS (per your "total-words" figures):
 * 1st place Lfstevens (317,028)
 * 2nd place Queenmomcat (134,501)
 * 3rd place Uploadvirus (96,448)
 * 4th place Aichikawa (94,345)
 * 5th place Miniapolis (92,687)
 * 6th place Dementia13 (56,493)


 * LEADERBOARD AWARDS FOR TOTAL ARTICLES (per your "total-articles" figures):
 * 1st place Lfstevens (411)
 * 2nd place Aichikawa (51)
 * 3rd place Queenmomcat (48)
 * 4th place Uploadvirus (44)
 * 5th place Tdslk (40)
 * 6th place Miniapolis (31)
 * I didnt check anything else. Did you need me to? Let me know.
 * Regards:
 * Cliff (a/k/a &#34;Uploadvirus&#34;) (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh, ouch!, it's a real toughie doing this stuff without distal phalanges! Seriously, Cliff, thanks very much for doing that. I don't think any other checks are needed. Total words on the leaderboard is just the number of words edited, whereas the numbers in the individual totals add the 50% bonus for requests (*R) and oldest articles (*O), hence that discrepancy. I'm not clear what you spotted about the leaderboard awards for total articles. Those numbers are what's there, aren't they?

Dianna, Torchiest, unless there's something still to correct on the last point, we can go ahead and issue the barnstars now. (I'll do mine in the morning -- I'm currently on UTC+1).

@Jack,. (Nice edit summary, too.) --Stfg (talk) 21:56, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah Jeez, my wife could have told you not to let me get involved. I think Dianaa changed the leaderboard based on my numbers, though - might want to double-check with her while I go hide in the closet. Cliff (a/k/a &#34;Uploadvirus&#34;) (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I hereby nominated myself for the "Hall of Shame" - second? Jack, you there?
 * Cliff (a/k/a &#34;Uploadvirus&#34;) (talk) 22:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * (ec x 2) I am so confused. I can flip these edits back if they're wrong. But Cliff's article counts don't all match either!! What is up? -- Dianna (talk) 22:14, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * @ Stfg - thanks for comments. @ Cliff - not going to second anything related to shame. @ all - my power is going down (scheduled) in ten minutes. Not back for a few hours. Switching off now. Best wishes --Greenmaven (talk) 22:22, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * OK, guys, I just again rechecked the number of total articles by looking at the Drive Page where everyone posted their articles they did. The totals match the numbers I posted above. Cliff (a/k/a &#34;Uploadvirus&#34;) (talk) 23:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Dianaa, does it makes the most sense for you to revert the "Total Words" back to where Simon had it, or do you just want to wait for Simon to check his spreadsheet again? Sorry about all this, mea culpa :-(
 * Cliff (a/k/a &#34;Uploadvirus&#34;) (talk) 23:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I am going to do a partial revert and put the word counts back where they were. But Lfstevens still doesn't look right, as down below he shows a word count of 300,954 and in the leaderboard he shows 257,590. -- Dianna (talk) 00:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The version of the leaderboard attached to the barnstars document was slightly different than the one attached to the July page. The one on the Barnstars page was correct. I am pretty sure everything is copacetic now, and will be issuing my group of barnstars in a bit here, after dinner. -- Dianna (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks everyone. Cliff, no place in the hall of shame for you! This stuff is mind-numbing, isn't it?, which is why I asked you to do this. Huge thanks! And to you Dianna, for your checks, for updating the drive page, and for teaching me a new word. Barnstar time! --Stfg (talk) 08:10, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Missing My Baby
Hey there =) this article has gone through two copy-edits from GOCE but at its state it's been opposed by two users because of prose. It is a very short article and I was wondering if you wouldn't mind to brighten the prose? I asked the original copy-editor and he accepted me to come here and ask you. Best, Jona  talk to me  00:27, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Jona. Yes, that's fine. I may find time during the weekend, but I have to go and win some Olympic medals first, so don't worry too much. I'll start on Monday if not before. Best, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 08:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and no worries I can wait =) I will leave a note on the nomination page. Best, Jona  talk to me  11:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)