User talk:Thejoebloggsblog

Welcome!

 * }

Proposed deletion of Pagani Huayra


The article Pagani Huayra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
 * WP:Crystal: no definite details available, car isn't produced at this time.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jarkeld (talk) 12:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Pagani Huayra for deletion
The article Pagani Huayra is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pagani Huayra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jarkeld (talk) 12:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Help with SANFL seasons

 * To do the WAFL results for each season, I took the following steps:
 * 1) Place all the results in a plain text TextEdit file
 * 2) Use the standard AFLGame format for each game
 * 3) Carefully replace, one-by-one, all the elements with their proper Wikipedia formatting
 * 4) Take care to make sure that they will be replaced in the correct order, which I do not recall but will come with practice
 * 5) Ultimately I am aiming to provide details which are much tougher to get than for the VFL in as consistent a format as possible (this is why I have not been doing new WANFL seasons of late)

With the SANFL, results would have to be obtained for another site (unlike the WAFL) and might require work on a Microsoft Word file so only the final scores are kept unless you want to put all results into a detail match format which is tougher.

I hope this helps! (luokehao) 23:25, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Adelaide sister city relations
Hi Thejoebloggsblog, sister city relations are made by local government - i.e. the ones you have listed are made by the Corporation of the City of Adelaide, and are shown on the appropriate page, that is, City of Adelaide. The page to which you have added this section is for "Greater Adelaide" which contains 18 different local government areas, each of which have their own, differing, sister city relations. This has been pointed out on the article's Talk page, as others have made this error before you. Bahudhara (talk) 12:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to Adelaide Wikipedia Users Group meetings
Hi, in case you're not already aware of it, a group of Adelaide Wikipedians has been meeting on a monthly basis since April, with the aim of improving the scope and quality of articles on South Australian topics. We usually meet at UniSA's City West campus, and our 19 November meeting will have as guest speaker the president of the History Council of SA. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 23:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

SANFL Pages
I'm hoping you're planning to actually fill all these pages in, I really don't want to go round and delete them all as empty pages but I will if you don't create them properly-- Jac 16888 Talk 17:07, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (List of SANFL minor premiers) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of SANFL minor premiers, Thejoebloggsblog!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I added new page to the article in hopes you'll eventually add categories, de-orphan the article, etc."

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of List of SANFL wooden spoons


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of SANFL wooden spoons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tchaliburton (talk) 03:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

St. Kilda Football Club icon
Hello, thank you for creating new icons for the AFL teams; however, St. Kilda's colours are wrong. The stripes go Red, White, Black not Black, White, Red. Would you be able to fix that? Thank you. 120.144.193.107 (talk) 12:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Invitation


Hello, Thejoebloggsblog,

The Editing team is asking very experienced editors like you for your help with VisualEditor. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and fix these small things, too.

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Unsubscribe from this list •  Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletter  •   Translate the user guide

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Port Adelaide Football Club
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Port Adelaide Football Club you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 15:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harold Oliver (Australian footballer)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harold Oliver (Australian footballer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 04:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harold Oliver (Australian footballer)
The article Harold Oliver (Australian footballer) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Harold Oliver (Australian footballer) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 21:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harold Oliver (Australian footballer)
The article Harold Oliver (Australian footballer) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Harold Oliver (Australian footballer) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 20:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

VFL is not separate to AFL
Please stop separating the VFL flags from the AFL flags. There is no reliable reference that does that. There is no difference between Hawthorn's 1989 flag and Collingwood's 1990 flag. I appreciate all the other work you put into the articles, but this just has to stop. Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 13:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Port Adelaide players
I fully understand that the 1996 SANFL and 1997 AFL Port Adelaide club is the same club, but you can't merge the players category, as it is a subcat of Category:VFL/AFL players. The old system of Category:Port Adelaide Football Club players for only AFL players, and the Category:Port Adelaide Football Club (SANFL) players and Category:Port Adelaide Magpies players cats for SANFL players worked perfectly in terms of subcategorisation. And it's in alignment with how we deal with Richmond/Footscray VFA players. The cat system isn't perfect - ie all of the South Melbourne players are in the Sydney Swans cat, but you need to consider the bigger picture, and not just redefine things without any consultation or discussion. Regards The-Pope (talk) 02:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
Shearonink (talk) 04:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
Shearonink (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Just a few things and then...
Some of the Harold Oliver (Australian footballer) references need to be adjusted/fixed/corrected. Please look at: #6, #8, #11 - they are all user-edited sources and aren't considered reliable for Wikipedia's purposes. As soon as these are taken care of I can finish up the Review. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 01:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Port Adelaide Football Club. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.I have opened up a discussion on the talk page, please discuss there rather than reverting. Flickerd (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Edit war at Port Adelaide Football Club
Your recent editing history at Port Adelaide Football Club shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. You have also previously been reminded about assuming good faith and this edit summary is not appropriate, if you continue down this path, you may be reported to WP:ANI. Flickerd (talk) 08:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Flickerd (talk) 12:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey
Beginning on November 28, 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) will be conducting a survey to en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:


 * https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.


 * Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adelaide Oval, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Schultz ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Adelaide_Oval check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Adelaide_Oval?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adelaide Oval, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HMS ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Adelaide_Oval check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Adelaide_Oval?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * 1973 SANFL Grand Final ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/1973_SANFL_Grand_Final check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/1973_SANFL_Grand_Final?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Greg Bennett, Peter Carey, Peter Anderson and John MacFarlane

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Russell Ebert Magarey Medals, State Library of South Australia, July 2017.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Russell Ebert Magarey Medals, State Library of South Australia, July 2017.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Flickerd (talk) 12:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Betty Wilson Adelaide Oval 1949.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Betty Wilson Adelaide Oval 1949.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Flickerd (talk) 13:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Dispute resolution for Talk:2018 AFL season
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Flickerd (talk) 04:44, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

ANI - WP:CANVASSING
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Aspirex (talk) 08:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bob Quinn (Australian footballer)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bob Quinn (Australian footballer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bob Quinn (Australian footballer)
The article Bob Quinn (Australian footballer) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bob Quinn (Australian footballer) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Australian rules history
Hi. Per the Bold, revert, discuss cycle, I'm interested in discussing the changes you'd like to make to the Australian rules history section. There's always room for improvement and different perspectives, but right now I find many of your edits to be problematic. Thanks. - HappyWaldo (talk) 07:48, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You seem to miss the point of the "people's game" reference. The sport may not have been referred to by that nickname constantly in the press, but it certainly had the reputation for being "the people's game", or alternatively, "the game of the people", "game of the masses" etc etc. - HappyWaldo (talk) 06:27, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Port Adelaide v South Australia (1914), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Observer ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Port_Adelaide_v_South_Australia_%281914%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Port_Adelaide_v_South_Australia_%281914%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Port Adelaide Football Club records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Port Adelaide Football Club records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Port Adelaide Football Club records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flickerd (talk) 09:31, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Port Adelaide and Norwood, Football Times, 1985, page 12.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Showdown (AFL), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Matt Crouch and Bryce Gibbs ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Showdown_%28AFL%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Showdown_%28AFL%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

File:1994 SANFL Grand Final banner, Port for AFL 1996.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Richard Russell 1951.png
Thanks for uploading File:Richard Russell 1951.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Port Adelaide Football Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lindsay Thomas ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Port_Adelaide_Football_Club check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Port_Adelaide_Football_Club?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Merv Shaw


The article Merv Shaw has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. El principita (talk) 12:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tasmania Devils, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Launceston ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tasmania_Devils check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tasmania_Devils?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1884 Port Adelaide premiership players
Template:1884 Port Adelaide premiership players has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Tasmania Devils AFL team logo, 2018.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Darryl Borlase, SANFL Grand Final, ABC (public broadcaster), screenshot, 1996.png
Thanks for uploading File:Darryl Borlase, SANFL Grand Final, ABC (public broadcaster), screenshot, 1996.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Malcolm Cooper (footballer)


The article Malcolm Cooper (footballer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability, no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Not even close to meeting WP:NAFL"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darryl Wakelin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFL ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Darryl_Wakelin check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Darryl_Wakelin?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Port Adelaide Football Club Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Port Adelaide Football Club Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Egg throwing incident, 2019.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Egg throwing incident, 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Denver Bulldogs FC logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Denver Bulldogs FC logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Smith (Australian footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Observer ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Thomas_Smith_%28Australian_footballer%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Thomas_Smith_%28Australian_footballer%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2018 in Australian rules football


Hello, Thejoebloggsblog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2018 in Australian rules football".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 09:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi
Hello. Help copy edit for article. Thanks you. Cheung2 (talk) 07:47, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:1994 SANFL Grand Final banner, Port for AFL 1996.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:1994 SANFL Grand Final banner, Port for AFL 1996.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:The Advertiser (Adelaide), Front Page, 14 December 1994.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

GAN for Adelaide Oval
Hey Thejobloggsblog, I was going to take the above GAN, but upon reading the article I would have to quick-fail it. Far too much of it is unreferenced. I would suggest you withdraw the GAN and work on ensure everything is suitably referenced before renominating. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 11:10, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adelaide Oval
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Adelaide Oval you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 09:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adelaide Oval
The article Adelaide Oval you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Adelaide Oval for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Football kit
Hi, there is a request, the kit of Hyderabad FC has unique pattern, here you can see. Can you please create the pattern for the article. I am also requesting some other editors who are active at Template:Football kit/pattern list in case you are busy. Thank you and please let me know. Dey subrata (talk) 01:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1992 SANFL Grand Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 9 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/1992_SANFL_Grand_Final check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/1992_SANFL_Grand_Final?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Australian Football Hall of Fame logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Australian Football Hall of Fame logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Port Adelaide Football Club logo 2020.png
Thanks for uploading File:Port Adelaide Football Club logo 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Good compromise reached on Adelaide's montage
It is good to see a compromise has been reached on Adelaide's montage after lots of edit warring. The best photos have been retained (Torrens rotunda, School of Mines on North Tce, and of course the pano of Vic Sq)...I was a fan of the Glenelg shot with the dramatic sky and rocks because I think it epitomises that area quite well, but the replacement is just as good. All in all, a good result and a good montage to replace the previous long standing one. Well done. Ashton 29 (talk) 11:58, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:McLaren Wharf, Port Adelaide, 1870.jpg


The file File:McLaren Wharf, Port Adelaide, 1870.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Sammy Lunn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sammy Lunn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sammy Lunn& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2014AFLICLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:2014AFLICLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Fos Williams Inagural SANFL West End Brewery Painting, 4 Oct 1954.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fos Williams Inagural SANFL West End Brewery Painting, 4 Oct 1954.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 02:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Showdown (AFL), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rashid Khan ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Showdown_%28AFL%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Showdown_%28AFL%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Showdown (AFL), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Matt Crouch, Charlie Dixon and Jake Kelly ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Showdown_%28AFL%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Showdown_%28AFL%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

AHPVSS maps
Would you by any chance have a map of the Busselton circuit? I've noticed that it's the only race that doesn't have a map drawn up, and since you drew the rest I thought you'd be the best person to ask. 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 12:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander McKenzie (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Journal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spectacular mark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Coleman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australian rules football card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Todd.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Port Adelaide Football Club - Lead
Hi ,

Since you've made an attempt to remove the detail in the lead of the article a couple of time, I thought I'd come to your talkpage to discuss why it's formatted and covers what it does.

In accordance with MOS:INTRO, the lead aims to summarise the the most important parts of the article, so it can stand as a concise version of said article. Port Adelaide is notable for being one of Australia's oldest clubs and its successes in the SANFL. As such, both of these are covered. However, the identity of the club is also equally as important as the success it has achieved - it is an integral part of the club. Hence, it also acknowledges items such as the rivalries the club has, colours it wear and the nicknames it uses.

Furthermore, in accordance with MOS:LEADLENGTH - a single lead paragraph is not enough for an article the size of Port Adelaide's. The Article easily breaks 30K characters - it should aim for at least 3-4 lead paragraphs, of which it currently possesses.

If you have any other issues, please don't hesitate to reply and ping me.

Thanks, Empoleonmaster23 (talk) 07:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Please refer here and provide me with a response before any further action to the page. Empoleonmaster23 (talk) 02:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Golden Gate AFL.png
Thanks for uploading File:Golden Gate AFL.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adelaide Oval, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Taylor Walker and Charlie Dixon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Sporting Life Magazine Teams
Hi !

As in my edit summary, I've come over here so we can figure out some sort of compromise in regards to this issue. I've reverted the page to the state before the dispute, and would appreciate if you could refrain from further reverts in regards to this until we discuss the issue. My position is as follows:
 * The name was actually listed incorrectly - I was misled into beliving the teams were called the "Team of the Year". However, as the references use the latter title they must be titled appropriately. Text within the wiki should be changed however, to reflect the correct title.
 * The Modern All Australian side and the Sporting Life teams should be listed seperately as, despite being the same concept, they are recognised independently from one another - hence why the Carnivals and Modern AFL teams are recognised by the AFL, whilst the Sporting life teams are not. The Team selection undeniably happened, hence why it's listed in the first place, but they're seperate honours and should be represented as such.
 * Additionally, the Carnivals and Sporting Life teams overlap in years due to their nature as seperate entities.

'''Thus, I propose the following: During in-text mentions of the team we change the text to accurately reflect the actual title of selected team by Sporting Life. We leave the section seperate under the Individual Honours section. We make the addition of that photo you added to this section for much-needed media coverage in the latter part of the article.'''

'''If you have any disagreements, please feel free to counter-propose. I'm all ears if that's the case.'''


 * A lesser side point to end off - the nicknames listed were actually sourced in the main body of the article, so I've re-added them to the infobox. They're recognised by the club on its own website.

Looking forward to your response, and thanks! Empoleonmaster23 (talk) 08:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I'd appreciate if you could actually partake in discussion over this, rather than removing the content. I reverted the page to the state before the dispute - hence my request to not perform edits on the related sections until we come to a resolution. Empoleonmaster23 (talk) 10:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Adding prose does not necessarily make you correct. The difference between the Sporting Life and official All Australian team is their association with the Governing Australian Football body. Sporting Life has no affilition with the body - simply providing their own 'experts' to come with their best of team. The Carnivals, and later, the AFL's all Australian teams have direct connection to the governing bodies of the organisations - the Carnival Team being selected by the State Body representatives, and the AFL being the governing body of the sport in the modern era. That's where this distinction between the two lies, and why representing them together is incorrect - they are not considered the same entity, hence why one is unofficial and the other is official.


 * I once again request you leave the page alone while we come to a compromise. The following is proposed display, with references removed to prevent clutter on your talk page. My proposed references would be the already pre-listed ones for the listed All Australian members, Sporting Life information supported by researh performed by Peter Argent, and then your linked AFL references for additional clarity.

Sporting Life's All Australian
Sporting Life Magazine first pioneered the concept of a 'team of the year' in 1947, and would run each year until 1955. The AFL does not recognise the teams selected by Sporting Life.
 * Bob Quinn – 1947 (captain)
 * Dick Russell – 1950
 * Fos Williams – 1950, 1951
 * Harold McDonald – 1951, 1955

All-Australian
The All-Australian team is considered a 'best-of' selection of players for each calender year, with each player represented in their team position. The team is selected by a panel of experts.

Interstate carnivals
 * John Abley – 1956, 1958, 1961
 * John Cahill – 1969
 * Greg Phillips – 1980
 * Mark Williams – 1980
 * Craig Bradley – 1983, 1985
 * Tony Giles – 1983
 * Stephen Curtis – 1983
 * Greg Anderson – 1987
 * Martin Leslie – 1988

Australian Football League
 * Adam Heuskes – 1997
 * Gavin Wanganeen – 2001, 2003
 * Matthew Primus – 2001, 2002
 * Warren Tredrea – 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004
 * Brett Montgomery – 2002
 * Josh Francou – 2002
 * Chad Cornes – 2004, 2007
 * Mark Williams – 2004 (coach)
 * Kane Cornes – 2005, 2007
 * Brendon Lade – 2006, 2007
 * Shaun Burgoyne – 2006
 * Chad Wingard – 2013, 2015
 * Travis Boak – 2013, 2014, 2020 (VC)
 * Robbie Gray – 2014, 2015, 2017, 2018
 * Paddy Ryder – 2017
 * Darcy Byrne-Jones – 2020
 * Charlie Dixon – 2020


 * I'm only reverting the page to its prior state until we come to a consensus on display. Please continue this conversation here, Joe, this is my fourth attempt at contact.


 * Addressing what your edit summary said, yes, I have read those sources. I've even suggested their use above. However, Primary sources are no more important than Secondary - both have their advantages and weaknesses. Primary =/= good/bad, Secondary =/= good/bad. Empoleonmaster23 (talk) 12:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Your recent editing history at Port Adelaide Football Club shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Empoleonmaster23 (talk) 13:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Empoleonmaster23 (talk) 14:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Travis Boak. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne  (talk  •  contribs)  13:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary that did not appear to be appropriate, civil or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doggo375 (talk) 23:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sampson Hosking, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Observer and Gadfly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Grand Final photos
Great that you have taken photos of the grand final. It is very hard to get properly licensed photos for events like this after they occur. Steelkamp (talk) 07:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Templates For Discussion - AFL Player Significant Statistics Templates
A new discussion has begun regarding the AFL Player Significant Statistics Templates. Please add your thoughts there. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 00:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Boston Demons logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Boston Demons logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Houston Lonestars logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Houston Lonestars logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

GAN for Sampson Hosking
Your Good Article Nomination for the article Sampson Hosking is over three months old, but I would like to review it (part of the GAN Backlog Drive). Would you be around to respond to my feedback and suggestions? It looks as though you are not currently vary active. :-( &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 00:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I am still here @JohnFromPinckney. Thejoebloggsblog (talk) 01:57, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sampson Hosking
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sampson Hosking you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnFromPinckney -- JohnFromPinckney (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sampson Hosking
The article Sampson Hosking you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sampson Hosking for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnFromPinckney -- JohnFromPinckney (talk) 11:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, its been a pleasure working on this article with you. Thejoebloggsblog (talk) 01:55, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, to you, too. I hope we can work together again some time (ideally when I have more time to spend; I was away too much this past month). I hope your DYK nomination gets accepted. Best regards,&mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 11:45, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jimmy Broadbent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commentator.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Sampson Hosking
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:San Diego Lions FC logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:San Diego Lions FC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Showdown (AFL), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Hudson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Football Plus, Magazine cover, Vol 3, No 9, April 16, 1997.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Football Plus, Magazine cover, Vol 3, No 9, April 16, 1997.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Port Adelaide and Norwood, Football Times, 1985, page 12.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Port Adelaide and Norwood, Football Times, 1985, page 12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 16:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harry Hewitt
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harry Hewitt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 20:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harry Hewitt
The article Harry Hewitt you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Harry Hewitt for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 21:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Russell Ebert
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Russell Ebert you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:01, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Russell Ebert
The article Russell Ebert you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Russell Ebert for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Showdown (AFL), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Clarke.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kicks after the siren in Australian rules football, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Observer and The Advertiser.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adelaide Oval, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brodie Smith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Showdown (AFL), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlie Dixon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

File:1889 Port Adelaide Football Club membership.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1889 Port Adelaide Football Club membership.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука13 12:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)