User talk:ThinkBlue/Archive 14

New section

 * When are you free to do the ECW list, because I have time. Since I just expanded the WCW Hall of Fame (how does it look?) and I plan on doing the NWA Hall of Fame.-- Tru co  23:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks. If you can, convert the List of ECW Tag Team Champions list like the WCW World Tag Team one, don't worry, this one is shorter. -- Tru co  21:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, oh you see it weird because a "days held" column added. Just ignore that, it was also added to the List of WCW World Tag Team Champions list, so you can use that as your template.-- Tru co  23:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Just notify me when you're done so I can review it and fix up the lead.-- Tru co  01:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Kirsten Dunst FAC?
I've not had a chance to look at the article recently, but if you adopted the good suggestions made at PR, and are happy with it, why not take it to FAC? You know what makes a featured article, so use your judgement. As a precaution, read through the FA criteria again to be certain the article complies. I'll try and catch up with it at FAC. Brianboulton (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey
Nice to see you've got Vengeance at GAN. Good thing I'm not against you in the cup. So, how you coming on Kirsten Dunst? You going to take it to FAC?-- Will C  16:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, people ignore me all the time, it is in their nature. It doesn't seem that long to me. I'll leave some comments for you when you do. Yeah, hopefully Sacrifice will be my second FA. I just started working on it a few days ago to take it for the fifth points it will bring in the cup. I'm hoping by the end of the day I have two articles on GAN.-- Will C  17:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I know, I was kidding. If you did ignore me I wouldn't be talking to you know. I was truthful. It isn't extremely well written. It isn't that important, but is any article taken to FAC really that important. The only notable events in TNA have been the big three and Victory Road 04. Though the return of Sting at FR 06 was important. Slammiversary 08 is important with the death after the event.-- Will C  17:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Quit saying sorry. No reason to be sorry. It wasn't like I was sitting here just waiting for you to reply. To me the event event had to mean something in history. TNA Unbreakable went down in history because it got TNA its first five star match. Big returns or some amazing debuts. Stuff along those lines.-- Will C  17:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Really I'm trying to make a new excuse. That nothing really important here happened but I feel all articles should be of a Good or Featured stature. Then I'm not taking it to FA for no reason.-- Will C  20:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for helping to fix the tables up, but I'm gonna have to "hi-jack" your sandbox for awhile because I have to do major fixes to them, its not your fault, but there are a couple issues, as seen in this revision, so I'm going to have to fix that up.-- Tru co  22:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I finished, how does it look now?. Plus..its up at FLC.-- Tru co  00:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah I know >=/. (We were at a disadvantage though). But yeah, thanks for the compliments. :) 14:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC
 * ...and it was a pleasure to work on that list with you.-- TRU    CO   23:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Too much flattering :)-- TRU    CO   23:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh, I forgot your favorite team, but at least we made it further than them :P TRU    CO   00:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

"Yellow" for FAC
So, how do we start? --Efe (talk) 05:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Blue, its now on PR: Peer review/Yellow (song)/archive1. --Efe (talk) 10:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * OK. --Efe (talk) 04:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, I think. Two FAC? --Efe (talk) 00:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, Blue. I see no probs. --Efe (talk) 00:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Majority of Coldplay articles are FA potentials. hehe. Have you any plans of bringing the mother article to FAC room? I mean Coldplay. However, it's one of Gary's babies. --Efe (talk) 00:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Good idea. I know Gary will like it. But, not now, IMO. For now, our target is "Yellow". --Efe (talk) 01:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

It seems good. I suggest, though, to put the "listy" song version after the section music video or merge it with tracklisting. Its fine. I've been also busy with other stuffs so I kinda set our plans aside. --Efe (talk) 03:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps after I've done my real life responsibilities we could push through the plan. --Efe (talk) 07:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Then that's settled. Just tell me when you're ready so that I can hasten up finishing my stuffs here. --Efe (talk) 05:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh my. I forgot its final examination season. In the Philippines, we culminate every school year in March. I am not really sure if I'll have extra time but I can still pitch in, although not fully. --Efe (talk) 04:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

No Mercy (2004) GAN review On Hold
This message is to inform you that the article you nominated as a Good Article, No Mercy (2004), is now on hold and awaiting changes. Cheers, Monowi (talk) 08:55, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Still interested in an admin coach?
Hello, saw your name at WP:ADCO/RFC and was wondering whether you were still interested in an admin coach. I coached Gary King in the past (whom I believe you know) and well, you can see the rather incredible results ;-) However, given that he's been annoyingly stubborn to being nominated again (even when six people practically beg him to run), I have a slot open and I'm interested in coaching again (as there isn't really anything left to coach Gary on, as his eye-popping amount of content contributions testifies to). Anyhow, enough musing on my recaltricant coachee. Cheers, — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 10:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, sounds good. More or less, my coaching is mostly hands-off (I'm not going to constantly review your contributions, ask you trivia questions on what an admin is, and so on and such forth) and boils down to setting generalized guidelines on what you should be doing and what direction you should be going in, as well as serving as a person you can go for on questions and advice on well, just about anything wiki-related. It's late and I'm sleepy, but I'll leave a couple notes here before I log off. Three general areas that you should keep in mind that people look at during an RfA are as follows:
 * Civility – it's cliche, but it's true. Above everything else, if you're polite, then you're fine. It's possible to be politely angry at someone, so there's no need for this ever to be a problem. That said, from a review of your contributions, this isn't a problem at all, so no worries.
 * Article contributions – well, this is a done deal, as you have a plethora of solid content contributions (solid work on Maggie Gyllenhaal too). My area of focus is featured lists (hence why Gary went in that direction), so feel free to contact me if you ever decide to bring a list up to par. You're a pretty prolific WP:GAN reviewer also, so that only helps. Only thing I can really say is to keep it up.
 * Administrator areas – the meat and bones of being an administrator. You can get away with limited content contributions in some cases, but getting away with a lack of experience in administrator areas is rare (usually restricted to incredibly civil individuals, longtime content contributors, or similar). As far as I can see, you focused on CSD a bit in the past, and a bit of vandalism reverting that's really the limit of the admin-related activities you've gone into. My advice is to simply pick the areas you want to work in as an administrator (as really, you're seeking the tools to use them, no?) and focus on them. I'm not going to force you to involve yourself in areas you're unfamiliar with or unwilling to contribute to, as that's simply unproductive and if you do so and pass your RfA, it's likely you're simply drop those activities. For the purposes of CSDs and vandalism patrol, Newpage patrol and Huggling are fine as far as both are concerned. For vandalism, you can go a bit farther by clerking a bit at WP:AIV by placing AIV templates under reported users (for instance, if they haven't received their final warning, haven't been active, and so on and such forth). Really, it's up to you. I have pretty good experience in most admin-related areas, so where you go is fine by me. Do note that you should be careful in CSD if you decide to do Newpage patrol. It's better to play it safe if you think something doesn't exactly meet the criteria (say a borderline A7 for instance) and instead leave a prod or simply let it go. People are remarkably thorough at RfAs and it pays not to have skeletons in the closet.
 * In any case, I'm exhausted, and have to wake up tomorrow to watch some guy's inaguration, so 'night. — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 13:02, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

New MG image
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I found a new image of Maggie Gyllenhaal from Flickr and was able to get permission from the author to use the image on Wikipedia. I have added it to the infobox, so please take a look and determine if you want to keep it there. The image was taken in 2004, so although its a few years old, she's actually looking into the camera which I think makes for a better infobox image. Anyway, let me know what you think. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 10:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No worries, it's better to have a more up-to-date image of the actress. Looking at Liv Tyler's image, it definitely could be better. After sorting through almost a thousand images of her (I really wish people would only upload images that they've taken on Flickr, not ones they found on other websites), I found a few possible images. Potential images include 2003, 2006, 2007, 2008, or 2008. Would any of these work (after some of them have been cropped of course)? --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Just rank them and I'll go in that order. I'm most curious about which of the two 2008 images you'd like. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, I sent out a request for the first 2008 image, and if I don't get a reply, we'll go from there. If I get permission, I'll let you know when I upload it. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No response for 2008, went on to 2003. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 10:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I received permission for this one and uploaded it in the infobox, tinker with it as you like. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

The author of the first image has got back to me giving me permission for their image. I uploaded the image and put it in the middle of the article, feel free to move it to where you wish. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 06:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It may not be the best image, but we already have permission for this one if you want me to upload it. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

:P
I stole your nav bar. Mwahahaha. Ravens lost. :(  Simon  \\  KSK  Yes we can! 23:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * So you were rooting for the Ravens :P-- TRU    CO   22:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh, thats why they got owned by Arizona. :)-- TRU    CO   23:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Absolutely. It was like in my backyard haha. Stupid Chief Justice messed up the oath. Did you see Bush get booed? Hysterical.-- TRU    CO   23:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * From my house to where the U.S. capitol building is located, its around a 10-15 minute drive (depending on traffic), so MD to DC is not that far. Yeah, they did it out of respect because that was after he got booed. Yeah, that was funny as hell. Replay :D.-- TRU    CO   23:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope, why?-- TRU    CO   23:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Passing through... (cont.)
Heya, thought I'd start the subject again seeing as you have a massive talk page haha. I would really like to work with you on a person's article to gain experience, and would really love if you helped me with Toy Story 2 - one of my top 3 fav animated films. It's in a rubbish state right now so I think we'll have more fun getting our hands dirty as we kinda do it from scratch, and we'll find it way more satisfying =) I will be around a lot more now as I finished my final exam yesterday (yay!) and I look forward to working and flirtin' with ya ;) How does this proposal sound? -- Harish (Talk) - 23:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Ooo I love the first one but the article is in better shape. Maybe we should do both? It's inevitable they'll make a Toy Story (film series) one day with Toy Story 3 coming soon, so we could effectively get a good topic going. Hmmm if there's was one person I'd like to work on it's you ;) but if you mean articles that's quite broad. I think it'll be cool if we work on artist, as I feel your talents are too good to be left in wrestling and actors. I thought about you the other day and assumed you'd probably be happy doing Chris Martin's article? Only if you're interested =) -- Harish (Talk) - 00:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC) P.S. Thank you for the exam confidence boost! How did your finals go? =)

Oh my God, I feel bad - I just (Hit BLUE) !!! So yeah, that'd be a sweet achievement to share with a sweet lady, Good Topic here we come! It's gonna be quite an effort to get done, as we are starting from scratch. Do you own any of the DVDs/BDs? I'll be honest with the Chris Martin article, I'm gonna follow your lead. That is to say I'm relying on your previous experience with biographies as I'm not that sure where's best to research for suitable sources - I'll hope to learn a fair amount from you :) I'll def be willing to put effort in though! Ooo so I'm dealing with an intellectual femme fatale eh? So how does someone as suave as you end up being a wiki-addict? =) -- Harish (Talk) - 20:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Brad Pitt Oscar noms
Why do you keep reverting how many nominations Pitt has had? He was nominated for Twelve Monkeys, and he's nominated now. That's two. I don't know why you've put it back to one at least three times today, but please stop. -- Mike (Kicking222) 00:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That's true, but that doesn't mean the statement isn't factual. He's still been nominated twice; whether one of those noms has been decided or not is irrelevant. Anyway, thanks for not reverting it again, and I hope my rephrasing helped. -- Mike (Kicking222) 01:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No apology needed. You're quite the valued contributor, and nobody's perfect- I sure as hell ain't. (For example, I just used "ain't".) -- Mike (Kicking222) 16:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Wanna Good Topic?
Paul London and Brian Kendrick are already GA's, and Paul London and Brian Kendrick just needs a bit of work to nominate it for GA, and then we can get a good topic, what do you say?-- TRU    CO   01:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Another GA review
Can you review 1997 Qayen earthquake? Thanks, Ceran →// forge 18:29, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

The Last Castle needs your review
I have posted The Last Castle movie up for review. It's a great movie starring Robert Redford and James Gandolfini about prisoners retaliating against their disrespectful warden. If u have some time I would be really grateful if u review it. The review is listed on Peer review/The Last Castle/archive1.

Thanks a lot--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 17:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, I'm back, would you be able to sign into Yahoo. Thanks.  Save   Us.  Y2J  10:21, January 27 2009 (UTC)
 * Cough, yeah. Just check out my warnings on my talk page about "uncivility". Its okay, I think I'll give up on that too. You got a reply elsewhere as well.-- TRU    CO   00:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, just maybe after this bug goes away :)-- TRU    CO   21:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * So you ever think about FLC reviews?-- TRU    CO   22:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * So..that happens to me as well now, even though I'm considered a good reviewer. You'll gain from experience, just look at me now :D-- TRU    CO   22:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hope to see that day soon :)-- TRU    CO   22:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I thought that would be me, but ok. Haha.-- TRU    CO   22:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * True true :)-- TRU    CO   22:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Discussion at WikiProject Record Charts
Please see this discussion and provide your opinion on proposed page moves. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Backlash (2006)
As one of the major contributors to this article, I thought I would let you know that is nominated for FA status.  TJ   Spyke   01:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Kirsten Dunst
The FAC is in danger of atrophying - nothing happening. Have you contacted the opposers recently? You might ask them to review their opposes in the light of the changes made to the article, or at least to state clearly the outstanding grounds for opposition. It may be that you need to take an initiative here, to keep the FAC alive. All the best, Brianboulton (talk) 23:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of ECW Tag Team Champions
I could have really used your help here =P-- TRU CO   503  20:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No help? Well, it passed anyway. Congrats!-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 22:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I guess.-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 22:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not mad, you made the table, I just fixed it, so you contributed to it. Plus I co-nomed it with you.-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 22:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Making the table is the hardest part, the prose is easiest to do. So you take credit for it, or I'll throw a balloon at you =P-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 22:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, especially if its ice cold water. Then I think you will "Think Blue" =P lol-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 22:59, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oooo. Too bad that's not how you pronounce it.-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 23:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh. At least it got you to give yourself credit =P-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 23:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ya.-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 23:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nothing really. You?-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 23:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah me too. Over the Edge (1999) just wiped me out. I see maybe one by the end of the year for me. But I like to mostly work on lists and reverting vandalism and reviewing FLC's. -- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 00:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking of doing maybe One Night Stand (2005) as my last one for FA. Yeah, me and FL and you and GA. -- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 00:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Haha. Don't worry, you can help. But I will do that like in June or if possible during my Spring Break in April.-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 00:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Doubt it. I don't have time to commit myself to any major expansion right now.-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 01:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't want to get caught up in it because I can't commit myself to it and I was really getting competitive and I didn't want that, in addition to the fact that I knew I was going to lose.-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 01:24, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No insult taken =)-- < TRU CO  >  5 0 3 01:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you still being coached for RfA?-- TRU  CO   15:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh. Yeah, he isn't that active anymore. Email sent.-- TRU  CO   15:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Checking his contributions, he does like the max of 10 edits a day, or even less. Like today, he did one edit. So if I were you, I would send him a message to see what's up with his coaching.-- TRU  CO   16:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You know since you're the main contributor to the Shawn Michaels article and are more aware of its formatting, how about summarizing the feud of himself and JBL? Its a bit notable IMO.-- TRU  CO   20:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 20:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

JD 2005
What about just moving the image to the left side of the page? I don't care a lot either way, but it seems like it would be better to use a pic of JBL from 2004/2005 since it's about a 2005 PPV.  TJ   Spyke   00:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Jeff
Hell yeah, that'd be ok! That's an awesome shot! Though I did notice the copyright tag on it, how are you going to get it? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 06:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, The Orton and HBK ones are awesome shots! That's a very nice deal! :P ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 08:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * :) If I ask you to see if you can get this one and this one too, will you hate me? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:07, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Brialliant. I just figured it might entail a lot of extra work for you, that's all. That guy is an awesome photographer! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thats awfully nice of you. I don't mind if you add it to the article you know, you're the one who persuaded the guy to let you have it. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

<--Well, if you're sure... let me know when you upload it! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Fanstastic! Thank you! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Fantastic, I'll add it to the article now. 2) brilliant, 'bout time both of those articles got a good main image. 3) I dunno, it's an awesome shot of 'Taker, but the one thats currently in the infobox has a slightly better view of his face, so I'm unsure. 4) Aw, man! That photo would have been awesome! Plus we need one of Jeff as WWE Champion. It's very depressing to not have one... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh that HHH one is great. I'd kill for that guy's photography skills... Fingers crossed for Jeff! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea the Jeff one's great. Check it out, I added it. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Actaully, I already loved you forever! Now, I really love you forever!! YAY! This Funaki one is good, Layla needs a better shot (check out the one currently in her article) and Tazz] currently has no image in his article. Now I feel really bad about the amount of work you're going through... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 22:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

<-- Fantastic! See here I couldn't see anywhere better to put it, so... Feel free to move it or whatever. Got ya this too...
 * You're totally welcome! You earned it putting up with my requests! By the way, I know it's a little late but congrats on Taboo Tuesday passing GA! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 22:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't blame you. I expanded a few last summer, and realised very quickly that a) I wasn't much good at it, and b) I really hated it, so I stopped very quickly. :P I stick to bios nowadays, I think most of them are in worse condition than the ppvs, and I enjoy it a hell of a lot more. :) I notice you've exapnded out into actor bios, though (congrats on the Maggie Gyllenhaal FA btw) - it's a real loss to WP:PW. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 22:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the compliment and you're welcome! Yea, lets get to work on MVP (tomorrow, I'm logging off soon!) if you're still up for it. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 23:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 'Night. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 23:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't mind, I'm not fussy. I did some work earlier replacing some of the Online World of Wrestling refs, but there's loads of them, so we'll have to replce them. One thing we do need is a better lead. Since you wrote Mike Mizanin's (which is awesome!) I was wondering if you could do that. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

<--You're welcome! :P And fantastic! That Shane one looks amazing! I don't think we're going to have to do too much work on MVP, it seems to be in fairly good shape, which is always a good thing! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That bastard is the most entertaining thing in WWE right now! :) Alrighty, hit me up, when you're done! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * *Shrugs* what can I say? I'm sadistic! :P I meant the storyline overall!! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, HBK's always entertaining, but I think Randy was better. I'm really loving him at the moment. I gues I just like bad or evil boys! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, Jeff's a bit of a bad boy himself Wellness policy violation wasn' for steroids according to the rumours I'd use "Burke" until you get into talking about SD when he was MVP. So it'd be "Burke has wrestled for numerous promotions", but "MVP is the longest reigning US Champ in WWE history" or whatever. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, just because you like cleancut guys like Cena! Boo! I can't help it if I like the bad boys! or men... Cool. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

<--The Brian Kendrick is good, I'll grant you that. Terrible sense of style though... Anyway, sorry for the late reply (dinner with my boyfriend!) and about the lead, just a few little things. :) "wrestled for numerous independent circuits" - there's more than one indy circuit? And is there any chance of a date for being in DSW? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 09:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No, what I meant was you say "wrestled for numerous independent circuits" - should it not be independent promotions? Although you could probably add that he made appearances for TNA too. For a date in DSW, say "assigned to WWE's developmental territory Deep South Wrestling (DSW) in McDonough, Georgia in 2005." or something along those lines. I finished replacing the refs and I added some more info as well, so I think we're probably done after that! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL, I know. I can barely remember when we decided to work on his article! Had to be ages ago... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, I dunno. How 'bout Mr. Kennedy? Kennedy... sorry, couldn't resist! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, and then you can nominate Kennedy! once we're done with it, obviously ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I made one tiny grammar fix, but apart from that it's great so add away! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

<--Nominated Now we just have to wait 2 months for it to get reviewed and no, of course not. Go for it! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I have literally two minutes before I log off for a few hours, so I'll get stuck in later! Bye! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 23:32, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

hey
How are you? What have you been working on lately?-- Will C  04:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm alright. Why are you retiring from the PPV events? Nothing at moment. Too busy in real-life.-- Will C  23:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Well good luck with your future endeavours.-- Will C  23:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I wasn't sure what else to say.-- Will C  23:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I understand, I was just trying to do a bad joke. The whole future thing. Which bio are you working on at the moment? I guess this means you aren't going to take JD 08 to FA?-- Will C  01:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, good luck with those articles. Maybe one day you and me ca work on something together. I believe me a Nici have one to do in the future.-- Will C  03:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Climate of Tampa Bay
I provided a secondary review of the article and cleaned up a bit of the reference issue, and some of the punctuation issue, as an act of good will. I found issues with the use of reference 7 (a blog), and reference 12 doesn't say anything, although I bet the source they used is somewhere on that website. Just a head's up. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I like the way this GA is progressing. The main editor is now editing the article using some suggestions I've given him based on experiences I had with the Climate of Florida article GA process.  Let me know if you review another article in the meteorology project that I haven't submitted...this idea of two people reviewing it seems quite balanced.  Thegreatdr (talk) 00:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Let us know if the article has now been improved enough for GA. Most, if not all, of your suggestions have now been satisfied.  Thegreatdr (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Userbox for GA reviews
The userbox User Good Articles reviewed has been updated so that it can now link to a page in your user subspace where you keep track of all your GA reviews, if you have such a page. This can be done by adding a | and then the name of your user subpage (or subsection of your regular user page) wherever you have the template called. For example, on my user page I am using ""which displays as There is more information on how to do this at Template:User Good Articles reviewed.

Note: If you are not interested in doing this, you don't have to do anything; the template will still work for you exactly as it does now.

Best, r ʨ ana ɢ  talk/contribs 17:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Lovers in Japan
Hey ThinkBlue, i just saw your version of the song in your sand box and it looks good. I just rearranged the sections like WP:SINGLE. I think you can replace this version in the actual song page. Just one thing, the music video section needs to be enhanced a little along with the chart performance section. Regards --Legolas!!  ( talk to me ) 04:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: GT
Oh god. I'd totally forgotten our plans for that! *guilty face* I don't mind really. I've no problems with doing it, and no problems with not doing it. Up to you! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, good! That IP was a pain in the *ahem*. Sure thing. That's what I do! :P ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, sorry! We just had a bloody power cut! I'll get stuck in now. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That's quite impressive! Ok, thoughts. 1) first paragraph - 'He also appears on the Raw and SmackDown brands as well' - the "also" and the "as well" are redundant. Only one of them is needed. 2) Second paragraph - 'a televised competition that would award the winner a WWE contract. He was one of the winners in the competition and was awarded a WWE developmental contract' - seems redundant as well. Perhaps remove "and was awarded a WWE developmental contract". 3) second paragraph - 'Tag Team Championship in one occasion' - typo - should be 'Tag Team Championship on one occasion'. 4) third paragraph - 'in their debut' - on their debut sounds better imo. Perhpas say what year the debut was also. 5) third paragraph - 'During his with brand' - did you forget a few words here? 6) third paragraph - 'marking it his first top title' - should it not be "making" it his first top title? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I think you were concentrating more on your schoolwork! :P Regarding the marking/making, I think it would be either "making it his first top title" or "marking his first top title". ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, cool. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

<--Looks great! Nice job! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. Go ahead! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:57, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Really? Can't say I'd noticed. I'll get on after finishing with Miz. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:13, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, I just got done with Miz. Can you do a read through/copyedit please? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm about to log off for the night, but I'll do it first thing in the morning. Promise. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

<--Sorry, for the delay! Ok, lead first. 1) Paragraph 2 - 'Anderson has wrestled for numerous promotions in his career' should be 'Anderson wrestled for numerous promotions in his career' for grammar purposes. 2) Paragraph 3 - again with the "marking it his first title with the company" - either should be 'marking his first title with the company' or 'making it his first title with the company'. That's it. I'm off to copyedit Kennedy now (little later than I promised I know). ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Copyedit ✅. Hey, so is The Miz ready to be nominated? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! :) Oh and thanks for the copyedit on Miz! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 23:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No you didn't. :) We make a damn good team y'know! Gotta be honest, I didn't log in yesterday either... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 23:11, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I felt the same way about the copyedit on Kennedy's article. LOL. Yep, the article's in great condition and ready to go! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 23:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. We're getting there. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 23:23, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

<--Gotta tell ya, reading through Slam! archives looking for specific matches is tedious. :P Right, thoughts, 1) "They first began teaming together in 2007 as a team" - spot the redundancy! 2) Perhaps wikilink "dropped". 3) "won the World Tag Team Championship, in the process." - I think the "in the process" is unnecessary, but that's just personal preference. Other than that it looks good! As does the article; I was slightly worried about the length of it, but it looks good! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I have, but I've just getting to grips with Slam. I'd go crazy if I tried a different site... Sure, as long as you check John Hennigan once I finish. :) Quid pro quo is that spelt right? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Great! Will do, let me know when you want me to go through the team article. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm going to get dinner now, but I'll be back online in a few hours. I'll do the tag article then, and then finish off Hennigan and get you to check it. I'll let ya know when I'm done! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:27, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have a quick note, however. I think in the 'Formation and WWE Tag Team Champions' section, you should probably explain why they were rivals. Put in a sentence or two about how they were competing against each other for the number one contendership to the ECW Championship. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 22:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Think the feud started around October 2007 if that helps. Will do. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 22:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

<--Yea, that sounds good. Maybe remove the "once" though, it makes it sound like they were opponents a few years ago, instead of about a month before winning the tag team championship. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 23:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks good! Congrats on Vengeance by the way :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. It's ready. Nominate away! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I dunno. I've been looking over it the past few days, and it looks good. I'd say it'd pass GA, but something about it is bugging me, but I don't know what. Strange huh? Yea, any help would be appreciated! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ Alright, I'm off to nominate it now! Thanks for the fixes earlier by the way! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

<--Yep. We did good! Yea, getting work done and studying were mine. Glad I'm doing one of the two! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL. Yea. Oh, fantastic! I'm glad someone other than me and Nikki are doing something about the cleanup listing... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 07:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, it's much appreciated! Oh, no, really? Man that sucks. Stupid WWE. I'll bet there'll be a load of dead refs from that. Great. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 06:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, thank you! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 08:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 21:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC) The  Helpful  Bot  21:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Irony
Heh, just mere days since Mount Redoubt (Alaska) was promoted, it becomes active. Pretty ironic.  Ceran  thor 21:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Re:Heath
Sure. First of all, how eager do you want to complete it? [as in are you in a rush]?-- TRU  CO   23:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Can you hold off until tomorrow? In addition, you want to split the work?-- TRU  CO   23:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok. So how do you want to split it?-- TRU  CO   23:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll try to do his awards and you can do the lead.-- TRU  CO   23:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The sourcing of his awards?-- TRU  CO   00:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Ethan Hawke
--Hunter Kahn (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Nevado del Ruiz FAC
Since you conducted the GA review, wanna comment? Please? ;)  Ceran  thor 16:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

WWE RAW & Sorry again : (
Hello, ThinkBlue

First of all i wanted to say sorry about what i wrote sometimes i get angry and Shawn is my favorite superstar in RAW so Sorry. About RAW, Shawn Michaels beat JBL this Monday and Vladimir Koslov attacked as he said on Smackdown so he will be facing Vladimir next week on RAW. Now this should be edited and unless you forgot this will not highlight his career but if he does go to WrestleMania 25 to face The Undertaker someone will have to put his match with JBL and Vladimir in his article so be sure to edit his page.

PS: I edited my message in Talk:Shawn Michaels. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fhassan (talk • contribs) 12:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

WP:ADCO/RFC
Hi there, ThinkBlue! I am planning to archive the entries over two quarters old like yours. Please respond in a week if this bothers you. By the way, I am also a six-month-plus coaching hopeful who has not been contacted. :)--Thecurran (talk) 04:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Coldplay help
The NME site has several song reviews up, so make sure you use them all. I saw that some song articles used them, but some don't. Rely on this as yoru primarily form of critical reception. With these reviews, you should be able to get some of your articles up to FA quality. WesleyDodds (talk) 03:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I will be stress free by early April. May is fine for the nom. I can see what I can do. --Efe (talk) 05:17, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, I need help. Do you have a photo for "Lost!"? I checked flickr. There are lots, very nice, but I don't know which one. Thanks. --Efe (talk) 08:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking for those images. Not encyclopedic for the Lost! picture. Too far and unidentifiable. But if there's no other photos out there, I think its passable. The Viva is real nice. I saw their concert in Japan via MTV. The Yellow images are nice too. Got nice lights. Are the authors of those images going to permit us? --Efe (talk) 09:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll work on those stuffs later. --Efe (talk) 04:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:FLC
Oops. I totally forgot about the project we had. I've been so busy in real life that I haven't really done anything here on Wiki but review FA/L/TC's. Can we hold it off for awhile, till next wknd probably, or not?-- TRU  CO   18:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Kirsten Dunst
I notice that the "strong oppose" on FAC remains unanswered. If the point raised is incorrect it needs to be rebutted. If it is correct, the article should be amended to meet the criticism. The article is generally well-supported, and deservedly so; it would be a pity to see it fail by default. Brianboulton (talk) 19:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for February 2009
SoxBot II (talk) 03:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 18:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC) The  Helpful  Bot  18:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

"Lovers in Japan"
Hey there ThinkBlue, I've reviewed Lovers in Japan and have left some comments on the review page. Hope to see these improvements. Diverse Mentality  19:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Kirsten Dunst - FAC fixes still required
There are still fixes to be made on the Dunst FAC. Please look carefully at what the opposer is saying, and deal with all his points. I have done a bit, but you must do the rest. Brianboulton (talk) 17:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Reverts to edits on Coldplay songs
I would caution against naming section "Music and lyrics". Here it says, "Because the entire article is about the song, it is recommended that there be no section headers with titles such as "Song information" or "About the song"." Although you are not specifically using the word "song", I would say the spirit of this guideline cautions against naming a section about the song's composition with general music terms, like "song, music, or lyrics." "Composition" seems like a better general term to use, because it is not only more concise but also a better catch-all for descriptions of the song's key, chord changes, time signature, instruments used, lyrics, interpretatons, etc etc.

Furthermore, I think you may want to reconsider having the sample template in use of the body of the article. First off, it is needlessly bulky and can cause some clearing issues (as are possible with images or blockquotes). Additionally, from scanning through a lot of the song articles, it seems like the descriptions use a lot of NPOV terms that aren't sourced. In IE6, the text gets cut off, too. Rather than try and correct them all, it seems better to just use the smaller, more visually appealing audiosample template that is designed to stay in the infobox, without any clearing issues or any text clipping. It's been used by plenty of other song articles. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 21:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Record Charts
We have two unresolved threads. Please visit. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 04:36, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

"Light and Sounds" and Yellowcard
Hi. I see you've been working on the "Lights and Sounds" article. That is great, and you've done a great job. However, if you have the time, I encourage you to do the same for the Yellowcard article, as it needs a lot of sources for the information that's already there. Tim meh  !  23:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

This user is....
Might I ask how to create a "This user is A Christian" icon on your homepage? —Preceding unsigned comment added by The C of E (talk • contribs) 18:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Cheers mate! —Preceding unsigned comment added by The C of E (talk • contribs) 18:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Snuffy's Parents Get a Divorce
Just thought I'd let you know that I've come to lend a hand with your GA review. :) I will input my thoughts, and we can decide from there if it's GA quality. Have a nice day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 05:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, sounds like a plan. Should we notify the user that I have also added comments to the article? CarpetCrawler (talk) 02:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies for the slowness in response (I'm going through a random pointless bout of depression, I don't even know why I feel drepressed!) I shall drop the user a message on their talkpage. Do you want the seven days to begin now? I've seen situations where the user doesn't even know their article is on hold until they've gotten a message on their talkpage! Have a nice day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 22:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * What's annoying is that I don't even know why I feel depressed! I'm feeling a little more cheery now, since I'm working on the No Jacket Required article and such. I'll drop the user a note about the seven day wait. And yes, I agree that it's incredibly annoying. Back when I was originally on here, I once had a user who wrote a nice article, and I only had like two or three concerns... the user didn't even bother to fix them! It was like the user was nominating the article blindly and then left it alone. I don't know, I tend to think that when an article I nominated is put on hold, it would be my first Wiki-priority. But maybe that's just me. :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm feeling a bit better. I decided to have a jam session with my iPod. :) I don't know why they came, though, just for the past week and a half I've felt crummier than normal. But oh well, I'm getting better! I feel like I'm on a psychiatrist's couch right now, LOL! And yeah, I understand how annoying it is! It's like "Dude, come on, it's so close to passing!" and they just don't bother. It sucks, because there are people waiting for someone to review their article for like a month and a half, and are ready and willing to bend over backwards so that their article can pass (Myself included,) but get shafted. CarpetCrawler (talk) 00:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed, that's not something good to have in common. I also don't like when GA reviewers don't take note that the content of the article may not be well known enough to have enough references and sources. For example, if it's a song that wasn't released as a charting single, unless it's something like Free Bird, it's probably not going to have a ton or wealth of information. One of the article I nominated that a user reviewed didn't take this into account, and while some of their concerns were indeed very fair and correct things to be concerned about, they were nothing more than something that could be fixed in a day or two (For example, there were no reviews. It literally took me about ten minutes to find five reviews. If I spend more time I could find more,) The other things were stuff like "Oh, you could have extended this." "Could have?" Dude, if I "could have" extended it, I would have! It's a notable song that wasn't released as a single ("Captain Jack (song)") what else do you want? The sandwich he was eating?! But alas, I am rambling too much. Anyway, it seems that the user who nominated the Snuffy's Parents Get a Divorce article seems to have dissappeared for the last few days... I hope they see my concerns in time! Have a good day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 16:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's been seven days... what do you think we should do? CarpetCrawler (talk) 05:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I know. I just wanted to run it by with you first, since we've both reviewed the article. :) OK, so we'll have to fail it, which is too bad, it's a nice article! I hope all is well, by the way. :) I've been feeling better lately. It seems that I get into a better mood the more I do stuff on this Wiki! I guess that's the best cure. ;) Have a great day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 21:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL, look at the history, both wrestlinglover and I sent you a message at the exact same time! :D CarpetCrawler (talk) 21:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I'm not a cruel guy either, so I'll also allow the user to fix up the article. :) And LOL, see, I don't have that problem, since I don't often get messages on my talkpage. I tend to not stay in the forefront, and just stick to contributing to articles, making friends and having fun, which is something everyone seems to have forgotten when it comes to this project. If you're not having fun contributing, I say, why bother contribute at all? And that DEFINITELY sounds like a great idea! In fact, after I fix up No Jacket Required and send it to a FAR, and after I get it passed at some point, I'm going to collaborate with another user on another article, so it'll be fun to do two projects with two different people! :) What do you have in mind? Have a nice day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 23:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, one of the more fun things to do is the research! Nothing thrilled me more when it came to re-doing the NJR article than when I would search a newspaper archive, and I would find something VERY important to the article. Would make my day! :) As you can see, it doesn't take much to make my day, LOL. :P It doesn't matter much to me what you think would be good, but I had always said I wanted to get atleast ONE article related to Billy Joel, Elton John, or someone else really famous, to GA or FA status (Which I tried to do with "Captain Jack (song)" which I described to you before,) so I would love to work on an article related to one of those artists. However, would you happen to have any ideas? I'd surely do whatever you'd like. :) Just as long as we do it AFTER I get No Jacket Required to featured status, since I'd like to get that done before taking on any other big projects. ;) Have a nice day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 00:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hm? Not even Crocodile Rock? :P I'm into BOTH bands and artists, it's just that my tastes reflect my age! Some of my favorite bands are Genesis, R.E.M., Huey Lewis and the News, Depeche Mode, amongst others. And I would be willing to work on any article you choose, as well! Have a nice day. CarpetCrawler (talk) 00:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

(Good idea to do a line break!) I LOVE Pearl Jam! :) In fact, "Better Man" is one of my favorite songs. Want to work together on that when I finish up NJR? :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 00:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Take a look at your history again. I think Wrestlinglover and I are psychic... CarpetCrawler (talk) 00:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies for the delay in response (I LOVE March Madness!) but I just wanted to drop you a note saying that sounds good! And also, the user fixed what I had asked them to do in the Snuffy article. I think we should pass the article, but I thought I'd see what we both thought. Feel free to pass it if you feel it should be passed now. :) Have a nice day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 03:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The tournament's been stinky this year... although Western Kentucky surprised me with the upset, even if Illinois was coming back in the end! Other than that, nothing much, although Minnesota screwed up my bracket by losing last night (I had them in the Sweet Sixteen...) And make sure to notiify the user of your concern! And of course, have a good day! :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 16:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, coach Tubby Smith has turned those Gophers around. ;) Also, your Bruins had a close call last night! VCU came back at the end, but they held off to win! A lot of people were expecting VCU to snag the upset when the seeding was first announced. Good on you for sending the user a message on their talkpage, we'll see what happens from there! Oh, and Louisville will win it all. :P CarpetCrawler (talk) 17:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello there! Long time no chat? :) Just dropping you a note that it seems the seven day period has passed once again, and your concern hasn't been met (The user hasn't even been online in like eight days.) Do you suppose we fail the article, or give the user the benefit of the doubt, because being gone for that long obviously means something beyond the user's control is keeping them from logging in to Wiki. Have a great day! :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 05:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry about being a bother again, but what should we do about the Snuffy article? The user hasn't touched it since you told them of your concerns, and they haven't logged in in over a week... CarpetCrawler (talk) 20:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Dang, that stinks. Oh well, next time the user nominates it, it will probably pass. So how have things been with you? :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know, it kinda stinks. The article will definitely pass the next time the user nominates it, at least. :) And yeah, it does stink, I know how you feel, since Syracuse got... kinda stomped and all... but hey, Duke lost! DUKE LOST!!! I was jumping through hoops when that happened. :D My bracket is totally busted up, since Louisville lost and all. :( Argh I was doing SO good at first, and now my whole bracket has gone to the sh*tter! I mean, I expected UConn to be the one to fall out of all of the number one seeds, and look what happened... :-/. In Wikinews, I've been working on random stuff pretty much. I've created articles, got my first ever DYK nominee, and another one that is HOPEFULLY going to also make the DYK list, and I've been doing work on NJR. After that thing goes through a FAR, I am SO taking a wikibreak for like a week. Man, I haven't even gotten to the review and I already can't believe the incredible amount of work it takes! CarpetCrawler (talk) 20:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Methinks I need to start a new message, this Snuffy one is getting GIGANTIC! :P And "our" brackets, pish posh! :P Actually, in all seriousness, I fill one out for fun every year. I know people that bet and stuff, and to me that's a great way to lose money, and nothing else! I just do it for fun, I like to see how good I do! And LOL, I did the same with my NJR PR. I waited like a week, because some things that were pointed out were so menial that they were painfully tedious, and boring stuff. I had to grin and bear it though, I wanted to see what I needed to take it to FAR! And if you need assistance with Mr. Pitt's article, drop me a message and I'll see what I can do! And, I know, it IS tiring... and I haven't even started it! A good friend of mine, Realist2, is helping me out with copyediting, pointing out errors, and such, so that the FAR will be as smooth as possible! So of course, I stink at doing articles, so there's a lot of work to be done! :-/. Good luck! And my spring break isn't until the 4th, so I'm waiting VERY patiently for it to come! CarpetCrawler (talk) 21:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Brad Pitt
I think that article is long enough now to warrant a split of the filmography section. Bradley0110 (talk) 22:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Word-wise, they're both about the same length. The Heath article seems to be burdened by all of those cite templates though. Oh, well, it's just food for thought for you. Bradley0110 (talk) 22:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Old Friend
Hey Blue, remember me? How's been stuff in life and WikiPedia?  R k O r  T o  N  03:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

One down...
... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 10:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Nah, it's no problem. It was pretty easy to fix up. :) Here's hoping for Kennedy. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 10:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's fine, I'm not the most prompt of people. Don't be silly, of course you should get some of the credit for MVP! You mightn't have helped out with the review, but you helped to get it up to the standard where it all it took to pass was a few wording fixes! Yea, I git a little bored yesterday... Still, I left you the more difficult of the comments in Kennedy's GA review to deal with! :P I took the really easy wording fixes! Thanks for the congrats! I was very pleased. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 11:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, exams. Bummer! No wonder you've been busy! :P Well, I'm glad you appreciate it! I got too lazy to finish off the review for Kennedy, and then that comment at the top about citing that Kennedy was an arrogant heel, or something, seemed like too much work to go hunting though sources for, so I thought I'd let you handle it! Lazy of me, I know, but since you appreciate it, it's all good! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, trust me, I have a lot of lazy days! Nah, stop worrying over MVP! I wish all my GA reviews were that easy! Well, I didn't wish Bob Holly was easier, but that's because it was on hold for like 10 minutes! 'Sides, wikipedia is part of my downtime! Some easy vandalism reversion that requires no brain cells and makes me feel superior to the idiots who go "X sucks" or whatever, really brightens up my day. And, my god, is that sad! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:25, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

<--Yes, it made sense! To me, at least! Well, that's kind of you to say! I know, I don't understand the attraction in vandalising wikipedia. Plus, it's so much easier to revert than vandalise - one click and the vandalism is rolled back! It's mad... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I know it's brilliant! Vandals are mental imho. Some of the stuff is pretty mean too! If I had an article here, I'd probably cry at some of the stuff that was written! It's just random kids insulting people they've never met, and you just know that if they ever did meet them, they'd probably ask for an autograph! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Hypocrites, but what can we do except keep reverting and getting them blocked? :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 10:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. It's a never ending cycle of fun, huh? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, Paul London and Brian Kendrick are already GAs, so that would leave Paul London and Brian Kendrick and Ashley Massaro to do. Sure, I can help out! But not from March 23 to April 3 - I'll still be online, but I have oral exams in Gaeilge and French to do over those 2 weeks, and I don't know the exact dates yet, so... Hmm, d'you think we should talk to Nikki 'bout this? She's the main contributor on the Ashley Massaro page, maybe she'll want to help out and lessen our workload!. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure! We'll get started tomorrow! I'll leave Nikki the message now. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

<--Brilliant! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 22:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You too! :) Hey, Nikki finished and nominated Ashley Massaro at GAN. We'd better get a move on on Brian Kendrick and Paul London! Go n'éirigh an bóthar leat - ♥ Nici ♥ 12:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. Ok, the lead:
 * "They first began teaming together in 2003 with WWE, though Kendrick left the company, but returned in mid-2005. They reunited as tag team once again." change it to "They first began teaming together in 2003 with WWE, but Kendrick left the company. He returned in mid-2005 and they reunited as tag team once again." or something similar - have the two sentences around the same length - it'll flow better.
 * Perhaps say who they dropped the titles to.
 * "the 2008 Supplemental draft, that" should be "the 2008 Supplemental draft, which"
 * That's it. I cant' really think of anything else that might be mentioned, perhaps their World Tag Team Championship (WWE) reign, like say "In the same year, they were drafted from SmackDown to the Raw brand, where they won the World Tag Team Championship" or soething. Looks good! Go n'éirigh an bóthar leat - ♥ Nici ♥ 17:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Just one thing - "In the same year, they were drafted from SmackDown to the Raw brand. In the same year, they were drafted from SmackDown to the Raw brand, where they won the World Tag Team Championship." - think you forgot to remove a line! Yes, thanks! It's my Patrick's Day sig (yes, I know it's early) Go n'éirigh an bóthar leat - ♥ Nici ♥ 18:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep - looks good! :) Sure thing - we'll tag team the tag team article. sorry, sorry! Couldn't resist Go n'éirigh an bóthar leat - ♥ Nici ♥ 18:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, you would have - if you were being sarcastic, lets just move right along... I don't mind really, whatever you find easier works for me. Go n'éirigh an bóthar leat - ♥ Nici ♥ 18:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sound good to me. :) Go n'éirigh an bóthar leat - ♥ Nici ♥ 18:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

<--Hmmm, I think it's quite notable, but you could probably leave it out if you can't find a source and just say once they lost the titles they were the longest reigning champions and leave it at that. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 12:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok. Yep, a lot of celebrating! All gets a little hazy around 9pm though... Ah weel, I'm Irish, what d'you expect? By the way, I am so sorry about Paul London and Brian Kendrick, I've nothing on it, while you've done loads. I feel really bad... :( I'll get stuck in today, I promise. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure. I'll do it now. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. :) Just seeing "Paul London was subsequently released in November" or whatever it was really annoyed me, because it gave no context, so I decided to add some. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ Go ahead and nominate it! :) And yes it made sense! I think it could, I mean I don't see why it wouldn't be allowed. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm the main contributor to Adam Birch, but not the MNM article. It would make a good project indeed. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

<--Of course its cool! :) Oh, wow, I didn't now I was the second on Morrison - I never bothered to check! :) It'll have to be a few weeks into the future if thats ok, my oral exams are kind of demanding attention for the next fortnight or so, and then I'm on Easter holidays, so I can work on them then. Maybe some of the others will be reviewed by then as well... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 23:49, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay! I didn't notice you'd responded to me! :( Yes, absolutely in the future. I'll let you know when my exams finish and we can get started! Providing of course you aren't too busy! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 03:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Good! :) I'll talk to you later then! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:40, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

re: John Cena filmography
Hi. My opinion on this is that the two film appearances would be much better served by a brief discussion of the roles and perhaps what led up to it. It's a waste of time and space to table two films. Hope that helps. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Jon Hamm revert
Hi ThinkBlue - wondering why you reverted my edit on Jon Hamm's online videos? Why would they be considered not significant? The Lex Luthor video is one a the most viral video online right now and it was on E! last night. He obviously is committed to doing these type of video b/c he has done 2 in last last 3 months.

Thank you,

Dwell88

Mr. Kennedy GAN items
There are still 3 items that need to be addressed for Mr. Kennedy, which I bolded on the talk page.  Royal broil  01:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I am satisfied that that the article meets the GA standards, so I have passed it. Congratulations! I have added review comments on the GA review page if you want to improve the article more.  Royal broil  04:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Shawn Michaels reverts
If you think I have put in too much detail, by all means edit it to reduce the detail. However, I'd really be interested to see how you think a World Championship ladder match isn't noteable? Or the last match of the feud that provided the transition for his feud from Jericho to JBL? As it currently reads, his feud with Jericho never ended and while it is arguable, I think it's important to note that prior to Michaels being JBL's employee, they were feuding.

Also, Michaels refers to himself as WWE Champion because he is obliged to by law. We are not. If his Championships & Accomplishments section bill him as winning the WWF Championship (3 times), why would his intro not follow suit? Tony2Times (talk) 19:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * How is an extra sentence explaining that Jericho was a replacement for Punk too much detail? I know it's Michaels' page and not Jericho's but the way it's written at the minute makes it seem as if Jericho was originally billed to do double duty. Also what is your problem with Jericho and Michaels' final match. It was the end to their feud and it kick started another one. It currently reads as if things finished at the ladder match and then arbitrarily another storyline was picked up at the end of December when in fact it had started in early November, not to mention their Survivor Series match. Tony2Times (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd have been calmer if you'd have just edited it in the first place rather than delete it so I had to do it again before the ladder match was even deemed notable. I admit that the Cyber Sunday stuff is too detailed but it's not POV to think that just because a match didn't happen at a PPV, it doesn't warrant mentioning. It was the final time the two faced each other during that feud, it ended one feud and begun another when JBL interfered. The ending of one six month feud, the beginning of another four month feud, all in one match. Not notable? I may have gone overboard with detail, though I don't think its POV that they each had a hand on the strap maybe POV over whether that's notable or not, my reasoning was that it was a rare (or unique as far as I can remember) way of ending that matchtype and that it played on elements of his previous eye injury making it seem more like a narrative. Tony2Times (talk) 19:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lights and Sounds (song)
The article Lights and Sounds (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lights and Sounds (song) for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Admiral Norton (talk) 23:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 17:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC) The  Helpful  Bot  17:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Heathlist
DAMMIT! I forgot all about it, why didn't you hit me up? Sure I'll review.--Best,  ₮ RU  C Ө   02:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I mean you did all the work now, all I can do now is review it for quality. Yeah, I've been a bit busy with ER, FLC and FAC.--Best,  ₮ RU  C Ө   02:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, and you did a great job, just a few issues I pointed out a the PR ;) Thanks, I wanted to get more exposure around WP, and why not with FAC and ER.--Best,  ₮ RU  C Ө   02:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Come on now don't think of me as a high regard, I'm still the ol' Truco. OMG! Congrats! I would have known if you kept in touch :P--Best,  ₮ RU  C Ө   03:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Haha. Grown up? Nah. Smarter and Wiser? Yeah. =D I readdressed your PR comments.--Best,  ₮ RU  C Ө   02:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

long time no type
How have you been.? It has been a while.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 15:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Good to hear, good luck on Nici and you doing a Good Topic for The Miz and Morrison, also one for London, Kendrick, and Ashley with Nikki. Right now, I just made an agreement with Nici to get a certain amount of articles done by September which I'm looking forward to failing. But what I'm working on is Turning Point (2004), Final Resolution (2005), and Against All Odds (2005) (which I have a DYK submitted on) all at GAN. Also I have List of TNA X Division Champions at FLC. So, that is mainly it. Trying to leave wiki, but I keep failing. Too addictive.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 18:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I got a few more to go as well. Mainly I've been wanting to take List of X champions to FL since forever, but I finally decided to. Plus I need the points for the Wikicup. It seems you are killing me in the thing. I'll have around 100 points by the end of day, with 125 points on content that is waiting to be passed, and under two weeks to do that. I believe I need to have at least 160 points at the moment to advance in the wildcard. Good luck on Ledger's stuff. I need to retire so I can focus more on school, but I keep changing my priorities when I shouldn't.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 18:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Probably, that is if I get into the Wildcard. Hopefully, Turning Point will get a review soon. I plan to work on Sacrifice 08 today and renominate it at FAC. Then I'll have three at GAN, one at FLC, and one at FAC. Yeah, I agree. Hopefully I'll be gone by the end of today.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 18:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll probably do a good topic as well, though not now. I have a few in mind for the future. Yeah, well I could use some change right now.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 21:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I have a few bios and tag team articles I'll need help on in the future, if you are interested we could work on one of those I have listed.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 20:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Well you'll have to talk to Nici about that one. Considering we already chose to work on AJ together. I guess all three of us could work on it. Or maybe, just throwing this out there, you and me could work on Travis Tomko considering he has a WWE section you'll be more familar with. That or Christopher Daniels as a back up plan. Both have tagged with AJ and both have tag team articles. But that is your choice. I won't be able to work on any article long term until I get other stuff finished.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 21:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I'll talk to Nici about Styles when she gets back on. Meantime, if we work on Tomko, you handle the WWE stuff and I'll handle the TNA stuff to make it even. Then we'll work together on the rest, if Nici has no problem making it a three way on Styles then I guess we can move to that one, but that it your decision.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 21:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

No, not at the moment. I had it planned for the future. We can work on it, I'll take the TNA section and anything related to it. I don't really care what we work on, I have no problems. That is when I have time, right now just too busy but in the future I'm cool.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 21:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm cool with that, it is what I was going to do with Nici on AJ and future articles. AJ was the first one together to see if me and her could work well together. Then a Good Topic of The Brood was down the road. Your strong suit is WWE articles, mine is TNA. It is best to do Christian that way.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 22:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Alright, I'll get mine finished in about a few weeks. Before Lockdown (2009) probably at least.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 22:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Also for me.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 23:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, would be better than the one in there at the moment. Clearer than anyother image in the article. It is from September so it is recent. It would work just fine, and I'm sure a few more will come along after WrestleMania.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 23:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not that picky on stuff. As long as it passes all the Good Article crteria I'm fine with it. Cage deserves to have an article that is written well. It is just too bad Vince doesn't give a shit about him. If he had stayed in TNA, he would be a three world heavyweight champion now. Anyway, nice image, is there one of AJ on there anywhere that is good? Most of his images are either blury or old. He needs about two or three to liven it up somemore.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 00:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

When you get the Cage image uploaded, do you think you can get these as well:, , , , , , , , , , , , and one more of Cage ?-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 00:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, sorry I went looking for pics on there. Never went on there to look before. Always used what was on here. Most of those are of him doing his entrance (what I gave). They are still photos and could help for future PPvs since Styles has appeared on every TNA monthly PPV. I didn't know you replied till after I found all those and had them added. This image will help. For AJ's In Wrestling section. The way I heard it, Johnny Ace is stating Cage will not find success in WWE, that Vince cares more about his doormat. Plus Vince is quickly to change Cage's storylines. MVP is probably picked to win it or Benjamin. MVP wins the US title this Friday. Plus Cage got pinned last night and has yet to pin anyone other than Swagger once. He is stuck in mid-card again. I believe the only reason WWE got Cage back was for Edge and Christian and to make sure TNA lost another main eventer. The thing with Angle was, TNA got its first major still active main eventer from WWE. Angle still has alot left in him and was an amazing gain. TNA were smart to build entire company around him. As for WWE, they will probably soon have one world title, one world tag, one woman's, and maybe one middle title. Meaning titles will be rare. Cage will not be on top of WWE while Trips wants to be the man. I've lost hope for Cage. He should have been pushed hard from the start. I hope he becomes something in WWE and wins either one of the world titles, but if he is in the mid-card after the Draft, I see him being lost in the shuffle, and like D'Lo Brown, released.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 00:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Just wanted to stop and say you are doing a good job with Cage. I see you make a new edit every little bit when I decide to get on and check the articles I have up for review. Also I found this image of Cage:. It might help, IDK.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 23:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll respond here; Thanks, I appreciate the compliment. Like I said, I want to be serious and see Christian's article be GA. That image seems a bit suspicious, I'll keep looking for some more images of Christian and AJ. When you come back, I guarantee you that my half will be done and you can work on yours and we have ourselves our GA. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Great work!
I just wanted to drop you a note saying that you've done great work on the album article Lights and Sounds! :) Keep up the awesome work! CarpetCrawler (talk) 03:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ahh, now you know how I felt when I expanded the No Jacket Required article! It takes an incredible amount of work. Take a look at what the article looked like before I began work on it, it was a pain in the rear! here But after awhile, after you get the basics down, it actually begins to be really fun, and I never enjoyed doing anything on this Wiki as much as working on that album, later on! Have a good day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 03:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yup! I'm hoping Siena can sneak out of overtime with the win! Nine seconds to go... CarpetCrawler (talk) 04:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Done and done. ;) And LOL, yeah, that's true. :D I like a lot of teams, I just don't like when teams like Duke and UNC get far in the tournament. Such obnoxious fans! LOL, I rarely get the Super Bowl right. This year was a rarity, I got this year's correct. Yeah, I can't stand the minor criticism, sometimes I feel like going "WHO CARES?!" Oh well, who am I to complain? :) OK, drop me a message when you need me. :) And cool! I am so looking forward to it. I'm changing my major next semester to psychology, so I've been in the beginning stages of having someone help me go through that process. CarpetCrawler (talk) 22:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, when you send me a message asking for assistance, I'll see what I can do. :) And yeah, I understand how it is! Everyone can't understand something that they should be able to understand! Then again, there's a lot of things about Wiki that I'm not a fan of, but I still love editing this place. :) And yeah, I also went for the Patriots instead of my Giants in '08; I mean, I thought it was a done deal! But, alas, the Giants outplayed the Pats that year, which surprised everyone. Have a good one! :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 19:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

La Isla Bonita
Hey ThinkBlue, remember me? Well t ostart off, I've only promoted one article to GA as of now hence still quite new to GA standards. I'm now working on the Madonna classic "La Isla Bonita" for GA and have developed hugely. Can you please check it once and tell me what else needs to be done? Please help, I'm a little stuck at the critical reception section. --Legolas ( talk to me ) 12:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Brad Pitt PR
I left a list of comments on the PR page, and made some smaller copy-edit changes myself. I hope it's helpful. It's a rather long list, but I believe most of it could be fixed rather easily. <font color="#646060"> EnemyOfTheState undefined 13:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Scott Stevens
Hi, I made a lot of changes to the Scott Stevens article, which included a lot of your suggestions from the GA review. Is it good enough for a pass yet? --Sportskido8 (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Another GAN
Hey, ThinkBlue, its been a while, but I have another volcano article I'd like you to review. Mount Thielsen... can you get back to me on my talk if you review it, or if you don't?  Ceran  thor 20:23, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks. And by the way, Nevado del Ruiz, which I believe you reviewed months ago, is now an FA.  Ceran  thor 19:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Not to be pushy, but I'm starting a GA drive and I leave for spring break on Friday. Since you are online, could you conduct the review? I'm heading to the Dominican Republic for a week, so I doubt I'll get any internet whatsoever anyway.  Ceran  thor 22:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments resolved (know I'm violating the disclaimer but I have to get off and study).  Ceran  thor 21:20, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

We're getting so good...
... Mike Mizanin passed without us having to do any work whatsoever. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. Shame it'll take forever, huh? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I dunno. Maybe, but then on the other hand, this part of a storyline that's been going on since February, so... I see why it's there, and I see reasons for taking it out too. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 07:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, god. I never thought about that. My exams are over though, so I'm free for the rest of this week, if you want to work on it. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:10, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh poor you! I'm exam free 'til June now. :) Sure thing. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, secondary school, which is the Irish equivalent to high school. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

<--Alright. I'll get stuck into referencing. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I think the one of the two of them together http://www.flickr.com/photos/occams_razor/3004926769/in/set-72157608675427306/] (without the fans) would probably be the best, though it's a shame "iruleitstrue" doesn't have a photo of the two of them together, since we'd definetly get it then - that's Mshake3 in case you didn't know. Since the article is about the two of them, we should try and have a photo of the two of them together imo. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool. Yep, really. Well, that's suprising, he is male (as far as I know) :) We could put an image of Brie in the SD section, since she was the one who debuted first, I suppose, and images are never a bad thing! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea, yea. Most likely. So pretty much done referencing The Bella Twins, I jus want to look up some FCW results from 2008, and see if they appeared, 'cause it jumps from January 2008 to August 2008, so... Anyway, could you work on the lead please? Thanks, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Brilliant! Alright, I'm done. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Em, something like "Brie debuted first, and part of her in-ring persona was that she would disappear under the ring during matches, emerging revived. Eventually, however, it was discovered that she was in fact switching places with Nikki under the ring in order to gain an advantage". That's off the top of my head, maybe you can reword it. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

<--Ok. I've added it, though I made a few minor changes to the wording to avoid redundancy, and they're not actually wrestling in FCW anymore, so I thought it best to remove that from the lead. :) D'you think it's ready to be nominated? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I couldn't find a source, so I removed it. What do you think now? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, if you've got time. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Great. I'll take Adam Birch and you take MNM. That sound ok? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. This well-oiled machine shows no signs of slowing down! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * ...ain't no valley low enough, ain't no river wide enough... Sorry, I went off on a tangent there. Nice though! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

<--Why, thank you. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 07:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. Ok, according to thee titles it's Brie Bella in both photos, one's her about to get into the ring, and the other's her on the turnbuckle. Ok, you know that was a silly question right? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Women shouldn't have six-packs, it's just wrong... Anyway, no, I don't see a difference between them. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. I think there could be a slight difference in their noses/cheeks, but it's quite hard to tell because of the angles they're taken at. *shrugs* ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 06:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Delivered for the WikiCup by GARDEN  at 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC). Queries to my talk.

Good articles
Greetings! I noticed you promoted Mount Thielsen to a good article. Thanks for reviewing articles for Wikipedia! However, you didn't include an oldid in the template. (This puts it in Category:Good articles without an oldid for other volunteers to clean up later.) I looked through the history and added "oldid=280943429" to it, so no problems, but I just wanted to let you know that if you add oldid when you promote, it can save us some time. All the best, – Quadell (talk) 15:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Oops! It looks like I misunderstood. There is a bot that takes care of this automatically. Sorry to bug you, and thanks again! – Quadell (talk) 15:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Question?
Do you have a windows messenger account?-- Will C  00:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, look me up at wmhc818.-- Will C  20:48, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm online and waiting.-- Will C  21:12, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I should be online. What is you user name?-- Will C  21:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I sent you a message. You appear offline to me.-- Will C  21:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, where did you go?-- Will C  22:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, well if you want to get back on I'm here. Your decision.-- Will C  22:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm about to leave so just forget it. I'll talk to you later, see ya.-- Will C  22:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I believe you deserve these.-- Will C  22:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you both did. Maybe you all can do MNM next seeing as you've gotten two of the articles for that already at GA class.-- Will C  01:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Hope you don't mind
Hello ThinkBlue, I hope you don't mind, but I moved a page you created in the mainspace to your user space, the original article was located at Use:ThinkBlue/List of awards and nominations received by Brad Pitt, I have moved it to User:ThinkBlue/List of awards and nominations received by Brad Pitt, as the "Use:" indicated to me that you may have meant to put the article in your userspace in the first place? If not my apologies, cheers SpitfireTally-ho! 21:23, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XI
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:39, 5 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for March 2009
SoxBot II (talk) 02:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Its so Blue in here :P
Hey Blue, hows it going? What happened to the Heath list? You also have email.-- T ru  c o   01:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ha. Okay, I gave a pre review on the talk page. I also responded. Good luck with that format, since its not as used ;)-- T ru  c o   02:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool. As did I. Nothing much, on spring break right now, you?-- T ru  c o   02:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I needed the break too. Okay, I checked out 1 already, and will get to the FLC one later ;). The Professional Wrestling Hall of Fame and Museum with Nikki, you?-- T ru  c o   03:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Good luck with it, and yeah you probably will see me. I also responded.-- T ru  c o   16:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ha. Hmm, I'll think about it =D. As have I.-- T ru  c o   17:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * SUPER STRONG INFINITY OPPOSE =D. Your world domination..I mean mail.-- T ru  c o   23:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You should be =P Cool. Gotcha back.-- T ru  c o   23:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome, I shall see it there when you nominate it. I think you know the drill as well.-- T ru  c o   22:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * And I have smacked you at it ;) Yeah I did reply.-- T ru  c o   15:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay I will check it out, and you know the drill.-- T ru  c o   21:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Montel Vontavious Porter
Before you are quick to revert changes, you might want to review them first. My edit to this article, which you reverted, fixed not only the "centre/center" issue (as per WP:ENGVAR and the internal consistency section immediately following), but also corrected "fued", which is not a correct spelling in any version of English. Reverting it with the pithy "not needed" was incorrect.  Horologium  (talk) 21:52, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: Help
I'm not the world's best copyeditor, but I'll take a look at the article as soon as possible. :) Have a good one, and I hope all has been well for you! Carpet Crawler  message me  04:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem on the review. When I get home from work (My first day on the job! :D) tonight I'll take a look. :) Carpet Crawler  message me  18:54, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's pretty fun. I scan old documents for archival! Carpet Crawler  message me  19:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I never understood the name of that store. You know what I think of when I think of Foot Locker? Really, really stinky and sweaty feet. Also, athlete's foot. Who wants to go to a store that makes you think of smelly, sweaty athlete's foot feet?! :) Carpet Crawler  message me  19:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, I'm a sports fan too, but to me that's the first thing that comes to mind. :P And when I begin scanning old comic books from the 50's, we'll see whose job is more interesting. :P Carpet Crawler  message me  20:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Pft, I've been wearing my Starburys for over a year and a half now, and I've only had to go into the hospital to get surgery on my feet from wearing those monstrosity's 12 times! :P Carpet Crawler  message me  20:22, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the only reason why I bought them was because they were cheap, and I am a Knicks fan. :P I bought them when they originally came out, and was hoping that when I went to a Knicks home game, Steph would sign them. He didn't. :( I got close to saying hi to him, but the security guard pushed me away. Oh well, I never liked Steph all that much anyway. :P I LOVE comic books! :) As my userpage hints at, I am a bit of a comic book nerd. :) Carpet Crawler  message me  20:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ahhh yes, Kobe Bryant and the Lakers. Two of my most hated things ever. :P Carpet Crawler  message me  01:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

(Outdent) So far I've taken a quick look at the Brad Pitt article. You've done a great job! However, I see that the dates in the citations are not properly formatted. For example, if it says "Retrieved on 4-12-09", it should instead read "Retrieved on 12 April 2009." Same goes for the dates of the articles themselves. Instead of saying "(3-10-09)", it should say (10 March 2009). Check out how it's done at the No Jacket Required article to see what I mean. It's probably one of the more tedious jobs, but it's something that will more than likely be pointed out at the FAR. :) Carpet Crawler  message me  05:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL, I guess so. >:) And yeah, that's true. I accidentally forgot that NJR is an album by Phil Collins, who is British! Egg on my face there. ;) Carpet Crawler  message me  20:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That is a great read! :) Speaking of the AWESOMENESS that is Pearl Jam, it looks like someone is doing work on "Better Man"! Think we should message them and ask if they need a hand? A three person collaboration sounds like fun! :D Sorry if I take a little while to respond, I'm online but working. :D Carpet Crawler  message me  21:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, when I get home later today I'll drop them a note. :D Carpet Crawler  message me  22:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Lights and Sounds passed
Congratulations, the article Lights and Sounds has passed its GA review! View the talkpage for details. Thanks, and once again, congratulations on your great work! Carpet Crawler message me  06:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:
Thanks. Congrats to you too! Now, for The Bella Twins to pass, and then we have a Good Topic. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 12:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, it's not a virtue that I possess... :( ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:09, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course not. Let me know when. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 12:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

The Bella Twins passed! Shall we nominate for WP:GT now? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, no! I missed your birthday! I'm sorry! Happy belated birthday! As a present, I'll let you start the nomination proceedings! Though, I'm nor sure if that's a nice present... Anyway, here ya go!
 * From your friend and co-collaborator:
 * ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh shit, I did as well, though I didn't know, I still feel bad. Happy Belated Birthday as well.-- Will C  16:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. And, are you sure? What if I insist you do it? LOL ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, alright. Hang on and I'll send you the link if you want to watchlist it or something. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Featured topic candidates/John Morrison and The Miz. I'll let you pick and add the image. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Featured topic candidates/John Morrison and The Miz. I'll let you pick and add the image. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

<--Very nice. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. To paraphrase a certain former US champ, "ain't no stoppin' us NOOOOOOWW". Or something like that. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * *grins* Had to do a double take at the "very cleaver" you typed on my page. Took me a while to figure out what you meant. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea, I seem to have them a lot... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * OMG! A Cena fan... *runs really fast down the road* ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It would be most likely the person waving their hand in front of their face like an idiot... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

<--It looks good! :) Two things I'd say are: a) change "They have, at certain points been joined by other members, Mark Henry, Mick Foley, Jillian Hall," to "They have, at certain points, been joined by other members including Mark Henry, Mick Foley, and Jillian Hall," and b) perhaps add something about their reunion in 2006. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep, looks good! Nice job! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. I'll have it done before tonight. Promise! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ You did a great job with the article! There was hardly anything for me to do! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! Have you not? I find that hard to believe with the amount of excellent content you produce around here! Yea, here's hoping. I need to get my act together and finish the last section on Adam Birch. Hopefully I can do it later tonight, I got kinda sidetracked! Hey, will you write the lead for me? Pretty please? :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:29, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it made sense! :P Thanks so much. I'll knuckle down to Adam Birch over the next few hours. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 23:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

<--Aw, poor 'Blue! :P Thank you! It's much appreciated! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 23:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Alrighty, I'm almost done! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 00:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, I'm not sure. He's pretty open about it, so I don't really see why not, plus the whole "lead summarising the article" thing. Maybe just a brief mention of it would suffice. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 00:16, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Just a few things - 1) "Before being promoted to the main WWE roster, Birch was trained by fellow wrestler Jimmy Cicero" - emm, Birch didn't work for WWE for almost 8 years after being trained. Suggest changing it to just "Birch was trained by fellow wrestler Jimmy Cicero". 2) "Birch competed in various independent circuits" should probably be "Birch competed in various independent promotions". 3) "In 2004, Birch was signed with the WWE" should be "In 2004, Birch signed with the WWE". Apart from that, awesome job! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 00:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome. :) I'll add it now. Any chance of a copyedit before I nominate it? *grins* I know. Imagine what we could do if we didn't have lives! LOL Every pro-wrestling article would be a GA. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 00:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Oooh, that one would hurt! So much work, and so many vandals to ruin it! I'd really have to steel myself up for that one! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

<--Yes, if only Edge wasn't an asshole. Then we'd be fine! Hmmm, the problem with Rhodes and DiBiase is that there's no main article yet for a GT. Once the article gets created, and stays created, we could do The Legacy as a Topic. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC) <--Oh that's a good idea! Carlito and Primo, I mean Carlito's already a GA, so's The Bella Twins (managers), so that would leave us with just Primo and The Colóns to do. Easy enough! We'll switch this time! I'll let you do a bio, and I'll take the tag article! Just to keep it fresh! Or is that "not cool"? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I know. I couldn't resist it. Yea, the Primo image is pretty bad. Actually scratch that, t's pretty terrible... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:47, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome, awesome! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'm done, do a double check, and you're all set. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  02:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, did you mean to post that on my talk page? Anyway, thanks! Off to WP:GAN as fast as I can. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Aw, poor Blue! Wait, hang on - could swear I've already typed that today... *scrolls up* Anyway, I do appreciate it. And same here. You deserve more green dots on your user page! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:17, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

<-- *grins greedily* Yes, I know! 17 isn't nearly enough! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:28, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 40? You aim low! I was thinking more like 100. Though, if I ever got it, I'd be petrified! It'd be confirmation of the fact that I have no life! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL. Hmm, Divas? Well, I'm only a fan of Mickie James (already GA), Beth Phoenix and Nattie Neidhart. The rest all suck, in my not-so-humble opinion. Yea, being on wikipedia is fun! I had a great experience the other day - one of my friends, who doesn't know how much I edit wikipedia, and me were talking about the WWE draft, and she was saying how she'd checked the Mike Mizanin article, and she was telling me how great this article, that me'n'you got to GA, was! She couldn't believe it when I told her! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 03:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

"Rough Landing, Holly" GA review
Hi. Would you say I have made significant contributions to "Rough Landing, Holly"? I'm asking because I'm considering reviewing it for GA, and I'm not sure if my copyediting would count as "significant contributions". Tim meh  !  18:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Ethan Hawke peer review
Hi. I've left some comments at Peer review/Ethan Hawke/archive1. -- <font face="Trebuchet MS" >A talk / contribs 17:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, how goes it? Haven't talked to you in quite some time! -- L A  X  23:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That is good. I have been quite well myself. Just thought I should come back, even though I will not be as active as I once was. I will still try to be productive, however. -- L A  X  19:19, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You might want to check your e-mail. -- L A  X  12:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Heath Ledger
Hey there. I was looking over the Heath Ledger awards list you've submitted for FL, and noticed that the Kansas City Film Critics Circle Award for Best Supporting Actor award and the Southeastern Film Critics Association Award for Best Supporting Actor, both for The Dark Knight, that he won are't listed. I thought you might want to know that in case you want to add them. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XII
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 17:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Brad Pitt photograph
The Brad Pitt photograph you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons is protected by USA TODAY copyright and is not usable on any website without the express written permission of USA TODAY. Please delete the image from the site. Mick Cochran, director of photography, USA TODAY —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcochran66 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

"Fixing" dates
That is not really fixing. I was going by the format they specifically say to use at Template:Cite web, which is YYYY-MM-DD. The idea is to have references be standard in formatting, so all dates should be in the YYYY-MM-DD format (which is what I changed it to until you went and changed them back).  TJ   Spyke   21:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoever told you that was probably unaware of the Cite web template guidelines because it plain and clearly says to use the YYYY-MM-DD format. As for Cite web and Cite news, they are 2 separate templates for separate things. It would be like saying we can't use both Cite web and Cit journal.  TJ   Spyke   22:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Re
I still feel bad, I believe I remember you telling me once before. I should remember friend's birthdays. Mine is 08-18-1991. I'll be 18 this year. Also, what would you like me to refer to you as? Think, Blue, etc? Also, it looks like we are close in the WikiCup this round. Last time you were so far ahead of me I couldn't even see a small blue dash. This time I'm ahead of you, for now.-- Will C  16:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Crap, it seems anyone I talk to or am friends with anymore is older than me. That is weird. I hope to hear from you in a few months. Hey, you may not. I've got two articles at FLC, and one is about to pass. I have two articles at GAN that are bound to get reviews soon. Plus I'm about to nominate another article at GAN. Plus will probably nominate one at FAC when I find time. At the moment I'm on because I need a break from real life and thought to get some stuff done.-- Will C  16:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah she is, and about one month older as well. Yeah I have it watchlisted. Don't worry, things will work out. If you need my help I'm here. I'm trying too. I got work to do and other crap. I'm just in a weird place at the moment. Trying to leave but I keep finding myself on the computer. I hope to be gone by the end of the week and only on once a day for reviews, but something keeps me on.-- Will C  17:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Good luck with that. If you are 21 you should just be drinking instead of editing, I will. I need to leave for more important things. Like school. After I get that fixed, I'll be back and with a vengeance. I hope to be the in the wildcard again, and I want to win. Plus I have a bet with Nici, so I'll be pulling out alot of new content.-- Will C  17:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The linking thing was nerdy LOL. God gived me the gift of insanity, and yes insanity. I'm insane, not oh fake insane. No I'm losing it little by little. Picture Edge in August 2008 times 20. I'll scare you. I scared a friend of mine the other day. He was sitting there going dude, what the hell is wrong with you. It would make a great wrestling persona. Mix Raven, Cactus Jack, Orton, Edge, Taz, Samoa Joe, and Abyss into one. Add AJ's ability and Cage's, Foley's, Abyss', Daniels', Kane's, Edge's, and The Undertaker's promo ability and you got my persona. Crazy weird off his ass.-- Will C  17:37, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah it was. God made me funny as well. It scared him and made him laugh at the sametime. I like darker Orton over pussy Orton. The bar needs to be raised. The attacking the family thing was great. It didn't cause any problems. People need to go to that level of intrigue. More blood, more violence. Raise the bar. Controversy is the best kind of publicity. What pisses me off is WWE is killing all the tag teams. Carlito and Primo, Morrison and Miz, The Bella Twins, Hawkins and Ryder, Cryme Tyme, Kendrick and Jackson. They have two left. Vince has something against tag teams.-- Will C  17:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I like darker tv. I like dark gimmicks and blood. I love gimmicks like Mankind, Abyss, Cactus Jack, Raven, etc. I doubt. They have a belt and need more than three tag teams.-- Will C  18:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

re: Ben Laffleck
I don't know how this one slipped by me! Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Happy late birthday!

 * Aww, thanks! lol. You're a very nice person too! :)  The Le ft orium  20:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Nintendo task force membership
If you are not already aware, the Super Smash Bros. task force (formerly WikiForce Super Smash Bros.) has very recently been merged into the Nintendo task force (formerly WikiProject Nintendo). As a result, the memberlist of the old task force has been merged into the Nintendo task force's memberlist. In order to gauge who is still active and willing to participate actively in the Nintendo task force, I have placed all those members under the inactive participants list, which is located below the active participants list at WP:NIN.

If you wish to continue participation as a member of the Nintendo task force, then go to WikiProject Video games/Nintendo/left panel, remove your entry from the inactive list, and place your entry at the bottom of the active list. If you don't wish to be a member of the Nintendo task force, then simply remove your name from the list. One month from now, on May 16, 2009, all remaining entries on the inactive list will be removed. Thank you, MuZemike 14:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.  TJ   Spyke   23:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Ethan Hawke
Generally looks good. Two further thoughts: (1) Since the mistaken "thing" is in the quote in the "Stage career" section, a good way to handle this would be: "Whenever the economy gets hit hard, one of the first thing [sic] to go is... ". The [sic] indicates that the quote is accurate and that you haven't made a mistake. If you don't include [sic], most readers will assume that the mistake is yours. (2) I'd still prefer more variety in the images. Finetooth (talk) 03:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Section break
Yes, I am far too lazy to keep scrolling down! :P Candice Michelle, seriously? Can't stand her. Terrible wrestler, no charisma, totally overpushed. Only good thing about her is that she seems to be quite injury prone atm. Jillian Hall, hmm, I've never really seen her wrestle that much. She's used mainly as a tag team partner when they want to emphasise how good Melina or Beth or Mickie is or something. She's practically the Diva jobber. Yea, I know, some of my friends think I'm insane for editing wikipedia. They don't see the "point" and it's just a big waste of time to them. And then when they need to find out something, where do they go? You guessed it! :P ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I gotcha covered. :) re: email ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:40, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad I could help! :) Alrighty, let me know. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Definetly try and get the Primo and The Colons ones, they're nice shots, and the articles need good photos! The Carlito one is a nice shot as well, but it's less crucial, because his article already has a number of pretty images in it already. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, if you could find one for my recently created Eddie Edwards (wrestler) article I'd really appreciate it. Saves me the bother! Wow, I'm in a lazy mood today... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

<--Awesome! I'll pick and choose, and upload them myself! Hate to put you to more trouble... Yes, he is. Doesn't come close to Randy or Jeff though. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * True, true! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

NJR
Yay, finally the peer review has received comments. :) After the PR, I will send it to FAR and cross my fingers. :) How are things going with you? Carpet Crawler message me  05:28, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * :O OMG!! Happy belated! :) My birthday is on December 28th (THREE days after Christmas, argh!), I'm a few months older than you so nyah. :P Just teasing. Anyway, hope all is going well! How did that Brad Pitt article work out? Carpet Crawler  message me  05:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Have you tried sending a request to the League of Copyeditors, or whatever it's called? :) And I only got one response for the NJR peer review, but it did very detailed, so there's some work to be done. :) Carpet Crawler  message me  01:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed on working together, it should be teh uber in fun-ness. :) Especially since it'll be a music article (And the fact that you're a pretty cool person... ;) ) Carpet Crawler  message me  04:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * "Magic" hmm? Boy, if I would have known we were going on a date, I would've dressed fancier for such an occasion! :) Boy, my bad sense of humor rears its ugly head... ;) In all seriousness, I'll definitely drop you a message about a colloboration after NJR's FAR! Carpet Crawler  message me  19:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * So, what's up today? :D Carpet Crawler  message me  19:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Not doing much, either. Right now I'm at work, though later I'm sure I'll still be in the same boat as you, waiting for someone to review my GAN. :D I'll probably also still be procrastinating with the article I want to expand for DYK? at my sandbox. :D The usual, waiting and procrastinating, being a poet and not knowing it. ;) Carpet Crawler  message me  20:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey
Hey. How have you been? We haven't taked in quite some time.  Save   Us.  Y2J  21:01, April 18 2009 (UTC)

K, well that's good, I've been going well, just editing away (like you are). I've ben sort of busy, trying to get Armageddon 2008 to GA status, then to FA status (that's if I can).  Save   Us.  Y2J  12:08, April 21 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm gonna get to that. Actually, I'll do it now.  Save   Us.  Y2J  16:07, April 21 2009 (UTC)

The Michael Scott Paper Company
Thanks for taking on my GAN nom for The Michael Scott Paper Company. Let me know when you get a chance to review it. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( contribs )  23:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I responded to the comments, and also added a little bit more info I didn't have before. Thanks! —  Hunter  Kahn  ( contribs )  05:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the pass! Also, just so you know, I changed the title because as someone pointed out in the talk page, the title shouldn't have the word "the" in it. I fixed it at WP:GA too. Thanks again! —  Hunter  Kahn  ( contribs )  17:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XIII
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 09:41, 20 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Re: Happy Birthday to You
Yay, you remembered! Thanks a lot! :D  The Le ft orium  14:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm only 18. :P  The Le ft orium  14:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh right, I changed my age on my userpage a few days ago.. Forgot about that. :P  The Le ft orium  14:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Sure. We can do the pilot episode (even though I haven't seen the show) since it will probably have the most production info (conception, casting, etc). I will be busy today (obviously), but I can make a "draft" in my sandbox tomorrow that we can work on. :)  The Le ft orium  15:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, I've started the page here. I'm gonna find some sources for the Production and Reception sections now. :)  The Le ft orium  16:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, can you begin with expanding the plot section then? I don't really know much about the characters and stuff. :P  The Le ft orium  16:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Alrighty, I'll see if I can find it later.  The Le ft orium  17:34, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you think you could find any interviews with the cast members where they say how they got their roles and stuff like that?  The Le ft orium  17:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent! I will add the information to the article tomorrow morning (you can start if you want to). :D  The Le ft orium  18:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey ThinkBlue. I was going to work on the article earlier today but I got kind of busy. :P Anyway, I'm gonna see if I can expand the reception section now. I have access to NewsBank so I can probably finds some reviews (and ratings) there. Cheers,  The Le ft orium  18:30, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, that link is great. There's lots of reviews in the "Critique and Commentary from 1998" section. And sure, that Hayes thing sounds good. :)  The Le ft orium  18:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh, I usually have problems with that too. :P Anyway, I'll see if I can add some stuff from that article later. :)  The Le ft orium  18:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * BTW, do you think we should move the article to the main namespace now? It think it's ready. And we can nominate it for DYK.  The Le ft orium  18:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

I created the page here yesterday. What hook do you want for the DYK? (I thought I asked you yesterday but now I realized I forgot to save the edit to your talkpage) =P Also, do you think you could find an image for the infobox?  The Le ft orium  21:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, after we finish this one. :) Right know the lead (and maybe the development section) needs to be expanded and I'll try to find some ratings info.  The Le ft orium  22:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

What do you think of this hook: "Did you know that John Barrowman was one of the final candidates for the role of the gay character Will in the pilot episode of Will & Grace, but lost to Eric McCormack for being "too straight"?  The Le ft orium  22:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Meh, we probably wont have any use of the first season now anyway, since there is enough information for the article to become a GA. Is there any useful stuff about the final episode on the final season DVD that we can use in our "upcoming" article? :P  The Le ft orium  23:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice, I added the image to the article. Also, I have nominated the DYK here.  The Le ft orium  09:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, if you have a ref for it. :) Do you think we should nominate it for GA soon? (I'm gonna do a quick copyedit before, though)  The Le ft orium  14:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent, I'll nominate it in a minute. :D  The Le ft orium  14:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Done! BTW, where do you wanna start on the finale? In my sandbox?  The Le ft orium  14:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Just so you know, I'm a bit busy with other stuff right now but I will work on the article next week. :)  The Le ft orium  15:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Great, I added the information. :)  The Le ft orium  12:04, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Brad Pitt's high-profile romances in the lead (intro)
I am in agreement with you about the "several" part not being added (that is, if you feel that way). As I stated on Excuseme99's talk page: "I do not get why it is unnecessary to mention Gwenyth Paltrow in the lead as one of his high-profile romances. She has been there in the lead for the longest because she is a good example of one of his high-profile romances. He has not had several high-profile romances. He has only had three. The others before that, were not really high-profile. He was not even as famous then. Mentioning Paltrow as one of his high-profile romances makes perfect sense. However, stating that he has had several high-profile romances, as if every romance he has had since his acting career began has been highly-publicized...is not true.

In any case, another editor restored the article back to before the "several" was put in. I will talk this over with that editor to see what objection he has to my change in which I combated the 'several' addition."

This brings me to you, ThinkBlue. What objections do you have of my tweak to that? I mean, now that I think about it, that editor who originally added the "several" part has a point in not singling out Paltrow as Pitt's high-profile romance. Jennifer Aniston was also one. And the way the lead is now (as you have restored it back to)...it mentions Paltrow first as his high-profile romance, mentions Angelina Jolie last as his romance that has attracted world-wide attention, but Aniston is left in the middle with no being attribution to having been one of his high-profile romances. Flyer22 (talk) 04:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Flyer22 (talk) 04:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, judging from Excuseme99's edits and his showing up to change the article back to the way Lookmeupinla had it, they appear to be the same person (which I addressed on his talk page). Flyer22 (talk) 04:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Pilot (Parks and Recreation)
I responded to your GAN comments for Pilot (Parks and Recreation), but I also wanted to let you know I added a paragraph to the end of the Production section about the deleted scenes featured on the official P&R site. Please take a quick look if you don't mind. Thanks! —  Hunter  Kahn  ( contribs )  03:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Heya
Hey there Blue! Remember me? We were supposed to work together some time back but unfortunately my personal life got turned upside down. Anyway, just wanted to drop by - I am sorry I didn't keep to my part on working together. I'm back but just for the moment, just found my way back gonna spend a couple of hours getting into the swing of things. Hope all's well with you! -- Harish (Talk) - 15:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Starvin' Marvin (South Park)
Hey ThinkBlue. When you passed an article recently at WP:GAN, you also removed Starvin' Marvin (South Park) from the list. I'm guessing this is a mistake, since no review was conducted, but I wanted to make sure before I readded it... —  Hunter  Kahn  ( contribs )  01:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( contribs )  16:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XIV
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 14:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Nevada Sedan crater
I was fortunate to be able to have been given a tour of "crater valley" in Nevada and have photgraphs of a few things there. Would it be of interest to include them in the "sedan" article? Johnherrick (talk) 22:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Good topic ahoy!
We did good! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 07:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You too! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:35, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. Here's hoping that it doesn't take too much longer for Paul London and Brian Kendrick to get reviewed. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea, people don't like reviewing wrestling article unfortunately. I think you mean it's shame that Triple H didn't drop the title to Randy at 'Mania, like he freaking should have. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:06, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I actually downloaded the audio of that interview a few months back. It was very good! You should download the Mr. Kennedy ones, they're really good, and fairly controversial! I know, I really don't like the fact Randy won in a six-man tag, it makes him look weak. The only good thing about it was that he pinned HHH, not Shane or Batista, so it's a little better than it could have been. I thank you for the props! :P ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 11:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea, I stole the phrase from you *embarassed face* Cough, anyway, I'd love to, but can we hold for a a month or so? Today and tomorrow are the literally the last days where I'm going to be doing more on wikipedia than just checking my talk page and GA nominations. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 06:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

<--No, no, Awesome Wikipedian! I'll hit you up in a few weeks! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 07:54, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Brad Pitt article for featured article status
I do not see that much keeping this article from being a featured article. I have copyedited what I felt needed copyediting in the article, but most of the wording was/is fine (as in it did not need copyediting).

There is one part of the text I feel still needs a change. That part is:


 * In 1988, Pitt appeared in an episode of the police drama 21 Jump Street,[12] followed by appearances on the situation comedies Head of the Class and Growing Pains the next year.[12]


 * That same year, he made his feature film debut in the drama The Dark Side of the Sun (1988).

With that part, what I am looking at as a problem is where it notes the shows he appeared in the year after 1988 (even if it is only one of those shows) and where it goes back to saying "that same year." That needs to be a little rearranged, in my view. Also, once you state "that same year," the 1988 parentheses note of that year is not needed.

The only other issue with the article may be the linking done to that Brangelina article, which was recently done, as noted on the talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 01:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Be prepared
Gareloi Volcano is on its way. I'm not quite done with it yet, though, but I just wanted to notify you I'll have another GAn up soon.  Ceran  thor 12:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XV
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 08:42, 4 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for April 2009
SoxBot (talk) 10:56, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Will & Grace
Just letting you know that I reviewed The Pilot (Will & Grace), so you can check out my responses from the talk page.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  12:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yay, it passed! :D There's one thing that needs to be fixed, though (see here). Hopefully I'll get some time to work on the finale this weekend. :)  The Le ft orium  16:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, we can definitely do that when the finale is done. :)  The Le ft orium  17:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Dude, you don't have to apologize. There's no rush at all. :) I guess you can read through the plot section and see if it's good (and maybe do a copyedit/rewrite). I copied the current version from an old revision of the article. I'll do the reception section and then you can finish the production section once you get the DVD. Cheers,  The Le ft orium  16:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent, I will go through them ASAP and add the information to the article (you can do it to if you want to). :)  The Le ft orium  16:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, I don't mind.  The Le ft orium  16:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that might be worth mentioning.  The Le ft orium  16:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

"This Love"
Hi Blue. I think what you need to do is supply the length of each track in the tracklisting, and MTV News should not be in italics (in the references), and I think MTV and Rolling are overlinked in the ref section. That's all and its ready to go. Good luck. I'm a very slow now. Sorry. Limited connection. --Efe (talk) 12:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rough Landing, Holly
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Rough Landing, Holly you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. GARDEN 20:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Adminship nomination
Hi. I was wondering if you'd be willing to accept a nomination for adminship. As you know, I've had pleasant discussions with you, and I have seen your work, which is amazing. I was actually surprised you were not already an admin, and I'm sure you'd be a net positive if you were one. If you have no objections to my nomination, I'll create your nomination page and we can get started. Thanks. Tim meh  !  23:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Brad Pitt Proposition 8
Have you read this, from the Boston Herald? Brianboulton (talk) 00:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

WP:Good articles/recent
Hey. I would just to apologise for and explain the disruption you may have noticed on WP:Good articles/recent. Following a bot request, it became apparent that it would be handy to have a bot pipe new additions to WP:GA onto the /recent subpage. Now, I admit that the bot's been having a few problems (it's still officially in trial), but I hope these have now been worked out. It should mean that every 5 minutes the newest additions are added automatically, so all users like you have to do is add the newly listed GA to WP:GA and let the bot do the work. Of course, you're allowed to do it yourself, but you don't have to. That's the plan, anyhow, so it might be an idea to add the article to WP:GA, then wait ten minutes. If the bot hasn't added it yet, add it manually and come straight to me so I can fix the bot. Essentially though, you can either carry on as normal or take advantage of the bot, as you wish. Thanks for your patience and sorry for any disruption caused. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 15:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paul London and Brian Kendrick
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Paul London and Brian Kendrick you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Vicenarian (talk) 05:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC)