User talk:TopoChecker

Almeria Province
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Almeria Province, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Province of Almería. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:33, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * My mistake, fixed now. TopoChecker (talk) 20:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

1857 Map
Yes, can help you. Shadowxfox (talk) 10:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Added to Cundinamarca (disambiguation).

"State of xxxx " and "xxxx State"
Hola, he visto tus contribuciones y me he dado cuenta que llamas a los artículos de los antiguos estados de Colombia como xxxx State. Sin embargo esa denominación es incorrecta, ya que en español se traduciría como Estado xxxx. La forma correcta es State of xxxx porque el estado contenía dentro de su nombre la partícula de así: Estado de xxxx. (Tal como ocurre con los estados de Estados Unidos)

Otra cosa, el término ¡''Estado de la Federación'¡' como denominación de los estados entre 1858 y 1863 es también incorrecto. La constitución de 1858 declara que "Los estados de Antioquia, Bolívar, Boyacá, Cauca, Cundinamarca, Magdalena, Panamá y Santander se confederan a perpetuidad en una nación libre y soberana cuyo nombre es Confederación Granadina". Es decir, se estaban reconociendo como estados constitutivos de la federación, pero no se les estaba dando ese nombre.

Y por último, no creo que sea tan conveniente crear un artículo por cada escisión territorial que se le haga a una entidad. Por ejemplo, el departamento de Cundinamarca de 1820 y de 1824 podrían estar juntos en un mismo artículo, eso si aclarando que al primigenio departamento se le quitaron partes para crear nuevos territorios.

Shadowxfox (talk) 10:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Panama State


A tag has been placed on Panama State, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Baseball Watcher  Lets Chat  23:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rubén Falcón


A tag has been placed on Rubén Falcón requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Baseball Watcher  Lets Chat  01:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ramón Lorenzo Falcón


A tag has been placed on Ramón Lorenzo Falcón requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Baseball Watcher  Lets Chat  01:45, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rubén Falcón


The article Rubén Falcón has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Lady of  Shalott  00:51, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Traslations
Please, next time, YOU MUST TRASLATE completely articles transferred from Wikipedia in Spanish. Thank you Shadowxfox (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It seems I have not done this, but I don't even know where. TopoChecker (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Victoria (Western Australia) for deletion
The article Victoria (Western Australia) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Victoria (Western Australia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattinbgn (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Chihuahua (state)
Please don't change links in articles to a redirect. Wait until (and if) Chihuahua is moved to Chihuahua (state) before making those changes. Vsmith (talk) 04:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Juan Falcón


The article Juan Falcón has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Jac 16888 Talk 04:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Victoria (state)
Just added a fresh response there HiLo48 (talk) 00:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

thanx for Victoria in the Gallic empire
That's the kind of article I love to find on WP. And you used it to make a fine argument. Cheers! walk victor falktalk 05:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I saw that on the talk page. I have to call it a day now (or night) and get some sleep. But I've gathered a couple of links; if you're interested you can check them here: . So long. walk victor falktalk 07:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ...and I'll second that thank you. I like to learn something new every day, and that's a goodie. HiLo48 (talk) 05:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Bharatpur State
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Bharatpur State, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: History of Bharatpur. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Indian states
They should not be capitalised, unless that is their official names. See my comment at Talk:Jaoli principality. Perhaps you should get familiar with WP:MOS and [Wp:MoS]] in general. walk victor falktalk 00:15, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

en-1 English
Your user page says that you are "en-1" English, do you really only know English at a very simple level? Your vocabulary, grammar, sentence structure seems to indicate otherwise. 184.144.170.159 (talk) 06:51, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Tobias Conradi for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Note: I did not file this investigation; I happened to read it, and noticed that you had not been notified. JoeSperrazza (talk) 19:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Spanish provinces
I've moved the discussion about Spanish province categories to here. Please weigh in as desired.--Mike Selinker (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Date and time notation in the Americas


The article Date and time notation in the Americas has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unnecessary, unsourced and uninformative. Info about dates is at Date format by country, info about times at Date and time representation by country.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  07:59, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:Time in Kenya
Category:Time in Kenya, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Volunteer Marek  00:38, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Miss Bolívar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Bolívar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Miss Bolívar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 20:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Latin Union


A tag has been placed on Category:Latin Union requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

"Date and time notation in Taiwan" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Date and time notation in Taiwan. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Punial State for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Punial State is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Punial State until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Vitaium (talk) 13:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)