User talk:Tri400

Flags next to names of executives in infoboxes
I noticed you've been adding flags next to the names of executives in the infoboxes. Now I love flags, I think they can add a lot to articles by making it easier to get information at a quick glance, but adding flags for the national origin of executives seems a bit much. Is this really necessary? What value do you believe it adds? The national origin of an executive is not one of the most important things about them.

But also it introduces the tricky question of what flag to put for someone. Take for example Rupert Murdoch -- born and raised in Australia, but now an American citizen, living in the US. American flag or Australian flag? And I noticed on National Australia Bank you put both the Australian flag and the Lebanese flag next to Ahmed Fahour. Why? He was born in Australia, is an Australian citizen, and lives in Australia. His only tie to Lebanon is his ethnicity. Surely putting flags next to executives' names to indicate their ethnicity is not warranted. --Crocodile Punter 14:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I like to see the effective use of flags, and don't entirely agree with the essay WP:FLAGCRUFT, but these edits, like the one to Optus do appear to cause issues rather than add value - as discussed in the essay. -- Rob.au 13:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

What Issues?

The fact that the Optus leadership is not Australian? I think you have issues. Tri400 05:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I think you have seriously misinterpreted my issue with your edits to the Optus article. Firstly, you continue to cause collateral damage while reinstating the flagcruft, on your latest edit you have caused the following damage to the article (and not for the first time):
 * Paul O'Sullivan's position title is Chief Exectuive not CEO. Check the Optus website, the difference is notable.
 * Optus main offices are in Sydney, but they operate all over Australia. Hence why it is important to leave the (headquarters) notation
 * Secondly, I notice on subsequent edits you have become focussed on asserting the Singaporean nationality of two high level staff members, when this is genuinely irrelevant. The article is about Optus, not about the individuals.  The article already outlines Optus' relationship to SingTel, in that it is a wholly owned subsidiary.  With your latest edit I am finding it increasingly difficult to assume good faith in your edits.  Now that I have started losing this ability to assume good faith in your edits, I notice that the majority of your use of flags has been to demonstrate alleged non-Australians in charge of Australian companies.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a politcal tool, and this should be carried out elsewhere.  -- Rob.au 14:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I meant to add the summary - biographical information (such as nationality) belongs on articles about individuals and elsewhere only where a person's nationality is important to the subject of the other article. A person's ability to perform their duties is not impacted by their nationality, so it doesn't belong in company infoboxes. -- Rob.au 15:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Optus Headquaters and CEO
The article already says "Headquaters" then you are saying it again. That's stupid and its not on any other telco's page.

Chief Executive is CEO, those terms are interchangable. If you believe that they are not, point me to a single page on the web where it says they are different.

My point exactly is that foreign members in a management team can and does bring benefits to an organization. If you disagree with the wikipedia policy on the use of flagicons, that's your problem. It offers a quick glance at the origins of the management team, as on many other pages, especially if there is nothing written about the management team. Tri400 01:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think your point of "foreign members in a management team can and does bring benefits to an organisation" is appropriate in a neutral point of view encyclopedia article. This is not neutral, it is expressing and prompting a non-neutral opinion and as such should be avoided.  Please read WP:NPOV.  Further, there is no specific wikipedia policy on flagicons, just a strong body of opinion that under existing policies they tend to add clutter and don't add value to the article.  My stance is that your use of flagicons has two impacts - it adds clutter AND it causes the articles to be non-neutral.  This is a problem.  As for the position title, Optus refers to it as "Chief Executive" - this makes it the only accurate why to describe it. -- Rob.au 05:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I would also appreciate it if you would remain civil in these discussions. We have a difference of opinion, but there is no need to say "I think you have issues" or "That's stupid" or "that's your problem".  Please see WP:CIVIL.  By all means, disagree with me - but please be civil about it. -- Rob.au 05:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Paspaley
A tag has been placed on Paspaley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 12:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Deleted page
Which page are you talking about? NawlinWiki 14:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Death of Bob Woolmer
Hi, regards your reversion of my redirect and your comparison with the OJ Simpson case;
 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a newspaper WP:NOT
 * Information in Wikipedia must be verified and attributed WP:V WP:A
 * No original research WP:OR
 * Currently on wikipedia we have a problem that a majority of our 1.7million articles are of poor quality. Many are little more than stubs.

Currently the cause Woolmer's death is unknown and the subject of much media speculation. It's the subject of the media and so there's a lot of interest in it. This means there's a lot of people adding to the article. Having two articles means that their efforts are being split into two articles.

The best way to achieve our target of quality articles is to firstly add the event to the parent article. After the flurry of public interest and associated edits has slowed down, and we have all the facts (ie the official police reports are concluded). Then the article can be copy edited and brought to a stable state. The references can be checked and cleaned up. Then and only then are we in a position to see if creating a retrospective article on the subject of his death/murder/accident/whatever (we just don't know yet). In fact it's easier at that point to cut and paste the section out and write a summary for the main article than it is to clean up two duplicate articles and attempt to merge the section of the main into the sub article.

OJ Simpson's case pre-dates Wikipedia itself, and as such there's a large body of reference material that can be drawn upon. In OJ's case a retrospective article can be written as there's a lot of source material to write a retrospective quality article.

Just a few things for you to consider for the future.

Cheers, Monotonehell 17:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Because that would be counter-productive. The Woolmer article was already in full swing with the death. There was a concerted effort to keep the speculative rumours out of the article. The second article was simply a cut and paste of the original section. The main point here is that the creation of the second article was premature. We, as an encyclopaedia, should wait for the full story to come out before creating a new article. Otherwise we are being a newspaper. That's what Wikinews is for. --Monotonehell 18:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Pathologist
Can you please take care with this pathologist thing. The edit summary where you said 'first pathologist is incompetent Indian' bordered on racism. Indeed, I don't see any need to mention the fact he's from India at all as he's been working in Jamaica for 12 years and is a government pathologist. It's not as if he was specially flown in from India for the job. Furthermore, this pathologist thing doesn't appear to have attracted much controversy. Only one person has outright criticised him. Another said maybe it was mishandled but maybe it was just the way he wanted to handle things. From what I can tell, neither had even looked at the report or spoken to the pathologist in question. Therefore, this pathologist thing should only get brief mention if at all. And we have no idea why an additional pathologist was flown in. It isn't uncommon for multiple & more experienced patholigists to be used in high profile cases. Assuming it was because the first pathologist is incomponetent is grossly unfair. Please remember BLP. Incidently, I for one ruled out a heart attack fairly early on. One of the early statements from Pervez Mir mentioned blood and vomit in the room and/or on the body. For whatever reason, the media didn't pick up on this directly but it seemed fairly unlikely to me it was a heart attack. Nil Einne 23:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

That's not racism because i myself am Indian. Tri400 00:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Captcha-gmail-activate.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Captcha-gmail-activate.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 04:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Ratan-naval.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ratan-naval.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Narendra Modi
I removed your addition to his article. The references don't back up the material added. Recurring dreams 13:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. ~ Enviroboy TalkContribs - 16:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * That was days ago; I can't remember who the article attacked. I can assume it was the MPs if they were the subject.  I tagged the article as an attack page, meaning that it violated NPOV and fitted WP:CSD.  ~ Enviroboy TalkContribs - 01:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

WSJ India edition
Please provide evidence on the article's Talk page supporting your assertion that this is the Indian edition of [WSJ.com this]. One is owned by HT Media and the other by Dow Jones. The supposed "Indian edition" lists WSJ.com as a partner. --ElKevbo 19:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Nike, Inc.
The Nike, Inc. article received heavy editing today by new/unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 07:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Shahrukh Khan
Please stop reverting my edits and adding fangush. Youtube is not a reliable site according to WP:RS. And he was born in New Delhi, unless you can cite a reliable site o prove otherwise. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  14:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Well first off, the hospital in which his mother dies is not needed here. Please add quality information. Youtube is not reliable (unfortunately), that's Wikipedia's standard, and I don't think you or me can protest it. Therefor I request you to find that information in some good reference from a reliable site. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  14:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nike sponsorships
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nike sponsorships, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Indiscriminate list that lacks sourcing or any standards/criteria. WP:NOT

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mosmof (talk) 23:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nike sponsorships
I have nominated Nike sponsorships, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Nike sponsorships. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mosmof (talk) 02:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Franchising
Your edit cites a source that gives quite a different message than the edit. Reverting.LeadSongDog come howl  13:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Sharukh in Asal
Hi,you now that king khan is in the tamil movie Asal. |See this for more details. I sawed this news in other websites also. Please can u Edit this in Sharukh Page Under tamil films. I'am User:Br4011. Adminstrators blocked me. Because that i cant do anything Please. 124.43.43.71 (talk) 08:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Reverts
I reverted your recent minor edits in Tim Holding and Mandatory sentencing. I didn't think that either edit was an improvement to the article. Also, your comments explaining your changes: "the 7 network helecopter found him before the incompetent and underpaid Vic police did" and "They are scum of society, not "people" reflects a non-NPV motive in making the edits. One of the many great things about Wikipedia is that it isn't a soapbox, so we as editors should try our best to remain neutral. Wikipeterproject (talk) 21:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Savitri Jindal
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Savitri Jindal, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tad Lincoln (talk) 03:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Tad Lincoln (talk) 03:46, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Production of the Boeing 787


The article Production of the Boeing 787 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Minimal content already better covered on 787 article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilCat (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aamras (film)


The article Aamras (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication of how this meets notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 13:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Tri400! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:06, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ayub Khan (actor) -

IPL cricket
According to this source, the live matches will not be available in the US. Granted, the Americans are not very interested in cricket, but this is another example of premium content having some restrictions based on the user's IP address. People outside the US cannot access Hulu etc.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 09:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Your edits to Delhi Metro
Your edits have been reverted, since they were not relevant to the content of the article. Bombardier is a separate company manufacturing rolling stock and has no relation to DMRC, except as an independent contractor. Hence, the content that you added about Bombardier and details of its manufacturing facilities is out of context on the Delhi Metro page - although it might be relevant in the Bombardier Transportation article. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 18:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Sunny Leone
Please note that I have reverted your good-faith edit to this page as you added information using Twitter as a source. Please note that this cannot be considered a reliable source for information submitted to wikipedia. See WP:RS if you need more information.  Giftiger Wunsch    [TALK]  08:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Tri400, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --86.29.68.35 (talk) 03:49, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Articles for deletion nomination of PowerGenix
I have nominated PowerGenix, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/PowerGenix. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:44, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Recycling
Your article(s) on these subjects have been saved and merged in to Recycling.


 * Environmental Waste Controls‎ plc
 * I-recycle
 * PowerGenix
 * letsrecycle.com


 * :-)! --Wipsenade (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hotels in Gurgaon


The article Hotels in Gurgaon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a travel guide.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 16:22, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Abhishek191288 (talk) 04:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edit to the page Low flush toilet appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Jeepday (talk) 18:10, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Shower. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Although you added an inline reference, that was a bare link and to a commercial site not an independent report establishing that the new content was encyclopedic. Mirokado (talk) 22:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I have now reverted the update to Luxury good too. This had a similar advertising link and the rest of the content was inappropriate for that article. However, I think you could add general information about luxury shower heads supported by the wsj reference to Shower, if you wish. Please take the trouble to add a nicely completed reference, not just the bare url. --Mirokado (talk) 02:08, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

List of tire companies
This page is simply a list of tyre companies.

I have just removed your second contrib to that page "As of April 2010, tyres are no longer manufactured in Oceania." Please just add/update companies on that page only - anything else should go on another relevant page. Smoothgroover22 (talk) 20:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary&#32;for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Abhishek191288 (talk) 14:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Emphasizing what Abhishek191288 is saying, edit summaries are important to give others an idea and understand what you are doing, in turn might lead to less warnings. Using edit summaries are also appealing to other users especially if you are requesting for advance permissions like rollback. Though it is not required to use an edit summary, it is recommended that you use an edit summary to better communicate with others. Elockid  ( Talk ) 04:18, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Indira Gandhi International Airport
Please stop replacing direct links with redirect links as you did here. You have done this before on SpiceJet. If you fail to stop these edits, you may be blocked. I also notice that you do not bother to heed to other editors' advice. This is not considered civil. Please note that. Thank You. Why so serious? Talk to me 14:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to IPhone. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. &mdash; UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 00:49, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to iPhone, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. &mdash; UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 00:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to iPhone. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. &mdash; UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 00:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article 2011 Cricket World Cup, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. undefinedBill william compton Talk   05:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to High-speed rail in Australia. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.

Also, when adding references, could you use the cite news and similar templates, or at least add a title after the url so that the reference doesn't just show up a number, like this, please? Tim PF (talk) 21:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Hi! Let's look at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gurgaon&diff=442147063&oldid=442029837

The source does say that Gurgaon is a suburb. But this is in an American sense, in that it is a city nearby a larger city. In some commonwealth countries, a suburb is a neighborhood of a larger city. In the American English, a suburb usually describes a separate city (sometimes it can be used to refer to an outerlying neighborhood of a larger city)

Also your edit did not provide a source saying that the description of Gurgaon being a "suburb" was incorrect. Taking a source and making conclusions from it not in the source itself is called "synthesis" and that is a form of Original research WhisperToMe (talk) 06:25, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

NPOV
Please read WP:NPOV. I reverted most of the changes you made to the Phase-out of incandescent light bulbs article because the wording is in violation of that. Also check WP:RS, as World Net Daily is not considered a reliable source. If you make new edits that comply with wikipedia rules, then these edits may stick. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 23:06, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2012 Rowville Rail Study


A tag has been placed on 2012 Rowville Rail Study requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Solomon7968 (talk) 06:14, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 2012 Rowville Rail Study (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Caulfield


 * High-speed rail in Australia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to AGV

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited World One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Otis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Nike sponsorships for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Nike sponsorships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Nike sponsorships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. 72Dino (talk) 15:26, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Antilia (building). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 13:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hyderabad Metro Rail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Otis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=580542714 your edit] to Aerotrain (KLIA) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:42, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Part of the train track goes underground to cross the [taxiway]. The ride between the Main Terminal Building and Satellite Terminal A takes an estimated

Disambiguation link notification for November 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Chennai Metro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Lapa


 * Rapid transit in India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Bombardier

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm Darkness Shines. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Narendra Modi without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Darkness Shines (talk) 11:10, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Shrikanthv. I noticed that you recently removed some content from narendra modi without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Shrikanthv (talk) 12:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sacred Games (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Death of Osama bin Laden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PKT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Markandey Katju, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Provinces. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Newton Running for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Newton Running is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Newton Running until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Greenbörg  (talk)  08:27, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Newton Running


A tag has been placed on Newton Running requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Alexius08 (talk) 00:03, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Flabeg


The article Flabeg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability (fails WP:GNG/WP:NCOMPANY). BEFORE fails to show any useful coverage."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)