User talk:Veera Narayana/2016 Archives

Your GA nomination of Aagadu
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aagadu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aagadu
The article Aagadu you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aagadu for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Mahesh Babu
hello there please update the wiki page of mahesh babu by adding more information so that the wiki page becomes bigger this is my sincere request to you do as I say.

Congratulations

 * Thanks for this award! It could not be possible without you, Kailash, the Doctor, Jaguar and Corinne. I thank you all! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Congratulations Pavan. Did you check whether everyone's comments were resolved before Ian Rose (possibly) just promoted it without seeing much? Kailash29792 (talk) 04:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks Kailash. I did check twice a week ago and all were resolved. Dharmadhyaksha made the last edit 23 days before the promotion. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Congratulations and keep up the good work. This is just the beginning. All the best. Krish |  Talk  06:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks Hoping the best for you too this year!  Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Very good job!! Sorry that I could not participate more. BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  19:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! I can understand that SRK took a huge toll on you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations!

 * Thanks ! It is indeed a pleasant surprise! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:36, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Seconded, a hearty congratulations!!♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks . You were very helpful in the process and i really thank you for your contribution. has commenced the c/e of Malliswari yesterday and when it is done, i shall notify you so that you can commence the review.  Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I shall see it soon.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

The Hans India
Have you noticed that of late, none of its links seem to be working and that the site's robots.txt program prevents us from viewing their archives? But you can still find cached versions of the pages online. For that though, you'd have to enter the URL in Google Search and the cached version, rather than type in the address bar. Or this could say something. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You are right. When i tried to access this, it said that the article is not available. When i visited its cache version, i could finally see it. Archiving the available ones is a good solution for this, perhaps. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks a lot, ! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:40, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks for the barnstar, ! That was so kind of you. I also wish you the best for Jumping Flash! FAC Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Wish me luck too with my first FAC. ;) If possible, leave your comments there. --  Frankie talk 20:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Alright, i wish you too the best! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks and try to review it if you get time. --  Frankie talk 11:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Congratulations for your FA success. Maintain this spirit.Srivin (talk) 11:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks . And, i shall surely try to visit it soon, but i cannot guarantee anything. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:36, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Malliswari (1951 film)
Hello, Pavanjandhyala -- I've pretty much finished copy-editing Malliswari (1951 film). I'm waiting for a response to a question about the blockquote in "In popular culture" that I posed to another editor. I also have a few questions for you. Maybe tomorrow I'll read the article once through again to see if I've missed anything. First, let me apologize; some of these comments may not follow the order of the sections; they may jump around a little.

1a. In the first paragraph in the lead, I know you were selecting the highlights of the film's story and writing a summary, but I'm wondering whether you want to give away the end of the story so soon. Is that normal practice in film articles? I don't know. If you decide to remove that one line that tells the end of the story, you could flesh out (add a bit of detail to) the first sentence, saying that "it is the story of a young man who, against all rules, surreptitiously enters the palace of the king in order to see his beloved, and of the consequences of that visit (or something like that)". Then you are not giving away the ending. Just think about it, and maybe compare to what's in other film articles.

1b. The plot section tells the story well.

1c. The second paragraph of the section Malliswari (1951 film) contains some problems and needs work. In the first paragraph of that section you say where the filmmaker got his inspiration for the film: a Telugu play. In the second paragraph you describe the specific custom featured in the play (Rani Vasam); you write about it in the past tense, describing the way the custom was practiced in the Vijayanagara Empire. But, before the end of the paragraph, at a point that's a little muddy, you switch to describing the male and female characters in the movie and then the king. With this sentence (which I believe I put into past tense to continue the description of the ancient custom):


 * When a male was caught entering the palace to meet a girl, he was put to death by hanging

you begin the conceptual, but not grammatical, transition to the events in the film. In the next sentence:


 * But, in the film's story the king, Krishnadevaraya, forgives him and unites him with his beloved.

In this last sentence (and you'll see you have suddenly switched to present tense), you'll see the pronoun "him" and the possessive adjective "his", but it is not clear to whom these refer. You have only said "a male" and "a girl" in the previous sentence. "But" is not enough to make this transition. I recommend keeping the description of an ancient/old custom separate from a re-telling of the story in the film. (You've also got to make it clear whether you're discussing events in the play or events in the film.) You did so well telling the story in the Plot section, but here you've mixed some things up. Actually, I'm not sure you need all of this anyway. This section is about Production. You've already told the story twice before: in the lead and in the Plot section. The only sentence of this paragraph that's really about Production is the last one:


 * Narasimha Reddy made a few changes to the script and elevated Krishnadevaraya's character.

I would delete everything in the second paragraph except this sentence and put this sentence with the first paragraph. Also, could you please explain what you mean by "elevated Krishnadevaraya's character"? It's not clear to me. The only things that might be important to include around this point, if you have any material, is differences the filmmaker made between the play and film.

2) In the second-to-last section of Malliswari (1951 film) are these two sentences:


 * Differences arose between Narasimha Reddy and Bhanumathi due to the latter's lack of punctuality. Due to the delay in production of Malliswari, Bhanumathi had begun working in Prema (1952), which was produced by her husband P. S. Ramakrishna Rao.

You'll see in the revision history that I changed "began working" to "had begun working" in the second sentence. I assumed that one of the reasons Bhanumathi was having trouble being punctual to the Malliswari set was because she had already begun working on another film. If this is not correct, then perhaps we ought to change "had begun working" back to "began working" (but then it would not be clear whether there was any connection between her lack of punctuality and her work on the new film). If you're happy with the way the sentence is now worded, then we'll just leave it the way it is.

3) I notice that, although the title of the article and the film is Malliswari, several times throughout the article you have it spelled "Malleswari", particularly in the last paragraph of the section on "Production". Elsewhere, it is usually in a quote, and if it's in a quote, I guess it's got to stay that way, but if it isn't in a quote, perhaps it ought to be changed to "Malliswari".

4) The last sentence in the section Malliswari (1951 film) is:


 * After Bhanumathi's death in December 2005, K. V. S. Madhav of The Hindu recalled, "Even at the ripe age of 70-something, when she rendered her immortal number from Malleswari, "Manasuna Mallela maalalugene... " in that honey-dipped voice, there was no eye that did not turn moist at Ravindra Bharathi almost a decade ago [sic]".

I know what "sic" means. It means you've copied it exactly as it appears in the source, and any mistakes that are there are in the source. However, I don't see what is in error in this quote that deserves the addition of "sic". If it's one of those words in the middle of the quote, I think "sic" (in brackets) should appear right after the word that is in error. The reader will be puzzled by "sic" following what looks like a perfectly good sentence.

5) In the second paragraph in the "Music" section, you've got this sentence:


 * Writing for The Hans India, Aruna Ravikumar stated that Krishnasastri emulated the Indian Sanskrit poet Kālidāsa as a writer in the song "Akasha Veedhilo" where he, too, used the cloud as a messenger between two lovers.


 * (a) It's not clear to whom the pronoun "he" refers in "where he, too, used the cloud..." who is "he"? It's not clear. (If you mean Kalidasa, then it's not good to suggest that Krishnasastri used the image first, and the ancient Sanskrit poet used the image second: "he, too".) Let me know what you mean, and I'll help you revise the sentence.


 * (b) Why "too"? Who else used a cloud as a messenger between two lovers?


 * (c) What do you mean by "as a writer in the song"? Do you mean that Kalidasa wrote the lyrics for the song?

6) The first sentence in the section Malliswari (1951 film) is the following:


 * In his review for Filmindia magazine, Baburao Patel called Malliswari an "inspiring motion picture" which would "save us the blush when compared with the best of motion pictures of the world".

Unfortunately, I would guess that not one American reader would know what "save us the blush" means. I don't know what it means. I doubt that there is an article to which this can be linked, so I think, if you want to keep the quote, it would be a good idea to add an explanatory phrase after the quote, perhaps in parentheses: "...when compared with the best of motion pictures of the world" (meaning it would.....).

Well, that's all. Corinne (talk) 01:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. While i tried to fix the above four, i would like to explain the fifth and sixth here itself. Go through these and suggest me what to do.

Kalidasa is a Sanskrit poet of 5th century AD. One of his greatest works is "Meghasandesam" (a message by the cloud) where a servant of the divine asks a passing cloud to convey his feelings for his beloved, whom he did not meet since a long time after he was sent to exile by the divine for neglecting his duties. Coming to Malliswari, Malliswari asks a cloud to convey her feelings to Nagaraju. Now, the source says, "The great Telugu poet, playwright and translator Devulapalli Krishnasastri’s lyric in the Telugu classical hit ‘Malleshwari’ seems to have emulated Kalidasa in his song ‘Akaashaveedhilo haayiga ...". What to do?

Honestly i too don't know what "save us the blush" actually means. To contact Baburao Patel is impossible as he's dead. Hence, i want to leave it as it is. But, once again, what you want me to do in this case? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Malliswari (1951 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Malliswari (1951 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 17:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Only one minor thing to address. Looks in great shape. I saw the film. Good, but I think it was let down by excessive music which got a bit monotonous for nearly three hours.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, . I and Kailash have replied there. I am glad that you liked the film. I agree that the music was excessive, but i would prefer to call it an inherent flaw of Malliswari. Krishnadevaraya's reign was remembered for the contributions made to arts, music, and literature. So, a film which is made featuring him as the central character should mention those three throughout. That is why we have Nagaraju as a sculptor and Malliswari as a singer-cum-dancer. Well, what was your favourite sequence in the film? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Nothing really stood out in particular. In this case I think it was too much of a good thing.♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * For me, it was the scene where the couple talks to the king in disguise in the rains and also the climax where the king forgives the couple. If you are interested, please do try to watch Missamma and Manam. I wanted you to review them, but it could not materialise and West Virginian and Ssven2 took up them. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * With 1955 I might aim to reach 100 films at some point, watching Missamma will help ;-). The problem I guess with watching Indian films is that they're usually close to 3 hours and if you watch even 2 films it's like almost half the waking day has gone. Any idea why the films tend to be close to 3 hours instead of 2? I'm guessing there is a sizable intermission in the cinemas?♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Often yes, and not only do the songs and fight scenes add to the films' lengths, even comedy subplots often extend absurdly. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * , the present day films have a run time close to two hours except for a very few cases. And what all Kailash said are true, but one cannot blame the writer alone. For example, i cannot blame Arthur Conan Doyle for keeping some irritating subplots in his Sherlock Holmes' writings, it is his style and sensibility. But, the songs are restricted to two or three in Hindi films and four or five in South Indian ones. Yes, in the cinemas, we have a break of fifteen minutes. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 18:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Anyways, i would like to thank you all for helping me in making my dream a reality i.e. giving Malliswari and Mayabazar the honour they deserve. I also suggest and Kailash to watch it in their free-time, provided you understand that Krishnadevaraya is the central character and everything is designed keeping him in mind. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 18:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I do genuinely enjoy most Indian films I see, but with some of them I admittedly find it hard to be engrossed for 3 hours. Often it's fine for the more epic type films but sometimes the length is there unnecessarily in my opinion. The thing which annoys me the most about Indian films I guess is when a film should really be gritty throughout yet you get the usual song and dance numbers which IMO spoil it and make it difficult to treat it seriously. It really badly affects films which are trying to be those Hollywood type dark thrillers/action films. Sometimes it's interesting to see it but I wish they'd stop thinking that audiences all demand a song and dance whatever the film. I get that it's a part of Indian culture and heritage but I'm sure there's a lot of 20 something Indian males who would appreciate a solid crime, gangster film who like Lock Stock or Goodfellas or whatever without it.♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You are right. I remember you citing Kaminey as an example for that. I have a suggestion for the type you have suggested. In Telugu, there is a film called Raktha Charitra (Part 1 of 2) (120 minutes) which is available on YouTube with subtitles here. It is a gritty film based on factionism and real life incidents and really i could not find a lag in the proceedings anywhere. Few killings made me breathless, esp. in the first half. The second part is also a good one, but the emotions dominate the bloodshed. If interested, you can watch it too here with subtitles. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It does seem like the Indian producers are increasingly seeing a market for pure gangster/thriller films, but you just can't have upbeat song and dance numbers in a film about the underworld or dark themes, it destroys the atmosphere and setting of the film IMO. To build up to disaster or shady dealings, you just can't do that as it diminishes the impact of what happens later on. Even Bombay (1995), which is a great film, it would have been better if they'd not done that earlier on. The song and dance numbers are perfectly fine for the classic romantic comedy type films, I enjoy a lot of them from the 50s-70s period, but it's the modern crime films they really need to draw a line!♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * But the gangster film Billa II has dance numbers (one is set in a brothel, the other in a dance-floor; both have over-sexualised women). However, it does not have the cliched "hero-heroine dance in exotic out-of-story-locales" or dappan koothu numbers or any comic subplot. Despite being grounded and realistic, even with its fast-paced brief fight scenes, it didn't click. Guess it would have worked outside India. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

I agree with you both. But, the actual drawback of Billa II is that you know very well in advance that David Billa's journey would end up with a doppelganger replacing him after his death. In such cases, no matter how invincible and clever he is, it looks vain. That is why i love Farhan Akthar's work in Don and Don 2, though the former is nonsensical till the end, unlike the latter one which had less nonsense. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Malliswari (1951 film)
The article Malliswari (1951 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Malliswari (1951 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 14:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Temper (film)
Pavanjandhyala, you started to nomination this article for DYK the day after it was promoted as a GA, but never finished the process, which required transcluding the nomination on the DYK nominations page.

We were recently given a report that listed all nominations that hadn't been properly transcluded, and this one popped up on it. Even though the nomination was made last May, if you're still interested in pursuing it, we'd like to give it another chance. You shouldn't do anything to the nomination now if you are interested; I'll take care of the process of re-instituting it as an active nomination. Please let me know here what you'd like to do. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oops! I really forgot about that. Thanks for reminding. But i think it is too late now, and i am not interested in pursuing it. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for letting me know so quickly. I've closed the nomination template. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

PR request
Would like your help here. Thanks. Krish |  Talk  17:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I will surely try to make my presence there, when i begin fulfilling my earlier promises. See you soon! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kumari 21F
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kumari 21F you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 12:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kumari 21F
The article Kumari 21F you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kumari 21F for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kumari 21F
The article Kumari 21F you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kumari 21F for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks for the barnstar ! Once 1: Nenokkadine is done, i shall have 24 GAs (excluding Mayabazar as it is a FA now). After that, i have three options for my 25th—Revenge of a fly, Tale of a flirt's ghost, and India's first World War II film. I am more interested in the last and least in the first. But, as usual, anything can happen. What say? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You may edit whichever you find already well-developed (or having the potential to be). As for the last, a poster with at least 250px resolution will do, and there is no box office section there. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * All the three have potential. I don't know with which i shall end up with. If i pick the last, i shall change the poster. It requires to be written from scratch. The second is no exception. The first, however, has a good level of content which will be rewritten. But the deterrent is its complexity. And, i cannot afford such strain until this July as already i'm drained a lot thanks to 1: Nenokkadine. I will surely take a long break after 1: Nenokkadine turns a GA until May/June, mostly restricting myself to anti-vandalism and simple content additions. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Peer review
Hey Pavanjandhyala, I have opened a peer review for actress Kalki Koechlin after making some significant improvements to the page. I saw that you have reviewed a number of articles and this is unfamiliar territory for me, so if you could help it would be really appreciated. If you have some suggestions come up with them here. Thank You!  Numerounovedant  ( talk ) 13:17, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Cannot guarantee anything at the moment. Wish you the best. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

assistance on uploading movie posters
Sir, I need some assistance on how to upload images without being violated by wiki rules I have many cd cover images but dont know how to proceed through steps.

KingDiggi (talk) 17:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC) KingDiggi KingDiggi (talk) 17:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * First of all, i thank you for your tryst with Ilaiyaraaja. But, the problem is, your uploads and edits have violated the rules of WP:NFCC. Those rules are : Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information and Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. So, before uploading any file, please make sure you do not violate these two. Also read the whole ten criteria at WP:NFCC and they shall help you. Good luck! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for your reply sir, but i need a process for how to upload posters and cd covers through commons upload wizard, and i dont understand what those mean too. I need an assistance on uploading files sir

KingDiggi (talk) 15:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * , you should not upload CD covers to the soundtrack sections of film articles; you can instead add to soundtrack articles. And you should not upload non-free content via commons, but via the File Upload Wizard, who is interactive enough. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * is right, . Wikimedia Commons is only meant for free files, and anything related to a film is non-free (except when it is released before 1960). Unlike its name, Commons actually is a very restricted area. Try to avoid it as much as possible. I'm not against your preference to edit, but i suggest you to wait and understand what Commons is actually meant for. Hope you followed. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Kailash29792 Firstly, Thank You for your suggestions. I have uploaded cd cover of Rudhramadevi Rudhramadevi_Album_Cover.jpg, any violations and further suggestions please inform. If everything good i may start uploading other images too.

KingDiggi (talk) 16:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello
I have nominated this for the flc. I hope to get some constructive comments from you, for further improvements of the list. I would appreciate it. Thanks! Krish |  Talk  13:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Shall be there soon if possible. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Congratulations ! All the best for your future endeavours as well! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:03, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

GA Review
Hey, could you take up Randeep Hooda's GA review if you have no other commitments at the time? I go back to college in a couple of days and want to get the review done ASAP as I won't be active (once I go back to college), and the article has been of good quality for quiet some time now. Take a look only if you have time to spare. Thank You! Numerounovedant  Talk  8:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Due to some personal issues, i have stopped working on articles which i intend to bring to GA. At this stage, a GAR is not possible as it demands higher level of concentration. I'm sorry, and i wish you the best possible. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:55, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

vensatry has retired
You might have noticed this. Came as a shocker to me. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I did . It is surely shocking. He reduced his workload and kept a semi-retired tag. I thought he was too tired and deserved a wikibreak. But he chose to retire. Anyways, all i can hope is that, he may return again, just like Krimuk90 did. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hoping the same. WP faces a long-term loss when such editors leave. Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nuvvostanante Nenoddantana
Yo pavan. I have heard a lot about.your Ga contributions. But i feel this movie deserves a GA. Can you make NVNV a good article.

Sincerely, Kiran — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.15.223.80 (talk) 04:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks Kiran. I love that film. But, due to lack of sources, i had to drop it in the past. Ditto with Athadu. So, i don't think so that i can do it. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
I had resolved all your comments on the flc. So Please talkback there. Thank you. Krish |  Talk  14:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Ugetsu
With Ugetsu it's very much about spirituality. Don't expect to be entertained, but you have to try to appreciate the spirituality of it, how it can make you feel, and some of the sentiment. Even little things like how the water gentle splashes against the boat or rolling in the fields. I literally feel like I've gone back into the 16th century watching it. Like Seven Samurai, Tokyo Story it's one of those films which might seem a bit overrated at first but when you watch several times they get better and better.♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure, . I shall watch it sooner with a cool and composed mind, mostly tomorrow morning. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * There's a twist near the end where you sort of go "Woah!", it was a ghost! I don't want to spoil it though. I suppose the film doesn't have a tremendous amount of substance, it's quite simple, but the point I think is that sprituality and feeling you get watching it.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Quite interesting. I've found the film with English subs just now in YouTube. Looks like, "You've made me an offer i can't refuse". :p Most of the times, the simplest things make bigger statements, esp. in spirituality and self-exploration themes. I hope i can watch it today, if everything is fine here. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, if you click the white box first on the right at the subtitles will appear. Ugestu was included in the Sight and Sound top 10 greatest films for 20 years I think between 1962 and 1982!.♦  Dr. Blofeld  16:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You'll need to see Ugestu twice I think to really understand what is going on. You need the benefit of hindsight to get the best out of it. Once you understand who is a ghost you see it from a different perspective and appeciate the genius and the metaphysical qualities of it more. First time you won't because you don't have the know how what you see it.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * This actually reminds me remotely of Upendra (1999). It is a story of four characters who represent "I", wealth, love, and responsibility and explores the effects of those three on "I". The fact that these represent them is revealed only in the end. I could find that loud film actually very meaningful and philosophical only after watching it again, with a different perspective that the protagonist is "I". Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It's spirituality and the metaphysical with Ugetsu really, above sentiment, though both go hand in hand, there's a definite message being given about how to treat a wife and family and avoid temptation. What will really blow your mind is when you realize that it was his wife's spirit that was responsible for saving his life and pushing him away from the alluring manor owner and her taking him into death, and him returning home safely to care for the child. Once you get that you'll see the genius. I had to watch it a few times to fully get what was going on, I really didn't get that first time for some reason. But once you know what happens you can watch it again and see the story unfold like a magic picture book. It's really the sort of film like Citizen Kane which will get better every time you view it.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Visaranai
Pavan, just came back from watching it at the The Forum Vijaya. Do watch it when you get the opportunity to do so. Vetrimaaran (of Aadukalam fame) has outdone himself with this one! — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 16:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks like i've got to see something intriguing after RGV's Killing Veerappan. Will watch it if time permits. I don't think so that it has screenings in Hyderabad, so shall watch it in Bangalore (if i go) or in Home Media Release. But, i am curious to see how the Telugu police were depicted and what tensions it would create, if any. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it does depict the police in a rather negative light (for a good reason too). To think such things happen in our country. Tsk, tsk, tsk.....  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 16:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * One more thing. You are excited and that shows in the way you left a message here by deleting my conversation with Dr. Blofeld. I'm sure Visaranai is very special and i hope you liked it. But, please be careful next time. I would certainly be not so happy to see such acts being repeated again and my patience levels have been significantly reduced since the last September. I do not bother even if you call me a drama king. Is that clear, my friend? BTW, take care of your health. I assume that it is the reason for your reduced activity here these days.  Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Understood, Pavan. My eyes are quite alright, thanks for asking. Nothing quite serious. Enjoy Late Spring, Ugetsu and other Yasujiro Ozu films (I've yet to see them but I'll see them soon).  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 16:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Not today . I'm too exhausted at the moment. Late Spring is done, and i loved it. Ugetsu tomorrow along with Grave of the fireflies/Ikiru whichever is available with subs and is affordable (time factor). Apart from that, i and Vensatry had some discussion on N. T. Rama Rao regarding the validity of this file and a smaller one with Dr. Blofled the possibility to bring him to GA/FA apart from our reviews on Late Spring and Eega. He intends to watch Vedam, and i intend to watch Ugetsu. Let's see how it goes. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Hey!
I saw your comment on Dr. Blofeld's page. I think there was a confusion due to my text. I meant to say about Krimuk's outburst but it felt to Doc like I was saying that about him, which I wasn't. By the way, I am sure I will listen to you and your suggestion. Just tell me on which article you want me to work on? I will start work on that. Say it bud. Krish |  Talk  15:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * See, anything. Anything unrelated to the ones you love/attached to. It's like going to a holiday and leaving office and home back. There are many, many, many articles that are worth developing. Amitabh Bachchan classics are some good examples. Why not try any underdeveloped classic of his, say Deewaar (1975) or Don (1978)? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * And, the only way you can redeem this is to silently work on something and give it the status it deserves. The Wikipedia GA cup is going to begin soon, this March. And, many reviewers who want to take part in the cup shall search for nominations. Develop an article, nominate it, and if it is worthy, you shall have a GA. Think of it. Rather than messaging anyone, you can find the solace you want. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are right. However, it requires a thorough research and long commitment. It's hard to find sources for his films, especially production information. Krish |  Talk  16:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * What about this classic? It deserves to be a GA. Krish |  Talk  16:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Then just go ahead. Try to do. One most important thing is that don't deter if sources are no more. Just stop. You can have the satisfaction of making an article better than it was. For example, try to differentiate between this and this. Wasn't my work constructive, at least to an extent? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

S/O Satyamurthy
Please help S/o Satyamurthy Accolades section — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhysicsScientist (talk • contribs) 03:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Dum Dum Dum
Can you please tell me if Mani Ratnam was just a producer or story-writer for this film? &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 08:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Both. Ratnam co-wrote the story and screenplay with R. Selvaraj and N. Azhagam Perumal, aand co-produced the film with G. Srinivasan. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Screenplay too? &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 09:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Credits say "Story & Screenplay: Mani Ratnam, R. Selvaraj, N. Azhagam Perumal". Decide for yourself. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Ha ha, thanks! &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 09:47, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

1: Nenokkadine

 * Thanks for the c/e . Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Glad to help, and enjoy your wikibreak.  Mini  apolis  14:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1: Nenokkadine
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1: Nenokkadine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1: Nenokkadine
The article 1: Nenokkadine you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1: Nenokkadine for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Mayabazar
Though the article passed its FAC, it can still be expanded further (after all, Wikipedia is never finished). I found some sources: And articles that have significantly deviated from how they were during their FAC pass can always go through featured article reassessment. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * http://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/madhavapeddi-suresh-recalls-the-ups-and-downs-of-his-25year-career-in-music/article8252938.ece
 * http://www.dailyo.in/arts/rana-daggubati-period-films-baahubali-mayabazaar-mughal-e-azam-magadheera-rudrama-devi/story/1/5177.html (Written by Rana Daggubati)
 * http://www.bangaloremirror.com/bangalore/others/How-dubbing-came-to-an-end/articleshow/50608369.cms
 * http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movies/news/Sandalwood-dubs-after-50-years/articleshow/50612917.cms
 * http://www.thequint.com/entertainment/2015/11/17/the-secret-life-of-gemini-ganesan-as-told-by-his-grandson (Though its credibility is questionable).
 * I will surely do it. Currently my health is very bad, and i have an appointment with the doctor this evening. So, please give me some time. Thanks for the links. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1: Nenokkadine
The article 1: Nenokkadine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1: Nenokkadine for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks for the barnstar, Much appreciated! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Sukumar (director)

 * Thanks a lot, ! That was very fast! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks a lot, ! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Telugu Cine Blitz
This website seems to have HQ posters and stills for almost every major Telugu movie ever released, similar to the now deceased APtalkies.com. Have you been collecting anything from it? I'm also unsure if the poster used in Missamma was collected from this. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, i've been collecting old film posters from it and i uploaded them for many articles. Recently the website has begun updating info about new films as well, and that helps to an extent. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Kanche
Hello Pavanjandhyala: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Kanche has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the c/e. It was of great help. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kanche
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kanche you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 16:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

And promoted. Now go watch Rosemary's Baby to complete the agreement ;-) !!♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure. As soon as the doctors complete the treatment regarding my spine, i will be free and will wrap both Grave of the fireflies and Rosemary's Baby. I too am a man of my word, trust me. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Gundamma Katha
If it is a potential GA nominee, here are some refs you could use:
 * http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-fridayreview/old-is-gold-and-full-of-colour/article789006.ece
 * http://www.deccanchronicle.com/141212/entertainment-tollywood/article/another-multi-starrer-cards
 * http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-metroplus/vintage-theatre/article3189331.ece
 * http://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/interview-with-l-vijayalakshmi/article6860381.ece
 * http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/the-curse-of-the-clich/article5508027.ece
 * http://www.thehindu.com/lf/2005/01/31/stories/2005013112790200.htm
 * http://www.thehindu.com/thehindu/fr/2005/12/30/stories/2005123002330400.htm
 * http://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/telugu/End-of-an-Era/2014/01/23/article2015613.ece1
 * http://www.thehindu.com/lf/2003/10/13/stories/2003101301850200.htm
 * http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/news/Telugu-classics-to-watch-along-with-family-this-Deepavali/articleshow/17100912.cms
 * http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-metroplus/tribute-to-b-nagi-reddi/article5121549.ece Kailash29792 (talk) 04:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot, . Not sure how relevant, but i want to share what happened actually. I was frustrated last night and wanted to do something. I then remembered that i had a link of Gundamma Katha's special article in my photobucket and started working on it, only to reduce my frustration. Now it has 14 references. 6 more and it shall be 20. I am supposed to be on a wikibreak because of health-related issues, but i think i am working more now compared to the previous time, haha! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kanche
The article Kanche you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kanche for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 17:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Great people I met here
My tongue was firmly stuck in my cheek when I read your comment about me! &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 07:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That was not something meant to be offensive. It was a compliment and something what i felt about you during our interactions here. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand that. I'm surprised because, I'm receiving such a compliment for the first time! &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 09:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Haha! I haven't received none yet of such nature, but earned some strong brick-bats. But, i remember Kailash calling me the "Moses of Telugu cinema Wikipedians" when my 15th GAN, S/O Satyamurthy. was promoted. That has been the best i've received till now. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Madras Studios
Did you know that this book appears to have free-to-read information at great lengths? It even has for Telugu films like Pathala Bhairavi and Missamma. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks very useful for sure. If it works, then my next FAC is almost confirmed. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Let the identity of that FAC remain a mystery; revealing it now will spoil the surprise (I don't want this to become like another Jekyll and Hyde-type surprise gone wrong). Kailash29792 (talk) 13:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I am sure when you know its name, you will not be so happy. And, it is neither Pathala Bhairavi nor Missamma :p The latter may be sometime else. My second FAC is somewhat a smaller article. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Attarintiki Daredi collections
Hi, May I know how one movie grosses 187 crore if its share collections stand at 75 crore? For any movie share is always more than 50% and varies based on its collections in overseas/ROI areas(share will be less) and domestic area (share will be more). AD collected around 62-65 crore from AP/Nizam only for which gross would be around 110 crore. And remaining 10-13 crore was from Overseas/ROI. For this gross might be around 25 crore. AD's pre-release business was around 50 crore. Adding pre-release business might satisfy the figure. PK talk 07:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay. But i am confused how Attarintiki Daredi became the highest "grossing" Telugu film with a figure of 130 crores when the previous highest grosser Magadheera stands with 150 crores? It's share was also nearly 73 crores, wasn't it? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * AD became highest grossing Telugu film by beating Magadheera's Telugu version's share collections. At the time when AD released, industry was majorly talking about share collections. And Magadheera's all version' collections were around 85 crore. It achieved this feet in long run. But AD collected this amount in just 2 weeks. Note that distributors get high in first week and share will be reduced in further weeks. PK talk 08:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. However, i see three issues with this. One, according to your explanation, Attarintiki Daredi crossed the share collections of Magadheera. Then, why we use "grossing", even after the gross figures have come out, why Attarintiki Daredi is still higher than Magadheera? Second, the article by Business Standard explicitly states "'Attarintiki Daredi' was the biggest movie release of 2013. The movie earned revenues of almost Rs 187 crore across 1,200 screens with an occupancy rate of 100 per cent across several screens in Andhra Pradesh". Is any term or something similar saying that pre-release revenues such as sale of satellite rights, etc. is included? Business Standard is a reputed newspaper whose reliability cannot be questioned. Still, if i hold your argument true, i want to ask how can i believe in the figures released by Andhra Box Office? One example of farce is this: Here, "according to ABO", Srimanthudu third week gross is 156 crores. But its final run number "according to ABO" is 145 crores. This is the source. When the same ABO spoke to IANS here, the gross value was 200 crores. How can i believe in its estimates in such cases?
 * I am not against changing the values there. In fact, that would let me give an appropriate presentation. But, everything in this case is very ambiguous. So, i can do something similar to what we do in the case of a film's budgets. At the "gross" parameter, i will type ₹1.3—1.87 billion and shall attach a footnote. The content of the note shall be "International Business Times India estimates the final gross values as ₹1.3 billion, whereas Business Standard estimates the final gross value as ₹1.87 billion". The text in the footnote shall be cited with verifiable sources. Do you think that is appropriate? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I can answer one thing. Whether it is gross collections or share collections we use "grossing", we won't use "sharing". And most of the tollywood sites still publishing the share figures only. That's why AD is the highest grossing film. Films like Bahubali made it to national and international level where collections are showed in "gross" figures, which turned Tollywood to count on gross figures. But there are very few reliable sources, in case of tollywood gross figures. But we have to believe some, which come close to estimated figure while projecting from share collections.
 * I can't say ABO is reliable. I am noticing ambiguous statements from that site. I have no sources to justify my figures except my belief. The solution you provided may serve as the best solution. Thank you. PK talk 13:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That's fine then, . I shall implement that ASAP. Thanks for the discussion. I appreciate that, as we see mindless reverts and edit warring over issues like this where one can talk and clear the things. Happy editing! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you . PK talk 13:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Laptop with video chat and wifi
This one got me laughing out of control. But I am unsure whether it qualifies as an internet phenomenon or is worth adding here. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Really, that was something really good. The same fact is written in a very sober and mature way in The Hindu. I didn't add it during its GAN stages itself because that was not really noteworthy. I mean, what should i write? In the legacy section: "Mayabazar is considered a classic in Telugu cinema for its use of technology. This film featured a box that was similar to a laptop and the song "Neevena" was similar to video chatting in Skype in the 1950s". I agree Mayabazar is an effort of sheer human genius. But this line would end up ridiculing everything, completely. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Gundamma Katha

 * ❌ - Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It's okay. Thanks for whatever you've done till now. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Indian
you can use Indian, but is a war drama film, not out and out war film, stop being abusive please. Vakthruthva (talk) 14:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you please explain how my edits were abusive? War drama does redirect to war film, and in general, the trauma showcased in war films is similar to the one generated by drama films. That was why i changed the wording. Where was i abusive? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

war drama film
I agree with you, war drama film is being redirected to war film is okay, I agree with you. Secondly, your edits are not abusive, you actually wanted Indian Telugu film to be retained, I agree with you. Vakthruthva (talk) 15:08, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Kalki Koechlin
Hey! I nominated Kalki Koechlin's article for WP:FA, and I would appreciate your comments on the article!(If you have some time to spare) Thank you! Numerounovedant  Talk  11:36, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * , I suppose you read the notice above? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:41, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I should be more aware! Numerounovedant   Talk  11:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sukumar (director)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sukumar (director) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sukumar (director)
The article Sukumar (director) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sukumar (director) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Gundamma Katha

 * Thanks for completing the c/e. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks . It was never developed with an intention to make it a GA. I wanted to ensure that the filmography can warrant its existence if the parent article is considerably developed in size. Strangely, the FLC plans turned futile and it became a GAN. So, it is "accidentally" my first BLP-related GA. I wish you the best for RJ Balaji as well. I assume its is your first attempt at BLPs. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:24, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gundamma Katha
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gundamma Katha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 09:41, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Glen tea
Hi Pavan, will review your article shortly, though I feel I must see the film first, that OK if I do? On the tea, I was wondering if you know somebody on here who lives in Sri Lanka or if you get Glen Pure Ceylon Tea where you live. Last few days I've been taking lemon tea which I'm finding very beneficial for my health, but I've run out. I find if I eat the tea itself too it produces some wonderful benefits, seems to have very strong antibiotic properties. It was bought in Sri Lanka. Over here they only do Lemon and ginger tea. I was wondering if you or a page stalker could help. I'd be willing to pay somebody to dispatch a load of it to the UK!♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:38, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Watching Gundamma Katha now, will review it this afternoon.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:42, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for watching the film and i am glad that you liked it. Coming to the tea, i am really humbled to see that you fInd me a friend who can be helpful, something i shall be grateful for. Any Wikipedian from Tamil Nadu or Kerala may be helpful to you in this case. Pinging, , and for any response. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * What a coincidence. I'm a lemon tea man myself! Why don't you try taking Lipton Lemon Tea? It's quite good.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 14:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Doesn't it have sugar in it though? I've also started eating lemons and I'm amazed how they make me feel. I can see why Edmund Hillary said he couldn't have climbed Everest if it wasn't for lemons!♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Pavan, I'm coffee-freak (and a 'tea'totaller). :) &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 15:57, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Same here. I prefer coffee to tea always, but i am not averse to the latter. I just consume it very rarely. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Coffee, aside from a black coffee for breakfast always leaves me feeling sluggish. If I have a cup in the afternoon I feel tired and have cut that out!♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Well, the weather in the Britain could have been one of the reasons. It is not that i hate tea, i consume it rarely because i never tried to get habituated to the same. Even the coffee i drink, is only when i travel. At home, except for few days, neither coffee nor tea. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I forever prefer coffee to tea. I tried tea once, but disliked it due to the leafy taste. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gundamma Katha
The article Gundamma Katha you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gundamma Katha for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 17:21, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Indian films
I do enjoy a lot of the Indian films but a major criticism is really excessive talking and music which seems common to a lot of the Telugu/Tamil ones. It can get a bit irritating when they don't pause for breath in a film nearly 3 hours long. And they talk very quickly too, the scripts must be enormous. Some of the directors should take some tips from Ray/Kurosawa that talking is not always necessary!♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:18, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * IMHO, the songs which help the film's narration can stay, which surely aren't dance numbers always. Siva (1989) is one of the most grittiest crime films India has ever witnessed (no exaggeration this is). It challenged every stereotype Indian films had, mainly restricting the use of dialogues. If the songs (which were melodious nevertheless) were removed, Siva could have been more better. I've seen films like Gaganam (2011) where there were no songs and romance, the point is very straight. In films like Arya 2, where the protagonist's character is not very easy to understand, four out of six songs try to take the film's story forward and the last explains the psyche of the lead, which was commendable though two were dance numbers. But there were two songs—one in a pub (great dancing nevertheless) and an item number (absolutely no harm if skipped) which were of no real use. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * When it comes to Indian films completely lacking songs, dances, subplots, exaggerated action sequences and a "mass hero", there is Andha Naal. I know Blofeld reviewed it, but I wonder if he saw it. Almost no artistically realistic Indian film that has eschewed such commercialism has clicked at the box office. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * He didn't, i guess. The plot description remotely resembles Kurasowa's Rashomon, and i observe that it has got a notable mention in the article and its talk page. In the recent past, Nagarjuna's Manam and Mohanlal's Drishyam are the films which i like; they aren't offbeat and artistic, but are surely different from the regular mindless films with harebrained characterisations. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Most contemporary Malayalam films (Drishyam being one of them) hardly have any songs and are pretty much Hollywood-like in terms of story and screenplay. Even a lot of Tamil films today are focussing more on songs that go with the narrative (Santhosh Narayanan being very prominent in that front). But as long as Ajith Kumar and Vijay continue their commercialism, Tamil cinema might forever follow the sappy romance, stereotypical duets in foreign locations etc. It's time glitz and glamour went past. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 05:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That ain't easy, ! The "tradition" of duets and songs began in this supposed way (as suggested by few film historians). In the very early days, Indian theatre groups mostly staged plays based on mythology and nationalism. Now, these two concepts (apparently) required a lot of energy, hence poems and songs were introduced. Once the talkies began, songs and poems entered films because the filmmakers were the ones from these theatres. I can confidently say that until the late 1950s, Indian cinema was solely dependent on mythology. Slowly poems saw a decline as our filmmakers, writers, and even poets started looking at English literature, esp. the ones by William Shakespeare. From a film with minimum ten songs, we came a long way to six or five. Depending on the concept of the film, the number of songs can be altered, but they can never be removed. And outright commercialism is not always wrong. Remove "Khaike Paan Banaraswala" and see Don (1978), and indeed the second half becomes too tight and exhausting. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * South Indian cinema has a great chance to minimise the use of songs in films. Mollywood has already done so and it's being very much recognised on a global level. Commercialism isn't wrong, just don't keep dishing out the same thing repeatedly (eg. these so-called "comedy-horror" films are just grotesque). Stop making them for a good while and do something out-of-the-box. That's why the world celebrates people like Martin Scorsese and Christopher Nolan. They make films that provide both complexity and entertainment. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 06:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd say Nolan makes art-housey movies look like blockbusters and vice versa. Back here, it is surprising that Ajith, despite his mass-hero reputation, advised Gautham Menon to make Yennai Arindhaal as he liked and not to succumb to fan interests. MGR did the same for Anbe Vaa, but I don't think Vijay did the same for Yohan: Adhyayam Ondru, the main reason it was shelved. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Anbe Vaa is one of my most favourite MGR films, mainly because it was devoid of political themes and it was a joyful ride throughout with excellent music from MSV to support it. Yeah, Ajith is more open to doing complex roles, one of the main reasons he's won 3 filmfare awards (Kireedam, Villain and Varalaru are pretty good examples). Its VIjay who really needs to shed his commercial hero tag for a good while (He tried it with Kaavalan and Nanban, but even there too, some of his commercial gimmicks were clearly seen (his brilliant dancing for instance)). What about the Vijay who did Friends? Where has he gone to? —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 07:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Why always people say that films of MGR, Rajinikanth and Vijay have political themes? It was said that satires were thrown on Jayalalitha in Padayappa. I've seen both Yennai Arindhaal and Kaththi. They were director's films, not the actor's. If not for GVM, Yennai Arindhaal could also have been dealt in the regular way. In Telugu, Oopiri is the film i look forward to this year, as Nagarjuna is playing a paraplegic in it (an official adaptation of The Intouchables). In Hindi, it is SRK's Fan for now. What surprises me is that Pawan Kalyan has announced retirement from acting and would complete his current assignments. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * What? Power Star is retiring? He's just 44 (45 this year). Even Cary Grant retired at 62 only. Surely he can stay here for another 5 years (looks fit enough). BTW, MGR had plans to enter into politics, hence his films had a lot of political themes.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 11:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I know that would be a not so happy news for his admirers (i assume are), but he has confirmed this in an interview with Anupama Chopra. Here is the print article about the same and you can watch the video to realise that his on screen persona is extremely opposite to what he is (the three part interview is in English, don't worry :)). But yes, before leaving, he is making a sort of Hindi debut with the dubbed version of Sardaar Gabbar Singh (Eros is the culprit :p). Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

The Tamil/Telugu ones from the 50s and 60s I was talking about. There's a lot of dialogue and a lot of songs. It takes quite a lot of out of you watching one as they have so much content, and often close to 3 hrs! They tend to talk extremely quickly too, rapid exchanges in conversation punctuated by music numbers. I wish some of them were a little more moderate in delivery that's all. Most of the Hollywood ones near 3 hrs tend to be the more epic ones, slower paced, more time to take in scenery and other elements. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Most of them are along the lines of Hollywood epic films w.r.t the length. Pavan has stated the reason for lot of songs in Tamil/Telugu films from the 50s and 60s ("That ain't easy, !....."). See Andha Naal if you want to see a songless classic film noir, and the contemporary tamil films I mentioned to you on your Great Films talk page.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 12:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't mind so much a lot of songs, it's the excessive talking and pace that they speak I don't like. If you compared a Hollywood epic script from a 3 hr film to a Telugu/Tamil one I reckon it would be near twice the length if you include song lyrics.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You're right about the more epic ones though. They do take their time to set in gently. Tamil and Telugu can be difficult to follow for those who don't know the languages. The reason may also be the rather poor video quality for some of the films too. As for the script, song sequences are generally filmed after the main story. Try some of the Tamil films of the late 70s to mid 80s, they take more time to set in w.r.t to dialogues. Most actors focus on method acting (courtesy of Sivaji Ganesan), hence try to make their characters believable. A famous personality did say in this film, "A Japanese will die if he/she doesn't work. A Chinese will die if he/she doesn't gamble. A European/American will die if he/she doesn't feel proud of himself. An Indian will die if he/she doesn't talk.". —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 12:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I wish there was more like you see at 1 hr 40 range in Pasamalar, stopping speaking and enjoying the scenery and movement. For me a truly great film has to have a balance between the visual and time to reflect and dialogue. Generally I prefer minimalism or reasonable moderation in speaking and more attention to poetic elements like you get in a lot of the Japanese ones. Slower paced, something that you can watch and really reflect/relax with. The criticism I have of a lot of these films is that they're largely rapid fire dialogue punctuated by songs, not much of a good balance overall with the visual and background elements. Some of the Indian ones I rated more highly were ones with more attention to the other I think. All of the great directors know that you can tell a story on film through the visual and not just rely on dialogue.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:19, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * After observing this conversation clearly, i suggest and  to try to watch Siva (1989) and revisit Andha Naal (1954) if you guys have watched it. I'm sure they will not disappoint you even if they (may) fail to impress. I hope someday i can see Indian films with a runtime of around 100 minutes, at least 130. I don't think it is not possible, as we see films here down South with a duration of around 120—140 minutes. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:28, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I guess. But one must also take note that most actors are from the theatre and folk art people. That influence will reflect in their on-screen performance (can be a tad irritating but it's their slang), each of them have a different slang. If you want moderation, do really try Balachander's 70s films (you have seen Apoorva Raagangal) along with P. Bharathiraja's and K. Bhagyaraj's films in the late 70s to mid 80s. BTW, Pavan, Kaaka Muttai, Irudhu Suttru and Visaranai have only 109, 109 and 118 minutes duration respectively and Thoonga Vanam has exactly 127 minutes. 120-140 minutes isn't too bad. It's those above 150 minutes that take your toll.   —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 12:31, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Kaaka Muttai and Visaranai are out-of-the-blue films (the latter was spine chilling), i haven't watched the former and Irudhu Suttru. Thoonga Vanam is Haasan's "quickie" (he promoted it that way). Above 150 cannot be frustrating always if the concepts are good; certain concepts demand such lengths. Drishyam is a very good example for this. Kadal is a great example for the opposite. Anyways, do watch Siva (1989) and let me know what you felt. Not compulsory/mandatory, but surely recommended for someone who wants to watch a film with a difference. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

That's a very good point, yes, a lot of the time it does seem like theatre on film and the directors forget that in the film medium there are other ways to develop a story and mix it up. I don't mind watching one or two of the older "rapid fire" ones, but I think it's best if I watch one and then move onto another era and come back at another time, rather than a lot from each era at once. I've seen a few from yours/Pavan's list in the last few days from 50s/60s and have noticed this more that's all. It's not so much the length that really bothers me, I mean I sat through the 5 hr + 1900 quite easily. It's the content of the films, and nearly three hours of rapid dialogue and masses of songs is a little tiring to watch, even if I enjoy a lot of it! It's the pace of the speaking I think which grates on me, at times they really don't shut up and it gets annoying. You can watch two or three Hollywood films in succession from that period quite easily, many of them are often 80 or 90 minutes, but I'd say watching one Indian film from that period is the equivalent to watching about three or even four average Hollywood films from that period in terms of content. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you are quite right there. I'm used to it anyhow. You can also blame it on the poor quality of the film too (film preservation are usually not as greatly done like Karnan, Thiruvilaiyadal and Thillana Mohanambal, the colour films are not that bad really, it's the black-and-white films that really get on your nerves, because of the poor quality).  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 13:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Nono, it's nothing to do with black and white or quality. It really is the excessive talking. Next time you really watch one of the films, you analyse what percentage of the film is rapid dialogue/music numbers and how much is dedicated to the visual and relief and you'll understand more where I'm coming from. Pasamalar had some great scenes, and most of those IMO were when the rapid speaking stopped or slowed down and you can really enjoy the environment of the film.♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Not all of them suffer from it though, Pava Mannippu  had a better balance and more moderation in places in dialogue and was easier to watch, despite being over 3 hrs.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Yes, it passed just one day after Sukumar did. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That was a sheer coincidence, really. It is one of the charming Telugu films of the bygone era i've ever seen, mainly due to N. T. Rama Rao's performance. Thanks for the barnstars! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Mayabazar novelisation
User:PhysicsScientist added Mayabazar to the category Films adapted into novels, claiming "Raavi Kondala Rao novelised the film" in his edit summary. I checked this source which reads, "Akkineni released a book written by Ravi Kondala Rao converting the film's script into a novel, based on the screenplay by its legendary director K.V. Reddy". The source has not yet been used in the article, so where do you think it will fit? Kailash29792 (talk) 14:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * My guess it can be used in the Legacy section. Your call, Pavan.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 14:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

I would prefer to add it in the Release sections because of the following reasons.
 * This fact is not historically significant. For example, Malliswari is the "first" film script to be serialised in Vijayachitra magazine. This, however, was novelised in 2007.
 * But, this is not trivial enough to ignore.
 * The release section contains information about awards, film festivals where it was screened, felicitations etc. Adding this fact will not be a burden to it.

This fact should be summarised in the lead section once you add it in the article. If you feel that adding it in legacy is appropraie, please go ahead. Any one of you two can add this, since you are the co-nominators.

A special thanks to in this regard for helping us give a meaningful addition to this article.

Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Missamma
Do you have any source which states Missiamma (the Tamil version) was released during Sankranthi season? Because I couldn't find any. I found this, which states it was released on Pongal while this states it came two days after the Telugu version (12th Jan), and 14th Jan is always celebrated as Pongal. This and this may also be useful. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help, Kailash. I agree that Pongal is celebrated on 14 January. The main reason behind the "Sankranthi" season release is the poster you see there. I may delay in adding them, but i will surely add the information within a reasonable period of time. If you don't mind me asking, considering its cult status in both the languages, i hope you saw the film. Did you? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your future GA/FA plans
Good to see your plans may come soon. This looks like a great source worth using for Missamma; unfortunately, I don't know how to access it fully online (pay may be possible though). This can also help. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I remember Dumdledore saying to Harry Potter that help will be provided at Hogwarts always to those who deserve it. Google too, sadly, is providing something thinking that we just deserve that much. Whatever content i find, i shall use it. There is no deadline, and Wikipedia is never finished. So i amen't hasty. With the content Madras Studios provides, i am sure i can expand the article to a decent length. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Ugetsu
Finished seeing it just now. Such a great cinematic product! Can't get it out of my mind. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 05:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I am glad that you enjoyed it. The cinematography is the film's biggest asset. Perhaps, Dr. Blofeld's love for silence comes from this film. When the characters' perceptions change, it influences the viewers completely as well and that is something unique Ugetsu offers. Once you come to know about the supernatural elements i.e. the ghost of the wife etc., Ugetsu turns very very special. It is worth revisiting more than once, that is for sure. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeed yes. I've already understood it though, but yes, worth another watch for sure! It's sort of like The Sixth Sense in period Japan. Should have won the Golden Lion.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 05:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Worth a Golden Lion, indeed! But, not always awards define a film's worth. Its impact on the future generations do. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Tamannaah filmography
Any plans to revisit it? Looks like a potential FL. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * So much reworking has to be done in terms of sources and the lead section. I may pursue it in the latter half of the year. But, if you wish to make it a FL, you may go ahead. I have no issues with that :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No, I can't take the credit of your and Fygu's work involved in it. I guess i'll wait. :) Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * So, that means you are interested in doing so. Good to know that. Let's wait then. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I meant i'll wait for the latter half of the year. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, then i have to go for it alone. Its okay. Once my wikibreak is done, i will begin work on some articles. Once they all are done, i am sure the second half of the year shall come. Then i may choose to work on this. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Alone??? Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes. Alone! I wanted to collaborate with Fygu once for something similar. But he made it very clear that he was not actually interested in the concepts of GA/FL/FA. I will ask him again before proceeding. Based on the reply, on the day of creating the page, i will decide the nominators. Till then, i shall work on that list alone (if i intend to). Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You alone are more than enough for that list. Still i'll try to help. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * BTW. I'm glad you've decided to work on Siva. One of the gems by RGV who is effed up now. Even his auto-biography has a filthy title. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment ! But, this is too premature at the moment. Let's wait for sometime to take any decision. Regarding RGV, i read his first autobiography in Telugu i.e. Naa Ishtam (My wish). I haven't read Guns & Thighs and Bullets & Boobs yet, nor i am interested in doing so. Siva, Satya, Kshana Kshanam, Gaayam—These four films are the reasons why i still respect him as a filmmaker. Siva and Gaayam, in particular, are my all-time favourites. BTW, is Bipasha Basu filmography your next FL attempt? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:36, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Company is also a damn good film, even I used to admire him for his earlier work and his boldness on certain things. But he has made way too many crappy films and still continues to do so. Also the worst part! he's unapologetic about it. Anurag Kashyap here (at 1:35) has some opinion on him. Yeah, I'll co-nominate Basu's list with Vensatry (If he'll agree). Since he's the creator. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I haven't watched Company yet, i may do so soon. Rakta Charitra, The Attacks of 26/11, Killing Veerappan are the decent works of RGV in the recent past. But all of them are decent, because they are based on real life incidents which have so much strong potential. I cannot predict whether he can be the same RGV again, but i confidently say that even his crappiest films contain something novel, either in script or in technology. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Agree to some extent. I've seen the first Rakta Charitra and it was good. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:57, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * He has announced a sequel to Siva in last September. If it materialises, i can only hope that it should not end up another bland adaptation of The Godfather. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * He ruined Satya by making a unnecessary sequel. I believe such classic's shouldn't be touched. Yashthepunisher (talk) 03:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Unless backed by a very strong content, sequels and adaptations should never be attempted. Tanu Weds Manu Returns can be cited as a good example for this. RGV has adapted The Godfather at least three times till date. Siva was adapted by him in 2006 which was mediocre. Aag is just a sacrilege to Sholay. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * But he never really learns from his mistakes. Yes, there is too much of Godfatheresque films in Indian cinema. The best one I think is Naayakan. And yeah there are only handful of good remakes and sequels. BTW Ramu is leaving. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * He did that long ago when i was a toddler, only to return again and make mediocre films. I met him personally twice, and could actually understand that he has a strong urge to speak what he feels to do so. Sample this: I asked "Why are you making Rakta Charitra into two parts?" He said, "One says the rise, and another says the fall. Together as a single film may not be so convincing." Another contest winners said "I like you Siva and Satya a lot. Which is your favourite?", he said, "almost everything except you for thinking in such an idiotic way." Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * He has created umpteen enemies because of such behaviour. God save this atheist. Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Nayakan, yes, most definitely, but it was merely inspired by The Godfather. A more direct adaptation is this gem. Really close to the screenplay of The Godfather.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 07:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Regarding Ira Singhal Article
Do support the article, Ira singhal was the First physically challenged person to get 1 rank in civil services.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ira_Singhal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.123.63.6 (talk) 13:04, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Shocking NFA results
I still can't believe that Chopra didn't win for the 3rd time in last four years, mostly for top acts of the year. But this year's makes it more painful because Tanvi Azmi was the most undeserving actress to win. I mean she had only two good scenes; one brilliant with Chopra. Rest of her scenes were like a TV's mother-in-law, melodramatic is the only word to describe. On the other hand Chopra's performance was very layered and nuanced. Even a blind can see the difference. How they can award her over Chopra? Is just because Azmi sacrificed her hair for the part? No one will ever know. This year had the most shocking winners of the decade. It seems like the Jury was filled with blind people, who got drunk and decided the winners. Shame. Krish |  Talk  18:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I am not a fan of Priyanka Chopra, but i do respect her work. I agree that she gave a commendable performance in Bajirao Mastani and was far superior than Azmi and Padukone, who too did a fine job. IMHO, in the case of an actor, NFA is a bonus for his/her excellence and not a defining example of his/her acting prowess. I too was very disappointed when a great film like Manam did not win a NFA in any category and Chandamama Kathalu won the NFA for best Telugu film. Not that the latter was bad, but i really wished the former to win. Coming back, this time, i am shocked to see SLB winning the best director and Baahubali winning the best film. What actually shocked me is that, if Baahubali had the capacity to win the best film, why Rajamouli lost to Bhansali? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it is shocking that Baahubali (great but you know the reason) won Best Feature Film. Can you imagine? I thought Bajirao Mastani and Baahubali should have won Wholesome Entertainment Award, not the 10x over rated Bhaijaan. Though Bhansali deserve this award, Rajamouli deserved it too because both had vision for their respective films which significantly paid off. I don't know what prompted the dumb jury to choose this year's winners. Plus, I was shocked to hear Best Actor/Actress category. Though they are deserving, Bachchan didn't do anything groundbreaking in that role (as evident by trailers). Off course he is the star of the millennium, it doesn't mean you will go on to award him for any film. Meryl Streep won her 3rd after 20 something year but AB won 3 in last 10 years. Vikram in I and Ranveer in BM were spectacular. Coming to brilliant Ranaut (again most deserving) but hey a consecutive Best Actress that too in a year where you have Anushka in NH10, Richa in Masaan and Kalki in Margarita. I'm sure Deepika is as good in Piku. I felt like Im reading the Filmfare Awards winner. This year is the most shocking in a bad way. Krish |  Talk  03:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * IMHO, Vikram's performance was amazing in I. It is no mean task to live up to all the eccentric yet creative thoughts of Shankar. But, Pithamagan (he won NFA for this last time) is extremely challenging for any actor when compared to the difficulties I gives. Ranveer Singh was very good in Bajirao Mastani. Coming to Piku, NFA may look exaggerated. But, if we find the portrayal of Bhaskor Banerjee, a very critical and twisted old man always speaking about constipation and badmouthing many, easy on our eyes, it is because of Amitabh Bachchan. Yet, i amen't satisfied with the jury this time. I shall not comment on Ranaut and Bajrangi Bhaijaan. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, Ranaut will win for her two upcoming films as well. The first is Rangoon (2016) and Simran (2017), both films by amazing directors. I think she is the only one who can break Shabana Azmi's record (three consecutive Best Actress as well as 5 BA). By the time of retirement, Ranaut will have atleat 10 NFAs. Krish |  Talk  13:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * She is a good actress, and it is possible. Coming to Telugu cinema, i am happy that Kanche, the first WWII film in Telugu, has won the NFA this time. For 2016, i amen't sure. But Oopiri looks a good contender. BTW, in the wake of this discussion of awards, i want to ask you something. Do you think SRK will regain his lost glory with Fan and Raees at least at the Filmfare? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I think he will. Don't forget he was still nominated for Dilwale and even won 4-5 awards. So its obvious he will win awards next year. He will definitely win Best Actor at Filmfare for Fan. I don't see another actor who has this kind of role this year. Aamir, as usual, will be ignored no matter how great he will be in Dangal. Manoj Bhajpai will be ignored too or he might get fake Critics awards. I cant say anything for Raees, for that I need to see trailers. Coming back to Fan, It doesn't excite me much. That Jabra Fan song is annoying and so as his dancing. I was more excited after the teasers than the trailers, which feels like an amalgamation of Darr and Billu. Srk's voice modulation is commendable (if not digitally modified) in the fan role. You know what I think he can even have the chances of winning NFA because this years list is full of shockers, mostly commercial cinema. If comic acts swept both Actor/Actress category, he stands a chance of winning it next year. Who you think might win next year? Krish |  Talk  14:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * NFA is meant for actors across India. We even saw a relatively novice Kannada actor Sanchari Vijay winning it in 2015 (for 2014). Once DFF releases the entries, we can estimate. Till then, i have no hopes. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

I dont know who u are
pavan is not my enemy. I never come across your edits and my edits on same article Vakthruthva (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * We came across each other in Kanche. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Eega
Here are some of the references from The Hindu which I have stored. You can use these for further development too. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 04:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help, bro. But, it is sad that you haven't notified me before adding the content to the main article. It wasn't wrong, but the content was incomplete. Anyways, i appreciate your help on this. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I actually thought it was completed. My bad. Really sorry. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 08:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I said it's okay. All the best for the GARs of Anbe Sivam and Keechaka Vadham (rhyming as words but opposite in nature). BTW, would you like to be a co-nominator for Eega? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I think its best you go solo this time (like how Trueheartsusie3 did with Monroe). You can do it, man. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 08:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Haha you believe i can! That's so kind of you. I have no objections about that, but i believe that collaborations should happen at the moment. Respecting your views, Eega shall be my solo FAC. Let's collaborate some other time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't mind being listed as Eega's co-nominator for FAC; because I could take care of comments in your absence. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I shall be very happy. But, i want to be the co-nominator for Missamma. Is that okay for you? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Please do so. Meanwhile, you could add this to Eega. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks very informative. Off for today on Eega, shall continue from tomorrow. Gearing up for my first solo FAC, should be a success like your Chandralekha and Kalidas. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * In case you don't know, "Marakathamani" is an alias used by Keeravani. Here's the source. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Informative. But, where do you intend to use it in the article? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:20, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Actually, its written as "Maragathamani" or "Maragatha Mani". So its better to go with that name for the Tamil version. For Hindi songs, his pseudonym is "M. M. Kreem". You can use it as a footnote to denote the pseudonyms with appropriate citations. BTW, Pavan, do create a separate article for the awards and nominations section (its received 40 nominations by my count, higher than Enthiran). It must have also received awards from STAR Vijay, Mirchi Music Awards South and Chennai Times Film Awards. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 11:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I was planning to do that tomorrow. If properly planned, it may even become a FL. Coming to Maragathamani, once i begin working on the development section, i will add a footnote as you suggested. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Unlike what Ssven did for Enthiran, I think we can add information about any potential sequel to Eega, like how the Marvel Cinematic Universe articles have been doing (actually, every single released MCU film now has a sequel that has either released or is in development/production, except The Incredible Hulk, which's article still has a "Future" section.) If you don't want to add until the sequel has been confirmed, you could compile all the info and make it a hidden note. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:00, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Post NFA drama
Have you read |this, and ? OMG!! It looks like people are not really happy with NFA winners this year. Kangana's win was controversial from the moment it was announced. Plus this Deepika vs Kangana drama. You will be shocked that Padukone was in race for Bajirao Mastani (ROFL). Deepika is trying to get limelight for her snub and by planting stories that how she was overlooked for something as ridiculous as her performance in Bajirao Mastani. I have never read anything like this in last few years, that media never reported that he/she was snubbed for a film, its NFA afterall. But this time, the PR Queen that she is, is using her PR machinery. It is quite laughable. Wasn't Tabu snubbed for Haider, and Maqbool, Rani Mukerji snubbed for Black, Priyanka Chopra for Barfi!, Mary Kom and Bajirao Mastani, or Vidya Balan for Kahaani? But nobody said anything then, because these actresses didn't cry in public: "Hey Look I was snubbed, let's use the PR and get publicity"? I was kind of feeling bad that she lost to a not so NFA (but popular circus like Filmfare) performance by Ranaut. Now, I don't. By the way, I heard that Satish Kaushik and Ramesh Sippy were jury heads. I was sure something was wrong when I saw the winners list and after I know who the jury was, I pity the winners. Kaushik, really? They couldn't get a Rakhi Sawant to judge the films? Krish |  Talk  06:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * After reading your entire message and going through the external links you gave, i think Raja Sen could have "intelligently", "skillfully", "efficiently" and "honestly" provided the NFA if he was a part of the jury. :p You seem to follow NFAs well. So, you say who would be a good jury? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:11, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, the jury should consist of smart, intelligent and unbiased people. A group of actors should choose winners for acting categories, writers for writing, directors for direction and so on. But, those people should have a body of work, maybe Shekhar Kapoor, Vishal Bhardwaj, Gulzar, Mani Ratnam and not someone like Satish Kaushik, who has given some painful films like Tere Naam and an unremarkable rip-off of Juno. Even some critics should join them. Raja Sen, Pratim D. Gupta, Anupama Chopra, Rajeev Masand, Namrata Joshi and Shubhra Gupta are only critics whose opinion matters the most. They are ubiased and literally know their job. What do you think? Krish |  Talk  13:20, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If i know what to say, why would i ask? I would be happy with any critic being a part, except for Taran Adarsh and Mayank Shekhar. NFA has been blurring the line between mainstream and parallel cinema since the last five years. I must admit, not many are actually happy that Baahubali won the NFA. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Taran Adarsh, 2009 onwards, has become a dumb critic. He is making so much money by fooling readers by his tacky reviews. I think there should be a Critics Choice Awards in India. Atleast we won't see a Sonam Kapoor nominated for a Khoobsurat (film is good though) or Dumbo Ki Doli, SRK for all his films since MNIK, and all the non-deserving starkids. But the problem is, its hard to get sponsers, producers to produce such an award in India, where stars dance in frustration, cross dress as women, crack homosexual jokes all the time, and most importantly have same reaction for 10 different instances. Did I forget to mention the "recorded claps and whistles", which can make even the NFL audiences shy. But, whatever they can start as a small ceremony and it will definitely become big few years later. Even the great Mad Max didn't win the Oscar for Best Film, and the spectacular Star Wars: TFA wasn't even nominated. But, here is the opposite, Baahubali won the highest honour. Even Bajirao Mastani (these two were fighting the last rounf for this category too) would have been a bad choice for Best Feature Film. Baahubali should have won Wholesome Entertainment category over the tacky Bajrangi Bhaaijaan. It was much more popular (than BB), and still is. I think they got drunk during Masaan, which should have won the award. What do you need? It won several International awards. Plus, two award at Cannes Film Festival. But, I blame Kaushik and Sippy for favouring Bollywood's commercial hits over its critical gems, and sidelining the regional cinema. Krish |  Talk  15:24, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * You are right. I almost stopped watching award ceremonies; they have become very buffonery similar to some standup comedy shows or idiotic dance competitions. Not to forget those "costly" designer dressing which actually makes them look awkward. Masaan is a very good film. The way two heartbreaks conclude in the city of death, that was eerie. This year down south, two films gave something which i never expected. First, today i saw Nagarjuna playing the role of a paraplegic in Oopiri, an official adaptation of The Intouchables. For the first time perhaps, i have seen a south Indian adaptation which "adapts" the original's soul "perfectly". Heard that KJo has acquired its remake rights and i wonder whom he would cast? Can you predict any casting combination after watching its trailer here? Second, finally after these many years, Rajinikanth is going to play a character in Kabali that suits his real age with no punchlines. Strange, but most awaited. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, Oopiri does look like a faithful adaptation, going by the trailers, which is kind similar to the original film's trailer. Plus, it looks amazing. I haven't seen the original film so I really can't say anything about it. As per the KJO's adaptation, it will be more commercial. If I had to cast I would choose Irrfan Khan for the physically disabled, and Ranveer Singh as that fun-loving guy. Its an unusual choice but doesn't it look right? By the way, KJO will cast one of his students (Varun or Siddharth opposite Alia), which is a shame. Siddharth Malhotra ruined Kapoor & Sons, he didn't do justice to his role. I find Karan Johar very manipulative as a person/producer, who favours his favorites over true talent. Coming to Rajnikanth, I don't know what to say about him. I haven't seen many of his films. Robot, bits and pieces of Sivaji, Hum, Bulandi, Chaalbaaz that's it. I have heard so much about Sadma, which I will try to watch in my semester break. But, an actor's job is to play different roles and he should get rid of playing similar roles over and over again. There is nothing wrong to play an old man or look like your current self. Only Indian actors are obsessed with looking good, in every film, which is ridiculous. Bollywood is obsessed with this. When I saw SRK in that song "Gerua", I laughed so hard. I think Bollywood male actors raise a film budget because they use as much make as the actresses. Krish |  Talk  17:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Your comments on the actors' looks were right. Coming to The Intouchables, i've seen both the original and the remake. I was initially apprehensive when the makers added a back story to the caretaker. But that did help in maintaining the emotional graph well. Irrfan and Ranveer are good choices, because the film would require leads who look polar opposites and make an odd, weird pairing. But, i think KJo would cast his favourites SRK or Hrithik for the paraplegic (the latter already did a similar one in Guzarish) and Varun/Siddharth as the caretaker (the former is better compared to the latter). I wish he just produces it. If he directs it as well, i amen't sure whether it would become a good film. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:56, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

No matter what I do, but Krimuk is never going to talk. Instead he is calling me a fanboy for an edit regarding particular praise on Bajirao Mastani (which is a fact). On the other hand his own fancruft edits are visible on his actress articles. For Piku, Irrfan Khan received more praise (check every review) but according to Krimuk, Padukone and AB were only praised. So who is the FANBOY here? I'm not the one who is turning every Indian actress's article into a blog (Widespread success, Established actress, Queen of acting. Known for pioneering a change, known for breaking stereotypes, female hero, Box-office Queen...blah blah blah). I don't care what he does but such allegations are intolerable. Don't you think? Krish |  Talk  14:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If you can't win over someone with arguments, try consensus. If that too fails, work on something else unrelated with patience. Are Bajirao Mastani and Piku the only articles which require improvement? There are loads of good films which deserve some care. I don't know what you are up to in the case of Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak. Continue working on it, or something else. Stop digging the graves. Coming to my work, i am working on Eega and am trying to make it a FA. Fortunately, the progress till now is very smooth, thanks to timely help from and . Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

FLC for List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1960–69)
Hi! I have nominated the subject list for FL. Could you find some time out and give your comments here? I have read the note on top of your page. But still posting before I forget. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Good to know that. I may try, but i can't guarantee. Scrutiny is something i can't afford to give currently. All the best! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem. See if you can review it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Keechaka Vadham
At long last, it's now officially promoted to GA status. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 06:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Three cheers each. Let me know when you plan to nominate it for FAC. All the best for Anbe Sivam as well. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:55, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

The conclusion
Have you read this? I am so excited for it. He said "The fans of Baahubali will get answers to many questions like what happens between Shivagami and Baahubali? What happens between Shivagami and Kattapa? And what happens between Bhallala Deva and Devasena?". I can't wait more. Krish |  Talk  07:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I too wish to see what happens. Baahubali: The Beginning made a great impact i believe. This is one comic example of the film's fame i came across in the recent past. What say? BTW, who was he? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Who? I didn't get your last line. Are you talking about that crap person, who is a self-proclaimed critic? Krish |  Talk  08:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I know about RGV. I am referring to the other one. I remember seeing a similar face in Ek Villain. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:08, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey I know who RGV is. So you were asking about that crap person. Yes, he was in Ek Villain. He is the most sexist, hypocrite, and judgemental person you wouldn't like to know about. Krish |  Talk  08:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * His loose tongue may bring trouble to him from Pawan Kalyan's fans. Anyways, i am waiting for both Baahubali: The Conclusion and Rajinikanth's 2.0. Different genres at the same time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If that was the case he would have been in the jail. But nobody gives a damn about his remarks, although his remarks are often insulting. He would comment on actor's personal lives, Sonakshi Sinha's weight, actors who are struggling calling them "flop actors", refers ageing actresses as "aunties" and so on. You name it, and every sexist/racist comment, you'll find it on his timeline. Its a shame that some dumb Indians follow him (1 million followers). He is a moron, who should have been sentenced to jail for his entire life. Anyways, don't pay attention to those kind of dumb people. Coming to Baahubali 2 and 2.0 clash, Its unfortunate that both big films will open on same day but Baahubali,hands down, will win the battle. Even though 2.0 stars Rajnikanth and Akshay Kumar, it will suffer because of Baahubali's craze. I bet The conclusion will break every existing record. It's hindi version alone will do over 30-40-50 crore business on day 1. It should easily collect over 100 crore (all languages) on its openindg day. Lets hope the clash will be averted. Krish |  Talk  09:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Most likely, it will be averted (2.0) as it has just started its principal photography while The Conclusion is 3/5th completed. Post-production works will most definitely/likely postpone the planned release of 2.0 as it did with Enthiran.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 10:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I saw The Beginning for the 15th/16th time today, believe me, the ending again gave me goosebumps. It's a classic which doesn't get older. These iconic characters will have huge influence in the near future, just like Star Wars, Harry Potter and LOTR. I wish he directs a Mahabharat trilogy some day, he is the only one (another is SLB but he makes romance films) who can do it. My god I need to see all of his films ASAP. He is a genius. Krish  |  Talk  12:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't watch every film of his. They aren't the type you expect them to be. Watch these three—Magadheera, Maryada Ramanna, and Eega. And yes, watch them in this order only. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I definitely will. Krish |  Talk  12:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Eega
Planning it directly for FA or will first take it to GA? And, the film's plot looks very fascinating. ツ FrB.TG (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Directly to FA. If at all it fails there, then i shall make it a GA before re-nominating at the FAC. Coming to the thought, IMHO Eega is indeed inventive and insane. I mean, though you can dismiss a simple housefly, just imagine the torture when it seeks revenge and makes you restless and all you can do is just suffer. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:04, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Pavan, by attempting a straight FA, you seem to be in risk of breaking your streak. But if it is for a first time experience, it is worth the risk. Many may question the use of Idlebrain.com as a source (I don't t though) but you could try convincing them of its reliability as you did during Mayabazar FAC. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere—these words by Albert Einstein inspired me to work on Eega and nominate it straightaway for FAC. I don't even bother if it affects my streak; they are made to be broken. Coming to Idlebrain.com, i know pretty well that it can be challenged. That was why i tried not to use it anywhere else in Eega. First i had a few links of Idlebrain.com, which were replaced by Sify, TOI, and The Hindu. It wasn't used in Mayabazar either. But yes, i and Krimuk90 used it in the FLs—List of accolades received by Dookudu and Tabu filmography. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * That's my boy! I really love your courage. Anyway, when it is at FAC give me a ping so that I can engage in its review (I seriously love its concept; need to watch it ASAP). ツ FrB.TG (talk) 06:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I think this source states that an actor named Chandra Sekhar appeared in Rajamouli's Chatrapthi. An actor of the same name is also credited in Eega, without the name "Chatrapthi". So I assume that "Chatrapthi Sekhar" is actually Chandra Sekhar. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Shall invite you for sure. Do watch the film and let me know about your experience; Just one word -- "brilliant"! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Pavan, before nominating it for FAC, I do think its better to open up a peer review so that if there are any concerns/comments posed/posted by fellow editors, the majority of it can be resolved there. Your call.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 14:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Once the GOCE completes the c/e, i will begin a peer review. I don't want the fly to be insanely screwed at the "featured" graveyard. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * At the 7th Vijay Awards, Naan Ee received numerous nominations, but only two wins. There are news sources for the winners, but only the videos for the nominees. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:09, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Can Dailymotion be considered reliable? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know (until the user is an official and verified one), but you can do like you did for "59th Idea Filmfare Awards South 2012" at Dookudu awards's FL. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Samantha Ruth Prabhu
Is she the most popular south Indian actress? I'm asking because she is the lead actress of most of the popular south Indian films. Is she? If not who is? Krish |  Talk  18:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * An out-of-the-blue and somewhat strange question. Anyways, i will try to answer this. Samantha is a well known actress in South Indian cinema (read Telugu and Tamil). She is "one of the most" popular actresses down south. Others include Anushka Shetty, Trisha, Nayantara, Shriya Saran, Kajal Aggarwal, and Tamannaah to name a few. She has been part of a few good films as well as some awful films here. Well, how you came across this person? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I had seen her in a film called Brindavan (hindi dubbed; don't know its original name) with Kajal Aggarwal wayback in 2013-14 (can't remember exactly) on TV. She is the lead of Eega, which is quite popular film. Right? I had somewhere read that she won two Best Actress Filmfare in the same year for to different languages. So I thought she is the most popular or so. Haven't seen any of Nayantara's or Trisha's films. I came to know about Trisha, Kajal Aggarwal and Tamannah because of their hindi debuts. Only seen bits and pieces of hindi Singham. In the same way, had heard of Anushka wayback in 2010 or something, but only saw her in Baahubali. I have seen Shriya's Drishyam, Aawarapan, bits and pieces of Sivaji and a south Indian hindi dubbed in which she played the sister of a don, hindi actress Anjana Sukhani was also there. So I asked that question in curiosity. Krish |  Talk  07:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Samantha and Kajal's film was Brindavanam, a 2010 Telugu film (improper film, but the house set was really awesome). Shriya's film was Don Seenu (2010). What you heard was right, Samantha is the only actress after Revathi to win the Filmfare award for best actress in South for both Telugu and Tamil at the same time, in the same year. She won the Telugu one for Eega and the Tamil one for Neethaane En Ponvasantham. While i agree that she is a good actress, these awards (IMHO) are the result of the visions of the directors S. S. Rajamouli and Gautham Menon. As i suggested earlier, only three films of Rajamouli are needed to be seen—Magadheera, Maryada Ramanna, and Eega—in the same order before revisting Baahubali, to understand the cinematic genius in him. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

FAN and the biased reviews
Have you seen the film yet? Believe me the film is just opposite of what the reviews are saying. I think YRF/SRK have definitely paid the publications and even some of the reputed reviewers. I can't believe Raja Sen gave it a 4.5 stars. Like.....Seriously? Though not a bad film, its definitely not a brilliant film either. First of all reviewers are calling is as "cinematic achievement"? Did they saw the wrong film (TJB), I'm sure they mistook Share Khan as SRK in prosthetics. These people have double standards when it comes to reviewing films, they don't judge films on their merit but stars, directors and obviously if they have been paid better. They would say for other films that "filled with loopholes 2 stars" but here "filled with loopholes 3.5 stars", "one man show 4 stars". God save Bollywood. In my opinion the film was okay. It started very well actually, then became silly afterwards. The second half was as dumb as Rohit Shetty's car explosions and it became more and more dumb towards the climax. However, I would agree SRK is really good in this film, one might say this is his best performance ever, he was good as the FAN but outstanding as the STAR. Only annoying thing was his voice modulation/accent (don't know how Boys from Delhi speak). RIP Indian reviewers. Krish |  Talk  19:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I am sure I am not wanted here, but just because you don't like one particular film, does not mean you accuse its cast or crew of paying reviewers. I am not a Khan fan, but the film has prompted positive reaction from the audience, too. Surely he did not pay the audience, and I see that 6K IMDb users disagree with Krish!. FrB.TG (talk) 21:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Those 6K SRK devotees made Bajirao Mastani IMDB score 2.5 on its release date just because it clashed with Dumbwaale. Those idiots wanted BM to bomb, which is so dumb thing to do. Rate a film low just because it clashed with your favorite star's film and is going to eat its share of pie at BO? Talk about disagreement. I said the above things because the film only works when you don't care about LOGIC, which off course prompts reviewers to trash some other decent films. But "hey, this is SRK and this film came after superbad films like CE, HNY, and Dilwale, he is back in form after three duds, refreshing?" And, I don't think IMDB has anything to do with a film's quality. Only in your world, Fan (8.9) can be better than a Lootera (7.4) and The Lunchbox (7.8). Krish |  Talk  02:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I will comment on Fan and the reviewers opinions only after watching it. And, i believe that Lootera and The Lunchbox are basically art house films which will receive critical acclaim and praise from a selected section of the audience who prefer to watch "mature" films instead of the mainstream cinema. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, I saw the film yesterday and I would say, it is one of his best since Chak De. To make a film like this with an A-list actor is no mean feat. SRK should be appreciated for taking up a brave move like this. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 01:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay guys, after a long and tiring Saturday, i've watched Fan yesterday night. The second half loses steam. There were few loopholes (like how Gaurav's face wasn't recognised at the wedding on the staircase, Aryan leaving London despite having a FIR filed on him etc.) Still, it is not a small thing to portray a star's inner fragile side as well as an obsessive fan with such an ease. Fan is indeed SRK's best since the last 5-6 years, and i disagree with Krish! that the climax was dumb. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:04, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Just when everyone thinks Mr Khan has lost his charm, he bounces back. FrB.TG (talk) 06:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I said "the film started well but is dumb in the second half", and I did said it might be SRK's best performance of all time. I never criticised SRK. I like his films very much, I had seen Chak De over 50 times in 2007-08. If you see my post above, it concerned more about Indian reviewers. For example, if it had starred another less famous actor, the critics would have given much less ratings, that's it. And, I still feel the film is as dumb as Rohit Shetty's car explosions. Would yo like to explain if SRK will do the same in real life, rum after the creepy fan to stop him? He had a fortune of $600 million, right? He will never run to stop a crazy fan. In the film, he is so helpless that he had to do everything on his own. His team had the videos of him and his fan at two different places but nobody ever thought to release it in press? He was bashed everywhere, lost deals, empty stadiums and all still no one cared to release it? Even Rakhi Sawant is more intelligent than the Aryan Khanna, Don't you think? It it were a fantasy film, it would have been fine to me. Krish  |  Talk  07:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I respect your views for sure. Coming to Fan, i view it as a satire on the beliefs and ideologies of a "star" and a "fan". I think the director and writer wanted to touch the inner dark side of every superstar who comes out with a broad smile that may not be original always. And about the videos, what can they prove? People at Madame Tussauds (who saw that live) and the London police (who saw a recording) were sure that Aryan was the culprit. Isn't there a chance that people may assume the release of the videos by Aryan's team an act of damage control by blaming someone else? What if Gaurav comes out, claims himself as Aryan's fan, and say that Aryan has framed him using their similarities? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:01, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know but people in the theatre (a multiplex, filled with College students) were hooting like small screens. People were cheering for the FAN more. For most people it came across that the fan is creepy yet adorable. And, the superstar a "bastard". Come on we all know how the human nature is, not only superstars, everyone behaves that way. What the fan does in the movie to show his admiration was very wrong but to most people it looked like he did the right thing but the star never acknowledged that. You know what I mean. In my view, the star was right and the fan, every bit wrong. What did you think about this? Krish |  Talk  08:30, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * IMHO both are flawed human beings who just want to live in a life that is theirs. Gaurav's life was his love for Aryan. When that was rejected, nothing else was left in his life to divert attention onto. Aryan wanted a life that was his, and not at the cost of anyone else's. His reaction on Sid Kapoor's attack, cutting Gaurav's phone at the empty auditorium, and his conversation in the climax are the sequences which made me think so. Gaurav began his attack as he was left with no choice. Aryan too began his attack only when he was left with no choice. At the end, both are the same—physically injured, mentally exhausted, and stubborn. Here, i find the star actually the hero; it is not easy to forgive the fan and trying to make peace. What i loved actually in Fan is that it narrates the story of characters, not a hero and a villain. That's all from me. BTW, since you've asked these many questions, i wish to ask one. Do you really find my opinions worthy to know? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Off course. That's why i ask you so many things. Krish |  Talk  12:52, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Mayabazar (Telugu,1995)
Something went wrong in editing Mayabazar. Dasari Narayana Rao remade the film in 1995. [m.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/madhavapeddi-suresh-recalls-the-ups-and-downs-of-his-25year-career-in-music/article8252938.ece]PhysicsScientist (talk) 12:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Mayabazar
2002 film Lahiri Lahiri Lahirilo whose title was named after the song of the same name from Mayabazar is missing in Legacy section.PhysicsScientist (talk) 14:13, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you please provide a reliable source confirming the same? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * No. I did not find any. Did not you know the film?PhysicsScientist (talk) 15:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

[ http://wirally.com/legend-mayabazar-amazing-facts/]PhysicsScientist (talk) 07:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking some time out to provided these sources. But, both may not be eligible for a FA-class article. The latter source has plagiarised content from us. The former, though informative, may not qualify WP:RS. Sorry! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Siva
...or is that the spelling of the film? I found an English poster, albeit a cropped one, that spells "Shiva". The film's IMDb page and the documentary also use the same spelling. Or perhaps you could add a note to the article reading, "also spelt [name]". Meanwhile, for Eega, you could use this. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * That English poster belongs to the Hindi version (the face in the logos are different). When i rewrite the lead, i shall add a note that it is also spelt as Shiva. I will add India Today source to Eega tonight. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ugh, I hate contradictions! Page 211 of this book reads, "While one school claims that Ram Gopal Varma's 1989 gangster thriller Shiva was the first Indian film to make extensive use of the Steadicam, others trace it to an earlier source in 1984. See Bombay (London: British Film Institute, 2005), 51-54". What do we do?! At least the book could have mentioned the potential films, don't you think so? Kailash29792 (talk) 06:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If the source is incomplete, just ignore it. The author of the source we used is Varma himself, and form all i have read, he is serious about this film most of the times. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * When using YouTube as a source, please make sure that you use videos from verified channels (i. e., with a tick next to the channel name). Some video sources in Siva don't look like they come from verified channels. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I checked the sources again, and came to know that Aditya Movies — Telugu & Hindi isn't verified (it didn't have a tick). But, from the channel's description, and the official twitter/Facebook accounts of Aditya Music, i came to know that this channel belongs to them. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Queen vs Krrish
What do you really think about this controversy. Though I respect and admire Hrithik, I believe Kangana Ranaut is telling the truth. Come on, nobody is a fool who will claim a fantasy. She is one hell of a strong woman, whom I have respected since her debut. But, the way she has put her struggling years in public in last two years, I have a newfound respect for her as a Human Being. I don't know if she is going to prove him wrong or not but that is definitely not going to affect her career, which I'm most happy about. I hope everything will be sort out soon. Krish |  Talk  13:57, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * For me, this entire controversy is a huge bag of shit, a huge pile of crap, and a tonne-heavy load of forages for the horses of Indian media. This controversy sounds immature and childish from the word go. Their peers Shahid Kapoor, Kareena Kapoor, Aishwarya Rai, and many others have handled their breakups very well. Wish they learn from them. Having said all, i do respect both as talented actors. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah! That's true. If Hrithik wasn't really ready to accept it, why did he sent her a court notice? She said "Silly ex", he would have let it be. I mean its absolutely ridiculous from his side. Now, he has released some emails (fake or true; i don't know)and its the most immature thing to do. He is trying to portray her as a "Psycho stalker". Who know if he had sent some mails and those were her replies to him. He might have deleted his mails and released hers. But the one thing is clear Kangana Ranaut haters (mostly Deepika Padukone's fans) are enjoying big time and not to forget the dumb Indian media, who are earning so much by selling this childish story. I don't respect Indian media, they are like leeches, and one who can even sell their souls to get more hits. Krish |  Talk  16:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * There is a line uttered by Albus Dumbledore in the final installment of the Harry Potter series. "Don't pity the dead, Harry. Pity the living who don't live with love". In this situation, i wish to change it to this: "Don't pity the dead, my friend. Pity the living who aren't sensible". I really feel that this issue is being blown out of proportion, and will keep these two in news until Mohenjodaro and Rangoon release. Till then, i would like to enjoy watching good, content-based Telugu films like Kshanam and Oopiri. Hope you too enjoy watching some good films in Hindi or English or any other language. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I wish I could say the same thing. This year, i have lots of things to do. I will be giving the highest priority to my studies. I'm in my final year of college which means the projects, the seminars, the conferences, and the most important part, the placements. I will be on a long wikibreak after this month and will only come back in December or maybe January next year, it might take a whole year. Since the last semester is the most important one because of the major project and the fact that i will miss my college life and friends. So it can take time, i might come back next May or June, not clear about it. But will try to visit once in a month if possible. Krish |  Talk  17:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * So you,, and are on the same line. All the best to all of you. This year, for me, is not as busy and event based as yours. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:54, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Would you please put your thought here, as this moron Dharmadhyaksha has started an edit war on Kashibai. AS we see articles on wikipedia, we just list that he or she has been potrayed by this person in this film and has won award or so. But this dumb moron had added that her clothes and dance was criticised. Like Chopra designed her own clothes and she was the one who said to add that dance. First of all its the film's article subject to elaborate criticism, don't you think? Krish |  Talk  07:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Would you please talkback back at the discussion page, I'm lossing all the energy. I have my exams next week onwards and I'm having a discussion which is as clear as water but some dont want to see it. Please help.

Happy Birthday

 * Thanks for the wishes. That was quite heart touching. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Happy birthday. FrB.TG (talk) 19:54, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Happy birthday, Pavan! JAG  UAR   21:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the wishes, guys! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 00:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Mayabazar
Was quite surprised to see the names of ANR/GG listed under 'Supporting cast'. I thought Abhimanyu was the hero. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 08:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Happy b'day too. :) &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 08:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the wishes . Coming to Mayabazar, the "Principal cast" list is actually a listing of those actors/actresses who are a part of both the versions. The "supporting cast" list is a listing of those actors/actresses who are part of just one version, say ANR for Telugu and GG for Tamil as Abhimanyu. If you can rephrase the list's headings, or combine them into one appropriately, that shall be very helpful. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I have vague memories of the movie (Tamil version). You say, 'It revolves around the roles of Krishna (N. T. Rama Rao) and Ghatotkacha (S. V. Ranga Rao)', which implies that Krishna and Ghatotkacha are the principal characters of the film (folklore). So that clearly makes Abhimanyu and Sasirekha as supporting characters. Also, what exactly was Karna's role? &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 08:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Karna, Dushasana, and Shakuni are with Duryodhana most of the times. I guess only Shakuni had some separate screen time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Why Bollywood keep shaming the actresses, and treat actors like good virgin princes?
You know i have always been against slut shaming, body shaming and these kind of stuffs. And, Bollywood has a long history of shaming actresses and It really makes me angry. The so called male stars like Hrithik, Shah Rukh, Salman to name a few, are so hypocrites and just because they are biggest stars they get labelled as King, Bhaijaan and Greek god. On the other hand, actresses are treated as Sluts and a bitch. No matter what the male actors do but they will be labelled as a good son, husband and father. Even if they cheat on their wives, they and their PR put every blame on the actresses and audience label them as home breakers, whores and they forget about their talent and hard work. Why no one in Bollywood has power to say "Karan Johar is the only person SRK has been faithful to" like what the host at Golden Globes said about Ben Affleck? Just because their image will be tarnished? and they never accept their own fault, no matter if the actresess had to destroy their own career. It is so sad In Bollywood (and India) men are still seen as a stud (even if they cheat) and women as sluts (even when they dont). Now the whole bollywood is against Kangana and nobody is blaming Hrithik. Krish |  Talk  13:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Humans are grey-shaded, whether it is a male or a female. Even you, me, or anyone else will have some negativity in us. I agree that the problems Kangana and others are facing is truly unfortunate, but being judgmental in such issues is not going to help anyone. Whatever is happening is a huge drama, which i consider a completely childish and immature one. What was supposed to be private has become public, which is quite terrible. This issue may bother you, but none cannot lead a life without negativity and hypocrisy at least in one stage, no matter what he/she is actually. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Eega copyedit

 * That was quite quick. Thanks for the c/e! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * When things are going well, I chug along at about 2,000 words a day :-). Glad to help and all the best,  Mini  apolis  00:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Reliable sources
How to know what reliable sources are?PhysicsScientist (talk) 05:05, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * They should qualify WP:RS. Some examples of reliable sources are newspapers like TOI, The Hindu, Deccan Chronicle, DNA India etc. and websites like Sify and Rediff. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:57, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Are Greatandhra and Gulte reliable sources?PhysicsScientist (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * No. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:00, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you.PhysicsScientist (talk) 11:14, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. yPavanjandhyala (talk) 11:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Behindwoods too, but stick to GA levels with it for the time being. You can use it for FA if it covers production aspects like in Enthiran's case. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 04:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you.PhysicsScientist (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * References for Missamma and Mayabazar, add if they are reliable.PhysicsScientist (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking time out to provide sources. Sadly, the source's reliability is disputed at the moment and is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:33, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If it were on Sify like Siva (1989), then it could be a potential source. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 09:47, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Mayabazar is on Sify.PhysicsScientist (talk) 10:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You did not add the first reference.PhysicsScientist (talk) 11:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Because the same statement is already there in the article, but with a different source. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

FLC
Hey! I would like to tell you that my exams were postponed by few weeks so i have nominated Bajirao Mastani for FLC. I hope to receive constructive comments like always It is here. Thanks. Krish |  Talk  07:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Shall look into it soon. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:57, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

FAC
Hey Pavan! I just nominated Kalki Koechlin's article for FAC. I would appreciate your comments. Thank you! Numerounovedant  Talk  13:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Shall look into it soon. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you!  Numerounovedant   Talk  16:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

The Fly
I've seen the film and it is very good. You could add it to your "to-watch list". In Eega, it was mentioned that the scientist from The Fly turns into a fly after his experiment fails (though I changed this to "malfunctions"). Actually in the film, his invention is a set of telepods (a transmitter and a receiver). When he is teleporting from the transmitter to the receiver, a fly too joins him, confusing his computer into merging him with the fly at the molecular-genetic level. Now how exactly is the experiment a failure? Kailash29792 (talk) 10:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Quite strange concept The Fly has. Will watch it soon. Having said that, i find Eega more horrifying (unintentionally). Now, the question to your answer is: Yes, the experiment is a failure. The end result, even though not influenced by the human conducting an experiment, may fail due to external factors and the loopholes in the equipments used. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

24 (2016 film) plot
Hi Pavanjandhyala, re: your edit summary here, I previously removed the plot section because it was obviously copied from Filmibeat. The removal had nothing to do with the concept of spoilers. Just thought you might want to know. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for leaving the message. The mention of WP:SPOILER was not intended as a response to your edit; there are few fans who feel that giving away spoilers at this stage is bad and remove the plot summary fully/partially. That made me mention it. 24 has a confusing plot, i feel a minor c/e from anyone can help. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for writing the plot on the page. Not being native to India, I was waiting to see the film and then write it. Yes, the plot is confusing but it is what makes the film—a test to audience understanding. You have written it very well. And yes, I appreciate suggestions by you and on the poster image that stays on the same page. Couldn't reply that day on the talk page :) Arjann (talk) 06:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks . Do watch 24 when you are free. Surely recommended for Suriya's performance as Athreya and Sethuraman, cinematography, and the concept. Rahman's score was very good compared to the songs. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Siva
I got some info about the film from RGV's latest book. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bringing this book into usage in the article. But, is Siva the only reason which made you refer RGV's autobiography? Or something else? I'm curious to know. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * At first that was the only reason. I also found some pages in the book talking about Roja and decided to capture them too. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Will go for the nomination after adding info from the documentary as well. Now on, Siva is a collaboration between all of us three, no matter what you feel. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I strongly believe Siva is FAC worthy because it is well detailed, has adequate number of sources and no source-reliability issues. Though you have great reasons not to nominate it anytime soon (given that it is currently at GAN and you have Eega FAC to take care of soon), this was just a suggestion by me. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The lack of proper critical reception for both the film and its soundtrack are a strong deterrent. Few contemporary books may help, but i also require a few from its release times. Thus, i don't think so that Siva can actually become a FA anytime soon. Anyways, i am happy with a GA at the moment, and may find something noteworthy later. For now, i will start Eega FAC once Siva GAR completes. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I do believe you search for online Telugu sources right? They could help expand the article further. As for reviews, you could simply find comments on the film made by major newspapers/websites and directors, even if they are not full-fledged reviews. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You will receive a detailed mail from me in a few minutes about the making of Siva's GAN. I'm sure it will answer your questions, including this and others if any. Reply there itself. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:20, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siva (1989 Telugu film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siva (1989 Telugu film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 10:40, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * FYI, I've resolved most of the comments at GAR, save for one regarding the "Casting" section.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 13:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks . Will start the trimming process tomorrow. For now, a tag is on the article to avoid issues while doing so. Cheers! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

The News Minute
I have created an article on it as it is quite a reliable source to use. At the moment it is nominated by User:RA0808 for deletion due to lack of content. Do help me in finding out references and adding more info about the paper. Thanks. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 05:10, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you!
I started trying to help out with the Wales editathon and when I found some sources, just kept typing! :-) Thanks again! We hope (talk) 15:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Peer review/Eega/archive1
Hi. Have replied here inline. Sorry for the delay. Cowlibob (talk) 16:33, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Seems useful. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siva (1989 Telugu film)
The article Siva (1989 Telugu film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siva (1989 Telugu film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 17:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Pavan! If you're not too busy, would you mind visiting an FLC? FrB.TG (talk) 21:31, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Nice work. I have added a few comments there. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Nyayam Meere Cheppali
Can you check and tell me if there are vernacular sources confirming Rajinikanth's presence in the film? &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 08:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Nothing from newspapers and other websites. However, the film is uploaded by Indian Video Guru (verified) in YouTube, and may be of some help. His character is Aatma Ram, a police inspector. Apart from the full film link here, this poster also confirms his inclusion. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Nothing from newspaper search for a 1985 film? Looks weird. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 08:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * A supporting role, that too has less footage. Not sure someone would know about it. Suman said that Rajinikanth made an extended cameo appearance in Nyayam Meere Cheppali, but that was on a TV show. Within the limitations, i guess the above YouTube link is the best choice. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * His character name isn't mentioned in Naman Ramachandran's book, which is why I asked you for other sources. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 08:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * That's why i gave you the video link. Try to observe the clip from 1:11:40 to 1:13:55. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm unsure over the reliability of the publisher. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 09:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The publisher is a verified one; it surely is eligible. Besides, there is practically no other source which helps us in a similar way. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Tamannaah filmography
Hello Pavanjandhyala:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Tamannaah filmography has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Congratulations on the fact that all of your citations are archived. Yours is the first request I have edited where this is the case. It's too bad that so many contributors won't spend the time archiving to insure their articles don't develop dead links!

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the c/e. It is helpful. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Eega Sify
There are two sources by Telugucinema.om at the moment


 * 1
 * 2

Shouldn't be much of a problem to find alternative sources for them. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 02:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but you gave the same link twice. Guess a typo error or something. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:04, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

User:Langarhouse
Looks like another sock of Padmalakshmisx, despite having made only six edits on Wiki (as of 4:00pm IST ). Though I know you are already committed to the FAC of Eega, you wouldn't let our old enemy further ruin articles in the name of "improving" them, would you? If possible, you could collect more evidence of his sockpuppetry and then either of us will file the SPI. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu
Info from Ashish Rajadhyaksha, Paul Willemen. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 06:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks bro! Off to WP:GOCER now. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Rajinikanth filmography
The list is nominated by Kailash29792 and Vensatry at FLC. Feel free to leave comments there, buddy. Thank you. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 04:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I should thank you for being very friendly with everyone here, a rare virtue i find these days in Wikipedia. Not in terms of age, but your attitude does remind me of Prakash Raj from SVSC. Well, i may be out of town tomorrow and shall visit the FLC pae once i am back to Hyderabad. Hope that is fine! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Dhanyavadalu, thammudu.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 13:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

BH
Hey Pavan hope you doing well. I would like you to consider the discussions here and here and help me figure out a way to reach a consensus as most Bollywood articles fall in the scope. Could you possibly help me contact the publishers? Numerounovedant  Talk  16:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Congratulations! And yes, you're welcome. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Numerals and Currencies
Dear, greetings. I came to notice that this edit bears an edit summary quoting from MOS:COMMONALITY preferring millions over crores. Whereas the WP:MOSIN suggests the use of Indian numbering system for India-related articles, but providing respective millions/billions within parenthesis. The same has also been indirectly echoed in WP:NUMERALS, i assume. Also except for the tech-savvy and highly educated, million/billions may not be understood precisely as much as lakhs/crores, because most Indians and on the whole of South Asians are not much well versed in understanding Western numbering system. Hence i suggest the usage of lakhs/crores be continued for India-related articles. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 00:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice, and yes it sounds genuine. But, i am not entirely supportive of the usage of crores and lakhs. Wikipedia is educational and i think the South Asians are surely ain't ignorant of millions and billions. Considering the impact of globalisation on both the prince and the pauper, i am sure that the Western numbering makes sense. Another issue with the film articles is the US box office numbers. People will miss the "1 million and 2 million" clubs if they ignore the Western numbering. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:41, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Encyclopedia of Indian Cinema
This link for Rajadhyaksha & Williemen's book was found by Kailash29792. You can use it for possible future GANs. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 16:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Broken streak
While your GAN streak still continues strong, your overall success streak is (sadly) broken with Eega FAC being archived. Not in the way I expected it to be broken though, and I am sorry for the tragedy that caused the FAC withdrawal. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * You are thinking about my success streak, and that's appreciable. But, i am trying to nurse my broken heart and am unable to bear this. What would you call this when you have just bounced back from September 2015 and are fatally affected in June 2016. Really intolerable! Let's think about something else productive at the moment. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Eega

 * Thanks. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Gentleman (2016 film)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Missamma and Pathala Bhairavi by Pillai
Here they are. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help. I will be making changes only after the GOCE completes the c/e, as they reject requests with major and rapid developments (lacking stability is what they call it as, and i am not against that). Lets see, whether PB too has the potential to do better in the future. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Revert
Sorry I didn't mean to revert you! It was a mis-click on my watchlist. I hate it when that happens... JAG UAR   10:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Its okay. Its understandable. I hope you are back with GAs and their reviews post Cary Grant, aren't you? :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't intend to create a new section for this small message, but I think this can be used in Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks . But i don't have any idea how to include this in the article. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I haven't felt like reviewing lately, which is sad because I've just started a backlog elimination drive at GAN. But maybe I will start reviewing again when I feel like it. I saw your grieving template and just wanted to make sure that you're OK... JAG  UAR   17:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I am trying to be OK . When you started a backlog elimination drive, don't you conduct GA reviews? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If a "themes" section is created, it could fit there. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Not much scholarly analysis is available about the film, . I shall save this link for the time being. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I conducted three reviews last night, hopefully more to come once I get some free time! JAG  UAR   13:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * All the best, my friend. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Maheshinte Prathikaram
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maheshinte_Prathikaaram&diff=732793836&oldid=732777152 It seems there is a visible copyvio and conflict of interests.

Edit summaries: "tried as i could re-purposing direct copy-paste content. In the theme section the left wing inclination is disregarded by the director, so how it fits is also a question plus for me the link show manoramaonline, though its correctly given in edit section." - cites WP:COPYVIO and "A quick search about Esquire on the article http://www.rediff.com/movies/column/seeing-red-at-the-movies/20160601.htm doesn't mention it." - Later added, could be WP:SYNTHESIS. Hope these issues would be solved in the second review.
 * An IP editor has made those edits and its nominator Charles Turing has reverted them. Revert citing the policies is enough. Reassessment of a GA, what you call a second review, is not really required for such cases. Hope that helps. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:28, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Review
It's so great to see that you are back to editing. Sometimes doing other things make you busy and take your mind off your sorrow (I hope that is the case here). I have another list up for FL, Featured list candidates/Quentin Tarantino filmography/archive1. Take a look if you are not too busy expanding yet another article. FrB.TG (talk) 06:46, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I never stopped editing, i was only lying low. Things haven't changed much, but i just wanted to do something to keep myself busy, as you pointed out. The Intouchables is a fantastic film and its well-made remake Oopiri was equally inspiring. It had life in it. I am just trying to give it something here. Well, i shall do the review soon as i am free today. Cheers! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Just of curiosity. You never capitalize "I" (when referring to self). Is that intentional? FrB.TG (talk) 13:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Peer review/Andha Naal/archive1
Kailash29792 has aimed to make it an FA. Feel free to leave comments and do let me or him know if you intend to do so by pinging either of us. Thanks. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 00:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Indents
Hi -- I've fixed a couple of indent issues on the Eega PR, and I thought I'd drop you a note to explain. This is something a lot of editors get wrong! When you're commenting in an indented thread, the rule is: "duplicate whatever indent was used last, and add a colon or asterisk". Colons create a simple indent; asterisks create a bullet. So if the comment you're responding to starts with "*::", you'd reply with "*:::" to indent, and "*::*" to add a bullet. If you don't do this, MediaWiki gets confused and you can end up with some very odd-looking results -- see here for an example; there's a response in the middle with wrong indenting, and the result is a string of bullets. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Missamma copyedit

 * Thanks for the c/e and the condolences. Hoping for the best possible. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Film/Golden Hollywood Contest
Doc's just started up this contest about topics and articles covering Classical Hollywood cinema. It really will be worth your while. Do express if you are interested or not by signing up under the "Editors Interested" section. Thanks. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 15:30, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu
The article Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:01, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu
The article Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:21, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Bollywood
I don't know if you care or not, but I have been recommended some Bollywood films by fellow editors. I watched Airlift, Neerja and Drishyam (you authored the last of these - the original, Malayalam version, I think). All of them were brilliant - I hope the first two do get recognized at award shows - but I liked the last one in particular. I can't believe that craps like Dilwale was nominated over this nail-biting thriller. All actors, Ajay Devgan, Shriya Saran and Tabu in particular, were simply amazing. Have you watched any of these? FrB.TG (talk) 19:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no issues discussing about films. I saw Neerja and Drishyam, and am waiting to watch Airlift. I worked on the Telugu remake (i made my 10,000th edit on it as well). I saw all its notable remakes, and am impressed with every version (though the Kannada version isn't that subtle; the director is to be blamed). Apart from Neerja, all the 2016 Hindi films i saw (counts on fingers) are terrible. Fan was an exception though; i loved the meta-portions and the climax for its honesty. But, i could not enjoy the thriller portions; they were too preposterous. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Great! How's the work with Eega going? FrB.TG (talk) 16:44, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * FAC starts on 1 September. Shall be happy if you visit it. BTW, congratulations on Emma Stone FAC success. Well deserved! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. It's finally promoted now. Guess I'm too dumb to get it right the first time :D FrB.TG (talk) 12:05, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Things happen at the time they are scheduled to. No matter what that "thing" may be. Let me try to make it happen this time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sure you will - all the best. FrB.TG (talk) 12:28, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I hope to meet you there on or after 1 September. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Oopiri copyedit

 * Thanks for the c/e and the wishes. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oopiri
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oopiri you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 11:21, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oopiri
The article Oopiri you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Oopiri for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 11:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oopiri
The article Oopiri you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oopiri for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Missamma PR
Congrats on Oopiri GA pass, and the opening of Missamma PR. I do hope you used the best of what Pillai wrote. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:18, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I did. And i hope to do well, if people like Primuszm wouldn't actually interfere. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you ! I hope you too find the film a good one i.e. beyond its weaknesses compared to The Intouchables (which i find rather straight and emotionless at times). Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Although many reliable sources don't give music reviews for Tamil/Telugu films, here is one for Thozha. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:20, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Missamma
I hope the PR attracts more comments; these Hindu sources may also be used if necessary ( and ). Kailash29792 (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Both are trying to convey the same thing to an extent, but i see something actually useful. Shall use it. I don't know whether the PR can attract some comments before it gets archived. But i hope to begin the FAC right away after completing Eega's. And i hope that you too shall be free enough to be listed as the co-nominator. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Too bad it didn't gain any comment, even after being open for more than a month! Besides, I recently decided that all major informations about Missiamma be moved to its own article as there are indeed some major differences between the two films. As opposed to both versions of Pathala Bhairavi which are nearly facsimiles of each other, with minimal differences. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Please check your talk page, . It has something for you before you could proceed. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I have shortened Missamma as much as I could. Although it may not be a potential FA, I still think it needs to stand on its own, separate from Missiamma. Now I think only the lead, production and themes sections now need further shortening. Can you see what can be deleted, and tag the same? Kailash29792 (talk) 04:44, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I am not actually free today, hence would like to take some time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:48, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikibreak
It's time to remove the message at the top.PhysicsScientist (talk) 03:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Cant keep repenting more and more. Thanks for the heads up. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Template:cite AV media
I realised a few days ago that in this template, the parameter "time" can be used to denote the start time, but I haven't yet identified what to do to properly denote the end time, or denote the time-span as a whole. Still, it is a superior substitute to anything like "Clip from X:XX to X:XX". Kailash29792 (talk) 13:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Tried something. One example here.
 * Actual:
 * Experiment:
 * And, the result was like, " Eega (Telugu) (Motion picture). India: YouTube. 16 December 2013. Event occurs at 01:28:22 and lasts upto 01:28:32"
 * I find this better. Any comments? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:43, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, it seems more professional than the procedures I used to follow before. But I think the "publisher" field should contain the film's production company, and the "date" (or simply "year") should contain its release year. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Genuine. Worth trying. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I think this info I was given today should settle it once and for all: in the time field, we enter the time span (eg: 1:00 to 2:00), then create a new field "time-caption" in which we type "from". You saw me doing this in Missamma didn't you? Kailash29792 (talk) 13:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I did. And i thanked you as well. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Tutak Tutak Tutiya
It is the Hindi title of a trilingual film produced in Tamil, Telugu and Hindi languages. But it was moved from Devi (Tamil title), itself moved from Abhinetri (Telugu title). Since all three versions are being produced by different studios and have different titles, don't you think it's high time the article be split into three? , what's your idea? Kailash29792 (talk) 07:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I feel it should be reverted back to Devi. The film was initially conceived as a Tamil film and features predominantly cast and crew from the Tamil film industry, with minor changes for each language. Maybe treat this article like Irudhi Suttru or Oopiri - where the article's title remains in the film's main language? Editor 2050 (talk) 18:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Filmfare Award for Best Film – Telugu
Although Mayabazar is described as having won the award, the article of the award says it was introduced in 1964 (at least one of the two articles is wrong). I couldn't find the info about Mayabazar win on page 234 of the cited source, but perhaps the actual page number is different. Could you do something about this? Rentala Jayadeva (who discovered that Bhakta Prahlada was released in 1932, not 1931) may know the answer. The closest way I can get to RJ is his FB page, but I won't risk it. I asked Danny if he knows something, but he said the award was introduced in the 1960s (I seriously doubt this is a case of WP:FRUIT, considering he did not elaborate on it). Kailash29792 (talk) 06:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If you can find a proper evidence, good. If not, just remove it by citing proper sources in the summary for the argument. Let everyone know it in detail in the article's talkpage and provide the sources there too. But, don't give up blatantly. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I think I may have traced the origin of this dubious claim: this edit by User:Bhishek, a sock of you-know-who. Since RJ and I have a mutual friend, I guess I'll just ask him. But as of now, the claim about Mayabazar Filmfare win is out as the source does not mention the film anywhere in it's body. Ditto with those film festival claims. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Good work done by proper editors are often overlooked and criticised even by celebrities. Claims by blocked users and sockmasters are copied by national newspapers and people jump with joy. What a pity! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:28, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Mail
You've got mail! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8108:1BF:AB8C:7449:4780:58FD:B8F2 (talk) 12:38, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If that is the case, Frankie, I didn't get your mail. Please resend it. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I am copying what I wrote to you in the so-called email: Hi Pavan, I am FrB.TG from Wikipedia. don't mean to bother you but would you be kind enough to review what I consider to be my final work on Wikipedia - the FAC for Bradley Cooper? It'd be nice that I could get it over with ASAP and could stick around till it's promoted/archived - FrB.TG (talk) 16:10, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I replied 12 hours ago, that i would try to do it and have asked you the reason for retiring. You didn't get it there? Alright. Reply here. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Received your mail. Replied. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:31, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Yo! You forgot to translucde (or whatever it is called) your nomination in the WP:FLC queue. - FrB.TG (talk) 11:01, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heaps up, . Also for the one at the FAC. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:23, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Help
Hi Pavan, I created an article on Valluri Balakrishna, but I am finding difficult to get references. Can you try to find the references for me?.--Ravichandra (talk) 00:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * , i can help, provided i am given some time. BTW, impressive work in both here and Telugu Wikipedia. Keep it up! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:38, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot. You can take your time for gathering the information.--Ravichandra (talk) 05:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks for the award. I too am happy to see it become a FA finally! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:22, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations!

 * Thanks for the barnstar, . First of a kind in my collection. And, it is kind of coincidence as Baahubali: The Conclusion has been formally introduced globally today. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:43, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Oh yeah, sorry, I forgot to reward you yesterday, been very busy haha. Amazing achievement!! Congrats amigo!!♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Doc! :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I know how hard it is promoting Indian films, particularly contemporary ones so it's one of the biggest achievements for Asia on here this year.! Can you put the FA up on WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge for people to see?♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:40, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I've added it in the Article achievements section and have added myself as one of the participants. Did i do it properly? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * You did yup, and it looks great, thanks! As this gets support I'd like to set up a 10,000 one for India at some point and state contests for Tamil Nadu, Kerala etc. We'll get there I hope, but the smaller 1000 one for Indian cinema might be an enjoyable place to start!♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:52, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The 1000 one for Indian cinema can help the articles not only the ones on Telugu and Tamil cinema but also Kannada and Malayalam cinema. The latter has just started evolving (i did review a GAN here) and i am sure that this contest may encourage them big time. It is better to start this next year though; many Indian film article contributors (including me) are students who shall be busy until March/April with studies and exams. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yup that's the idea. A way to really spread out editing and target weak areas or csub subjects which rarely get attention. The Africa Destubathon is currently doing that and getting people working on all 55 countries. You'd never see that otherwise. The Challenge itself isn't a contest, but potentially you could have a general contest for Indian Cinema or even Tamil Cinema or Old Bollywood etc. Something to get people working on the articles and being rewarded with books about indian film or whatever.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hope this does work. I don't have much idea on Indian film books; the ones by G. Dhananjayan which won the NFA were declared a case of WP:POISON recently. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:02, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

The 1000 Challenge (Indian cinema)
Hi, I'm going to set up WikiProject India/The 1000 Challenge (Indian cinema). If you, Kailash,, and any others are interested I'll find time to start it soon. Should be fine and you could probably have a contest next year sometime.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:36, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm ready. I hope that others too are. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:39, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I thought of Indian cinema as it has some of the most passionate editors on here, better than the editors working on Hollywood articles ironically. And you're very much one of those with your work!♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . I really begun missing Krimuk90 and FrB.TG (going to retire) now. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It would be great if I knew how to buy books about Indian films over Google Books, so that it would save me the exertion of buying them physically. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Somebody should create a Bibliography of Indian cinema, a full list of books about Indian films and actors! I thought I created something like that once!♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:06, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Amazon is the place to buy books. The contests I run give out Amazon vouchers to the most prolific editors. Books can be expensive on Indian films, so only the most prolific editors could win them. But I tapped in Tamil cinema and a few books turned up. If you could all identify some books about film which would help you to contribute to wikipedia and you'll love to own I can set something up so you can win those books by destubbing or cleaning up stale old film articles. Pav might like to have this for instance. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 00:11:13 -- 00:11:19 ;-) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

So I did, I created Bibliography of Hindi cinema. You want ones on Bibliography of Tamil cinema and Bibliography of Telugu cinema too to browse books?♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Would be happy enough. I'll add in whatever I can find. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:19, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Count me in!  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 06:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Would love to join! Will be there for it. Great work on Bibliography of Hindi cinema. Kaayay (talk) 08:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

,, , a present for you :-), WikiProject India/The 1000 Challenge (Indian cinema) is up, feel free to adjust it to your own preferences, but I just gave you an initial design which might be suitable. All yours, let the cinema and Indian projects and their editors know and get everybody on board and contributing!!♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * , just to clarify, a source like this is what I want to be able to acquire online. You can't expect to find it in any bookshop since it looks like a periodical, rather than a book. Physical copies could be found in libraries, but every library is bound to be ill-fated like this one. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Rudraveena
When I see Chiru's early filmography, much of his roles are performance-oriented. Why doesn't he do such films anymore I wonder? Well, what's your favourite song of the album? Mine's "Lalita Priya Kamalam Virisanadhi. Kannula Kolanini..."/"Ithazhil Kathai Ezhudhum Neram Idhu. Inbangal Azhaikkithu...". — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 17:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * According to KB, "Chiranjeevi has both Kamal Haasan and Rajnikanth in him. Not only can he do action, he can also act." The image trap made him embrace the inner-latter, but his affair with the inner-former never ended. My favourite songs are two. One is "Lalitha Priya Kamalam" and the other one is "Manava Seva Dhrohama, Kala Seva Kadanna"/"Maanida Sevai Dhrogamaa, Kalaivaani Nee Sol". I loved the remaining too, but the latter's visuals really make an impact compared to the others. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Visuals are the strength of KB's films. In Sindhu Bhairavi, Pothan's character has a crush on Suhasini's character, which he expresses by a poster saying "Sollathaan Ninaikkiren" (Been wanting to say it, The "it" is his feelings for her.) Coincidentally, "Sollathaan Ninaikkiren" is KB's 1973 film of the same name starring Sivakumar, also the star of Sindhu Bhairavi. "Manava Seva Dhrohama, Kala Seva Kadanna"/"Maanida Sevai Dhrogamaa, Kalaivaani Nee Sol" is pretty good too. "Enna Samayalo" is another classic. So is the title song "Unnal Mudiyum Thambi". The last two are really feel good.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 04:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Including Sindhu Bhairavi and Rudraveena, the other KB films i've seen: Apoorva Raagangal, 47 Rojulu, Avargal, Idi Katha Kaadu, Maro Charitra, Thillu Mullu, Arangetram (parts), Anthuleni Katha. Rudraveena was indeed a special visual drama. One scene which stands as an example is where a mother and daughter have only one sari to wear. It stings very hard every time. So is the one just after "Manava Seva" where Chiranjeevi is left shell-shocked after the death and returns home, only to be accused by Ganesan of 'sangamam' with Shobana. Boldness is what Rudraveena has to offer. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Talking about visuals, this is my favourite scene in the Tamil remake. Just look at the frames and cuts - which represent the conflicts in the ideologies between that of a father and his son - that happen when Kamal converses with Sambhar (:P). &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 09:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeed a beautiful scene. However, in the original, Ganesan and Chiranjeevi could not afford a table. :p Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Sambhar — Neeyuma? My grandparents always refer to Gemini by that name. In case you didn't know, Pavan, its actually a nickname coined by the Tamil film industry fraternity as Ganesan performed in soft roles and hardly in any daring or action roles (Kappalottiya Thamizhan, VK and Mayabazar are some exceptions though) and he spoke in a soft tone too. This article by Sify says why (last paragraph).  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 05:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Okay. About Sambhar, yes i do know about that; i came across this when i was working on Missamma. In Unnal Mudiyum Thambi, Kamal had a stronger voice than Gemini and that actually helps the character of Udayamurthy indirectly. In Rudraveena, if you've seen the above clip, its SPB vs Chiru and i dont know whom to vote for. One thing for sure. Gemini's character does need a stronger voice to evoke hatred, at least for our Telugu audience. So many "love" us for what we are: unassuming fools watching crap every Friday. Not everyone is a Baradwaj Rangan who can make rude comments sound poetic enough, right? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Soggade Chinni Nayana copyedit

 * Thanks for the c/e. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Glad to help.  Mini  apolis  13:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Happy Diwali!

 * Thanks for the wishes. Lord's grace; wishing you and your family the same. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:56, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

File
In which websites can I get free files for uploading and how to know whether a file is free or not?PhysicsScientist (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * As far as i know, we have two free image sources for film actors and actresses. One is Bollywood Hungama; here, only those images listed under "Parties & Events" are permissible. Second is Flickr. Here you have to search for compatible licenses and mostly, finding absolutely free images here is very very difficult. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you.PhysicsScientist (talk) 13:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * How to remove the logo on the file. (Link:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhysicsScientist (talk • contribs)
 * Only possible through Adobe Photoshop. Have you uploaded the file yet to Wikimedia Commons? Kailash29792 (talk) 14:36, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Not yet.PhysicsScientist (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I installed Adobe Photoshop Express but did not understand how to remove the logo.PhysicsScientist (talk) 03:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Because you did not install the actual Photoshop I believe, which I have. If you have uploaded the image, please share the link with me and I will overwrite it with a de-watermarked version. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Here is the link.PhysicsScientist (talk) 12:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Geethanjali (1989 film)
I don't know if you ever intend to take it to GA, but I think has some potential, since it has been greatly covered in Conversations. But if you need info from the book, I'd be happy to share. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Please share those. I don't know whether i would end up making it a GA, but expanding the article would be helpful in the current scenario. I started Rudraveena with the same view, and now it is a future GAN. I cannot rule out Geethanjali but it is a film i didn't like much; perhaps i have to blame the crappy quality of the current DVDs. Please do share those pages. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It often happens; you develop something as a pastime and it eventually becomes so well developed, that a GAN seems inevitable. This happened at Pelli Chesi Choodu too I recall. I'll send you the pages by tonight. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Behold. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Soundtrack non-free images
Hi! Unlike other, since you have shown maturity in understanding that non-free soundtrack images are not allowed per MOS:FILM and WP:NFCC, can you self-nominate the images that you have uploaded? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Alibaba DYK
Now that it has passed GA (thank you for the unbiased review), I think DYK shall be next. Would it be possible to have it appear on the main page on January 17? , what do you think? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, we have space for 'date-specific' nominations in DYKs as well. But make sure that you nominate the article ASAP. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 11:59, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * And so it begins. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:18, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * You should list the nom under the 'Special occasion holding area' section. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 13:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Rudraveena (film)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Rudraveena has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Two GANs at the same time
While I wish you all the best for Rudraveena GAN, don't forget that Soggade Chinni Nayana is yet to be reviewed. I wonder if Jaguar or Ssven are available for reviewing it. I also found a bunch of posters, but (unfortunately) I can't read Telugu. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I'll take care of the posters. Worry not. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:46, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I'll take on Soggade Chinni Nayana if that's alright with Pavan.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 03:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I shall be happy if you take up the review. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:45, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soggade Chinni Nayana
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soggade Chinni Nayana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 08:41, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Feeling happy
I'm really happy right now as my college results (final semester) are out. I've made it with first-class honours. Thanks be to god, my family and everyone who has supported me (including you guys). Wanted to share my happiness. I'm now a Chemical Engineer. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 03:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Congratulations buddy. Wishing you the best for a new future ahead. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Congratulations!! Well deserved!!♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Well done Ssven!! That's amazing news! Congratulations! JAG  UAR   12:03, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Congratulations Ssven. So are you on a break from studies or preparing for PG? Kailash29792 (talk) 12:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Preparing for the upcoming GATE Exams which will get me into IIT Madras hopefully.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 11:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Congrats and ATB! &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 11:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * So is this further education you're doing at the moment 16-18 age group, like A-levels or college in the UK before going to university? ♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I am in my early 20's and am younger than Kailash and Ssven2. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Time passes by, and we graciously age But, somehow heart bleeds to accept That the progress happens at the cost of innocence Losing the joys of a unassuming child We ponder over mundane mayhem as an adult May you be humane and happy studying As education is actually awarded by life Through Experience, which is far divine!

Lines from one of my favourite Telugu books where a daughter reads her father's final letter (it has more to say than this; i stopped here as it is the only text relevant to the situation) before commencing her career (which we are never told). Enjoy learning and ATB, my dear friend. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

So Ssven is well into his 20s? That's odd, I would have thought getting into an engineering uni like ITT Madras would be done more at 18 or 20. Or is engineering like becoming a doctor, you don't fully qualify until mid 20s because of the study load?♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, firstly, one completes his twelfth grade in India by 17/18. Then, B. Tech or similar Engineering degree takes nearly 4 years to complete and hence age crosses 20. Post graduation takes two years more. Even by delayed consequences, at 25, you're done. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Congrats ! Had to wish you and All the best for IIT Madras! I apologise to Pavanjandhyala for using his talk page. Kaayay (talk) 12:58, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't mind my talk page being a place to celebrate my friend's success. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Congratulations and wish you do well ahead in life. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 03:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Congrats. Wish you a bright future ahead. 👍 --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 04:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soggade Chinni Nayana
The article Soggade Chinni Nayana you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soggade Chinni Nayana for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 04:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Soggade Chinni Nayana
Hi! Good job with Soggade Chinni Nayana! Just read it. I'm sure they'll make a Hindi version :). Now you guys will have to teach me how to write a "Good Article"! Kaayay (talk) 12:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the kind words. I don't know whether this film would be remade into Hindi, but I feel that SRK would be an ideal choice (if he accepts to do), especially as the ghost. I'm sure you would give us a good article soon to read and remember. Any Hindi film/actor/celeb planned? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Haha, I doubt about a good article coming from me. I usually concentrate on old Hindi films and artists, and it's very tough to get comprehensive details about them. But I think you all do a great job with each article. Kaayay (talk) 13:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It is always heart-warming to see the old films being given the respect they deserve and I wholeheartedly appreciate your efforts. But, i am someone who believes that the present must not be ignored while unraveling the past. Once in a while, you can focus on the good contemporary releases. Say The Lunchbox, Pink, and Dear Zindagi (this is arguable though). :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:28, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

FYI
Hi Pavanjandhyala, FYI, since you have no doubt interacted with these accounts: please see this. Upsetting, I'm sure. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Upsetting indeed. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:47, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rudraveena (film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rudraveena (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rudraveena (film)
The article Rudraveena (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rudraveena (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rudraveena (film)
The article Rudraveena (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rudraveena (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you so much. But, you will have to be energetic enough until i leave this place for good. Until then, haha! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your participation at Cooper's FAC. FrB.TG (talk) 11:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * +1 :) &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 15:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * _/\_ :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * How about adding actors of the bygone era (like Waheeda Rehman, Sharmila Tagore, et al?) Of course, spread across all 'woods'. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 18:44, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Haan bhai, zaroor. Humhari sapnon ki rani Ranaut ke baad aayegi.  —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 10:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Hii
How are you? Hope you remember me. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I remember you for sure, Yash. Good to see you back. How are things with you? BTW, Eega is a FA now and Tamannaah's filmography is in its final stages as a FLC. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:10, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * My life has changed a lot since last time. I am now currently studying in a film school, pursuing my B.Sc in direction. Lets see what happens. Congratulation's on your recent success, and I'm sure Tamannah's FLC will pass with no difficulty. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * All the best, Yash. Hope to see more of you here. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:09, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks I'm hoping the same. BTW, do you have any plans for Baahubali? Yashthepunisher (talk) 18:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, i don't. I am happy working on smaller things. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yash, which film school BTW? —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:31, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Sssven2, it Asian Academy of Film & Television. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

FA
I am planning to nominate Aitraaz for FAC. Since its a small article and the fact that the sources for older Bollywood films are hard to find, it can't be expanded further, so I was wondering if you could tell if its a good idea? Krish |  Talk  17:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I think so. Did you try finding additional sources using Titodutta's Indian newspaper search engine and that by Eazyhomepage? Kailash29792 (talk)  17:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * No, I didn't. Let me try. Krish |  Talk  17:34, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Sadly there are no sources about the production and filming of Aitraaz. By the way, these search engines are very useful and I will definitely use for my other articles. Thanks for sharing this with me. Krish |  Talk  18:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have nominated the article, please do put your comments here. This is my first solo FAC. Krish |  Talk  21:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * All the best, Krish! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:10, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Rudraveena (film)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Gundamma Katha The Hindu
Here is Narasimham's article on the film. Do put it to good use. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Passengers
Holy fuck! It's Rotten Tomato score is 32 and Metacritic score 39. I thought this would be a mind blowing science fiction romance film. This is shocking. Jennifer Aniston, Chris Pratt and the director of The Imitation Game? and the result is this? If I can remember this was "the most admired script in Hollywood" and it turned out to be a dud? I thought the trailers were amazing. What are your thoughts? Krish |  Talk  14:00, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Blame it on the PR team for misleading. We saw a mega example about the same recently here for an emotional drama film. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

All the best for 2017!
 '''Hello , Enjoy the Winter Solstice and the Christmas and holiday season'''. Thank you for all your good work during 2016 in maintaining, improving and expanding Wikipedia. All the best for 2017! Cheers, — Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh &#124; Buzzard &#124; 16:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for the wishes, Mr. Jones. That was lovely. Wish you the same. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Congrats! &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 13:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you both for all the help you did. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to all!

 * Lovely. Thanks for the wishes, Nanbaa. Wish you the same. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Shriya FLC
With reference to this, the list is ready. Would you be interested in reviewing the FLC? &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure. Will be there. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)