User talk:Wrestlinglover/Archive 7

Re:PhenomenalKev
PhenomenalKev and TNAWrestling2009 both got blocked, but TNAWrestling2009 kept doing the same thing to his own userpage. Both userpages were protected as far as I know. As for Cheers Dude, considering his attitude with me when he first showed up, I'm not surprised. That 180° turn he made at the drop of a hat came a little too easy for me.  Hazardous   Matt   16:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I thought the first half was great, as was Angle/Jarrett. I felt the Knockouts, Sting/Rhino and the main event were flat though.  Hazardous   Matt   16:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Although, with the injuries they got hit with, I can understand how the PPV fell short. Hemme and Kong both had injuries, Nash had blood poisoning, Sting was complaining about his knees (probably time to hang up the boots) and couldn't have a long match. It was just a rough time in the company.  Hazardous   Matt   16:54, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I think TNA is always going to be criticized. If you look at the comments on 411 you can tell that half of the people don't even watch the product. They read a spoiler and say "Oh, that show sucked". I haven't been able to watch Raw all the way through in two months. I skip the first half-hour interview and then I never finish the main event because the endings are so predictable.
 * TNA is working on long-running storylines and trying to push as much talent simultaneously as possible, which I applaud. Russo is finally getting a chance to prove that the Millionaires Club vs. New Blood had legs if it had been given a chance. I don't know. Hopefully they'll start getting some serious recognition.  Hazardous   Matt   17:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I know a lot of people like to refer to Jeff as "Triple J" but really, if you've seen his matches in TNA he makes plenty of people look great. Angle. Sting. Joe. Lethal. His match with Kenny King should've been a squash but he let the kid look good. Jeff knows he needs to make stars for his business, not be one. I do think the roster is a little in shambles and they're trying to find where everyone goes. Only so much to do with 2 hours of TV though.  Hazardous   Matt   17:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I think JJ is at the point where he knows he doesn't need to main event anymore. I think he realizes the talent he has. Joe, Styles, Daniels (when he comes back), Kaz, Young, these are all guys who could be (and have been)on the main event. They just need to organize the tag team division and get something going for the X. It's disorganized, but potential is very much there.  Hazardous   Matt   17:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

PPV
No, the discussion did not say editors choice. The discussion was that editors have their own preference. COMMONNAME is a Wiki wide thing though. James Storm, for example, has been known only as that for 12 years.  TJ   Spyke   22:01, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I won't revert for now, but I technically could per COMMONNAME. The only reason I am not yet is so you can continue the discussion at WP:PW. I don't see how it will help articles get to FA status by ignoring guidelines and policies like COMMONAME.  TJ   Spyke   22:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Reverting vandalism doesn't count towards 3RR.  TJ   Spyke   22:53, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

RE:Help
Is there any need to delete it? We could just stick a talk page template on the page and leave it be, in case there's any need for discussion in the future. Cheers,  Dooms Day  23:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you're right. I'll go ahead and delete it.  Cheers,  Dooms  Day  23:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The only WWE ref that's gonna wind up in there will be for the theme, and I've a back up if the GA reviewer doesn't like it. I'd have thought that a self published would be preferable, in that case though.  Cheers,  Dooms  Day  23:38, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Shelley vs Sabin was an amazing match. Easily one of the best I've seen TNA produce.  Had to be around 15 minutes, and no interference.  Really great stuff.  Cheers,  Dooms  Day  01:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nash is apparently hurt, I don't know if it's legit or not. So they brought out Cute Kip.  Cheers,  Dooms  Day  03:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Their justification is apparently that he's a 10 time tag team champion, and part of New Age Outlaws and DX. Cheers,  Dooms  Day  03:53, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The elimination tag was fun, Shelley/Sabin was awesome, Sewell/Bashir was alright, 3 way tag match was pretty good, women's tag was weak, Angle/Jarrett was really good, Sting/Rhino was a mess, and the end tag match was a good hardcore contest. I'd say overall the event is worth a 7 or 7.5, with Shelley/Sabin easily a 9 or more. Cheers,  Dooms  Day  04:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The show got saved by Shelley/Sabin and Jarrett/Angle. Without them, it would have been a total flop. Cheers,  Dooms  Day  04:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

realiable source
is wrestlezone considered a realiable source?CMJMEM (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

what sites are realiable.CMJMEM (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

RE:
I know. I reverted 2 times. But he keeps adding without any reliable sources. I told him on the talk page. He didn't listen. If he does it again, I will take to Aiv, ni, or 3rr. ₰ imonKSK 01:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Gotcha ;) No more editing on that page. ₰ imonKSK 01:19, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Late reply to Christmas greetings
Thank you for the Christmas greeting. My apologies for the late reply. Something off-Wikipedia came up and I've been away for the past few weeks. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

TNA Tag Team champions
That list serves no purpose. What is the point of listing every reign a wrestler had when the table above already lists it. Sure its a table for teams but the info is clear enough. It just takes too many space. Imagine a team goes on to have some eight reigns. You split in wrestlers and it gets too big and complicated. Plus what happened to the combined reign lists which are more relevant? Secretaria (talk) 4:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You mean for the combined lenght lists? I mean it works for teams who had one single reign, but combined reigns i don't know if there's a template that can deal with that. Is it possible for money inc combined reign lenght to be automaticaly updated with a template? Oh and I didn't knew about the "&" issue. WWE's tag team pages are like that. And Why did you delete the combined reign lists I had restored? The way it is still doesn't make sense to me. Secretaria (talk) 17:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:
Wow, I make way too many edits to your talk page... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * We'll see. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 11:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Just a sucker for punishment, huh? Dude, you're crazy. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 10:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey Will
I have opened a TNA related discussion that I would like your input on. See here Cheers, JakeDHS07  05:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Nitpick
It's only a small thing but I've noticed in the Reception part of PPV articles you always put SLAM! Sports as rating a match/event "8 out of 10 stars". SLAM! doesn't use a star system because if they did you likely wouldn't need to put "out of" as star ratings tend to be out of five, so you'd just put "gave it a four star rating". Also SLAM! don't even mention the word star, it's just an /10 mark. Also, it's only my own personal preference, but if you're going to write "out of" as opposed to just using "/" then wouldn't it look more consistent to write the score rather than number it, if you see what I mean, eg eight out of ten, or alternatively go with 8/10. Unless something came up in peer review and I'm talking out my arse. Tony2Times (talk) 16:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

ROH Rising Above
Can you point me to the section in the MoS, or an established project consensus, where we've established that events should be named by the date they aired on pay per view? This is asked in regards to the Ring of Honor Rising Above events so we can decide what the proper title is. As I'm sure you're aware, Ring of Honor refers to them by the date they took place, and I'd just like to see where in the MoS you got it from, since I can't find it. I'd personally prefer to take into account common sense, which tells us that if people search for Rising Above 2008, they're going to expect to find the event that Ring of Honor calls 2008. Cheers,  Dooms Day  02:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think the film one can hold up. If you can find the one on pro wrestling, let me know, but I'm just thinking that common sense is the best way to go and to name these by the way ROH does and by the way people are going to search for them.  Cheers,  Dooms  Day  03:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I read through the section and I see the naming convention on wrestling, the SummerSlam example, but I don't see where it says that we should name a pay-per-view event based on the date it airs, over the date it was taped and the date it is commonly referred to. I read through it a few times and didn't catch it - if you've got a quote, or an explanation of how you got to that translation of it, that'd be much appreciated.  Cheers,  Dooms  Day  20:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll go ahead and put it up right now, see what the project thinks. Cheers,  Dooms  Day  21:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Sacrifice
Try checking a site like Online World of Wrestling and other sites that have detailed reports.  TJ   Spyke   06:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:
OMG, I can't believe me I'm replying now, since you left me a message a week or so. I've been busy here and not here, hope you can understand. Anyways, yeah I nominated the article and see where it goes from there. Though, the article is long and I tried removing non-important stuff, but the article is still long. Um, yeah I'm gonna nominate Kirsten Dunst's article in a while, just trying to make sure everything is in place. Good luck to ya with Sacrifice. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I wasn't trying to ignore you, just that I've been focused on studying for exams and the articles here. Yeah, hopefully. You know, I thought the intro. for Sacrifice's FAC seemed strange noting that the article is not extremely well-written and the article is not "important" in wrestling, seems a bit risky. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Again, I'm sorry, didn't mean to offend anyone. ;) Well, I sure as hell wouldn't say that in an FAC intro., it would be a risk, although I am a risk taker, I wouldn't want to do that because it would jeopardize my chances at an FA article. :) Yeah, I guess you could say that. Its like Unforgiven '05, it wasn't that really of a "notable" PPV. Though, Judgment Day '05 was with the "I quit" match. IDK, about JD '08... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Fine, I'll stop. :) I guess you could say what broke the barrier and what didn't. I've certainly had my fair shares in articles that I've worked on and I'm not just talkin' wrestling. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

No Way Out talk edit
I don't want to be blocked because of false accusations, which is why I edited it out. Big Luth (talk) 17:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Unprotecting WWE roster
Don't worry, I didn't intend to. Stifle (talk) 21:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:Sacrifiice
You shouldn't strictly take Giant's and Lockdown's suggestions literally into this article, because each article differs, and each one needs its own attention.-- Tru co  22:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but you saw all those prose problems I found, in the lead as a matter of fact. This is why I said you should have held off its FAC nomination, after seeing the lead, I think you rushed through the process, a good peer review would have helped.-- Tru co  23:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't have done nor said that, if a reviewer sees that, they will quick-fail it for rushing for a silly tournament. You're suppose to ask for reviews, not wait for people to review it, because that's not how peer reviews work these days. If the process was not rushed, it wouldn't have as much problems.-- Tru co  23:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That's the problem sometimes with copyedits by users like that. I would first familiarzise them with the content, and give them a BG to work off of. This is also why a peer review helps to find mistakes like that.-- Tru co  02:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh. Well I saw that you withdrew it. Sorry, that you had to do that, but I think it was for the best; best for your time being and the way its written.-- Tru co  21:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * In addition, did you notify Sandy about the withdrawal, so she could place it on the archived log so it could be archived?-- Tru co  23:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh okay, I just wanted to make sure, because I didn't see that the Sacrifice page was archived. It will probably be archived this weekend. -- Tru co  00:15, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * (outdent)Not really, see WrestleMania XXIV for more on that. -- Tru co  00:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh well, try searching who was the original expander of WM XXIV, and they can give you pointers on it. From my knowledge, I would add things like how TNA got the deal to promote a 3 hour event, what they did to set up the arena, etc.-- Tru co  00:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Have you tried using the The Archive? Tru co  00:55, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You found nothing that you were looking for, or nothing at all for that URL?-- Tru co  01:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, does TNA have a history link on their site that gives an overview on their history? Try looking for information for it on PWTorch, SLAM!, or WrestleView to see if anything comes up about it, if not, then a production section may not be a good idea to implement into this article.-- Tru co  01:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: File:TNA Sacrifice 2008.jpg
File:2000140495840073985 rs.jpg shows what can be done, although its Purpose of use is still not strongly written. Jappalang (talk) 23:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

DYKs
Unfortunately, Did You Know items have to be submitted within five days of the creation or expansion, so Lockdown (2008) wouldnt' be eligible. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Against All Odds
It was announced on iMPACT that the winners of the Lethal/Creed vs. Abyss/Morgan match would face Beer Money, Inc. for the tag titles at Against All Odds. Watch this, around the 1:20 mark.  TJ   Spyke   03:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * TNA is sporadic in adding matches. Sometimes they have a match added to the site after only a few minutes, other times it takes several days. The match was announced though and is official unless TNA says otherwise.  TJ   Spyke   03:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with waiting a few days, but I won't revert. As for the WWE/TNA thing, i've already had to remove it from the WWE page. I have both the WWE page and TNA page on my watchlist.  TJ   Spyke   03:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: Statement
Thanks for letting me know. Have a good break. Garden. 20:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

COMMONAME
COMMONNAME says to use what the average person would be looking for. The average person would have no idea who "Daniel Cuvall" is, but they are more likely to know who Christopher Daniels is. If a wrestler is primarily known for one name (as Daniels is, Styles is, and others you have reverted), then we don't need to list their real name to comply with being out of universe. I am willing to agree with wrestlers that have had multiple well known gimmicks though (like Bubba Ray Dudley/Brother Ray).  TJ   Spyke   22:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I only make the fixes when I am going to make other fixes (like spelling or link fixes), I don't go to a article specifically to apply COMMONNAME fixes. Also, it is not needed to write their real name to maintain a out of universe style. Your example of James Storm, that is what he is best known as. Do you go around changing the name of every rapper just because only fans of rap know who most of them are? No, but some members of the project have this line of thought that we have to be stricter on our articles than WP requires. There are a LOT of Featured Articles that don't even follow some guidelines and policies 100%, yet some editors want us to be more strict than required.  TJ   Spyke   00:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I hope you don't leave. We may disagree on this issue, but you are a good editor and it would be a shame to lose you.  TJ   Spyke   00:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Destination X (2009)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Destination X (2009), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * unsourced article on future event whose venue even is not yet known

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DGG (talk) 02:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Victory Road (2004)
Hi, I am reviewing your article Victory Road (2004) for GA and have left comments at Talk:Victory Road (2004)/GA1. The article looks good. I have made a few copy edits and left a comment for you. I will also email you per your request at the top of this page. I have placed the article on hold. Regards, &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 16:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

TNA AAO
You say per WWE No Way Out. That would go AGAINST your edit then. The No Way Out article uses small type for the matches (which looks nicer), excludes managers, and just uses ring names. So I was actually making the table more like the No Way Out one. Why would you cite the No Way Out article only as a good example only to undo a edit that makes AAO look more like it?  TJ   Spyke   00:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * They were written the exact same way though. The only differences is the actual info (i.e. venues/locations/event name). The way the matches in the table are written is the same, format is the same, etc. The No Way Out article also has the matches written "wrestler A vs. wrestler B in a --- match for the --- championship" with no real names and no managers. 01:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I just went back and looked. The only difference is the text size. The version of the table that was in when NWO became a FL did not feature real names or the managers either. The only change made after that was making the font size smaller. Could you restore my edits to AAO (minus the small font) so I don't have to worry about approaching the 3RR limit? 01:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This is the version that was promoted to FL, and it did not feature real names.  TJ   Spyke   01:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That's because someone added them in after it had become a FL. It became a FL without them.  TJ   Spyke   02:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 17:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

RE:
Don't worry, I love you. I was reffering to the time you and Matt argued and Matt left because of you. Please don't take it personally. ;D So are you ever gonna come back?  Simon KSK  20:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Please stop creating drama, Simon.  iMatthew //  talk  // 00:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

AAO
They DID officially announce it on Impact 2 weeks ago. They said that the winners of the Creed/Lethal vs. Abyss/Morgan match would face Beer Money Inc. for the tag titles at Against All Odds. They reaffirmed that last week. This is such a trivial issue to be fighting over. The match was the first AAO match to be announced though.  TJ   Spyke   01:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Um, it was made official 2 weeks ago. As soon as they announced that the winners of the match would get the title show it was official. And last week they did say that Creed and Lethal would be getting a title shot.  TJ   Spyke   02:06, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

MsChif
Sorry to interrupt your retirement broadcast but I thought you might like to know I finally got round to doing up MsChif's] article. I was probably a little overzealous with the information but I figured it's best to have it there to be deleted than not there at all. Happy reading if you have the time [[User:Tony2Times|Tony2Times (talk) 01:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 20:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Your sig is messed up. Check raw sig in the preferences.  Simon KSK  22:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Signature
Hey there. Just letting you know you're signature threw up a little bit. . Not sure if it's a glitch or you made a change. HAZardousMATT toxic 17:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Long time, no talk
As the heading implies! :) Hey, how are you? Dude, your semi-retirement officially sucks! I miss having a laugh on here with you! Hey did you ever get my email? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I love that song! :P Oh no, why are you miserable? Take your time replying to the email, it took me long enough to reply in the first place! I was just wondering if I'd dreamed sending it! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 00:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * One little whine doesn't make you a bitch! It takes at least two. :P How will getting a girlfriend enable you to hang out with your friends more? Or am I being really dense, and you meant that getting a license will let ya hang out woth your friends more? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, well that's handy! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you not think so? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow, one syllable! You're in a really talkative mood today, huh? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

<--Yea, I know what you mean. Like, nothing interesting has happened recently in my life, unless you count exams, which I don't. So yeah. Hey, got a question for you. Why would TNA do a pay-per-view with all the titles on the line, and have them all retained? What's the reasoning behind it? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 14:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I gotta disagree 'bout D2D. I thought it was absolute shit. "Extreme" Elimination Chamber was such a terrible match, and the other matches just sucked. Even Hardys vs. MNM wasn't that good, though it was probably the best match on the card. Gotta point out, making No Way Out look shameful won't be too hard. Have you seen the card? Cena's gonna retain the championship, so it'll be him vs. Orton at WM, either Edge is gonna retain and face HHH at WM, or HHH will win the championship, because I heard HHH is pushing for a championship match at WM. AGAIN. The Shane/Orton match should be good, as long as Shane gets in some of his crazy spots! Swagger vs. Finlay = no one cares, and the HBK/JBL match might be good, all depends on how well JBL can go in the ring. From what I heard, I didn't watch it but my bro did, the X Division match was fantastic at AAO. He did say the ending to the Kong/ODB match was terrible, and that ODB came out of the match looking like a glorified jobber. Ok, gotta say this right now, I can't stand Booker T. He's overpushed and overrated, and if Styles beats him for the title at the next ppv, I'll watch it just so I can laugh at Booker. Who is in the frontline? I've never been bothered to find out, 'cause the angle reminds of the whole nWo angle. Always seemed like such a rip-off to me. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, now you see, that chamber you came up with had the potential to be awesome. Because bloody Vince had to fuck with the legacy of the original ECW, he made Lashley ECW Champion. Probably the least extreme guy ever. And he won it in an "extreme elimination chamber". Utter bullshit. I've never liked Booker. Granted, I've never seen any of his WCW stuff, but in WWE, I find it very hard to remember a really entertaining match of his. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I will. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * WWE's fucking up again. I couldn't believe it, I don't get the channel that ECW's on over here, so I go by the internet, and I read "Christian returns on ECW", and I just went HOLY FUCK, you have got to be kidding me. That's ridiculous. Poor Christian. Forever a midcarder on ECW, fighting with or against the likes of Hornswoggle. That's depressing. On another related note, I am annoyed. TJ Wilson debuts in ECW as well tonight, he is absolutely incredible, I am such a fan of his, and nobody is going to give a rat's ass that he finally debuted on WWE tv, because everyone will be talking about Christian. With good reason of course, but still. I hope TJ doesn't get screwed as well. D'you think WWE could fuck up 2 people's career in the one night? God, I hope not. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 03:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Unless HHH gets his way and is reunited with his wife on Raw... Yea, I know it sucks. Wouldn't it have been awesome when all those cuts were going on in WWE a few weeks ago if Cena and Batista had been released? We all know HHH wouldn't get released, but maybe they could shunt him into a backstage position. Imagine how much better WWE would be. RKO is probably the best thing in WWE right now. His whole psychotic thing is freaking awesome, and is a lot more entertianing than anything else that's going on. Matt's heel turn is second, and apart from that the only entertianing things are Santino and Miz/Morrison. Kozlov, HHH, Cena, Khali, other overpushed morons are not interesting right now. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 03:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

<--Maybe, but at least it's entertinaing me right now, unlike everything else. *shruggs* Oh well, that's wrestling for you. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 04:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * And how long do you plan on keeping me waiting for good wrestling? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 04:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent. Why will you be meeting them? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 04:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hope it does. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 04:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks good! I take it you're going to rehire Petey Williams? If you do my brother will probably become your slave for life out of gratitude! :P ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 05:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you saying the Wrestling Observer is wrong? LOL, don't let the FA reviewers hear you say that! So, do you think Lance Hoyt has actually been released, and Williams is a work, or are they both works? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 05:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

<--Fair enough. We'll have to wait and see if Young gets released won't we? :) Though, according to the spoiler reports I read it was Williams and Young who lost a "Loser Leaves Town match" to Beer Money, but I've only heard of Williams getting released. Strange... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 05:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, when you put it like that, it certainly seems like a work. Anyway, I gotta crash (it's 06:10) here. Talk to ya later! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 06:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Re
I recently deleted Yahoo messenger from my computer but I'll get on MSN messenger. Don't worry, its compatible. I just need your Yahoo name again. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 03:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * add me at bulletproof3_16@hotmail.com.-- Unquestionable Truth -- 03:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Question
Just wondering because I'm not sure myself, why I can't have the image you took off on my page? Thanks in advance. The Scare crow ...

Newsletter
I started a discussion for you and Truco here so the two of you would stop reverting on the newsletter. Argue it out, and stop having a really stupid slow-paced edit war on the newsletter of all things. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm aware of that, but still! Of all the things to fight over. Whether its William of Jason or whether we should use Christian. Was driving me insane watching unfold. *Sigh* No, I will be in a calm and happy place today, stupid things will not bother me... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nah, don't worry about it. I get wound up easily by stupid things. What's been so weird about your day? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, important thing first! Will! What the hell do you mean you were almost in a wreck today? What happened? Secondly most important - a date? Yay, go Will! Is it with the girl you were talking about last time? Third, hmmm, kinda violate WP:CIVIL there, huh? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:57, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Dude, I don't drive and even I know that you should always pay attention! Christ almighty. See what you've done? I've taken the Lords name in vain, as if I cared. Seriously though, please be careful! :) Secondly, chill a little, please? I know what you mean, and I've left a message at the newsletter talk page about the fact that you never mentioned anything about TNA, but try and calm down a little. Pretty please? Deep, happy breaths, oh, great, now you're turning me into DDP circa 2002. Thanks man, :P ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Silly you! :P I don't miss DDP, that stupid positive thinking gimmick drove me mad after a while, though he was entertaining at first. I've never really seen anything else of him, except the whole stalking 'Takers wife thing, and the less said about that the better. Replied. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

<--As an aside, did you ever see this? I created it at the end of January in celebration of your fine work. :P ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! :) The selected articles are all featured articles, and since we had some WWE ones, and I figured we should have our first TNA ppv as one too. :) Hopefully you will, what are you working on now, or are you just wandering wround editing everything like me? Although check out the history of Nelson Erazo. I added nearly 100 refs... Exhausting and tedious work! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you have any idea how many subpages you have? Dude, it's a lot. But that's not a bad thing, it's a good thing. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Problem is though, that TNA has a new one every month. You'll never really be done. Just to be, y'know, depressing. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You're mad. I still don't know how you write ppvs. I can't stand them. I stick to bios now, except for some minor cleanup and vandalism reverts. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 03:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Jesus, I haven't seen that in a while. I musta finished that around, I dunno March or April of last year. Nearly a year ago... Yea, but I don't wanna write in the OOU format, I found it difficult enough to write in the old format using jargon and just saying "Performed Sweet Chin Music", instead of whatever you have to write now. Plus, I disagree that the ppv articles need more work. The Cleanup listing is mostly bios, and since I'm not going to have time for a big project like a ppv, because it'd take me two/three weeks to write one I'm happy with, I'm sticking to decreasing the cleanup listing. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 03:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

<--Whereas, I think I'm awesome at bios. *cough Jeff Hardy cough Matt Hardy cough* Much better than at ppvs anyway, while I do think you do a great job with the TNA articles. Like Talk:Victory Road (2004)/GA1, you had one problem to fix, to get it to GA status, which is amazing. Remins me of the Hardy Boyz GA. Admit it Will, we're just freaking awesome. :) Divide and conquer, I take the bios and you take the pay-per-views. Working out pretty well so far, huh? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 03:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Question, is this true? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 03:46, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, maybe Richards will be more than a jobber in TNA. Hope so, I like Stevie. We probably should. We'd make a hell of a team. Course, we'll have to wait a few months for you to unretire and me to pass my exams. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 03:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No, not really. I'm open to suggestions. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 04:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Anything but an event. I'm not that fussy. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 04:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I suppose the championship article would be the hardest to source reliably, so lets knock that one off. I have an idea. How about we get a Good topic? I'd quite like another one, I'm greedy! We could pick a team get it to GA, and get the members article to GA. Good topic in the bag. Besides, you have a featured article, and good articles, now you need topics! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 04:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

<--No, I hadn't. Dude, thats a lot of topics! Ok, not NJPW, AJPW, or WCCW, 'cause I know nothing about them. WWE already has two with Hardy Boyz and Vince's Devils, so ECW, WCW or TNA. I'll give you a choice, you can pick the promotion, or you can find out about my mystery topic that I started thinking about a few weeks ago, and is a big ass motherfucker! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 04:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, I was thinking The Brood (professional wrestling) - that would be the main article, and then David Heath (wrestler), Adam Copeland, Jason Reso, Edge and Christian, Matt Hardy, Jeff Hardy, and the Hardy Boyz. See what I mean about a big ass topic? 8 articles in total, though 3 are done... Yea, TNA works for me, but you're going to have to chose, I know practically nothing about TNA teams... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 05:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, both Christian's Coalition and The Angle Alliance would be a lot of work due to the sheer number of articles involved, and out of all the members only Angle from The Angle Alliance is a GA already. I have no interest in doing the Main Event Mafia, so that's gone immediately! :P I think America's Most Wanted would be quite easy with only four articles to do, and I think LAX would be hard because of Hector Guerrero, Ricky Vega and Germán Figueroa - I doubt there's a wealth of info on them on the 'net, especially not reliable sources. I think it's down to a straight choice between The Brood and America's Most Wanted. :) Have to admit, I'm leaning more towards AMW, simply because it's less work. We should see if can work together before doing 8 articles! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 05:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I like the idead of doing AJ. I think, mainly due to my brothers influence, that he should be a GA, and the ROH section will be simple to source. Official website past results Shall we settle on AJ then? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 05:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep, sounds good. If i find myself with any free time over the next dew weeks I'll see what I can do with it. Looking through the history of the article, is it a vandalism target? I see quite a few reversions, that could be aproblem as far as stability is concerned. Think I'll watchlist it now. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 06:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, I don't suppose he's done any shoot interviews or anything? We might be able to find them on the web if he has. If we can't, we could merge the early left section with the personal life section, because there's not much in the early life section at the moment anyway. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 06:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

<--I know that. Jeff Hardy is like that without going overboard like is the current trend imo. Same with Mike Lockwood. :) I don't know, if it's used in a storyline I would hesitate to add it without a source saying it's actually true. That's a good song, as an aside I love Any Lee's voice. You did mean to link to that song right? Kind of random... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 06:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't mind an FA! :P Yea, I think Michaels' article does a goo job of staying the right side of explaining things to a non-wrestling fan, but I wouldn't be so sure if it was ever nominated for FA. They like having everything explained out. :( Here, my favourite Evanesence song ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 06:57, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I do like that song, but something about Lithium gets me everytime! :) This is my favourite song atm though. Utterly amazing. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 07:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No appreciation of genius! LOL. Yea, I tend to gravitate towards some less well known (especially over here) stuff, Crash Romeo for instance I think I'm probably the only person in Ireland to have ever heard of them. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:48, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You are determined to make me watch TNA vids, huh? Anyway, what'd you think of the No Way Out results? I'm waiting for your HHH rant... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 09:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 23:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Email
One should be delivering itself to your inbox... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That promo is crazy! I look forward to a rant in email! Thanks for the good luck wishes! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 23:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied. Don't sell yourself short dude, that was a highly entertaining rant! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 09:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, if someone has to break it, I'd rather it was HBK, but I'm hoping it's neither. :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 09:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, you're welcome to your opinion, but I disagree! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I suppose so, but then again, Kane is basically just a joober to the stars now, so the probability of him ending the streak is pretty slim. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

<--True, but we're talking about WWE here... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You mean you wish he owned the Kane gimmick so he could go to TNA and get a push! :P ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 00:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * D'you mean that those 05 ppvs were the best in TNA? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, ok. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey! I know that match! I've seen the whole thing, my brother (aka the TNA mark) showed it to me. Damn good match! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 11:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah. It was brilliant. It was a great match. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

<--I'll see if I can find them. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea, my brother was thinking about getting it. I dunno why he didn't. Maybe it hasn't been released over here yet. (On average there's a six month difference between wrestling DVD release times in the US and over here) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. I'll save my money and get my bro to buy it! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Re:
Hey Will, I'm good, how 'bout you? Me? I've been working on actors stuff, basically, only thing I'm good at. Oh, I'm actually retiring from writing PPV's, after the outcome of Vengeance, I'm done. How 'bout you? What have you been working on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * They are too much of a hassle and it was [when writing them] stressing me out. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I guess. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll still work in wrestling stuff; bios. basically. Only thing that I am "good" at. But, I just won't expand a PPV. I haven't retired from wrestling, if that's what your thinking of. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I thought it might have been a bad joke or something like that. Right now, I have Ethan Hawke and Jon Hamm at GAN. I next plan in working on Josh Brolin's article. Also, I still have Kirsten Dunst at FAC. Um, me and Nici are working on MVP's article, maybe getting it to GAN, as well. Oh well, it seemed like it was gonna take a long time to "fix" JD, I don't mind. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

TNA Impact! (video game)
You might want to be careful. Technically you violated 3RR on the Impact video game article (4 reverts, and technically the user wasn't vandalizing). In the future, contact another editor if you reach 3 reverts so you don't risk getting in trouble.  TJ   Spyke   03:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Story of the Year myspace ref
For this case Will, it’s different because the source is directly from the lead singer, confirming Story of the Year's involvement with the song. Please do not revert.-- Unquestionable Truth -- 02:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Re:Crap?
Whoa man. I'm just joking with you. Don't take it personal. Its just a little humor, but if it offends you that much, I apologize and will not do it again. Considering that it is "recent professional news" and it is one of the most notable things WWE has done television wise, it is notable. If any TV wrestling show gets a high rating since about 2 years, that is notable. WWE has not pulled any 4's for awhile (especially in non-special episodes). -- TRU  CO   01:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry about that. I didn't think you would have taken it in offense. I apologize and will not do it again in the future.-- TRU  CO   02:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Still. I will refrain from it.-- TRU  CO   02:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool.-- TRU  CO   02:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

MEM
You sure because it certainly looks like Kurt gave him the boot. Vermon CaTaffy 8 (talk) 04:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

No Big Deal
No harm done my friend.. I overreacted so no need for apologies on your end. Hot Stuff International (talk) 06:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Tag title
Overall its okay. But you need to remove references to the match types, its irrelevant to the history of the title itself. Also remove "As of (date)" because its redundant since in the lead you will state "As of (date title was won) the champion is (champion". I hope you add a lead :)-- TRU  CO   21:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh ok. Stuff like that can stay, non-notable match types don't need to be mentioned.-- TRU  CO   22:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I was just stating in general.-- TRU  CO   22:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 21:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC) The  Helpful  Bot  21:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:TNA World Heavyweight Championship.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:TNA World Heavyweight Championship.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)