Talk:Deadly Premonition

NPOV and NOR
I removed a large portion of this article because it contained unreferenced, severely negative information. While the edit may contain relevant information to this game, please see the above links to ensure that information added to Wikipedia meets both a neutral point of view and does not contain original, unsourced information. avs5221 (talk) 20:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Reception rewording
The 'reception' section needs rewording, it gives the impression that the game is actually good, whereas this is not the truth. The reviews clearly show that the game is terrible, but they are giving the game a high score purely for comedic purposes and cult-like aspects. The IGN review is clearly the most accurate and least ignorant review there, and this is coming from someone who generally dislikes what IGN has done to the journalistic integrity of the video game reviewers' job in general. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.78.171.65 (talk) 11:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

You're a fag, and I eat jizz. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.190.254.155 (talk) 19:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

You DO know that out of 10 reviews on Metacritic, 7 of them are above the 65 mark, 4 of which are in the 80+ range, right?

I reworded it back to reflect the actual reviews, and not your personal opinion of the game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.12.162.107 (talk) 07:15, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I changed it back, AGAIN. I don't care if you don't like the game. 'Mixed reviews' indicates close to a fifty fifty mix of poor reviews and good reviews. THIS game, specifically, has the majority in the positive according to metacritic, and quite a few of those are in the top tier scores. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.12.162.107 (talk) 01:45, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Gameplay Section
The Gameplay Section of the page is unbelievably wordy and reads more like a player's guide than a description. "Hide Mode" is particularly bad for this. Anyone else think it needs tightening? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.59.140 (talk) 07:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

either a fan or an Ignition staff member has been at this article
I edited the Reception section of the article to be less biased in tone, and more "just the facts, ma'am".

But the Gameplay section still reads like biased codespeak typed up by a fan or advertiser, and as the poster above me mentions, it's far too verbose.

I'm not informed enough about the game to tackle that section responsibly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.191.236.95 (talk) 13:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Screw it. I just deleted everything but the intro paragraph in the Gameplay section. Frankly, the broad summary it provides is enough to be appropriate for a wikipedia page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.191.236.95 (talk) 01:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Question?
I just started playing this, and its not specified in the "plot" section of this article, but why are there teleporting zombies everywhere? I suppose I could play more, but I just think that the whole plot should be listed in that section, like it is with most other games, books, and movies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.8.8.19 (talk) 21:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The plot section is pretty underwhelming, but the game doesn't really explain the zombies. There's been speculation as to where they come from, but it's just speculation and not appropriate for the article. Reach Out to the Truth 22:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * From what I've seen of the plot, they just sort of appear-- I haven't gotten far enough into the game to really understand what they're all about. I'd actually really be up for working on this article with editors if they're up for it. -- Nomader (Talk) 22:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

"Best Worst Game" award from GamesRadar
Ive seen some gamesradar reviews and references, so i guess it's a reliable source now. They gave Deadly Premonition the "Best Worst Game" award, given to the crappiest game they liked. Should that be included in the article, or is it a bit too informal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.13.157 (talk) 21:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Sequels
Swery has announced that he is making a sequel to the game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.192.99.63 (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Greetings, dont forget, that he also announced a Prequel as well, which doesnt seem to be in development atm. 84.173.171.216 (talk) 15:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Polygon in-depth article
http://www.polygon.com/features/2013/2/12/3977154/the-sinners-sandwich-deadly-premonitions-creator-on-making-a-good-bad Axem Titanium (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Deadly Premonition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111116152414/http://www.gameshark.com:80/reviews/3475/Deadly-Premonition-Review.htm to http://www.gameshark.com/reviews/3475/Deadly-Premonition-Review.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101227093512/http://uk.gamespot.com:80/best-of-2010/special-achievement/index.html?page=1 to http://uk.gamespot.com/best-of-2010/special-achievement/index.html?page=1
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616003127/http://www.gamesradar.com/xbox360/f/the-platinum-chalice-awards-2010/a-2010121616912603042/g-20100120142851370015 to http://www.gamesradar.com/xbox360/f/the-platinum-chalice-awards-2010/a-2010121616912603042/g-20100120142851370015
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120108082254/http://www.gamecritics.com:80/daniel-weissenberger/deadly-premonition-is-the-game-of-the-year-part-1 to http://www.gamecritics.com/daniel-weissenberger/deadly-premonition-is-the-game-of-the-year-part-1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Francis York Morgan, fictional character with DID
Hey, I was reading up on some symptoms of a mental illness I have (to make sure I was gonna be okay, and to clarify, I am!) and a brief diversion led me to the category page for Fictional Characters with Multiple Personalities category page. What stuck out to me is that Francis/Zachary York Morgan from Deadly Premonition aren't on that list. I've long considered Francis and Zachary to be great DID/plural rep. I'm not yet familiar with the finer points of wiki editing, but would you guys agree? And how would I go about making sure Francis is listed properly in that category? Do I just add the category to the page, then go to the category and tweak the listing? --Actuallyasriel (talk) 17:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)