Talk:E3 2009

Date
The official E3 site, http://e3insider.com/, says the date is June 2-4, while this Wikipage says 1-4. The Microsoft conference was on the first, but E3 hadn't actually started yet, so, technically, this is incorrect.

Anyway, changing the date. If I end up wrong, just revert it. Thanks.8bit (talk) 03:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Microsoft's 'ground breaking' project natal?
Seem kind of fanboyish to me. I removed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by F4M (talk • contribs) 15:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Project Natal is something major that Microsoft payed a lot of money to display at E3, it deserves to be here. MarixD (talk) 00:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Attending Audience Increase
Under the History topic: "E3 2009 achieved this by attracting an attending audience of 41,000, a 720% increase on E3 2008's attendance." Under the Attendance topic: "At E3 2009 there was a total 41,000 attendees, which is only a 41% reduction of the 70,000 attendee high from 2005 and a 820% increase on the previous years (2008's) E3." One says 720% more, the other 820% more. Which is correct? --Jaryth000 (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


 * It depends on if the E3 2008 and E3 2005 numbers are correct, which I haven't verified yet. If they are, I believe the 720% increase would be correct. My issue is with the notion of gauging the success of the shows based on attendance in the first place. E3 2005 and E3 2006 were big, but were logistical nightmares, which is why the ESA changed it to the Media and Business Summit format in the first place. The reduced attendance was partly by design. Dancter (talk) 18:42, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:E3.png
The image File:E3.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --07:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Electronic Entertainment Expo 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080703184040/http://e3.1up.com/ to http://e3.1up.com/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://e3.gamespot.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electronic Entertainment Expo 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605014512/http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=2&cId=3174543 to http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=2&cId=3174543

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)