Talk:Hazbin Hotel

Category request
Please add this to [ Category: LGBT speculative fiction television series ] as well, which is more useful to find genre shows like this than the more general LGBT drama series sorted by decade/country categories.

Semi-protected edit request on 1 July 2024
Hazbin Hotel s2 is expected around late 2025 or early 2026 HazbinEdits (talk) 22:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  JTP (talk • contribs) 23:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Episode article redirects
-- Alex_ 21 TALK 06:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Pilot
 * Season 1
 * Season 1

There is no criticism section?
Pretty sure this is one of the most polarizing shows of the year. Why is there no Criticism section in it? Oixyplanet (talk) 21:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Various criticisms of the show are covered in the "Reception" section. However, one thing to note is that while yes, this show is very controversial, a lot of the outcry against it just comes from people on social media, not independent reliable sources. That's why there might not be as many negative notations in the reception section. Blubewwy (talk) 23:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Entry needs rewritten.
The quality of the writing present in this article lags well behind that of the majority of entries on this site, and falls short of the standard that viewers would, and should, expect from a Wikipedia approved entry. Several aspects of note are the grammar, vocabulary, and the general flow of the sentences, but the most prominently lacking mechanic is the entry’s sentence structure. There’s little to no variation in how an action, a verb, is attributed to it’s owner, the subject. This leads to the entry reading like a list of bullet points. The whole thing comes off as if it were written by a grade schooler, or else was intentionally written as an exercise to work the readers English language skills, who finds themself restructuring and/or rewriting the sentences as they read in order to achieve a more pleasing, if not at the very least passable, reading experience. The portion of the entry on the animations reception is the most egregious in relation to the rest of the entry, but the entry as a whole stands to gain if more than just that particular section is addressed. 2601:205:4880:B106:0:0:0:81 (talk) 04:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Ok? It seems pretty much like any other lead paragraph in an animation article to me. Don't think there's any issues with it. Blubewwy (talk) 05:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)