Talk:Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade: The Graphic Adventure

FM Towns
This sentence was recently added to the article:


 * it was later updated with VGA graphics and an in-game orchestral soundtrack for the FM Towns; only the VGA graphics were backported to the DOS re-released version.

I've no argument with the idea that the FM Towns version had an orchestral soundtrack and the DOS version didn't, but the word "backport" is a term of art, implying that the art assets were specifically designed for the FM-Towns and then were sort of glommed on to the DOS version as an afterthought. Are we sure this is true? If the art assets were simultaneously developed for both platforms, for instance, than the use of the word "backport" isn't really appropriate. Do we have any evidence that the art was actually backported? If not, I suggest rewriting this sentence. Thoughts? Nandesuka 11:39, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm pretty sure this is true. But a quick web-search found me no evedience. - --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 11:52, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Removed a bunch of catagories
I just removed a lot of catagories from this article. This game was not released on the systems I removed. Check here for a complete list of releases. It is probable that the editor who added them had confused this game with Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade: The Action Game, which is a very different game. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 13:25, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:IndianaJonesLastCrusadeBox.jpg
Image:IndianaJonesLastCrusadeBox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Indy crusde screenshot.png
Image:Indy crusde screenshot.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Reference material
Here's what I've found: That's all for now. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 03:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ACE review
 * Amiga Format review
 * Zzap review
 * CVG review
 * The One review
 * CU Amiga review
 * CGW preview
 * CGW review
 * Compute review
 * PC Mag review
 * Designer commentary
 * Zero review
 * Info review
 * Dragon review in issue 152 (contact BOZ for fulltext)
 * Game manual (includes designer comments)
 * MixnMojo interview
 * Side comment
 * IGN article
 * Possible material
 * Gilbert side comment
 * David Fox interview
 * David Fox retrospective
 * David Fox comments
 * Scan stash from Lucasarts' The Adventurer magazine
 * Brief retrospective in The Adventurer
 * Design process commentary
 * Side comments
 * Noah Falstein comment
 * https://web.archive.org/web/20010121190500/http://lucasfans.adventuregamer.com:80/features/interview_noahfalstein.html