Talk:Kirby Tilt 'n' Tumble

Name change
Minor topic for discussion: should this be listed under "Kirby Tilt 'n' Tumble" or "Kirby's Tilt 'n' Tumble"? I originally listed it under the latter, since this is how it appears on the official website ; however, User:Jason One moved it to the former. At any rate, I am uncertain which is correct. Any thoughts? MIT Trekkie 03:29, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Hi MIT Trekkie. Yes, I moved it. Nintendo's site is wrong -- the title is really just "Kirby." See the box art at Amazon.com for proof. Jason One 03:32, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Ah, figures they'd have it wrong on that stupid website. Thanks. MIT Trekkie 03:35, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Gyro
I don't see the word "gyro" anywhere in this article. I mean, it uses a gyro, should that be mentioned? --gakon5 (talk)
 * Does it use a gyro though? It looks to me like it used accelerometers (especially for the jumping). --Thaddius (talk) 13:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Found a source and added it. --Thaddius (talk) 13:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Why...
does this page link to Banjo-Pilot? --71.8.199.242 (talk) 06:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Reference material
Found this: Game Informer review. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Citation needed-Kirby tilt n Rumble sequel for gcn/ds
there is a citation needed for the tilt n rumble sequel the following is footage of it from spacworld 2001 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rLhIwp2iGk Dude22072 (talk) 22:09, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Removed uncited opinion that playing by tilting a Gamecube is "impractical"
I removed the phrase "which is impractical" from the end of the sentence "Since the sensors are inside the cartridge, the only way to play it on the Game Boy Player is to pick up and tilt the GameCube itself" as it would seem to be an uncited opinion. As a source suggesting the contrary I point to the Summer Games Done Quick 2015 speedrun of the game where playing by tilting the Gamecube is both discussed and demonstrated: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csnrs9i3ALc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.17.174 (talk) 15:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

tot
Not sure what is meant by "Similar tot was planned to require the" but tot is clearly wrong.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  12:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)