Talk:List of Naughty Dog video games

Lead section
What part of WP:CFORK actually supports your removal of the lead section? If anything, it seems to justify its inclusion: Not to mention WP:SALLEAD: Also, see literally every single video game FL. Despite my best efforts, I genuinely fail to see your reasoning behind the removal. – Rhain  ☔ (he/him) 00:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * "it is often a good idea to retain a structured list ... even when a table is provided with basically the same content"
 * "A stand-alone list should begin with a lead section that summarizes its content, provides any necessary background information, gives encyclopedic context, links to other relevant articles..."


 * The keyword here is summary. That does not mean say it in prose, then repeat it in a table. I've moved the prose to the main article, where it looks like it might be repetitive, but that's why we don't get repetitive in subarticles. Skyerise (talk) 00:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I mean, the history of game production by the company is relevant and should be included there (in Naughty Dog), right? And if it's included there... Skyerise (talk) 01:00, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You keep linking to WP:CFORK without actually referring to anything in particular. You're right, the lead should be a "summary"—which is what is;, however, is not. I once again direct you to literally every single video game FL, all of which have significant lead sections. Why should this be any different? –  Rhain  ☔ (he/him) 01:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC)