Talk:Stellar Dawn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discord[edit]

Hello. Seeing as the Stellar Dawn community seems to have fallen apart and dispersed, I decided to create a Discord server in the hopes to bring back the original hype. I have bookmarked this page and will update any changes. Should I remove the server, I will remove this message. If you're reading this, the server should be available but know that there may be few of us. Don't let that dissuade you. It will be difficult to bring every back together but I hope I can do it. Hope to see you guys there. Cheers! Click here to join the Discord server. ~Drirton

Untitled[edit]

Shouldn't someone update this? thier website(www.stellardawn.com) was just released. Im not that good at updating articles and might mess it up so can someone do it?--86.186.72.163 (talk) 15:02, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Have edited the page and fixed all references! Tomsween94 (talk) 17:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fansites[edit]

The reason I removed the fansites is because we have too many. Right now we have six listed for a game that isn't even released! This needs to be limited to say the top 1 or 3. (See WP:FANSITE) OSbornarfcontributionatoration 14:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stellar Dawn Central is an obvious choice, which others would you choose? Pliigi (talk) 15:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From looking at other videogames the general style seems to be to only link to official websites. In addition, all of the RuneScape fansites have Alexa rank's below 40k, Stellar Dawn's own site (stellardawn.com) had roughly 500k, and Stellar Dawn Central has an Alexa rank of 1.2 million! I think it's too early in the game's life to determine what the big fansites are. If you like I could check up the Alexa ranks of the other sites and figure out which one is the top, but since the game is so young, as are the fansites, I imagine this could be quite volatile. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 23:18, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I guess we'll wait. 63.249.118.236 (talk) 02:04, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That seems like the best course of action, yes. Pliigi (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that in the mean time the fansite links should be removed. We are not an indiscriminate collection of links. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 14:51, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Upcoming?[edit]

Should we maintain the reference to 'upcoming' for the status of the game? It's been four years, when do we start referring to this as a halted project (what it actually is)?

174.5.163.20 (talk) 02:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]