Talk:Tunnels of Doom

Proposed merge with Tunnels of Doom
This game is not the subject of any readily accessible reviews or more than passing mentions. Minding due weight, it should be included in a list among the other more popular but underreported TI-99/4A games. czar 21:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * There were a lot fewer reviews in those days. This was TI's flagship game and I think it warrants its own article. Bkatcher (talk) 22:58, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Even if there were fewer reviews, where are the few? We cover topics in proportion to their source material (due weight). If we have only a few sentences on a subject, and it can fit within another article or list, that's the best way to cover it. czar  23:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This article was proposed for deletion in 2012 and was voted to stay. I'll work on expanding it. Bkatcher (talk) 20:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, looks like someone has added references. There's twelve separate references now. Bkatcher (talk) 20:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Where are the reviews? Most of these sources are either primary or incomplete citations—can't even follow the Nat'l Geographic ref in print because we don't have the page. czar  13:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I'm going to merge this- Tunnels of Doom is entirely inside of this list, as in every word is also here. -- Pres N  21:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Move to "Tunnels of Doom"?
I don't see why Tunnels of Doom was moved to this page and not the other way around, when there's only 1 game on the page and that's Tunnels of Doom? It's not really a "list" if it's just one game. Gezegond (talk) 11:20, 28 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Agreed. If it's not notable enough for its own article, it should be deleted, not moved to a single-item "list." Metz77 (talk) 20:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Untitled
I added a paragraph plugging the music I wrote for the program. I have no idea if Wikipedia condones such self-promotion; if not feel free to delete my revision. HMishkoff 19:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)