Talk:Univel

Yes this is a stub, but...
Is there any more to say? HughesJohn (talk) 10:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.cbronline.com/news/novell_formally_announces_the_unix_systems_group
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist
 * http://www.cbronline.com/news/univel_is_the_offspring_of_unix_labs_novell_inc_nuptial
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 00:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Unencyclopedic passage, coatrack concerns
This passage bothers me, partly because it is not specifically about Univel but what allegedly transpired after their demise. It is objectively false, since Linux on the desktop has enjoyed quite a bit of success not measured in market-share. It is also written in unencyclopedic, very judgemental and subjective language. I would not object to a neutral rewrite, if the sources mention Univel or UnixWare and tie into their specific desktop efforts, but if this remains simply a general unhinged rant about stuff that happened after Univel, then I move to excise it from this article entirely. Elizium23 (talk) 03:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't think the phrase "a complex saga" is unhinged or judgmental, and my intention here is to show that Univel was not alone in failing to succeed in this particular market and rather that it was an early chapter in a long story. And I'm not sure what you mean by "Linux on the desktop has enjoyed quite a bit of success not measured in market-share". Measured in what then – that it works? positive reviews in the trade press? user satisfaction among those who do use it?  Maybe if you could explain that further, and point to some sources for it, there can be a change in wording to your satisfaction.  Wasted Time R (talk) 11:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm also not seeing the unhinged-ness in that paragraph. It's a pretty sober paraphrasing of the articles which discuss Unix competing in the desktop arena and the many false starts and offshoots thereof, Univel's product being one of them. (FTR I did tone down some of the more charged wording in the original paragraph.) DigitalIceAge (talk) 06:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC)