Talk:Vampire: The Masquerade – Redemption

Untitled
I was just looking at this game on Amazon.com and it seems pretty clear that there is a Mac version released by MacSoft. If someone comes along to corroborate this, please go ahead and make the change to the article. Decatur 16:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

this artical is horribly shaped, I think this is what you call wikistyle, or something like that. for example, the picture being below the "see also" section.

How about an actual list of the original design flaws that the article references? 77.114.12.23 (talk) 18:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Huebner is undefined in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.119.122.54 (talk) 20:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

"but were polarized by the quality of the story and combat" Who add this fail? The game history quality are caracterized to be one of the greatest of videogames, and deserv a movie for fans of video games — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.88.249.59 (talk) 19:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Useful sources

 * http://archive.arstechnica.com/reviews/2q00/vampire/vampire-1.html
 * http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/vampire---the-masquerade-redemption
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20010210102842/www.zdnet.com/cgw/stories/main/0,11529,2607693,00.html
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20010413184748/http://www.dailyradar.com/previews/game_preview_20.html
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20040614033320/www.cgonline.com/reviews/vampire-01-r1.html
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20010417091133/http://www.dailyradar.com/previews/game_preview_546.html
 * https://archive.org/stream/PC_Zone_Issue_079_1999-08_Dennis_Publishing_GB#page/n41/mode/2up
 * https://archive.org/stream/PC_Zone_Issue_092_2000-08_Dennis_Publishing_GB#page/n57/mode/2up
 * http://archive.arstechnica.com/reviews/2q00/vampire/vampire-1.html
 * http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/vampire---the-masquerade-redemption
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20010210102842/www.zdnet.com/cgw/stories/main/0,11529,2607693,00.html
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20010413184748/http://www.dailyradar.com/previews/game_preview_20.html
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20040614033320/www.cgonline.com/reviews/vampire-01-r1.html
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20010417091133/http://www.dailyradar.com/previews/game_preview_546.html
 * https://archive.org/stream/PC_Zone_Issue_079_1999-08_Dennis_Publishing_GB#page/n41/mode/2up
 * https://archive.org/stream/PC_Zone_Issue_092_2000-08_Dennis_Publishing_GB#page/n57/mode/2up
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20010413184748/http://www.dailyradar.com/previews/game_preview_20.html
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20040614033320/www.cgonline.com/reviews/vampire-01-r1.html
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20010417091133/http://www.dailyradar.com/previews/game_preview_546.html
 * https://archive.org/stream/PC_Zone_Issue_079_1999-08_Dennis_Publishing_GB#page/n41/mode/2up
 * https://archive.org/stream/PC_Zone_Issue_092_2000-08_Dennis_Publishing_GB#page/n57/mode/2up

PC Player sales analysis

 * https://archive.org/stream/PC-Player-German-Magazine-2001-03/PC-Player-2001-03#page/n29

Use of Gameranx
Just noticed that this article uses Gameranx as a source for a few statements, which is listed as an unreliable source on WP:VG/RS. I'm removing the bit about Redemption appearing on Gameranx's top vampire list, but we do need to replace it for the other uses.--AlexandraIDV 22:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

E3 award
It's not "random" to place it first in the reception section since it's a award given before the game's release, before all the reviews were released. Mika1h (talk) 21:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I disagree, the reception is about the reception of the game, dropping a single sentence in there about awards is jarring, especially just dropped in at the start. The subsection doesn't harm anyone, it's literally been there since 2015 and it makes sense to be there. Darkwarriorblake / Vote for something that matters 21:47, 7 October 2022 (UTC)