Template talk:Google LLC

Proposal: split this template into two
I propose that this template into two separate ones because it's a bit uncomfortable to read now due to its big size. -- PK2 (talk) 22:00, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Concur it was too large; I have condensed it a bit to reduce size. The other alternative would be to use Template:Navbox with collapsible groups. Not sure splitting it would be beneficial. --Jules  (Mrjulesd) 00:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2021
Add Google Read Along in the services>others section. 103.67.157.156 (talk) 06:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅, and thank you very much!  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 08:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Collapsible format
Does anyone object to converting this navbox into a navbox with collapsible groups given its large size? If not, I will go ahead and make the switch. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:BOLDly switched, feel free to revert my edit if anyone disagrees. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:54, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 3 March 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Template:Google LLC → Template:Google navbox – The reason I'm requesting for this template to be moved to the new title is to align it with its main article's name, because the legal status suffix of a company isn't normally included in the article's or its template's titles, per WP:NCCORP, and because I personally think that the word 'navbox' is sufficient enough to disamiguate this template from other templates like Google or Google search, per WP:TITLEDAB and WP:NATURAL. PK2 (talk) 05:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose as a completely unnecessary change. Using the corporate suffix/extended legal name for disambiguation is the widespread practice to naturally disambiguate companies with ambiguous names, contrary to the nominator's claim, e.g. Apple Inc., Tesla, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company, Ford Motor Company, Target Corporation, Marvel Entertainment, Meta Platforms, etc. The proposed title also does not "align" with the main article, which is not titled Google navbox. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I can understand that, but this template's main article is titled 'Google', not 'Google LLC', and the word 'navbox' would be used as a disambiguating word in this template's proposed title, like in the titles of some other navbox, sidebar and infobox templates. PK2 (talk) 07:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The template is already being naturally disambiguated. This is an unnecessary change that "breaks" (I use quotes because the redirects technically work, but a long-term goal would still be to eventually update all links) thousands of transclusions. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)