User talk:Alsoriano97/Archive 1

April 2016
 Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of people named in the Panama Papers with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message. I am striking the above message. I misunderstood your edit, partly because the Huggle program shows only the immediate change. So your purpose was good. It would be good to explain not just your change but that you are working on further changes in the edit summary. The removal of a name was a mistake on my part. Reverting an edit is all or nothing. This usually does not matter but in this case took a further change with it. Since there have been further edits by you, I cannot restore your edit without disturbing the further edits and probably not being able to get them as you want them. You will have to do that if you have not done so already. Sorry for the mistake and inconvenience. Donner60 (talk) 23:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! I will restore only two thing and don't worry, I prefer being helped in things that I do wrong

May 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=722315465 your edit] to Dénia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * | leader_party           = PSOE

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people named in the Panama Papers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PRO and Ignacio González. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people named in the Panama Papers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Panama Papers page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=724619911 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F724619911%7CPanama Papers%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for June 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jorge Fernández Díaz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PP and Podemos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 deaths
Please note that to be eligible for inclusion, the person must have had 9 interwikis before their death. Both Rita Barberá and La Veneno fail this criterion, so they were removed again. Please get consensus on the talk page if you think either should be included anyway. — Yerpo Eh? 13:38, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't understand when you talk about "9 interwikis". What did this exacly mean?
 * And about Rita Barberá...she was considerated the Mayoress of Spain, one of the great mayors Spain had (but involved in huge corruption scandals)
 * Thank you,
 * Sorry if my English is bad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsoriano97 (talk • contribs)
 * Please read WP:RY. "Interwikis" is short for "non-English-language Wikipedia articles", and probably shouldn't be used where there is a question of language comprehension.  If you do not understand WP:RY and WP:RY, we could work together to find a phrasing which you can better understand; but it is a guideline.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

-I am very sorry, I am new to this and I still don't understand it. Can you help me? Or can you make the change that I would like to be able to do? Thank you very much and I apologize for the inconvenience,

A big greeting


 * To put it simply: do not add Rita Barberá or La Veneno to the list in 2016, because they are not important enough. Do you understand now? — Yerpo Eh? 13:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

I repeat: she was the mayor of the third largest city in Spain and for 24 years the most powerful of the State. There is the reason for my insistence, in Spain it was, and a lot. Or is it that in my country and in others Frank Finley was so important? I can understand that La Veneno does not, but Rita will grant you yes, and much more than you think. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38075458 http://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2016/11/23/foto/podemos_minuto_silenzio_rita_barbera-152640183/1/#1 http://www.wsj.com/articles/rita-barbera-mayoress-of-spain-dies-1479922282


 * If she was important in Spain, her death can be noted on the page 2016 in Spain. But not many people wrote about her in other Wikipedia languages, so she was probably not so important internationally - only international importance matters for main year articles. — Yerpo Eh? 16:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I notice that, despite the discussion above in which is made perfectly clear that Rita Barberá should not be included in 2016, you decided to add her again. This suggests you are not here to edit co-operatively. If you persist you can expect more official warnings. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 23:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I know, but she have 10 non-English pages. The rules requires a minimum of 9. The rules, are the rules.—Alsoriano97 (Talk Contribs) 22:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinatown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Zone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to 2013, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Arthur, apologise me for this mistake. Have a good day. — Alsoriano97

Deaths in 2017 inclusions
Hi. I have noticed the good work you are doing at the page above. However, would it be possible for you to note the following two things?

1. When coding your subject line, and the reference is in a language other than English, could you please leave one space between the reference part and the icon code; like: " [reference URL and headline] "?

2. When putting the source headline into the reference part, please don't add extra full stops/stops at the end where they don't exist at the reference page.

Otherwise, you are doing some great stuff at the page, keep it up! Thanks. Ref (chew) (do) 20:15, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Good night, Mr. Thank for your words and advice, I only want to help. I am not very expert in Wikipedia so it is quite usual that I make mistakes, that I will learn from them. But I do not understand the second point of the advice, what do you mean?

Thank you and have a nice day. I will learn little by little. Alsoriano97 22:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Each reference URL (web address) has a headline at the top of the page announcing a death. We use that headline in the coding of the entry: like, "reference URL"(space)"reference page headline". But, we ALWAYS use the headline exactly as it appears on the reference page, without adding full stops/periods nor removing them. The only exception is when headlines are written in capital/upper case letters - we then convert them to lower case letters for the Deaths page. The best thing is to go into the edit code of the whole Deaths in 2017 page and have a look at how others do it when they've been coding sources into other past entries. Hope this helps and makes things a little clearer. Good day to you too. Ref (chew) (do) 16:58, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I have already noted today that you have taken my advice on board, and your entries are now perfect from the very first edit. Well done and glad I could help. Happy editing. Ref (chew) (do) 18:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Wikipedia can only work well if those who are part like us try to do things right, so I, as a beginner, should follow the advice of those who know more than me to learn and improve Wikipedia. If you see that I still do something wrong or I make some kind of mistake, let me know.

A greeting from Spain. Alsoriano97 Alsoriano97Special:Contributions/Alsoriano97 23:51, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Sir, for this award. I will keep it with much appreciation. We will continue to do Wikipedia great.Alsoriano97 Alsoriano97Special:Contributions/Alsoriano97 23:29 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red
--Ipigott (talk) 10:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for registering as a member of WiR. I look forward to lots of contributions on Spanish/Catalan women. If ever you run into problems or need assistance, just leave a message on my talk page. You are of course also welcome to contribute to our discussions on the WiR talk page. Hablo tambien Castillano y comprendo Catalán.--Ipigott (talk) 14:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marta Rovira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vich ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Marta_Rovira check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Marta_Rovira?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Gemma Romanyà i Valls
Hello I wanted to invite you to take another look at the article you created on Gemma Romanyà i Valls. I find gender references in it very confusing, and am unsure whether certain events refer to her or her husband. I have my doubts about this article meeting our WP:NBIO criteria, so was considering putting this article forward to Articles for deletion for discussion. However, seeing your interest in WP:WOMRED, which I support, I wanted to offer you an opportunity to address these concerns and to tease out any reasons that do establish notability here, and to fix one of the two citations which does not function. Many thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Santi Ibáñez moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Santi Ibáñez, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. King And God 06:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2017 Barcelona attacks to Mariano Rajoy (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017–18 Spanish constitutional crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anna Gabriel ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2017%E2%80%9318_Spanish_constitutional_crisis check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2017%E2%80%9318_Spanish_constitutional_crisis?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Women in Red June Editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A page you started (Antonio Giuliano) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Antonio Giuliano, Alsoriano97!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Reviewed, thanks for creating."

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 01:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in study
Hello,

I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.

Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 22:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Phil Gowan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phil Gowan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Phil Gowan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 07:25, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Decorations for Luis Planas
Hi Alsoriano97! I see you added honorary decorations to Luis Planas title, however, there is no mention of them in the article itself. Is it possible you could cite where you found these, that'd be most helpful. Thanks! Snickers2686 (talk) 18:11, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Deaths in 2018
Hello, when you add persons to the Deaths in 2018 page, please note that they shall be in alphabetical order under each day. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 13:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Good afternoon. I know that and I try to do it everytime I add persons. This time was just a mistake. Thanks for the report. Alsoriano97 (talk) 13:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Wood (festival) edits
Dear Alsoriano97, please check the result of your 2 edits to the page above. The link you created does not work as it is within the text of an external link already. It also generates an error; see Category:CS1 errors: URL–wikilink conflict. Regards,  GILO  A& E&uArr;  19:44, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Oh Sir, my apologies. Sometimes we do things too fast and we do not realize the mistakes. Thanks for the report. Kind regards. Alsoriano97. 19:53, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Pedro Roncal
Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Alsoriano97, thanks for creating Pedro Roncal!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. When you translate an article from a foreign language Wikipedia, you should provide attribution, as I have now done on the article's talk page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

You like cake!?
File:Blood Orange Chiffon Cake with Mango Curd (Unsplash).jpg Qwerty number1 (talk) 21:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Oops!, As u can seeim not great at that! Will a kittie do?  Qwerty number1 has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}

Qwerty number1 (talk) 21:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

A year ago, you were recipient no. 2240 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Get ready for November with Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Ways to improve Marija Vučinović
Hi, I'm SkyGazer 512. Alsoriano97, thanks for creating Marija Vučinović!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for creating this article, it looks nice overall. There are several unclear sentences and punctuation/grammatical issues which could use some copy-editing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 15:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deaths in 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Plate ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Deaths_in_2018 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Deaths_in_2018?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elio Berhanyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Córdoba ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Elio_Berhanyer check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Elio_Berhanyer?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Frank Robinson
Hi, sorry to disturb you right, but I need some help with something on the 2019 talk page, an admin thinks he's allowed to erase info that he think's isn't notable to him. So I started a discussion on the talk page and I wondering If we could share your opinion. Matt Campbell (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Marta Fabbri


The article Marta Fabbri has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NPOL. There is absolutely nothing inherently notable about being a mayor of a community of less than 1,000 people."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 23:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Marta Fabbri for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marta Fabbri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marta Fabbri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 03:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Carmen Ros Nortes
Nice job messing up this entry. Adding citations that add nothing, just repeat the Vatican announcement, while being sloppy about citations and making the false claim that she is a member. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Fernando de la Rúa
Stephen 23:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Moira Millán moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Moira Millán, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Interstellarity (talk) 18:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Next time try to read all the article and sources. Moira Millán's page have enough sources and citations. Alsoriano97 18:37, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moira Millán has been accepted
 Moira Millán, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! – MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 01:56, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Moira_Mill%C3%A1n help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Camilo Sesto
 Spencer T• C 04:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Guidelines
Concerning your repeteated additions of the same blurb on Portal:Current events/2019 September 19, a reminder of the guideline: "Do not list the ordinary deaths of prominent persons here. That's what recent deaths is for. Exceptions to this rule are made for prominent persons who died in office (such as Pope John Paul II and Omar Bongo) or other instances where the death in itself has a major impact." Also a reminder that a talk page is available for arguments. Wakari07 (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Civility
Edit summaries such as this and this aren't compatible with civility policy. This isn't a battleground. Madness Darkness 21:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

2020
It appears we had an edit conflict. Please reinsert your additions or 18:25 UTC, if you think them appropriate. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Please disregard. The edit conflict resolution system, surprisingly enough, worked.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 18:33, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

2020 Deaths
Why are you removing the picture of the late Edd Byrnes? There is plenty of room for all three pictures and he was a popular Tv star of the 1950s and 1960s. There is no reason for his picture to not be there. Could please ask what you mean by "Not yet". Thank you in advance for your reply.Radiohist (talk) 01:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The discussion is not about if he was enough popular to be there or not. If I hidded the pic is because at that moment there was not enough space to put the pic. When the list will be larger, there's no doubt he will be included.Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * There is clear bias because you keep hiding the pic in spite of the fact that he unfortunately passed before the other people whose pictures you are showing.Radiohist (talk) 14:30, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Removal of Current Event.
Hello, I am wondering why you removed my comment on 2 cases of the Coronavirus at Miami University. I had the section at Portal:Current events/2020 January 28

Also, Why did you remove information about a 500k robbery. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello. I appreciate your willingness to collaborate on Wikipedia and specifically "Current events". But both news are not especially relevant. In "Current Events" news of very important international or national impact are collected, it is not the case of both news. For example, about the 2 university students who have undergone tests for suspected coronovirus. The same thing happened with a Chinese citizen in Barcelona today, and it was not mentioned here because it is not important. And many other cases in Spain and other countries. If it is shown that they are infected, we would open the debate if it is necessary to expose it. Greeting Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for responding. I do agree with you on the suspected students.  However, I do not agree with why a $500,000 robbery on a former NBA star is not relevant.  Could you explain a little more on that? Elijahandskip (talk) 01:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)


 * As I told you: "Stop, seriously. This is a PRIVATE affair with NO international nor national notability. If we were to collect the thefts from celebrities this would be almost full. Please, stop". Alsoriano97 (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)


 * This has received tons of articles, national news source articles, and it has been mentioned on Allen Iverson. $500,000 is a lot of money also.  So far evidence points to it being notable enough to have it mentioned on that day. I agree all robberies don't need to be mentioned, but as this has tons of sources (Just type "Allen Iverson Robbed" on Google and you will see tons of articles about it).  Could you explain how this as "NO international nor national notablilty"? -Thanks Elijahandskip (talk) 19:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Alternative account?
It isn't clear why your user talk page User talk:Alsoriano97 redirects to User talk:Alsoriano. If this is a legitimate alternative account, the justification as at WP:VALIDALT should be explained, and the accounts should be linked as given at WP:ALTACCN. --David Biddulph (talk) 20:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes - to rename your account, go to WP:USURP. The Alsoriano account exists, but has no edits, so you shouldn't have a problem taking it over.  Meanwhile, you should move your talk page back. Black Kite (talk) 20:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads, such as the file you uploaded at Irina Bogacheva (mezzo-soprano), did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TFFfan (talk) 12:20, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Question on notability
You removed my post on Portal:Current events/2020 February 10 about a 500k seizure of cocaine. I am curious what type of seizure (money wise) would make it notable? I would think large sums of money, like 500k on a single guy would make it notable with reliable sources backing it up.

Thank you for replying Elijahandskip (talk) 14:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Warning
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. This is for Portal:Current events/2020 February 10 in reverting edits.Elijahandskip (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

I only admit warnings from admins, not from angry editors. You are not making constructives editions as you are posting irrellevant news in Current Events. You can use use 2020 in United States for this kind of news. Current events is for INTERNATIONAL or RELEVANT FOR A COUNTRY news, not for enlist criminal cases from any country. 500K$ cocaine is more usual than you can think, and usual detentions of Chinese soldiers are not relevant. Check the news from another country to see if the new you want to enlist is important or not. I'm not going to keep this discussion as I'm very busy. Alsoriano97 (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Then you are in the wrong. Any editor can warn you anytime; administrators are only a regular editor who happens to have been granted a button to use to block you by the community, and at the community's behest.  You are mistaken completely, and it is bad faith for you to continue to do so. John from Idegon (talk) 20:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Explanation wanted
Would you be willing to explain why the following is not notable enough for the current events? Thank you for responding. (Trying to prevent editing wars) Elijahandskip (talk) 19:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC) "Monique N. Brady is sentenced to eight year in jail after a $10 million USD and for Obstruction an IRS investigation. (D.O.J.)"

It's not notable because is not a famous case, with a notable or famous condemned. I recommend you one thing, as I know you have good will: try to find out if the news you are looking for is in foreign newspapers. If so, go ahead. If not, you do not need to include it in Current Events. I'm a bit sure this is also not notable in th US. Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Question
Could you explain how the {{current related }] template is not good to put on articles related to topics in the Portal:Current events, especially for the day they were added? Elijahandskip (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * That it's set to current events does NOT imply that the "current events" template should be placed in the article referenced by the news. I have never seen anything like that. The template is mainly used in sections of articles and when they imply news, TRANSCENDENTAL changes that imply that the structure, the existence of that can change remarkably. (For example, the days when there was the effective dissolution of the Soviet nation could be used on the USSR page). Alsoriano97 (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok thank you for that clarification. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Re: Personal message
To Alsoriano97,

First and foremost, sorry for not replying to your message sooner. Life got busy for me and so I couldn't read your message until now. I don't believe that you were actively trying to be malicious with your edits. It was just that with your messages coming off as confrontational, it felt very out-putting considering the other people's edits were just well-intentioned contributions. And I guess what contributed to my outburst was I felt frustrated at feeling like I had to constantly justify my contributions when their (trans)national significance (at least to me) felt obvious. I also guess what lead to this clash was that we both have somewhat contradictory views on what the portal strives for: you wanting a "more globalist and plural vision" agenda, while me being fine with some national content as long as it was tied to national trends. Nonetheless I for my part will try to be more patient on this matter, especially since your actions came from a place of good intentions, and will try to remember that we all just want what is best for this website.

I didn't know that you contributed that long to the portal. I guess I only started noticing you when you removed that smuggling tunnel entry. :P

Sorry if this came off as rambling/disjointed or it didn't address parts of your message. I tried to address the main points as much as I could. Here's hoping we can bury the hatchet and move on. Mount Patagonia (talk) 08:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

P.S. I hope your having a better week now.

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francisco Fernández Marugán, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cáceres ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Francisco_Fern%C3%A1ndez_Marug%C3%A1n check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Francisco_Fern%C3%A1ndez_Marug%C3%A1n?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Alfred Bosch ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Alfred_Bosch check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Alfred_Bosch?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to El Periódico
 * Deaths in 2020 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Deaths_in_2020 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Deaths_in_2020?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to MEP

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haro ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_Spain check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_Spain?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

You need to have a better command of English to make useful contributions to English Wikipedia
Judging from this, your English is far below the level necessary to contribute text to English Wikipedia. There is not a shortage of fluent English speakers in the world, and adding such substandard text is worse than not contributing at all. Taresantia (talk) 12:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not an English native speaker, as you can imagine, but you can't judge my level with such contribution. As you are the first person to make this observation, it's to be understood that my contributions on Wikipedia are not deficient. There is much more work here than judging without knowing the person and their contributions in this web. This is a community where we help each other. Sorry for not being perfect and I will keep working, here. A greeting. Alsoriano97 (talk) 13:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Alsoriano97, I found this post looking back over the contributions of Taresantia. Just a quick note that this user has now been blocked as a previously banned editor.  I'm sure you know this, but just in case it helps for someone else to confirm: your contributions are appreciated, your English is generally fine, and what little grammar problems there are can always be cleaned up by others; it's a collaborative project.  You didn't deserve this message, and handled it with grace. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * First of all I want to apologize for not responding your message earlier, I've been very busy due to university issues. You cannot know how grateful I'm for your message. I know I need to improve my English level, that's one of my goals, and I'm working on it. I'm glad to be part of a community that works together and helps each other to make Wikipedia great for everyone. You can count on me in any case you need it. I wish you and yours have health. Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:43, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Current Events.
Hello Alsoriano07. I wanted to invite you to WikiProject Current events as you have been a long time editor on Portal:Current events. Elijahandskip (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Enrique Múgica Comment
Great sourcing work on the article - I've added my support to the RD nomination (I am just a user like yourself and don't have the final say) Have a great day (if that's possible in these strange times!) Joseywales1961 (talk) 12:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * @Joseywales1961 Thank you for the support, help and best thoughts! I'm up to help you in any case you need it in this community. I wish you and yours have the best possible health. Stay safe! Alsoriano97 (talk) 13:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juan Cotino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Periódico ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Juan_Cotino check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Juan_Cotino?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hi, I'm Dantheanimator. I happened to notice on your user page that you declared yourself a neutralist. However, you also declared yourself a NATO supporter, Tibetan independence supporter, a monarchist, rejecter of British sovereignty over the Falkland islands, among many other sensitive issues. This may result in a conflict of interest in your editing of these and related topics. I therefore recommend that you consider changing your neutrality declaration or clarifying it. If you think my recommendation is false or have any issues, questions, or concerns, please leave a message in my talk page. Thank you. Dantheanimator (talk) 18:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You, are 100% incorrect. COI isn't a state of being....it only applies to specific edits, and your statement here shows a gross misunderstanding of our policies on WP:NPOV. Minimally, you need to retract this. It certainly could be considered an WP:NPA violation without specific edits evidencing it. Since this editor has been victimized by a rash of NPAs lately, I'm sure there are administrators watching. We all have views. There is no such thing as a "neutral" person. Good editors are more than capable of paraphrasing reliable secondary sources. My edits never indicate my politics, and the same is true for most experienced editors here. Keep your irrelevant opinions to yourself. This post says much more about your abilities rather than the owner of this talk page. John from Idegon (talk) 22:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for you comment! Receive a kind greeting.Alsoriano97 (talk) 19:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * and Alsoriano97, I was going to comment earlier on this issue because I saw this talk page and read this but backed off because it's nothing new that I'm a cowardly editor, I easily back off because I don't like confrontations. But I'd like to say something. I'm Argentine, and on the Falklands/Malvinas issue I'm totally, totally neutral young man; i couldn't care less about both, the Islanders' wishes and Argentine government's wishes. I just hoped for dialogue and a turn-the-page policy. However, If I'm going to edit any Falklands/Malvinas-related article, I'd try to be as neutral as possible, supporting either cause If I do have a source. I also believe like John from Idegon that nobody is neutral on here, nor anywhere else. My best wishes to all of you. CoryGlee (talk) 20:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I am tremendously sorry for this poorly thought out comment. I have only been with Wikipedia since the end of 2019, so my knowledge of the official policies, standards, etc., is limited to whatever I am told from veteran editors like you. I retract my statement. Thank you for informing me of the proper rules, I greatly appreciate it. To my knowledge, I am not allowed to delete any threads of another Wikipedian's talk page. If I am wrong, please tell me, so that I may learn and fix this issue. I personally do not care who owns the Falkland islands or about most of the issues I said, I just thought they were contentious issues. Again, I am very, very sorry for this post. Dantheanimator (talk) 17:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

In response to your reply
Thank you for responding and good to hear. Regards, Dan Dantheanimator (talk) 20:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
I appreciate very much your apologize. Obviously, you don't have to worry in anything and I'm not going to take it hard on you, we must to make it easier. I understand your message and as I said, I have a commitment to be neutral in Wikpipedia. Having also read your response to CoryGlee in the message above, I must acknowledge your responsible attitude and your commitment to wanting to improve. That's great! Best wishes to you and yours. Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your kind message, it just made my day feel a lot less stressed. Also, thank you for accepting my apology and thank you to the rest of the Wikipedia community for correcting my wrongs. Hope you and your relations are well. With many thanks and lots of kindness, Dan. Dantheanimator (talk) 02:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
I love kittens and I choose one to thank you for your cleaning-up of the Current Event sections. ^_^ (my favorite emoticon) ^_^ -- Cheers..

CoryGlee (talk) 13:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC) 
 * I also love kittens!! Thank you CoryGlee! Best regards ^_^!!! Alsoriano97 (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

<!--== Current events == May I ask why you persistently keep removing clearly notable news items related to the United States on the current events portal?

For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_June_4&diff=960856093&oldid=960854261 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_June_4&diff=960755639&oldid=960752864 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_May_26&diff=prev&oldid=959159745 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_May_21&diff=prev&oldid=958187119 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_May_17&diff=prev&oldid=957238359 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_May_14&diff=prev&oldid=956712491 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_May_14&diff=prev&oldid=956700671 And here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2020_April_27&diff=prev&oldid=953505576

And there's probably way more. You do understand that the United States is a part of the international community, and international readers such as myself from the UK will be interested as to what is happening in the U.S., right? You don't seem to have a problem with stories from other countries, like the one on April 27 for example, about the court in Vietnam sending a Facebook user to prison, one could argue that does not qualify as "internationally notable", yet you did not remove this. You appear to have some sort of anti-Anglo bias going on here. Please try to be be more neutral in your editing. Local stories is one thing, but removing national stories from any country because you assume others won't be interested is unacceptable. GWA88 (talk) 08:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for you message and I'm going to clarify my editions. It's very simple. US is part of the international community and yes, and an important country, but this doesn't mean that any kind of national relevance new has to be named in the Current Events. Do an exercise, if instead of US, it was another country, would you add it?. I'm not sure. Also try to find out if the event has been broadcast by news portals and newspapers from other countries with another language. If yes (as in the case of the change of criteria of the University of California), Current Events is itssite. If it is something relevant, not if pure gossip or low impact news. It's easy: 2020 in the United States exists for some reason. I also tell you that if my edits were not undone, it is because I was probably not so wrong. I have sometimes erased news about the United States, the reason has been explained to me and I have admitted that I was wrong. So it is not that I have an anglophobia, but I realize that this world is no longer Anglo-centric and, therefore, neither is Current Events.Alsoriano97 (talk) 10:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)


 * As far as I'm aware, the Current Events portal has never been "Anglo-centric", at least not in my six years of editing there. If you have proof of this so-called "Anglo-centrism" then please, feel free to provide it. As for whether or not I would add a domestic news story from another country, I do that all the time. I am interested in global affairs, not just news in the USA/UK. Go look through my User contributions, they speak for themself. Just please try and be a little more considerate when you edit the Current Events portal, as removing stories just because you assume it won't interest international readers is just ignorant. GWA88 (talk) 11:35, 6 June 2020 (UTC)-->

2020
You added Francisco Rodríguez Adrados today (practically no coverage outside Spain), and now you are edit-warring to remove a musician with coverage in nearly every continent of the world? Do you not see the problem here? Black Kite (talk) 16:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Are you able to see the number of non-English articles that Francisco have and not Tim. It's very easy. You may find that if someone has a lot of articles on wikipedia, it's for some reason. Alsoriano97 (talk) 16:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree (which is why I haven't removed Francisco) - but look at the worldwide coverage of Smith's death as well. Black Kite (talk) 18:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure "worldwide coverage" from non important and massive news portals is enough. Nothing from Spanish "El País", "El Mundo", "La Vanguardia", neither from French "Le Monde" or Italian "La Repubblica", or Greek and Russian ones. Only from those related to music and mostly are in English. Alsoriano97 (talk) 18:56, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * So you'd be OK with me removing those without large news portal links (which would of course include Adrados, and about half the people linked at 2020)? 21:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * No if those have more than 9 non-English articles on Wikipedia, a clear indicator of their relevance.Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Well I think you need to make up your mind then' are people more relevant because of their non-en articles, or because of their actual news coverage? Black Kite (talk) 22:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * It's very very simple: both. There are cases in which the death is covered by news from all over the world because they are well known or very important people (Hosni Mubarak, Ennio Morricone, Little Richard) while others do not have that impact on the news but as they are recognized in the field of their specialization or are relevant politicians despite being unknown outside (Landelino Lavilla, Nexhmije Hoxha, Edén Pastora) have more than 9 pages on Wikipedia. I have my mind very made up. Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * It might be worth looking at Cardiacs in other languages, though, rather than Smith. Black Kite (talk) 11:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from SS Britannic (1874) into Eleanor Roosevelt. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I honestly appreciate that you let me know about it, because I did'nt know. I will consider it next time! I've changed the writing, perhaps it will not be necessary to add the template. If it's insufficient, please let me know. Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi
Hi. Please remember to include an edit summary when you remove huge amounts of content. Thank you ^_^ --CoryGlee (talk) 19:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Tymchenko has been accepted
 Ivan Tymchenko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Ivan_Tymchenko help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Utopes (talk / cont) 17:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

2020
Please don't add people unless they have significant international notability. Not every international footballer is of equal notability. Why are you so desperate to have these on the main Year page when they are not even on the Year in Topic page? Let's have some perspective here. Deb (talk) 17:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Easy: some of them had international coverage (search in Spanish, Italian, French, Portuguese news portals) and more than 9, 10, 15 or 20 Wikipedia pages. Nor do I understand your obsession now to delete them and not at the time. Alsoriano97 (talk) 17:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

That's great! Thank you Gerda! Be safe! Alsoriano97 (talk) 09:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chestnut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Alert from WikiProject Current Events
Hello. The WikiProject Current events format is currently being updated. However, one new change is a section for "Current discussions". The Portal:Current events has debates all the time to determine if things are notable for the portal (international news) or if they are better suited for a place like 2020 in the United States. In the past, small 'edit wars' have taken place between editors over topics. This new section on the WikiProject is a new place where editors can discuss between each other and have an easy access to 'outside opinion' from other participates. Members in the Current Event WikiProject are welcome to invite other editors that have disagreements to start the discussion on the WikiProject. (Unlike RFC's, discussions about topics would be about 1 week or whenever the topic is no longer relevant from the WikiProject). Thank you for reading.

(You haven't directly joined the WikiProject, but you are an active editor in the Portal:Current events. I wanted to inform you about this new discussion section.) Elijahandskip (talk) 19:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tabaré Vázquez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galician.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Use the summary box before making an edit!
Hi, I have noticed you keep removing information, especially on the Current Events portal without using the summary box. You can see how this can easily create confusion and make people suspect vandalism. I see CoryGlee has already raised this issue with you on your talk page and you have clearly continued to ignore this. As for your recent insults directed at me in your edit summaries (ironic that you actually bother to use it then) when reverting me such as referring to me as "little boy" and accusing me of lacking "professionalism, seriousness and respect". I have been editing on Wikipedia for 6 years and I have always tried to respect others. I am not biased. I am not an aggressive editor but when I see people going back two years on a portal and removing content without any explanation, I will revert that and I will consider it to be potential vandalism. You also continue to remove news related to the United States because it's "domestic" but you rarely if ever remove "domestic news" from other countries. Therefore I can conclude that you are a biased editor and that requires monitoring. That is how I noticed you going back to sneakily remove 2 year old content and I will continue to watch your edits closely, Alsoriano97. Also, please stop making insults in the edit summary box, if you have a problem with me then take it to a talk page and keep it civil. Thank you. GWA88 (talk) 08:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I have not insulted nor do I intend to do so, for which I apologize If I've offended you. The fact that you delete content that I do knowing that it may be there justifying "Domestic", it seems quiet childish to me, tbh. You say that "you continue to remove news related to the United States because it's" domestic "but you rarely if ever remove" domestic news "from other countries". Evidently! Only when for the simple fact of being from the US it seems that even any news of less impact even in that country must be respected. Not everything that happens in the United States is of global importance, despite the fact that there are many editors and users of that Portal who think so. I'll keep trying to make Current Events plural and not "US-centric". And if I have deleted something that is much more important than I have believed and that is what they have made me see, I have always respected it. How much news is there about that country that I have NOT deleted? And do you really think that the change of "Head of State" of a sovereignty such as the Order of Malta is "Domestic News" and should not be published there? I think the answer is more than obvious. Yes, CoryGlee warned me that he should always leave the "edit summary". Can you really say that I never do it because sometimes I have not done it? If you are monitoring me, you will see that most of the time I do it and, if not, it is because of speed in doing the deletion. Nor do I need anyone to monitor my activity here, and after more than four years and 10,000 editions, no one has ever done it or needed it. And no, I am not a biased editor. Stubborn perhaps, but never biased. Do not waste your time. Thank you and stay safe. Alsoriano97 (talk) 08:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I do not consider protecting the Current Events portal as "wasting my time" at all. The fact you say "I'll keep trying to make Current Events plural and not "US-centric", when in reality it is far from "US-centric" or "Anglo-centric" as you put it before, let's me know you do have an agenda in your editing. There is room on the portal for news from all over world, regardless of whether that news is from the United States, Spain, Angola, The Falklands or even Antarctica! It's an international portal. There is a big difference between domestic news and local news. For example, you removed a news item regarding Michigan on 2020 December 14 because it was apparently "local news", despite the fact Michigan has a larger population than many countries and the story itself was related to a wider national issue (the U.S. presidential election and its aftermath). Again, a clear bias. I also suspect you have made sockpuppet edits, including this recent one, which coincidentally geolocated to Catalonia, where I believe you are from. Yes, I will continue to watch your edits, especially because you're going back to remove historical edits on the Current Events portal, perhaps believing nobody would notice. By all means, keep on editing the Current Events portal but do not think there won't be a pushback from others if you continue with your biased anti "US-centric" agenda. GWA88 (talk) 10:22, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Do you see that this edition has been deleted by me again? You don't think that once it was explained to me, did I understand why I should mantain that there? And I see that I also have to explain myself: it was me but I did the editing with another computer where I was'nt logged in. It's what it is when I'm "up to my eyeballs". And about 2020 December 14. Everyone is aware of the post-electoral situation in the United States, and I would tell you that they are even certainly worried. But from there to consider that there may be some type of interest beyond the State in which a Rep. has been suspended from a commission there's much difference. That there are mass demonstrations, demands, SCOTUS resolutions, a certain type of comment from national leaders may be relevant for the Portal, but not that. If instead of Michigan it were Catalonia (taking into account the serious situation that the region experiences and has experienced) I would not even rethink publishing it. I also tell you that Michigan has more population than many countries doesn't mean that everything that happens there has international relevance. And stay calm, Current Events does not need to be protected from me. It has not been before and it will not be now. I think it is necessary that I explain my agenda well to you: propose interesting and important news from other countries and question those less relevant that concern the US. But I insist, how many times have I deleted things about the United States compared to what I have left? And you also force me to explain something that is completely unimportant in my opinion: if I did the 2018 edition of the page, it was because in an article I saw a link to it and I wanted to browse. No, I am not in the business of analyzing previous years because I neither have the time nor the desire. And finally, I find it curious that you want to condemn someone who goes "US-centric" when, in short, everyone tries not to be "country-centric". With all due respect, but I think you're being pretty subjective. Alsoriano97 (talk) 11:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * My point, Alsoriano97, is that I shouldn't have to keep reverting you. You're the only one I know who is currently making these disruptive and counterproductive biased edits by removing legitimately notable news with good sources. I'm also curious as to why you were okay with this domestic news item on November 28 because it had "international coverage" but not others with international coverage? Seems a bit inconsistent of you. If you see actual local news on the portal, then by all means remove it, I would too. For example, if someone put a story on about a fatal car crash in their town or some random crime covered in their local newspaper then of course that isn't of international interest, but let's say for example a U.S. senator or member of Congress resigns because of some scandal or a Spanish politician is charged with corruption then that is notable enough despite being domestic news because it's a major story in that specific country, and major news in specific countries make up the majority of news on the portal itself. Like someone said recently, if you removed all the "domestic" news from the portal, you would removing most of the news on the portal! You need to have a perspective about these things when it comes to editing a portal like this. I hope we can progress beyond this misunderstanding before it becomes a conflict of interest. Thank you. GWA88 (talk) 07:51, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry for my late response. The truth is that my intention was never to create a problem, so I am fully prepared to make progress in solving any misunderstandings. We are a community and together we must cooperate to make Wikipedia a better place. I'll try to be more meticulous when it comes to erasing, especially in summarizing my edits. But I will continue working so that the Portal is plural. I only ask that you do not monitor me, it can make me feel certainly uncomfortable. For everything else, a pleasure to improve. Thanks and take care. Alsoriano97 (talk) 16:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thank you very much !! Alsoriano97 (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2021
ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by StealthGuy1227 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your use of the word "Domestic"
In the past, we have butted heads a few times over different things that are notable for the Portal:Current events, however, I do notice you use the word "domestic" a lot. Things that are domestic might still be ok for the portal. For example, for today's portal, we have a resignation of an Canadian official. That is domestic as it won't affect me here in America. Same thing with impeachment articles against Biden. They won't affect people in Canada, but it is still a national ordeal for the country respectively. I know what you mean by it, but maybe use the word "domestic" less when removing/challenging things in the portal as it does have a big meaning. Sound ok? Elijahandskip (talk) 22:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

About Buccaneers
Regarding the events mentioning the Buccaneers, I have to respectively disagree with you about this event being domestic. This event is notable for the fact that the Buccaneers will be the first team to play the Super Bowl on their home field (no NFL team has ever done so). Not only was this reported by BBC and American news sources, but also by CBC of Canada, France24 of France, RepublicWorld of India, and the Irish Times. There is also no doubt that the final results be added to the current events page but I think the Buccaneers defeating the Packers is notable because of the fact that they will be the first team to play the Super Bowl on their home field. --76.182.148.91 (talk) 04:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It's still "extraordinary within something ordinary." It's a team that will participate in a championship "at home". But the impact remains in the city where the team is from and little else. I must also say that the international interest in the Super Bowl is not as much as you think / want. It is known, it is talked about because it's "American culture", but the follow-up is focused on the United States. I still think that it does'nt have site in Current Events, but I will not delete it again because I don't want to enter an "edit war". It would be interesting that before publishing anything related to the Super Bowl (and the United States in general) you reflect on whether it really can be important for the Portal because, obviously, not everything is. A greeting. Alsoriano97 (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Just one more month left of Women in Red's Women in Africa contest
Thanks for signing up to Women in Red's Women in Africa contest. An update, now that we're two months in: over 100 articles have been created in January and February! Please help make the final month of the contest a success too :) Dsp13 (talk) 14:36, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Matt Gaetz
Hi Alsoriano97, I wouldn’t consider the news regarding Matt Gaetz being investigated by the Ethnics Committee as “domestic”. There is no doubt that if Gaetz is guilty, it would be added. The news about the Ethnics Committee investigating Matt Gaetz isn’t only being reported by American news networks, it is also being reported by sources in other countries such as Al Jazeera, Reuters, Toronto Star, and The Guardian. If Gaetz is guilty and if he resigns, that is notable. I think this investigation is also a notable event. —162.155.203.186 (talk) 22:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

It’s not necessary for you to put every step taken on the subject because it is a strictly domestic matter, of a representative only known and important in one country and because this House committee is not even known outside the United States. So I would delete it again if it’s necessary. Would you see it logical to have a commission of the French National Assembly investigate (nothing conclusive, I insist) a deputy...? I certainly do not see it. Put it in 2021 in the U.S., which exists for these things. That it is reported by newspapers in other countries does not mean that the matter ceases to be domestic. Alsoriano97 (talk) 02:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Esteban Yáñez
Hello, Alsoriano97,

Thank you for creating Esteban Yáñez.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Additional references will help."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 00:07, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josep Mussons (April 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Josep Mussons and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Josep Mussons, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Josep_Mussons Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Josep_Mussons reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

RFC Notice
This is a friendly editor notice that an RFC has begun about an "Wait" !Vote for In the news/Candidates. You can see the discussion by clicking here. Elijahandskip (talk) 13:10, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Deaths form the COVID-19 pandemic in Andorra has been nominated for renaming
Category:Deaths form the COVID-19 pandemic in Andorra has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DemonStalker (talk) 15:17, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

GuzzyG
Hi there, so given that on the Talk:2021 page GuzzyG's personal attacks did partially extend to yourself as well ("it's how it is on these lists normally, like a little fiefdom. It's three editors with a misguided notion on how figures are actually important"; "They're a self defeating bunch"), I thought I'd let you know that I've went ahead and reported him to ANI, as you can see here. Feel free to contribute, if you would like to. --Thescrubbythug (talk) 16:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me known and for reporting him/her, now I'll take a look at it. My apologises, but until June I will be less active in Wiki (I have an state exam on 5th), this is why I have been somewhat disconnected from the discussion in Talk and have not participated yet. But I'm pretty agree with your proposes and what are you defending. Regards. Alsoriano97 (talk) 18:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josep Mussons has been accepted
 Josep Mussons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Josep_Mussons help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Andre de Witte
You have listed the cause of death as septic shock and infectious cellulite. However, cellulite is not normally a serious condition, whereas cellulitis (which is a similar word) is. As I don't speak Portuguese, I'm wondering if it was confused in translation. Editrite! (talk) 10:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's clearly cellulitis not cellulite. Thanks for reporting. Alsoriano97 (talk) 10:48, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2021
Hello, I'm 36.65.44.100. I noticed that in this edit to Portal:Current events/2021 May 12, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''In addition, please don't marking any international significant coverage about the U.S. as "domestic" because some of the article had significant notability. You are non-US and non-English user that doesn't have much coverage about America in your country/region (Spain/Catalonia). If you still disagree, you can asked in the current events talk page. Thank you.'' 36.65.44.100 (talk) 01:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I'am very sure that your message is made with good intentions, but I think you're wrong. "Domestic" means what it's and it's perfectly understandable what I mean and it wasn't a mistake. The fact that I am not American and don't speak English natively means absolutely nothing. In my country and in my region, the news talks about the United States, about what happens there, about what's important, what's not and what's interesting, as it happens with any other state in the world. I get informed about news from many countries in the world through newspapers from other countries, so I believe and I see myself with the ability, like so many other users, to judge when something should be in Current Events, rightly or wrongly, but always open to the necessary debate, from which I learn. I will continue to consider that the news about Cheney is irrelevant, but as I said at the time, the fact that it has international coverage is not always synonymous that it's important and not because it happens in the United States it should have an international impact. May be an important political issue in that country, but the figures involved in it are not known outside the country, nor is it something extraordinary and unexpected. Out of decorum in Wikipedia I will not enter into an editing war, but in no way, in this occasion (in others perhaps yes) you are right and the argument you use is very dangerous because it would lead that this Portal would be filled with information that would distort the reason for which it exists. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 10:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You have reverted multiple editors more than three times within 24 hours on Portal:Current events/2021 May 12, breaking the three-revert rule (3RR), and are now engaged in an edit war. Please stop your disruptvive editing on the portal or I will be forced to open a complaint against you. GWA88 (talk) 13:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Okey. Now, can you read what I exposed above? Greetings. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 13:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Notice about a new WikiProject Proposal
This is a friendly notice about a proposal to have yearly based WikiProjects. You can find the proposal by clicking here. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * My Apologies . I "jumped the gun" in the fact that I forgot to actually make the proposal official.  I have done that now, so feel free to leave your opinion on the actually proposal. (See: WikiProject Council/Proposals/2021). Elijahandskip (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Armenian parliamentary election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Mike Gravel
Thought I’d message you directly since I deleted the importance tag you stuck there; I think he should be included for a few reasons:

1. He was a political outsider who spoke out against the corrupt interventionist policies of America in a time where few others dared to do so (the 1970s on).

2. He was responsible for reading the Watergate Papers into the record of the US Senate, thus making them accessible to the public in general.

3. He was the only campaigning politician in US history to have teenagers run his political campaign (his presidential campaign of 2020).

If you deem these reasons insufficient, I will personally delete his name from the article.

Thanks for your time. PeaceInOurTime2021 (talk) 19:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking your time to justify why he should be in 2021. The only point of the ones you mention that seems relevant to me is 2, but even then it's not a big figure in that scandal either, not transcendent either. He's a very important figure in the US, I don't deny that, but I don't think he has an impact on the history of the country, as well as globally. That is why I am opposed to him being there. But well, if you want to open the debate here to see what other users think it would be great. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mila Ximénez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Mundo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Raffaella Carrà
If you can't be bothered to join the discussion, don't revert the changes which are already supported by three editors and opposed by none. Deb (talk) 17:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


 * First, change "If you can't be bothered to join the discussion" to "If you really can't join the discussion because you don't have too much time to do so for X causes". Thanks. Second, that one user advocates the inclusion of DMX and another user that of Peacock, Harareet, Roberts, Valentine and Ritter doesn't mean, in any way, that they're giving you full support in having the others deleted. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 17:24, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Of course it does. Deb (talk) 17:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)-->

August Editathons at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for August 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deaths in 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MEP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi there...
Saw your post at ITN/C, took a look at your user page. Interesting. You seem a highly motivated person of many interests. One thought: You might consider removing the NSDAP symbol with the swastika from your page. I realize there's no hint of your endorsing Nazism, but every time I see a Hakenkreuz I cringe: The most hated and hateful symbol in modern history. Just a thought. It's your page and its contents are entirely up to you. All the best. – Sca (talk) 22:17, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello ! Thank you for your words. Even if it's my page, if a colleague gives "cringe" something that is in, I will have no problem to delete it, especially if they ask me so politely! Stay safe. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 17:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Good move. Not that it was really crucial, but your page looks better – cleaner – without it. – Sca (talk) 17:48, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * PS: Nice to see you active at ITN/C. We need more women to participate there. – Sca (talk) 14:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello again! I'm quite unoccupied so I spend my time on Wiki. I have to say I'm a man, but very committed to the feminist cause ;) and you're right, there should be more women users! Have a nice day! _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 15:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Oops! Sorry. Old saying in the news business: "Never assume anything." Anyway, it's always good to have new people at ITN/C. – Sca (talk) 16:00, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Eleni Mylona Chatzimichael for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eleni Mylona Chatzimichael is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eleni Mylona Chatzimichael until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -The Gnome (talk) 11:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mikis Theodorakis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Academy of Athens.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
 * I guess you must know that this same thing could be done against you. But you have been quicker. Let's go, then. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 19:10, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Emiliano Aguirre
 * added links pointing to Darwin, COPE, El Mundo, Ferrol and Dialnet

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for 2021 Cumbre Vieja volcanic eruption
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francisco Frutos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Left.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Siluyan (Kilin)
<!--:This is ridiculous. Your authoritarian ways are not at all appropriate on Wikipedia, my friend. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Three people (including I) feel that this story is of significance. There's nothing authoritarian about wanting to post an entry that multiple users, two of whom have an extensive history of making meaningful contributions to the portal, want. If anything, you're the one being authoritarian by being the only person who keeps reverting it because of your own biases. So just stop. Mount Patagonia (talk) 21:16, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Just because three people do something doesn't mean it's the right thing to do (history has shown us that too many times), in fact there is no policy or rule on Wikipedia that supports it. And if there is I would be happy for you to point it out. If all three of you are Americans it's obvious that you would make the edits you've made (country-centrisms in Wikipedia have no place either, mind you). I also tell you, how little you know my edits to call me authoritarian, you might even be pleasantly surprised. But heck, I don't have time to fight over whether someone has signed something. Said that, have a nice day. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The three-revert rule says otherwise. Your comments here about "authoritarian edits" and "country-centrisms" are also massively hypocritical, given you had no problems fragrantly accusing me of authoritarianism despite my edit history showing otherwise, and you frequently post Catalonia-centric stories despite it merely being a Spanish province. I will just leave it at this for now. Mount Patagonia (talk) 21:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) 3RR is about "three reversals", at no time does it say that more than two different users have to be involved. 2) Catalonia-centrism? Jesus Christ! When? How? Since when? Please...Don't make me laugh. Are you talking about those judicial news related to politicians with important responsibilities accused/convicted for crimes of sedition and/or disobedience in the framework of the famous constitutional crisis that was experienced in 2017 caused by a unilateral declaration of independence of that region you mention and that all the governments of the world condemned it? And that very often newspapers (even American) talk about them? Saving the distances with the assault on the Capitol, it is obvious that I respect, have respected and will respect when news concerning the indictment or conviction of rioters who are politicians or other important personalities are published (you can check it with the news of Steve Bannon a few days ago). 3) You act in an "American-centrism" way when you insist on giving importance to a news that is not only a simple formal act, but that only concerns the USA and that's the result of the ordinary functioning of the federal administration. And you would probably delete it if it happened in another country (and so it should be). PS: Catalonia is not a province, it's an Autonomous Community formed by four provinces. End of the discussion. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)-->

Disambiguation link notification for November 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Almudena Grandes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages El Mundo, Barron's and UGT.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Communism is great!
Communism is great! 2607:FB91:186:47A:873E:9046:8E94:9D (talk) 19:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Sombrero barnstar
thank you KittenKlub! _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vicente Fernández, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Comercio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you are resident in the United States)
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 18:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karolos Papoulias, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Dawn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Exclusion of Harry Reid from 2021 Deaths List
Alsoriano97, it doesn't make sense that you deleted Harry Reid because he is a "domestic politician" on the 2021 page. The page has many other American (and non-American) politicians on the list, and the Senate Majority Leader is not just your average "politician." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Idomnimedia (talk • contribs) 06:20, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Alsoriano was absolutely correct in not including Harry Reid, as Reid was a purely domestic politician and Senate Majority Leader is a purely domestic political position. We have a political figures criteria in place, and to include figures like Reid when their international counterparts would hardly ever be considered would be blatant Americentrism and would constitute a major breach in terms of the standards for who we include r.e. political figures. American political figures - including those who served in such positions as Senate Majority Leader - are not automatically entitled to be included on an international page list just because they happen to be American, and rightly so. Why then, do we have 2021 deaths in the United States? The other American political figures included in 2021 (and there are already more American political figures included in the 2021 page than those from any other country, as it is) were figures of international consequence, such as George Shultz, Donald Rumsfeld and Colin Powell. TheScrubby (talk) 07:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Personal comments at ITNC
Will you please not make personal comments of that nature at WP:ITNC? User:力 (powera, π,  ν ) 01:55, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Come on… _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 02:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

NYC Mandate
Hi Alsoriano97, I understand that the Portal:Current events page is not a American newspaper. However, there are some American events that can be included here. I think the news regarding the vaccine mandate lifting in New York City is notable. A big reason why is because of Kyrie Irving. I re-added it but I also changed the source to Reuters because Reuters also covers it as well. I strongly urge you not to remove this because you don't want to risk entering a edit war and nor do I. The event was included in 2022 in the United States but it would also be notable for the current events page. I understand that several American stuff belongs in that page, but there are some stuff that can be included here. A major thing about COVID-19 in the U.S. can be included, and the NYC vaccine mandate is one example of something that can be included here. The NYC vaccine mandate removal was covered by France 24 (which directly mentions Kyrie Irving), Reuters, and CBC. I won't include everything about the U.S. in the events page because I would only include events that are notable. The NYC mandate removal is one notable thing that can be added here. --2600:387:F:4216:0:0:0:6 (talk) 05:29, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your revert about Dwayne Haskins
Hi Alsoriano97, I noticed that you reverted a edit about Dwayne Haskins. The reason why I added this to the Portal:Current events/2022 April 9 page was because Haskins was killed in a vehicle accident off of Interstate 595. I am aware that the Portal:Current events page is not a American news source, but there are some American events that are notable there. I think that the Haskins accident is notable. Some sources outside of America covers the accident such as Reuters, (France 24), CBC, Times of India, The Guardian, and BBC. On January 8, 2022, two Egypt buses collided and it was included into that Current events page. I think this is notable too. I am aware that we usually don't post celebrity deaths on that page unless it has a impact. In the case of Haskins, it does impact their quarterback situation as they already face questions about it even with the Trubisky signing. I think that it is notable to include this accident and I urge you not to risk any edit wars. --96.28.84.250 (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You admit that Portal Current Events is not an American newspaper but you still act as if it is. Can you simply follow the rule of "Do not list the ordinary deaths of prominent persons here. That's what recent deaths is for. Exceptions to this rule are made for prominent persons who died in office (such as Pope John Paul II and Omar Bongo) or other instances where the death in itself has a major impact."? Like everyone else does? This is exhausting. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I only add American stuff if it is considered notable (ex: COVID-19, Response to Ukraine, wildfires, etc.) and if other news sources cover that news. As I mentioned, the January 8, 2022 events page has the accident in which two Egypt buses collided and killing or injuring civilians. The Haskins story is covered by The Guardian, Reuters, CBC, Times of India, The Guardian, and BBC, which is a reason why I added it to the Portal:Current events/2022 April 9 page. The death of Haskins isn't as impactful as Betty White but it has a impact on the Steelers quarterback situation. Recently, I added that Saudi Arabia will lift the restrictions on the Hajj for 1 million people so therefore I don't treat the Portal:Current events page as a American newspaper. If I see any events from other countries that are notable, I would include it. 96.28.84.250 (talk) 23:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You should know that international coverage ≠ international notability. Everyone knows that.And yes, you keep including news related to the US that have no significance simply because they happen in the US (Haskin's death, lifting of covid measures for a specific group of people, of a specific sport, of a specific city). Let it be clear that if you add news related to the USA and I don't remove them (the vast majority) is because I consider that have the level of notability that this Portal deserves. BTW, is so hard to understand the rule Do not list the ordinary deaths of prominent persons here. That's what recent deaths is for. Exceptions to this rule are made for prominent persons who died in office (such as Pope John Paul II and Omar Bongo) or other instances where the death in itself has a major impact. that all of us users are following? We are not going to make an exception for a player with no international recognition or popularity, from a team with no international relevance in a sport mostly popular in one country. I'll stop debating obvious things like this. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 23:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * As I've said, the Haskins news is covered by The Guardian, BBC, France 24, CBC, Reuters, and Times of India, sources outside of America. I included Haskins in 2022 in the United States and on the I-595 page. I know the rules and I know what is notable and what is not notable. If the Egypt bus accident is notable for January 8, 2022 (it is), than I think the same applies to the Haskins accident. These sources mention Dwayne Haskins and cover the accident. 96.28.84.250 (talk) 00:06, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * When I say international coverage ≠ international notability, means international coverage ≠ international notability. That means that international coverage ≠ international notability. And I hope, I just hope, that you are not comparing an accident with 16 DEATHS with a collision of a vehicle with a train (which IS HABITUAL) that has caused the death of ONE PERSON. I really hope you are pulling my leg and this is a joke. If more people had died, including Haskins, I would understand. But stop. It's being ridiculous and you're acting vandalistic. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Artemi Panarin
The event about Artemi Panarin is indeed notable. This isn't just an American event, this is an event that shows an example of the human rights abuse under Putin. I included the event in the Komsomolskaya Pravda page, 2021 in Russia, and 2021 in the United States. For the 2021 in Russia page, I used the Moscow Times because it does cover the incident. The event is notable for the Portal:Current events/2022 February 22 page because it is a example of the human rights abuse under Putin. It is covered internationally. Krystsina Tsimanouskaya was included in Current events pages and I think Panarin should as well. I don't think you shouldn remove it. --96.28.84.250 (talk) 21:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * He's not notable outside USA, this case is not notable outside USA and his decision is not notable outside USA. Easy. International coverage ≠ international notability. Not everything you include in 2021 in the United States should be included in Current Events. I proceed to delete it again. It makes no sense after all I've said. I repeat, decisions made by NHL players have no place in Current Events because it's neither a popular sport outside the United States nor does it have any effect beyond a very specific sport in a specific country. Do not include it again. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 14:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * He's notable in Russia because that Russian tabloid published these allegations. I included it in 2021 in Russia for a reason. He isn't just notable in the United States and I'm aware of what's notable and what's not notable. When it comes to Panarin, it is notable because the Russia tabloid was the one that leaked these allegations against him. What I included isn't just about the NHL, but I included that the tabloid mentioning that a former KHL coach accused him of sexual assault. Here is the tabloid link that caused Panarin to take a leave absence. There's a reason why I not only included the story in 2021 in the United States but also 2021 in Russia. These allegations were also made because Panarin supported Navalny and criticized Putin.
 * The Panarin story is like the story about Belarusian Olympian Krystsina Tsimanouskaya because both risked themselves when they criticized their respective countries. When Krystsina Tsimanouskaya criticized Belarusian Olympic officials for entering her in the 4x400 relay, they removed her. When Panarin defended Navalny, he took a leave. Even though both stories are a little different, this is also how both stories are similar. Both athletes risked themselves. 96.28.84.250 (talk) 21:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging