User talk:Aseleste/Archives/Talk/2021/03

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * (archive delay) ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 08:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

A goat for you!
Thank you for creating my suggested template! It was sitting there as a request for over a month and I'm overjoyed that you came to my rescue.

Painting17 (talk) 17:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 
 * , thanks! ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 05:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Why?
Hi. Can you explain why? Thanks. --2603:7000:2143:8500:B497:77CC:E598:1AB7 (talk) 20:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I try not to undo edits if unnecessary, but in this case, I see this edit, so I thought the undo might have a good reason. It looks like the reason is that from the cited source, he can only be described as a journalist.  As wp:original research is not allowed, the edit was undone.
 * Perhaps you should try to explain why blogger should be added in more details in the edit summary. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 04:58, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you should try to explain why blogger should be added in more details in the edit summary. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 04:58, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Aseleste. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed,Rosguill talk 03:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed
Hello, Aseleste

Thank you for creating CB5.

User:Aseleste, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 09:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Tripurari
Tripurari is a famous writer he is not Tripurari Swami both are different person. Aryansharmaa987 (talk) 10:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I know, but the article is not in a good shape. It can be moved back if the article is at least readable. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 10:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. From the next time,I will take care of it and never make this type of mistake. Aryansharmaa987 (talk) 14:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , it's fine. You can ask for help at the Teahouse on how to write an article properly.  Alternatively, you can click on Special:Random and get a feeling on how pages should be written.
 * I have just added some WikiProjects to your draft. This way, there might be random people trying to help you clean up as well. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 14:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I have just added some WikiProjects to your draft. This way, there might be random people trying to help you clean up as well. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 14:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

A thank you
Hello! So I saw that you are a new page reviewer! I feel like you guys don't ever get thank you's and you get more "I hate you's". So I wanted to thank you for your review of Bryan Riser. Elijahandskip (talk) 13:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 14:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Quantum Ontology
You had said that the Quantum Ontology page was considered fringe, does this mean that no matter what it can not be put up as an article or does it require something more, or how can I go about dealing with that?

Thank you for your time. Lily — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlacklilyofKoN (talk • contribs) 20:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I think you have found the wrong person.  and  are the ones who have reverted your changes.
 * But anyway, I can still try to answer this question. Fringe theories are suitable if it meets WP:FRINGE.
 * From your draft, it looks like it is considered fringe because there is only one source. If this is real, there should be more reliable and secondary sources that significantly covers the subject.  And if this is fringe, then there should still be more reliable secondary sources with additional requirements from WP:FRINGE. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 02:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * From your draft, it looks like it is considered fringe because there is only one source. If this is real, there should be more reliable and secondary sources that significantly covers the subject.  And if this is fringe, then there should still be more reliable secondary sources with additional requirements from WP:FRINGE. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 02:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * From your draft, it looks like it is considered fringe because there is only one source. If this is real, there should be more reliable and secondary sources that significantly covers the subject.  And if this is fringe, then there should still be more reliable secondary sources with additional requirements from WP:FRINGE. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 02:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Testing Template:No ping wikilink
Example ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 04:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Trouted
You have been trouted for YOUR REASON HERE 86.17.210.97 (talk) 17:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC) you sent me a message saying I edited something I did not.
 * Your IP may be shared. I suggest looking at {{subst:Shared IP advice}}.  Quoted,   ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 11:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of my page
I have been notified that you have deemed my page Dune Gaming innapropriate could you please explain why so i can make changes or delete the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by QWERTY159056 (talk • contribs) 13:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * the article in question does not have any statement that are significant. You can think of it whether it is common.  For example, having a YouTube is not significant as anyone can create it, so it is common.
 * You might be misunderstanding what Wikipedia is, namely, it is not an indiscriminate repository of information, so please do not write about YouTube channels with only a few subscribers and alike.
 * Instead, you should consider improving existing articles, which is a lot easier than creating new articles. Also refer to the task center if you wish.  Hopefully this helps. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 13:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Instead, you should consider improving existing articles, which is a lot easier than creating new articles. Also refer to the task center if you wish.  Hopefully this helps. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 13:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Instead, you should consider improving existing articles, which is a lot easier than creating new articles. Also refer to the task center if you wish.  Hopefully this helps. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 13:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok thank you could you please delete the page and thank you for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by QWERTY159056 (talk • contribs) 13:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, Dune Gaming will be deleted shortly by an administrator. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 14:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Request on 15:55:12, 9 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by ToibBaba
hi please publish chakoora pulwama page, I shall highly thankful to you

User:ToibBaba&#124;ToibBaba&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;User talk:ToibBaba&#124;talk&#93;&#93;). (talk) 15:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirecting this section into the section below... ~ Aseleste charge-paritytime 19:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion review for Xanadu Quantum Technologies
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Xanadu Quantum Technologies. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. JamesHunton (talk) 16:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The discussion in question is Articles for deletion/Xanadu Quantum Technologies, which I did not close...
 * I think this is supposed to notify me of the discussion. ~ Aseleste charge-paritytime 19:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Aseleste, Yes I wanted to notify you that the Xanadu Quantum Technologies page is in the Deletion Review page. It would be great if you could join the discussion and provide your perspective as you were the editor to approve the page. Thank you! JamesHunton (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Aseleste, Yes I wanted to notify you that the Xanadu Quantum Technologies page is in the Deletion Review page. It would be great if you could join the discussion and provide your perspective as you were the editor to approve the page. Thank you! JamesHunton (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Redirect Creation
Thank you for your recent creation of my requested redirect. I wanted to create the page myself as you suggested I do, however I couldn't figure out how and was lead to the AfC:Redirect Requests page. Could you point me to a guide of how to create redirects? Thank you. Augu❤Maugu 💕 00:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You can create a redirect by creating an new page with the following content:
 * #REDIRECT page to be redirected to
 * Alternatively, you can use this script to create and categorize redirects, which is easier. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 01:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! ❤  Augu❤Maugu 💕 03:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Herb Alpert Coney Island.jpg
Thanks for the friendly reminder regarding uploading of jpgs to drafts. I understand. Johnwellsking (talk) 15:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, no problem. ~ Aseleste charge-paritytime 19:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Las Tunas (city)
As implementing the linked RM was objected at WP:RM/TR by Dicklyon, your closure is shown to premature and might need to be reverted. Perhaps, it might even need a move review.

Permalink: Contested WP:RM/TR request GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

January 2021 GOCE Drive bling
(delay archiving) ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 11:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * (archive delay) ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 08:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * (indefinite procrastination) ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 11:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sir
Iam new user, I have created a page "chakoora pulwama" My first page, please please punish it, I shall highly thankful to you 🙏🙏🙏 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ToibBaba (talk • contribs) 15:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, but I cannot publish the page since Draft:Chakoora Pulwama is still problematic:
 * Apart from the info box, the prose only contains simple listings, which is what Wikipedia is not.
 * Most sources provided are not wp:reliable sources. As.a result, notability cannot be demonstrated yet.
 * I suggest clicking on the links above and reading them carefully.
 * If you decide that writing articles are too hard, there are still ways to contribute to Wikipedia. See the task center. ~  Aseleste charge-paritytime 20:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you decide that writing articles are too hard, there are still ways to contribute to Wikipedia. See the task center. ~  Aseleste charge-paritytime 20:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Sir, how can i remove all problems from it. Sir plz suggest me some tips. User:ToibBaba&#124;ToibBaba&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;User talk:ToibBaba&#124;talk&#93;&#93;). (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * @ToibBaba: Sorry, forgot about this. There are some problems that you cannot remove like notability.  I would suggest working on simpler things first to understand how articles should be written. ~  Aseleste charge-paritytime 06:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Unnamed
Thanks Topgof (talk) 10:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Ping question
Out of curiosity, how did you know your first ping failed when repinging here? -2pou (talk) 14:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * On Special:Preferences, there is a notification option for "successful mention". If you mention someone successfully, you will receive a notification that says "Your mention of Example was sent."  In that instance, I had not received such a notification, so I knew the ping failed. ~  Aseleste charge-paritytime 14:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Good to know. Thanks! -2pou (talk) 15:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Move review for Las Tunas (city)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Las Tunas (city). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Editor Aseleste, if you are willing to revert your closure and relist the move request, we can do a procedural close of this move review. Whatever you decide is okay with me. No telling how much time will be wasted, though, if the MRV is allowed to continue. Thank you for your consideration and your help with RM closes!  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 04:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, I am happy to revert my closure after Dicklyon has made his objection clear with Special:Diff/1011771326. It has been done here already.  ~  Aseleste charge-paritytime 04:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reverting and relisting! Dicklyon (talk) 05:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Can you correct the "Arms suppliers" section in Karabagh war?
"Arms suppliers" section on the page is uncommon is giving wrong impression. There's discussion on the talk page, I'll copy it here. One user says it's worthy of discussion during the war. This isn't in the article, but right hand side box, and only lists a single country. And also war is over. I am in favor of deletion of that section, since we can't list all the countries which Azerbaijan bought weapons from in the box. I copied the discussion below:

88.230.169.99 (talk) 15:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Amendment: I have reformatted your message to make it look nicer. Will reply soon.  ~  Aseleste  (t, e | c, l) 05:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Merging this discussion into Talk:2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war/Archive 20. ~ Aseleste  (t, e | c, l) 07:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello
I have found out what you mean, but I do not know how to do what you’re asking me to do TheGs2007 (talk) 02:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Consider discussing here (permanent link) to centralize discussion. ~ Aseleste  (t, c, l) 02:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Why, thanks! Face-smile.svg ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 14:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

draft merged
i merged them Draft:Mostafa Salehi 5.219.64.60 (talk) 12:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Alright, I have just cleaned up the draft redirect and created Mostafa Salehi as a redirect to the same section.
 * Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 13:29, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Removal of tag on Potential Tropical Cyclone Ten
I removed the paraphrasing tag you placed on Potential Tropical Cyclone Ten since that report copied the 2017 Atlantic hurricane season article almost word for word. Noah Talk 14:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * @Hurricane Noah: Ah, thanks. I was wondering about this.  It looks like you are right from page comparison (not actually a PDF; looks like the tool is slow at the time of posting). ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 14:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Edward Hewitt Nichols
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

A new draft
Hi there! I created the draft article Draft:Isaac Saul a few months back, and based on your interests, it seemed like something you might be interested in reviewing if you had time. Thank you! Kokopelli7309 (talk) 14:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting wait.svg Pending ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 12:36, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi – thank you so much for looking over the draft! I thought it would be worth trying one more time to publish this as its own article, since I found several new examples of coverage of him on the internet and added them to the article. At the moment, I know that I've kind of "diluted" the citations with a lot of primary references (and I'm happy to take any of these out if you want, by the way), but I feel like there are also several references which do represent independent secondary sources which focused on Saul in particular: Overall, it seems to me like Saul's notability doesn't really come from Ultimate, so it feels strange to make him a redirect for that. The thing that originally made me feel he deserved an article was his thread during the 2020 election, which went viral and got covered by quite a few high-profile newspapers. With the extra citations that I found, do you think that that is enough justification for the article to be published? If not (since this is my first article), I'm curious to know how many third-party citations you normally need before an article like this becomes notable.

Thank you!

Kokopelli7309 (talk) 15:40, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Page curation, a banned user, and outdated information
I've not used the page curation tool, and am not familiar with its settings or how much control users have over it. But I thought you'd like to know that you notified a user banned in 2011 that the article they wrote could do with additional references. They created it as a redirect. Nine and a half years later, it was turned into an article by, who's far more likely to take an interest in adding references. If this is something you can prevent, or check before posting, you might wish to. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 10:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * @BlackcurrantTea: Hi. It is something that I can manually check, but the page curation tool only allows specifying the creator of the article.  I would had replied earlier had I not forgotten this temporarily. ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 14:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I see. I imagine articles created as redirects or by (more recently) banned users show up in the new pages feed now and then, but the combination, especially with a user who'd been banned for so long, must be rare. No worries on taking your time to respond; this wasn't urgent. Happy editing! BlackcurrantTea (talk) 05:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

feedzai
Hi! I got a notification that the draft of Feedzai was reviewed. I know I am watching that draft since I ran it through an AFD just last week. But wondering how a draft can be reviewed? Thanks, Vikram Vincent 12:29, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * @Vincentvikram: I think patrolling can be done outside of main namespace, but usually it is unnecessary. ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 12:34, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * hola! I thought when a page is reviewed it becomes visible to a search engine and hence my msg.. Vikram Vincent 12:47, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Also can you please unreview this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedzai Vikram Vincent 12:48, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * @Vincentvikram: Actually, reviewing does not affect search engine indexing per Controlling search engine indexing if the page is not on the main namespace.
 * The page you have linked to does not exist anymore and cannot be unreviewed. I am assuming you mean the draft page.  However, this does not matter because the draft page will become unreviewed if moved to main namespace again. ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 12:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)