User talk:Crisco 1492/Archive 13

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 03:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: Signpost e-mail
I will gladly do an interview for the Signpost. I will try to send you my answers this evening, but it will probably not be until later. I will not be home until around 9 PM local (currently 7 AM) and could answer your questions at that time. I hope that this is sufficient; I do not know what type of deadline you are on. &mdash; KV5  •  Talk  •  12:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks a lot! Fingers crossed... Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Nicholas
On the Bob Nicholas nomination, the nominator has not edited since December 14 and the hook is dull like another editor said. I reviewed the article and it is fine, but I posted a new hook suggestion because of the uninteresting hook. I was wondering if you could take a look. SL93 (talk) 21:44, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Wilopo
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * PS: If I left someone out by accident, feel free to give one to them, too. Res Mar 05:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh my! You seem to have gotten a lot of accolades lately ;) Res Mar 05:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, a couple. Thanks a lot! Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Wongsonegoro
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Wirjono Prodjodikoro
Hello! Your submission of Wirjono Prodjodikoro at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Eisfbnore talk 20:34, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Khalifah (film)
Hello! Your submission of Khalifah (film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Melly Goeslaw
The article Melly Goeslaw you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Melly Goeslaw for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:50, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Crime victims by nationality
Please note that the subcategories of Category:Crime victims by nationality are up for renaming again. Given that you participated in the previous discussion, you may be interested in participating in this on, too. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:06, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Moeljatno
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Madonna's perfume
In my mind, this rationale is mostly good: it's a rationale for using the design of the bottle in the way that one would use a logo (or the way one would use an album cover, book cover, etc.) — the non-free copyrighted image is used as the primary method of identification. The problem that leads me to tag it for replaceability is that this bottle's design is so simple that someone could take a picture and legitimately release the picture into the public domain or under a free license. If the bottle had a complex enough pictured design that it couldn't be treated as some form of PD-ineligible, then this would be a 100% valid tag. Nyttend (talk) 01:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * That's precisely what I mean — it's treated as a method of identification because of the gold etching. If it were complicated enough that it didn't qualify for PD-ineligible, then this would be a good rationale; as it is, the only reason it's a bad rationale is that it's simple enough to be photographed freely.  The only problem with the current image is that the photographer's own rights aren't freely licensed or PD; if you're correct and the uploader adds a self-taken photo with a free license, everything will be great.  Images tagged as replaceable get deleted after about two days, so it should be resolved quite soon.  Nyttend (talk) 02:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh. I completely overlooked the fact that it's not yet been released.  In that case, it's really not replaceable until April, so I've removed my own RFU tag.  I now have no reason to believe that the image should be deleted at the present time.  Nyttend (talk) 02:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No, because the primary purpose of having a mascot is not to display a logo. One doesn't really use a mascot image to identify a team in the same way one uses a logo.  Clothing really isn't an issue, anyway; Foundation's counsel some time back offered a legal opinion that we need not worry about costumes in a photo when we consider whether that photo is non-free.  Nyttend (talk) 02:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Cosplay? Nyttend (talk) 02:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Huh, I've never heard the term before; I thought you'd made a typo. I can't offer a solid opinion, since I've never heard of it before.  Nyttend (talk) 02:37, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Sounds good; I'll do the same. I'm in process of constructing a set of lists on my hard drive; you won't see them in my contributions, because I'll not put them online until they're as close to done as I can make them.  Nyttend (talk) 02:48, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Wirjono Prodjodikoro
Orlady (talk) 08:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Tourism in Laos
That article has been around since 2005. There should be some pre-copyvio version to revert to. Rmhermen (talk) 12:48, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Never said it needed to be deleted. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't think I said you did. I was talking about reverting to before the copyvio material was added, instead of templating a page.

Source information needed for File:Amir Hamzah.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Amir Hamzah.jpg. However, the file description needs source information before it's okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:


 * 1) Add a detailed description of who the original author is and where you got it. Please be specific, and include a link to the source if you can.
 * 2) Be sure to save the page.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review of Saman
Hi,

I have completed the review of Saman at Talk:Saman (novel)/GA1. Please check for any copy editing errors I may have made. Very interesting article that opened up the world of Indonesian fiction to me. Best, MathewTownsend (talk) 00:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * p.s. I started a stub from the red link Sastra wangi. MathewTownsend (talk) 00:24, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I added some remaining problems at Talk:Saman (novel)/GA1. MathewTownsend (talk) 15:52, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Take your time. What you added looks good. MathewTownsend (talk) 01:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I think you fixed the problem for the most part. I've commented on two remaining issues at Talk:Saman (novel)/GA1. Best, MathewTownsend (talk) 20:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I fell very bad that I can't express to you what the article needs. Would you mind if I changes some things to how I think it should be, and you can veto my changes? It this point I a pretty familiar with most of the material. Regards, MathewTownsend (talk) 00:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm going to pass Saman. I changed it a little but feel free to change it back. I tried to explain things a little more, like was was meant by "supernatural" but etc. but I'm too tired! Anyway, it's a very interesting article. Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 17:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

1740 Batavia massacre
A massacre that led to a major war is generally something WP:Milhist is interested in ... Do you have any objection if I tag the article for Milhist? Up to you. - Dank (push to talk) 04:47, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Go for it. I figured it was under WP:DEATH as the MILHIST page says that they "don't do massacres" (might be paraphrasing a little...) Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * That's true, but we do causes and consequences of war, and this led to a war. Thanks ... it may take me a little while to get to the copyediting but I'll get there. - Dank (push to talk) 05:02, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I thank thee. Okay, it's tagged as MilHist as well. Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * At the moment, I don't believe copyediting is going to deal with Brian's concerns, but I'll keep an eye on the FAC page and see if something new develops. - Dank (push to talk) 02:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'd suggest that you leave Taksen to it, and we clean up afterwards. For example, if you suspect a certain source may not be reliable, leave it in but raise a query at WP:RS/N. Your caution may be prudent, but he seems a little sensitive, or maybe it's a language barrier issue. I'd like to keep him on side and I think we might need to cut Taksen some breathing space. I have every confidence that we can have a better article with his help. -- Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 17:14, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay OhC. Good idea. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:12, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Sahardjo
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Ucu Agustin
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Source information needed for File:Martha Christina Tiahahu.jpg
Hello, !

It was really helpful of you to upload File:Martha Christina Tiahahu.jpg. However, in order to keep and use new images, we need to know their original source.

If you can edit the description page and add this information, that would be great. If you're not sure how or need help, please ask at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Khalifah (film)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 03:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Started work on rewriting Emaciation
I'm just going to redo it in my sandbox and paste the whole thing over the current article when I get done. Might take me a few weeks, though. I'm gonna try for a 5x DYK.  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  09:28, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Martha Christina Tiahahu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maluku (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK of Ravinder Singh (author)
Hello, Thanks for reviewing. Help me out with the hook. Should I unlink those 2 words ?? -- ɑηsuмaη  ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 02:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Did my best, removed two unreferenced line, and added reference. Should be okay now. Please let me know. Thanks for the ALT. -- ɑηsuмaη  ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 18:00, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Soeprapto (prosecutor)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Titi Sjuman
The DYK project (nominate) 12:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Amir Hamzah
The DYK project (nominate) 20:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Boats
Template:WikiProject Boats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Brad (talk) 23:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Lawang Sewu
Orlady (talk) 20:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Lawang Sewu: Dendam Kuntilanak
Orlady (talk) 20:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I noticed only now, that you were not happy with the wording. Defending my suggestion (it was not more than that, then someone took it): The repeated name is the very name in both articles (I try to stay close if at all possible), is short (enough), can take double emphasis as a foreign name, and needed pictured to be added, which would have been cumbersome within the quote which was complicated enough because of the quote within the quote. Happy New Year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough (and no hard feelings, don't worry). I personally do my best to avoid using too many foreign language names in the hooks... they tend to not do very well, methinks. Happy new year to you too! (Only 3 hours left here). Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Plenty of foreign names in my latest personal memories, but also pictures, if you are interested, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, and I have numerous myself, despite an effort to do occasional hooks that aren't related to Indonesia. Now, if the person's name is Martha Christina Tiahahu (not a bad article btw), that's generally not a big problem. But with a name like Moeljatno... only a Dutch speaker (German too?) or someone familiar with old Indonesian speaker would know how to pronounce it; English doesn't have the oe = U or j = y. Those sorts of articles... not easy. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:22, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Rejection of Special date request
In regards to this recent edit of yours, an existing discussion was already occurring at Wikipedia talk:Did you know. You might wish to comment as your action effectively overrides most of the current dialog. --Allen3 talk 14:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You messaged me just as I was about to comment at WT:DYK. I've already replied there. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:52, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi Crisco,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Extermination of Evil collage.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 4, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-01-04.  howcheng  {chat} 23:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Interesting workaround. I'll take a look. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

FC
Lovely page, well-judged idea. The two graphs are very nicely designed (except that the axis legends are too small to read—I'd double the size of the y-axis text and put the months vertically and double the size ... but that's a lot of work, so no big deal). When I got to "Despite this large increase in featured content", I had to ponder what it meant, since there's no data on last year's promotions; then I realised you meant in terms of the additions to total existing content (again, no feeling for whether it was an 11% increase overall, or what). My feeling is that the rate of promotions, especially of articles and lists, has been going down significantly.

''Feature-lutions"—I stared at it and didn't get it. When I returned to it, I worked it out. It's a bit abstruse, I think. You might consider "Stats for the year" as a reader-attractor, even if it lacks pizzazz.

"the systemic bias pervades every featured content process"—a reader might say, "it is the English WP, so why wouldn't there be an English-language bias". Is the bias even more pronounced for featured content than general content, do you think? Tony  (talk)  05:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I think I still have the table saved, but there is a power outage right now and I don't know how far I'll get with battery power. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Martha Christina Tiahahu
The DYK project (nominate) 06:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/The Singing Office
The article has the basic premise of the show. SL93 (talk) 02:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm glad that I could find this article to create. For a show that received significant coverage in 2007 and 2008 and ended in 2008, it's surprising that the article didn't exist. Better late then never. SL93 (talk) 15:17, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 15:18, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Sastra wangi
The DYK project (nominate) 23:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for nominating Sastra wangi for DYK. My first ever!

Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 23:18, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I take you up on your offer of DYK pointer! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Any idea...
how to progress with Template:Did you know nominations/Monday (The X-Files)? -- Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 02:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I've just posted to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_The_X-Files. -- Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 02:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Support this barnstar! And also the write up in Wikipedia Signpost/2012-01-02/Featured content. Nice to have some analysis. Good work! MathewTownsend (talk) 04:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you both! Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:25, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Second opinion

 * Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Murphy_Complex_Fire. Pls look at this. Close as you see fit. Yea the image is not the best but that's not a reason to not approve the hook. GEEZ! And they wonder why so many people leave wiki. Tks. Pumpkin Sky   talk  10:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Just noticed that you'd already commented there. Thanks for helping. Still needs closed though. Pumpkin Sky  talk  11:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * LoL, I've left a comment there already. It would also work if you just removed the image from the nomination page, then he would have no reason to hold back the tick. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No way. I will not kowtow to this [redacted]. It would also work if he'd not twist something into his own personal view contrary to community standards. I don't care if it never becomes a DYK. Pumpkin Sky   talk  11:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, aside from the comment I redacted. Jez is used to FAC and GAN, which both have completely different cultures than DYK. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * He can kiss my butt. Someone should override his pompous ass. Pumpkin Sky  talk  17:20, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * YES! to Orlady, obviously a gal with common sense Pumpkin Sky   talk  21:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC)