User talk:Escape Artist Swyer

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you have any questions please feel free to ask me

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! &mdash; Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 19:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Adoption
Hello there, Escape Artist Swyer. I'm The Random Editor. I noticed you are interested in being adopted. If that is still the case, I would be glad to. I have close to 2100 edit. So, If you want me to adopt you, leave me a message here. Even if you don't want me to, I'm always up to answering a question. Cheers. --  Random  Say it here! 00:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes I would be glad to adopt you. Add the following onto your userpage . I will give you assingments shortly. --  Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  00:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello there Escape Artist Swyer. Sorry about forgetting to give your assignment. First things first I want you to install WP:POPUPS. To do this go to User:Escape Artist Swyer/monobook.js and add . Save the page and bypass the cache. This will allow you to revert vandalism. Once complete, inform me on my talk page. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  00:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Next, I have a boring, yet important assignment. Read WP:5P, WP:REVERT, WP:WARN, and WP:POPUPS. Inform me when complete. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  20:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Now read WP:VAND and applying what you have learned revert a case of vandalism and warn a user appropriatly. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  02:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep up what you are doing, and have some fun. I will check in now and then, and I will hand out a new assignment in about 4 days. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  19:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Good. You are definitly making progress. Now I want you to read WP:N, and then go to WP:AFD and comment in a deletion discussion. Edit the discussion so your comment looks like *Delete - reason for deletion. --~ . If you have any questions feel free to ask. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  00:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I apologize. I somehow missed the fact that you had already !voted in a afd. Well here is the next assignment. Go to WP:RFA and !vote for a candidate you think is ready for adminship. Leave me the name of the page when you are done. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  20:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I would appreciate it if you would complete your assignment. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  17:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey great work. Sorry if I was a bit snappy. Keep up what you are doing. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  02:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Looking good. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  23:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Smile!


{{{1|--H| H irohisat  {{sup| Talk }} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy editing!

Graduated
Congrats, you have graduated. Feel free to add the following to your userpage. . -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( tαlk ) 22:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Tragic Kingdom
Well, no one has put any more comments on Tragic Kingdom's peer review. I asked WesleyDodds a few days ago, and he never responded (he did respond to other people's messages on his talk page since then.) What should we do now?

Oh, and one more thing. There is a long section of the credits for Boom Box on its Allmusic page, i.e. it lists about 200 names. How many, and/or which ones, should I add or leave out? Tezero (talk) 14:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, here it is. Tezero (talk) 22:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you think it's going to make it? We've done about everything that's been asked, but no one's actively said "support." This would be my first FA if it passed, I'm kind of tense. Tezero (talk) 14:23, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Then is it Raul or SandyGeorgia who decides whether it passes or fails by looking at the discussions? (I'm not asking which one it is, I'm asking is it either one of them, or is it some other way.) Tezero (talk) 22:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's good. Maybe I'll check over to see if there's any standing arguments. Tezero (talk) 22:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Boom Box is hard too, there's almost no reviews or information about it out there. The article's only 13kb and I have no idea how I'm going to get it to a GA. I'm always thinking, this would be so much easier if it was a studio album. But I have to work with what I have...


 * Oh, and I don't have the album ,or even know anyone who does. I actually went to a few record stores recently looking for it (and other things) but none of them had it and I didn't want to go buy it on Amazon.com right away. Ask around here, someone might. Tezero (talk) 22:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nice, I didn't know you could do that. Well, I have a feeling Blagojevich isn't even going to jail, so... Tezero (talk) 00:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I guess we've done everything the FAC said, so all we have to do is wait for Raul or SandyGeorgia to come around. Tezero (talk) 04:12, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Everything in Time
I hope your successful in getting the article to GA, it's been on my watchlist for a few months now—A sockpuppet used to edit it—and I've been watching your work from a distance. Well done. — Realist  2  15:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Tragic Kingdom - featured?
It was not promoted by SandyGeorgia. Why could it have happened? What was there left to do?! I thought we got everything? Tezero (talk) 15:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, I don't speak for Sandy, I merely observed your comment on her talk page. But I think it likely that the article wasn't promoted simply because there were no support votes, and no new comments for ten days. Unfortunately, given the number of active FACs (40+) and a lack of reviewers at present, your article simply didn't attract enough editors to review it properly, and the FAC can be considered to be one of those that unfortunately "stalls" from time to time. Not every editor who leaves comments at a FAC watches the page, so when it comes to renominating the article (it's generally considered good practice to wait a couple of weeks), it might be a good idea to leave messages at the talk pages of those editors whose issues you feel you have resolved, to see if they feel enough work has been done to consider a support. All the best, Steve  T • C 20:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Should we wait for SandyGeorgia to respond? It seems like it was just bad timing that it didn't get promoted, because so many articles were listed at FAC and Tragic Kingdom just didn't get any actual "support" votes. Tezero (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * That's probably the right thing to do, but what do you mean "have to wait"? Tezero (talk) 20:21, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't know if it's a rule, but it's probably a good idea. At any rate, we should try to wait for the number of candidates listed to thin out. Everything in time. Tezero (talk) 15:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, I think right now it's about as good as it'll get. It's been...9 days since it was failed the last time due to there not being enough "support" votes. (And SandyGeorgia still hasn't replied to you.) Should I nominate it again? Oh, and about all the GANs, most of them are "on hold." All I reviewed was With Teeth. Tezero (talk) 18:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: I have an idea
Those sound like good ideas. But since I've only reviewed 5 GANs, it seems like a lot of work to do. I'll do at least a few of em (starting tomorrow; I'm with relatives today) but The Singles, No Doubt, and The Beacon Street Collection got reviewed quickly. We could do it, but yes it would be a lot of work.

P.S. Oh, and what did you mean "hit with a hammer"? The term "WP:HAMMER" sounds familiar... Tezero (talk) 20:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Here you are. I listed it as a joint nomination. Tezero (talk) 14:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Three Little Birds (Connie Talbot song)
Ok, sure, I'll merge at some point soon. Fail it, consider it withdrawn, whatever- it doesn't really matter. Talbot's new album has now been released anyway, so I can easily expand that article to aim for a good/featured topic, which is the reason I was nominating this one in the first place. Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 23:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Tragic Kingdom's FAC
Well, new things keep on coming up. We have one support vote, Dabomb87. There's a little more to do to get WesleyDodds to support it.

Oh, and about the liner notes, there's the usual; lyrics, special thanks, and some photographs. Above and below each photograph is a lyric snippet from the song "Tragic Kingdom". I don't think there's anything from the liner notes that could be added to the article. Tezero (talk) 03:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * What do you mean? It's technically still open; comments can still be made. SandyGeorgia was just impatient. I didn't even get to see that last set of comments before it was "closed." I've responded to them (i.e. corrected the article accordingly) now, but still. Tezero (talk) 22:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, at least each failed FAC is bringing it closer to the best possible status. The comments can't go on forever. Sooner or later it has to pass. I just wish it would sooner. I want my first FA! Tezero (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Boom Box
What do you think there is left that I can do to get Boom Box to GA standard, or at least to expand it a bit? There's those "expand" tags there, but there just seems to be no more material out there. Got any suggestions? Tezero (talk) 04:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

GA Nomination
I have just reviewed Boom Box and placed it on hold because there are a couple issues related to the sources that need to be addressed. Full review details are listed here. Contact me on my talk page when these issues are addressed so I can go ahead and promote the article. // Gbern3 (talk) 19:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Congratulations. Boom Box has been promoted. You responded very quickly. Thank you for fixing those issues I brought up. I reread the article before promoting it and I have a couple suggestions:
 * The album spawned four singles—"New", the soundtrack to the movie Go; "Ex-Girlfriend"; "Simple Kind of Life"; and "Bathwater".
 * Suggestion: The album spawned four singles: "New", a song on the soundtrack to the movie Go, "Ex-Girlfriend", "Simple Kind of Life", and "Bathwater". I don't think you need to use semicolons to separate album titles.
 * Later, in April 2003, No Doubt went into hiatus to take a break to spend time with their families before starting to compile Everything in Time; The Singles 1992–2003; The Videos 1992–2003; and Boom Box, containing all of the above and Live in the Tragic Kingdom.
 * Suggestion: In April 2003, No Doubt went into hiatus to take a break to spend time with their families before starting to compile Everything in Time, The Singles 1992–2003, The Videos 1992–2003, Live in the Tragic Kingdom, and Boom Box which contained all of the above. ''I don't think you need to say "Later" at the beginning of the sentence because you've already done a good job of putting everything in the article in chronological order. I also didn't think semicolons were necessary.
 * The Singles 1992–2003 was well received by critics and was described as "a real joy"[18] and a "stellar collection".[19]; its mixture of styles was both praised as "sheer diversity" and criticised as having a "hotch-potch feel".
 * There's a semicolon after ref 19 and criticised should be spelled with a "z" --> criticized. I didn't catch this before.
 * I didn't think these were big enough problems to prevent the article from GA status so I didn't bring them up in the review. Also, I thought it would be more appropriate prevent promotion only if this article was up for peer review or nominated for WP:FA. I encourage you to review some other music related article that's been nominated for GA status. The list for Arts related articles is longer than the list for any other category. What I like to do is read the shorter articles. It's much easier to review and critique and it helps people. // Gbern3 (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

If you do decide to complete a GA review, there are a couple of templates and project pages that you may find helpful.

Hope these help. // Gbern3 (talk) 16:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * GAList or GAList2 templates: I used this for your review. Makes checking off each criterion so much easier. Just copy and paste the code (in the "usage" section) into the article's review page and use the arguments aye (pass), nay (fail), ??? (I don't know), or just leave blank (neutral). You can also use the argument hold to give the nominator time to fix the problem.
 * quick-fail criteria: A list of things that a page MUST NOT have to get GA status. If the article has one of the problems listed, you can fail it without having to read through the article. I did this yesterday for Jay-Z. I was a disappointed because the whole reason why I decided to review the Jay-Z article is because I like him as a rapper and a businessman but this article had a cleanup banner and was protected from editing by anonymous users. So I failed it because those are two things (cleanup banners and edit wars) that can make a article quick-fail. This article also needed much more inline citations and had some grammar errors. I was pissed off too because I discovered on the talk page that the article had already went through a peer review in August and the citations issue was brought up then. I felt like the nominator was wasting my time and everyone else's by nominating it.
 * You can also use the FGAN quick-fail message to tell people on their talk page that you've failed their article. I used it here for the user who nominated Jay-Z.

Re: Apologies for absence
That's totally fine. One thing you should know is that someone put Everything in Time on hold. The review is here. Just try to stop in and help out if you can; I'm working on other stuff now. Tezero (talk) 22:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Good deal. You're right, I never thought of the No Doubt website to look for for interviews; who knows, I might actually find something about Boom Box. Well, see you later, so to speak. Tezero (talk) 03:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Gwen Stefani discography
nominated Gwen Stefani discography for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Do U(knome)? yes...or no 05:21, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Following on from this list's demotion, the Gwen Stefani albums topic now has one featured article and one good article, hence as it doesn't have 2 featured items it's been automatically demoted to a good topic. Furthermore, the topic has gone under retention, i.e. if the list doesn't get refeatured by 18 June, then the topic can be nominated for removal, for having an article not up to standard. Sorry... :/ rst20xx (talk) 17:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Harrison FAC
Thought you'd like to know that this FAC you participated in has been restarted.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 12:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Tragic Kingdom
So, do you think you're up to rewriting the infamous "music" paragraph in Tragic Kingdom? Boom Box isn't too far from GA standard; all it needs is more references in the background section. If we can get TK to pass FAC and BB to pass GAN, the whole thing will be eligible for a featured topic. Tezero (talk) 13:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's okay, but can you tell me what sources you were going to use to expand the paragraph? Tezero (talk) 21:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think it looks good, but just to be safe do you think we should get a copyeditor? Tezero (talk) 16:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It'll take some time. I really don't know what I'll do after this stuff is done, besides nominating it for FT or GT. What's your next project? Tezero (talk) 14:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the work you've done on the FAC. Sorry I haven't been on lately; I won't have much time to be on for a while but today I do. Tezero (talk) 13:31, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * There just wasn't much to say. There weren't really any concerns left from the previous FAC. I don't know if you remember, but if Boom Box is passed, the entire topic is eligible for FT. Tezero (talk) 00:31, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back
Welcome back. Sorry I haven't been on the last few days; my Internet modem burned out and it took a few days to get a new one and have it set up. Tezero (talk) 18:20, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * All the charts seem notable. Why, did that come up in the FLRC? Tezero (talk) 19:54, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Peer review help
Thanks for the info on how to re-format Fearless. I'm new when it comes to correctly formatting Wikipedia articles. I mostly do minor edits such as adding a sentence or two of info, correcting bad information, or correcting typos. I'll definitely have to get to work! Thanks again! Novelwriter65 (talk) 19:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: MissingNo.
To more thoroughly answer your question, when the article was going through peer review, several editors complained that the extent of the background information given on capturing and battling with MissingNo. violated WP:GAMEGUIDE's policy, thus the brief summary in the article. It comes down to a case of trying to appease everyone sadly. I hope this answer is sufficient.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Stefani FLC
That can happen. And I'm sorry if it's disappointing to have to wait another ten days but please do feel free to renominate it immediately and notify those folks who showed an interest last time. Once again, apologies. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay cool. It should fly through by then.  All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 17:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Spice Girls
Hi, I believe we never cross paths before, I see that you are making improvements to the Spice article as well to the discography page, so are you by any chance willing to collaborate with me on the singles and albums articles, I always wanted to find some users to help me, but never found anyone, that is why stopped with "2 Become 1", too much work for me, I believe that we can make the whole group's discography at least good articles, there are only 13 singles and 4 albums and there is a pretty good amount of info available, lots of books about the group. Please let me know what you think about this, perhaps you have other projects alredy. Regards. Frcm1988 (talk) 04:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh I do have some books with information about the group, "Girl Power!", "Spice Power: The Inside Story", "Real Life: Real Spice The Official Story", "Spice Girls" and I use to have Victoria's autobiography "Learning to Fly" but I can't remember where I left it. Also with Google Books you can preview many pages of a lot of books like "Wannabe: How the Spice Girls Reinvented Pop Fame" or "The Billboard Book of Number 1 Hits". And there is no rush, we can start after you finish your current project. Regards. Frcm1988 (talk) 16:54, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, take your time. The Featured Topic could be interesting, some of the song have more info available so I believe it wouldn't be so hard. Regards. Frcm1988 (talk) 10:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Harajuku Lovers Live
Hi.

Indeed the article is big and good, but is definitely a stub for our project for 3 reasons:

1.- Lacks year category, and several more to be GA 2.- There is no authorship for the songs 3.- The personnel section is most likely incomplete, since no producer is mentioned, and the section wasn´t made according to guidelines.

I´ll take care of the las two, but the authorship is fundamental.

Don´t hesitate to call if anything else comes up. Good luck with the GAN. Zidane tribal (talk) 01:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi again. The article is so well referenced that i got no problem rating it a B, good luck with the GAN, i still think it needs more categories, like genre, country and all that. Good work. Zidane tribal (talk) 01:45, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

NLOTH FAC
Hello, I was wondering if you'd be able to check that I've addressed your concerns for the No Line on the Horizon FAC, just for the record? The cause was my copying over a table format per an earlier recommendation and trying to figure out how to work it. For your convenience, the link to the FAC discussion is here. Cheers, MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 01:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom Election RFC courtesy notice
A request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee 2. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies. Manning (talk) 08:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)  You received this message because you participated in the earlier ArbCom secret ballot RFC.

Proposal to raise FT criteria to requiring 50% featured
Hi, there is currently a proposal to raise the percentage of articles featured topics need to have featured to 50%, from 1 September 2010, and as someone with a topic with less than 50% of articles featured, this change if passed will directly affect you. Any input on your part to the discussion, and opinions both for and against the proposal, would be most welcome - rst20xx (talk) 01:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * This passed, so your FT(s) need more articles featured by 1 September 2010, or else they will become GTs - rst20xx (talk) 20:57, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop
As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome. For the Arbitration Committee, Risker (talk) 08:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

GA review of Harajuku
I am reviewing the article Harajuku Lovers Live and have found it to be fallign jsut short of passing teh Good article criteria as there are links that changes domain and dab links. Please change it within the next two days lest the article should fail. --Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 10:09, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Nobel Prize help
Hey! I found you on the "Guild of Copy Editors" page. I am currently working on the Nobel Prize article and I am going to nominate it for a GA soon, hopefully before the end of this week. However, it could need some more grammar/prose checks to make it better. I was wondering if you could give me a hand? Especially the parts after "History" needs some looking into. I would be very grateful for any help :)

Cheers --Esuzu 18:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your answer. Great with more help! Looking forward to see your changes :) --Esuzu 23:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)



Spice Girls
Hi Escape Artist, been a while since the last time that we chat, I have been re-editing "Wannabe" from scratch for the past two weeks in my sandbox, and it is HUGE!!!, there is so much info available. Im still doing the Composition section, and the reception and chart performance sections are missing, but they are the easiest to do. The article would probably need a lot of copyediting. I don't know if you have the time right know, since you are not very active recently, or if you are still interested in the project, so please let me know. Regards. Frcm1988 (talk) 22:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Escape Artist, I have finished the Composition section, and I was gathering reviews for the Critical reception, there are plenty of newspapers and magazines that reviewed the album or the song, the problem is that all of them are from the U.S. Considering that the group is British, the article probably need reviews from the UK or Europe, I tried to find archives from German, Italian, and French newspapers but could find anything. I don't perhaps you have access to British reviews, for now I will finish the Chart performance and put the formats and track listing. Hope you can help me. Regards. Frcm1988 (talk) 08:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, don't worry just leave a message when you are free, I return to the university tomorrow, so probably I will have only a couple of weeks without too much work, but after that I won't be able to edit as much as I used to. I wanted to finish the article before but oh well, it's almost done, and all the info that I have available is already there, perhaps is a bit too long. Regards. Frcm1988 (talk) 00:22, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Cool (Gwen Stefani song)
Hey, thought if I should notify anyone, it'd best be you... Cool (Gwen Stefani song) was demoted from FA yesterday, which means the Love. Angel. Music. Baby. FT can be demoted come June 28 if the article isn't back up to GA - rst20xx (talk) 21:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Grab some glory, and a barnstar
Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

No Doubt albums topic
Hi, we haven't conversed in a while, but I just learned that starting the first day of September, featured topics have to have 50% of the articles featured. We together are responsible for the No Doubt albums topic, and this upcoming policy puts us in somewhat of a predicament. Tezero (talk) 01:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm actually a little busy right now with an FAC, but I'm thinking we should get peer reviews for those two. Tezero (talk) 22:12, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Both at PR now (here and here). Tezero (talk) 20:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Billboard.biz
Do you have a subscription to Billboard.biz? I need to gets references to fix some dead links in Jesus Walks. GamerPro64 (talk) 14:07, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 22:09, 3 August 2010 (UTC).

Spice Girls
Hi Escape, its been a long time since you last edited here, I don't know if you are coming back, hope everything is ok with you. PS. I already finished with some of the group's songs, right now Im doing "Stop", hope you get back one day to help me finish the project. Regards. Frcm1988 (talk) 21:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Heads up about an RfC
Please note that there's a new discussion at Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure in which you may wish to comment. It is expected to close in about a week. You have received this message because you participated in a similar discussion (2009 AC2 RfC) last year. Roger talk 05:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 15:44, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:38, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:36, 2 December 2010 (UTC).

GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Fa-lala-lala
Why don't you nominate the "Christmas Tree" article for GA? You did an awesome job with it anyways. :) — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 10:22, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * You have done a marvellous job dude/girl... Thanks :) — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 05:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 20:01, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

Gwen Stefani
Should we add the "Gwen Stefani" article to the "Gwen Stefani albums" featured topic? It makes sense to do so, since she's the author of those albums and therefore related to the topic. Leptictidium (mt) 08:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:19, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:49, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Featured topic removal candidates/Rock Steady/archive2
Seeing as you are a major contributor to the articles, I am letting you know that I have opened up a GTRC for teh Rock Steady GT. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:43, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:57, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Gwen Stefani Tour
I see you're editing Harajuku Lovers Tour 2005 - and it's quite a good job. You think it can be improved quickly enough to GA status and prevent this from failing? igordebraga ≠ 16:32, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:03, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Userbox
Hello. FYI, I've had a userbox created for me, and I thought it might be of interest since you were involved with the WikiProject Novels/Crime task force. It says "This user reads Hard-boiled detective fiction" and the code to implement it is:. (Add double braces to the red text: ). Pete Best Beatles (talk) 22:10, 22 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, the code seems to have a typo, causing it to appear incorrectly. Here is the fixed code that you can copy and paste.

-- KomradeKalashnikov (talk) 01:17, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Dead Famous (Novel)
I came to the above page on a redirect from "Boris Pecker" but could find nothing about him. I left a query on the talk page in 2020. Please see my note on the talk page for Dead Famous. As no-one has taken up my query I have put in a request for discussion and deletion of the redirect .If there is a connection I would be happy for the redirect to remain if this was explained in the article Spinney Hill (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC) Spinney Hill (talk) 10:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Quatermass (TV serial)
Quatermass (TV serial) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster  (chat!)  08:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)