User talk:Figureskatingfan/archive 9

You are invited to Stanford's WikiProject!
ralphamale (talk) 22:22, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!
SarahStierch (talk) 22:16, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

You're still interested?
I haven't been checking regularly lately, but I had seen a message that said you wanted to delay a little bit. If you're ready, I'll start work on the nomination statement and get it ready for next week. I think you'd be an excellent addition to the admin corps. And I'm very sorry for disappearing.Karanacs (talk) 19:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yah, I wanted to delay it for after the holidays, and then I had to think about it again. Thanks, I appreciate the support and encouragement.  And hey, disappearing is not the problem; not coming back is!  And I'm so glad you came back! ;)  Looking forward to the nom, I think. Christine(talk) 21:42, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I've started the nomination draft: Requests for adminship/Figureskatingfan. Now it's your turn - look over the nomination statement and see if there's anything that sounds off, and then start answering questions.  When you're ready I'll transclude it (no earlier than Monday, though...will be out of town most of the weekend). Yea! Karanacs (talk) 20:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Uh, right. ;) I'll work on it weekend and have it ready by Monday. Thanks. Christine (talk) 22:59, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Your RfA
You have an unstarted RfA. Would you like me to start it for you? It seem everything is set and ready to put out there. —cyberpower (Talk to Me )(Contributions ) 10:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Replies there. :) Amalthea  18:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I posed an extra question regarding your signature. Mind, I have no objections, but I didn't want to leave an oppose hanging out there if the concern could be addressed, one way or the other. Also - Good Luck! UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:46, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Good luck on your RfA... I had actually looked at potentially nominating you back when we worked on the Wiggles together... but you fell off my radar. Now that you are running, I wish you the best.--- Balloonman  Poppa Balloon 05:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
—cyberpower (Talk to Me )(Contributions ) 20:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Signature
First of all, I intend to support your RFA. Anyway, this is just an idea as your signature is being discussed, and as it's early days it might be overlooked in general anyway, but although there would be a couple of small obstacles to overcome, it's not impossible that you could obtain User:Christine. As I say, just an idea for your consideration. WilliamH (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Another option would be to use a signature that captured both the user name and real name. My sig has both Balloonman and Poppa Balloon.  You could have Christine and build in FSF as yuour sig.--- Balloonman  Poppa Balloon 05:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

A reversion you made
Howdy. I was reading your rfa, and saw Wifione's oppose. This revert was mentioned. In that revert, it appears that the spelling of only 2 words were changed. Just to clarify, you thought that you were fixing vandalism?--Rockfang (talk) 07:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Edits from redusernames and IPs are obviously always bad. That's pretty much the approach of the people patrolling recent changes.--81.98.51.7 (talk) 10:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Plus to quote this very editor: In my experience, anonymous IPs are the editors who break WP policy and come here to attack the subjects of BLPs. - She doesn't like anons because some are bad, thus they are all bad. Simple as. We don't need more admins who hate IP users thank you very much.--81.98.51.7 (talk) 10:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The mistaken vandalism reversion weakened my support but to know that this user acts more strongly to redusers and IP's is what will draw me to an oppose. I'm sorry Christine and I'm going to have to oppose your RfA.  Even though I have my opinions and judgements about these editors and they are the first ones I check on my watchlist, I stay neutral and jugde them based on how they edit and how their attitude towards Wikipedia.  An edit like that I would've rolled back using Rollback AGF and not Rollback VANDAL.—cyberpower  (Chat )(WP Edits: 516,879,398 ) 13:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Toot Toot
Re. Pending Changes. Reviewing. Banning IPs will never happen, I don't think, nor should it really need to. Anyway, why I really came here was to wish you the best for the rest of your RFA. I don't like to do what I did there, but it's something I can never stand to see - new or existing editors being upset by incorrect implications of maliciousness, intentionally or not. Your contributions are awesome, and my little girl (8) thinks Sam got a rough deal, too. See you around. Begoon &thinsp; talk 06:47, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * He he, thanks. It's so brutal, and it's only Day 2!  Whew! ;) I'll probably have to clarify; I don't think that IPs should be banned out of hand; just from BLPs, or at least some of them.  Thanks for the kind words, and tell your daughter that she's exceptionally bright. ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 06:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Cool. Alice will be pleased. I'll clarify what I said too. PC protection on request of any contentious BLP. Solved. Done. All you need to be sure of is you get the right Reviewers. Well, ok - not quite that easy, but infinitely preferable to preventing IPs from editing. Just as an example, I know of at least one IP who practically rewrote The Rolling Stones as an IP (he's registered now). There are hundreds of other examples of IP editors who contribute positively - gnoming is a common area. With you all the way on the WBC though... Begoon &thinsp; talk  07:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

My apologies...
I am sorry for how it's turned out. I don't know how you'll take this note; but just wanted to mention out here that I'm sorry for what's going on at the RfA. Regards. Wifione  Message 13:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Ditto, but the good news is that the reason why your RfA is failing isn't personal. It is carelessness/sloppiness while using the tools. In other words, it is something that can be easily fixed and once fixed should make you golden next time you run.  There are some RfA's that when they are over, you walk away thinking, "that person should never run again."  I don't feel that way with you.  The opposes are minor and fixable.  I would suggest letting it run for another day to get a broader perspective on issues and if it doesn't change to withdraw.  You were obstinant enough to go through FAC 5 times with the Wiggles, waiting a few months to rerun should be a piece of cake.--- Balloonman  Poppa Balloon 16:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * ^^ Harry the Dog WOOF 16:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Might I suggest that you stop using Twinkle for a while, and revert edits manually? Yes, it is a bit slower, but it makes you think more about what you are doing, particularly when it comes to adding the warning templates.  The templates, in case you aren't aware, are nicely laid out at WP:MLT and WP:UTN.  Personally, I've never used Twinkle - aside from compatability issues with the browser I use, I have concerns about letting something else do the work for me.


 * Also, when it comes to reverting text, always have in mind the thought that the person who made the edit was doing so for the good of the project. In other words, WP:AGF . If you do that, then you are less likely to have the problems that are hampering your otherwise strong case for adminship.  If you label your edit summary as reverting a good faith edit, then when you drop a note on the editor's talk page and discover they are on a vandalism spree, no one will think any the less of you.  Just add the next level of warning, report (if applicable), and keep an eye on their other edits.


 * Of course, you can forget the WP:AGF principle when dealling with a WP:DUCK!.


 * Anyway, good luck, and if you want any assistance, I'm more than happy to help. Stephen! Coming... 17:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * By the way, I highly recommend against withdrawing - the appearance becomes that you don't want to hear any more critique, and therefore have no desire to work on the "issues" that are being raised. As they're pretty minor in the long run, withdrawing can be a torpedo.   As an admin, you're going to be critiqued until the probverbial cows come home - if you don't want to hear it during an RFA, when will you? ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 18:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I hear you, but I'm done. It may appear that I don't want to "work on the issues", but I think that I've expressed that I am willing to work on them.  When I saw the WP:POINT oppose, I knew that it was over.  I just wanted to nip it in the bud before that part of the RfA got out of hand.  I appreciate the suggestions; I'll work on vandalism mislabeling and think about putting myself through the process in the future.  For now, I'll go back to my little corner of WP and do what I really love: edit, write, and improve articles. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I've done the formalities. I'm sorry for how it turned out, and if you do decide to give it another go in the future feel free to ping me. Amalthea  18:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

I'd just like to echo the statements above. I am personally sorry for what took place, and accept some blame myself. The reason I pointed out the WP:POINT!vote was because I think you will be a good Admin one day and I wanted your RfA to get a fair shake. My reasons for oppose (again, a very very weak oppose) was only the issue concerning WP:NLT. I know you commented on it, but unfortunately the whole discussion went to hell before I could respond. There are very few "bright line" policies on Wikipedia, at least the way I think about it. WP:Ignore all rules, IMO, means "Ignore all rules except WP:NLT,WP:BLP, and WP:3RR". As the admin that you are, frankly, destined to be, these are the strongest policies that you need to be aware of. If someone makes a legal threat, they are given an opportunity to recant the statement and (unless the statement is recanted) blocked. WP:NLT is about two huge issues: one concerning the Foundation and one concerning the encyclopedia. The first, and most important, is that continued interaction with someone who actually is pursuing legal channels against the Foundation is legally tricky and, well, without the WMF, there'd be no en.wikipedia. The second, and much more relevant to your work or mine, is that legal threats are far, far more likely to simply be an attempt to strong-arm on POV over another. It threatens the virtues of discussion, consensus, and the idea that we can all work together. All-over, I hope that my Oppose and this paragraph (that, I assure you, I did not intend to turn into atl;dr tome) just serve to remind you that edititng on Wikipedia (and RfA and using the mop) are all open-book tests. If you are unsure the exact way to deal with an issue, it's easy enough to look at the relevant Poli-line and look at how the community wants you to handle it. You do good work, and I know you'll continue to do good work, better work. Show improvement, and I'm sure I won't be the only one who switches columns to Support. Cheers, Achowat (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Better luck next time. On the good side, your RfA ended with more than 50% support which means your next one isn't hopeless.  Try again in a few months and I may keep my vote at support.  See you around and happy editing.—cyberpower  (Chat )(WP Edits: 517,501,855 ) 17:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi. Sorry to see some of the comments turned out a little less friendly than ideal (and I think your withdrawal at that stage was probably for the best). I do hope you run again in the future, and I look forward to giving you my support -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Wouldn't Take Nothing for My Journey Now
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Bob who?
I've replied on my talk page to your comment. I wasn't sure if the page would be reverted so I kept it on my watchlist. Sure enough you reverted, and I don't mind. I also realize your recent RFA nomination didn't succeed. Don't worry, I've also had a couple of failed tries so you're in good company. :) –BuickCenturyDriver 23:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually the hunch came after the edit. I sometimes have a feeling someone might not agree and revert, but if it does get reverted I don't take it personally and move on, as POV pushing always meets a sad fate.  However, I wouldn't make the change if was certain it would be reverted, though,  I hope this clears things up.  –BuickCenturyDriver 22:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

List of human Sesame Street characters
What happened to the lead? This version certainly isn't what the community voted as a featured list. I believe someone axed about 3Kb of the article in this edit. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

I was wondering if there was a way for us to sort the principal human characters from the guest human characters. Rtkat3 (User talk:Rtkat3) 1:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * RM, I'll explain. User:Fortdj33 took it upon himself to create a new article, Sesame Street characters, and then cut-and-paste the leads from the above list and List of Sesame Street Muppets into it. At the time, I decided to let it go (and gee, my failed RfA found that I'm too possessive over articles and lists that I edit), but you're right--it decreases the quality of both lists. If we keep the new article, the leads should be improved in the lists, at the very least. Personally, my preference is to retain the original lists, and delete the new article, which I don't think is necessary. I guess I was too exhausted at the time to make an issue of it. I'm glad you brought it up, since it really should be addressed. Any suggestions?
 * Rtkat3, that's an easier problem. If we wanted to separate the main characters from the guest stars, the easiest way, I think, would be to separate the table into two categories, "Main characters" and "Guest stars". What do you think? Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I think that may work. Rtkat3 (Rtkat3) 5:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I certainly think, as a minimum, that the lead needs to be restored to the FLC-accredited version, right now it fails to meet the criteria so should be delisted, and that's a shame given how simple the fix would be. As for the fate of the other article, well that's really out of my hands.  The Rambling Man (talk) 08:27, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I was tempted to do it anyway, but I wanted some input first. I'll put a link on the list's talk page to this discussion so folks know why it happened.  You're right, it's a very easy fix.  Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks very much for your positive response and prompt action, much appreciated. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Just for fun
I found this interesting blog entry about an unusual Sesame Street episode, and one man's (semi-)adult reactions to it. It's not even remotely encyclopedic, but I thought you might get a kick out of it. Against Big Bird, The Gods Themselves Contend In Vain. All the best,– Quadell (talk) 11:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Not encyclopedic at all! But you're right, very fun.  Thanks for the treat.  It is interesting to read people's reactions to and memories of The Show.  And every once in a while, the writers go into some very bizarre stuff, and since it's Sesame Street, they're able to get away with it.  It can be a great mixture of the educational and mundane with the edgy.  That's one of the reasons I love it and the Muppets. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 23:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Sesame Street lists response
If you are talking about the human characters, some of them had their bios up on the Muppet Wiki like Deena's caretaker Pearl. I have noticed that some of the Muppet characters either listed or deleted upon reverting don't have their bios up on the official Sesame Street website. I noticed one of the human characters doesn't have any bio info where I added what I knew. I just recently added a link to Fluffy's page on the official Sesame Street website. By the way, I'm thinking you might be right about sorting the regular characters from the guest characters yet we still have to let people know about anyone that was associated with the "Around the Corner" expansion in the 90's. What do you think? Rtkat3 (talk) 4:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Rtkat3, each entry in this list has gone through the criteria I referred you to. And in another discussion on the same talk page, I suggested (and no one expressed disagreement) that Muppet Wiki, as great a site as it is, not be considered a reliable source. According to WP:RS, user-generated websites like it aren't usually considered reliable sources. If a character's bio isn't on Sesame Street.org, then it shouldn't be here, either. I believe that if the source states that a character was part of ATC, its entry here states it. You can check it if you like, of course. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 23:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * And what about the possibility of mentioning which human are associated with the "Around the Corner" expansion when you do your sorting of the regular human characters and the guest human characters which I mentioned in the above comment? Rtkat3 (talk) 7:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Maya Angelou
Please don't hate me! Scartol  •  Tok  17:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

PR done
I've finished the PR at Peer review/Maya Angelou/archive1. Great article! Thanks for taking the time to improve WP. --Noleander (talk) 15:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Your HighBeam account is ready!
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know: Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasit &#124;c 20:42, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
 * Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
 * If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name tothis section and we'll try again.
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or askUser:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

DYK for Themes in Maya Angelou's autobiographies
The DYK project (nominate) 16:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Stories Project
Hi!

My name is Victor and I'm a storyteller with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. I'm chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who make and use Wikipedia have so much to share. I found your username from the Highbeam application list.

I'd very much like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project, or if you know anyone with whom I should speak.

Thank you for your time,

Victor Grigas

user:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 23:59, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Talk:William B. Davis/GA1
The review now appears done. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

The Wiggles - capitalisation of references
I've move the comments from my talk page to Talk:The Wiggles. Your response (on the article talk page, please) to my objection would be appreciated. Mitch Ames (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Wiggles ref for you:--Surturz (talk) 21:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks, Sarah! What an honor, coming from you! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Ionutzmovie (talk) 17:21, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Judy Freudberg
I heard on the news that Judy Freudberg has died, she was a writer for Sesame Street. I'm thinking about doing an expansion of her article. I thought of you! Sarah (talk) 17:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, that's cool. Well, not about her death of course.  Freudberg was a writer on The Show for years and years.  I, being the nut that I am, just looked at a few of my sources in my library and found a few things about her, but nothing that's not already in the article.  I can present you with a report of what I have here, though, if you like.  One thing you might say is that according to head writer Norman Stiles (see ), writers usually burnt out after writing about a dozen scripts, and Freudberg was the exception to that rule.  She was probably also part of the push to hire more women during the 70s and 80s, since she was hired in 1975.  You have inspired me, Sarah; I've been meaning to tackle another important SS article about an important woman in TV, Joan Ganz Cooney.  I certainly have all the information I need; I just need to buckle down and do some writing.  I also need to work on Jim Henson, but that'll take more research.  I'll get to it after I finish with some of my current irons in the fire: improving The Wiggles and a GAN review. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

"Triangle" Peer-Review
First off, I wanted to say thank you for the peer-review. Second, I made the changes you suggested. I just wanted to make sure I understood your ideas for improvement. Cheers!--Gen. Quon <font color="#708090">(Talk)  02:50, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Yah, all is good.  I think the PR is good to go, but like I said, wait about a week or two and re-submit it, and then you should submit it for FAC right afterwards.  I'll go and tie up the loose ends at PR.  Hey, I noticed that you're working on the Buffy articles, too.  My hubby and I have just started watching it, having missed it the first time, and then I went and read the article about the pilot and saw that it had just passed GA.  Good work!Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thank you for all your help. Yup, I think after I get all The X-Files pages good to go, or at least near that, I'll try to move onto Buffy, a character I love just slightly less than Mulder and Scully. ;)--<font face="Krungthep"><font color="#B22222">Gen. Quon <font color="#708090">(Talk)  19:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm looking forward getting to know Buffy and the series, and then coming to WP and reading about it. Hubby and I tend to get a little obsessive over our TV shows.  We got so obsessed with Smallville, we were watching it every evening.  I was so sad when we finished all ten seasons, and nothing has replaced it yet.  I have high hopes for Buffy.  I'm very glad that you're working on these articles, especially since Moni3 gave up on WP and abandoned us.  Good hands!Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

You guys sound like you have good tastes! I'm currently starting season 7 of Smallville and love it. I want to work a bit on those pages one of these days too. As for Buffy, I think you'll like it. It's got the feel of The X-Files with more humor and some great characters.--<font face="Krungthep"><font color="#B22222">Gen. Quon <font color="#708090">(Talk)  00:40, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Format of Sesame Street/GA1
I have reviewed Format of Sesame Street, an article you nominated to become a GA. Cheers, <font face="Arial" size="2em"> Statυs (talk) 13:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I have no idea where to tag this article in under GA. <font face="Arial" size="2em"> Statυs (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Muppets
Hi, i remembered a while back, you were interested in improving the articles about the muppets. It was my intention to start working on the articles months ago, but i wasn't able to find time (life, right?). I just wanted to let you know that i will be working on the Muppet related articles to improve and add to them. Some of the articles that i decided to start with are Annie Sue (Muppet) Beauregard (Muppet) Bobo the Bear Johnny Fiama Foo-Foo Yolanda the Rat Mildred Huxtetter Mr. Poodlepants Pops (Muppet) I was wondering if you kew any good sources I could use to find out more information about these characters. Please let me know if you have any suggestions, or want to hale me with this. thank you. Caringtype1 (talk) 19:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * C, that's great; there's a huge need for character articles in particular being improved. A lot of the above are Muppet Show and post-MS Muppets, so I recommend that you do a google-search on them first.  Of course, you probably won't find much in the popular press, since they're older characters.  Muppet Wiki is a good source, but don't use it as a primary source; use it as a jumping-off place and for possible sources.  You can also use the DVDs of the series for character descriptions; they're up to season 3.  Here's a bibliography for you:

Hope this helps! I can keep an eye on these articles if you want. Let me know how else I can help. Christine (Figureskatingfan)(talk) 20:08, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Of Mice and Men and Jim Henson: The Works: the Art, the Magic, the Imagination, both by Christopher Finch.
 * Kermit Culture, a great book about the philosophy of The Muppets. This may not have specific information about the above characters, but I always recommend it because it's very cool and a must-read for anyone writing about The Muppets.

Thanks for all the help. It's funny i have all those books and have been waiting to read them. Thanks, again.Caringtype1 (talk) 20:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Aboriginal title statutes in the Thirteen Colonies/GA1
I was wondering where this review stood. Your last comment is from a month ago, and there was a response eight days later. Since then, nothing in the review, and there haven't been any significant edits made to the article in well over a year. Can you please take another look? One way or another, something needs to happen. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:33, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for The Wiggles Pty Ltd
Yngvadottir (talk) 08:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Sweet! Congrats!AngusWOOF (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Review request
Hey. I'm usually not one to do this, but would you be able to review Mercedes McQueen at GAN? I ask you since not only is it the longest-waiting GAN possibly ever, but since you reviewed the previous article nominated by the user so I imagine you would know what to look for. If you can't that's fine, just thought I'd ask. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:05, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey Wiz! Yah, I saw it there, and considered reviewing it when I saw that I had previously reviewed a character bio article from the same soap.  I'd love to do it, but it will have to wait at least a few days because I'm in the middle of a source check for Maya Angelou, which is currently at FAC.  When I'm finished, I'll look back at GAN and if it's still there, I'll take a stab at it.  I'm sure it will be, because as you say, it has been there forever.  My most recent GAC,Format of Sesame Street, was there forever too, and I'm usually strict about not having more than one article up for review at the same time.Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:16, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey, how's it going?
Just thought I'll drop by and ask how's it going with your editing. Best regards. Wifione  Message 20:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Um, not bad. I'm unemployed for the summer, so I have more time for it.  Maya Angelou is currently up for FAC, and I've created some new articles and DYKs.  I've done some reviews as well.  It's been fun! I want to start tackling some long-neglected Sesame Street articles and bios.  Why do you ask?Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 23:03, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Nothing particular. Was just checking in as I thought if you were up to an RfA again, I could assist you in the nom. Best. Wifione  Message 19:54, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)
Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:


 * Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasit&#124; c 17:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Angela Santomero
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Maya Angelou
Hi. I thought Leon's review at FAC was very helpful, but I didn't agree with one of Leon's comments, as I set out here. Do you know if any of the sources make the particular point at issue? hamiltonstone (talk) 07:38, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

FA for Maya Angelou
Congratulations for driving Maya Angelou to FA status! I wanted to dig in and review it further but I never found the time. At the FAC I showed my disappointment about not having more visibility about Angelou's singing career because I truly like the Miss Calypso album. My dad owned the LP when I was born and I bought a CD of it in the 1990s. Angelou is pretty good; she even wrote some of the songs on it. Other people have ridiculed the album, or said it was an indication of how she was being used by the record industry, but that is not my stance. Binksternet (talk) 17:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Binks. This is such a huge accomplishment for me.  I almost cried when I read that it has passed.  My first edit was literally years ago, in 2007, and has been something I've consistently done throughout my entire WP-editing career.  I've never heard the album, but I have seen clips of her from the movie, and I agree of course.  Maybe we can get an image of Angelou from her singing career; Noleander has promised to help me with that.  If you have any sources about the controversy you mention, please bring it to my attention; maybe we can add it to the article.  Thanks again, especially with your help.Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * FACs are painful, pretty much the WP version of a breech birth. Totally cryworthy when all is completed. Binksternet (talk) 18:20, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * But you misunderstand me! ;) I'm emotional because of the time and effort that I've put into it over the years. Actually, this FAC isn't as painful as others I've experienced.  It was the first time "my" article passed on its first nomination.  I think it testifies to the importance of being prepared for FAC, and I can tell you that this one was.  I got so much help with it, from so many editors.  The next step is to try for an Angelou FT; it won't be nearly as arduous as getting this to FA. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 20:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Congrats! Outstanding job! Pumpkin Sky   talk  22:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Precious

 * Absolutely! Binksternet (talk) 23:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes! Gandydancer (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
For your hard work on the Maya Angelou article. :)

LauraHale (talk) 04:36, 1 August 2012 (UTC) <br style="clear: both"/>

New project
Hey Christine! I'd love your input on the project I am in the process of starting. If you have time to take a look, especially at the questions on the talk page, that'd be fabulous. Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 21:50, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

List of Maya Angelou works
Congrats on your new FL. Sorry I didn't get back to you, guess I forgot to watchlist it :-( Way to go with the main article too, btw. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Sesame street report
Hi, I hope you are well, I have finaly tracked down where a copy might be located. IBA sent the stuff to a uni, I shall enquire and report back with further details. --Crazyseiko (talk) 21:04, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yah, I'm okay, back to work full time so I'm busy. Um, not sure what SS report you're talking about? Christine (Figureskatingfan)(talk) 04:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * IBA Sesame street report from 1971 and the UK reaction to the series. I get some information there want some details, Which parts woudl be the most useful to look and view in your mind? --Crazyseiko (talk) 16:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

DRN needs your help!
Hey there Figureskatingfan, I noticed you've listed yourself as a volunteer at the dispute resolution noticeboard but you haven't been very active there lately - I was hoping if you had some spare time if you could take a look there and offer some assistance. Thanks again for your help :-) <font face="Verdana"><font color="#078330">Steven <font color="#2875b0">Zhang  <font color="#d67f0f">Help resolve disputes! 11:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Behind the Voice Actors-response
I have read your message. Unfortunately for those whose references linked to that website, the official Sesame Street website doesn't have bio pages for them despite the fact that the official Sesame Street website had released a YouTube video of Chicago the Lion having the jungle "brought to him" by Zap Mama.Rtkat3 (talk) 5:29, August 30 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you areactive in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page. In this issue: Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->
 * Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
 * Research: The most recent DR data
 * Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
 * Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
 * DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
 * Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
 * Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:02, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to comment at Monty Hall problem RfC
Because of your interest in dispute resolution,, I am inviting you to comment on the following RfC:

Talk:Monty Hall problem

This dispute has been going on for over ten years and there have been over 1,300,000 words posted on the article talk page (by comparison, all of the Harry Potter books together total 1,084,170 words). Over the years the dispute has been through multiple noticeboards, mediators, and even the Arbitration Committee without resolving the conflict, so a lot of wisdom is needed here. --Guy Macon (talk) 00:44, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Dostoyevsky
Hello,

I wast told by Ruby2010 on Grapple's talk page that you may be interested in reviewing Dostoyevsky. The article is currently on GAN and a team review may be reasonable, according to Crisco. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 13:35, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No, sorry. If you will fail it for curious reasons then it is better if you don't review it. Also why do you think it does not meet the criteria? Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 10:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Meh, I intended to create this subpage myself. --Kürbis (✔) 15:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)