User talk:Fordmadoxfraud/Archive 3

Laughton
Hi, regarding your comment there are some images of Charles Laughton as Captain Bligh here commons:Category:Charles_Laughton which I just uploaded. Regards Gustav von Humpelschmumpel (talk) 20:47, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I would've just replaced the image and then speedied the copyrighted one as orphaned. Ford MF (talk) 20:57, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

In big letters
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046733.html  Sceptre (talk) 00:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Be careful he's an admin...oh wait, be careful he has rollback...oh wait. Actually don't listen to him at all. The Highest Tide (talk) 00:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Fine. Let the trolls win. Sceptre (talk) 01:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LaughtonasBligh.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:LaughtonasBligh.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Louis Waweru  Talk  21:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Honest mistake, chappie. Ford MF (talk) 21:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Pamboeotia
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pamboeotia, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-dgra/0861.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Stupid robot! Public domain!  Ford MF (talk) 06:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Ephraim Kingsbury Avery

 * SWEET! I've never had one of those.  Ford MF (talk) 15:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Your RFA
Best of luck for your RFA --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 12:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Ford MF (talk) 17:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Pythagoras (sculptor)

 * Awesome! Jeez.  When it rains it pours.  Ford MF (talk) 02:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to ca:wiki
Never mind you can't write Catalan. Welcome to Viquipèdia!--Qllach (talk) 20:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I figure for some of the cross-linking chores I plan on doing, my toddler's understanding of the language and familiarity with Wiki software should carry me through.  Ford MF (talk) 20:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Usernames (re my RfA comment)
Not that I am one to talk, it should be noted! LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Jonathan James
Jon is my brothers best friend and a close personal friend of mine. He committed suicide some time today and my brother found his body at his house between 6-7 P.M. eastern. I am very sad right and i would appreciate it if you allowed my edit to remain in his honor.Thevitogodfather (talk) 03:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Replied on your talk page. Ford MF (talk) 04:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)


 * i have just one question. what happens if it is not reported in the news at all. is there anyway i can change it then?Thevitogodfather (talk) 14:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

NYC Meetup: June 1, 2008
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, elect a board of directors, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wiki Week bonanza, being planned with Columbia University students for September or October.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

Also, check out our regional US Wikimedia chapters blog Wiki Northeast (and we're open to guest posts). This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Atomised.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Atomised.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Before the Fantastic 4 No1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Before the Fantastic 4 No1.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Before the Fantastic Four Reed no1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Before the Fantastic Four Reed no1.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BlackSwanmovieposter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BlackSwanmovieposter.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Psophis

 * Once again, thank you kindly. Ford MF (talk) 15:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Brown's fabulous clipjoint.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brown's fabulous clipjoint.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Your RFA
Hello Formadoxfraud. Unfortunately I have just closed your recent RFA as unsuccessful. It was a close call, but there was sufficient significant opposition to warrant the closure as no consensus reached - (67/28/5). Read over the opposition comments and consider trying again in a few months. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not surprised. Thanks anyway.  Ford MF (talk) 14:39, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to drop by and say that I'm sorry about how it turned out. I would add that I disagreed with your opposition, but that's kind of implicit in my support. I think you would have made good use of the tools. And I share your need for caffeine. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the note, and thanks for supporting my RfA. Ford MF (talk) 14:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 67 'yes' against 28 'no' is 'no consensus'? [stunned silence] It's decisions like these that make me feel that Jimbo's famous "adminship is no big deal" quote hasn't got any relevance to the current attitude on the RfA pages. Anyway. I'm really sorry it failed. Channel &reg;   23:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm with you on that, Channel-- especially given the gulf between how much was written by the supporters & how little was written by the opposers. --mordicai. (talk) 14:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You are all very kind. Thanks.  Ford MF (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

FM, I was gone from Friday till Tuesday with scrambling on either side of the trip, so I didn't get to write sooner. I'm really sorry that it didn't work out. I think that two biased editors shot you down with energized buzz words, and then we had a drive-by pile-on. I too edit in some pretty unsavory articles from time to time to keep WP uncensored but out of the gutter and avoiding soapbox. I think that those who don't get into the edgier issues lack the experience to solve problems, but it is hard to stand in the gutter without getting stinky. Good luck! --Kevin Murray (talk) 17:05, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You know... one becomes much less of an inclusionist when one goes heavy into newpage patrol. I'm sure you'll do better next time around. DS (talk) 18:50, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fearlessvampirekillers.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Fearlessvampirekillers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It's been replaced with a superior image, so it's best probably deleted. Thanks, robot!  Ford MF (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Ego
Also keep in mind Ego the Living Planet's AFD, which resulted in a snowball keep. BOZ (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


 * You might want to be careful about which article names you throw about and how often ... voted "keep" once doesn't mean no one can ever mess with it again, and someone might take repeated mentions of a failed AFD on an obscure character as a challenge to try again. :) BOZ (talk) 15:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm not really turned on by the idea of keeping possibly controversial articles by "hiding" them from people who might want to nominate them for deletion. Ford MF (talk) 15:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

WT:FICT revert
No offence intended; I assumed that it was accidental, but I wasn't going to try and put your comment back in the right place as I reverted, partly due to the edit frequency and partly because I couldn't be sure what the right place would've been. SamBC(talk) 17:52, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No offense taken. I assumed as much.  Ford MF (talk) 17:54, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Image of Titus
Please explain why you have reverted to a gigantic image of Titus which completely distorts the Elder Pliny article! I plan to revert your edit to the original or if not, delete the image entirely. Peterlewis (talk) 20:48, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Image of Hadrian
Thanks, pretty funny eh? What you did was the obvious solution but I didn't have time. Should something be done about a note on the image's page? Doug Weller (talk) 16:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Your message
What are you talking about? Arienh4(Talk) 16:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

The Marvel Comics Guide to New York City
Hey cool, source as much as you possibly can with that. :) BOZ (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I plan to! That's why I got it.  I figure if I do ten pages a day before my regular before-bed Wiki work, I can finish it by the end of the month.  Ford MF (talk) 03:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Awesome. :) BOZ (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Sacntum Sanctorum - d'oh! :) BOZ (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * One thing: If there are in-universe facts verifiable by a particular issue of a comic book itself, then that issue is the direct, concrete source to cite. Citing this book for things that the comics themselves verify seems like book promotion. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, I guess can't argue with your reasoning; it's sound, and I empathize completely. I guess I would only use this book about NYC locations to cite location-oriented facts; the cite for Dr. Strange going to the Himalayas and meeting the Ancient One seemed a bit outside that.


 * And take heart: Captain America and Galactus both contain voluminous citations from the comics themselves, so, hopefully, the situation isn't as dire as all that (though heaven knows I understand how frustrating it can be sometimes to work in a community more fan-oriented perhaps, than research-oriented. One can be both, after all.)


 * Good to have someone with us with such obvious research skills! I'm quite a bit looking forward to working with you. We have some excellent editors here; it's a pretty nice community overall. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Fictional characters
Is some times that i want to say something in Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) about the policy, but usually i'was too lazy to write in english :)  --Yoggysot (talk) 04:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Vithericus
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Vithericus, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Vithericus is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Vithericus, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Go for it. I thought there was an article there to redirect to.  If not, delete, wily robot, delete.  Ford MF (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Fiction
Good comments at Fiction. I'm afraid this won't die easilly, and not with out some pain. My experience is that these need to have oak stakes driven throguh the hearts, or these become the undead. Film was a good example of a very emotional subject that wouldn't died and finaly passed when people were just worn-out and the right forum was in attendance. We have had a similar problems with ATT. --Kevin Murray (talk) 18:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Gavin's mediation?
Psst, you're a little late to the party. ;) Eventually, he did agree to do mediation with us, and has been involved for about 6 weeks now. I've been working on the Kender trimming part, but been busy for a few days. I plan to get back to it again starting tomorrow, god willing! :) I'm hoping to not have to do any arbitration in the future, because one of the main complaints people had against him was incivility, and he's been quite a bit nicer for the last few weeks, and I'm hoping very badly that it stays that way! BOZ (talk) 05:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, looks like I didn't pay any attention to the date on that. Sorry.  I was in a bit of a time crunch, and had to leave the house, so I probably didn't read it as carefully as I should have.  Ford MF (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem - you can watch how it's been playing out at your leisure. There have been rough patches (like there is right now, which began after I left you the above more-optimistic note), but when we have worked together, it's been better than it ever was before - more actual collaberation and less confrontation. BOZ (talk) 16:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

A barnstar

 * My first barnstar! Sweet.  Ford MF (talk) 20:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Slam Book
I see that you voted "strong keep" on Slam book and suggested that it would be easy to source. I would like to hold you to that. So far, the article has a single reference which is no better than a partial definition. If you can do anything to improve this it would be much appreciated. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I like a challenge! Unfortunately, I'm leaving for Mexico in a couple hours, so I probably won't have much chance to tinker with the article.  But I promise it'll be high on my to-do list when I return from holiday.  Cheers.  Ford MF (talk) 20:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Alumni relations
Regarding this, refer to the Alumnus article: "As indicated in the American Heritage Dictionary, an alumnus or alumna is either someone who has attended the school (or a "former student of a school") or someone who has graduated from the school."

The fact that Seung Hui Cho turned out to be a murderous psychopath doesn't change the fact of his association with Virginia Tech as a former student. For precedent, note that Charles Whitman can be found in Category:University of Texas at Austin alumni. --Dynaflow  babble  03:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I stand corrected in that case. Cheers.  Ford MF (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Images
Hey, psst. :) BOZ (talk) 18:02, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Well that's handy. Thanks!  Ford MF (talk) 18:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

RfA Review
Hello. I've noticed that you have a completed set of responses to the RfA Review question phase at User:Fordmadoxfraud/RfA review, but they don't seem to be included on the list of responses here. If you've completed your responses, please can you head to RfA Review/Question/Responses and add a link to them at the bottom of the list so that they get included in the research. We have a closing date of midnight UTC on 1st July, so please add your link before this date. Once again, thank you for taking the time to participate in the Question Phase of RfA Review.Gazimoff Write Read 12:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

*random* thanks
... for looking after List of convicted computer criminals. I hadn't glanced at it in a while, and it's nice that there's a continued interest in keeping it tidy.

Should you experienced some future renewed interest in submitting an RfA, do shoot me an e-mail. My address is on my userpage. Cheers :)

—Adrian~enwiki (talk) 2008-06-29 08:23Z
 * Mighty kind of you. Thanks.  Ford MF (talk) 21:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sabir Mateen.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sabir Mateen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Happy Independence Day!
As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, -- Happy Independence Day!   Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 00:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, that was kind of you, thanks! As it turns out, I am in fact a card carrying member of the American social experiment.  Ford MF (talk) 13:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Gabriel the Devil Hunter
Nice work! I might have some recommendations for other articles to expand like that if you are interested. :) BOZ (talk) 16:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * And thanks for putting up all the pics - I'll remove them from my list. :) BOZ (talk) 02:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Shit, I keep forgetting that list, sorry! Ford MF (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * It's OK, I removed a ton of stuff from it that people have added in the past few months. I'll add more sooner or later, but the numbers are really coming down.  :)  So, back to my previous question, would you like me to make some recommendations on characters you could expand/source/whatever?  What sorts of characters or comics are you interested in - I've noticed you like occult/horror types, and generally 70s-era stuff. BOZ (talk) 15:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I do tend to lean towards that stuff, partially because I like it and partially because its coverage here isn't as good as the coverage of other eras and genres of comics. Feel free to make suggestions, but I can't make any promises I'll get to them this lifetime.  I've got enough Wikiprojects on my plate.  Cheers.  Ford MF (talk) 15:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, that's what suggestions are for! :)  Let's see, I posted this on Asgardian's talk page since he likes to "adopt" and fix up articles, but he never really bit:


 * Let's see... looking through my own watchlist. Amphibion might be OK for you. Cloud hasn't had a lot of attention. You might like Dark-Crawler - he's got a lot of potential but I was never sure what to do with him. Maybe the Enforcer would appeal to you? There's a lot of work that can be done with Gabriel the Devil Hunter, but I'm not sure how close that one is to where you're coming from.  Grotesk has potential. You might find Hildegarde interesting, I'd say. Well, I don't know, that's a few that I started to think about maybe.  I'll look through a bigger list at some point and probably have better luck there.  :)


 * In addition to those I suggested above, some other stubs you might be interested in developing:


 * Aireo
 * Baron Brimstone
 * Bereet
 * Blackbird (Femizon) (aka Jackdaw)
 * Bres (comics)
 * Brynocki
 * Captain Barracuda
 * Commander Kraken
 * Condor (comics)
 * Damon Dran
 * Dansen Macabre
 * Diamondhead (comics)
 * Flying Tiger (Marvel Comics)
 * Geirrodur
 * Iron Cross (Marvel Comics)

That's what I posted on his page at least (minus Gabriel, which you did an excellent job on). I'll try to find some more that you might like – Moondark came to mind, for one, and Doctor Glitternight also. BOZ (talk) 16:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Just a note re Moshikal
This is something I commented on at Moshikal's talk page, but I just wanted to drop the note here as well.

The editor is, now and again, hitting infoboxes that have problem images. The one you cited, Machinesmith, is such a case: the old image is from one of the Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe runs. Using those is counter to the project guides since it's pulling an image from an encyclopedia and putting it to the same use.

If Moshikal had left an edit summary (another major issue in and of itself) stating that was the reason for the change, I would have less of a quibble. But without that, it just looks like part of the "newer" pattern.

And I agree with you, it would be nice if he engaged in discussions. It's very, very frustrating that we now got a situation where there are 5 areas for warnings (cut-n-paste moves should have been added with the The Punisher War Journal move, and at 3 or 4 given the editor's history) and 1 notice And that's without the fast and dirty FURring method he's using. - J Greb (talk) 14:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm aware that fair use does not permit the uploading of images from DC Who's Who and OHOTMU and similar resources.


 * What's most frustrating, to me, is that Moshikal more than occasionally does upload images that are useful and correctly sized. A good deal of his/her edits are genuinely valuable to the project.  Yet despite being reached out to by several editors, Moshikal seems intent on driving the slow road to blocksville.  Ford MF (talk) 15:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:General Slocum.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:General Slocum.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. |EPO| da: 20:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

This might interest you
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics BOZ (talk) 17:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * More info has been posted on the talk page. BOZ (talk) 16:28, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Any updates to share with the rest of the class? :) More discussion has gone on at the talk page. BOZ (talk) 14:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Land Raider (Warhammer 40,000)
Please don't edit closed AfDs. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Stellaris
Psst,

See the edit history on Stellaris - that should make it clear. Rather than edit war with User:Seraphimblade over it, I decided to just recreate it at Stellaris (comics). I'd kindly like to request that you please leave that first one the way it is, as the new one is likely to become a target of deletion if we touch the redirect again. BOZ (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up. I hadn't noticed that.  Ford MF (talk) 20:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. :) Did you see the additional notes on the project talk page about the rest of those books from the 70s? BOZ (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I did, but there's only so much room in my "reference material for Wikipedia" budget! Ford MF (talk) 21:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL, but those are useful in general. :) BOZ (talk) 21:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Category:Albums produced by Joe Walsh
The category has more than one entry in it. But if you look at it, all but one of the albums in the category was co-produced by Walsh and at least two other people. The same was pretty much true of Category:Albums produced by Robert Ellis Orralll, which had six co-produced albums but none produced exclusively by him. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Category:Sword-and-Sorcery films
Weren't you going to do something with this? IIRC, you proposed two more categories. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 15:09, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you read this thread? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 15:38, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I read it. I am currently engaged elsewhere, but I will try to get to this as soon as I can.  Thanks for checking.  Ford MF (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Almost a month has passed. You still up for it? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Busy month for me. I run a college bookstore, so it's been a while since I've had two seconds to rub together.  Still on my back burner, sorry.  Ford MF (talk) 23:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Panopeus (disambiguation)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Panopeus (disambiguation), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Panopeus. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It is a work in progress, robot, but thanks! Ford MF (talk) 15:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, please use the "move" tool to move articles to new titles, as that preserves the legally-required user attribution in the page history. Cut-and-paste moves don't keep the history and therefore violate GFDL license. Thanks! -  Toon  05  16:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I knew that. The only explanation I can offer for not having done it that way ... perhaps I had a brief, otherwise unnoticed brain aneurysm.  I can't think of any other reason.  Ford MF (talk) 16:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Second Annual WikiNYC Picnic
Greetings! You are invited to attend the second annual New York picnic on August 24! This year, it will be taking place in the Long Meadow of Prospect Park in Brooklyn. If you plan on coming, please sign up and be sure to bring something! Please be sure to come! You have received this automated delivery because your name was on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 20:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Pubisher article
Hi Fordmadoxfraud (great username, btw) - I noticed you did a copyedit of the Punisher game article. Thanks! Keep up the great work :-) Tbsdy lives (talk) 04:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

"Referencing of other Wikipedia articles"
I apologize! I should have been more careful. --Ships at a Distance (talk) 01:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

D&D articles for Wikipedia 0.7
Hi there! :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 19:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikis Take Manhattan
WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City. The event is based on last year's Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, and has evolved to include StreetsWiki this year as well.

LAST YEAR'S EVENT


 * Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Spring 2008 (a description of the results, and the uploading party)
 * Commons:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Gallery (our cool gallery)

WINNINGS? Prizes include a dinner for three with Wikipedia creator Jimmy Wales at Pure Food & Wine, gift certificates to Bicycle Habitiat and the LimeWire Store, and more!

WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, September 27th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.

WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!

REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.

WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's West Village office. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:


 * Wikis Take Manhattan page at The Open Planning Project


 * 349 W. 12th St. #3
 * Between Greenwich & Washington Streets
 * By the 14th St./8th Ave. ACE/L stop

FOR UPDATES

Check out:


 * Wikis Take Manhattan main website

This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.

Thanks,
 * Pharos

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Under the volcano.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Under the volcano.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:34, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Origen
Thanks for your interest and feedback.

I'm sorry to say, but I think I have been waiting long enough: the move was suggested eight months ago!

Moreover, the "Origen" page is not called "(disambiguation)", as you might have noticed.

As for the links under "Modern Uses of the Name", I simply moved them out of the original page where they even less belonged.

Cordially, --Dampinograaf (talk) 14:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Vertigo encyclopedia
I see you've been adding a lot of references to this - I was discussing the book with ntnon and was unsure how useful it is. What do you make of it?

Also while I'm here - do you think we need a category above Category:2000s comics characters debuts to link it across under Category:Fictional characters in comics? Something like... "Comics character debuts" or "Comics character by debut"? (Emperor (talk) 14:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC))


 * Thanks for the feedback on the Vertigo Encyclopaedia - that pretty much confirms my suspicions: it seems so broad n its coverage it is going to rather thin (especially considering series like Sandman have been the focus of books). So I don't think I'm going to be rushing out to buy it.


 * I also agree with what you say about referencing - there are a lot of resources out there and it is sad that people aren't working on adding these, instead there is a lot of interest in endlessly regurgitating plot. I can only contribute things that interest me largely because there is a vast amount of material out there and only one of me. When I specifically going looking (as I did with Greg Pak and during the AfD for Michael Bair) there are plenty even in online resources, not to mention those in print. Ah well we can only do our best - so thanks for mining the resources you have.


 * Yes there is no rush on that bridging category. I'll have a bit more of a ponder and see if anything suggests itself. (Emperor (talk) 15:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC))

Barnstar
This is for taking the initiative in nominating all those categories for deletion just today, and for the work I see you have been doing recently in helping to categorize comic characters by their debut dates. It's a tedious job, but you seem to have dived right into it, and I think you deserve some recognition for it. Keep up all the great effort! Nutiketaiel (talk) 16:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Ford MF (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. :-)  Nutiketaiel (talk) 16:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

No consensus at Origen
I am kindly asking you to re-evaluate the discussion at Articles for deletion/Origen, which you earlier closed as "No consensus". Most votes seemed to unambiguously support deletion of the current disambiguation page to make room to move Origen of Alexandria back to Origen, and a move of the current content of Origen of Alexandria to Origen (disambiguation). The "keep" votes either gave no reason, never mind one based in WP:MOS, or demurred on procedural grounds that this was a matter for WP:Requested moves, not AfD. If it is indeed what you feel as well, I'd have appreciated you saying that in your closing assessment, particularly so I know whether to take it there instead of deletion review. But I don't think "no consensus" entirely reflected the discussion. Cheers. Ford MF (talk) 11:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * AFD has two outcomes, either delete or not-delete. I felt that there was no consensus to delete the page, and closed as such. Whether the page should be edited, moved, disambiguated, etc. is not a matter for AFD, and you are free (I think) to make the moves that you suggest as a normal editorial action. Stifle (talk) 12:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Comic debuts
Regarding this, shouldn't we categorize articles by only the first debut? I know WP:ANIME has a guideline for something like this, but I'm not sure what WP:CMC says about it. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Replied at your talkpage. Ford MF (talk) 18:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I did not receive anything. Are you sure you did it right? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Gimme a sec! Sheesh!  Ford MF (talk) 18:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Whoa man, you didn't have to bite my head off! Thought something happened there. Anyways, how would it be for a case like Superman's? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I sort of see what you mean. Any other examples of multiple comic debuts I should be aware of? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Categorizing redirects seems like the best idea, and WP:CAT-RD seems to agree. Well, thank you Fordmadoxfraud for all your help. See you around, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
Ford MF, I'd like to thank you for voting in my RFA. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again,  Spencer T♦C 02:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Redirects
Do you have something against redirecting articles, so that I don't exactly have to clog the AfD pages as much? When articles aren't going to receive any responses using merge tags, boldly merging or redirecting is an acceptable practice. Reverting them just forces me to nominate them at a later point. Just because I'm some sort of "evil ne'er-do-well" to people, it shouldn't entail undoing completely valid redirects. TTN (talk) 19:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * De-facto deleting articles that have recently gone through AfD as keep is disruptive. And the reason you don't want to clog AfD pages with nomination after nomination after nomination is a self-serving one, so I ask that you spare your hand-jive of altruism.  Ford MF (talk) 19:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Only six of them were in a recent AfD that ended in a keep (which only received three votes that had nothing to do with notability). What was the reason to revert the rest of them? I normally try to stay between five and ten AfDs, but I have to go above that in this kind of case. TTN (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Top 10 1.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Top 10 1.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Already taken care of, robot. Thank you.  Ford MF (talk) 14:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Section length, Book titles, et al.
Hi. Can you read this section and then offer your opinion on the points raised, specifically the issue of titles in the FCB, length and detail of given sections, what constitutes “fannishness”, etc.? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 14:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

DC Comics Encyclopedia article
I have been kicking around a few ideas here (and see the matching replies on my talk page). I suspect we should be able to find enough information to give add solid material on background and reception which would be more helpful than other articles which simply list the contents (e.g. OHOTMU) -I know the information I'd be looking for would be what the process would be in bringing this together and what reviewers thought of the breadth and depth of the volume (s). As you've been doing good work dropping in information from the DC and Vertigo ncyclopedias your input would be greatly appreciated. (Emperor (talk) 15:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC))
 * I'll try to look into it later today. Ford MF (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)