User talk:Elkman

If you ask a question here, you're most likely to get a response here, so you might want to put this page on your watchlist.

infobox generator broken
Thanks for you extremely useful NRHP infobox generator tool. I know I'm not the only one who uses it, and it's been a great help. That said, it's broken: Queries for city and county seem to work fine.  Magic ♪piano 12:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I've finally fixed this. The code wasn't properly establishing a database connection when querying by reference number. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing that! This query yields a similar message.  Magic ♪piano 14:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Litchfield, MN photo
Hello:

I would like permission to use your photo for a Meeker County Genealogy Website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdgenweb (talk • contribs) 18:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Permission granted. See your talk page.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

NRHP Query down?
Hey Elkman --- seems like NRHP Query has been down all day. Just a simple notification. Cheers--Pubdog (talk) 00:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I don't know what would have made that happen.  I just tried it and it appears to work correctly.  I haven't been doing any changes or messing around with the site, so I'm not sure what happened.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 05:07, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * All is well now. Cheers,--Pubdog (talk) 10:40, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

NR Focus redesign
Maybe you already know this, but NPS Focus has been significantly redesigned, and the URLs for nominations are all different. At least for now, the old URLs still work; the Old Fort Mitchell HD nomination still exists at http://focus.nps.gov/pdfhost/docs/NRHP/Text/89001170.pdf, but if you go through their search interface, it's at http://focus.nps.gov/GetAsset?assetID=a2ccc1d5-4c79-4cff-9443-d6d86db9d3e4. The new system is completely unsystematic, as far as we can tell. However, there's a new simple way to get to their records for a place: http://focus.nps.gov/AssetDetail/NRIS/89001170 takes you to a page with links to both nomination and images, along with other information about the property. Nyttend (talk) 01:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

So useful!
The HRHP inforbox generator is so useful - many thanks! Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 19:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

NRHP locations
Do you remember where you got the original location information for NRHP listings, that is, the source for the location your infobox creator puts out? I can't find it in the .dbf files I downloaded (from the 2009 version), and the old files aren't there anymore. Just looking to see where they came from, and what format they were in (UTM or lat/long). Thanks. Generic1139 (talk) 20:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Discussion related to the infobox generator
Earlier today, I started a discussion related to modifying infobox NRHP — if successful, this will result in the removal of the  parameter entirely. The proposal is merely to remove the template's ability to recognise the parameter, i.e.  will have no more effect than   would, but it wouldn't have any harmful effect either. As a result, should it pass, you'll be able to remove that parameter from the generator if you feel like it, but doing nothing won't have any effect, either. See WT:NRHP for the discussion, if you're interested. Nyttend (talk) 03:17, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited S. Edward Hall House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Community Chest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Invite to an edit-a-thon at the Loft Literary Center

 * We have also recently formed a user group for Minnesota editors. If you would like to join, please add your name to our page on meta. Thank you, gobonobo  + c 23:00, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

NPS has changed its URLs
NPS has changed its URL format; instead of http://pdfhost.focus.nps.gov/docs/NRHP/Text/71000300.pdf, it's now http://focus.nps.gov/pdfhost/docs/NRHP/Text/71000300.pdf. Just asking that you change the URLs provided by the generator, the ones following "NRHP nomination is probably at" and "Photos are probably at". Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 03:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Request changes to infobox generator
Once again, thank you for your very useful tool. I'd like to request some modest changes to the infobox generator, partly as a result of the Coordinates in infoboxes initiative. This work is deprecating the individual lat/lon fields in infoboxes in preferences to a single coordinate parameter whose value uses the template. If you could change the generator to produce this (see e.g. here for example, but a bot is editing many NRHP articles), that would be a boon.

A second change would be to add "#USA" to the locmapin parameter (after the state, if it's actually a state), allowing for the user-selectable map display.  Magic ♪piano 14:07, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, I've changed the coordinate display to the Coord format, so it should be current. Thanks for the heads-up.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 22:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick turnaround! Feel free to drop a line at the page linked above if you notice anything unusual with the conversions that the bot is doing. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Meetup
Hello. Here's an event happening soon. Might you be able to make it? Jonathunder (talk) 14:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Mia edit-a-thon
Minnesota Wikipedians are invited to an upcoming event. Even if this isn't your usual topic, experienced editors are needed to help new contributors. Might you be able to make it? -McGhiever (talk) 04:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

File:RailroadIsland.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RailroadIsland.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. &mdash;innotata 19:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

St. Cloud, April 15, 2017: Wikipedia as Social Activism
Please come and join if you can!

Shaded0 (talk) 22:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your Infobox generator
Hi, I have seen your NRHP Query site, which is very useful, and i was wondering how it works. to be specific i want to create something similar to work with NHLE data from here: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/data-downloads/. it would create a basic infobox using the historic sites infobox template but would otherwise work in a similar way to what you have done. I have a basic understanding of PHP but some pointers would be greatly appreciated. A Guy into Books (talk) 21:43, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

NRHP infobox changes
Hi, there were a couple discussion threads, since archived, at wt:NRHP; this note is just to pull out a couple items. One was whether you could fix it so that "locmapin = STATE" always appears, again. Or "locmapin=STATE#USA", i don't care. Often or perhaps always when you don't have any coordinates, it does not appear, and often this happens also when you do have coordinates. I don't know what triggers it.

I think my other leading request, if you are making any changes, would be for you to put "source:NRIS2013a" into any coordinates that your system does add, to help us sort out which coordinates have been improved or not. My requesting that, with some more detail, was in since-archived Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Archive 66. FYI, the other perhaps-easy-to-address changes were:
 * Also where your NRIS2013a data does not include coordinates (which is fine, as we often/usually have coordinates figured out some other way), could you possibly please include a commented out line for the coordinates, as in:
 * or just
 * to make it easier for an editor like me to put in coords (probably copy-pasting from the county list-article).
 * to make it easier for an editor like me to put in coords (probably copy-pasting from the county list-article).
 * to make it easier for an editor like me to put in coords (probably copy-pasting from the county list-article).


 * Also where the NRHP reference is now included (thanks for that!) the current intro is:
 * Optional reference text:
 * but there have been a case or two where the reference didn't work and editor(s) have pasted it in then not checked it, so I wonder if you could modify the intro to something like:
 * Optional reference text (please confirm this works and consider modifying as appropriate to describe the linked text and photos, or please delete it; please don't leave a bad reference displaying in mainspace.):

Thanks again for your other changes done. Again, even without any further refinement, the system is working quite well. --Doncram (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the delayed reply -- I've been rather busy now that I have a new job. As far as the coordinate source goes, I don't have any coordinates from the NRIS 2013 database.  It didn't come with any coordinates, so I'm leaving the old reference in there.  As far as your other questions go, I'll take a look at them a little later when I have time.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 21:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reply and notification to my Talk page. About coordinates, your collective database does have coordinates in it, although not for all listings, and although I hear you that they are not from the newish NRIS 2013 download.  Whatever the label is exactly, I would like for there to be a label signifying that the coordinates came from your collective database.  Make it "source:Elkman2009" or "source:Elkman2018" or "source:NRIS2009a" or "source:NPS2009unconfirmed" or "source:NRISoriginal" or any combination of letters and numbers at all, whatever would be short and perhaps descriptive.  Where did you get the coordinates from, that are included / how do you put it into words, yourself?  I would think it is okay to call it "source:NRIS2009a" because you had it when the 2009a version of NRIS was out, or "source:NRIS2013a" because it is what you have available now, corresponding to your copy of NRIS 2013a database.  Random letters like "Source:ABCDE12345" would actually be okay, though not very descriptive.  This won't display to readers.  It will just be in the coord templates and available for NRHP editors sometimes to check, and especially available for programmers to use to identify which coordinates came in from your collective database, vs. which ones have been positively checked and/or refined by NRHP editors using Google satellite view or other approaches.  One application would be for the wp:NRHPPROGRESS page to display how many NRHPs in each county have original vs. refined vs. unknown coordinates.  It would help in the overall initiative to improve coordinates, if you would provide your support for the conceptual idea that a source can be given.  Sorry if this is Too Long;  it's just I feel I have a failure to communicate, sorry.--Doncram (talk) 21:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Argh. To be clear(?), for Saint Martin's Catholic Church, your current system gives:
 * |coordinates = 40.36472°N, -98.195°W
 * I want it to have a source label (say that label is "Elkman2018"), as in:
 * |coordinates = 40.36472°N, -98.195°W
 * And for other items where your collective database doesn't have any coordinates, to help out in a smaller way with something like:
 * I think I have failed to communicate, argh. --Doncram (talk) 21:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I think I have failed to communicate, argh. --Doncram (talk) 21:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Your website
Hello, I wanted you to know that your whole website appears to have expired. I went to the infobox generator and got a big warning from my browser, and when I went to http://www.elkman.net, I got ads typical of a site that has fallen victim to domain drop catching. Nyttend (talk) 03:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It's possible that HostGator couldn't bill my account or something, and they decided to just drop me like a hot potato instead of emailing me to tell me that something was wrong. Not a good move on their part.  Now I have to see if I can reach someone in their customer service department.  Thanks for letting me know.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 03:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Since it has all that non-wiki stuff like mountain biking pictures, I figured you'd want to put it back for your own personal purposes, if nothing else.  Nyttend (talk) 03:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, and there's stuff on there that I need to update, like costumes I've built and such. It turns out they had my old email address so I never got a message saying they couldn't process my payment.  Hopefully I've got stuff straightened out, and they'll plug my web site back in soon.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 03:30, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Isanti County Historic Court House
Hi, I would like to use your picture of the Isanti County Court House. File:Isanti Co Courthouse 4.JPG, Created: 7 March 2009. Very beautiful picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduardoignacioaburto (talk • contribs) 17:42, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tymnet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MCI ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tymnet check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tymnet?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Minneapolis RfCs
Your input at 1, 2, or 3 would be welcome. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:15, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anesthesia for eye surgery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ciliary nerves ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Anesthesia_for_eye_surgery check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Anesthesia_for_eye_surgery?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your comment at Articles for deletion/Delgado Street Bridge
Please don't take that AfD nomination seriously. A new editor discovered Twinkle and went on a mass warning template and AfD spree today, even tagging the Main Page for deletion before a mass of editors got him to stop. Schazjmd  (talk)  06:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Special:WantedTemplates
Hi, I have been cleaning up Special:WantedTemplates and noticed that [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:%22_%2B_%22oldafdfull%22_%2B_%22 Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:"_+_"oldafdfull"_+_"] is pointing to your monobook.js pages. clearly these are false positives (basically a bug in how WP parses .js pages). it would be really great if you could add to the top and  to the bottom of those pages. by putting these tags in comments, it won't prevent the javascript from executing, but it will remove those pages from [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:%22_%2B_%22oldafdfull%22_%2B_%22 Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:"_+_"oldafdfull"_+_"]. alternatively, if you are no longer using the monobook skin (many people are using vector these days) and don't need to keep the old page, you could just have the page deleted. thank you in advance for your help. Frietjes (talk) 20:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mountain biking in British Columbia


The article Mountain biking in British Columbia has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No citations. All WP:OR. Not a notable subject. Someone's attempt at promotion of an activity and a bunch of locations."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Normal Op (talk) 08:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Minnesota Featured article review
Another editor has nominated Minnesota for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  21:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

History of Minneapolis
Hi, Elkman. SandyGeorgia said that Minneapolis was due for a FAR so I have been trying to prepare. In the lead, second paragraph, the following sentence is supposed to summarize about 200 years. After trying maybe a dozen permutations I got this. Can you agree to the facts and sentiment? -SusanLesch (talk) 18:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I'll give it some thought and see if I can come up with a suggestion for wording. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 18:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I have so far trimmed about 15K. Still hoping to avert a FAR. -SusanLesch (talk) 01:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi again. School started this morning. If you can contribute anything at Talk:Minneapolis please do. I'll be back when I can. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

NRHP infobox creator
Doesn't do anything - just sort of freezes up. I've never had this happen before. Please take a look. MB 22:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * My web hosting provider upgraded to PHP 7, and I didn't think about testing these changes beforehand. I'm in the process of fixing it, but it'll take a bit of time. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 23:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Just tried it again and it worked. Thanks for fixing so quickly. MB 03:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've fixed much of the main functionality, but I have more to fix at this point. I was using a programming construct that doesn't seem to work in PHP 7, so I need to rewrite a few things.  I should have everything fixed by Sunday or Monday. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 03:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Expanded MN State Capitol History
Hi Elkman! You mentioned on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Minnesota page that you were interested in history. I am working to expand the Minnesota State Capitol page have created drafts suplemental pages on its history. If you'd like to assess quality or provide feedback that is welcome as well. Help especially with proofing would be greatly appreciated.

Minnesota State Capitol construction

Minnesota State Capitol artwork (still need citation work)

-Myotus (talk) 18:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

History of Minnesota Featured article review
I have nominated History of Minnesota for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  23:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, Elkman. Worrisome to find this review underway. If there is anything I can do, please advise. I can't imagine that the article is very far away from feature quality. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ultrajectine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ultrajectine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ultrajectine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Veverve (talk) 03:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your photo
Congratulations. Your photo is at the top of MinnPost.com, in this article. -SusanLesch (talk) 23:09, 21 July 2022 (UTC) https://www.minnpost.com/metro/2022/07/why-are-wealthier-minneapolis-neighborhoods-receiving-extra-police-patrols/

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for I-35W Mississippi River bridge
I-35W Mississippi River bridge has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for History of Minneapolis
History of Minneapolis has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Requesting your review
Hello, Elkman. thought we should wait until August when I get home to my books before we start the Minneapolis FAR. Could you possibly find the time to review the History section? I wonder about some things: just one example, is it accurate to say NSP bought out the mills and used them for hydroelectricity? (Or is there a step from mill to plant?) I keep expanding (at featured article review, I had omitted lumbering!) and cutting in this section and will take a break now. Hope you enjoy this reading, it makes a few tight corners. -SusanLesch (talk) 22:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * They're allowing some time for the featured article review so we can fix it? That's generous.  I thought the FAR process was to get stuff delisted as quickly as possible.  I'll take a look at the History section as my time allows, though that's may have to wait until after July 9.  As far as NSP using the mills for hydropower is concerned, I don't remember reading anything about repurposing old flour mills for electricity.  If I remember correctly, Twin City Rapid Transit Company originally built the hydropower plant at St. Anthony Falls so they could power their streetcars, and then NSP bought the plant once TCRT scrapped the streetcar system.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 18:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Elkman. July 9 or later is great. Sandy has worked on Minneapolis off and on for about three years. She described it as continually five steps forward, one step back. We got a breather now because the sockpuppet farm is blocked, and WP:RSN resolved a long-running content problem.
 * Lucile Kane wrote two whole chapters on the transition to electricity. It's so complicated I've read it twice and am starting over again now. I believe TCRT leased the lower dam's power from Pillsbury-Washburn and then sublet the Hennepin Island plant (also built by De la Barre at Pillsbury-Washburn). In the meantime I'll figure out better wording in the article. Best wishes, -SusanLesch (talk) 15:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Kramarczuk's
May I please buy you lunch? Say after July 9 if you're busy? I'm going to MSP tomorrow. If you can, meet my friend Mark and me at Kramarczuk's at noon. Any weekday except July 4 or 12 (and they're closed on Mondays). -SusanLesch (talk) 14:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, we could do lunch. I'm going to CONvergence starting Thursday afternoon, so this Thursday, the 6th, at noon would work for me.  Friday might be a possibility, but it's more likely that I'll be in costume all day.  Otherwise, I'd be coming down from Blaine, over my lunch hour, which would work but it's a longer drive.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:17, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Wonderful! See you Thursday. -SusanLesch (talk) 02:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Minneapolis Featured article review
User:SusanLesch has nominated Minneapolis for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive
 Hello Elkman:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)