User talk:In ictu oculi/Archive 2016

Advice via the move request on Roller skates
I am currently trying to deal with a plural naming convention problem involving four articles:
 * Ice skate
 * Figure skate
 * Roller skates
 * Inline skates

There seem to have been multiple move requests (on both sides of the issue), whether they should be plural or singular, However, it seems that the ice skating crowd always seems to lean toward the naming convention which technically should be singular, while the roller crowd says that it is going too far with the naming convention rules as they are always used in pairs.

My question is this: as the move requests seem to be blocked by non-consensus on both sets of pages, how in the world am I supposed to get both sets of pages to use the same convention? Clearly both sides cannot be right and personally, although I side on the singular, as I argued in the most recent move request here, I agree that it is a bit of a grey area, and it could be that 'ice skate' and 'figure skate' should instead to be changed to the plural.

Where is the best location to bring up a discussion to decide what naming convention should be used for all four articles? The requested moves board has so far been unhelpful in resolving this problem so I am unsure of how to proceed, and I hoped you could offer insight. InsertCleverPhraseHere InsertTalkHere 13:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

An/i notice on your attacks
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Howdy! (Pat Boone album).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Howdy! (Pat Boone album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please do not harass Fyunck(click) on talk pages. A difference of opinion is normal but do not let your frustration cause you to resort to name-calling or personal attacks. Thank you.  Liz  Read! Talk!'' 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure, no problem In ictu oculi (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Second Chance
Thanks for the follow-up on Second Chance (1987 TV series). I'm embarrassed to admit I hadn't thought that far ahead.Bjones (talk) 18:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Christmas Song Book (Helen Merrill album)
 * added links pointing to Robert Wells, Franz Gruber and A Child Is Born


 * A Feast in Time of Plague
 * added links pointing to The Stone Guest and Mozart and Salieri


 * Cricket in Serbia
 * added links pointing to ICC and Stari Grad


 * Al Sarrantonio
 * added a link pointing to Underground (novel)


 * Convent of Beja
 * added a link pointing to Beja


 * Howdy! (Pat Boone album)
 * added a link pointing to With You


 * Pond's Theater
 * added a link pointing to ABC-TV

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
JMHamo (talk) 15:42, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * User:JMHamo why are you deleting it, you should use revert, and why are you notifying me of this? In ictu oculi (talk) 15:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Coexist (image)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Uzumaki
Hi, you've moved Uzumaki to Uzumaki (manga). While I have a slight impression that it was fine under "Uzumaki" title, my main concern is that "Uzumaki" stills redirects to "Uzumaki (manga)" i.e. the move has no real effect at all. Regards, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Aché (Merceditas Valdés album)
 * added a link pointing to Siboney


 * Harold Butler (musician)
 * added a link pointing to One Step Ahead


 * Mount Fura
 * added a link pointing to Mount Darwin


 * Willie Denson
 * added a link pointing to Mama Said

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Second RM for Southern Apls
You took part in an RM "talk:Southern Alps" which I closed with a "Technical close" and a move the page back to the original name under WP:RMUM,but suggesting that another RM could be started immediately. A new RM was opened one day later talk:Southern Alps, proposing that the page is moved from Southern Alps → Southern Alps (New Zealand) with Southern Alps becoming a dab page. Your are receiving this mass message because you expressed an opinion in the first RM request and AFAICT have not done so in the second. -- PBS (talk) 13:47, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Alex Dezen
 * added links pointing to Sunshine (song) and Gentleman (song)


 * Caitríona O'Leary
 * added a link pointing to Tom Jones


 * Caminando (Rubén Blades album)
 * added a link pointing to Fania


 * Chris Crosby (singer)
 * added a link pointing to Today Show


 * The Wexford Carols (Caitríona O'Leary album)
 * added a link pointing to Tom Jones


 * Wexford Carol
 * added a link pointing to Tom Jones

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Ziyue
Please, let's see the conclusion of the RM before moving any titles. Dohn joe (talk) 18:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Let's actually have some discussion rather than forcing things yes. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Exactly. There's no rush. Dohn joe (talk) 18:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Put a G6 on your redirect please. Delete it.In ictu oculi (talk) 19:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

The Queen of Ireland
Personally, I wouldn't have bothered with a dab page, but if there is to be one, it should be at, not The Queen of Ireland. The latter is unambiguous and refers to the film. "Victoria, Queen of Ireland" or "Our Lady, Queen of Ireland" don't use the definite article. Would you be okay with moving it (and moving the film article back)? If so, we could request a technical move, and save the bother of a formal RM. Scolaire (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The article was created with (film), it was removed, I put it back. As far as I can see everything on the dab page uses "The" one way or another, books, films, Virgin Mary, individual queens, but by all means move it to Queen of Ireland (disambiguation) if you think it's an improvement, no objection. But sorry, obviously can't agree with removing (film) as I already reverted one user. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, yes as I said, I wasn't the one who removed (film), I put it back. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 09:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I have opened a requested move at Talk:The Queen of Ireland (film). -Scolaire (talk) 11:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

A favor to ask
Hello in ictu oculi. Let me just say thanks for creating the article for Caminando (Rubén Blades album). I was wondering if you could do me a favor. You might recall that I created an article for Latin music (genre). I was wondering if you could find any more books that verify that the music industry's definition of Latin music is bit different as opposed to simply Latin American music. Anything would be of help including criticism, the reasoning, or anything related to it. The first nine sources on are the articles are examples of what I'm looking for. You don't have to do it, but I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! Erick (talk) 21:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The music industry, or musicologists like Continuum Encyclopedia? A lot of the latter isn't online or easily accessible In ictu oculi (talk) 09:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Either would be fine. :) I think it's comparable to the article for world music. Erick (talk) 14:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Edit War
User:In ictu oculi, since you have auto-review rights, I've decided to turn to you over what is turning out to be an edit-war on the WP page, Sepphoris. If you look at the history, the individual wishes to place at the lead of that article a picture of a statue of the "virgin Mary," alleging that she was born in Sepphoris. My view here is that this is hardly relevant to the article, but if he wishes to keep the picture, it should not be in the lead. Furthermore, I have the impression that the individual simply wishes to promote "Catholic issues," as some form of advertisement, based on his history of edits. It just doesn't seem right. When I undo his edit, he puts it back-up again. Can you please give me your view on this subject, or else kindly talk to the guy about this? Thanks.Davidbena (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Currently, it looks like the issue has been resolved by moving the picture further down in the article.Davidbena (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Hit n Run (Prince album)
This article is turning into a "rename war". Would you support a move to Hit n Run Phase One? warpozio (talk) 11:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Have commented on RM already In ictu oculi (talk) 18:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Cat holder move
Why have you moved it to a new article title with Adkins in it? None of her articles use her surname as she is not professionally known with it. An dab article already exists with Water Under the Bridge (Adele song) anyway. So it was a pointless move/creation. — Calvin999 18:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Because the categories were attached to the redirect, look. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Awara (2012 film)
 * added a link pointing to Krishna (film)


 * Get Happy!! (Elvis Costello album)
 * added a link pointing to So Young


 * Helena Concannon
 * added a link pointing to Matthew Russell


 * Le soldat rose
 * added a link pointing to Catherine Jacob


 * Los Acosta
 * added a link pointing to Balada

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Portobuffolé
Hi, thanks for your support in Talk:Portobuffolé and excuse me if I'm disturbing you again. It's the first time I make a move request, so I'd like to ask a few questions. I suppose one user's approval is not sufficient, how many of them are needed more or less to decide to move a page? If there're enough positive replies, how long will it take normally for the page to be moved? And in this case, will it be possible to do the same in all other language Wikis or just in this one? Thank you in advance, In ictu oculi! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.20.39.13 (talk) 09:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't know. I think it'd be needed to have 2 or 3 editors with long edit histories agree. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, today a veteran user, Otr500, commented the talk and said, even if expressing a different point of view than mine, that since there're 3 supporting opinions an admin could move the pages. Might you do it, please? Also for the about 20 other Wikis in a different language with Latin letters, as the first Dutch admin I told you about did with the other pages named "Portobuffolé" renaming them all "Portobuffolè". Let me know if you can move the pages yourself. And happy 2016! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.20.124.98 (talk) 15:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

I informed the community
I used a template in the talk page of Hebrew Christian that will inform everyone interested of my act. If the proposal will not be accepted, they will simply redirect the article Hebrew Christian back to Messianic Judaism. The page Hebrew Christian was already a redirected page, so it is really no big deal, I think. What I did is not something that would cause smallest chaos. The article was split into two, the talk page redirects somewhere while the page redirects somewhere else. It was obviously somebody's mistake, I had to change it.-- İskender  Balas 💬 11:03, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * What I was trying to say is, simply, I made everyone interested aware of what I did by using that proposal template on the talk page. If the community will see the change in redirection wrong, they will simply undo it. And I won't fight for it or something. -- İskender  Balas 💬 11:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay we'll see. Thanks In ictu oculi (talk) 11:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Seasons' greetings!


Steel1943 (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. In ictu oculi, hope your holidays are happy, and a happy new year! Steel1943 (talk) 17:45, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 18:55, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Let Them Talk (Little Willie John song)
 * added a link pointing to King Records


 * So Pretty (Leonard Bernstein song)
 * added a link pointing to David Daniels

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Alberto Vázquez (singer)
 * added a link pointing to Cuando los hijos se van


 * Beethoven's 5th (Nikisch recording)
 * added a link pointing to Albert Coates


 * Hey (interjection)
 * added a link pointing to Surprise


 * Márcio
 * added a link pointing to Rafinha


 * Tito Rojas
 * added a link pointing to Independiente

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, In ictu oculi!


Happy New Year! In ictu oculi, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. North America1000 08:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Front National
Hello IIO. Your comment has been questioned in this discussion because your !vote is opposite to the results of your Google Books search. Perhaps you can clarify. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Good name for a shortcut?
Since I noticed that you created WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT, can you think of a good shortcut name to link to Naming conventions (technical restrictions)? Steel1943 (talk) 20:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * er, not immediately, what do you think? In ictu oculi (talk) 20:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking NCLFL or NCLOWERFIRST. Steel1943  (talk) 20:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The second would be recognizable/memorable, WP:NCLOWERCASEFIRST even moreso. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:NCLOWERCASEFIRST. (I was thinking that as well before you even mentioned it, but originally thought it would be a bit too long. But, at least it's precise.) Steel1943  (talk) 20:18, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks good. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harem (Raffi novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agulis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Move of Downwell
Hello, earlier this morning, you moved the article Downwell to Downwell (video game) and then reassembled the original article from the new-found redirect to a new article about the engineering piece, a "downwell", used in downwelling. While I am basically fine with this, I wonder: why did you move the main-name article away to create a new stub, although everything needed to explain it is on the downwelling article already. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 10:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Lordtobi because I wasn't totally clear that downwell shouldn't be separate. However if you want to blank downwell and just redirect to downwelling I'd be fine with that. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, the about downwelling explains what happens, and the article about a downwell would describe the same, just that "it does x" instead of "x happens". So, depending on your opinion, I would either say that all Downwell-related edits of this case should be reverted and a "For the process see downwelling" should be added to the game as well as "For the video game see Downwell" to the downwelling article; OR we make Downwell a disambiugation page, although it might be nonsense for just two articles. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 12:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If downwell redirects to downwelling then any recent media products which overlap with either term could be mentioned on a hatnote on downwelling article yes. The only slight concern I have is that a downwell (noun not verb) is largely to do with riverine management, wheras that article is largely oceanic. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Mmmm listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mmmm. Since you had some involvement with the Mmmm redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 04:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

"Lovedso EP" by Svoy
Dear In ictu oculi, Thank you for looking out for Svoy's "Lovedso EP" page title. Kindly note that the correct title is indeed "Lovedso EP". For proof, please check the artist's website www.svoy.com. Thank you once again and all the best! Dyadyavasya (talk) 02:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Concerning esports player names
Hi thanks for voting in the page move discussions. However I want to let you know that WP:NICKNAME and WP:STAGENAME say that if a person is generally know by a name that isn't their real name, the article should be titled as such.--Prisencolin (talk) 23:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mount Amara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coleridge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

The Vote
For the record, this was an ill thought out move in my opinion. If you were going to create a disambiguation page at The Vote then i could just about understand it, however you created one here Vote (disambiguation). If that was your plan then should of been created at the The Vote and Vote (disambiguation) as a redirect. Secondly you have given primary to Women's Freedom League when this article only has a small section about The Vote (Newspaper). A subject you didn't create a redirect for. I personally think a move discussion should of been held as moving a page to give primary to a page with a different name certainly isn't usual. Blethering  Scot  12:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay In ictu oculi (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Have you seen the following redirects?
Paris (city), Mannheim roller, and Mannheim Roller. Created by editors who vehemently argue that small details actually make a difference! Not that I think they believe their own arguments. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Bizarre. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Benedict Jacka
 * added links pointing to Chosen (novel) and Burned (novel)


 * Marina Elali
 * added a link pointing to Natal


 * Summer Song (musical)
 * added a link pointing to From the New World

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Prometheus/WP:NFILM
Hello, In ictu oculi! I am Norbert. Thanks for your attention to the Demme-Prometheus movie. Please, let me give you some probably useful information. I am living in Hungary, at the lake Balaton, in the same city where Zoltan Demme has his summer residency and office, and I worked in the Hungarian crew of this movie when the Hungarian part of the shooting was made. I know the circumstances of the sockpuppetry you noted: There is a small team who handles the homepage of this almost 70 years old gentleman with minimum computer knowledge ( Team of  zoltandemmeworks . net, as indicated in his website ) and these guys made the action to place in the Ridley Scott Prometheus Wiki Article the Demme-Prometheus, as an alternative piece. This old man had no knowledge about this, and he fired these guys immediately when he became informed, and hired other ones. Otherwise, as I know him, he never cares popularity, he releases his books and films 12 yrs by 12 yrs when they are matured, and he refuses the all talk requests, media invitations and appearances, as he frequently says: lets talk solely the films and the books, instead of me, the reporters, the magazins, the reviews, etc.

However, the fact that I know him does not mean that I depend on him: when shooting, I was paid by my boss and not by him, and I did not see himself before and after. But his Prometheus movie was an important part of my life, I learned a lot while making it, so I feel that I have to help the improvement of the related wiki article. Being not a contributor of wiki, maybe I have to kindly ask for your experiences and advices for doing this, if you agree. I searched for further sources and I would place in the article the following paragraph: [Header] Further sources [Text] Rappai, Zsuzsa: Szépséges Balaton. Kossuth Publish House. ISBN 9789630975155. (2013). Szabó, Tamás: Nagy Balaton könyv. Mezőhir Publish House. ISBN 9789630842402. (2013). In addition, I would change the last sentence of the article and I would place the following: It was released in 2012 (and the IMDb reference and link). What you advise, may I do these, or maybe this method and this kind of not international but very local content maybe not recommended?

I work hard during the working hours, so I have only limited time for research, but I will continue the search for the reliable Hungarian sources and the English ones also (my little brother lives is California maybe he could also help me with information). In spite of the limited time for research I had found a 2013 website from Hungary, that shows the international presence of the movie in TV Guides, DVD stores, and Archives http://forimdb.webnode.hu/ []. I thought to place this as [Header] Further information [Text] Movie guides, archives, stores, as references (and the above link). What would be your advise, may I place this or maybe better not to do this? I saw your Talk Page and some of your articles and I think that with your classic and modern erudition and long time wikipedia experiences you can judge these things better.

Thank you for your attention, for your time, and for the hoped deliberation of my above plans. Sincerely yours, Norbert. 89.133.187.29 (talk) 14:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

To Be
Friend,

While working on the article for a short film entitled "To Be," I noticed that entering that exact title into the search box produces an article about a popular Japanese song. In reviewing the history of the redirect-page (made, as I understand, to avoid the breaking of links that already pointed to the song's article) and the disambiguation-page, I noticed that you are the creator of both and thought it advisable to ask you whether you think it would be well to make a search of "To Be" redirect to the disambiguation rather than to the song aforementioned. (I am sure that the links that fall within Wikipedia articles and that would be broken by the action could be fixed in advance.) I look forward to your response. Sincerely yours, Twozenhauer (talk) 17:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Twozenhauer yes, you're right. Redirected, will do a G6 tomorrow to fix the malplacing . Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Dear In ictu oculi, Thank you very much for your most efficient consideration of and judgment upon this matter; I hope I will not be thought foolish for saying that I have waited no more than a blink of the eye! I am glad that I approached you. Yours very truly, Twozenhauer (talk) 22:22, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Very nice :) thank you In ictu oculi (talk) 07:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Page move
Just to let you know I've moved the Oh Boy (The Mood I'm In) page back to where it was. This is the full title. You need to have more information first rather than just looking at a picture before performing such moves. Apart from anything, your redirected page title was inaccurate anyway.Tuzapicabit (talk) 04:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * You're My Everything (1931 song)
 * added links pointing to Francis Scott and Jerry Colonna


 * The Carnival (band)
 * added a link pointing to Janis Hansen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Sprung
You moved the videogame from Sprung to Sprung (video game) a few hours ago, but forgot to tidy up the hatnote on that page (I've removed it now), and also to sort out access to the dab page. I've retargetted "Sprung" to point to the dab page and listed it at WP:RM to get the dab page moved to the base name. Please remember to follow through when you move a page. Thanks. Pam D  18:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguating books
Please note WP:BOOKDAB which specifies that only the surname of the author is used for disambiguation. I've moved Dead and Alive (Hammond Innes novel) back to Dead and Alive (Innes novel). Pam D  21:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd like to repeat the above too. There have been a few books you've moved recently in contravention of the guideline mentioned.  This has been addressed with you before.  I've suggested in the past that if you don't like the guideline, you should start an RFC, rather than just ignore the guideline.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * And you're still doing it. Please respect the guideline, or seek consensus to change it through an RFC.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:47, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

unambiguous titles
Why are you moving unambiguous titles like Snatcher and Psychotoxic to disambiguated titles Snatcher (video game) and Psychotoxic (video game)? Unless there is another article in English Wikipedia with the same title there is no need to disambiguate, even though these words have a more common English meaning. Pam D  21:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * In the case of Psychotoxic I'm putting a prod on that anyway. Snatcher would appear to not be the main meaning snatch theft. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The word "Snatcher" doesn't appear in the article Snatch theft, so there's nothing to justify a hatnote or redirect pointing there, and no justification for moving the videogame article. Pam  D  21:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll correct a separate dab, no problem. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Unless "Snatcher" appears in an article it should not be appearing on a dab page. Pam  D  22:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It does now. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Is the move of Snatcher not unnecessary anyway? There is no other Snatcher, and a hatnote can easily point to snatch theft, and vice versa. --Soetermans. T / C 14:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I forgot to mention that I stumbled upon In ictu oculi's move because of, that's why I commented also :) --Soetermans. T / C 14:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marie-Louise Girod
Hello In ictu oculi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Marie-Louise Girod for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 18:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Larry May
Um any reason for the page move? GiantSnowman 21:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The philosopher. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop making unnecessary edits
Please stop making unnecessary edits. There is nothing wrong with what I did. Unreal7 (talk) 17:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Muddling up together books and music which were previously separated on a dab page is not an improvement. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Re: Lonely Town (Barndon Flowers song)
You misspelled "Brandon". :p --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes I saw that In ictu oculi (talk)
 * OK, I see you redirect to the correct spelling. I went ahead and requested the deletion of the misspelled page. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Please do, thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Re: New View (Eleanor Friedberger album)
So should New View be moved to New View (Eleanor Friedberger album)? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Given WP:NCM and the fact that the jazz album is in WP:RS books with the same name, yes. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Policy discussion in progress
There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "On a Night Like This", Fly Like an Eagle, &c., questions in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — Llywelyn II   15:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Rationale for moving X+Y?
Hello.

Can you tell me why you consider X+Y (film) a better article title than X+Y? Generally I think shorter titles are better since they're more likely to be found. If we had a disambiguation page that listed this: etc., then there would be a clear reason for the move. But there's nothing else titled X+Y, so no need for disambiguation. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * X+Y (novel)
 * X+Y (film)
 * X+Y (secret code used by Soviet spies)
 * I was looking at X&Y, but I suppose it isn't the same thing. And we don't want to be too helpful to users. I've moved it back. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Asian Test Championship
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Asian Test Championship &mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. LionsRule125 (talk) 02:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Georgie Davis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baby It’s You. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Showtime (TV network) requested move
Hello, In ictu oculi. Since you participated in the Starz move request discussion in 2014, I wanted to notify you of a similar move request I initiated for premium network Showtime (TV network). Since no one has commented yet, I hope you might take a look at the discussion at Talk:Showtime (TV network). Thanks very much. -- Wikipedical (talk) 18:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Debt Collector (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Debt Collector (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62; (talk) 18:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Apparently LittleBenW and Kauffner are back and have hacked my account
Sorry. No one has actually accused me of this or even hinted at it, but I thought you might find this comment amusing, given my history with these two users, JoshuSasori and the diacritic wars. (My query was why some diacritics but not others were inconsistently included for disambiguation purposes -- I'm as "pro-diacritic" as I ever was.) Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 14:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * sorry, I don't understand. There is an old account of yours on that page which is still in use and someone has hacked? If so you'd need to report it ASAP. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:21, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No, I was being tongue-in-cheek. Someone accused me of being an anti-diacritic warrior. I just thought it was funny given my history in that area. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 21:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Shit. Sorry. It didn't occur to me that the above title could be taken as referring to one of my other accounts. I meant that someone accused me (User:Hijiri88) of being an anti-diacritic warrior. The only way such would happen is if someone like LittleBenW or Kauffner somehow managed to hack this account (the one from which I am writing this message). Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 08:08, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

moved page Snowy (character) to Snowy (Tintin)
What was the reason you moved page Snowy (character) to Snowy (Tintin) on December 20? This violates a long-standing naming convention at Wikiproject Comics here, not to mention this breaks the consistency with the article Tintin (character). Thanks. Prhartcom (talk) 05:08, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I thought there were other characters in books called "Snowy" In ictu oculi (talk) 07:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * This you could have checked at Snowy (disambiguation); no notable characters named Snowy appear to exist (at least on Wikipedia). There are approximately 170 links to Snowy (character). Reverted move. Prhartcom (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Page moves for Icelandic names
Please see WP:WikiProject Iceland/Style advice, particularly in regard to using runic letters. Quale (talk) 04:36, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Misfortune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Messia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

RFC on Real Robot title
Hi. Since you participated in a recently closed (no consensus) move discussion for Real Robot, I’m just notifying you of an RFC on that title. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 21:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Long Shadow move
Please be more complete when you move a page like you did Long Shadow (documentary). It might be easier to use the procedures written WP:RM the next time you move something. Oldag07 (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems like you are doing good work though. Keep it up. Oldag07 (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Toil (concept) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toil (concept) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Toil (concept) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 02:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Title (album) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Title (album). Since you had some involvement with the Title (album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. sst✈ 11:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Devin Therriault


The article Devin Therriault has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 16:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

OK, a bunch of discussions on dab pages are not going to work
As much as I appreciate what you are trying to do, i think that we should probably address this problem at the back end, with a policy change or clarification. The real problem here is that the guidelines are not supper clear on what to do when the dictionary term is the most likely to be searched for (when all of the other topics are relatively obscure and people are just looking for the dictionary definition). As both of us have argued repeatedly, giving the primary topic to the least obscure non-dictionary topic is a problem, as it results in inflating the page views of that topic when really they should be being sent to the Dab page where there is a link to Wiktionary (there are other problems as well). I would suggest a policy clarification before bringing up more controversial RMs about this, because at the moment with this being a policy grey area, it is causing a lot of friction between editors. InsertCleverPhraseHere  23:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The RMs are generally coming the other way. I have suggested that before; on WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Talk page that if it is not already clear, then it should be made more clear. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Macolla


A tag has been placed on Macolla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 166.171.120.87 (talk) 03:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Toil (Shlonsky poem)
 * added links pointing to Phylacteries and Prayer shawl


 * Charles Péguri
 * added a link pointing to Musette


 * Hypnotic
 * added a link pointing to Urethan


 * Miguel Aceves Mejía
 * added a link pointing to Rancho Alegre

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Spring Rain (disambiguation)
Hi, what was the red link at the top of the page supposed to point to? Should it just be "Rain in spring" or is that a separate concept that should have its own article? Opencooper (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * April showers (weather)? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm, it's close enough, though It refers to a month rather than a season and is a bit specific to Europe in the timing. Maybe we should just play it safe and redirect to rain? Or have you heard the phrase used specifically for April showers? I'm having trouble looking up the exact phrase because I just get media with the same name. Opencooper (talk) 21:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Re About New Romantics (Hands Like Houses)
Not in the US. I don't can't say if the song did in Australia or the UK. But I can find out if you really want to know Platypus1375 (talk) 11:07, 24 March 2016 (EST)

Please fix links when you create disambiguation pages
Hello. At least twice today, you moved pages that had incoming links, Distant Voices and Keyholder, and then, without fixing those incoming links, replaced the redirect at the old title with a disambiguation page. Please fix the links first, as per WP:FIXDABLINKS. Thank you. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 20:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Right but the problem is what links here takes time to update after fixing templates. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * But you didn't even fix the template links; I did. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I thought I caught most of them - come on In ictu oculi (talk) 13:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Vince Mendoza
 * added links pointing to Sketches and Epiphany (album)


 * Yeah Yeah Yeah (Louis Prima song)
 * added a link pointing to Joe Morris

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

The Begotten
Hi there,

I just wanted to check the reason for moving The Begotten to The Begotten (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine). There doesn't appear to have been a dab article created in it's place, and now The Begotten is simply redirecting to the longer article title. I've done a quick search on google and I can't find anything else which would require the move, although there is a single novel listed on amazon with the same title (but the author doesn't even have an article, let alone any of her books). Thanks, Miyagawa (talk) 11:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah that was a mistake, I was looking at a poem by James L. McMichael, have moved it back In ictu oculi (talk) 11:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Morning Star (Nat King Cole song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morning Star (Nat King Cole song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Morning Star (Nat King Cole song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SST flyer  17:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation page edits and moves
In ictu, in the spirit of the some of the recent comments you've gotten here, you do need to start following the general practices and procedures for dab pages when you move things around. I've brought this up with you before, and it would be really helpful if you'd start following the guidelines more consistently. I know MOS:DAB is a bit complex, but you simply edit too many dab pages not to get at least the basics right. As a few examples of recurring problems, please pay attention to MOS:DABPIPE and MOS:DABENTRY. Please make sure to use pipe links to correctly employ italics and quote marks for names of works: for instance, Some Hearts (The Everly Brothers album), not Some Hearts (The Everly Brothers album). Don't include extraneous information that's not necessary for disambiguation (such as full composition credits), include only one blue link per line, and please make sure to follow normal capitalization and style. Finally, please stop adding entries to dab pages that aren't discussed at the linked article. In addition to giving the impression that you're editing dab pages to sway RM arguments, it hinders navigation. It misleads potential readers looking for that topic into thinking there will be coverage at the linked article, and it clutters the dab page for everyone else. Following the guideline when you first edit the dab pages saves other people a lot of work later on. It will likely also help your case in many of your RM discussions, as they won't get bogged down by arguments about what's actually ambiguous. Thanks.--Cúchullain t/ c 16:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm filling gaps in notable coverage as I go. Adding songwriters is at least as relevant as artists, please if you have been deleting them don't. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * All that's relevant is identifying the topic for readers, who in most cases will know the artist over the songwriter. Adding extra information is extraneous and makes navigation more difficult, and I'll continue to remove it as I see it. As for filling the gaps, that's fine if you're actually going to create an article. In most cases that I've seen, you haven't ever done this. Feel free to add (properly formatted) entries after you've done the content work, but again, please stop adding entries that aren't covered.
 * I'm not trying to reprimand you here, and most of your edits to dab pages are fine. However, you'll create a lot less work for other people if you follow the guidelines.--Cúchullain t/ c 17:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I've asked on the dab guideline page about italics. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Good good. I've responded there as well..--Cúchullain t/ c 17:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your new dab page at Pureness contained some errors, which I've fixed. By way of explanation:
 * Since pureness doesn't redirect to purity, it's not the primary topic. As such it shouldn't go in the introductory sentence, per MOS:DABPRIMARY.
 * Again, please make sure you use proper piping per MOS:DABPIPING. Song titles go in quote marks.
 * Please put the entries in some kind of an order per MOS:DABORDER. Within each grouping, the order can be pretty flexible - chronological, alphabetical, order by importance, etc., but it aids navigation if list things in some sensible order. So here, I put the purity link first, as (I assume) the most important, then listed Pureness (Aya Ueto song) next as it's the first alphabetically (it also came out first).
 * Thanks.--Cúchullain t/ c 01:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * These weren't all your errors, but on This Life (disambiguation) I made the following changes:
 * This Life is the de facto primary topic, so it goes above the other entries per WP:DABPRIMARY.
 * That move negated your changes to the This Life entry, but you put the italics in the wrong place, and the disambiguation wasn't needed anyway.
 * Moved This Life (film) above the 2015 TV series, as it's first both alphabetically and chronologically.
 * Reduced wording for the album entry, and removed italics from the band's name.
 * Corrected the style of the Sons of Anarchy theme; songs are put in quote marks, not italicized, per MOS:TITLES
 * Put the MercyMe song in quote marks and removed italics from band's name; I also simplified the wording.
 * Thanks,--Cúchullain t/ c 01:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * At Sekai, you didn't format the titles correctly. I also added brief summaries to help readers identify the topics.
 * I also cleaned up Progress. Again, please stop adding extraneous information to the entries. All that's needed is enough detail to help readers identify and find the subject. Also, it's kind of counterintuitive, but when the link is in the explanatory text - such as an album link for the song - just pipe and format as you would in any running text. See the "Switch" example given under WP:DABPIPING.--Cúchullain t/ c 14:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Kim Davis (county clerk)
I invite you to ongoing RfC discussion. --George Ho (talk) 17:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Chowky
 * added a link pointing to Indian Police


 * I Loved You (film)
 * added a link pointing to Vera Orlova


 * Morning Star (carol)
 * added a link pointing to Salem

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Agape and Eros
Thank you for your comment on the Talk for the above

The following front page of the above: https://books.google.com/books/about/Agape_and_Eros.html?id=Nk0JAQAAIAAJ

has the advantage of listing the titles of Part I and of Part II. Do you think that there is a way of downloading it to Wikipedia Commons, so that it could be uploaded to the article? --Thomasmeeks (talk) 04:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to discuss on Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Cyrillic)
Hello! As there is already an only proposed Wikipedia guideline on naming conventions (Cyrillic). The proposal is still in development, under discussion and needs of gathering consensus for adoption. Since I am well experienced on this subject, I would like to criticize the official transliteration of Bulgarian as it gives too many errors, which also causes some losses of sounds “ǎ (a hacek”), decentralise itself from other slavic languages (“c” and “š”  voices), which is also conflicting in itself (see street signs  and ). By this revision, it is away from being accurate and not able to satisfy the needs of an encyclopedia which claims to be scientifical. These are the reasons I invite you to read Scientific transliteration of Cyrillic and involve the discussion in order to contribute a possible concensus. Wish to see you here thanks Manaviko (talk) 13:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Moved page
Hello. In Dec 2015 you moved "Wedding (album)" to Neoui Gyeolhonsig (album), which is fine. However, the name of the album is actually "너의 결혼식 (Wedding)", and there is no need for a disambiguation term. I don't have an account, but do you mind moving it to the correct title of "Neoui Gyeolhonsig (Wedding)"? I explained it on the talk page and you can see it plainly on the album info reference given on the article itself. Thanks.

Edited to add: And if we're moving Shinhwa album pages to romanized Korean instead of translated titles, then Resolver (Shinhwa album) should move to "Haegyeolsa" (no parenthetical needed). Thanks.

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * I'm with You (Delbert McClinton album)
 * added a link pointing to The Real Thing


 * Joe Thomas (alto saxophonist)
 * added a link pointing to Dave Martin


 * Justin Stanley
 * added a link pointing to Holidays on Ice


 * Walter Thomas (musician)
 * added a link pointing to Muskogee

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ted Russell (musician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ted Russell (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ted Russell (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Waiting for Love (JJ Lin album).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Waiting for Love (JJ Lin album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * L'Autrichienne (film)
 * added a link pointing to Philippe Leroy


 * The Final Concert (Marvin Gaye album)
 * added a link pointing to The Right Stuff


 * Çayıryolu, Bayburt
 * added a link pointing to Mithridates

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

...Re listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ...Re. Since you had some involvement with the ...Re redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Jason Lai
Thanks for your message. It has been redirected and completely deleted towards the San Francisco polic. I have tried to restore it and placed on the talk page and in the Moving Log but to be honest I have no idea how to do (I tried manually but got a red message saying it couldn't be done.) Cg2p0B0u8m (talk) 11:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Waiting for Love (Shujaat Khan album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waiting for Love (Shujaat Khan album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Waiting for Love (Shujaat Khan album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 16:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * It All Depends on You
 * added a link pointing to Big Boy


 * Type conversion
 * added a link pointing to Hacking

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Purple Reign
Hi IIO

I've moved the dab page to Purple Reign (disambiguation) and the Future album back to the PTOPIC following request to revert the undiscussed move. If you're still interested in pursuing it, I suggest taking it to WP:RM. Thanks &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 17:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Mlynek
You moved the page Mlynek to Młynek (Nine Men's Morris), claiming it was a variant of Nine Men's Morris. But it's nothing like Nine Men's Morris! It doesn't use a board anything like it, and it's goals aren't even related to the goals for Nine Men's Morris. Mlynek is about block your opponent's pieces from moving, and doesn't care at all about three-in-a-rws, while the three-in-a-rows are the entire point of the later game. Darrah (talk) 06:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Page Move Question
I was just wondering why you moved low kii savage to Low Kii Savage here? From what I know the actual name of the album is stylized as low kii savage as per this. Is there some Wikipedia title style policy that I'm missing? Thanks. --Tow (talk) 04:32, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * MOS:TM basically, we'd need consistent print sources to do small type. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Antemasque (theatre)
 * added a link pointing to Ben Johnson


 * Little Jimmy Dickens' Greatest Hits
 * added a link pointing to Fred Rose

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Waiting for Love (Shujaat Khan album).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Waiting for Love (Shujaat Khan album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

God Moves in Mysterious Ways
It's your task to prove the subject is notable quoting reliable sources.Xx236 (talk) 07:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. What about the tunes?Xx236 (talk) 08:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * that's a very good question and a notable failing of 1000s of song articles that say zero about the actual tune, or even lyrics. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Alexandros Jakupović listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alexandros Jakupović. Since you had some involvement with the Alexandros Jakupović redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Rovingrobert (talk) 09:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ready for Your Love (Chapter 8 song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ready for Your Love (Chapter 8 song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ready for Your Love (Chapter 8 song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. George Ho (talk) 19:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Muse (Jolin Tsai album).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Muse (Jolin Tsai album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 11 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, I went ahead and restored this file to the Muse (Jolin Tsai album) page as the other one that was replacing it has not been approved yet (no rationale for replacing). AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited God Moves in Mysterious Ways, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Diacritics
Hello. Do you think there is an argument for moving Bojan Djordjic back to Bojan Đorđić? He's not Western, he doesn't live in a Western country, and his Instagram account gives his name with diacritics. Rovingrobert (talk) 03:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * He appears to be a Swedish national. When someone takes Western nationality - which he did as a teenager - they often lose original spelling. However in this case, Sweden isn't as xenophobic as some other countries and if that is genuinely his Instagram account then maybe he has not simplified his name. You could just move it. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information. Just to clarify, when you moved the article back and forth, were you just testing move rights? Rovingrobert (talk) 07:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's all. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I'll start a move request. Lord knows there are a lot of xenophobes on here. What do you think? Rovingrobert (talk) 00:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * There may be one or two vocal individuals, but most en.wp editors aren't xenophobes, the football ones for example are hugely internationalist. As a testimony to that there's only 1 bio on the whole of the corpus of 4 million articles which has a local consensus to "Anglicize" a foreign name. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay. I've mainly floated around tennis until now. Even there what I said is probably an understatement, since most articles where diacritics would be applicable are titled accordingly. Which bio was that, just out of personal interest? Rovingrobert (talk) 01:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Fallen Angels (unreleased Bob Dylan album) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fallen Angels (unreleased Bob Dylan album). Since you had some involvement with the Fallen Angels (unreleased Bob Dylan album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SST flyer 12:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Unreal7 activity. Thank you. CookieMonster755 📞 ✉ ✓ 00:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Pentagon (Bangladeshi band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pentagon (Bangladeshi band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pentagon (Bangladeshi band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   ~ Moheen    (talk)  21:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Papa, Can You Hear Me Sing.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Papa, Can You Hear Me Sing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Ready For Your Love (Chapter 8 song).jpg
The article that the image depends on is now merged to the parent article. Shall I request speedy deletion right away? --George Ho (talk) 02:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Apologies for threatening you
I must apologize for making a bad conversation with you. I tried to raise my concerns about your... ways, but the approach was wrong. I shouldn't have make you feel threatened, even when I didn't intend to threaten you. I hope you'll forgive me one day if you will. Maybe I'll help you ease your fascination on distinctive topics in a positive way, not negative like reporting to ANI. How do I guide you or help you learn to accept the concept of disambiguation and the concept of primacy in a positive way? --George Ho (talk) 11:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Snatcher
I invite you to latest RM discussion. --George Ho (talk) 07:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Climb (Leiber and Stoller song).jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:The Climb (Leiber and Stoller song).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

All okay?
It's been a month since your last contrib. Just checking that all is well.... Dohn joe (talk) 00:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * A second month is getting me worried too. —BarrelProof (talk) 14:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * In ictu oculi, we have not seen you around. I hope you are okay. Like BarrelProof said, it is concerning. You are a wonderful friend and contributor. Praying. Ḉɱ̍ 2nd anniv.   18:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Today&#39;s Chinese Version.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:Today&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angel Melendez and the 911 Mambo Orchestra


A tag has been placed on Angel Melendez and the 911 Mambo Orchestra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Postcard Cathy (talk) 20:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vina Jackson


The article Vina Jackson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Mduvekot (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Parallelity


The article Parallelity has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a valid disambiguation page. The second link does not say "parallelity" explicitly, while the third one was deleted at AfD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Sprung?!
Regarding this edit; I'm willing to accept that the claimed reference is legitimate and was provided in good faith.

However, I've seen no sign anywhere else that the title of the film began with "Sprung!" Are you sure that you're not misinterpreting the title of the magazine's review as being that of the film itself?

I can't check this personally as the reference isn't online, but my gut reaction is that this is the most likely explanation. Ubcule (talk) 09:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Dangerous Women listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dangerous Women. Since you had some involvement with the Dangerous Women redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SST flyer  14:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

King's Record Shop
Why did you move King's Record Shop when nothing else uses this name? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Guardianes Del Amor


The article Guardianes Del Amor has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NBANDS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 06:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Female Convict Scorpion 1972.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Female Convict Scorpion 1972.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Gail Zeiler


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gail Zeiler. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kacey Jones. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kacey Jones – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Laun chba  ller  11:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Moved to her professional name Kacey Jones. —  Wylie pedia  11:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Circus (1949 song)
Letting you know about this since it doesn't appear that you were notified. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 19:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The Blackbirds (German band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Blackbirds (German band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Blackbirds (German band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wasabi,the,one (talk) 21:43, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Horseplay (band)


The article Horseplay (band) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails NBAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — swpb T 19:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Horseplay (band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horseplay (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Horseplay (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — swpb T 16:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Joan Baez's "Night They Drove Dixie Down"
I know it's been three years since you made, but can you track down the source and complete the sentence? At the moment the quote just suddenly stops at "but it made". —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Horseplay (band)
I Am — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.97.170.173 (talk) 12:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

You removed the prod tag from this page without comment; would you care to explain on the deletion page how it meets WP:BAND? — swpb T 18:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Good Times! (The Monkees album)
I really don't think many people agree with your policy on moving pages, if the amount of reverts of your moves over the years I've seen are anything to go by. Unless you can cite Wikipedia policies for why you move things, then it just seems to be your own personal preference. You moved Good Times! to Good Times! (The Monkees album) based on what? The fact that a 2009 non-notable autobiography exists under that title? Pages are moved by administrators (whose opinions I trust over users') at WP:RM/TR all the time because the less-disambiguated namespaces that have alternate meanings "are unlikely to be created [for another purpose], if at all" (that's what the admin uses in his edit summaries a lot). Considering I don't see Good Times! being created for a seven-year-old autobiography any time soon, it doesn't need to be redirected to a more-disambiguated title for no specified reason.  Ss 112  23:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, the existence of punctuation sufficiently disambiguates the title from other albums named "Good Times" that don't share the use of an exclamation mark in the title.  Ss 112  23:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The same goes for Kingsized (Dressy Bessy album). Is there even another thing titled Kingsized? Another album titled Kingsized? You immediately jumped to disambiguating by name and album. There's no grounds or reasons for moves like these.  Ss 112  23:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Copy of a message sent to Anthony Appleyard on this subject: "Hi, just wanted to ask you since you're an administrator who moves pages to requested namespaces quite a lot: reverted my months-old move of the Monkees album Good Times! to the disambiguated namespace Good Times! (The Monkees album), which I then undid citing your reasoning that the original title is unlikely to be created for anything else, if at all. Is this Wikipedia policy itself, is it based on WP:Notability, or is it just up to other users' personal preference whether they choose to disambiguate something unnecessarily? In ictu oculi and several other users seem to unnecessarily move pages because they think that punctuation isn't enough to separate the title from similar titles without the punctuation (in this instance, other albums with the title Good Times).  Ss  112  23:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry to User:Ss112, but I do not remember ever using the literal text "are unlikely to be created [for another purpose], if at all" in an edit summary. In my opinion, stray ornamental punctuation is not an adequate disambiguation; many people look for something whose name they remember or heard, rather than something whose name they have in print in front of them, and stray ornamental punctuation or other stylizing is likely to be forgotten or not known. About "Kingsized", I have seen or heard the word "kingsized" many times, often in advertisements for goods. Some may say that ambiguity between two items with very similar names is ambiguity, even if one of them is not described in Wikipedia. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, upon further inspection, it was SNUGGUMS who requested a move for Joanne (album) that you performed at WP:RM/TR, and said "No other album under this title warrants an article or is likely to anytime soon if at all". If that reasoning wasn't sound—as there are other albums titled "Joanne"—the move shouldn't have been performed, should it? Also, kingsized wasn't disambiguated to the actual size of an item—IIO merely redirected it to the more disambiguated namespace. That's pointless. If there was a concern that it meant kingsize, which has an article, then it should have been redirected there. As for Good Times!, as that is the correct namespace for the album, Good Times! (The Monkees album) redirects there, so anybody looking for the Monkees' album will then see with the exclamation mark is correct. There is no point moving and then redirecting the previous namespace of an album title, as if ambiguity exists over the previous namespace, then something should have been done with the previous namespace besides redirecting to the x ([artist] album) title.  Ss 112  05:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * This is about far more than the two I've listed here. As I pointed out, over the years I have seen IIO move hundreds of pages that have not needed to be moved at all, considering there would be very little ambiguity or confusion with quite unique namespaces, and if there was, it could surely be fixed with a hatnote or some other small feature. Besides, in one of these instances, why the jump from Kingsized to Kingsized (Dressy Bessy album)? Why not Kingsized (album)? Why not Good Times! (album), as there is no other album listed on Wikipedia as Good Times!?  Ss 112  05:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * By all means those should be just (album). I hadn't finished. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * "I hadn't finished" – you did plenty of things after moving Good Times! I don't know what that even means. You were going to create another redirect? Also, your talk page message to me, "Is this album in any way notable"? Firstly, please keep the discussion here and just ping me. Secondly, if it wasn't, why bother moving it at all? You must be assuming I care about it more than moving it to a namespace where no other notable thing exists.  Ss 112  07:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Because "no other notable thing exists" isn't correct is it? The album isn't notable; tt probably needs a prod on it. Wikipedia already contains other content for "Kingsized", quite apart from the basic meaning, beds. Really discussion needs to be on Talk:Kingsized. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * This was one example of a few of hundreds of unnecessary redirects you've made over the years. My message wasn't concerning whether the album is notable or not. Personally, and many other Wikipedia editors appear to agree, hence Joanne (album) being moved by AA and many other things requested at places like WP:RM/TR, is that if no other thing has an article or it is unlikely to be created, then there is no point unnecessarily disambiguating. If somebody else creates something under a very similar namespace, then the discussion/moves can be made. Until then, linking things like Good Times! to Good Times! (The Monkees album) when no other album exists with the punctuation intact is unnecessary.  Ss 112  07:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you please stop moving things to my talk page based on moves you're quoting to me? Thanks. Also, I don't see why I would have to discuss moves you have the issue with (and clearly nobody else since June has had an issue with). You should have taken it to the talk page before moving it again.  Ss 112  07:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but you removed (The Monkees album) from the album, and I reverted you, I have cited Rolling Stone on the article talk page. The conversation should be there Talk:Good Times!. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, and I just said, nobody else since June had an issue with the title being changed. I didn't have an "issue" per se, I saw nothing else was at Good Times! and thought an editor had unnecessarily disambiguated. You reverted, hence why I thought you "reverting" again should have been discussed. If you are implying I should have discussed this months ago, I see you hardly ever discuss moves you make, by moving albums to x ([artist] album), so I don't see that I should have been required to if you don't feel you are. To avoid a subsequent potential move war, after the initial move, it should then be discussed on the talk page. As I specified, the main point of this discussion or whatever it is is not this or the Kingsized example. it is one of many examples of unnecessary disambiguations you have made over the years, from what I have seen.  Ss 112  07:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Well your undiscussed move stands, you reverted my revert, and I'm graciously letting it be, so what is the problem? Please discuss on the article itself so that history related to the article stays in one place. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I have said this four or five times now, this isn't about one or two particular examples. I don't understand your reasoning for moving many things. Again, from what I have seen from glancing at your contributions, you hardly ever discuss moving things, so again, I don't see why this particular example would have required me to in June.  Ss 112  07:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yannis Maris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Matter of Life and Death. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Album covers
You suggested I upload an album cover for KT Tunstall's EP Golden State EP. I never upload album covers because I don't understand the legal issues with copying an image from Amazon or other found sites with album images. I don't know where to get guaranteed-free-of-restriction album images, so I just don't, and let other people do that at some point in the articles life. Mburrell (talk) 03:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roza Bal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siddhartha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case
I put you as the main subject of the ArbCom case request. I invite to discussion to write your statements in response to the request. --George Ho (talk) 04:28, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * This request for arbitration has been declined by the Committee (and withdrawn by the filer). For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 04:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&diff=prev&oldid=742957327 odd In ictu oculi (talk) 21:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Off the Wall (1983 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Cassidy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Derek May
Derek May is a wonderful find. Interesting, almost forgotten part of Montreal's art and cinema past. Good work! Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:43, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of China Power New Energy Development Company Limited


A tag has been placed on China Power New Energy Development Company Limited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Majora (talk) 02:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of China Power New Energy Development Company Limited for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article China Power New Energy Development Company Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/China Power New Energy Development Company Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Majora (talk) 21:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Waiting for Love (film).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Waiting for Love (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

User:George Ho and apparent collusion
I just want to let you know, I don't know what personal comments directed at you in edits or edit summaries you were referring to, and I have no idea why wrote "looks like you're on your own without me" on my talk page (although I assumed he meant that I was the only other editor he notified of the Arbitration request that actually wrote anything substantial on the request). I was aware of him, but have never talked to him before. If he stalked your edits to see who you had discussed things with or has some kind of grudge against you, that's news to me. I'm mostly only aware of your music page moves, and perhaps several others (I don't quite remember) after looking at your edit history after those times. I don't follow any user around, as I'm mostly off on my own path. If it's seemed like that, then I apologise, but that's not the case.  Ss 112  07:29, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The user edit comparison tool indicates that you are following me around. There are many other editors who disambiguate articles, you could try following them occasionally. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:31, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I've used that tool before to search random users who edit the same music articles as I do and it honestly could be used to show any kind of "stalking". I don't think that's definitive proof of anything, and as I just told you, I have looked at your edit history before after seeing various music-related moves you made and then based on that, edited/moved pages I saw had been moved, in my opinion, unnecessarily, but I don't "follow you".  Ss 112  07:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Joe Allen (restaurant)
 * added a link pointing to No Way to Treat a Lady


 * S.Aishwarya
 * added a link pointing to Sabha

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to Women in Food and Drink editathon
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lost in Your Love (Tony Hadley song).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Lost in Your Love (Tony Hadley song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Projects Parinamana
, thank you very much for adding wikiprojects to the page Parinamana. However, this is only a Buddhist concept, so I don't believe including it in the Hinduism Wikiproject would be warranted. Propose removing the template.--S Khemadhammo (talk) 18:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Montreux Festival
Hi, I noticed your edits/moves related to Montreux Festival. I think Montreux Festival should be a disambiguation page, listing both the festival and the Albert King album (instead of a plain redirect to the festival). Do you have any objection ? Fbergo (talk) 09:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * https://www.google.com/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=%22montreux+festival%22&num=10 wouldn't seem to support the need for that. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer granted
Hello In ictu oculi. Your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria.
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator.

You have been grandfathered to this group based on prior patrolling activity - the technical flag for the group will be added to your account after the next software update. You do not need to apply at WP:PERM. 20:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Zhao Weishan
Hello, In ictu oculi,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Zhao Weishan should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Zhao Weishan.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Abbottonian (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Ruloffs
Greetings, on the Dutch Wikipedia I made a large article about Bartholomeus Ruloffs. Maybe you can translate parts of it. One of the links (beeldbank) has a link to his portrait.Ceescamel (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of László Halmos


A tag has been placed on László Halmos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cbs527 (talk) 03:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Apologize (Ed Ames song).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Apologize (Ed Ames song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation redirects
I just wanted to tell you to be careful when you're moving articles to new names with parenthetical disambiguation (like Foo → Foo (album)). After the move, if there is a dab page involved, please don't change the target of the remaining redirect to be the dab page. This makes Foo point at Foo (disambiguation), which is backwards from what it should be: it has become a malplaced disambiguation page. These are listed by a bot for repair, and it often involves WP:RMT or even a full WP:RM. If you could take care of the RM at the time that you move the page, it would save time and effort for other editors. Thanks! — Gorthian (talk) 22:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

User group: New Page Reviewr
Hello.

Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed.

New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk. The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

Speedy deletion nomination of His Majesty's Sagbutts & Cornetts


A tag has been placed on His Majesty's Sagbutts & Cornetts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- GB fan 18:15, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter
Hello ,


 * Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action. If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
 * Second set of eyes

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation. Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
 * Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

Citing
Edit: I realize you may already know this with 127k edits under your belt but I've come across a few of your edits and corrected it

please do not leave "bare references".

Here's a tool that will bulk fix these, just paste the article name in. :) https://tools.wmflabs.org/refill/index.php

-- Jennica ✿ talk / contribs 13:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion
Hello, In ictu oculi. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --George Ho (talk) 06:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Hawaii Five-0
I invite you to the ongoing RfD discussion. --George Ho (talk) 19:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Mis Favoritas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mis Favoritas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mis Favoritas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

Category:Revolutionary martyrs has been nominated for discussion
Category:Revolutionary martyrs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BDD (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Talk:The Life & Adventures of Santa Claus (2000 film)
FWIW, the nominator at that move request has some sort of ban from either creating or editing redirects. I cannot remember which one, or if the ban is still in effect. Either way, they could have just placed an edit request on the redirect's talk page instead of starting a move request on a different page. (I don't think the ban included editing redirects' talk pages.) Steel1943  (talk) 22:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Just found the discussion. The ban looks permanent with no expiration date. Steel1943  (talk) 22:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand now, thanks for heads up In ictu oculi (talk) 08:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter #2
Hello ,


 * Please help reduce the New Page backlog 

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.


 * Getting the tools we need

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
 * Improve the tools: Vote here.
 * Reduce your review load: Vote here

Reference errors on 16 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Claudio Baglioni page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=755217200 your edit] caused an unsupported parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F755217200%7CClaudio Baglioni%5D%5D Ask for help])

Weija-Gbawe (Ghana parliament constituency)
It's in the RM backlog, and as you've already closed one of the duplicate RMs I thought it best to leave this one to you rather than getting up to speed on it myself... but happy to work on it if you have no time right now.

Best of the season. Andrewa (talk) 16:10, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Will do, and a Merry Christmas to you too! In ictu oculi (talk) 16:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 'Tis the Season (Vince Gill and Olivia Newton-John album)


A tag has been placed on 'Tis the Season (Vince Gill and Olivia Newton-John album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 'Tis the Season (Vince Gill and Olivia Newton-John album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 'Tis the Season (Vince Gill and Olivia Newton-John album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/'Tis the Season (Vince Gill and Olivia Newton-John album)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:45, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Tis the season
I withdrew my G4 and renominated it. Did you not notice that the Hit FM Radio link is just a Wikipedia mirror? I don't think the other sources are any good either. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

N.O.H.A.
I'm just letting you know that I've reverted the move you performed few hours ago as that was an undiscussed move. Request to revert the move was made at WP:RMT. Feel free to start RM discussion. Cheers. Fuortu (talk) 21:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * thanks for the ping, out of interest what do you yourself think about whether dots distinguish one acronym from another? Just curious. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Since there is no other article with the dots in acronym, I think it is a good disambiguator, and band is known for having dots in the acronym, so that is unlikely to be a problem for readers who are trying to find the article. A hatnote to the disambiguation page is enough, in my opinion. Fuortu (talk) 22:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, I don't see from sources that those dots are unique, but thanks for response. Happy New Year. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Happy new year :) Fuortu (talk) 22:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not entirely sure what you meant by "unique". There's one source in that article which uses the dots consistently throughout the article. And the Youtube videos of the band also have dots in the acronym. They may not be notable but they are known for having the dots in their name. As the other article doesn't have dots in its common name, it won't be a problem for the readers, who are used to seeing their names with or without dots, to find the article they are looking for. Even if they click on wrong article, there's a hatnote pointing to DAB page. Fuortu (talk) 16:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Fixer88. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Danava, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Fixer88 (talk) 23:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)