User talk:Juno

Nomination of Joe Biden presidential campaign, 2020 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Biden presidential campaign, 2020 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joe Biden presidential campaign, 2020 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 11:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:United States presidential Democratic Party campaigns, 2016 has been nominated for discussion
Category:United States presidential Democratic Party campaigns, 2016, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 01:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Down Among the Big Boys
Hello, Juno,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Down Among the Big Boys should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Down Among the Big Boys.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

signed,Rosguill talk 03:17, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2020 California Democratic primary


The article 2020 California Democratic primary has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Too early."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Viztor (talk) 06:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Tim Mynett for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Mynett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tim Mynett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:15, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Movieguide Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Norton ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Movieguide_Awards check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Movieguide_Awards?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

BLP violation
Do not make claims as you did here of criminal behavior without reliable sources per WP:BLP.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:45, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It was mentioned in the NYT source, among others. Juno (talk) 18:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * No source described him as fleeing, claimed "objective evidence" of such, or even being suspected of burglary at the construction site that day. (   )  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 20:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Monuments_and_memorials_removed_during_the_George_Floyd_protests check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Monuments_and_memorials_removed_during_the_George_Floyd_protests?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone


The article Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not backed up by reliable, established sources. WP:TOOSOON to have a separate article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Sounder Bruce  02:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sounder Bruce  04:38, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone


The article Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The zone is part of the USA and it's a blatant antifa, anarchist, communist attempt to capitalize on George's Floyd murder. This movement has no legitimity and this article doesn't belong to wikipedia. It's not a state, it's a zone hijacked by anarchists."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RafaelS1979 (talk) 02:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020 establishments in Tennessee


A tag has been placed on Category:2020 establishments in Tennessee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Protests in Nashville


A tag has been placed on Category:Protests in Nashville requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Yahya Muslim for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yahya Muslim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yahya Muslim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  02:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Murder of Vicha Ratanapakdee
Thank you for creating the article on Murder of Vicha Ratanapakdee. It is an important topic, and I have nominated it for DYK as part of Template:Did you know nominations/Stop AAPI Hate. If there is any further expansion that you believe is appropriate, it would be great if it could be done before the article is featured on the Main Page. Cheers. Cbl62 (talk) 19:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

BLP and crime articles
Because I needed to redact details in an article you wrote, Murder of Ee Lee, following a discussion at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard and because another editor earlier raised an issue about BLP related to a discussion about crime, I feel you need to re-read WP:BLPCRIME. Although you may rightly feel strongly about the cases you're writing about, we need to be aware of the presumption of innocence, i.e. not using wording that suggests guilt ahead of a verdict, and avoiding including details of non-public figures unless necessary. Fences &amp;  Windows  14:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Stop AAPI Hate
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

This is my first DYK! I will be watching the page views. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 17:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Murder of Vicha Ratanapakdee
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations
Your DYK hook about Killing of Vicha Ratanapakdee and Stop AAPI Hate drew 10,058 combined page views (838 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of March as shown at Did you know/Statistics. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 18:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Daunte Wright riots for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daunte Wright riots, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Daunte Wright riots until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Biden administration controversies


A tag has been placed on Category:Biden administration controversies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Stand-Down to Address Extremism in the Ranks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stand-Down to Address Extremism in the Ranks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stand-Down to Address Extremism in the Ranks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cliffmore (talk) 22:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dustin Burrows, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Eleanor Seigler for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eleanor Seigler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eleanor Seigler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Broccoli &#38; Coffee  (Oh hai) 16:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Nathan Edmondson
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Nathan Edmondson, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the portion of your edit in which you added mention of EcoDefense Group had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. I know you don't edit here that often, but you've accumulated over 2,000 edits since 2009, and should know by now that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 16:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 09:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Unsourced edit at your article Timeline of Jane's Revenge attacks
We are very careful about using the word "terrorist". Normally we rely on government statements, not the media and certainly never our own opinions. Doug Weller talk 09:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Sean D Cleary moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Sean D Cleary, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 02:16, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Sean D Cleary for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean D Cleary, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Sean D Cleary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Rosa Parks Day into Transit Equality Day. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sean D Cleary
Hello, Juno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sean D Cleary, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Peruvian mercenaries


A tag has been placed on Category:Peruvian mercenaries indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sean D Cleary


Hello, Juno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sean D Cleary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to St. Louis Reparations Commission, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
 * If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
 * If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. — Diannaa (talk) 15:44, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hunter Biden laptop controversy into Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Emails. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Rebecca Weber
Hello Juno, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Rebecca Weber, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Rebecca Weber.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Chicago Commission on Restoration and Reparations moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Chicago Commission on Restoration and Reparations. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Olivia May for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olivia May is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Olivia May until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chicago Commission on Restoration and Reparations


Hello, Juno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chicago Commission on Restoration and Reparations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  04:24, 17 July 2024 (UTC)