User talk:Maymichael2

Director Kevin Lima, for the film "Enchanted", also did the voice of "Pip" when the character was in New York. FYI.

Greg Chandler Maness
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Greg Chandler Maness, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2976887/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mitchell Hope (Actor)
Hello, Maymichael2. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mitchell Hope (Actor), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Mitchell Hope (Actor) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, MaxineBangs (talk) 16:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Greg Chandler Maness


A tag has been placed on Greg Chandler Maness, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2976887/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

O.K. I'm sorry for doing those things! You can delete them, I don't know how to!

Please review
Please review WP:HONORIFIC and WP:ENGVAR. Many of your edits are against the Manual of Style and will be reverted. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 23:46, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

I am truly sorry for that! (talk) 23:46, 1 November 2014 (UTC)


 * You continue to disregard these policies. This is disruptive editing and I ask you again to stop. You are only creating work for editors who have better things to do than repeatedly clean up after you.  Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

I apologize deeply! Maymichael2 (talk) 01:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)


 * If it makes any difference, I'm gonna be off-line for a while! Maymichael2 (talk) 02:57, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Edit summaries, multiple consecutive edits
Hello, Maymichael2. Here are a couple of general editing suggestions for you to consider: Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric talk 02:37, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Please make a habit of providing an edit summary when you make a change to an article. Doing so makes it easier for your colleagues here to understand the intention of your edit.
 * Plus, it will be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits in rapid succession on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. This keeps the page history of the article less cluttered.

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File talk:Royal Arms of England (1154-1189).svg


A tag has been placed on File talk:Royal Arms of England (1154-1189).svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I do not know to delete it! Maymichael2 (talk) 00:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for evading a previous block on IP 24.22.40.195. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DrKay (talk) 08:11, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Just a heads up: He also uses the IP 67.171.217.5 -- see here.  Thanks, Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 13:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cause and Effect (Robin Hood), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lost in Translation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
You were asked by more than one editor at User talk:24.22.40.195 to stop adding "King" and "Queen" etc. to article text. You have ignored those comments and continued with those edits, despite a current block and despite being told you need to discuss contentious edits. I have consequently blocked you for the same duration as your IP sock. DrKay (talk) 21:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I have "for sure" moved on from that "King" and "Queen" thing. Maymichael2 (talk) 16:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Apparently not. Please stop once again. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry. Maymichael2 (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disney's Descendants: Wicked World, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Belle and Beast. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of I Am... Gabriel


A tag has been placed on I Am... Gabriel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2040608/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dogsix (talk) 23:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Your addition to I Am... Gabriel has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 23:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

April 2017
Your addition to Guinevere Jones has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. '' — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Thibbs. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Felix the Cat: The Movie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please also see WP:KIDSTVDATES. -Thibbs (talk) 04:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Precious Moments: Timmy's Gift


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Precious Moments: Timmy's Gift requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐁT₳LKᐃ  21:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jessie-Ann Friend
Hello Maymichael2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jessie-Ann Friend for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Snickers2686 (talk) 02:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Treasure of Pirate's Point (1999 film)


A tag has been placed on Treasure of Pirate's Point (1999 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from imdb.com/title/tt0189158. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ  21:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Savage Land (1994)
Hello, Maymichael2,

Thank you for creating Savage Land (1994).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 00:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of I Am... Gabriel


The article I Am... Gabriel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, nothing found to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged since 2020."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard the Lionheart: Rebellion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard the Lionheart: Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard the Lionheart: Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Film Creator (talk) 07:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Guinevere Jones episodes


A tag has been placed on List of Guinevere Jones episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.australiantelevision.net/guinevere-jones/episodes.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 04:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pendragon (TV series)


The article Pendragon (TV series) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A planned TV show that was never made; as far as I can tell there are no independent sources beyond the IMDB page to indicate notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andrew Gray (talk) 21:12, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. You mustn't edit in the same topic area as this account and as the IP Special:Contributions/73.96.9.160. DrKay (talk) 05:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Piped links
Please remember, as detailed elsewhere, changing redirected links to piped links is deprecated because it almost never serves any useful purpose. Thanks. DrKay (talk) 16:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You have been blocked temporarily because despite multiple requests not to add piped links, you're still doing so. Continuing with a series of edits after being asked to stop is Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: . However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DrKay (talk) 06:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Charles III
Howdy. Your 2022 image of King Charles III, is on the verge of being deleted, across several pages. GoodDay (talk) 02:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN
Hello, can you please read WP:NOTBROKEN? The main idea is that adding "pipe links" to avoid redirects generally shouldn't be done (with a few exceptions). (Put another way, the guideline says it is usually better to leave a wikilink as King Charles III instead of trying to fix it to say King Charles III .) Accordingly, your recent edits here and here are not necessary. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 09:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely because despite multiple explanations, warnings and blocks, you are continuing with the same series of edits, e.g., despite being asked to stop. Continuing with a series of edits after being asked to stop is disruptive. DrKay (talk) 09:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)