User talk:Memevietnam98

Welcome!
  Hello, Memevietnam98!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, —asparagusus   (interaction)  sprouts!  14:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello @Memevietnam98. I'd like to apologize for reverting your edit to your sandbox. I mistook it for an edit to the actual article. Sorry! —asparagusus   (interaction)  sprouts!  14:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, no problem. Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Wisconsin Democratic presidential primary has been accepted
 2024 Wisconsin Democratic presidential primary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=2024_Wisconsin_Democratic_presidential_primary help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Memevietnam98 (talk) 07:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Moved contents from your User page
Hi Memevietnam98, I moved the contents from your User page to User:Memevietnam98/2024 Florida Democratic presidential primary per WP:FAKEARTICLE. You can learn more about creating User subpages here, creating drafts here and about moving pages here. No worries but your main User page is really for writing about your interests and activities as a Wikipedia editor. S0091 (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you, I appreciate for that! Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you don't mind, may I ask how to paint parts of the county pieces? (for example: this image.)
 * South Carolina Presidential Election Results 2020.svg Memevietnam98 (talk) 11:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Alaska Democratic presidential primary has been accepted
 2024 Alaska Democratic presidential primary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=2024_Alaska_Democratic_presidential_primary help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your announcement! I'm very happy and appreciate for that! Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from International Women's Day into Draft:Criticism of International Women's Day. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I apologize for being copied without asking for copyright. Memevietnam98 (talk) 04:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Criticism of International Women's Day (March 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Criticism of International Women's Day may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Memevietnam98 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Guessitsavis&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Memevietnam98 reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 19:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Okay, I accept. Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Your edit to Draft:Criticism of International Women's Day has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 20:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Memevietnam98! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at TikTok that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. QuietCicada chirp 17:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you, I'll notice Memevietnam98 (talk) 01:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Wrong part. Memevietnam98 (talk) 07:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Barrack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreigner. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Owen Lloyd (swimmer) (March 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Owen Lloyd (swimmer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Owen_Lloyd_(swimmer) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Owen_Lloyd_(swimmer) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 13:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Memevietnam98 (talk) 15:16, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:2024 Facebook outage has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2024 Facebook outage. Thanks! TLA tlak 12:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * thank. Memevietnam98 (talk) 13:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Facebook outage (March 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 Facebook outage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:2024_Facebook_outage Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wikishovel&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:2024_Facebook_outage reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Facebook outage (March 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 Facebook outage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:2024_Facebook_outage Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pbritti&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:2024_Facebook_outage reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 15:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Backrooms (Found Footage) (March 22)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WindTempos was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Backrooms (Found Footage) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Backrooms_(Found_Footage) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WindTempos&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Backrooms_(Found_Footage) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WindTempos (talk • contribs) 20:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)


 * You doesn't know my means. This article is independent than, and this is more information than the main, so I can go back and resubmit. Memevietnam98 (talk) 00:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Backrooms (Found Footage) (March 23)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrowssapSMM was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Backrooms (Found Footage) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Backrooms_(Found_Footage) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DrowssapSMM&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Backrooms_(Found_Footage) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drowssap SMM  01:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Again? My article page is actually independent from that, uh I mean you're not read all about that, there are many sources that doesn't belong from the main, so I'll resubmit about that. Memevietnam98 (talk) 01:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi there! I think you might misunderstand the reason for the rejection. The proposed article and that article are about the same subject matter. It does not matter that your draft has more details on the Backrooms series - the article in the mainspace has, in my opinion, the correct title, and has been created earlier, so is a more appropriate source. In that case, you might like to improve that article using some of the information and sources you have drafted. This can be a bit disappointing but I'm sure some of the information you have looked into may help improve the article. Happy to chat if there's any confusion. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I have three lines:
 * I have another sources that doesn't belong from the main
 * I have clearly plot.
 * At video games part, that's actually me did.
 * I accept that a lot of sources are from the Backrooms (web series) but compare to my lines, the article should be exist. Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Respectfully but firmly: there is already an article for this, and there is no reason to create a new article when one already exists. It doesn't matter that you have drafted an article with more details. You can put those details in the existing article if you like. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 03:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Because my article is more sources than, the sources from Backrooms (web series) is just like "a half"??? Memevietnam98 (talk) 03:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Backrooms (Found Footage) (March 23)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Backrooms (Found Footage) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Backrooms_(Found_Footage) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vrxces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Backrooms_(Found_Footage) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I have three lines:
 * I have another sources that doesn't belong from the main
 * I have clearly plot.
 * At video games part, that's actually me did.
 * I accept that a lot of sources are from the Backrooms (web series) but compare to my lines, the article should be exist. Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Backrooms (Found Footage) (March 24)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Backrooms (Found Footage) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Backrooms_(Found_Footage) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vrxces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Backrooms_(Found_Footage) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 03:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Ahh hell nah do you even read my description before???
 * I have another sources that doesn't belong from the main
 * I have clearly plot.
 * At video games part, that's actually me did.
 * There are many sources and something else doesn't showed in Backrooms (web series) (actually I don't copy all) Memevietnam98 (talk) 03:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that you are unwilling or unable to understand the reason these are being rejected. It has nothing to do with the content of your draft or its relationship to the other article: it is that there is already an article that exists, making the point of making a new article inappropriate. All the best. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * "An article", it is not "fully" at all. So why?
 * "inappropriate" well, I hope this is a joke, like I "can't" add informations in that page Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You would said that "you actually copied it" well, it should be used as "a half of information" because actually if you look again you will see the difference. Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm concerned that your attitude to this or maybe a potential language barrier between us is making it really hard to explain to you basic Wikipedia policy. Of course I think what you're doing is helpful, but you need to be able to listen to constructive criticism when multiple people are telling you that how you're going about it is not the best way to do things. You may keep running into roadblocks time and time again if you're not open to understanding how policies work. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll make political article. These film articles just making us divorce. Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I mean divide, lol I just used "divorce" Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Also solve me this article Memevietnam98 (talk) 12:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * answer me? Memevietnam98 (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Film Theorists (March 24)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Shewasafairy were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Film Theorists and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Film_Theorists Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shewasafairy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Film_Theorists reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

She was a fairy 04:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)


 * There are less news or information (or even no information) about The Film Theorists, so I rather took from the main channel. During my research, I just saw The Game Theorists news. Memevietnam98 (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Warning you about resubmitting drafts
I have noticed that you have on numerous occasions resubmitted Draft:The Backrooms (Found Footage) right after it being declined without improving it. I wanted to warn you that doing this will not give the article a better chance of being accepted, and will in fact make the article more likely to be deleted. (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 07:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)


 * After 5 submitted, there are many changes, including:
 * "Continues part"
 * Awards
 * Infobox television
 * Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Film Theorists (March 24)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Film Theorists and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Film_Theorists Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Utopes&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Film_Theorists reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes (talk / cont) 07:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Number 1: No web site, no source, YouTube was the place The Film Theories created.
 * Number 2: Seriously, I have watched all of that and I can confirm.
 * Number 3: "No change since previous submission." My change since previous was: Episodes part, Format (minor edit)
 * Number 4: "Youtube is not a reliable source; there is honestly zero reason to be using Youtube as a reference here.", as my lines, "YouTube was the place The Film Theories created.", do you actually watched all The Film Theorist' videos?
 * Number 5: "Independent notability has not been established from the minimal references outside of the self-published videos present in the article." actually I'm inspired by MatPat so why not? Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It just like ERB, the channel was made in YouTube, and the sources of channel must also get from YouTube channel, so "honestly zero reason to be using Youtube as a reference here" is meaningless. Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * In order for a topic to be notable enough to constitute an article, it must be extensively covered in reliable secondary sources such as news articles and the such. As the reviewer stated, reliable secondary sources independent of the subject were not used. (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * My sources is only IMDb 💀 Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Backrooms (Found Footage) (March 24)
<div style="border: solid 1px #F99; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Backrooms_(Found_Footage) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Utopes was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Backrooms (web series) already exists. This has been repeated five times now, and at this point is just getting resubmitted with no changes from the previous versions.

Utopes (talk / cont) 07:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I knew, that's why I have resubmitted over 5 times!
 * After 5 submitted, there are many changes, including:
 * "Continues part"
 * Awards
 * Infobox television
 * Okay? Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I believe that you have not search history, I hope. Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Content does not determine notability, only sources can establish notability so you can add as many sections, etc. as you want but it will not help without qualifying sources. Almost all the reliable sources were largely, if not entirely, about the series so notability was not met for The Backrooms (Found Footage). Please also be aware of WP:NOPAGE.  Sometimes even when an article meets nobility, readers may be better served by the relevant content being included in an existing article rather it having its own article.  S0091 (talk) 14:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * S0091? Is that you?
 * Also okay. Memevietnam98 (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Yep, I'm S0091. S0091 (talk) 15:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Granny (2017 horror video game) (March 25)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Granny (2017 horror video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Granny_(2017_horror_video_game) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Granny_(2017_horror_video_game) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)


 * You need "reliable sources" right? then check References and External links again.
 * You need to check what "reliable sources" means, it's mean how it believable to be appear in a article.
 * I was taken from DVloper's Twitter account, Google Play, Instagram
 * And about plot? I have watched YouTube videos, my experiences and fandom.
 * "This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
 * in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
 * reliable
 * secondary
 * independent of the subject"
 * 1. I actually made it "in-depth", uh it's that your problem?
 * 2. "reliable" I explained in the above.
 * 3. "secondary" my article is actually secondary in actual meaning.
 * 4. "independent"??? I don't understand. This article is actually independent, uhh maybe I don't understand your problems' Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It's a generic response, the criteria they are referring to is about reliability. Reliable sources aren't wherever a game is mentioned by someone online, but been covered by a generally accepted mainstream source with an editorial process. You can find a list of the kind of secondary video game sources that we think are reliable at WP:VG/S. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 19:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Your comment is easy to explain
 * First, YouTube doesn't mean it is a fake sources.
 * Two, I'm taking this from the main developer.
 * Three, there's a news. And references.
 * Four, I took this from the place where the game was released. Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I am really sorry but I think this is just going to keep happening for you. All the best. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you hate me, say one word. Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Granny (2017 horror video game) has a new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Granny (2017 horror video game). Thanks! S0091 (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Granny (2017 horror video game) (March 26)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrowssapSMM was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Granny (2017 horror video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Granny_(2017_horror_video_game) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DrowssapSMM&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Granny_(2017_horror_video_game) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drowssap SMM  20:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Actually the "Almost none of this is supported by reliable sources." is meaningless, let's me explain
 * One: there are actually RELIABLE SOURCES, check the references again if you wants.
 * Two: I met the requirements: it is a stand-alone article, as well as secondary and in-depth Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Granny (2017 horror video game) (March 27)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Granny (2017 horror video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Granny_(2017_horror_video_game) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vrxces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Granny_(2017_horror_video_game) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I'm not gonna debate with you more, you're very conservative. Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Granny (2017 horror video game) (March 29)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Granny (2017 horror video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Granny_(2017_horror_video_game) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vrxces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Granny_(2017_horror_video_game) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 00:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Did you said Times Now "a tabloid of dubious reliability"??? Wow at this point I definitely you are hating on me, says Times Now a tabloid is definitely bullshit and no evidence.
 * "The article still has the obvious and fundamental root problem of lacking any reviews from reliable sources, suggesting the game, for all its various appearances in random sources"
 * Check the "Development and release" and "Reception" part again if you wants. Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not surprised again when you actually refused my article 2 times. Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Most of the sources are either primary and/or not reliable, such as Google Play, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Ask.com, Amazon, and blogs. User-reviews should not be used, only critics, including Metacritic.  I suggest removing those sources and rewriting it summarizing what reliable sources have written about the game and be mindful of original research/WP:SYNTH.  You cannot say things like "In 2018, the game became a big trend, when many people started playing, making fandom, especially on YouTube when where there are a lot of players." unless it is supported by secondary reliable sources.  If no secondary reliable sources have not written about something, it does not warrant mentioning. S0091 (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't, here's why
 * 1. User experience is random and "real"
 * 2. Did you said "Google Play, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Ask.com, Amazon and blog" aren't reliability??? this is such a joke, I swear, Google Play is the place the game released, the place where the users can install and play, rating??? And YouTube is the place where its popularity went high, Instagram also I used for developer's, Ask.com is the place of critical game, Amazon are the same, thank you for Metacritic guess.
 * 3. "You cannot say things like "In 2018, the game became a big trend, when many people started playing, making fandom, especially on YouTube when where there are a lot of players." unless it is supported by secondary reliable sources. If no secondary reliable sources have not written about something, it does not warrant mentioning", ok, you get a point but actually I can put it into the main top, if you continue to say it is non-reliable sources, just debate again. Memevietnam98 (talk) 15:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You can disagree with it, but the community has already come to consensus on these type of sources: see user-generated content and WP:RSPYT. There is no debate to be had. While primary sources, which includes self-published sources, can be used (i.e. DVlope's YouTube channel), they should only be used very sparingly and very carefully.  Continuing to resubmit the draft without addressing the issues, is considered disruptive and may result in the draft being rejected, meaning it will no longer be considered.  S0091 (talk) 15:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I have watched WP:RSPYT and I saw that it used to said "most of", so the sources from YouTube actually can use in this case, also it said that "Content uploaded from a verified official account, such as that of a news organization, may be treated as originating from the uploader and therefore inheriting their level of reliability." which is true in this case, from DVloper.
 * "they should only be used very sparingly and very carefully", I agree with this, but I get more from Twitter sources than YouTube. Memevietnam98 (talk) 05:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Granny (2017 horror video game) (March 29)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Granny (2017 horror video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Granny_(2017_horror_video_game) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Granny_(2017_horror_video_game) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Oh yeah I'm really not surprised again when you allied with Vrxces to rejects my draft again. I do not need to debate with this one. Memevietnam98 (talk) 05:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Granny (2017 horror video game) (March 30)
<div style="border: solid 1px #F99; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Granny_(2017_horror_video_game) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Vrxces was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Article creator has continually resubmitted the article without substantive improvements to the concerns that several editors have raised about sourcing quality and notability. These concerns have also been discussed on the talk page in a way that the creator has consistently misunderstood or misrepresented. The article is at a state where due to the creator's approach and continual resubmission it is unlikely to reach a point of notability. I would strongly encourage the editor to gain greater familiarity with the standards around WP:GNG and WP:RS and what these mean in practice before drafting and submitting another article about media to avoid issues in future.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * You're very conservative, super conservative, just like Donald Trump, "Article creator has continually resubmitted the article without substantive improvements to the concerns that several editors have raised about sourcing quality and notability"??? this is such a joke, I'm confused when you're doing this with anyone, I hope the person who met you in Wikipedia be fine and not be crazy not like me. "contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia." read the rules again, buddy.
 * "These concerns have also been discussed on the talk page in a way that the creator has consistently misunderstood or misrepresented" This is what you're doing, you're never heard, never see the explain, reject with conservative and the message is just as same as, you're hating on me (with no reason) and rejected me 3 times with SAME REASONS.
 * You have never said you're hating me, but I'll not debate as a Wikipedia editor, I have read some rules and reflect my article, it is suitable for an article and two both (you and S0091) allied and tried to fucked up my article, this is unfair, UNFAIR ENOUGH. Memevietnam98 (talk) 08:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry that you feel upset about the closure of this article. Four separate editors have rejected the article for the same reason because the article has not rectified the consistent issue that there is no reliable coverage or reviews from sources like those discussed at WP:VG/S. Unfortunately the edits made to the article did not adjust this issue, and the article has not come closer to notability. It is a shame that we have not been able to come to an understanding but this is not from a place of malice or wanting to obstruct your efforts. I hope you are able to make other constructive edits to Wikipedia and in time create articles consistent with the rules around notability and reliability, but at this point there is a lot of work and understanding that needs to be done to get there. I understand you are upset but the accusations that I am doing this to hurt you or attack your article are not the case. I think that's about all I can say on this. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:52, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * "Four separate editors" you meant your four allies? I have mad at this one, closure of article for random reason is actually BULLSHIT! Yeah! I'm serious! I even edited parts that aren't even "minors" like you're hyping... Memevietnam98 (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Literally closed to an article just showed contempt for the creator. Memevietnam98 (talk) 13:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Vrxces, if you are already for an actual debate, open the article submission if you're not a conservative. Memevietnam98 (talk) 13:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * There is no debate and the article has been rejected. I think for your benefit and mine it's time to move on. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 20:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Say something meaningful bro. Memevietnam98 (talk) 07:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Fine, I'll not doing anything about that article, but I'm still raging, it's simple. Memevietnam98 (talk) 07:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok. Please remember to consider taking another look at WP:GNG and WP:RS when creating new pages to avoid this issue in future. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Fine, I'll listen to your announcement, I'll not doing this in the future. Thank you. Memevietnam98 (talk) 14:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1984 Maine Democratic presidential caucuses has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 1984 Maine Democratic presidential caucuses, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=1984_Maine_Democratic_presidential_caucuses help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 15:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you, I'll try to improve another articles. Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1980 New Hampshire Democratic presidential primary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for creating the article for the 2004 North Dakota Republican presidential caucuses! Keep up the good work :) WikiBunny2K1 (talk) 13:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Then solve this page Memevietnam98 (talk) 14:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * My advice? Just publish it. Don’t go through the review process. All of my primary presidential articles never went through that yet they’re still up. WikiBunny2K1 (talk) 21:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay. Memevietnam98 (talk) 01:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Memevietnam98. Thank you for your work on 2004 Wisconsin Republican presidential primary. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   03:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Who are you? Please describe your personal Wikipedia. Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Could you rephrase your question? I didn't understand your question. Thank you. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   18:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't know who you are so describe who are you in Wikipedia. Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I do think think that it is not important. If you want to see things about me you can see my user page. And per your question on other talk page, I didn't care that you are a communist. Have a good day. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   12:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Toxic feminism (Internet affects) has a new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Toxic feminism (Internet affects). Thanks! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks, but I'm sorry, I'll not submit this draft, I'm sorry. Memevietnam98 (talk) 11:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * This isn't an article rejection! Just a heads up that it may be helpful to review these policies before submission to avoid issues. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Would you reject it? I'm confusing. Memevietnam98 (talk) 11:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I do not plan on reviewing AfC articles outside my area of interest or experience, but yes, I would consider if this article were submitted for AfC, it would be declined (not rejected) on the basis of WP:NPOV and WP:RS. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Reject = decline (they're not same meaning)
 * Do not try to denying that you would reject and then do it like what you have done in Granny article. Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * No worries, as said above, I don't plan on reviewing the article if submitted. Take from it what you will! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If you want, thank you. Memevietnam98 (talk) 11:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2024 Alaska Democratic presidential caucuses for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Alaska Democratic presidential caucuses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2024 Alaska Democratic presidential caucuses until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Esolo5002 (talk) 16:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The article was ended, that's okay. Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A CN (YouTuber) (April 18)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A CN (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:A_CN_(YouTuber) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:A_CN_(YouTuber) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * "User-generated sources"?? all of those sources from the article didn't user-generated! did you meant this page right? ok now let me explain.
 * 1. This page contains information images of the YouTube channel, which is considered a reliable source, see Reliable source examples.
 * 2. Even though it's a fandom, it has the most basic information a YouTube channel needs to have.
 * If you want to understand more, see Reliable sources, thank you! Memevietnam98 (talk) 11:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Check a few sections down from the link you provided at WP:USERG to see what this user is discussing. They are referring to most of the sources in the article, including the YouTube and podcast sources. YouTube is not considered a reliable source as your link states unless it is affiliated with the official channel of a reliable organisation or news source. They are trying to help you by pointing you in the direction of adding secondary sources to the article, like reliable news sources. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Not your lines 💀, you know I have tired because of your endless lines and you're not able to understand it. Memevietnam98 (talk) 14:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A CN (YouTuber) (April 18)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A CN (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:A_CN_(YouTuber) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vrxces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:A_CN_(YouTuber) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I'm not tryna debate you again, you're not able to understand, anyways, stop expanding fake information like that. Memevietnam98 (talk) 14:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I mean you're not able to know what is a "user generated" means and would try to lock my article as same as Granny before, I have prepared about that. Memevietnam98 (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Wait a minute, looks like I have to do something new... looks like "User-generated content" is real... Memevietnam98 (talk) 14:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I have resubmitted again, removed some "unneccessary" links according to you, but I didn't remove citation like YouTube, Discord, Podcast because simply it's important personal information. If you continue to say that it's "not a reliable source", I'm afraid you'll have to look at Reliable sources again. Memevietnam98 (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Glad we got there eventually. Well no, you don't have to necessarily remove primary sources (these are the ones by the subject) but you do have to find enough reliable news or secondary sources that are written by a journalist or someone credible to show that the person is notable enough to have an article about them. The article you wrote about the lady in the iron lung was notable because there were plenty of news stories about her. Is this the case here? ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 20:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Lol you just showed how stalk are you to me. Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry you see it that way. Anyway, if you want that article to progress, I'd see if you could find mainstream coverage of that YouTube user. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 10:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It is similar to CoryxKenshin. Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Not quite, because the sources are mainstream: Kotaku, LA Times, IGN and The Verge. These are reliable sources listed in WP:RS and WP:VG/S. Does that sort of coverage apply to the user in your article? ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 10:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't think it is already to put in the article. Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Also please explain why Daily Mail has been banned in Wikipedia. Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * See here. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A CN (YouTuber) (April 18)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A CN (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:A_CN_(YouTuber) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pbrks&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:A_CN_(YouTuber) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Pbrks ( t·c ) 15:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2012 Texas Republican presidential primary has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 2012 Texas Republican presidential primary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=2012_Texas_Republican_presidential_primary help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Memevietnam98 (talk) 09:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of John Davis Jr. (presidential candidate) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Davis Jr. (presidential candidate) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Davis Jr. (presidential candidate) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. AusLondonder (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jimmy Carter 1980 presidential campaign has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Jimmy Carter 1980 presidential campaign, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Jimmy_Carter_1980_presidential_campaign help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! (talk | contribs) 13:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Memevietnam98 (talk) 13:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * No problem. Keep up the good work!  (talk | contribs) 13:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Squid Game vs. MrBeast (video)


A tag has been placed on Squid Game vs. MrBeast (video) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 15:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Okay. Memevietnam98 (talk) 01:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Max Werenka


The article Max Werenka has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:BLP1E"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1984 Illinois Republican presidential primary (May 4)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1984 Illinois Republican presidential primary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:1984_Illinois_Republican_presidential_primary Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:1984_Illinois_Republican_presidential_primary reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Yeah because I can't move the article due to a redirect page existed before. Memevietnam98 (talk) 14:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Max Werenka for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Max Werenka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Max Werenka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Fram (talk) 15:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about List of dictators supported by the United States
Hello Memevietnam98, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of dictators supported by the United States, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/List of dictators supported by the United States.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 01:36, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Attempted disqualification of Donald Trump (May 18)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taking Out The Trash was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Attempted disqualification of Donald Trump and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Attempted_disqualification_of_Donald_Trump Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Taking_Out_The_Trash&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Attempted_disqualification_of_Donald_Trump reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spence Monroe (May 20)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spence Monroe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Spence_Monroe Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ingenuity&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Spence_Monroe reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 03:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spence Monroe (May 20)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spence Monroe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Spence_Monroe Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qcne&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Spence_Monroe reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Qcne  (talk)  11:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


 * By this mile, then do you know who was Samuel Polk? Just because it don't get any notable doesn't mean it shouldn't be on. Don't try to put WP:NP again when some person who don't get attention still in some articles. Memevietnam98 (talk) 11:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @Memevietnam98. Notability is not inherited. How have you proven notability for this person using your sources?  Qcne  (talk)  12:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * "My sources"???, I took this from worldwide sources, not from mine?? I can prove that he was the father of a U.S. president, like Samuel Polk of James K. Polk, also he was appeared in some news, even |his son's ancestry news. That's it, if you don't know about him, then there are still some people knows about him, even in our Wikipedia now. Memevietnam98 (talk) 13:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi again @Memevietnam98. Sorry, I think you have misunderstood me. Sorry if I was not clear. I should have phrased it as the sources you have used do not show notability. I agree that Spence Monroe is the father of James Monroe- that fact is not in dispute. But just because he is the father of a U.S. President does not make him notable by himself. We would need to see significant coverage in reliable sources of Spence independently of James.
 * Hope that helps.  Qcne  (talk)  13:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, then prove a source that is not notability? I used the sources that is secondary and clearly, as I said, if that applies, then why Samuel Polk article is still exist (sorry if I mentioned for 3 times, but I should do that)? I even make a external links part of it, so don't say it non-reliable sources again. Memevietnam98 (talk) 13:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @Memevietnam98. The fact you put External Links has no bearing on the notability of sources. Let's go through your sources one by one so you can understand:
 * monroefoundation.org: This source talks about his land, but does not convey much information.
 * biography.com: This mentions Spence once, briefly. No significant coverage or any other information.
 * newspapers.com: This references his wife, but doesn't convey much information.
 * monroenews: This mentions Spence once, briefly. No significant coverage or any other information.
 * millercenter.org: This mentions Spence once, briefly. No significant coverage or any other information.
 * highland.org: This mentions Spence once, briefly. No significant coverage or any other information.
 * thoughtco.com: This mentions Spence once, briefly. No significant coverage or any other information.
 * libraries.psu.edu: This mentions Spence twice! But is still not significant coverage.
 * geni.com: This is a database entry and we usually do not use geni.com as it is considered a generally unreliable source.
 * I hope you agree, therefore, that although most of the sources are reliable and secondary they do not provide significant coverage of Spence. As such you have not proven he is notable by the notability standards for people.
 * We review articles on their own merit and do not compare to existing articles. There are unfortunately many tens of thousands of poor quality articles on Wikipedia. I have had a look at the Samuel Polk article, and to be honest I would not have accepted it either.
 * I don't think English is your first language, and I wonder if you might be better served improving your native-tongue Wikipedia project? I notice you have had some issues submitting articles in the past.
 * Let me know if you have questions.  Qcne  (talk)  13:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Wow, I just now realized that you use people who are having difficulty with English as a tool to argue and "bully", anyways, if Samuel Polk was already up there, then this article should be too. so (for sure), the third thing in the source you mentioned IS RELATED TO HIM, if you read it from beginning to end, you will see. And you keep repeating, "This mentions Spence once, briefly. No significant coverage or any other information." in most of your sentences, do you mean "not trustworthy enough"? And fortunately, these two things helped me avoid this trouble: Notability (people), Notability (people), you can watch it. Memevietnam98 (talk) 14:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you're right, looking at my name is enough for you to understand, but don't use my shortcomings to make something considered "debate" on Wikipedia. Memevietnam98 (talk) 14:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @Memevietnam98. I am really sorry if you feel bullied - I am merely pointing out that you seem to have had some issues understanding Wikipedia's very complex policies and guidelines.
 * As I mentioned before, we evaluate drafts on their own merit and do not compare them to existing articles. There is even a guideline for this here.
 * I specifically never said the sources were not trustworthy enough: I said they did not provide significant coverage. Please do not put words in my mouth.
 * I hope you agree that your draft does not actually meet any of the criteria you linked?  Qcne  (talk)  14:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Alternatively, if you feel I have made some sort of gross error here: please do give me three sources that you think meet WP:BASIC and prove that Spence meets the following critiera:
 * - "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."  Qcne  (talk)  14:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * First: I have achieved independence (for sure), second, there is a whole pdf about his career (I explain quickly because I have seen a significant gain), thank you . Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Memevietnam98 which sources do you think provides significant coverage? From my review of every source, none of them do.  Qcne  (talk)  10:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * This. Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * This talks about his land but nothing about his career? I've posted a second opinion request at WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk now.  Qcne  (talk)  10:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not putting words in your mouth, I mean "in my opinion" (important reason in reading), I don't agree with most all of your arguments – it's not correct and neither are you described it incorrectly, so don't say that to me again, I've got my strong argument. Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi again @Memevietnam98. I have reviewed 3,000 drafts over the last 10 months and feel fairly confident in my assessment, but if you think I have made a gross error in my judgement, feel free to make a post at WP:AFCHD and ask for a second opinion (maybe linking to this thread to provide extra context).  Qcne  (talk)  10:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You can always post that version to that page, I don't want to right now. Memevietnam98 (talk) 10:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll ask the Help Desk for a second opinion.  Qcne  (talk)  10:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:2024 Facebook outage


A tag has been placed on Draft:2024 Facebook outage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Worked on this article to move it to the main space then discovered that it has been redirected to Criticism of Facebook. The argument against it is that it is not suitable for a standalone article because of short media coverage"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Museveni1700 (talk) 10:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)