User talk:Nice4What/Archive-3

September 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 16:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmm. What's your point in sharing this? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 21:16, 1 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I see your revert now. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 21:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Election map
Hey man the original page got archived so I made a new one. Got another retirement this time it’s Bill Fore’s of Texas 17th district. Wollers14 (talk) 14:17, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

And another one this time it's Susan Davis of California's 53rd district. Wollers14 (talk) 21:56, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Wow yet even another one Jim Sesenbrenner of Wisconsin's 5th district. Wollers14 (talk) 00:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Working on it! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 19:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey man got another one here. Roger Marshall of Kansas 1st district he is running for the Senate. Wollers14 (talk) 17:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey man I'll keep you posted on the results of the North Carolina elections tonight. Wollers14 (talk) 23:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Greg Murphy wins in NC-03 mark it as a Republican incumbent. Thank you. Wollers14 (talk) 00:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Just an update it might be a good while before NC-09 comes in. Will let you know as soon as it does. Wollers14 (talk) 00:48, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

UPDATE: NC-09 has been called Dan Bishop wins mark NC-09 as a GOP Incumbent. That's it for the night my friend. Thank you and good night. Wollers14 (talk) 02:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * North Carolina fully updated. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 02:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey man right now I got a cold but I’m still active in watching things go down. Got another retirement : Paul Cook of California’s 8th district. Wollers14 (talk) 00:39, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Updated California. Hope you feel better soon! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 01:42, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks man! Got another too Joe Kennedy is running for senate making Massachusetts’s 4th district open. Wollers14 (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey man, it's been awhile but we got another retirement this time it's Mac Thornberry of Texas's 13th District. Wollers14 (talk) 16:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Now Chris Collins is going to resign. Mark NY-27 as vacant. Wollers14 (talk) 21:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey man happy October and happy retirement to Nita Lowey of New York’s 17th district. Wollers14 (talk) 18:00, 10 October 2019 (UTC) Well man, sadly Elijah Cummings has passed away so Maryland’s 7th district is now vacant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wollers14 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Misleading title
See "Rather than the action of vaping, it is about what people are vaping that is causing the lung illnesses.[7]" It was not vaping itself that caused the illnesses. An oversimplified title is vague and could be misleading to the readers. Adding the image to the lede is misleading. See "The second vaping-induced lung illness death in the US and the first death of its kind in Oregon had used a vaping product containing cannabis oil that was legally purchased from a cannabis shop.[24] It is the first death in the US linking a vaping product to a purchase from a licensed dispensary.[24]" Legal cannabis vapes are also causing the illnesses. See "Legal cannabis liquid purchased from licensed shops is routinely tested and has not been affected." That's not true. There is a lot of misinformation that is being reported. Wikipedia should be careful not to perpetuate any type of misinformation. See MOS:BOLDTITLE for displaying the first sentence in bold. QuackGuru ( talk ) 18:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * See MOS:BEATLES. Also, the title is too wordy and it's very unlikely someone looking for information on the outbreak will know to search up the current very-specific title. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 19:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It is common practice to bold the text that matches the title. If a reader searches for a similar title they can find to by a redirect. See the redirects. QuackGuru ( talk ) 20:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=vaping%20lung&title=Special%3ASearch&fulltext=1&ns0=1

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=lung%20outbreak&title=Special%3ASearch&fulltext=1&ns0=1

Search results using just two words. QuackGuru ( talk ) 20:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

I understand the reason you want the image at the top of the article. You want to blame the illicit vapes for causing most of the deaths. That's original research. QuackGuru ( talk ) 23:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * That's not original research, most places are blaming Vitamin E acetate. The updated caption is accurate. Also, again, read MOS:BEATLES. It is a part of MOS:BOLDTITLE! I suggest you at least self-revert that part. And don't police the page just because you split the article prior to a consensus being reached. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 23:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * See MOS:BEATLES: "In general, if the article's title is absent from the first sentence, do not apply the bold style to related text that does appear:" That is not applicable to this case. That is about if the title is absent from the first sentence.
 * Most places that are blaming Vitamin E acetate do not have evidence to support their claims and contradicts CDC and the US FDA. The testing by the US FDA is not even finished yet. The updated caption is unsourced and a violation of WP:CAPTION. QuackGuru ( talk ) 23:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The title is absent! Read the example about The Beatles in the United States! I can't revert because of WP:3RR, but please reread all of MOS:BOLDTITLE if you're going to cite it! Worth noting that you "include the title if it can be accommodated in a natural way"; the current way is not natural. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 23:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The title is not absent for the first sentence. The bold text naturally matches the title in the first sentence. QuackGuru ( talk ) 23:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Look at the example regarding "The Beatles in the United States". It's an identical scenario!
 * Apply it to the lede you currently have randomly bolded:
 * Look similar enough? Please self-revert. If you don't understand MOS:BOLDTITLE, please use a relevant talk page instead of being disruptive. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 00:05, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I have naturally bolded the text that appears in the article's title. It was not random. The text in the article's title does appear in the first sentence. QuackGuru ( talk ) 00:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It seems you're misunderstanding why MOS:BEATLES exists... Look at the side-by-side comparison to The Beatles! Please self-revert. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 00:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If the article title and the bold text must be exactly the same then I can self-revert. I think MOS:BEATLES is a bit vague. QuackGuru ( talk ) 00:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * See "In general, if the article's title is absent from the first sentence, do not apply the bold style to related text that does appear:" It wasn't related text. It was the same wording found in the title. <b style="color: #e34234;">QuackGuru</b> ( talk ) 00:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Again... look at the example with The Beatles. It's the same wording found in the title as well, but that's incorrect formatting. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 00:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Your saying the text and title must match word for word in order for it to be in bold. <b style="color: #e34234;">QuackGuru</b> ( talk ) 00:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm saying that the precise words "2019 United States outbreak of lung illness linked to vaping products" need to be in the lede to be bolded. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 00:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I think MOS:BEATLES does not exactly state that. It left the door open for interpretation. It should be clarified to avoid this kind of dispute in the future. <b style="color: #e34234;">QuackGuru</b> ( talk ) 00:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Again... look at the example with The Beatles. It's the same wording found in the title as well, but that's incorrect formatting. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 00:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Your saying the text and title must match word for word in order for it to be in bold. <b style="color: #e34234;">QuackGuru</b> ( talk ) 00:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm saying that the precise words "2019 United States outbreak of lung illness linked to vaping products" need to be in the lede to be bolded. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 00:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I think MOS:BEATLES does not exactly state that. It left the door open for interpretation. It should be clarified to avoid this kind of dispute in the future. <b style="color: #e34234;">QuackGuru</b> ( talk ) 00:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

You are well past 3 reverts but your edits were vaporized like smoke. <b style="color: #e34234;">QuackGuru</b> ( talk ) 15:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You need to stop preventing other editors from contributing to the article as well. Having all the images centered at the bottom of every subsection makes the article look more like something you'd read on Wikia, not Wikipedia. Also, your image of the victim holding up the "I Want To Start A No Vaping Campaign" sign does not pass the fair use criteria as it doesn't add further understanding and context for readers and no reliable source establishes its specific importance; I would nominate it for deletion, but I'm not sure how to do that formally. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 17:19, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If an edit adds original research or other problems I can delete it. I moved some of the images to the right and added a new image to the lede. "I Want To Start A No Vaping Campaign" has gone viral and is a salient topic. I didn't fully understand the topic until I saw the image of the person hooked up to machines! <b style="color: #e34234;">QuackGuru</b> ( talk ) 18:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Kanye West
Lovely to see your hard work on Jesus Is King. I've already GA nominated Kids See Ghosts and The Life of Pablo is almost ready; Ye is next for GA status after that. But as you can probably tell I'm trying to make West's albums a GA topic since the ones prior to these are already GAs, so I'd like to ask would you wish to work with me on making Jesus Is King one after it's out since you had originally nominated Yandhi for one as well? I don't mean literally a few days after the release as single releases and maybe even updates will 99% occur so it would instant fail due to stability, I'm referring to a period at least months after the album's release? --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:49, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me! I've been keeping up with the background recording process for nearly a year (that subsection is quite lengthy at the moment), so I'm sure I can help out with make Jesus Is King fit GA status. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 11:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah sounds good, I've been working hard on TLOP but not too sure if "the album was voted by readers at the position of fifth for the most underrated and most overrated album of the year, respectively" reads correctly, do you think the sentence needs changing or is it fine like this? I've tried but can't seem to find a good way to reword so would be more than welcome for your input. --Kyle Peake (talk) 15:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Do you think a GA review for KSG is possible? --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * As in, you'd like me to do a GA review for the article? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 01:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, as we're both interested in giving West a GT with his albums. Do you think a review would be possible? --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'll try to review KSG sometime this week if I have the time. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 17:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Not original research
For the record, this isn't "original research". I know to you that technically probably constitutes original research because there's no available source (which is not to say that a source doesn't exist) describing the sequence of events, but I added that at the time the article was written—you know, before you started editing it—and that was what happened. Atlantic Records revealed the cover art and title, whether intentionally or not, before Charli had the chance to. Oh, and please don't restore the clear template. Nobody besides you appears to want big blank white spaces on articles, and it really appears you're the only editor who bothers adding it on whatever article is currently the focus of your attention. Most of the time it's not necessary—we don't know how many users have widescreen displays so that the template doesn't interfere with the track listing or the displays of most users (mobile, etc). Regardless, it doesn't squash it that much that it's unintelligible. It's not desirable in most cases. Thanks.  Ss  112   01:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I've reverted your insertion of it onto Pop 2 (mixtape). Please don't edit war over it, as if you do, I will take it up with an administrator. You have previously warned (including by myself) and even been blocked for edit warring, so I suggest you don't. Clear templates are not a requirement. You're free to do it on whatever article you start and where you've written all the material, but when you go around adding it to articles you didn't solely write but only have an interest in and where you think it's needed, that's where it gets problematic.  Ss  112   02:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You need to calm down! Also, the OR I removed from Charli is tiny technicals about accidental "leaks" that weren't widely covered and were no longer seen in the sources provided. Don't take all this so personally. And read WP:OWN sometime! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 17:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Also I'd suggest reading on when the clear template is meant to be used, because I believe to be using it right. It's meant to prevent the flow of information onto an unrelated section. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 19:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Hilarious. Thanks buddy, I know what WP:OWN is and so does everybody on this site. I literally tell you that nobody would want a big white space on an article, and that's "owning" an article to you...right. Overstate much? That's like me saying you putting it there is you owning an article because that's the way you want to have it. Maybe try not to throw out stupid accusations of another editor owning an article when they disagree with you so freely in future. Also, I'm well aware what the clear template is for. That doesn't mean I insist on using it on as many articles as you do. And then, being the editor who can't leave something alone that you are, you go and tag the section for expansion with the assumption that all desktop viewers have the same view that you do, whereas I just told you I know for a fact viewing that page with a widescreen display would not cause any issues. It does not cause legibility concerns even at the current stage. Oh, and if you reply...Don't take it personally now. But I think you already did, hence why you want to cry "WP:OWN" when someone disagrees with a choice you made an article.  Ss  112   14:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I commend your dedication to taking Wikipedia talk pages this seriously lol. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 17:44, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * ...Says the user who just started a 1,000-byte discussion on the talk page of the article to use a damn clear template. Lmfao.  Ss  112   18:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, you can't really blame me for trying to avoid an edit war. Had to be lengthy because I worried other editors would be confused about the use of the clear template like you are. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 18:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Lmao. Yeah. Because not wanting to use it is the same thing as being "confused" about it. And it's hilarious how you make out like your only other alternative would've been to "edit war" with me. If you tried it, or if you try it again on another issue, I will report you to an admin. I'm sure they'd like to know what your excuse is the next time when you've been blocked for it previously.  Ss  112   18:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Blocked for what exactly?? And obviously if I edit warred, you're meant to report me to an admin in the same sense that I'd report you if you did the same thing! Not much of a statement there. The use of the talk page is meant to avoid editing disputes. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 18:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You have been blocked for edit warring in the past. How are you not aware of your own block log?  Ss  112   18:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You mean from over a year ago in regards to Syrian-related articles? Yes, of course I'm aware. There's been plenty use of talk pages since then. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 19:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Kids See Ghosts and Ye
About Kids See Ghosts, I would be happy if you did follow through with a GA review this week. On a related note though, are there any current issues you can see that would result in a quick fail as I'm not too experienced with album articles? As for Ye, should the album total activity or albums number from source 127 be used for certified units/sales? --Kyle Peake (talk) 12:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll run through the references tonight and let you know what I see. 👍 Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 18:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Move your content to Charli Live Tour
It's clogging up Charli (album) with extraneous detail that is not about the production or content of the album. Otherwise I'll move it there myself, but I thought you might want credit for what you wrote. You can leave a little paragraph about it on the article, but move the tour dates and set list.  Ss  112   03:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, names of tours are not italicised (why would we italicise Charli Live? The name of the album is just "Charli", as you well know), and I've removed the table from the article because it's not sourced at all. If you do move it, make sure to source all those dates.  Ss  112   03:26, 24 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I was basing this on what's seen on articles such as Love + Fear and The Nicki Wrld Tour. I'll see if I can gather more information to start a separate article for the tour. By the way, the dates, locations and venues were all cited in the Billboard article I provided. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 03:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Then split it off today or I'll do it myself. It's getting too long for this article. I wouldn't use other pop articles as a template, they're not exemplary either. Tours are not part of an album's production, content and are extraneous even to the promotion of it.  Ss  112   03:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Created the article, but just so you know that when you've proposed a split, we can discuss it. No need to threaten a deadline. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 03:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Cool. Linked to main article, removed all but the paragraph from Charli as we should not be doubling up the same content.  Ss  112   03:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks good. 👍 Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 03:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Also, please don't restore the clear template again on the article. Great, you say it's a compromise, but you already opened a discussion to get consensus for its use no matter where it is, so wait for other users to weigh in before restoring it. Otherwise the discussion is pointless.  Ss  112   03:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Inserting content not supported by a cited source
Please don't insert material that is not supported by a cited source. In this edit, you added text and then citations &mdash; but the citation you added does not support the text you added. I'm assuming this was inadvertent, but please be cautious. Regards --Neutralitytalk 00:10, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * "The whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications" from CNN. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 00:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You also inserted that the whistleblower complaint was from a person "outside the Intelligence Community" which is not supported by either source. Neutralitytalk 00:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, which is why I didn't try to reinsert it. I misread the WaPo source. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 00:25, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Election map (continued)
I've updated Maryland. Archived our previous conversation so decided to restart it here. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 15:54, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Sorry for the late notification I thought I sent a message and found it not there any more. Francis Rooney of Florida's 19th District is retiring. Wollers14 (talk) 05:40, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Hey man got another retirement. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii’s 2nd district. Wollers14 (talk) 14:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Katie Hill of California’s 25th district is resigning. Mark it as vacant. Wollers14 (talk) 07:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Greg Walden of Oregon's 2nd District is going to retire. Wollers14 (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Hey man got another retirement for you. Pete Visclosky Of Indiana’s 1st district. Thanks again.Wollers14 (talk) 18:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Hey man got another retirement for you Peter King of New York’s 2nd district. Wollers14 (talk) 14:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

If you don't know the way things are done, don't revert editors
When two songs are released concurrently but are not a double A-side, they are generally listed by alphabetical order by precedent. For instance, Camila's Liar and Shameless were recently done that way. You can say that's an WP:OTHERSTUFF example, but no articles list separate singles in one parameter if they are released at the same time. We list them consecutively, and it should not be just random order, so we either list one or none. I don't care either way, but we don't list both in one. That's not correct because it implies they're a double A-side. If you don't understand precedent, don't act like you do. Also, the edit was already reverted. WP:BRD still applies, if you weren't the editor who added it. Don't edit war. Thank you.  Ss  112   03:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Jesus Is King
Still hoping for a future GA from you in this album just as I am in Ye for me, but (for future reference) I believe it would be a good idea to nominate the album in 2020 as if it is nominated around a month after release or something then the album will still be yet to rank among best albums of 2019, year end charts lists, etc. Understand? --Kyle Peake (talk) 12:12, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jesus Is King album cover (New York Listening Session).png
Thanks for uploading File:Jesus Is King album cover (New York Listening Session).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Thanksgiving Master of None.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thanksgiving Master of None.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Charli XCX - Come To My Party (Demo).ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Charli XCX - Come To My Party (Demo).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

"Use This Gospel"
Both of the sources point towards "Chakras" as the original title. Appreciate the good faith edit, but do not change unless you have multiple sources confirming otherwise. --Kyle Peake (talk) 22:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

GA nominee?
Are you still considering nominating JIK for GA status in 2020 as I haven't seen you work too much on it recently (no insult)? If not, I will be willing to do so myself as a frequent contributor. --Kyle Peake (talk) 17:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll pick up my slack and work on the article more. I still plan on nominating it or GA status in 2020. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 19:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't matter who as long as it's nominated, but can you stop citing publisher on sources where they should be cited as website or work? --Kyle Peake (talk) 23:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

edit war
Firstly you misunderstand wp:brd, once you have been reverted you are supposed to make the case, not the person reverting. Secondly you are now at 3rr, as I will be if I revert you.Slatersteven (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Mate, explain your reverts? The entire death is notable simply because of conspiracy theories. Why make this more difficult than it has to be? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 18:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Also I'm at two reverts, though I have no intention in edit warring with you. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 18:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * This discussion should be at the talk page, not here. You case for retention should have been made and consensus reached before you reverted back. But you are correct it would have been me who woulds have reverted three time, you did indeed only revert twice.Slatersteven (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * My case was the Yahoo! article I linked in my revert. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 18:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Charli XCX - Come To My Party (Demo).ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Charli XCX - Come To My Party (Demo).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Blue stop hand.svg


A tag has been placed on File:Blue stop hand.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Invalid OS (talk) 14:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

PNG format is preferred for album covers
Your images have been replaced/deleted before, I don't know why you're fighting this. As I said, maybe start uploading PNGs for album covers and then your images won't be replaced? PNG covers are preferred for album covers per MOS:HOTLINK and WP:IUP. JPGs are a compressed image format; surely you know this?  Ss  112   21:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Where has this been an issue before? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 21:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Er, just above? Right here on your talk page there's a notice that you uploaded an SVG that was deleted, and above that a PNG and so on. Besides, I didn't say it was an "issue", I meant I'm pretty sure users have replaced your images before and you haven't cared.  Ss  112   21:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Unrelated reasons as to why those images were removed. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 21:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Great. Letting you know, fair use images require you to provide the URL for the webpage you got the image from (not the URL for the specific image, but the webpage it was hosted on). I know you've done this in the past but it needs to be done for all images. I see you later uploaded the cover for Teyana Taylor's "We Got Love" but only wrote "Apple Music" and then you uploaded a different version of the same cover that was "clearer". This rather seems like you did not actually source the cover from Apple Music then, because if you did, it would have been the clearer version in the first place, would it not?  Ss  112   03:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kaytranada Bubba album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kaytranada Bubba album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Your edits on SWT Live
It appears you only reverted to tell me to "calm" (thanks for the tip) and be a smart alec about my saying "Jesus Christ". I'll say it again so you get my exasperation: Jesus Christ, use your brain. We don't denote every track is "live" on a live album. It's expected, it's known. You just couldn't help yourself trying to get the article started before the title was even officially announced. You don't own the article, buddy, so why don't you calm down and stop reverting every editor who makes an edit to it? Your annoying little clear templates are going to get removed, I hope you know. It's Ariana, the article is going to get an influx of traffic soon, so good luck trying to continue exercising control over it—even though you shouldn't be doing so to begin with. Starting an article doesn't mean you get final say on everything that happens to it.  Ss  112   04:58, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * That's great, thank you. I'm trying to remove the clear section by expanding the background section. Want to help? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 05:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Don't keep reverting and telling me to take it to the talk page when you haven't explained why we need "live" next to every track on a live album. You're reverting to prove a point. It's disruptive.  Ss  112   05:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Mate, you kinda come off as a jerk. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 05:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SWT Live cover art.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SWT Live cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Military occupation vector (UkraineMoldova).png


The file File:Military occupation vector (UkraineMoldova).png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, uploaded for >6mo"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Jesus Is King
As you had probably noticed, expansions have been made by me to the themes and lyrics section. I can see you've done the same but would you care to help out making all of the tracks have their respective meanings mentioned so the section is in detail? --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I've recently attempted to reorganize the section to be in track list order (other than "God Is" since it explains the album's entire mission). Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 02:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited K Bye for Now (SWT Live), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hart ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/K_Bye_for_Now_%28SWT_Live%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/K_Bye_for_Now_%28SWT_Live%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Executive producers
If you're wandering why the executive producers have been removed in articles is because of this discussion. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I was about to ask about the removal of exec. producers, thanks! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 23:39, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't revert if you don't have nothing to say about the matter, I try get a response from you at one of the article's talk page (which you suggest by the way) and you didn't respond to it. Nobody seems to have a problem with producers being remove from the infobox since they are only credited as co-producers and additional producers, every single producer don't need to be in the infobox if they only credited that way, it's make the list unnecessary long. You seem to be the only one who is making a big deal out of it. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

RfC on producer entries in infobox album
A discussion has begun at WT:ALBUMS regarding the producer parameter used in this infobox. Please add your comments there. – TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 13:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Films featuring Broly has been nominated for discussion
Category:Films featuring Broly, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 21:32, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of New Body
Hello! Your submission of New Body at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Your opinion is not the consensus
Metacritic is definitely more reliable than AnyDecentMusic. Please, do not tell me to revert an edit only because you think it is the consensus to include an average review that does not include clearly important reviews. If you tell me that, I'll tell you to please not tell me to include or revert anything to avoid edit wars. Nbro (talk) 12:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * it's not my opinion and I'm sorry to say you come off as a bit biased because you fought to include a 91/100 user score for MC. My point is that nearly every other article includes both MC and ADM, including Room 25, To Pimp A Butterfly, Pop 2, and even Eminem's last album Kamikaze. So if you, Nbro, as one user with your own opinion, believes that ADM is bullshit, ignores "clearly important reviews" (your opinion) and shouldn't merit inclusion, find a consensus to change that status quo. The onus is on you to get a change, so please self-revert to show your willing to discuss instead of edit war. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 12:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I already removed that note, because someone, maybe you, correctly pointed out that you may create as many accounts as you please only to rate the album, so I am not as biased as you to say that I am biased. The consensus you're talking about only refers to your own consensus with yourself. Maybe it was you that added these reviews to the albums. Nbro (talk) 12:17, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * "Maybe it was you that added these reviews to the albums" reads like a conspiracy theory. No, go look at many other album articles including Eminem's other articles. I just want you to recognize that ADM is well respected and almost always included. You need to suck it up, realizing you're edit warring instead of discussing, and self-revert. Truth being told, I wouldn't be surprised if another editor were to readd ADM before I could. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 12:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Try reverting that edit, and I will revert it again. ADM exists since 2009. Well respected? By whom? According to whom? Metacritic exists since 1999, as well as HipHopDX (not included in ADM's review) and The Daily Telegraph (not included in ADM's review) since 1855. So, keep on saying shit! Nbro (talk) 12:28, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Saying "Try reverting that edit, and I will revert it again." indicates that you'll engage in a future edit war rather than discussion, which isn't helping out... Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 12:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for New Body
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Aha
Saw on my watchlist, I thought you actually added a google-search. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * No, just a niche article about Google's search engine displaying wrong info during an edit war 😆 Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 19:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Killing of Luo Changqing
Hello! Your submission of Killing of Luo Changqing at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Citobun (talk) 12:49, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voodoo ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Act_I:_Eternal_Sunshine_%28The_Pledge%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Act_I:_Eternal_Sunshine_%28The_Pledge%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:33, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Killing of Luo Changqing at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

17 Million F*ck offs DYK review
I have responded to your comments on Template:Did you know nominations/17 Million Fuck Offs.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 20:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Please could you continue the review?  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 23:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I am grateful that you clarified your position, but the DYK nomination is not the place for a drive-by comment. The article talk page or even my talk page are more appropriate locations to raise such concerns. Thank you for your comments anyway.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 15:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Edit War on Iowa Democrat Caucus

 * Do not edit war over at 2020 Iowa Democratic caucuses, thank you. - Centrist1 (talk 14:49, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Stop being petty by copying what I left on your talk page. You are engaged in an edit war with multiple editors, including me and Smith0124.
 * Revert 1
 * Revert 2
 * Revert 3 + Extra
 * Revert 4
 * This is your second formal warning. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 14:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Don’t make absurd claim like that and I didn’t copy you, that’s the biggest load of crap I’ve ever heard. You are the one that is petty, not me. Here are you reverts,  and more to follow. So don’t play innocent and this is also a warning that future engagement in edit war will be reported. - Centrist1 (talk) 15:47, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Word-for-word copy. Come on now. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 18:20, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Jay Electronica projects
I'm happy someone made an article for Act I finally. However, do we know if the movement names you listed are official or not? I assumed they were simply names given by the fans; I've only really seen them on Genius, a fan-editable site. Also, has Act I ever officially been called a mixtape? I suppose it is a free release online, but I've also seen it called an EP which it fits the bill of being 15 minutes long. It is very similar in nature and release to Earl Sweatshirt's Solace (EP), which is listed as an EP on its article. Also, I didn't get the impression that A Written Testimony was the title of Jay's upcoming album. It seemed more of a description to me. However if Kanye West's Yandhi and Cruel Winter have been given articles I suppose the album can be, even if no title is confirmed for it yet. I think it's more likely to be Act III: A Written Testimony (The Prestige), but that's just speculation on my part. 2406:E002:59BA:9E01:4466:DC10:6B19:7A3A (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, glad to make articles for Jay Electronica! I was surprised that Act I didn't have an article yet. Anyways, cited sources call Act I a mixtape, EP, song, and simply a "project" so it's not too certain. The movement's titles are cited. Also, multiple sources are reporting A Written Testimony as the album's title. If it changes, the article can be moved. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 22:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:New Body - Kanye West, Ty Dolla Sign, Nicki Minaj.ogg


A tag has been placed on File:New Body - Kanye West, Ty Dolla Sign, Nicki Minaj.ogg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Premeditated (talk) 11:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

File:New Body - Kanye West, Ty Dolla Sign, Nicki Minaj.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:New Body - Kanye West, Ty Dolla Sign, Nicki Minaj.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Premeditated (talk) 15:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

JIK co-nomination
Was briefly brought up on Talk:Jesus Is King Part II and I think you could be the one to complete the Themes and lyrics section as you've been the main contributor to it, though there will be other changes to be made then onwards that I will undertake. However, see User:Zmbro as an example of how co-nominating works (technically, I co-nominated "Blood on the Leaves") and I would nominate the article but credit you how he credited me. Thoughts on this ideology? --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I can finish up that section. I think Background and recording is more than complete too. I'm fine with that nomination process. Let me know what else can be done! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 19:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for A Written Testimony
— Maile (talk) 12:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Jesus Is King Part II
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I just wanted to mention two points. As a professional writer, I have often been dismayed by the way an editor handles my work. But the fact is that the editor is the first person to actually read my work, and if s/he doesn't understand it, it's not going to go with readers either. If I come across your hook in prep and cannot understand it, you have a problem. Ignoring it is not the correct way to deal with it.
 * Two, we have a rule that nominators are not allowed to edit their own hooks while in prep. You did the right thing by bringing it up at WT:DYK, but apparently no other editors were around (or interested) to argue the point. I hope we will have more cordial relations in future. Yoninah (talk) 15:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The grammar issue that occurred by using the word "with" twice I can understand. However, the entire rewording was very different from the proposed/approved hook. That's why I started the talk page conversation and reverted back. Thanks for coming to my talk page, I'm hoping for good relations between us as well! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 15:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Follow God sample
I've shortened the file using audacity and exported it separately to the original even with a different name, but the edits aren't coming through whatsoever when I submit the new version(s). Why is this? --Kyle Peake (talk) 08:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure. I use QuickTime + VLC to trim audio samples. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 12:57, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Must've been a glitch since Wiki is showing the audio fine now. --Kyle Peake (talk) 21:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring
Just a heads up Nice4What. It's not a good idea to use edit warring to force your will into an article. This is especially true for articles in the American politics space, which are under discretionary sanctions. If someone objects to a change that you made, you should try to follow WP:BRD and not be quite so aggressive in your editing. - MrX 🖋 17:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * One revert isn't editing warring unless sanctions are placed. Don't link me the edit history and present it in a misleading way. Adding the "disputed" tag to the infobox isn't helpful considering the footnote explains the dispute anyways. Just be patient and wait for the recount. I appreciate that you came to my talk page and I agree, let's not be aggressive to one another. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 17:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I disagree that the "footnote explains it anyway", but that's a debate for the article talk page. Your first edit reverted my change in which I placed the disputed tag so it would be visible adjacent to the erroneous delegate count. Your second edit was also a revert. While that's technically edit warring, you wouldn't be blocked for such a minor case. However, if you were to continue editing that way, it could pose an issue. A light touch is recommended. - MrX 🖋 17:55, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Schedule
Once you're done with current ventures that you mentioned previously, I think Ye should be GA reviewed by you before we move on to a joint nomination of Jesus Is King. This is because it has been in the cue for months, while JIK hasn't been nominated yet... thoughts? --Kyle Peake (talk) 17:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * So... any thoughts by now? --Kyle Peake (talk) 17:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2009 Russian ban on Belarusian dairy products, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RT ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2009_Russian_ban_on_Belarusian_dairy_products check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2009_Russian_ban_on_Belarusian_dairy_products?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC) == File:New Body - Kanye West, Ty Dolla Sign, Nicki Minaj.ogg listed for discussion == A file that you uploaded or altered, File:New Body - Kanye West, Ty Dolla Sign, Nicki Minaj.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Milk War
Hello! Your submission of Milk War at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Sounder Bruce  07:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Pete
Why'd you remove him from the infobox? He still has more delegates than some of the people up there. And Kasich/Rubio weren't taken out when they dropped out in 2016. MB298 (talk) 00:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Kasich/Rubio/Cruz/Trump were seen as the final four back in 2016. Pete dropped out before Super Tuesday. That's why he was removed from the infobox. The primaries are still ongoing. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 00:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lil Uzi Vert Eternal Atake alternative cover.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Lil Uzi Vert Eternal Atake alternative cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge)
Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 00:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 13:43, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shiny Suit Theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horn ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Shiny_Suit_Theory check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Shiny_Suit_Theory?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Milk War
— Wug·a·po·des​ 19:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 00:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Nice4What, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3ANice4What added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ {sting} 02:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 12:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ant Clemons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Game and All Mine ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ant_Clemons check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ant_Clemons?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)