User talk:Otis the Texan

Welcome!
Hello, Otis the Texan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kahastok talk 10:01, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Nassar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Nassar (actor). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Kahastok talk 10:01, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Philippine Bausch listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Philippine Bausch. Since you had some involvement with the Philippine Bausch redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Pam D  16:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

"Illovz" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Illovz. Since you had some involvement with the Illovz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Fram (talk) 11:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

"Huangcun Airport" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Huangcun Airport. Since you had some involvement with the Huangcun Airport redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 00:28, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Amber Heard
I reverted your "former actress" edit to Amber Heard, which seems to me to be unsourced speculation. Wikipedia is a tertiary source that reports information found in reliable secondary sources. This is particularly important when the edit is controversial or regards a living person. Please see WP:RS and WP:BLP for the relevant policies on this. -- The Anome (talk) 21:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
See my talk page for help with your content and sources. Isaidnoway (talk)  17:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

"3102000153" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3102000153. Since you had some involvement with the 3102000153 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 20:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

"Inmate No. 3102000153" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Inmate No. 3102000153. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

"Second SARS outbreak" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Second SARS outbreak. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 13:53, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Maldonado


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Joe Maldonado, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jack Frost (talk) 07:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

"Vein attack" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Vein attack. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 17:05, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vita ugryzie


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Vita ugryzie. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:45, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, Otis the Texan,
 * Please do not create articles because you are bored. This is vandalism and can lead to a loss of editing privileges. Why don't you create yourself a blog and you can put whatever you want on it and you don't have to worry about your work being deleted. Just a suggestion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet tagging
Hello, Otis the Texan,

Do not tag user pages stating that editors are sockpuppets based on your suspicions. This task is left to checkusers and SPI clerks. I don't tag these pages and I'm an administrator. Sometimes checkusers want to tag the user page, other times they don't want to give the sockpuppet extra attention. It's their call, not yours or mine.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. However what these users are doing on the article about the German town of Tonisvort is unacceptable. Multiple users keep posting pictures of a guy named Amir Dumberger and Aboudi Abdullah and add them as if their pictures are flag and coats of arms of Tonisvort. They also keep writing that one of them is the mayor. Their vandalism of Tonisvort keeps getting undone, but without any of their accounts being blocked, Tonisvort keeps getting vandalized over and over. This has been happening since January. I simply don’t see any solution except getting them blocked and suspected of sock puppetry. If this doesn’t happen, Tonisvort will just continue getting vandalized for years and years. But as you were mentioning that it is not my or your job to suspect them of sock puppetry, would you be able to let a checkuser and SPI clerk know about this issue, so that the article about Tonisvort doesn’t just keep getting vandalized over and over and other articles also don’t get vandalized by them. Otis the Texan (talk) 03:38, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

In Guezzam
Hi,

While checking pages with broken reference names, I came across In Guezzam and saw this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=In_Guezzam&diff=946580702&oldid=946567281 you made, it adds reference names that are not defined. Do you still know these reference names and can you correct them? Difool (talk) 01:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

"Deutschlandese Airlines" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Deutschlandese Airlines. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 23 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. JBchrch  talk  13:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

"Deutschland Airlines" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Deutschland Airlines. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 23 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 20:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Deutschlandese


A tag has been placed on Deutschlandese requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Tamzin (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 20:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Deutschlandese language


A tag has been placed on Deutschlandese language requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Tamzin (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 20:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

"Largest village in Russia" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Largest village in Russia. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 16:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

"Bill Hanks" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bill Hanks. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 19:55, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

"German Blimpways" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect German Blimpways. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 19:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

"University of Lahn" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect University of Lahn. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 20:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

"Sarsidiot" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sarsidiot. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 17:42, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pindiga


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Pindiga, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Like I told you earlier this year, if you want to make "jokes", get your own blog. This is inappropriate conduct on Wikipedia. You have a talk page full of warning messages and you have very little rope left. Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, This nonsense content was only meant to be temporary. I made my draft with the real content about the Nigerian town. I just thought it would creative and funny to have the nonsense version and the speedy deletion box in the page's view history. I was going to quickly remove the silly content and paste my draft, however the article was deleted before I could do that. I have since recreated the article but only the real and appropriate version, which is about the Nigerian town of Pindiga.--Otis the Texan (talk) 02:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Johnny Au. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Toronto Pearson International Airport have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Blog.to is considered unreliable.  Johnny Au  (talk/contributions) 03:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Pindiga moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Pindiga, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 03:31, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Leventio. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Operation London Bridge, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Leventio (talk) 02:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pindiga
Hello, Otis the Texan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pindiga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Sahaib. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Depp have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Sahaib (talk) 21:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pindiga


Hello, Otis the Texan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pindiga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Annie Shapiro for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annie Shapiro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Annie Shapiro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — Bilorv ( talk ) 14:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Retail companies established in 2022


A tag has been placed on Category:Retail companies established in 2022 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Retail companies established in 2023


A tag has been placed on Category:Retail companies established in 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Zellers
Hello, Otis the Texan,

Regarding this article, and others, we never would change a category based on projected changes in the future. So many things can happen between now and 2023, plans can change and expand or retract, funding can fall through, another company takes over the plan instead, we could have another pandemic and plans are delayed, lots of things can happen between the announcement of a business change and the plan actually occurring. And this doesn't have to do with the reliability of the source for the announcement but just the fact that situations can change drastically over time. This situation is not specific to this article, over even to businesses, but to all sorts of projected outcomes in articles. On music articles, for example, edit wars can break out over disputes about when an album is announced to be released and when it is actually released. You can read more about this phenomena at WP:CRYSTALBALL. Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 21:32, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)