User talk:Prez2016

Welcome!
Hi Prez2016, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

""

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

""

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 16:03, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

Lt. Governors
Thanks for your work with lt. governors, but there is already a category for state lt. governors, Category:State lieutenant governors of the United States. -- tomf688 {talk} 01:11, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

NJ Cabinet members
It's a brand new category, but seems way too broad if it only has NJ cabinet members. I'd suggest creating and making it a subcategory of. Then all of the NJ cabinet members would be in a logical group, even when subcategories are created and populated for the other 49 states. Alansohn 01:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * There are more than 20 members listed on Richard Codey's page and that's probably typical nationwide. Do the math, and 20 members times 50 states equals 1,000 people in the category, and every 2% has nothing to do with the other 98% and a list that's impossible to manage or use. With state-level cats you'd have a nice neat group of 20 or so members, plus people who served in the past and it's managable. I'm happy to help if you need it.


 * I fixed both the Union County page and the template. It's been a rough time with all of the NJ governmental changes at virtually every level. Alansohn 01:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Charlie Crist
Please see my comments regarding your recent edit to this page. Can you provide a source which suggests Crist was at one point an educator? Or can you justify adding the category based on his tenure as Commissioner of Education? I'd be interested to hear your line of thinking on this. See you there. Thanks. ALC Washington 20:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I replied to your response several days ago. Please see the talk page. ALC Washington 23:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

New Jersey edits and WP:NJ
I want to thank you for all of your work on New Jersey-related pages. I would like to invite you to participate in Wikiproject New Jersey, a very loosely organized group of nearly two dozen people who are working on filling in and expanding the details on Wikipedia of all things New Jersey. Membership has no obligations (and even fewer priveleges), but if there is anything about New Jersey that you would like to work on (and you'be already proven a strong interest), i think you will find a number of like-minded people. Alansohn 23:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Robert Caro
Just wanted you to know that I corrected your alumni category from Columbia to Princeton. I don't normally let people know this, but it was right there in the article that he graduated from Princeton in 1957 and it didn't look good (where did you get that info, anyway?). Daniel Case 04:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

OK. I'll put that in the article then (a lot of people forget this, but categories should reflect article content). Daniel Case 03:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

NJ Collaboration of the Week
Thanks for participating in Wikiproject New Jersey. In an attempt to create articles for some of the non-existing pages related to New Jersey, NJCOTW was recently created to bring members of WP:NJ together to work collaboratively on a certain selected topic, which this week is List of Governors of New Jersey. Please help by nominating/voting/commenting on articles on WP:NJCOTW, or by helping to improve articles in the scope of the topic for the NJCOTW. AndyZ 00:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

edit summaries
Hey, could I ask you to use edit summaries when putting lots of articles in categories? It just saves a lot of people time double-checking. &mdash; Laura Scudder &#9742; 00:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

State treasurers
William Donald Schaefer is not the Treasurer of Maryland, he is the Comptroller of Maryland. The Comptroller is the chief financial position in the state, though, which I assume is the goal of your template. You may want to reconsider changing the name of the template to something more ambiguous, such as Template:U.S. state chief financial officers or something similar but shorter. -- tomf688 {talk} 03:06, 28 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry I just assumed it was you. -- tomf688 {talk} 03:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Please Use Edit Summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.  ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 04:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Category:County Government Officials in the U.S.
Hi, you might want to hold off before you get too far along in adding Category:County Government Officials in the U.S. to a whole lot of articles. It seems a rather unwieldy and poorly defined category. older ≠ wiser 02:05, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Jane Hadley Barkley
An anonymous user has added a succession box to the Jane Hadley Barkley article you created, however they did it incorrectly. Since I don't know how to fix this problem, I have tagged the article for cleanup and explained the situation on the article's Talk page. --TommyBoy 05:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Nevermind, another user has fixed the problem. --TommyBoy 01:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey advisory
 The WikiProject New Jersey Reboot Help Wanted! Articles are languishing, categories are stagnating, assessments are missing, the portal is static, and you can help.

You are cordially invited to visit the redesigned WikiProject New Jersey and invite others to do the same.

You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. You can remove yourself from the mailing list here.
 * Notice delivery by xenobot  01:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (August 2008)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  18:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (September 2008)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  16:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (October 2008)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  13:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Category:United States political leader templates
There is some discussion of the format of templates in Category:United States political leader templates such as U.S. State Attorneys General and U.S. State Secretaries of State going on at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography. Feel free to discuss.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (November 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  14:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Prez2016! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 24 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Henry F. Wojtaszek -
 * 2) Charles Richman -
 * 3) Frank Pelzman -
 * 4) Regena Thomas -
 * 5) Chuck Hunt -
 * 6) Jan Cellucci -
 * 7) Ninfa Segarra -
 * 8) Herbert Berman -
 * 9) Joyce Dinkins -
 * 10) Frank Milano -


 * 11. Anthony Nanula
 * 12. Martha Wilkinson
 * 13. Peg Bennett
 * 14. Mary Lou Rath
 * 15. Al Coppola
 * 16. Laureen Oliver
 * 17. Doug Jamerson
 * 18. Daniel E. Wall
 * 19. Chauncey Parker
 * 20. Nancy Naples
 * 21. James Hartmann
 * 22. Mary Anne Krupsak
 * 23. Nancy Larraine Hoffmann

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (January 2010)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  13:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Susan Tietjen
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Susan Tietjen. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Susan Tietjen. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henry F. Wojtaszek


The article Henry F. Wojtaszek has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Henry F. Wojtaszek is a non-notable local official.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prodmaster (talk) 22:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peg Bennett


The article Peg Bennett has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP about the wife of the man who was acting governor of New Jersey for all of three and a half days. No significant coverage found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 09:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of James Hartmann for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Hartmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James Hartmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 18:20, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jack Quinn III


The article Jack Quinn III has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 13:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mary Jo Codey


The article Mary Jo Codey has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not seeing much that would make this person in her own right notable enough for an article. It looks like she was married to a new Jersey governor and does some mental health advocacy work. The two sources given link to bios on government pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wlmg (talk) 23:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Frank Pelzman


A tag has been placed on Frank Pelzman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 18:37, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Co-hosts of The View
Template:Co-hosts of The View has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GMA Anchors
Template:GMA Anchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 07:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ABCEveningNewsAnchors
Template:ABCEveningNewsAnchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:GoodMorningAmericaAnchors with Template:GMA Anchors
Template:GMA Anchors, which you created on May 23, 2006, has been nominated for merger with Template:GoodMorningAmericaAnchors, which was created by User:KeltieMartinFan on May 25, 2009. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Templates for discussion/Log/2017 May 26. &mdash;Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 22:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Today (U.S. TV program)
Template:Today (U.S. TV program) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:17, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ABCEveningNewsAnchors
Template:ABCEveningNewsAnchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:20/20Anchors
Template:20/20Anchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Today (U.S. TV program)
Template:Today (U.S. TV program) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Corkythe hornetfan  (ping me) 22:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GMA Anchors
Template:GMA Anchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Maryanne Connelly for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maryanne Connelly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maryanne Connelly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 03:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Christopher Callaghan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Callaghan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Christopher Callaghan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marquardtika (talk) 22:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of C. Scott Vanderhoef for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C. Scott Vanderhoef is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/C. Scott Vanderhoef until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marquardtika (talk) 22:49, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Todd Caliguire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Todd Caliguire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Todd Caliguire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas Shea for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Shea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thomas Shea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Maggie Brooks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maggie Brooks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maggie Brooks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Laureen Oliver


The article Laureen Oliver has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet notability guidelines"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WebsterNerd11 (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)